ML19207B827

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comments on Draft NUREG-0553 Re Funding of State & Local Radiological Emergency Programs.All Costs for Implementing Emergency Planning Programs Should Be Born by Utils
ML19207B827
Person / Time
Site: Crane 
Issue date: 05/15/1979
From: Baldwin W
FRIENDS OF THE EARTH
To: Salomon S
NRC OFFICE OF STATE PROGRAMS (OSP)
References
RTR-NUREG-0553, RTR-NUREG-553 NUDOCS 7909050336
Download: ML19207B827 (1)


Text

.

FRIENDS OF THE EARTH 124 $PE AR S AN FR ANCliC0 C ALIFORNIA 94103 413 495-4770 May 15, 1979 Mr. Stephen N.

Salomon State Programs Officer U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.

20555 re: NUREG 0553, Funding of State and Local Government Radiological Emergency Response Plans

Dear Mr. Saloman:

I have reviewed your draft report referenced above.

It represents, in my view, a thorough examination of a problem presented to local governments by the construction of a nuclear pcwer plant nearby: they must fund a program of preparation for nuclear disaster.

As you are undoubtedly aware, all unrecovered costs paid by government funds (federal, state, or local) for regu-lation of nuclear power reactors are subsidies to the nuclear

industry, i.e.,

taxpayers pay for controlling a public menace placed in their community b'1 power companies and reactor builders.

I would suggest, therefore, that a guiding principle behind the initiation of widespread emergency planning near nuclear power reactors (an immediate NRC priority) must be that all costs of the program, federal, state, or local, be paid, di'rectly or indirectly, by the reactor owners.

Please send me a final draft of your report.

Sincerely,

i. l W. Andrew Baldwin Legal Director WA3:ah O t t m.- n v m. s ) <.. i5 i

i 30905 0jG?fb