ML19207C129
| ML19207C129 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 07/09/1979 |
| From: | Mcneill W, Whitesell D NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19207C106 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99900033 99900033-79-2, NUDOCS 7909060470 | |
| Download: ML19207C129 (5) | |
Text
U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT REGION IV Report No. 99900033/79-02 Program No. 51300 Company:
Westinghouse Electric Corporation Electro Mechanical Division Cheswick Avenue Cheswick, Pennsylvania 15024 Inspection Conducted:
June 18-22, 1979 n
\\
l' Inspector:
h6 LQ,%
(K
]-k-l W. M. McNeill, Wontrac tor Inspector Date Vendor Inspection Branth I
(.
r /
Approved by:.
O ula
[h{Q _ Q
( M l -T -7 D. E. Whitesell,' Chief Components Section1 Date Vendor Inspection Branc j
Summary Inspection conducted June 18-22, 1979 (99900033/79-02)
Areas Inspected:
Implementation of Topical Report including manufacturing process controls; material identification and controls; testing of completed products; and action on previous inspection findings. The inspection involved thirty (30) inspector-hours on site by one (1) NRC inspector.
Results:
In the four (4) areas inspected, no apparent deviations or unresolved items were identified in three (3) areas.
The following one (1) deviation was identified.
Deviations: Manufacturing Process Controls - routings did not include certain inspection requirements, as required by Section 17.1.5 of the Topical Report and the Com:nercial Nuclear Quality Assurance Program Manual, Section 11.1.2.1 (See Notice of Deviation).
Unresolved Items:
None.
.r, 3 qao os Go t r 7900000 7 7O
2 DETAILS SECTION A.
Persons Contacted T. M. Alexovich, QC Supervisor J. B. Allen, Weld Engineering Manager AC. E. Anthony, General Manager R. A. Asselta, QA Engineer J. A. Burgwald, Engineering Assistent
- M. L. Horseman, QA Engineering J. A. Lowrey, Quality Control Operations Manager
- F. Meledandri, Task Force Manager P. L. Pacelli, QA Engineering G. J. Pribicko, Welding Engineering
- D. L. Ross, Field Assurance Manager R. Rudyak, Welding Supervisor R. F. Sinwell, QA Engineer D. E. Sisca, Test Engineer T. W. Stagnitta, QA Engineer R. W. Sweringen, Buyer C. A. Voelzke, QA Engineer
- Denotes those attending the Exit Interview.
B.
A_ction on Previous Inspection Findings (Closed) Deviation (Report No. 79-01)-
An unknown substance was detected in liquid penetrant containers. The unknown substance has been proven to be innocuous in penetrant testing.
A review of the shop found no similar problems.
(Closed) Deviation (Report No. 7';-01 ) :
Welding was not in accordance with the applicable weld procedure specification (WPS).
The particular WPS has been revised and updated.
A Manufacturing Procedure, 684, Revision 2, was revised and implemented to address surveillance of the welding.
C.
Manufacturing Process Controls 1.
Objective The objective of this atea of the inspection was to verify that the manufacturing process is controlled in accordance with applicable regulatory, code and contract requirements.
2.
[fethod of Accomplishment The preceding objective was accomplished by:
o r-8 w'? ns tL' a
3 a.
heview of the Commerical Nuclear Quality Assurance Program Manual, Revision 0; Section 5, Manufacturing, Inspection, and Test Instructions; Section 6, Control of Documents and Changes;Section II, In-Process and Final Inspection and Testing which established the general requirements for manufacturing process controls.
b.
Review of the following procedures which established the specific requirements of manufacturing process control:
Authorized Inspector Interface, Engineerin Instruction Manual, EIM-15, Revision 0, and Inspection Control Card, EIM-37, Revision 1.
c.
Review of the contract for a current order of pumps in fabri-cation, shop order U413, and its Change Notices, Procurement Advisory Requests, Purchasing Specifications and the Engineering Specification.
d.
Inspection of the routings of pressure boundry parts such as RC Pump Main Flange, Seal Housing, Upper Seal Housing and Main Loop Stop Valve Body, and verified that the above procedures were implemented.
Verification that the routings provide for the documentation of c.
the drawings and revisions to be used, and sign-off and date of the operations, inspections, or hold points.
Verification that the technical and QA requirements are included in the routings.
3.
Findings a.
Deviation See Notice of Deviation.
b.
Unresolved Items None.
D.
Material Identification and Control 1.
Objective The objective of this area of the inspection was to verify that material identification and control during manufacturing is in accordance with the applicable regulatory, code and contract requirements.
2.
Method of Accomplishment The preceding objective was accomplished by:
- r.,, n.1 U A & J l'z
~
4 a.
Review of the Commerical Nuclear Quality Assurance Program Manual, Revision 0; Section 7, Procurement and Section 8, Manufacturing Control which established the general requirements for material identification and controls.
b.
Review of the following procedures which established the specific requirements of material identification and control:
Part Identification and Control, Interdepartmental Procedure, IDP-E4, dated March 1972, Class 1.0 and Class 1.1, Serialization Control, Manufacturing Instruction Note, MIN-21, dated August 1977, and Code Control in the Main Shop, MIN-19, March 1979.
Inspection of six (6) valve parts found in the storeroom and three c.
(3) valve assemblies and verification that the above procedures were implemented.
d.
Verification that purchased material was properly identified, parts cut retained identification, material was positively traceable and as-built tabulations were compiled.
3.
Findings a.
Deviations None.
b.
Unresolved Items None.
E.
Testing of Completed Products 1.
Objectives The objectives of this area of the inspection were to verify that these activities were controlled in accordance with the QA Manual and appli-cable NRC and ASHE Code requirements:
a.
To verify that products are assembled in accordance with approved procedures and that all ancillary materials comply with approved specifications.
b.
To verify that functional tests of products are performed in accordance with approved test documents.
3.
a ~ r-u A []Y ' i t ?
5 2.
Method of Accomplishment The preceding objectives were accomplished by:
Review of the Commerical Nuclear Quality Assurance Manual, a.
Revision 0; Section 5, Manufacturing, Inspection, and Test Instructions; Section 7, Procurement and Section 11, In-Process and Final Inspection and Testing which established the general requirements for testing of completed products.
b.
Review of the following specifications which established the specific requirements of test controls:
Engineering Specification 677470, Revision 3, and Test Specification 786072, Revision E.
c.
Inspection of the Control Rod Drive Mechanism's test stand and witness of the production testing of two (2) Drive Mechanisms and verified implementation of the above.
3.
Findings a.
Deviations None.
b.
Unresolved Items None.
F.
Exit Interview The inspector met with management representatives (denoted in paragraph A) at the conclusion of the inspection on June 22, 1979.
The inspector summarized the scope and findings of the inspection. The management representativqs had no comment in response to each item discussed by the inspector?
O j i)b
-'*