ML18227D286
| ML18227D286 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Turkey Point |
| Issue date: | 01/21/1977 |
| From: | Robert E. Uhrig Florida Power & Light Co |
| To: | Lear G Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| L-77-30 | |
| Download: ML18227D286 (11) | |
Text
NRCFoAM 195 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION I2.7S)
NRC DISTRIBUTION FoA I'ART50 DOCI(ET MATERIAL DOCKET NUMIIEA Qo
+50 E/
FILE NUMQL'A Mr Lear 1%.ETTL A Pf0 A IG INAL~
Qcopv
.QNOTORIZED
'tFUNC LASSIF I E D PROP Florida Power
& Light Co Miami, Fla R E Uhrig INPUT FORM DATE OF DJCVtfflT DATE RECEIVED l NUMOEANF COPIES RECEIVED I,!'ne.Signed DESCRIPTION Ltr re our NRC.request....trans the following:
lp ENCLOSU RF Addi* info re steam'Generator,Tube Integrity
.:~..(40 cys encl rec'd) 6p:.
PLANT 1~~7:
Turkey Point 83.& 4 SAFETY ASSXGHED AD:
Ilgwu g~g
~
PRO J~EC IIAHA+~H LXC ASST FOR ACTION/I r
2)O"<2'az~app ACK+OQTLEDGED N F0 RMATION PROJECT 19 NAGER LTO ASST RE, e
X&E(g OELD
/ GOSSXCK & STAFF MIPC CASE HAHAUER IIARLESS PROJECT MANAGEMENT BOYD INTERNALD
'SYSTEMS SAFETY 11EXIiEMAN SCIEROEDER ENGINEERING MACARRY KHXG11T SIIItKIL PACILIC K REACTOR SAFE ROSS ISTR I BUTION PLANT "SYSTEMS TEDESCO IPPOLXTO OPERATXNG REACTORS STELLO OPERATING TECIi, EISEh1IUT S
TP~SAFR ~
I
~ LYS
~F.NV 0
ERNST BALLARD..
SPANGLER SXTE TECII GAIPELL STEPP P,
COLLINS 1IOUSTON PETERSON MELTZ 111'.LTEMES S KOVIIOLT LPDR TXC:
NSXC:
NOVAK ROSZTOCZY CIIECK AT& I SALTZMAN RUTBERG EXTEHNALDISTRIBUTION NAT~LAB
~hE BUTf.E
~lWOI:IM,YNIHAT.MAIL
~ULR KSON {ORSL)
HULlIAN SXTE ANALYSIS VOLLIIER BUNCH J ~ COLLINS KREGER NTROL NUMBER ASLB:
CONSULTANTS:
- EI T A~ elm NAC FOAM 196 (2.70)
AORS 74 CYS Her;DTNG/
77
FLORIDAPOWER & LIGHTCOMPANY pr tLlegulato5 Docket. I'ILe January 21, 1977 L-77-30 Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Attention:
Mr. George Lear, Chief Operating Reactors Branch 53 Division of Operating Reactors U.
S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.
C.
20555
Dear Mr. Lear:
Re:
Turkey Point Units 3 and 4
Docket Nos.
50-250 and 50-251 Steam Generator Tube Integrity Su 1cmental 'In'fo'rma't'io'n 9
1 cQ CP~%4'4 The attached information is submitted in response to a request from your staff. It supplements previous information submitted in our letters L-76-432, L-76-434, and L-77-3.
Very truly yours, Robert E. Uhrig Vice President REU/MAS/ms Attachment cc:
Norman C. Moseley, Region II Robert Lowenstein, Esquire me~
//pq'~'l,s CO~iS I
886 PEOPLE... SERVING PEOPLE
r V
~
(,
s~
J
'h
),
l P
ATTACHMENT'urkey Point Units 3 and 4
Request for Information Steam Generator Tube Inte rit Q13. Provide a tabulation summary of the total strains in the circumferential, longitudinal and radial direction at the U-bend apex for tubes at flow slot locations in rows 1 to 4.
The summary should indicate the effects due to manufacturing, service induced ovality (hourglassing).,
change in U-bend radius, operating thermal and pressure loads and accident loads.
Also compute the effective strains at the U-bend apex.
Clari'fication of above question.
a.
Provide the requested tabulation for a total, of 32 tubes (eight tubes adjacent to the flow slot in rows
. 1 through 4.)
b.
For the tubes in row 1 provide the requested tabulation for the following two cases.
(1)
Flow slot hourglassing based on current, field data for the top support plate in Steam Gener-ator 4B (2)
Assuming-full closure of the flow slot c.
For those tubes in rows 2, 3 and 4 provide the requested tabulation assuming full closure of the flow slot.
N A13. As indicated in our response to Question li the operating thermal.
,and pressure strains are trivial and can, be neglected..
Similarly, the strains due to 'SSE and other accident loads are quite small and are effectively zero when compared to those due to hourglassing.
Our table will onlv. include manu-facturing and in-service (hourglassing)'trains and'a summation for each quantity requested.
The summation is. inclusive of operating and accident conditions.
TABLE 1 RON 1 9 CURRENT HOURGLASSING (UNIT 4) saxial 6
hoo radial 8e u.
~
~
Mfg.
Column
.177
.004
.040
.133 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 H
T H
T H
T H
T H
T H
T H
T
.014
.191
.013
.190
.012
.189
.010
.187
.007
. 184
.004
.121 7
.177
.008
.012
.009
.013
.009
.013
.008
.012
.004
.008
.003
.007
.004
.004
.044
-.004
.044
.004
-.044
.003
.043
-.002
.042
.001
.041
.040
. 141
,140
.140
.138
. 137
.134
.133
. 133
- No Leg Displacement H Strains due to hourglassing T Total Strains
I
TABLE 2 ROW 1 9 PULL CLOSURE Mfg.
Column
.177
.004
.040 85 86 87 88 89 90 H
T H
T H
T H
T H
T
.044
.221
.043
.220
.038
.215
.031
.208
.023
.200
.012
.189
. 043
.047
.043
.047
.039
.043
. 032
.036
.019
.023
.009
.013
.014
.054
.014
-.054
.012
-.052
.010
.050
.007
.047
-.004
.044 91 92 H
T
.177
.177
.004
.004
.040
-.040
- No Leg Disp1acement H Strains due to hourglassing T Total Strains
TABLE 3 ROW 2 9 FULL CLOSURE
~axial
<hoo
< a Mfg Column
.112
.003
.030'085 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 H
T H
T H
T H
T H
T H
T H
T
.022
.134
.022
.134
.021
.133
. 018
.130
.013
.125
.008
.120
.112
.034
.037
.034
.037
.027
.030
.021
.024
.011
.014
.006
.009
- PP3
~ 00
- pp4
.007
-.024
.054
.023
.053
.021
.051
-.018
.048
-. 013
.043
-. 008
.030
.030
.109
.108
.106
.104
.099
.093
.085
.085
- No Leg Displacement H Strains due to hourglassing T Total Strains These strains result from dimensions taken from the removed tubes.
A possible explan-ation is that these tubes had higher ovality, as manufactured, than the statistical average.
TABLE 4 ROW 3
9 FULL CLOSURE Mfg.
c I
Column axial
.082 hoo
.005
.020 85 86 87 88 89 90 H
T H
T H
T H
T H
T
.015
.097
.015
.097
.013
.095
.Oll
.093
.009
.091
.005
.087
.018
.023
.018
.023
.013
.013
.009
.014
.004
.009
.001
.006
.024
.044
-. 023
-.043
-.021
-.041
.017
.037
.012
.032
-.006
.026 92 H
T
.082
.005
..020
," No Leg Displacement:
H Strains due to hourglassing T Total Strains
~ ~
~
~
4
~
TABLE 5 ROW 4 9 FULL CLOSURE Mfg.. c Column axial
.064 hoo
.002
.020 85 87 89
.H T
H T
H T
H T
.012
.076
.012
.076
.011
.075
.010
.074
.007
.014
.016
. 014
.016
.011
.013
.007
.009
.003
.024
.044
.023
-.043
-.021
-.041
-.017
.037
-.012 90 91 H
T H
T
. 004
.068
.064
.002
.004
. 002.
.007
.027
-.020 92
- 064
.002
.020
- - No Leg Displacement H Strain due to hourglassing T Total Strain
~ ~
~
~
~
~
K, 1
~u t'