ML18302A299

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Full Metrics for FY2018
ML18302A299
Person / Time
Issue date: 11/01/2018
From:
Division of Construction Inspection and Operational Programs
To:
Division of Construction Inspection and Operational Programs
Sakadales A
Shared Package
ML18302A287 List:
References
Download: ML18302A299 (4)


Text

Second Quarter VIPP Performance Metrics VIPP Current Metric Title Definition Criteria/FY Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Status Trends Accomplish DCIP's Established Perform a minimum Accomplish DCIPs established number of inspections per fiscal year to capture a VIP-O-1A Number of Inspections per Fiscal of 35 inspections 7 6 6 6 25 reasonable perspective of industry performance.

Year during FY 2017.

Expect industry attendance at Perform an annual assessment of NONs and NOVs to identify generic industry vendor workshops Completion of Annual Assessment issues and take corrective actions as necessary. Corrective actions may include VIP-O-1B and industry 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%

of the Number of NOVs and NONs discussions at the vendor workshop, issuance of generic communications, and outreach meetings other activities.

and through generic communications.

Expect stable or Branch chiefs and senior inspectors will solicit feedback from vendors at the Obtain Feedback from Vendors increasingly VIP-O-2A inspection site on such aspects as the immediate inspection effort, vendor 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%

During Vendor Inspections positive perception oversight, or NRC requirements and guidance.

over time.

90% of inspection Obtain data on the total number of inspections that were notified to the vendor within the announcements VIP-O-2B Notification of Inspection 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%

timeliness goals stipulated in Section 10 of this plan. greater than 30 days 90% of inspection VIP-O-2C Inspection Plans are Timely Obtain data from ADAMS plans issue within 7 100.00% 100.00% 80.00% 100.00% 95.65%

days Obtain data on the total number of inspection reports issued within the timeliness goals 90% of inspection VIP-O-2D Inspection Reports are Timely stipulated in Section 10 of this plan and Inspection Manual Chapter 0617, Vendor and reports issued 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 85.71% 95.24%

Quality Assurance Implementation Inspection Reports, dated October 3, 2013. within 45 days 90% of Acknowledgment Letters Are Obtain data on the total number of acknowledgement letters issued within the timeliness acknowledgement VIP-O-2E 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%

Timely goals stipulated in Section 10 of this plan. letters issued within 30 days Retract less than Inspection Results Accepted by VIP-O-2F Track the total number of NOVs and NONs contested by vendors. 10% of NOVs and 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%

Stakeholders NONs Conduct all support within the Allegation program timeliness goals.

Support includes, but is not limited to, providing input for ARB VIP-O-3 Allegation Support Achieve the timely submittal of allegation response documents. materials, attending 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%

ARBs, providing input to RFIs, participating in phone calls with the CI, providing input for closure and response after closure letters, etc.

Second Quarter VIPP Performance Metrics Expect 90 percent Branch Chiefs assess inspectors in training for progress in achieving qualifications at VIP-O-4A Assessment of Trainee Qualification of trainees to 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%

least quarterly.

qualify in 2 years.

Maintain annual VIP-O-4B Assessment of Inspector ProficiencyMaintain proficiency for all qualified inspectors. proficiency for all 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%

qualified inspectors

Second Quarter VIPP Performance Metrics Note During FY2018, the vendor inspection staff completed a total of 25 inspections. DCIP has met the Good/Improving or exceeding the goal required 25 inspections as stated in the VIPP.

During FY2018, there were significantly less findings than the prior year. The vendor inspection staff continued its outreach with the nuclear supply chain, through the NRCs Workshop on Vendor Oversight, and our involvement with industry organizations such as NUPIC, the Multinational Design Evaluation Programme (MDEP), the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) Joint Utility Task Group (JUTG), the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Nuclear Quality Assurance-1 (NQA- Steady/Insufficient Data 1), and Nuclear Oversight Conferences. Last year, we provided presentations on such topics as Challenges in the Qualification of First-of-a-Kind Components, the NRC Inspection Program, and Regulatory Updates. These face-to-face interactions provide an open forum for exchanging information During FY2018, the Branch Chiefs and/or lead inspectors solicided feedback during all exit meetings. Not meeting the mark Out of the twenty-three Announcement Letters issued in the FY2018, all met the timeliness requirements.

Out of the twenty-trhee Inspection Plans issued in FY2018, all but one met the timeliness requirements.

Out of the twenty-one Inspection Reports issued in FY2018, all but one met the timeliness requirements.

Out of the thirteen Acknowledgement Letters issued in FY2018, all met the timeliness requirements.

There were no costested NOVs or NONs by stakeholders in FY2018.

Vendor staff provided support on 29 allegations (2 NRR and 27 NRO) during FY2018. No reactive inspections were in FY2018. Vendor staff provided support to 37 allegation actions (2 NRR and 35 NRO) in FY2018. NRO inspection staff met allegation timeliness metrics for their input.

Second Quarter VIPP Performance Metrics One vendor inspection passed the vendor qualifications in FY2018 and met the timeliness requirement. One inspector is on track to pass his vendor qualifciation in FY2019.

4 vendor trainings were completed in FY2018.