ML19206A264
| ML19206A264 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 01/08/1978 |
| From: | Jarboe C JARBOE, C.J. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19206A260 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7904180446 | |
| Download: ML19206A264 (3) | |
Text
b C!mL J. Jn'rC
% 'N Q,%q.
O ". "...a....' a. -
c' '.
~
g
.'.Iechanic.si:urg, Pa.
N'
, i p 1 w.3.>
iw s.
us s
- y,
,Q r\\
p.
y't,.y \\ s Q -
!- l a
- l 1,.-,
M h
i d,
Sp C,.
v e f'7/
In the Matter of
)
/
/. I n$, /
/.
I
)
- /
MET 20FCLITAN EDISCN CCMPANY
)
d JERSEY CE!! TRAL, PC':ER & LIGHT CCMPANY
)
Docks,,,,o.
50-320 and
)
a PENNSYL7ANIA ELECTRIC CCMPANY
)
)
(Three Mile Island Nuclear Station,
)
Unit ::o. 2)
)
January 3, 1978 EXCEPTICNS to II.ITIAL DE0ISICN 2. Chair an Luton stated uncategorically that the evidence and viewe precented by 14-4 tod appearors will play absolutely no part in the decision readered by the Atocic Safety & Licensing Board.
1-April 5, 1977, tr 165 2-June 10, 1977, tr 2756 3-June 10, 1977, tr 2757 This view of the Co==1ssion's responsibility is inconsictant with the Natio..nl Invironmental Folicy Act of 1969 and is therefore illegal. The NE-A of 1969 requirea the connicsion to evaluate all the concequences of the propoced licanains actica and of alternatives to the lice nsing ac tion, regardlo.- s of who the party raising suggestions for consideration by the Co--d ssion happe to be.
II-Chairman Lutor. repeatedly stated or i=pl'.ed that advance motice tr tne Cocciasion is recuired ':o present a li=ited appearance.
1-April 5, 1977, tr 133(lins 19,20) 2-april 5, 1977, tr 133(line 19,20) 3-June 10, 1977, tr 2665(lines 3 & 4) 4-June ir, 1977, tr 2665(lime 7)
The motice of the licensing hearings in tha local newspaper stated that alco.
The Ivetine :ews,,Jednesday, March 30, 1977, p. 61 es This aa added on, arbitrary conditio2 placed on limitad a pp e ar a nc e.s and in not g
r'apported 'oy 10 CTR 5ection 2.715a=
,', r-n r,s t
7W> W8W L
1 page 2 I!!- Tne granting of an op.ating licence to Unit 2 of Three ::11e Ialand is u: constitutional.
There is no private insurance availaole for protectica against nuclear radiation. In tr.. absence of any insurance coversge realictically related to potentia.
cost for a nuclear accident, the granting of this licence is a violation of the equal protection provision that is included withis the dua procesa clause of the Fifth a ead:ent. It places the coat of the benefit to all of GIU'a custo=ers on an arbitrarily chosen segment of society, we here in the Harrisburg area.
IV-The Ato ic Sa f e ty & Lic sacias Board, a branch of the !!RC, sitting no judge and jury la this proceeding, rad another branch of the same organic. tion, tho
'! 30 sta ff, participa tisg as as advocate for granting of the license is an ishorent inflict of interest and readers the whole proceeding ludicrou==
This is in conflict with the separation of pro =otion of nuclear power and protection of we the citizens fro = the environnental effecta of suelear power ao m>ndated by the Act of Congress is 1974 establieni=g ERDA and the NRC.
_V-As a citizen living within 15 air miles of Unit 2 of T.;I, who will be affsetot greatly by the enviro 1= ental ccuseque=ces of daily operation and any accident at TMI 2, I as outraged tha t the Femna. Dept. of :vironzestal 3=sourceo and the U.S.
uuclear Regulatory Co-d esica Staff, who chould be ackisc hard questicas to protect my health and welfare, analogous to *ho.s e of the Intervenors, are participating in the proceeding as advocates for geanting of this licesse.
Thia is in direct conflict to the statutea of the State of penna. and the United States which created these agent:1es and =andated that they provide for our enviro:: ental protection. It is also a violation of the NEpA of 1969.
VI-The NRO S ta ff's rslianc e on the Rac=ussex Reactor Safety Study as objective, a ceasingful estimate of probable risks masociated with the operation of precent day light-water nuclear power plastc, and =ethodology receiving a broad and increasing endorsenent by the infs.* ed scientific co unity is co=pletely contra-dicted by fact and therefore unwarranted.
On the contrary, =uch evidence has surfaced showing the etudy to be heavily biased, the resulta seasingless, the methodology " leading to sillisena", and increasing criticis by tne isforced scientific co== unity.
VII-There is no regulatory require =ent to actify the general public of:
1-allowable employee doses of radiation at nuclear plants, reprocessing plants, etc.
2-iscreaned genetic risk to offspring of plant ecployees 3-reports of past family and social disruptions due to contanimatics o f r.m employee at a plant 4-increased genetic risk to peraans and offspring by =arriage to a plant e=ployee This lack of regulatery require =ent to infor= the general public of this T ry serigua enviren=eatal i= pact of muelear power plaats is a gross violatica of the NEIA of 1969.
'>1 uGd
-orc
page 3 VIII-There 10 currwatly so percaneat cetnod for the storago of nuclear waatec. The elicisatics of the reprocessing option oy executive order of tuo 1recident a:c the unecono:1c= of reprceear.ing 1: the private sector nas readored void much of ths LC Staff's projecticas re garding nucle ar w:.s ta a frc: TMI 2.
Thia eans that speat fuel will oe left at TMI 2, co=pacted, and year by year pose an it.creasisc h..rd to the health and sa f e ty o f e=ploye es of TMI 2 and citizesc o: the aarrizour; area.
Thi <.5 is 12 viol-tics of the :ir.,I-A o f 1969 C ~, ". . 2' u'. i. " u' r' _n"'/ t v'.
t.
I hereby certify th.t copies of the foregoir.; "E.<ceptiore to Isitial 3-cicio ",
in tho ca t t e r o f diT.~.01-CI.!T.us 2]!..Gi CE T.ui Y, et. al.(Three..ile Islana nuclear Sener. ting utation, Cait 2), Cocket !o. 5C-3~.0, usted Janu.ry 3, 1978, n.ve been cer.el upoa each of toe pers;as liated os th e f ollc..-iag s e rvic e liat by c.11, post.go prepaid, thiu 3th day of Janu.ry, 1975.
nl}
t
.wkk/
/.
cari J. Jari
.c-.,,,..,a z a.. +. :.
- t. x -.
1-Chauscy.% Eepford 5- : dward Lutoa, inq.
2-Karla '... Carter, Esq.
6-Gustave Linenberger n.
3-Ernest L. Elske, Esqe 7-Dr. Ernest C. Salo l+-Ee:ry J. McGrrren, Esq.
8-Alan 5. Rosenth.el, Zaq.
Gregory H. Faus, it;q.
9-Docketing and Service section 10- Director of iucle r Reactor Regulatic.-
,.., m e.
g
\\
.#\\
a
.\\
' l
\\*.
- o r.3, y
.s:
-