ML19207B067
| ML19207B067 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 11/20/1972 |
| From: | Folsom S, Howard E, James O'Reilly NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I), US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| To: | |
| References | |
| 50-289-72-19, 50-320-72-08, 50-320-72-8, NUDOCS 7908230334 | |
| Download: ML19207B067 (3) | |
See also: IR 05000289/1972019
Text
.s-.
.,
,
. .
. . . _ , .
._ _ , .
.
..s
._-q e
4
_
"
,
-2
.
-wg
,
,.
, , . .
'N
_ . _ . . .
.%
.
-, C;&+MM, .:_. .~m
,,, m:d.. ?%
- . ...
- .:;.
x :~?qpf -m ~~. - -. A.W ';_.a?" %'
-
--
,.
a ,2>P-m .c. ti Vis . -. y-: '-
__
_
_ , .
- , ~ -
%
,
.;. ,
. -
--*=sw . :
-
-=.
- *
1
.
- -
4;;.x M & &
- = - . .
- .,4 ;. } y j.
n
s
-:
-
.
-
m
-- ..-
. - - .-
-
,,
3
.
- - .
. .
_
,
-
.
,
-
.r
-
i
..
.
- ,
m-
.
.
.
U. S. ATOMIC ENERGY C0bSiISSION
p.; ..;::q:::
DIRECTORATE OF REGULATORY OPERATIAS
Eu:
REGION I
50-289172-19
50-289
g
-
RO Inspection Report No. : e%_190/@l
Docket No.:
'to_12n
_
C
/
CPPR-40
E.
.
Licensee:
v trocolitan Edison Coreanv-
License No.: cpon-66
e
3
.a
?
Attention-
Mr.
J. G. Miller. Vice Pres.
Priority:
Unit 1-B
I:'i
P. O. Box 542
Category:
Unit 2-A
I
i;
Location:
Reading, Pa.
(Three Mile Island 1 & 2)
.'
Type of Licensee:
Type of Inspection:
Manazement Meetine
Dates cf Inspectien:
': eve: .b er 9. 1972
Dates of Previcus Inspection:
10/27/72
/ 7 [ ; L.
Principal Inspecto--
L~
/
hv.
//
Seth A. Folsom, Reactor Inspector
Date
'
Accc=panying Inspectors: .
b. O a.w-d c h
/ /- /7 '72
E. M. Mcward, Chief
Date
Reactor Construction Branch
h
-
a
~
J.
. O'Reilly, Dirh ter
Date
(r
0:her Acconpanying Perscnne.
__ ,_,
~-
%
Reviewed By:
4. [
m.2
//-Jo.72
J. P. O'Reilly, Director /
Da'te
.
'
'
q90823033
'iS 0JJ 8
-
"
\\\\
\\
..*..
m
. . . . .
,---,.~_.e-mm
~.---_.--mm
-
- - .
. . . . .
. . . , , . . .
.,
. . . . .
.
-p .
.
a.
-
~
.w . -
g4
. . .
,
i
-.
.
.
-
. .- . ._.
-.
,.. _.
'
"
- d,Mwe ? g4,4,- [ g& . 1~~~.;[ hg,
,
-
^:..
4e
.- .
,
!
E'f:., ' 9
. . ~. . n Lk
m-
-
. . . -
. .. . :; % , %a, .m.aw g,si.s+r;:S.,6
y-
_3 3 2 , . , . .. _
, - -
-
.w. . ', c - - - . ,
- ' ~
.
.
.
, . -
y. b .* ,.
.
%.
-
.
. . -
.,,g.
-
.
.
,_
__
.-
.
. . . .
,
.
. . . . .
,
SUMMARY OF ?INDINGS
- ---
.
. . . . .
.
Enforcement Action
. - . .-
.
Licensee Action on Previousiv Identified Enforcement Ite=s
E: . _ . .
.
Not applicable.
[
"
t
Design Chances
'
. . _ .
Not applicable.
.
_
E
Unusual occurrences
'
Not applicairle.
Other Sienificant Findines
Not applicable.
Management Meeting
The canage=ent meeting was conducted in the Region I, Regulatory Operations
Office, Newark, New Jersey, with the folicwing individuals:
Metrocolitan Edison C- many
J. G. Miller, Vice President
i
General Public Utilities
W. G. Kuhns, President
G. F. Trewbridge, Counsel
General Public Utilities Service Coro.
W. A. Verrochi, Vice President, Design & Construction
B. G. Avers, P2 nager, Quality Assurance
R. W. Heward, Jr., Project Manager
United Encineers and Constructors
Thoras M. Dahl, President
Henry M. Chance II, Chairman
L. Shprint , Senior Project Manager
-
E . C . Na g le , Project Manager
z-..-
F. L. Reed, Quality Assurance and Reliability Manager
tg
-
. . . . .
. . . . .
,%,,.
i..eee.
W
--':S$
~* ' : ~;i- T - " .=..M
.i.. W.:a
tn~~N~2. a
- ?iWT-c
M .:Wr -.
l
-
..:b-k $+en>.% % = &W . -. --- 4 . ~
.e .t.
~ ~c=
~if Y4%
.-Yri.W ,.~.N-
-~m.=-~-
--
c
C@W ** !K!-32M%M_<MQjfjfJQQ'---WYC.M!r&C"TQM'~Tr--MM4Glil-h%'nE _ ? 12'- 'N
1- ~ [.
- f,
.
M
~.
3'
' " $ ; C ' J'
~
V~~ ~
$.3~~
~
_ m:y .
~ . m. 3
v..--y 9
-2_~.__ ,-
-.-
-
7..
=
_
g3
.*
L
T . - ;" - - . . . :::
-
.. }
% L.!M A
.-.
-
_g
j.
-
..;
s
.
. . ~~
i
- q
.
,.
.
.f. .
Items discussed are su==arized below:
-
"
"
_
-_.
.
.
. . .
d.[ #
A.
The_ Director, Region I, stated that the purpose of the meeting was to
_. _.
discuss with corporate canagement the Quality Assurance history of the
'i
- Ihree Mile Island projects; to e=phasize the i=portance of =aintaining
..Z
.
a viable and detailed quality program throughout the final stages of
n
construction; to e=phasize the i=portance of tirely develop =ent and
c._,
implementation of the quality program to the preoperational and startup
. . .
phases, and to discuss the require =ent for a quality program for the
_
p
operations phase.
..
B.
It was stated by Region I representatives that a rapid expansion of
construction activities during the final eighteen conths of construc-
tion, with concurrent preoperational and startup activities, can
result in failures in related Quality progra=s. Early =anage=ent
recognition and action on unsatisfactory trends can prevent or
minimize these type failures anc facilitate the orderly growth of
such piograms in proportion to work which cust be performed.
Tne
Three Mile Island program was stated, based on inspection findings,
to have reached this point of increased activity and that Region I
plans to conitor its perfor=ance of their progra=s closely during
the next several conths.
It was stated by Region I representatives that previous problems
have been noted in construction that appear to indicate additional
attention to the quality progran during the remainder of the con-
struction phase and the preoperational and startup phases.
The AEC's e=phasis on quality assurance in all phases was discussed
with the licensee's attention directed to early development of a
quality assurance program for the operations phase.
,
C.
The licensee stated that a reorganization had been recently effected
which established a canagerial position for the quality function.
This position reports directly to the vice-president in order to
assure that proper e=phasis is placed on cuality in all areas.
The
licensee recognized that work remained in completing the quality
assurance aspects of the preoperational test and startup program;
however, the; stated that this area was being given a great deal
of attention.
The licensee stated that they felt that they had been responsive to
their own concerns and to the ACC findings in the area of construc-
tion, as indicated by their organizational cha ges and specific
acti.ns on individually identified findinFs.
-he licensee a lso
statec that they had estab lished procedures and cc=itr - ats w.-ich
might be unduly restrictive.
They expre med their inte-tions to
continue their review of such procedures , and foll~.eing a nalyses ,
to modify procedures and cone.itments where apprope ate
- ich were
so identifiud and whica did act adversely af.ect f acility or ; er-
sonnel safety.
.
.- ___
~ _ _ - - ~ _
. . . .
~ .- ': :
~~~' '^~'
~
'
' ~~
-
.:."--.'.."
. - -
-