ML18192A294
| ML18192A294 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Palo Verde  |
| Issue date: | 12/11/1974 |
| From: | Van Brunt E Arizona Nuclear Power Project |
| To: | Muller D US Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) |
| References | |
| Download: ML18192A294 (6) | |
Text
0 AEC DISTRIBUTION FOR PART 50 DOCKET MATERIAL (TEMPORARY FORM)
CONTROL NO:
12689 FILE FROM: Arizona Nuclear Power Pro Phoenix, Ariz TO:
Mr. Daniel R. Huller DATE OF DQC 12-1.1-74 ORIG 1-signed DATE R EC'D LTR TWX RPT OTHER 12-16-74 CC.
OTHER XXXX SFNT AEC PDR xxxx SENT LOCAL PDR CLASS UNCLASS PROPINFO XXXXX INPUT NO CYS REC'D 1
DOCKcT NO STN 50-528 529, 6 50-530 DESCRIPTION:
Ltr ref their Dec,2, 1974 ltr concerning the applicant,
~ ~ ~ further info concerning Environmental Review of i!he PVNGS" application is now being presented, CLOSURES ACKNOWLEDGE>
.DO NOT REMOV>
PLANT NAihlE:
Palo Verde 1 thru 3 FOR ACTION/INFORMATION 12" 18 "74 JG3 BUTLER (L)
'W/ Copies CLARK (L)
W/ Copies PARR (L)
W/ Copies KNIEL (L)
W/ Copies SCH'~VENCE R (L)
W/ Copies STOLZ (L)
W/ Copies VASSALLO {L)
W/ Copies PURPLE (L)
W/ Copies Zl EivlAiJill (L)
EGAN (E) 1;V/ Copies W// Copies DICKER (E)
LEAR (L)
W/ Copies W/ Copies KIYIIGHTOill{E)
W/ Copies W/ Copies YOUiIIGBLOOD(E)
W/ Copies W/ Copies INTERNALDISTRIBUTION WEC PDR OGC, ROQ'1 P-oOGA
~UNTZli~IG/STAFF CASE GIAMBUSSO BOYD
'MQORE (L) (BVJR)
~EYOUNG (L) {PWR)
SKOVHOLT (L)
GOLLER (L)
P. COLLINS DP NISE
~EG OPR FILE 8i REGION {%
MOR RIS STEE,LE TECH REVIE",J SCHROEDE R MACCARY KNIGHT PAiVLICKI SHAO STE LLO HOUSTON NOVAK ROSS IPPO LITO TEDESCO LONG LAINAS BFNAROYA VO Llii'IE R DENTON GR liliES.
GAi'~ii~iiI LL K~TNER v&LLARD SPANGLER ENVIRO MULLER DICKER KNIGHTON YOUNGBLOOD RAGA!'ll PROJECT LDR(~(
~. aAw MARLFSS LIC ASST Dl'GGS (L)
GEARIN (L)
GQULBQURNE (L)
KREUTZER (E)
LEE (L)
MQIGRET (L) vtfEED (E)
SERVICE (Lj SHEPPARD (L)
SLATER (E)
SMITH (L)
TEETS (L)
WI LLIAiXIS(E)
WILSON {L)
A/T IND B RAIT!.IAi~l
~.
SA LTZi'~JAN B. HURT P
NS CDQN' CHAP'iIA:YI DUBE w/input E. COUPE D. THO!l.iPSGi~I {2)
KLFCKER EISENHUT EXTERiNAL DISTR I BUTIQiII 1
1 1
.1 6 LOCALp Dq Phoenix, +irz TIC IABERNATHYI ~1lIBH+Sl NATIOikALLABS~A NSIC (BUCHrailir>i l~
ASLBPIE
'J Bltlg, Rni 529)
ASLB IV. PENNIINGTON. Rr
> E-20l GT Ne:. ton Ands. son
- B&.'illS".Ii~.'cBROr".D, Rm E.201 GT
'ACRS i!QLDIXG",
1 CONSULT-'.'TS NEi.Vi';IARK3LU.'.!E>AGBABIAii P
1 1
1 1
PD R SAN/LA'/NY BROQKIIriJEiII.-'~'i i LrXB G
ULR'I'~SOI~J 0 ~ L AG'iED (RUTH CUSS;,.!;.,
Rrn'B-127 GT R. D. hiUELLER, Rn'".".Oi; r'T
P V
~
~
~
~
~
~
N
~
~
l00% Rt'CYCLO PAPER ARIZONANUCLEAP POWER PROJECT Post Office Box 21666 oenix, Arizona 85036
~t
~
.Fib Cy.
ANPP-1609 December 11, 1974 ptf
~y<4l Mr. Daniel R. Muller Assistant Director Environmental Projects U.
S. Atomic Energy Commission Washington, D.
C.
20545
SUBJECT:
Docket Nos.
STN 50-528 STN 50-529 STN 50-530
,cg~po U."4.=C
~6>974 jo
,"..- L~lpRy hvlit SEcrfoN
"+hT CLERg
REFERENCE:
(A)
AEC Letter of November 5, 1974 RE Pathogenic Virus Effects (B)
AEC Letter of December 4,
1974 RE Coal Alternative (C)
ANPP-1579 Letter of December 2,
1974 RE Reference (A)
Dear Mr. Muller:
This letter is submitted to confirm the position of,the applicant, Arizona Public Service Company, stated at our meeting on December 5,
1974 with members of your staff and representatives of the Department of Interior ("DOI").
There are three outstanding items in the environmental review of the PVNGS application:
l.
Analysis of pathogenic virus effects from, cooling tower drift (see References (A) and (C)).
2.
Additional data to evaluate use of coal's an alternate fuel '(see Reference (B)~)'.
3.
Changes in the Arizona transmission system described at our meeting of December 5,
1974.
Data respecting these outstanding items cannot be submitted in time to permit incorporation in the PVNGS Draft Environmental Statement
("DES")
unless the issuance of the-DES is deferred beyond'he date originally scheduled.
ANPP participants:
Arizona Public Service Company
~ Tucson Gas h Electric Company Salt River Project
~ Public Service Company of New Mexico
~ EI Paso Electric Company
0
)4 I '
Mr. Daniel R. Muller U. S. Atomic Energy Commission ANPP-1609 December 11, 1974 Page Two k'
r~
l; I,
!'ccordingly, the Applicant considers that issuance of the DES on January 6, 1975, would be premature, would result in unnecessary confusion and misunderstanding and would not provide adequate opportunity for the several offices in the DOI to prepare meaningful input for the DES nor permit adequate consideration of any concerns which may arise with respect to the alternate transmission system.
It is the Applicant's view that adherence to the original schedule is likely to result in unnecessary delay of the total review process.
DOI has committed to expedite its review and to meet a schedule under which the DES would be deferred not more than forty-five days and recognizing that DOI has valid jurisdictional interests respecting the transmission system which cannot be adequately addressed within the current review schedule, we urge the Commission to defer the issuance of the DES for a period of forty-five days from its original schedule date.
A deferral of this nature will permit the AEC to resolve the other two outstanding items (Reference A and B) before release of the DES and not jeopardize the schedule for plant construction.
If we can be of any further assistance to you or if further clarification of our position is desired, please let us know.
Very truly yours,,
ARIZONA'UBLIC SERVICE COMPANY By Edwin E.
Van Brunt, Jr.
Vice President, Nuclear Services EEVBJr/iHP/jk cc:
i0.
H.
Regan B. Blanchard
I I
(
P 1
I
%E