ML18192C064
| ML18192C064 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Palo Verde  |
| Issue date: | 07/11/2018 |
| From: | Arizona Public Service Co |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| 10.1-9 | |
| Download: ML18192C064 (1) | |
Text
PVNGS-1,2&3 ER COOLING SYSTEM ALTERNATIVES Table 10.1-9 BASIC TABULATION TO BE USED IN COMPARING ALTERNATIVE PLANT SYSTEMS (Sheet 1 of 7)
Alternatives Incremental Generating Cost Present Worth Annualized Rectangular Mechanical Draft Cooling Tower System Base Base Round Mechanical Draft Cooling Tower System
+16,500,000
+1,490,000 Wet-Dry Mechanical Draft Cooling Tower System
+416,000,000
+36,270,000 Fan-Assisted Natural Draft Cooling Tower System
+32,000,000
+2,790,000 Environmental Costs 1.
NATURAL SURFACE WATER BODY 1.1 Consumptive use 1.1.1 People 1.1.2 Agriculture 1.1. 3 Industry 1.1.4 Annual maximum consumptive use of waste-water 1.2 Other impacts 1.3 Combined or inter-active effects 1.4 Net effects Units Gal/yr water withdrawn from drinking water supplies Acre feet water/yr withdrawn from agri-'ultural usage Gal/yr withdrawn from industry Acre ft wastewater per year required from 91st Ave Wastewater Treatment Plant Magnitude 75,800 None None See sections 5.7 and 10.1.4.2 Reference 10.1.4.1 10.1.4.1 10.1.4.1 10.1.4.1 Magnitude 75,800 None None See sections 5.7 and 10.1.4.2 Reference 10.1.4.1 10.1.4.1 10.1.4.1 10.1.4.1 Magnitude 49,900 None None See sections 5.7 and 10.1.4.2 Reference 10.1.4.1 10.1.4.1 10.1.4.1 10.1.4.1 Magnitude 75,800 None None See sections 5.7 and 10.1.4.2 Reference 10.1.4.1 10.1.4.1 10.1.4.1 10.1.4.1 10.1-31/10.1-32 (Blank)