ML18230B034
| ML18230B034 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Harris  |
| Issue date: | 08/15/1977 |
| From: | Mcduffie M Carolina Power & Light Co |
| To: | Case E Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| Download: ML18230B034 (31) | |
Text
NRC FoRM 195
Ã-7d)
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMi ION NRC DISTRIBUTION FoR PART 50 DOCKET NIATERIAL CKETTNUM E R d-UM TO:
Mr. Edson Gi Case
~V FROM'arolina Power
& Light Company
- Raleigh, North Carolina M. A. McDuffie OATE OF OOCUMENT 8/15/77 OATE RECEIVEO 8/17/77 LETTER H'ORIGINAL QCOPY DESCRIPTION EhVOTOR IZEO JckfNCLASSIFIE0 PROP INPUT FORM ENCI OSURE NUMEER OF COPIES RECEIVED 3 464M Notorized 8/15/77 ~ ~ ~ intrans the following:
~0 gggOU 4 N<%8I%6 f
(1-P)
PLANT NAME: Shearon Harris 1-2-3-4 RJL 8/17/77 Amend g 66 to the Environ Rept,
~ consisting of revised and additional pages to the Environ Rept' w/attached Certificate of Service
~ ~ ~ ~
(21-P)
FOR@ACTION/INFORMATION EVaHRH%KNTAL
~
C7C MANAGER:
ENSING ASS'XSTANT:
ASSIGNED AD:
V~ MOORE LTR BRANCH CHIEF:
PJ PROJECT MANAGER:
O I N LICENSING ASSISTANT:
Bo HARLESS ISTRI8UTION INTERNAL0
~7FMS SAFETY HEINEMAN ENGINEERING PLAJ,IT SYSTEMS TEDESCO BENAROYA IPPOLITO OPERATIN REACTORS SITE SAFETY &
ENVIRON ANALYSIS DENTON & ~HLER HWXRO TECH ERNST B
SITS ANALYSIS VOLI2KR BUNCH J,
COLLINS GER 7
~
TIC EXTERNALOISTR I8UTION NSIC IV J
HANGHETT 16 CYS ACRS SENT CAT GO Y NRC FORM 195 I2.7d)
CONTROL NUiVI8ER 7qp~vo ui p gnVI fS,
J
)
'0
~ I I
H
Carolina Power & Light Company August 15, 1977 Mr. Edson G. Case, Acting Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.
S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.
C.
20555 RE:
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNITS 1, 2, 3
DOCKET NOS 50 400~
50 401 j 50 402 ~
AND 50 403 AMENDMENT NO.
66 AND 4 'l
Dear Mr. Case:
Carolina Power
& Light Company herewith transmits three (3) originals and forty-one (41) copies of Amendment No.
66 to its License Application for the Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant Units 1, 2, 3, and 4.
This Environ-mental Report Amendment provides current information on the Company's specific power needs as well as updated information in various administrative and engineering areas.
Amendment No.
66 is submitted in the form of,page changes to the Environmental Report, and instructions are included for 'inserting the Amendment pages.
Copies of this Amendment have been served on Mr. Vassar P.
- Shearon, Chairman, Board of County Comnd.ssioners of Wake County, North Carolina, and Mr. Ben Wimberly, Chairman, Board, of County Commissioners of Chatham County, North Carolina, and parties to the proceeding.
The original and thirty (30) copies of the Certificate of Service are enclosed.
As required by Commission Regulations, this Amendment is signed under oath by a duly authorized officer of the Company.
Yours very truly, M. A. McDuffie Senior Vice President Engineering
& Construction MAM/gsm Enclosures ATTEST:
Robert M. Williams Assistant Secretary Sworn to and subscribed before me this
)tttlllllglI
~ 0 NOTA']
i "O8Lic:
~
4l 4
r
~
15th day of August, $
00"tt~
',i>
Notary Public hly Commission Expires October 4, 1981 336 Fayetteville Street
~ P 0 Box1551
~ Raleigh N C 27602 77~&'pA ~~
I 4
UNITED STATES OF AMERXCA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMXSSXON In the Matter of
)
)
CAROLINA POWER 6 LIGHT COMPANY
)
)
(Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant
)
)
Units 1, 2, 3, and 4)
)
Docket Nos.
50-400 50-401 50-402 50-403 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE This is to certify that a copy of Amendment No.
66 to the License Application of Carolina Power 6 Light Company for construction permits for its Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant Units 1, 2, 3, and 4 has'his 15th day of
- August, 1977 been served upon the Chief Executive Officers of Wake and Chatham
- Counties, North Carolina, by deposit of the same in the United States mail addressed as follows:
Mr. Vassar P.
- Shearon, Chairman Board of County Commissioners of Wake County P. 0.
Box 550 Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 Mr. Ben Wimberly, Chairman Board of County Commissioners of Chatham County Post Office Box 111 Pittsboro, North Carolina 27312 The number of copies in parenthesis of Amendment 66 have also been served this 'day upon each member of the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board, other appropriate NRC personnel, parties to the proceedings, and interested persons and agencies by deposit of the same in the United States mail addressed as follows:
Ivan W. Smith, Esq.
(1)
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel U.
S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.
C.
20555 Mr. Glenn 0. Bright (1)
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.
C.
20555
Dr. J.
V. Leeds (1) 10807 Atwell
- Houston, Texas 77001 Mr. Nathaniel H. Goodrich, Chairman (1)
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel U.
S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.
C.
20555 Secretary (1)
U.
S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.
C.
20555 Attention:
Chief, Public Proceeding Staff Mr. Thomas S. Erwin (1)
Post Office Box 928 115 West Morgan Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 Mr. C. A. Barth (1)
Regulatory Staff Counsel U.
S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.
C.
20555 Jesse C. Brake, Esq.
(1)
Department of Justice Post Office Box 629 Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 Mr. Dave Hopkins (1)
Environmental Protection Agency 1421 Peachtree
- Street, N. E.
Atlanta, Georgia 30309
\\
Dr. Sidney R. Galler (6)
Deputy Assistant Secretary fox EnvironmentalAffairs U.
S. Department of Commerce 14th
& Constitution, N. W.,
Rm 3425 Washington, D.
C.
20230 Mr. Bruce Blanchard, Director (18)
Office of Environmental Projects
- Review, Room 4239 U.
S. Department of Interior 18th
& C Streets, N.W.
Washington, D.
C.
20240 Mr. Robert Ochinero, Director (1)
National Oceanographic Data Center Environmental Data Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration U.
S. Department of Commerce Washington, D.
C.
20235 Mr. Whitman Ridgeway, Chief (1)
Bureau of Power Federal Power Commission, Rm.
5100 825 North Capitol Street, N.E.
Washington, D.C.
20426 Chief (transmittal letter only)
Division of Ecological Services Bureau of Sport Fisheries
& Wildlife U.
S. Department of Interior 18th
& C Streets, N.
W.
Washington, D.
C.
20240 Mr. Charles Custard, Director (2)
U.
S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Room 524F2 200 Independence
- Avenue, S.W.
Washington, D. C..
20201 Dr. Carl N. Schuster, Jr.
(2)
Federal Power Commission, Rm.
4016 825 North Capitol Street, N.E.
Washington, D. C.
20426 cc of transmittal letter to:
Captain William R. Riedel (4)
Water Resources Coordinator W/S 73 U.S.C.G.,
Room 7306 U. S. Department of Transportation 400 7th Street, S.W.
Washington, D.
C.
20590 Environmental Evaluation Branch (WH-548)
Office of Water and Hazardous Materials Environmental Protection Agency Waterside Mall, Rm.
2818 401 M Street, S.W.
Washington, D.C.
20460 Mr. Robert Garvey, Executive (1)
Director Advisory Council on Historic Preservation 1522 K Street, N.W., Suite 430 Washington, D.
C.
20005 Chief, Energy Systems Analyses Branch Office of Radiation Programs (1)
Environmental Protection Agency Waterside Mall, Rm.
645 E. Tower 401 M Street, S.W.
Washington, D.
C.
20460 (AW-459)
Director (transmittal letter only)
Division of Archives and History Department of Cultural Resources 109 East Jones Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27611 Regional Administrator (1)
Department of Housing and Urban Development 1371 Peachtree
- Street, N.E.
Atlanta, Georgia 30309 U.
S. Department of the Army (1)
Corps of Engineers P.
O. Box 1890 Wilmington, North Carolina 28401 Atomic Industrial Forum (1) 1747 Pennsylvania
- Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.
C.
20006 Triangle J Council of Governments (1)
P. 0.
Box 12276 Research Triangle Park Durham, North Carolina 27709
l~
V
Mr. Richard H. Broun (transmittal letter only)
Environmental Clearance Officer Department of Housing and Urban Development 451 7th Street, S.W.,
Rm.
7258 Washington, D.
C.
20410 Office of Intergovernmental (10)
Relations 116 West Jones Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27603 Librarian/Thermal Reactors (1)
Building 130 Brookhaven National Laboratory Upton, L.I., New York 11973 Mr. Joseph Canny (transmittal letter)
Office of Environmental Affairs U.
S. Department.of Transportation 400 7th Street, S.W.,
Room 9422 Washington, D.
C.
20590 EIS Coordinator (4)
Environmental Protection Agency 345 Courtland Street Atlanta, Georgia 30308 Mr. James T. Curtis, Jr.
(1)
Materials Transportation Bureau 2100 Second Street, S.W.
Washington, D.
C.
20590 Secretarial Representative (1)
U.
S. Department of Transportation Suite 515 1720 Peachtree
- Road, N.W.
Atlanta, Georgia 30309 Dr. R. F. Foster, Associate Manager (10)
Battelle Memorial Institute Pacific Northwest Laboratories P.
O. Box 99
- Richland, Washington 99352 Richard E. Jones Associate General Counsel Carolina Power 6 Light Company Business Address:
336 Fayetteville Street
- Raleigh, N. C.
27602 Business Telephone:
Area Code 919 836-6517 August 15 1977
'I 4
C'
CAROLINA POMER 8 LIGHT CONPANY SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POMER PLANT 'UNITS 1, 2, 5, AND 5
This Amendment contains updated information in various administrative and engineering
- areas, and updated responses to Mr. W. H. Regan, Jr.'s letter of July 8, 1977.
This information is submitted in. the form of page changes to the Environmental Report, with each revised, page bearing the nota-tion "Amendment No. 66" at the bottom 'of the page.
Vertical bars have been used in the margins of the revised pages to indicate the location of the revisions on the page.
After all the revised material has been added to the Environmental Report, place -the Amendment No.
66 transmittal letter with Certification and Instruction sheet at the back of the contents of the Environmental Report.
The following page removals and insertions should be made to" incorporate Amendment No.
66 into the Environmental Report.
REMOVE Existin Pa es INSERT (Amendment No.
66 Pa es SECTION 2
- 2. 1-9a
~3.2-4a t303-2 SECTION 3 r3.2-4a SECTION S
<S.7-4a Q 7-4b W. 7-4a
~8. 7-4b JB. 7-9
)V f
8
~
~
/ng.
/'Pig. 3.3-4
/Pig. 3.3-5 PIGURES Wig. 3.3-3 Wig. 3.3-4
~kg. 3.3-5 Responses to Mr. -W. H. Regan, Jr.'s Letter of July 8, 1977 AQ>->
~Q3-1
+QQ3-2
~ QQ3-3
/QQ3-4
~
/qQ3-5
~ W
the utilization of a lower starting threshold of the wind sensors at the lower level.
The max um accident 0-2 hour equivalent 5% dilution factor (x/Q) at the SHNPP exclusion oundary using the calculati al procedures presented in the NRC Branch Technical sition HMB "Diffusion C dition for Design Basis Accident-Evaluations" and by usin the revised meteor ogical data for the lower level wind sensor is 8.8 x 10 sec/m 2.1. 6
~Geolo 2.1.6.
introduction Engineering geolo studies o
the site consisted of an investigation and detailed inspection o
surface featur
, exposed road cuts, excavated
- trenches, bedrock outcrops, a Br.ton Compass 8 is 2.1-9a Amendment No. 64
e
reservoir, and from there pumped to the cooling tower basin.
Additional makeup to the main reservoir will be available due to the runoff from the drainage area above the main dam.
Some blowdown to the main reservoir will be required in order to keep the tower total dissolved solids concentration at an acceptable level.
This small amount (15 cfs average) of heated blow-down will not materially affect the temperature of the reservoir waters.
The average'emperature of this blowdown water for each month based on adverse meteorological data is as follows:
oF op January February March April June 74 74 79 82 87 89 July August September October November December 91 92 88 84 7/
77 The dam for the main reservoir will be located about 2;5 miles upstream from the confluence of Buckhorn Creek with th Cape Fear River.
Normal releases from the main reservoir will occur over an uncontrolled spillway.
The expected average reservoir release will be approximately 19 cfs.
These releases will meet applicable state water quality standards.
Discussions with North Carolina State University's agricultural staff, U.S.D.A., and county extension chairmen indicate that there are no known withdrawals for irrigation from the Cape Fear River.
The principal economic crop in the Cape Fear basin is tobacco;
- however, the land along the Cape Fear is not generally suited to production of tobacco.
Tobacco is grown in the uplands and irrigation water, if used, is taken from farm ponds or wells.
The lands along the Cape Fear are either wooded, pasture or used for crops that are not generally irrigated in North Carolina.
As a result of analysis of municipal and industrial water use data and discussions with representatives of federal, state, and local agencies concerning irrigation, it has been d'etermined that the Harris Plant will not affect either the municipal, agricultural, or industrial surface water uses of the Cape Fear River downstream of the Harris Plant Site.
3.2-4a Amendment Nos. 24,28,36
will be from blowdown of the cooling towers to control dissolved solids in the closed cycle system.
Conduction from the water in the cooling towers is proportional to the difference in water temperature and air temperature.
Evaporative heat losses are proportional to the difference in saturation vapor pressure of the cooling water and the water vapor pressure of the air.* Total
'consumptive water use in the operation of the cooling towers and makeup pond are 106 cfs under average meteorological conditions and 125 cfs under extremely adverse meteorological conditions with the plant operating at 100% capacity.
Heat released to the main reservoir will be onlv in the cooling tower blowdown with an average release rate of 15 cfs.
Blowdown will be taken from the coolest water in the system.
This water will range from approximately 7'F above ambient pond temperature in July, to approximately 28'F above ambient in December.
Blowdown will be released through a diffuser.
Because of the small quantities involved, the mixing zone is expected to be small, about 100-130 acres anticipated.
Figures 3.3-4 and 3.3-5 show the main reservoir isotherms for summer and winter adverse meteorological conditions.
The warm blowdown in excess of state water quality standards extends over a limited area of less than 60 acres.
Figure 3.3-3 shows the area over which the mixing zone will extend.
This area is not always fully occupied by the elevated water temperatures, but represents the area over which the heated area fluctuates, depending on makeup pond current patterns.
Outside of this allowable mixing zone the makeup pond temperatures are within 5'F of equilibrium temperature, and less than 90'F.
The lake levels of Figures 3.3-4 and 3.3-5 approximate the elevations during critical drought periods corresponding to the winter of 1925-26 and the sum-mer of 1925 respectively.
The 1925-26 period was one of the three most critical drought periods synthesized for Buckhorn Creek from records on Middle Creek.
For lake elevations 215 and 217 feet, the average and maximum water depths are 14 and 16 feet, respectively.
In both cases the minimum water depth is zero.
t 3 ~ 3 2
Amendment Nos. 28, 36
The various transmission alternatives studies for the Harris Plant may be grouped into three basic shemes:
Plan I, Plan II, and Plan III. In Plan I all of the generating units at Harris and all of the lines from the plant would be installed at 500 KV.
The three lines required would connect the plant with area load centers.
A typical alternate studied in Plan I is shown in Figure 8.,7-1 which shows the proposed grid on the area of interest in the Company's service area.
The area of study is shown on Figuxe 3.11-5 as the blocked in area.
These 500 KV lines would be located along, new routes requiring new rights-of-way.
In addition to the Wake and Richmond 500/230 KV substations, two new 500/230 KV substations at Sanford and Cumberland will be required to securely connect the Harris 500 KV generation to the system 230 KV grid.
In order to serve other systems load centers and to tie Sanford Substation firmly to the transmission grid, 230 KV lines ax'e required from the 500/230 KV substation as shown in Figure 8.7-1.
This alternative would require a total of 5,334 acres of transmission right-of-way of which 4,514 acres would be new.
In Plan II one unit at Harris would be connected to the Company's tranmission grid with 230 KV lines.
The other three units would be connected with 500 KV lines.
This alternative will requiie three 500 KV lines and.three 230 KV lines from the Harris Plant as shown in Figure 8.7-2.
The 500 KV lines would be constructed along new routes requiring new rights-of-way.
As in Plan I, two new 500/230 KV substations would be required.
One of these would be in the Erwin load area and the second would be in the Fayetteville load area.
The two additional 230 KV lines from Cape Fear shown in Figure 8.7-2 are necessary to deliver power to the Asheboro and Fayetteville load centers and 8.7-4 Amendment Nos.
24, 36, 64
to provide a strong tie between the plant and the transmission grid.
This plan would require a total of 5,624 acres of transmission right-of-way of which 4,471 acres would be new.
Plan IIIwould place two units of Harris Plant on the 230 KV system and the other two units on the 500 KV system.
This alternative would require two 500 KV lines and six 230 KV lines from Harris as shown in Pigure 8.7-3.
To form Harris 500 KV transmission, the Wake-Erwin section of the Wake-Richmond 500 KV Line would be looped into the Harris Plant.
To form the Harris 230 KV transmission, sections of the area 115 KV transmission lines that have already been converted to 230 KV would be looped into Harris Plant.
The 230 KV lines will follow the routes of the 115 KV lines as far as possible and utilize the existing rights-of-way.
This alternative would require a total of 5,157 acres of transmission right-of-way with only 3,672 acres being new.
Of the 3,672 acres of new right-of-way, a maximum of 2,185 acres will be cleared.
The re-maining new right-of-way will be subject to selective clearing.
Experience indicates that 85K of the property crossed will be wooded.
Plans I and II each require three new 500 KV lines to be constructed on new routes using new rights-of-way.
In addition each of these plans require that
'two new 500/230 KV substations be installed.
Plan III, however, requires only two new 300 KV lines which are terainated at existing 300/230 KV snhsta-tions.
Plan IIItotal right-of-way acreage requirements are 800 acres less than the other two plans and this fact indicates that this plan makes optimum use of existing rights-of-way and minimizes land use requirements.
8.7-4a Amendment No. 64
0 Plan III also minimizes future requirements.
Normal system growth in the late 1970's will require that area 115 KV lines be converted to 230 KV ser-vice.
These lines will be utilized as part of Harris transmission.
In addition, the 500 KV backbone line which will become part of Harris transmission will have to be built in 1985 to meet long-range regional and the Company's internal system requirements, regardless of whether the Harris Plant is built.
This normal growth, without the Harris Plant, will require the utilization of 2,705 new acres of right-oraway, so that by integrating the Harris lines with exf.sting land use
- patterns, only about 991 new acres of new land will actually be necessary.
These figures are shown in Tables 8.7-2 and 8.7-3.
Plan III has been selected as the plan for development of a trans-mission system for Harris Plant.
As stated above, this plan best meets the obgectives for developing a transmission system for a new generating plant, and meets these objectives without duplication of facilities and with a minimum im-pact on the environment.
8.7-4b Amendment No.
64
TABLE 8.7-1 ALTERNATIVE TRANSMISSION LINE VOLTAGE SYSTEMS Effect Considered Plan l Plan II Plan III Number of lines and Voltages Acres of New Right-of-Way Required Number of New 500 KV Substations Estimated Net Present Worthed Annual Cost 3 -500 KV all new 4,514
$99,350,700 3 - 500 KV all new 3 230 KV 4,471
$ 97 P 387 P 300 2 500 KV*
6 230 KV (rebuilding of 115 KV lines) 3,672**
$80,074,100
+Necessary to tie-in with regional planning regardless of existence of Harris Plant
- %f the 3,672 total acres, only 2,185. acres will be completely cleared for construction and access.
- 8. 7-9 Amendment No.
24
TENTATIVE COOLING 'TOWERS ETYtlCAL)
AVXILIARY tONO StlLLWAY
~LANTSITE 00/
%avuv TENTATIVE SERVICE WATER CHANNEL TENTATIVE COOLING TOWER SLOWDOWN LINE war I
NORUAI.
I tONO EI TIIY NO78S SEE FISUjPES B.9 "+ Ail'.8-5 MR /h/5E7 OE7A/LS.
MOST MAINOAM AMENDMENTNO. 28 II TENTATIVE I
MAKEAP'WATER
/
tltEUNE
//////
TENTATIVE
- La tUMtlNGSTATION
'I StlLLWAY
~
I T
S S
S THOUSANOS Ot SEE'T CAROLINAPOWER a LIGHTCOMPANY SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNITS 1, 2, 3 & 4 Environmental Report MAIN RESERVOIR MIXINGAREA SVCKHORN OAU 3.33
0 0
- 4
I
,"r'IV ix')
('Lc ~"
F
~". '" f ~'/c
~I4.).Is
~
, y
~
III Jr
~ ',
K
~ '(
I.
I
. ~LQ>
~ F
~
7 I.
,C.
g Fr q'sr
~
N
~
~r. o r0 rr ~
'0 L
~
~ r Q)
I.
I
~
,'(
~L lrl ii l /
I
/
I y
I/
I/
~,/ /
../
'Vg g/).i gO II
//(
//va f
///.
.I
) ~~/~
y IF I
/~
/
Q(
/( )
%)
~)
g~o'~
).~jr /jr(
AMENOMENTNO. 28
~ I AR M))
CAROLINAPOWER a LIGHTCOMPANY SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNITS 1 ~ 2, 3 & 4 Environmental Report I
/r r
/y ri'(
MAIN RESERVOIR ISOTHERMS ADVERSE WINTER METERO LOG IGAL COND ITIONS II i 3.3-4
0
k "QL
~Vk I
cIi vI
~
y IQ h
IQ jkg Ihrr /
- (( I'i rQ
'r-v' rI
/ JI J
.'(
I'
./II ) j l
C
~N j'gx
)
('/
r
(
)Ly I
~4
- Ji l
AMENDMENTNO. 28 i/I/~~
I
.1 3 )~j'/
I I
ir (
(~
)+C
/
CAROLINAPOWER & LIGHTCOMPANY SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNITS 1, 2, 3 & 4 Environmental Report MAIN RESERVOIR ISOTHERMS ADVERSE SUMMER METEOROLOG ICALCONDITIONS 3.3-5
Question 3:
Provide further description of the nature and operation of VACAR and
- SERC, including a) member commitment in terms of reserve margin requirement, and b) planning and coordinating functions.
Answer:
CPGL is not a member of any power pool; however, CP&L is a member of the Southeastern Electric Reliability Council (SERG), which was established in January 1970 as one of the nine members of,the National Electric Reliability Council (NERC).
NERC was formed in'968 with the stated purpose:
"...to further augment the reliability and adequacy of bulk power supply in the electric utility systems of North America."
NERC encompasses essentially all of the power systems of the United States and the Canadian systems in Ontario, British Columbia, Manitoba, and New Brunswick (Figure Attached).
The stated purpose of the SERG Agreement is to "augment further the reliability and adequacy of bulk power supply in the areas served by the Member Systems."
To this end, the Council will:
(a)
Encourage the development of reliability and adequacy arrangements among the systems within'he region; (b)
Exchange information with respect to planning and operating matters relating to the reliability and adequacy of bulk power supplies; (c)
Review, periodically, activities within the region on reliability and adequacy; (d)
Provide information with respect to matters considered by the Council, where appropriate, to the Federal Power Commission and to other Federal and state agencies concerned with reliability and adequacy.
SERG is composed of four sub-regions:
Florida, Southern Companies, Tennessee Valley Authority, and Virginia-Carolinas.
CP6L is a part of the Virginia-Q3-1 Amendment No.
64