ML19157A013
| ML19157A013 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Dresden  |
| Issue date: | 06/05/2019 |
| From: | Gregory Roach Exelon Generation Co |
| To: | NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB |
| Roach G | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17214A855 | List: |
| References | |
| Download: ML19157A013 (1) | |
Text
ES-201 Examination Outline Qualitv Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: Dresden Generating Station Date of Examinalion'. 4l8l 18 Item Task Description lnitials a
b*
c**
W R
I T
T E
N
/
ilfnll +
b.
Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared Section D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401N and whether all llA categories are in accordance with appropriately sampled
/
['lNü t
- c. Assess whether the outline overemphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generc topics.
7,fdN t
- d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected l(/A statements are appropriate. 2 trll\\\\$
+
2.
s I
M U
L A
T o
R a.
Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover th required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major transients.
I }lNÑ a
- b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.
/
)6 c.
io the xtent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conforms with the qualitative and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D and in section D.5, "specific lnstructions for the'simulator operating Test,"'of ES-301 (including overlap).
/
ûl'\\ 6, 3.
W A
L K
T H
R o
U G
H
- a. Verify that the systems walkthrough outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:
(1) The outline(s) contains the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form.
(2) Task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form.
(3) No tasks are duplicated from the applicant's audit test(s).
(4) The number of new or modified tasks meeb or exceeds the minimums specified on the form.
(5) The number of alternate-path, low-power, emergency, and radiologically controlled area tasks meets the criteria on the form.
r (tJ e?
b.
ES-301-1 examinations. r --1 6
- c. Determine whether there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.
I in 6
4.
G E
N E
R A
L
- a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including probabilistic risk assessment and individual plant examination insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections.
/
e
- b. Assess whether the 1 0 CFR 55.41, 55.43, and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.
? N c
Ensure that l(A importance ratings (except for planspecific priorities) are at least 2.5.
7 il[\\ c
- d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections and the last two NRC exams.
r fN G;
- e. Check the entire exam for balance of
'hN G
\\,lll
,GO D"Vt; ttltt hE
- J#
Wa a.
b.
c.
d.
Author Facility Reviewer (-)
NRC Chief Examiner (#)
n NRC Supervisor
. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines.
- The independent NRC reviewer initials items in column "c"; the chief examiner's concurrence is required.
I En, [J".tkr,., otlr,,.¿ 5'¿ta vcvL V5-Zo -¿ J"'L?ú"r(
k-rta, 1
(n nJR.C ú. *d d.rcu w^&l o q