Text

Response to License Amendment Request (LAR) for Review and Approval of Relocation of the Reactor Core Isolation Cooling (RCIC) Injection Point NRC Request for Additional Information (RAI)
	ML18172A142
Person / Time
Site:	River Bend
Issue date:	06/21/2018
From:	Maguire W; Entergy Operations
To:	; Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
	RBG-47876
	Download: ML18172A142 (136)
	v • d • e

{{#Wiki_filter:* ~. Entergx RBG-47876 June 21, 2018 Attn: Document Control Desk U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852-2738 Entergy Operations, Inc. fllver Btmd SI"tIOIl 1 In" 1 J S 1 IIqllW ly i.J 1 N .;, f I 1fll"I,.. ;vtlll) l/\\ lUI i ' 1,'1 ;)" 1/11 11/1 William F. Maguire d VII;' I', '.'1ld"111 '1:1 B'lld I.ltl.l

SUBJECT:

Response to License Amendment Request (LAR) for Review and Approval Of Relocation Of The Reactor Core Isolation Cooling (RCIC) Injection Point NRC Request for Additional Information (RAI) River Bend Station, Unit 1 Docket No. 50-458 License No. NPF-47 RBF1-18-0136

References:

1) Entergy Letter: License Amendment Request (LAR) (RBG-47823 dated January 29, 2018) (ADAMS Accession No. ML18029A187)

2) NRC email: River Bend Station, Unit 1, Request for Additional Information dated May 24,2018 (ADAMS Accession No. ML18149A288)

Dear Sir or Madam:

In Reference 1, Entergy Operations, Inc (Entergy) submitted a request for the review and approval of relocation of the Reactor Core Isolation Cooling (RCIC) Injection Point from the Reactor Vessel Head Spray Nozzle to the 'A' Feedwater Line via the 'A' Residual Heat Removal (RHR) Shutdown Cooling Return Line. In an email dated May 24, 2018, (Reference 2) the NRC staff made a request for additional information (RAI). needed to complete the license amendment request. Enclosure 1 provides the responses to the RAls. Enclosure 2 contains the pipe stress calculation updates AX-002H, AX-071AG, AX-076A, and AX-076B. This letter does not contain any new commitments. If you require additional information, please contact Mr. Tim Schenk at (225)-381-4177 or tschenk @entergy.com. In accordance with 10 CFR 50.91(b)(1), Entergy is notifying the State of Louisiana and the State of Texas by transmitting a copy of this letter to the deSignated State Official.

RBG-47876 Page 2 of 2 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on June 21,2018. Sincerely, l WFM/BAJ : Responses to Request for Additional Information : Pipe stress calculation updates AX-002H, AX-071 AG, AX-076A, and AX-076B cc: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region IV 1600 E. Lamar Blvd. Arlington, TX 76011-4511 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Ms. Lisa M. Regner, Project Manager 09-0-14 One White Flint North 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MO 20852 NRC Senior Resident Inspector Attn: Mr. Jeff Sowa 5485 U.S. Highway 61, Ste. NRC St. Francisville, LA 70775 Department of Environmental Quality Office of Environmental Compliance Radiological Emergency Planning and Response Section Ji Young Wiley P.O. Box 4312 Baton Rouge, LA 70821-4312 Public Utility Commission of Texas Attn : PUC Filing Clerk 1701 N. Congress Avenue P. O. Box 13326 Austin, TX 78711 -3326

RBG-47876 Page 1 of 3 RBG-47876 Responses to Request for Additional Information

RBG-47876 Page 2 of 3 REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RELOCATION OF THE REACTOR CORE ISOLATION COOLING (RCIC) INJECTION POINT RIVER BEND STATION, UNIT 1 DOCKET NO.: 50-458

Background

By letter dated January 29, 2018, Entergy submitted a license amendment application. The licensee stated that the 6-inch Reactor Core Isolation Cooling (RCIC) system injection line is routed to the 20-inch Feedwater A Loop by tapping into the 10-inch Reactor Heat Removal system shutdown cooling mode return line to feedwater inside the main steam tunnel just south of the jet impingement wall. The staff noted that the piping system has to be qualified in accordance with ASME Code Section III requirements and meet 10 CFR 50.55(a) and relevant GOCs. The staff requests the licensee to address the following items related to the piping analysis: Question a Piping analysis model: The staff noted that this change affects 3 different systems. Figure 3A.24-1 of USAR provides RCIC piping system used in analysis of water hammer loads. The staff noted that the piping model does not appear to address the RHR piping. Please explain. Also, describe the piping model used for other load cases. Response to Question a PX-1037 was updated with the modification and contains the water hammer analysis of the RCIC Piping; PX-1 000 was updated and contains the water hammer analysis for the feedwater piping. Both analyses were updated to show injection into Residual Heat Removal (RHR) piping RHS-010-065 that connects to the Feedwater Mixing Tee and Feedwater Line FWS-020-047. Line RHS-01 0-065 is the only portion of the RHR system piping that is impacted by the RCIC reroute modification as it is protected from backflow by check valve E12-VF050A and the normally closed isolation valve E12-MOVF053A (ref. PIO-27-07A). Standard Load Cases for the requested RCIC and RHR system piping are provided in the response to Question b below. Additional analyses performed as a result of MR96-0069 can be provided on request. Question b Please provide the piping stress summary for RCIC and RHR systems. Response to Question b Pipe stress calculation updates to the affected RCIC and RHR piping as a result of MR96-0069 are provided in Enclosure 2: AX-002H, AX-071 AG, AX-076A, and AX-076B.

RSG-47876 Page 3 of 3 Question c Please discuss any thermal mode or transient changes and loading condition changes since the Cumulative Usage Factors (CUFs) and stresses are shown to lessen from previous values as specified below:

1.

Table 3.6A-9a of the USAR lists the CUFs and the stresses for the feedwater system inside containment. The NRC staff noted that there is no routing change inside containment. Please explain what causes the reduction in stresses and CUFs.

2.

Table 3.6A-10a of the USAR lists the stresses for the feedwater system outside of containment. The NRC staff noted that there is no routing change for the feedwater system outside of the containment. Please explain what causes the reduction in stresses. Response to Question c Part 1 Stress and CUF were calculated in AX-017D revision 3K as part of the RCIC Reroute modification MR96-0069. The fluid transient load case used in this calculation update is based on RSS calculation PX-1000 Rev. 2 (also revised with MR96-0069) curves which are smaller than the design loads of PX-1 000 Rev. 1 used in the previous analysis. The transient loads have reduced as a result of installing a nozzle check valve FWS-V3052 into the Feedwater system with MR96-0069. This nozzle check valve has a faster closing time compared to the previously modeled swing check valves. The reverse flow when the nozzle check valve closes would be lower producing smaller fluid transient loads. Smaller transient loads result in lower stress and fatigue values. This revision also incorporated and superseded 6 additional addenda and markups of calculation AX-017D that were unrelated to the RCIC Reroute modification. The changes included a temperature change, piping schedule changes, a change in valve weight, and a change in damping curves that are unrelated to the changes made by modification MR96-0069; these incorporated changes may also have impacted the stress and CUF results. Response to Question c Part 2 See the response to Part 1 above. Note: The break points shown in current USAR Table 3.6A-1 Oa have since been updated and no longer reflect the values changed by the subject RCIC modification MR96-0069.

RBG-47876 Page 1 of 131 RBG-47876 Pipe stress calculation updates AX-002H, AX-071 AG, AX-076A, and AX-076B

ENTERGY. TITLE: CALCULATION COVER PAGE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT RIVER BEND STATION Stress Analysis for Main Steam Vent Line per MR 96-0069. SUPERSEDES: N/A .................................................... ~~..... '.......................................... "...... SUPPLEMENTS: AX-2H Rev. 3 CALCULATION STATUS: o APPROVED

PENDING o CANCELED SYSTEM NO.: 209 MARK NO.:

CLASSIFICATION:

SAFETY RELATED NON-SAFETY RELATED: 0 QAPA o NON-QAPA U.n.Jc'U'",,! SCOPE I OBJECTIVE:

To document the cbanges implemented by MR 96-0069. This MR re-routes tbe RCIC injection from the reactor vessel bead to the feedwater nozzle. As a result of this change~ line ICS-006-6-1 (previously qualified in AX-76A) is removed from the vent and spray assembly. CONCLUSION: The changes implemented by MR 96-0069 do not affect the piping qualified in AX-2H. The vent and spray assembly is now solely qualified by AX-2H. RPV nozzle numbe~7 and the vent and spray assembly remain qualified since the removal of line ICS-006*6-1 reduces the loads acting on the vent and spray assembly. ARE USED FOR Manufacturer: RECEIVED JUN 0 9 1998 ONO SDDF#: N/A Name

YersionlRelease No.

CONFIRMATIONS REQUIRED: 0 YES

NO CONFIRMATION COMPLETE: 0 YES 0 NO 0 N/A KEYWORDS:

RPV Vent Line, MR 96-0069, RCIC, RPV nozzle 0~ ~< b-21-91 (SignaturelDate ) Preparer Camilo Cuadra, KCN 0969 REVIEW & APPROVAL t~dWL 6-)3-97 (SignaturelDate) o Reviewer (Non-Safety) . GrDesign Verification Reviewer Lothar Kuhn, KCN 1105 Supervisor (Printed Name, KCN, or SSN) WtSk G'vfTA* J 1051

RBG-47876 Page 3 of 131 -

===~ ENTERGY SECTION N/A N/A 1.0 3.0 N/A CALCULATION ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT RIVER BEND STATION CALC. NO. - REV. ADDENDIJM AX-2H Rev. 3C ATTACHMENT NO.: JBINO.* PAGE 2 OF Stress Analysis fOT Main Steam Vent Line per MR 96-0069 TABLE OF CONTENTS DESCRIPTION REVISION mSTORY APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS ISOME1RICS CALCULATION CHECKLIST DESIGN VERlFICA TION CHECKLIST Total Pages: 7 PAGE NO. 3 4 5 6 7

RBG-47876 Page4-r~==~ ____ '-__________________________________ '-______________________ -T ENTERGY* 3C CALCULATION ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT RIVER BEND STATION All Stress Analysis for Main Steam Vent Line per MR 96-0069 REVISION mSTORY Description of Change To document the changes implemented by rvlR 96-0069. This MR re-routes the RCIC injection from the reactor vessel head to the feedwater nozzle. As a result of this change, line ICS-006-6-I (previously qualified in AX-76A) is removed from the vent and spray assembly.

RBG-47876 Page 5 of 131 - CALCULATION CALC. NO. - REV. ADDENDUM. AX-2H Rev.3C =~ ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ATTACHMENT NO.: -~--- RIVER BEND STATION JBINO.: ENTERGY PAGE 4 OF Stress Analysi.s for Main Steam Vent Line per MR 96-0069 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS L APPLICABLE CODES, STANDARDS, & REFERENCES (NON-RBS):

1. ASME Boiler ~ Pressure Vessel Code, Section m, Division 1, 1974 Edition IL RBS

REFERENCES:

1. MR 96-0069

2. AX-76A Rev. 3E llL AFFECTED DOCUMENTS:

DOC. NO. REV. DOCUMENT TITLE AFFECT CHANGE NO. (Superseded, Revised, Initiated, etc.) DOC.

RBG-47876 Page 6 ~.~--:;::C-:-:A-;-L-::C;;:UL;;-:A-::::T:::IO::::::N:;::W;:-:O;:::RK::::-::S:::HE;:::::E=

T:-r-;::;;~~~~~;-;:;--,

ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ENTERGY RIVER BEND STATION V'\\ 'v. ~ -

RBG-47876 Page 7 of 131 e ENTERGY YES NO )( X X X X X" '")('

x

)( >c X X X X X X X _'X X CALCULATION CALC. NO. - REV. ADDENDUM AX-2H Rev.3C ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ATIACHMENT NO.: RIVER BEND STATION JBINO.: PAGE 6 OF CALCULATION. CHECKLIST N/A FORMAT EDP-AA-20 SECI10N Cover Page completed. 6.4.1 Table of Contents completed (as required). 6.4.2 Revision History Sheet completed (as required). 6.4.3 X Revisions are identified with revision lines in right margin. 6.4.3 Applicable Documents Page completed. 6.4.4 X Definitions established (as required). 6.4.5 Calculation/revision/addendwnlpage numbers are identified correctly. 6.4.10 CONTENTS Previous calculation for the required analysis exists. 6.3 Calculation is appropriately titled for the intended scope. 6.4.1-2 Purpose and scope are clearly and adequately established. 6.4.1-7,7.1 Safety classification is correct for the identified scope. 6.4.1-6 Topics/documents/equipment for cross-reference/retrieval are identified. 6.4.1-11 Calculation is clear and comprehensible. 6.1 Applicable codes, standards, etc. are identified. 6.4.4-1 RBS references are identified. 6.4.4-2 X Affected documents are identified 6.4.4-3 Inputs and sources are identified, appropriate, and correct. 7.2.2-1 X Assumptions are identified and appropriate. 7.2.2-2 X Inputs derived from field walkdown have been witnessed/verified 7.22-5 X Engineeringjudgments are identified and appropriate. 7.2.2-6 X Calculation methodology is identified and supported by technical bases. 7.2.3 Conclusion is appropriate and is justified by calculation. 7.3 X Confirmations are identified and indicated as required on Cover Page. 7.5.7 X Directions for Confirmations are included. 7.5.7-3 Calculation data is appropriately included, attached, or referenced. 7.4 )( Programs and software are identified and have been verified and validated. 8.0 Methods/calculations use to check results are identified and included. Results are accurate and in accordance with the established methodology. X* Certification by Professional Engineer is required. 11.7 VENDOR CALCULATIONS Calculation is performed in accordance with EDP-AA-25. 102 Calculation content and format are acceptable. 10.2 Vendor, preparer, reviewer, and approver are clearly identified. 10.3 Design verification review has been completed (as applicable).

~arer (SignaturelKCN or SSNlDate):

.r. J. 1';.~d. oL..... (0 q b q ) ~-2J~9'1 'Reviewer (SignaturelKCN or SSNlDate):

RBG-47876 Page 1:~t111 * ~ENTERGY CI-ItST) ATTACHMENT I ES-P-002-00 Page 1 of 2 Typical Design Verification Record Page '7 of 7 Document Number AX-2f-1 Revision 3C METHOD Verification methods to be used:

X,'

Design Review Qualification.Testing Alternate Calculations DOCUMENT(S) REVIEWED: (Attach Additional Sheet(s), ifneeded) Document Number Revision Document Title A"X-2H 3 e* fa:: Sh-es ~ Co..l.c..u {o..{*o n ~v--- M (,.i. !l S~M 'Ye,."f-L."~~

SUMMARY

OF REVIEW: (Attach Additional S~eet(s), if needed) Design Verification Completed By, ~ ~ pa~e: (;-23-97 Comment Resolutions ACce~, Date: CupQ Engineering Supervisor ( >h Date: /J-{~-17 ES-P-002, Form No.1, Rev. 6

RBG-478~ Enclosur~ E~TERGY Page 9 of 1~"'- ( Record Revision Notice ENGMSYS AY..- OOc2H _ ADDL Department Document No. Page 1 of ~ JBIX No. RevisionlDate FileNet Location Revision Description Change calculation / addendum status from pending to approved. Reason For Revision MR 96-0069 has been installed. RECE!VED .JUN 2 5 i999 SA TIC Approvals: Originator Date Section Supervisor I

RBG-47876 Page 1 0 of I---::-:;:iiiil: ~ALCULATION COVER PAGE ENGINEERING: D~PARTl\\1ENT RIVER BEND STATION ENTERGY. TITLE: SUPERSEDES: NlA Stress Analysis for Main Steam Vent Line per MR 96-0069. SUPPLEMENTS: AX-2H Rev. 3 CALCULATION STATUS: )(.APPROVED o CANCELED SYSTEM NO.: 209 CLASSlFICATION:

SAFETY RELATED NON-SAFETY RELATED: 0 QAPA PURPOSE / SCOPE I OBJECI'IVE:

To doeoment the changes implemented by MR 96-0069. This MR re-rootes the RCIC injection from the reactor vessel bead to tbe feedwater nozzle. As a result oHbis change, line ICS"(}06-6-1 (previously qualified in AX-76A) is removed from the vent and spray assembly. REC EIVED ,JUN 2 5 i999 CONCLUSION: SA. T1 The changes implemented by MR 96-tJ069 do not affect the piping qualified in AX-2H. The vent and spray assembly is now solely qualified by AX-2H. RPV nozzle numbe~7 and tbe vent and spray ~ssembJy remain qualified since the removal of line ICS-006--6-1 reduces the loads acting on the vent and spray assembly. Manufacturer: RECE~VEO jUN 091998 Name ' VersionlRelease No. CON:FIRMATIONSREQumED: DYES.NO CONFIRMATION COMPLETE: DYES DNO ON/A KEYWORDS: RPV Vent Line, MR 96-0069, RClC, RPV nozzle ~ ~< {'-Z1-91 (SlgnaturelDate ) Preparer camilo Cuadra, KCN 0969 & APPROVAL iczth9t,y ~ 6-21>--97 (Signature/Date) , 0 Reviewer (Non-Safety) ~ign VerificatiOD Reviewer Lothar Kuhn, KCN 1 I OS Supervisor (Printed Name. KCN. or SSN) /UuSk G;vprA'J 1051

~~;~:~~_ F.NT~~GY Page 11 of131 Record Revision Notice ENGMSYS AX-o1/Ab, Document No. Page lof ;z. Department 4-F1t50l/t)+ JBIX No. Revision/Date FileNet Location Revision Description Change calculation / addendum status from pending to approved. Reason For Revision MR 96-0069 has been installed. RECEIVED .JUN 2 5 1999 SA TIC Approvals: Originator Date Section Supervisor Date Page 12 of 131..

==:::8 ENTERGY CALCULATION COVER PAGE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT RIVER BEND STATION TITLE: Pipe stress Analysis for ICS function added through FWS system per MR 96-0069 .,.... "... \\. - ~..",. ' -.,. ~ CALC. NO. - REV. ADDENDUM AX-71AG, Rev. 4-ATTACHMENT NO.: / ~/ao7 _.... '\\,. .m ... ~ 'b~ SUPERSEDES: AX* 71AG Rev. 3 ~...... --I'."..,... ----.. --~..... ~ SUPPLEMENTS: CALCULATION STATUS:

vu.PROVED Y1ffj';~l~~qq o CANCELED SYSTEM NO.: 204, 209 I

MARK NO.: CLASsmCA nON: t&.sAFETY RELATED i NON-SAF.ETY RELATED: DQAPA IRI NON-QAPA I PURPOSE / SCOPE / OBJECfIVE:. -..... ~.

T"'"

...

ft See page 17 IU' 11-;2."7 RECEIVED

.JUN 2 5 1999 t SATle RECEIVED JUN 0 9 1998 SOC' CONCLUSION: This piping analysis demonstrates the acceptability of the piping system within acceptable design limits of ASME Section III Code for MR 96-0069 *. ~.,. - SOFI'WARE USED FOR CALCULATION: IXI YES DNO SDDF#: 6%%9.400-100-o01A Manufacturer: Bechtd . _.. ~lJ!le MEIGl Venioll!Release No. N4 '"':"C'- CONFIRMATIONSREQ~1): OY.ES..... ml.NQ.1 CONFIRMATION COMPLETE: DYES DNO IX) N/A KEYWORDS: pipe. stress calculation, MR 96-0069 REVIEW & APPROVAL r-.. ..cr:::..~-

.@!6"fd'~ ~~

6/i&/97 1~!~h~~~I'I-~.. ~n U<Signature.IDate) (SignatureIDate) IItWnate)

s Prepare:r o Reviewer (Non-Safety) upetV150T (Printed Name. KCN. or SSN)

~esign Verification Reviewer lUjesh Gupta(KCN) I~ Rajni R. Patel (0861) Lothar Kubn(llOS) Page 13 of 131

===~ CALCULATION COVER PAGE CALC. NO. - REV. ADDENDUM AX-71AG. Rev. 4 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ATTACHMENT NO.: I rrfl;)07 ENTERGY RIVER BEND STATION VA' ~\\.P]/;7)( TITLE: Pipe Stress Analysis for les function added through FWS system per SUPERSEDES: AX*71AG Rev. 3 MR96-0069 . -........... # *.,. *.,.,......--...... ~ . 9_..........,..,~~ r ** ~ ~-. --"., Y.'-.-' ~.. SUPPLEMENTS: CALCULATION STATUS: o APPROVED iii PENDING o CANCELED SYSTEM NO.: 204, 209 I MARKNO.: CLASSIFICATION: l&.sAFETY RELATED

NON-SAFETY RELATED: DQAPA IX! NON-QAPA I

PURPOSE I SCOPE I OBJECTIVE: ~. See page;7 fU' 1t-'h" 7 RECEIVED JUN 0 9 1998 SOC' CONCLUSION: nus piping analysis demonstrates the acceptability of the piping system withln acceptable design limits of ASME Section III Code for MR 96-0069.. SOFTWARE USED FOR CALCULATION: iii YES ONO SDDF#: 6229.400-100-00tA Manufacturer. Bechtel Natpe MEtOl ~ *. V~ionIRelease No. N4 CONFIRMATIONS REQUIRED.: 0 YES.. JXl. NQ.I CONFIRMATION COMPLETE: 0 YES ONO IX! N/A KEYWORDS: pipe. stress calculation. MR 96-0069 REVIEW & APPROVAL L"'\\. I~*;. ',G?!B[j'? IE A-. ~~ 6/1&/97 Idt< ~I; Guph" /11-"k-'7 U(SignatureIDate) (SignatureIDate) J.S:.MIn."ture/Date) 's. Preparer o Reviewer (Non*Safety) uperYlSor (Printed Name, KCN, or SSN) "ttDesign Verification Reviewer ~jesh Gupta(KCN) Jnrj Rajni R Patel (0861) Lothar Kuhn(l105)

RBG-47876 Page14ofr1=3~ 1~~ ____ ~ __________________________________ -. __________________ ~

===~ ENTERGY SECTION CALCULA TION ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT RIVER BEND STATION TABLE OF CONTENTS CALC. NO. -REV. ADDENDUM AX-7IAG. Rev." ATfACHMENT NO.: PAGE 2 OF PAGE

1. Title Page......................................................................................................................... 1

2. Table of Contents............................................................................................................. 2-3

3. Revision History............................................................................................................... 4

4. Applicable Documents...................................................................................................... 5-6 Calculation Summary

5. Objective.......................................................................................................................... 7

6. Method of Analysis........................................................................................................... 8-9

7. Conclusion....................................................................................................................... 10

8. Notes............................................................................................................................... 11

9. Assumptions.................................................................................................................... 12 Design Input

10. Isometric Sketch............................................................................................................ 13-21

11. Basic Analytical Oata..................................................................................................... 22-23

12. Valve Oata..................................................................................................................... 24-27

13. Concentrated Weight Data............................................................................................. 28

14. Relative Thennal Anchor Movements............................................................................. 29

15. Relative Seismic Anchor Movements............................................................................. 30*32

16. Thermal Modes.............................................................................................................. 33

17. Fluid Transient Oata....................................................................................................... 34

16. Dynamic Loads.............................................................................................................. 35 Summary of Results

17. Maximum Stress Levels................................................................................................. 36

18. Functional Capability Evaiuation..................................................................................... 37

19. HELB I MELC Evaluation............................................................................................... 38

20. Valve Accelerations........................................................................................................ 39-45 21. Flange Qualiflcatlon........................................................................................................ 46-55

22. Vent & Drain Line Qualification....................................................................................... 56

23. Sleeve Clearance Evaluation.......................................................................................... 57-69

RBG-47876 Page15vr~~ ____ -. ________________________________.-________________ ~ ENTERGY SECTION Checklists CALCULATION ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT RIVER BEND STATION TABLE OF CONTENTS CALC. NO. - REV. DDENDUM AX-71AG, Rev. -' A TIACHMENT NO.: PAGE J OF PAGE

24. Calculation Checklist.............................................................................................. 70

25. Reviewers Checklist.............................................................................................. 71

26. Design Verification Record..................................................................................... 72 Attachments Attachment A............................................................................................................. 1-14 Attachment B............................................................................................................. 1-1221 TOTAL:......... 1307

RBG-47876 Page16orf_13_1~~ ____.-________________________________ -r ______________________ ~ A CALC. NO. - REV. ADDENDUM =!:!::~ ENTERGY Revision No. 4 CALCULATION ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT RIVER BEND STATION REVISION HISTORY AX-7tAG, Rev. " ATTACHMENT NO.: PAGE 4 OF Paragraph Description of Change No. All Per MR 96-0069 the RCIC injection function was added to feedwater system by routing the renumbered RCIC injection line ICS-006-1 01 -2 via RHR line RHS-01 0-65-2 into the West loop feed water line. This revision incorporates all of former stress calc AX-76B into AX-71 AG, except the portion of former line ICS-006-7-' which was cut near node 78 and abandoned in place from node 86 to the penetration Z19.

RBG-47876 Page 17 of 131 CALCULATION ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT RIVER BEND STATION CALC.NO.-RE~ADDENDUM AX-71AG, Rev. 4 ATTACHMENT NO.: ENTERGY PAGE 7 OF APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS I. APPLICABLE CODES, STANDARDS, & REFERENCES (NON-RBS):

1.

ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section III, 1974 edition

2.

ME101 Version N4 Pipe Stress AnalYSis Computer Program

3.

Piping Design and Engineering by ITT Grinnell Industrial Piping, Inc. Fifth Edition

4.

Bergen-Paterson Pipe Supports, Catalog No. 82 II. RBS

REFERENCES:

1.

Pipe stress analysis summary, Calculation No. AX-76B Including Addenda

2.

EDS-ME-014, *Pipe stress Analysis and Pipe Support Design standard"

3.

Specification No. 228.000, Rev. 2 *Piping Engineering and Design"

4.

CHOC-EMTR-601, "Design and Installation of Seismic Small Bore Piping, Instrumentation Tubing & Supports for River Bend", dated Sept. 1980 "5'. EMTR 605-0, "Procedure for Qualification of Flanged Joints for ASME Ill, Class 1, 2, and 3 Piping Systems" -6. CHOC-EMDM 82-BO, *Stress Intensification Factors and Stresses for Reduced Outlet Branch Connections,'

7.

CHOC-EMDM-80-4, Use of Pipe Support Stiffness Values in Pipe Stress analysis

8.

CHOC-EMDM-81 -8, *Valve Modelling Procedure" . 9. LEM-34, "Frequencies and Acceptable Accelerations for Valve Qualification"

10.

Calculation RBI-EQ-352, "Acceptable Acceleration for Manual Valves* -11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

.20.

21.

Calculation RBI-EQ-~16, "Valve Modelling and Acceptable Accelerations" Environmental Design Criteria No. 215.150, Rev. 2 Design Criteria No. 228',010, "Pipe Stress and Pipe Support Design Criteria-Design Criteria No: 220.950/960, -High Energy Line Break Evaluation" Design Criteria No: 220.940, "Moderate Energy Line Crack Evaluation-Une Designation Table Change Notice - LOTCN No.: 97-ICS-01 PICL Change No: AP*71-02 PICl Change No: AP-76-01 PICl Change No: AP-17-01 l ~ Calculation G13.18.1.S*08, Rev. 1, *Peak Spread ARS for Seismic Events Including Curves with N-411-1 Damping-Calculation G13.1B.1.S"09, Rev. 1. *Peak Spread ARS for SRV. Chugging, CO and Pool Swell events Including Curves with N-411-1 Damping"

I RBG-47876 Page 18 of 131 CALC. NO. - REV. ADDENDUM AX-71AG, Rev. 4 ATTACHMENT NO.: CALCULA TION ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT RIVER BEND STATION ENTERGY PAGE ~ OF APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS II. RBS

REFERENCES:

..22. '23.

24.

25.

26.

27.

28.

29.

. 30. . 31.

32.

Calculation PX-334, Rev. 2, "1/2 SSE Structural Seismic Displacements Data and Input Procedure for Piping. Analysis" Calculation PX-SB-316, *Pipe Stress Calc. for Vent, Drain & Instrument Connections' Calculation PX-SB-304, *Pipe Stress Calc for Vent/Drain Connections' Calculation AX-17D, "Pipe Stress Calc. For F.W. PPG. in Reactor & Aux. Bldg" Calculation PX-873, "LPCI Pump Discharge Lines Water Hammer Analysis with Trapped air" Calculation PX-1 037, "Water Hammer Analysis on Reactor Core Isolation Cooling Piping Due to Pump Trip' Calculation PX-897, "RCIC Pump Discharge Lines Water Hammer Analysis with Trapped Air" Calculation PX-1 015, "Fluid Transient on RHS Piping Associated with Check Valve Slam Following a Pump Trip" Calculation PX-1024, "Fluid Transient on RHS Piping Associated with Suppression Pool Cleaning Mode with Trapped Air" Calculation PX-888, "LPCI Pump Discharge Line Water Hammer Analysis with Trapped Air for Mode 8" Calculation PX-1005, "Water Hammer Analysis on RHR PIping Une During Shutdown Cooling" In. AFFECTED DOCUMENTS: DOC. NO. 013.18.10,3*221 Z-76-2073A AX-76B REV. DOCUMENT TITLE NO. o OA 2 . Pipe Support Pipe Support Pipe Sress AFFECT (Superseded, Revued, Initiated, etc.) Initiated . Supplements Revised CHANGE DOC. MR 96-0069 MR 96-0069 MR 96-0069

RBG-47876 Page 19 of 131 r-~=-----'--------------------------------'------------------~ CALC. NO. - REV. ENTERGY CALCULATION ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT RIVER BEND STATION PURPOSE I SCOPE I OBJECTIVE AX-71AG, Rev." PAGE 7 OF MR 96-0069 reroutes the RCIC Injection Line from its original connection to the RPV Head to the FWS system through a short portion of the RHS piping covered by this AX. The objective of Revision 4 is to evaluate the subject piping for the new function of ICS injection in addition to the existing function of the RHS piping. A new run of6" piping with a new check valve connecting line RHS-010-65-2 to the existing ICS piping is to be added. Since some of the originallCS piping beyond the diversion point is left in place and was downgraded to ASME Class 2. the active ICS line was renumbered from ICS-006-7-1 to ICS-006-101-2. The design pressure in the lines RHS-010-65-2 and WCS-004-22-2 upto the first check valve were reduced from 1885 to 1525 psig. The piping is to be evaluated for thermal. fluid transient. dynamic, and hydrodynamic events associated with both the RHS and ICS system operation. As a consequence, the piping of stress problem 1V<.-71 AG is now being extended top cover the ICS (RCIC) piping back to its nearest anchors. The added piping comprises all of the existing stress problem AX-76B. except the portion beyond the diversion point of which the first 6 ft is remained and the remainder abandoned in place is evaluated in calcualtion AX-76B. There are no support configuration changes; the rerouted ICS runs unsupported from its last existing support to the new check valve at the new junction to the RHS line.

RBG-47876 Page200fr13~1~-=~ ____ r-____________________________________ -. ____ ~~ A CALCULATION CALC.NO.~REV. o::==~ ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AX*71AG, Rev." EtlTERGV RIVER BEND STATION PAGE <2 OF METHOD OF ANALYSIS The ICS piping was originally analyzed for hydrodynamic loads (SRV etc.) because it was connected to the containment penetration Z-19. Now it is connected to the reactor building via the feedwater line and therefore at least some of it has to be analyzed for the ARS transmitted from that end. The fluid transient due to ICS injection is also changed. There is no other physical or operational change to this stress problem. The ICS piping in this stress problem includes eNS piping and tie back into RHS line ofAX*71AG which previously in AX*76B had been modeled as a fictitious anchor. The thermal operating conditions of the incorporated piping from the AX* 768 model have to be incorporated into those of the existing AX-71AG model. ME101 The piping was analyzed using ME101, Version N4. The input files have been annotated with comments describing the changes made from the existing ME101 input file. Such changes cover incorporation into the coding of various notes made in previous revisions as well as the changes/additions due to this Revision. Fluid Transient Input The piping experiences a fluid transient due to RHR injection into the feedwater line and another FT due to les injection into the feedwater line via the RHR line. In order to simplify the analysis by executing it in a single ME101 run, the second fluid transient is appended after the end of the first fluid transient, so that the piping response from the first transient has ceased and then responds to the second transient. The maximum loads of this load case correspond to the envelope of the Individual fluid transient loads. The RCle transient input tile is derived from PX-1037 and run from t=o to *t=0.6 sec; the RHR transient Input file is derived from PX*1015 and is delayed 0.6 sec. To implement this, the time histories of the segments affected by the RHR transient are delayed. The fluid transient model of PX*1 037 uses a preliminary routing of the RCIC line. The final routing breaks up the long north*south segment into a short segment running at 45 deg to this segment and the remainder. It also corrects the length of the west-east segment at EI. 119'*9" from 9 ft to 3 ft. Addendum A to the PX calculation reconciles these differences by recommending an adjustment in the application. This Is implemented by using conservative multipliers for the existing curves as follows: LENGTH ADJUSTMENT SEGMENT PRELIMINARY FINAL FT MODEL CURVE APPLIED CURVE LENGTH (FT) LENGTH (Ff) PIPE NO AX MULTIPLIER SEGMENT NODE X75-X78 9 3 6*6 36 X75 1.0 X79-X80 2.2 N/A 38 X79 0.5 X80-X82 12 9.8 7*2 38 X80 1.0

RBG-47876 Page 21 of 131 r-~~----'--------------------------------.------------------~ CALC. NO. - REV. ENTERGY CALCULATION ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT RIVER BEND STATION METHOD OF ANALYSIS (cont.) Response Spectra Input AX-71AG, Rev. " PAGE 9 OF The ARS input differs from Revision 3 mainly in that N-411 Code case spectra are now replacing 1% 2% spectra; but in addition, the Shield Building spectra are now also included, and no change to the piping mass points Is needed to separate regions affected by Reactor Building spectra from those which experience only Auxiliary Building spectra. The Reactor Building spectra that are picked up from the feedwater line connection have been input as follows: The FWS penetration for AX*170 is at elevation 121 '-6" and is rigidly connected to the drywell wall and the Shield Building wall at that elevation. The drywell wall is a rigid 6 way anchor (AX-170 node 200), while the Shield Building support is a 2 way guide (AX-170 node 183). The Jet Impingement wall also provides 2 way guide support to the Feedwater line at the Auxiliary Building (AX-170 node 280). The Feedwater line runs In the plant global X direction. OBSA analysis uses the alternate Auxiliary Building displacement curves. High energy Line Break has been addressed in the calculation no: 228.850-CBC-2024 Rev. O. Since the flooding has been addressed in the HELB calculation, Moderate Energy Line Crack need not to be considered for this calculation.

RBG-47876 Page 22 of 131 ~~~~.----------~----~ CALCULATION CALC. NO.-REV.

====e ENGINEERING DEPARTJ\\'IENT AX-7lAG. Rev. 4 ENTERGY RIVER BEND STATION PAGE IOOF CONCLUSION The completed analysis shows that the stresses and reactions on the subject piping are within acceptable limits in accordance with the requirements of the ASME Section III Code. Valve accelerations are within acceptable limits. Functional capability has been assured. Stresses on vents, drains, and test connections are within acceptable limits. Sleeve clearances are adequate.

RBG-47876 Page 23 of 131 r-~~---r----------------------------.---------------~ ENTERGY NOTES CALCULATION ENGINEERING DEPARTlVlENT RIVER BEND STATION CALC. NO. - REV. AX-1tAG. Rev. oJ PAGE I j OF

1.

The Coordinate system for all data expressed in the global system is defined as follows: (-X) Is plant *called north W per piping drawing (y) Is vertical *up* (Z) According to right hand rule The local system is defined as follows for straight piping members: (X) Is along the axis of the pipe, positive in the direction of coding. (y) In the plane of the local X-Axis and the global +Y-Axis unless the local X-Axis is aligned with the global Y-Axis; then the local Y-Axis will be parallel to the global X-Axis. (Z) According to right hand rule.

2.

Forces and moments on restraints, supports, and equipment are those imposed by the piping systems O.e., actions, not reactions).

3.

Unless otherwise noted, forces and moments reported at an inline anchor represent the total forces and moments acting upon that anchor considering contributions from piping on all sides of that anchor. Reactions reported on terminal anchors are due to piping shown in this report only. For total reactions, values must be combined with those from continuation summaries shown on isometrics.

4.

Unless otherwise indicated, stresses at intersections have assumed an unreinforced branch connection.

5.

Piping support loads may be found in pipe support summary In Attachment B.

6.

For lines requiring seismic analysis, the reactions reported are cyclic in character, and reactions must be considered as acting in either the positive or negative direction.

7.

On systems requiring time-history dynamic analysis for flow-induced transients, reactions and deflections reported are the maximum values in magnitude. Reactions and deflections that may occur in opposite directions are not reported in this summary, but are available if required.

8.

Abbreviations RH----------Rod Hanger V.C.----Vertical Restraint RZ-- Z-Restraint SX X-Snubber SZ Z-Snubber EI----EJevation S.R. Elb---Short Radius Elbow SH---------Spring Hanger RX-- X-Restraint RSKew----Skewed Restraint SY-- --V-Snubber SSKew-----Skewed Snubber Rdcr-----Reducer

9.

The magnitude of the forces from flow transient PX-1 015 are much larger than those from flow transient PX-888, PX-873, PX-100S and PX*1024. Therefore, flow transient PX-1 015 is enveloping the other transient cases and Is the only one to be considered. in the analysis.

10.

ME101 model and isometric has a small dimensional discrepancy between nodes 330 and 805 which is insignificant.

RBG-47876 Page 24 of 131 ~a~~----------~~--~ CALCULATION CALC. NO. - REV. - ~ ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AX-71AG. Rev. 4 RIVER BEND STATION PAGE IZ OF ENTERGY ASSUMPTIONS The weight of the new 6" check valve is assumed to be 430 lbs.

RBG-47876 Page 25 of 131..-----e---.-------r--------, CALCULA TION CALC. NO. - REV. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AX-71AG, Rev. 4 ---~ EHTERGY WORK SKETCH: RIVER BEND STATION PAGE r30F SHT. i 0; 9 coJ1". A.T '6' I I-R~.C02.'71.1 ~ ~"'T.t. '1" -'---=-l.. ..:,;.:.;~.(i)..::::........:;:.:~-(t~;;.;.::.~~;.;..-1~Q-*... ~~.;0 c:::r' 'e' S~T. 3

RBG-47876 Page 26 of 131 ~~~--~--------------~------~ CALCULATION CALC. NO.-REV. ~ ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AX-7tAG, Rev. 4 ENTERGY RIVER BEND STATION PAGE 140F WORK SKETCH: y $~T. 2 Olt 9 0

RBG-47876 Page 27 of 131 ~~ -~----~------C--A-L-C-U-L-A-T--IO--N------~--~C~AU~.N=O~.-~~~V~.---, ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AX-7tAG, Rev. 4 RIVER BEND STATION PAGE I,OF ENTERGY WORK SKETCH: r X t"O (.... J ~ ~ C\\ ColI t-. I a is I 1/1 1: ~ 1\\

RBG-47876 Page28of~1_3_1~~ ____ r-__________________________________ -r __________________ ~ e ENTERGY WORK SKETCH: CALCULATION ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT RIVER BEND STATION . A-A B-B cofoJ1' *.It.T '0' SHT.3 CALC. NO ** REV. AX-71AG, Rev. 4 PAGE (!J,OF ';'-&T. 4 OF 9

RBG-47876 Page 29 of 131 =~ ENTERGY WORK SKETCH: ~ o -~ -o -1 CALCULA TION ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT RIVER BEND STATION .... f~ '2 CALC. NO. - REV. AX-71AG. Rev. 4 PAGE l7 OF 1'----tII.. X ~.2lT' ns/ UI,.j1':...,. 'E' Sf.'T.4

RBG-47876 Page 30 of 131 e ENTERGY WORK SKETCH: '( z CALCULATION ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT . RIVER BEND STATION I II 2 - 0 / 7 CALC. NO. ~ REV. AX-7lAG, Rev. 4 PAGE ISOF C'4 res -oo~ -f01-2. r-'1 co...,.,.. AT I r:. ' ~ S~T. 7

RBG-47876 Page 31 of 131 ---~ ENTERGY CALCULA TION ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT RIVER BEND STATION WORK SKETCH: y N~--+---X DIREC;ION COSI~E. OF S\\(EW SUPPORTS NODe. '<X 'i'l '<r 47 RSK

9973 --on.T.

48 SSK -*9~76 - .ol90 71 5S~ - ~8¥g

1736 JQlJ 99-;{1 NOTE: ALL S,,-\\USBERS.. - PSA-3

~Vy WA\\..L Ave,. t. :s.,!!S 4*0 ['25 CALC. NO. - REV. AX-7lAG. Rev. 4 PAGEI90F S~T. 7 of 9 T ~Et.. 104-75 HV'( WALL AvCl. t *.6Z.0 NOT£:.: ADD 'X' It-J F='QO~T OF /-JOOE. POliJT FO~ MI:IOI MATU fv(o.oel..

~ ("") CON': r--Q)O CO'-N ~~("") I 0 Q) CD (3 Ol lDeco n:::Wa.. CALCULATION ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT RIVER BEND STATION CALC. "",. AX.1IAG, ~.4 'AC&,.,..., ._)-, a

~
r c;

,--A

~ +:5 @ 4 *5 4 " r~ ~/ (~ / Cl)MTD. ON AX-3011 ND~ H," ~ i*eNS- 00"'415-3(1-) I X. /1O, :li7 '1 = 103'01' l= \\4*o~1 A ANSI TEE @ HODES 35,370 ~E\\DOI.E' e NOOE 443 Cl. lSI CL. 301 lOCHS' P04 -.s ~-2('*) zo NOTE ; ADO 'X' IfrrJ ~f.JTO~ ~ FO ' ~T, TD 47 FOQ """'e 101 MAT"" "-'fO.D8L. CON10.01I AX-i'D (..... 10) c~~ .. 011 SliT. 7 ~' IHl ",-.>}cm*ps.-r ilL 'OHSP Z -.;:;.v 81 '7'-~~ ANCHOR X. " 100..... y": ~/.?" 2' 14*.n

RBG-47876 Page 33 of 131 ---~ ENTERGY CALCULATION ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT RIVER BEND STATION WOQK~KETC~ '5 ~"C. ~.... " \\I .DETAIL A ( £;I-4T. g ) CALC. NO. - REV. AX-71AG, Rev. 4 PAGE2(OF Sj-..{ T. 9 OF 9

NOW NOW SWlC O£SIGN COWPOH£HT PIP£ WAll ClASS cONOIn~s IlEA' IO[NlIfICA lION SIZE tl*H A,aATERtAl ~SS (.. ) (IN) n:... AND ('F) (PSI) GRADE ~ RWS -0(4 2 14. 30( ass 500 '37~ SA/O,"lfea '2 R~S-oI4 -7;-2 ~ , IT 3 1<.1-150 -010 -t.('-2 10..15 -3'-, 48D 700 4 R+-I5 -OIO-~S-.2

S43 92.1 4S0 1725 SA '",,",&:8

,~ I 120 /35 '7 C"-.Js-Do4 -';7--3 4'7 *2~7 SA l or..~~e I{ "'/~:2.1 % sc~ Jt-o ('°5 -218 5,A. I o. "it.Ii 450 1'>>85 If 3t::=>} 7 0/4 SCH 80 1.os. ( ~4 35~ 500 ~ ID "'idl..13 r (5 -oo~ -(Ol-:Z '."2~ 911 450 1 525 ~ 432 SA I OG.~B ~ lCS-oob - &-2 '~(#2 9-21 /7 0 ~ ' D'-Gtu 4*~ 9 \\1 10 R~~-OD4-90-2 '337 SA '0' ~J!a 358 r ( RH~-o04JI3.~ '2~) 301 .5A IO'"l:t~S 700 12-CIJS-004-S2-2 _1 I~ C IJ S - 004 - J I 7 -3 I So I 12D 135 ~ ---'t...... SA JD'-"t.1l II 14 ~ :::c. +-4 Z 0

g4D 0147

_29~. 3S8 ~oo SA ID,,,~a YA JQt.tUe,e AL~~~ <F£RAT\\HC (1<51) jPR£SS 1[WP ('F) (PSI) SC SH SA PlPI 298 42., 15. I r;. 22., 54.~ ~ _. I-r-- 1-.-- T I-t-298 42.5 40., 1'215 134[,

lI9.2 (00 '2D

{o.79 ~oo J348 ( * '}4- .1~iI' 4 2 5 (.47 ?oo 134$ 28.S'7 170 '190 3~*42 I-t-f-- aDO 1215 14.9-8 42~ 10.79 I-I-t-I-i- - ~'t{3 10:19 - r-100 II~ 10.7, J--- 3DO 4~~ (.Q~ 'M lUllS (I U~;)/1!T flUiO INSU IOIAl $9,/ 4.(..1 1 (&.9 I '1 .1. ~4.f,,37 77.97 2.<6,0 4.79 121.~9 ,*51 - I "'.3C ' /2';il - 2..DL,S 'Igg t.~~~ 1129 - 39.& JD.'l'j - fu."'~ f--- - 4.9i - 19.9'" ~.51 - /(,.3 S.S I r. "3 17*9;3 ~. >I - Ib*a ,/O( - " ('7 ~nlt Q -< ~ ~9 <2: tr1trj~ ~~> ~~~ ~2:~ ZC")~ ~=~ OOtrl> ...,~~ >>~ ~~O ~~Z O~ Ztrj C) rot IV tv 0..., 2: ~ -..a - C) ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ (") > t"'" 0

2! p g;

-um~ Q)::JOl <CQ.G) ('I) 0 VJUl~ ~c...... oro~ ...... NO> VJ

RBG-47876 Page 35 of 131 CALCULA TION ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ENTERGY RIVER BEND STATION 13ASlti A~AL YTltiAL !lArA ~ rt, ~ ~ ~ I ~I I I I o.i I

I.

~ I = <:) C iJ' LA ~ ~ I I I I I I I V1 I I

!Z 3:

\\i! I I I I I I I I

I i

I a: I I I I I I a: '" t l t 11'1 "" VI 11'1..... I ~~ ~ lJ'\\ VI Fi I ~ L.f'. - j~ ~- 00 ~g -v ~ ~~ i.... 8 ~t:. m VI ~...... u-.. ~S r~ '" u- ~g,-- lJ'. ~t. " u U' M ~j~ At (.)~ ~ W'"

0- -l fJ)O C

!§ Q 2 ~ ~ii!: 00 ~ ~ OQ 0 r(\\ 00 ...!I ~ ~ LI'., ~~;!: ~ -'l l.f'\\ 0 0 ~ C'l V l.l' ~ I'- %1 ",ro x ')<. ~ x "] ~ I I J ~g 1'(\\ <J' a'\\ I'() C)(1'I '-.:t -v-t1' f' ~e L<l 'X. x x

x.

)<. -.J l!jQ 7 2 if' ~ oQ 0" I!! r-CALC. NO. - REV.. AX-71AG, Rev. 4 PAGE 23 OF I ) I I I j I, I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I ) I I I I I I

VALVE DATA NODE NOIfINAL S&W S&W NO. SIZE(IN) VALVE 110. DESCRIPTION NO. TYPE FILE NO. 80 ~Nf Itt'IJ*lZ8*tlt. 10 1£"40 Notl F'0'S1A VO.",...., *..$'*lTS Uo8E &1"7.tI~c 18t 10 1.11. vF",oA Vow-o/ft>*O-17 It'llD*nl*Z/I * ,II£cK 0,.'9.001£ Ituo *U~*ZIl* 3D. 4 '~n- ~~(JIJA V(,.'-J.olo*c-?I<S GATt 4Jtf/* 11071< ~ I~HS'"f VIIZ VDS./SO - (j. - t Gl;>>8£ 112/0.Z'lS.ZI,. 'lDt:) osl - 011 L Zoo I~Hr <i11111:J ,t:) IE 12. vFO'f8A . VOS_150-G-1 'Iv 1£1f ~~Ftl59A 31 It-lis. v /2 9 Vo$.o<;o.. 8-2 lalo. 1%3-111- -s *. DelaT IZS Yz. " It \\.4-- !; 4t".s I v OSC)~o-~-1. 2.ll

z.r~-.~J-.

Il& 'I-l,.. ~.. S. '152-5'0 r~*J(l" IE /2. R"'DlfA 2~1* S"21-201-eUI XCjO (0" CHECK. VALVE VALVE OPERe LENGm (FT.) WEIGHT (LB.) WT. (LB. 2*83 1900 It 0 o* 'l.2S' ISSO 1.. 0 ')~O -

334

,0 .32.7 6 ~a!" 45*0 430 ~ 1:ll ~ ~ ~ S~ ~~n ~trj> =~t"4 ~~n Z~~ ~Ot"4 OO~> ..-3~:j >>0 ~~Z Io-C~ O~ Ztrj ~ 111-3 "'CI ~ n C'l roo ~ ~ ~ - ~ > ~ fl 0 ~ '2:1 ~ 41- ~ IJm;;o Dl:::JOJ CCC1G) Cl> 0 I W Ul~ O)e...... oro~

"'0)

W

NODE NOMINAL S&W NO. SIZE(IN) VALVE NO. DESCRIPTION NO. l$zO/I~ (p VCl~Sb*A*1 Y!JC /~51tH1t:NFOI3 ~, J'l. A . ' ~~/Jk ~ foP n.....,,"'" V T .550/ 4 ~o-A-/M~ lee~~s ~~ !$~O 4 VCW'o90- O-/Nt le/~,* vi=0I9 Uo 4 ~~ -".~ IlY*VJ=O&, tC.J " ,,,.,....~ '" n ,.....,...... "r./\\P.J, '=;;.;1 7~ r........... H....... I;;f-~ gJ ,. ~ jJ '~A.L'.. /L"/'\\D.~ '~ t (P I Q %t VcWl5O-~-2J>1 IE5/~ VFCJS,/. u, 2 C; !Y4 V(N(I50-E, -2M 1/651" VFO.S5 ,AIS" ~.1 J_UloL" _,.~~ , T/I< '.I~".,n ---v I~ '-4 ,I'Jn" ~/~ '/AI&J 1&.r\\.r..-'7/tA I -r,..r:,s VU)(') .V'... "- ~( ~ 3/4-Vow 150:-r:.,* {!~ 1£&*VFOu,1 230.,g/4 YCW'/~~-2J.1 J £ If"* VFO(p'Z 9 17 1/2-VOS~*8-Z IR'HS*V74 967. I/Z V~ ~ 1 RI6.". V7..5 VALVE DATA S&W VALVE VALVE TYPE FILE NO. LENGnt (FT.) WEIGHT (LB.) ~r£ 2e8.el'2-0I7*~ 1*G,G,cP 75(::) ..... 1_. ";z..,, ~.O.,,17....A...., ,/ !2_'"7 <it.Ol5£ ~ ~t/l.*t>l7-~ 1./4,(, 5-?5 OECK U8.~II -on*~ /. /~(P 146 <fArE WB.Z;I-6i'l-007K /,0 I..... _..- I",.,.,,..,.,." 22-1 I IV /'.,.,. Ion" ~/z../'l&,QJVll ~A W.~B-~~ .tZ9~ /0 . 'Z9e. /0 h _- ~ -~ ~~~ //"0 .31'25 /0 1

BI'28 10 1(8. ~/3'a58<<:8r

,25 (p 1'$ el3.c;£J8-aIlI. . Z{p(p ~ 1 OPER. WT. (LB.) SG,o /7" '210

JSO I

I i ~I:~I ~ t'!j ~ ~9 ~~n ~trJ> ~e~ t'!j~n ~~C ~O~ OOt'!j> ~'"'d"" >>~ ~"o )IIIII(~~ O~ 2t'!j "'0 > C'l tw1 ~ 0 ~ 2 ~ ~ I -.I - P,.,.. ~ ~ (') > r- ~ 2 9 I ~ ~ -um;:o Dl:J(lJ (DOG) <tl 0' I wcn~ -.jC-.j oCil~

NO'l W.....

RBG-47876 WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION CALCULATION SHEET page38of131~.~~~ 1 0:. ________________________________________ ~~ ________ ~ CALCULATION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER I 2 l 4, II T I 10 I I 12 13 14 16 IT II ~ It 20 21 U 23 Z4 1 2' 25 Z7 211 29 30 I 1I 32 53 34 3' 56 37 311

59 40 41 42 43 44 4'

411 J.O. OR W.O. NO. '~lIO DIVISION f; GROUP CALCULATION NO. IOPTIONAL TASK CODE £H/,.,.r(T) IUlo-Ax-7.A" 1 N/A REF. cAL(tJ/Arlt)A./ of mE".e~v/~;IIIFAlT tftT,?)oJ/ h,.-A/v/!,/oKG(IEI2f1I'1'/7YXJ51A) VAL VI' 5Ir~:: 10* -;,L. f 100 ~ f'1oT""ft oPR. C.c;.. vAlVE wT..- 2950 ~ 120. 8t 23 . _ _ Hp70~ "PeR. wr..lloo'l III ~:1l.2~.... _ 1.9DO.ll> .-i- . @l vALv'- c*c;., i-l~ Yv~L-tr-- :> c: r 6J)@ @ J vAl",£, C. 6-. v :: (23~O<l-II"">>(tr.li-/IOQ)I.!'1 v 215"0

. 8.71

-. - -~~.~-.:. -~~~-~=.,~ --~~- ~.... -.... - N x . _. ~ _. __ GLoBAL. ... _ 5'1-8.75:- A 2.15' /toHEAI; otr _N.,IE~TiA 1Q,f roJ<E . A~es _. _ __ {f",tFgJv~,J'YJ:7~lIc) .E ...L (21Tl'f/j;!Z.)"._._ 1 "'~I .. __._. __._....!. (Z1TX72J<42-2S///(JoX4t.rs- -) ~. -..... 1 I ~a.1. 'Jt lotl)(I~I~ . II & 525. 0 hi ~.*i>f -~ ' i; - ; :; (0. ~., ~.~ ). - ~... -- ~~ ' ~.~'.. ~.=~~---.-- -~~.:.~'~--~~ --==- .. :~. : 52a, 0-=--' 1T (i(J.71.~ 0/) ~ ~. :~~=__ _ -.. __ ~ =- ~/; J>~ _ D,:~ 7./8 /6/ ____. ____ _____________. __ _ /a- ~... -.--

10. 7~ -7*

.. :./,,'7115../A/. _____. _.. 2 -14 J/QT~,. f"~P/'l ~E~tt 11 ) ()/>£,f. IJ r (1"'(ltlI:NA,/~. JItA"7:~£.y()J(~):; /100 It vAI".£ JJ"'~.. 2'241"

~.wl3~' """."'!~"r-..j., I_~~" _ ' ~. STOfIE. a.WU$.~" 'KtHEL"PC08PGAATfON CALCULATION SHEET .. -~ Page 39 of 131 r*~~~10'~~ ____________________ ~~~~~ __________ ~ __________ r-______ __ CALCULAT ION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 2 3 4 !I 6 T 8 CD 9 10 II 12 13 14 15 16 IT 18 19 20 2 I 22 23 ao4 25 26 2T 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 4 1 42 43 44 45 46 J.O. OR W.O. NO. 12210 VALVE DIVISION & GROUP E.M.jPlpe stress C, G. Mev F 013 (NODE.)(1S) CALCULA nON NO. OPTIONAL TASK CODE PAGE_ 8X-71 AGf R.,",.4 (Ref. ) /I I YAlYf... ONlY:- ,(:10*14

= *845 OPE RA TOR ONLY :

1/ / X = 2*9

,242.

It ,f y := (5,2 + 30* 437) - 10*14- /I I 25'4-'37

2*125 r

I' / 3*7 -308 MOV F023 (NOnE. 345) VALVE. Y=~~~. I

'..5 1~

ONLY OPE.RAtOR ONL'( II X r/ I ~ = -3,4 = -. Z~3 -r-0 ~~ ____ MOToR II r ('.0+ \\8.5~'2.) -, ~~' \\.9 '( := I lCc" I L ,\\..'./.J X = IS*375 '1 = 1*531 eli ~ Flow t I, I '2 = - Il '158, C

f " - RBG-47876 Page 40 0

=s

_--'4-. ENTERGY ITEM 1 2 3 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 CALCULA TION CALC. NO. - REV. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AX.7IAG, Rev.-" RIVER BEND STATION PAGE 21S0F CONCENTRA TED WEIGHTS COMPONENT DESCRIPTION WEIGHT (lBS) NODE POINT VALVE BODY, 1E51 "MOVF013 690 X20 - VALve OPERATOR, lE51-MOVFOI3 420 X22 VALVE,IE51'VF034 10 610 VALVE,lE12'VFOI9 145 320 VALVE, lE12 "VF061 10 815 VALVE l E12"VF062 10 835 VALVE BODY, lE12'MOVF023 280 350 VALVE OPERATOR, 1 E 12 'MOVF023 255 352 SUPPORT COMPONENT WT. 10 382 SUPPORT COMPONENT WT. 66 410 FLANGE WEIGHT 30 415 FLANGE WEIGHT 30 417 VALVE,IE12'VF086 350 520 1 EI2*FEV014A(A*) 450 128 Valv& Operator 1 El2 'MOVF053A 1100 82 Va(v& Weight 1 E12 "MOVF053A 1900 80 lE12"VF050A 1850 182 Check Valva 430 X98 lE12"VF063A 350 304

RBG-47876 Page 41 0 fB1 - ENTERGY lorPOlT it. lI'O. 215 CALCULATION CALC. NO ** REV. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AX-71AG, Rev." RIVER BEND STATION PAGE2~OF RELA TIVE THERMAL ANCHOR DISPLACEMENTS ItJPP01T SUPPOlt p.-HER ATIACBK!trr TYPE LOCATION MODE nEVATION (ftJ_ ~X(in) .6T (in .6Z (in) If ACisuH£~ A tJ X. . ogt ,*8 lZl-,~ I* & '31

10 ()

ANC.HO~ 6 LOc,..

2.

-.1'0 '009 - -007

RBG-47876 Page 42 0 f". CALCULATION ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CALC. NO. - REV. AX-7lAG. Rev.'- ---~ ENTERGY RIVER BEND STATION PAGE300F AELA TIVE SEISMIC ANCHOR DISPLACEMENTS IUPPOIT SUPPOlT n; SUProlT ATTACHMENT .61 (in) 110. TYP! LOCATION ELEVATION (ft) .6t (in ~ %(in) A I'JC: HOR. A lJ~ I 5' '6 LOG-. loG - 9 -27 .124 -240 -53 ~ R)(,~z S 9'. S"

t~

.23 116 '* vc., R c I OJ.' - Jl~, - -114

2,"35 14'
Vc."i.')(

\\0' -7

l65

.c~C,J - I Of I~G ~ Rx, Roz 10 g-~ ~ 1:70 -- - 2.1+ 0 ~x" Rc 16CJ.. 123-0~

31.S -
~75 17'
vc..

I 12<4 - 7¥g -

11.~S' 215 ~

.. ~ AssuMEO ~., '240 A NC.HoA. IZI.. t;

t.o90

. 295 12L1 Jj Re

'l '3, 104 -G If l30 oil ANC~O~

~~'.. "l1t

2.\\
11.35

. 20!" A~CHoR 310 ,r 106- ~

27

. 'IZ4

21.1-0 REF: f>K-3.34
- Reference for the seismic anchor movements: Absolute/displacements of the Auxiliary Building.

All restraints have Auxiliary Building displacement except the fictitious anchor for the feedwater line (node 21 5) which has Reactor Building and orbital motion relative to Auxiliary Building restraints.

RBG-47876 Page 43 of 131 STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION CALCULA TION SHEET CALCULATION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER JO. OR WOo NO. DIVISION & GROUP CALCULATION NO. OPTIONAL TASK CODE 12210 NP(C) A'I.-7l~ Rs..J,4 REF. DESIGN INPUT (CONT'D) RELATIVE SEISMIC ANCHOR AND/OR SUPPORT DISPLACEMENTS ~

6i:ii ~JI:.GijLMlI9~t ~m ;Ht; P9LL9ltH!i6 PMiIH&~

~.,,~ I SUPPORT DISPLACEMENTS

NODE SUPT.

BUILDING A'I"l'ACHMENT (IN) NO. TYPE ( STRUCTURE) ELEVATION (FT) OX OY DZ >(1 ~ A tI X. /3L..D6t, q/,719 0.2550 0.1800 0.2370 )(9 ~~ Q7-'25 0.2750 ------ )(47 IRskEW /04.75 0.1810 0.2680 )(48 ~KeW 104,75 0.3070 ------ 0.2680 )( 52 ~i! 104,75 0.2680 ><. 61 R.e IO~.O 0.2720 X71 r-;skew IIB.lto7 0.3620 ------ 0.3030 X. 76 Vc. /1~75 0.1810 ------ p- /~. 7.c:. 100 ~ r-..- /~~,6Z(P 0.3800 0.1810 --~ ~ --.......... ~~(, -~ 121 0.3130 '/c::. /1Z~t6'Z-z-. ~ ~ 122 0.1810 ------ ~,~ 'J~ ---~10 141 0.3130 ~,~ I~o_.~ --~o 220 /"2'2,w 0.4110 ~ ~ ~&:Nr. jll;Z, 1~ 0.9870 0.4390 0.8690

/

PAGE - . ) REMARKS ~ ~

RBG-47876 Page 44 of 131 i JO. OR WOo NO. 12210 REF. STONE 8& WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION CALCULATION SHEET CALCULATION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER DIVISION 8& GROUP CALCULATION NO. OPTIONAL TASK CODE NP(C} Ay..-7l~ ~.4 DESIGN INPUT (CONT'D) RELATIVE SEISMIC ANCHOR AND/OR SUPPORT DISPLACEMENTS (

SEE CitbCtfbMi9N Oll 'fllfl POb hOWH'S E\\\\6B (5)

~ "I i SUPPORT DISPLACEMENTS

NODE SUPT.

BUILDING ATTACHMENT (IN) NO. TYPE (STRUCTURE) ELEVATION (FT) DX DY DZ jf, ,I,J1 T'JI2VIAlJ: II /~~,/7 .~ o<ouv 338 ~>\\f. At/X, &..o<!,. '18.76 0.2800 0.1800 ------ 375 Rc IQ?385 0.2570 380 Rx /oB,v;7 0.3020 ------ 382 $1-/ 104,7e 0.1810 ------ 410 Vc /tXtJ.75 0.1810 A. lo~,75 us 0.3150 0.1810 0.2740 537 Vc;& 98.31 0.1800 0.2520 575 ~. rM 103,QICJ, 0.3000 0.1800 0.2640 r ~2 PAGE_ ) REMARKS

RBG-47876 Page 45 of 131 e ENTERGY CALCULATION ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT RIVER BEND STATION Basic Analytical Data Thermal Modes: CALC. NO. - REV. AX-7lAG, Rev." PAGE~~OF ICS and RHS is injecting - or not injecting - while FWS is hot or old, i.e, while feedwater connection node 215 has either the static displacement, for feedwater hot or cold. Injection at 122 deg F bounds "no injection" at 120 deg F. Modes 1-9 represent the different flow conditions. Modes 6-9 were not analyzed. They can be considered bounded by modes 1-5. Region Mode (Tempereture of) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Pipino Une No. 1 122 40 40 298 185 122 40 122 122 RHS-014-74-2 2 122 40 40 298 40 122 40 122 122 RHS-*Olo.66*2 3 122 40 40 298 40 122 40 122 122 RHS-Olo.65*2 4 426 40 425 298 425 122 40 170 170 RHS-Olo.65*2 (AFTER CK) 5 425 40 425 298 425 122 40 170 170 ICS-OOa*1 01 *2 (AFTER CK) 6 122 40 40 122 40 122 40 170 170 ICS-006-1 01 17-2. RH5-004-9o.2 7 122 40 40 122 40 122 40 170 170 IC5-006-8*2 8 122 40 40 122 40 122 122 122 122 RH5-004-113-2. CN5-004-52*2 9 122 40 40 100 40 122 laO 100 122 CN5-004-415-3 10 122 40 40 298 185 122 40 122 122 RH5-014-75*2 11 122 40 40 29B 40 122 40 122 122 CNS-004-58*2 12 122 40 40 100 185 122 40 122 122 C N5-004-5 7-3 425 40 425 425 425 425 425 425 70 Feedwator Uno Temp

RBG-47876 Page 46 of 131 -

===~ ENTERGY CALCULATION ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT RIVER BEND STATION DYNAMIC LOADS FLUID TRANSIENT FILE NAMES: FROM TO FILENAME 678

1178

/home3Iywu90/px1037Ifrcic.29 1180 1680 /home3Iywu90/px1037Ifrcic.30 1682 2182 /home3/ywu90/px1037Ifrcic.31 2184 2684 /home3Iywu90/px1037Ifrcic.32 2686 3186 /home3Iywu90/px1037/frcic.33 3188 3688 /home3/ywu90/px1037/frcic.34 3690 4190 /home3Iywu90/px1037Ifrcic.35 4192 4692 /home3/ywu90/px1 037/frcic.36 4694 5194 /home3lywu90/px1 037/frcic.37 5196 5696 /home3lywu90/px1037Ifrcic.38 5698 6198 /home3lywu90/px1037Ifrcic.39 6200 6700 /home3/ywu90/px1037Ifrcic.40 6702 7202 /home3/ywu90/px1037Ifrcic.41 7204 7704 /home3/ywu90/px1037Ifrcic.42 7706 8206 /home3/ywu90/px1037/frcic.43 8222 8721 /home3/riverbend/ftlpx1 015/p1 015104.017 8723 9222 /home3/riverbend/ftlpx1 015/p1 015104.018 9224 9723 /home3/riverbend/ftlpx1 015/p1 015104.019 9725 10224 lhome3/riverbend/ftlpx1 015/p1 015104.020 10226 10725 /home3/riverbend/ftlpx1 01Sfp1 015104.021 10727 11226 lhome3/riverbend/ftlpx1 015/p1 015104.022 11228 11727 lhome3Jriverbend/ftlpx1 015/p1 015104.023 CALC. NO. - REV. AX-71AG. Rev." PAGE~40F

RBG-47876 Page 47 0 f 131 - CALCULATION CALC. NO. - REV.

8 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AX-71AG. Rev.",

-ENTERGY RIVER BEND STATION PAGE.37 0F DYNAMIC LOADS FILE NAMES Unifonn ARS method is used. All supports except the fictitious anchor at node 215 are in the Auxiliary Building; therefore, the seismic ARS for the elevation range from highest to the lowest Auxiliary Building attachments are input. Node 215 transmits the Reactor Building ARS of Drywell and Shield Building to the piping model. The feedwater penetration Z-3A is attached to these structures at EL. 121.85'. For the seismic ARS, a structural point above and below have to be input; for the hydrodynamic ARS, the structural model has a node at the penetratlon elevatlon. TABLE 1 Structural Attachment Elevation (FT) Curve Number aBE SSE Auxiliary Building 70 auxbon01.ace auxbsn02.ace Auxiliary Buildina 95 auxbon03.ace auxbsn04. ace Auxiliary Building 114 auxbon05.ace auxbsn06.ace Auxiliary Building 141 auxbon07.ace auxbsn08.ace Drywell 114 rbdwon41.ace rbdwsn42.ace Drywall 133 rbdwon43.ace rbdwsn44.ace Shield Building 112.67 rbsbon03.ace rbsbsn04.ace Shield Building 133 rbsbon05.ace rbsbsn06.ace TABLE 2 Structural Elevation Curve Number Attachment (ft) SAV1V SAV16V CHCO PS Drywell 121 rbdwan43.ace rbdwcn43.ace rbdwpn43.ace Shield Build ina 121 rbsbtn03.ace rbsban03.ace rbsbcn03.ace rbsbpn03.ace ~ 80Ul-JbE-.b ey S'RY\\I CAsl!5'

RBG-47876 Page 48 of 131 CALC. NO. - REV. AX-71AG, Rev. 4 CALCULATION ENGINEERING DEPARTl\\'IENT RIVER BEND STATION ENTERGY MAXIMUM STRESS LEVELS OESIGN CONDITION SUSTAINED LOADS EQN. 8 OCCASIONAL LOADS EQN. 9 OCCASIONAL LOADS EQN. 9 OCCASIONAL LOADS EON. 9 THER.'IIIL EXPANSION EQN. 10 LEVEL s C D ASHE SECT. III, CLASSES 2, 3 LOCATION MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE COMPUTED or MAXIMUM COMPUTED STRESS ENO ELEMENT STRESS I PSI} ( PSI} ALLOWABLE X25 X35 303 303 505 X27 X25 X35 290 302 303 302 303 21$ M 505 7166 15674 20692 21011 22098 SH .478 15000 1.2 SH .971 18000 1.8 SH .766 27000

2. 4 SH

.584 36000 SA .982 22500 PAGE3~OF Based on industry practice the regions which are isolated from the Reactor Building by at least 3 equivalent dynamic restraints in each direction can be considered unaffected by the Reactor Building response spectra. These regions experience only OBE and SSE ARS, and not hydrodynamic ARS. The boundaries of the RB affected region are beyond nodes (or exclude boundary nodes) 116, X" and X338. Therefore, the stresses in these regions can be corrected to exclude the hydrodynamic loading. The maximum stresses for level C and 0 were not corrected, since they are within the aJlowables.

RBG-47876 Page 49 ENTERGY CALCULATION ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT RIVER BEND STATION FUNCTIONAL CAPABIUlY EVALUA nON: CALC. NO. - REV. AX-71AG, Rev... PAGE 370F The maximum stress level for Equation 9 emergency condition and Equation 9 faulted condition are below the Equation 9 Normal/Upset allowable, and OD/t is less than 50 for piping associated with this calculation. Therefore, the piping system ensures the functional capability. No further detail evaluation is required.

RBG-47876 Page50ur~~=-----Ir-------------------------------------r----~~~~--______ ~ CALC. NO. - REV. ENTERGV CALCULATION ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT RIVER BEND STATION PIPE BREAK LOCATIONS AX-71AG, Rev." PAGE~SOF The only applicable region is from the feedwater connection at node 215 upstream to the first check valve in the RHR line, the RCIC line and the RWCU line (not modelled) i. e., nodes 185-215 and X93-X98.

== Conclusion:== Besides the mandatory new break at node X93 (the interface of High Energy and Moderate Energy piping - see calculation no: 228.850-CBC-2024 REV.O), no new High Energy breaks need be postulated. The stresses in the High Energy region are well below the allowbles.

I ~m~ I IR~~ 01(/)~ ..... C-.j \\~Ia.r~~ VALVE IDENTIFICAnON NUMBER: 1E12i1MOVF053A Loading IAcceleration in Global Coordinate System Acceleration in Global Coordinate System Case at C.G. of operator (g) at C.G of Valve Body (g) Acceptable Acceleration (g) NP82 NP81 Ax A'I Az Ax Ay Az Ax Ay Az oaEI 0.162 0.131 0.238 0.094 0.13 0.237 2 2 2 SSEI 0.323 0.259 0.475 0.187 0.259 0.486J 2 2 2 SRV1V 1.137 0.783 1.277 0.617 0.781 0.347 3.5 3.5 3.5 SRV16V 1.563 1.112 1.759 0.858 1.11 0.545 4 4 4 CHUGICO 0.411 0.153 0.224 0.196 0.151 0.307 PS 0.115 0.086 0.103 0.058 0.086 0.034 4 4 4 FT 0.093 0.083 0.151 0.094 0.083 0.087 4 4 4 UPSET 1.57412261 1.12276177 1.78143931 0.86823729 1.12066453 0.6006355 6 6 6 FAULTED 1.65071742 1.15495584 1.84192372 0.90508176 1.15276667 0.79689334 7.21110255 7.21110255 7.21110255 Valve Spec No: 228.212-047-083E LEGEND: UPSET = SRSS(08EI.FT.SRVMAX) FAULTED = SRSS(SSEI, FT. SRVMAX.,MAX(CHCO. PS>> ~ l"Jj 2! as 9

j~tj: =l"Jj>

=~~ t'ljZtj 2 ~ . ~ OOt""4 r;,)t'!j> ~~~ >>~ ~""'O ~~2 O~ Ztfj ~ "0 ~ (") ~ ~ [!12 - VJ P 2! \\D 0 ~ '11 ~ ~ L--__ -----------------A--------'I 1

VALVE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: 1E12*VF019 Loading Acceleration in Global Coordinate System Acceleration in Global Coordinate System Case at C.G. of operator (g) at C.G of Valve Body (9) NP NP320 Ax Ay Az Ax Ay Az OBEI 0.159 0.161 0.119 SSEI 0.315 0.32 0.236 SRV1V 1.306 1.636 0.958 SRV16V 1.717 1.921 1.127 CHUG/CO 1.086 1.37 0.884 PS 0.148 0.188 0.114 FT 1.317 1.849 0.6 UPSET 0 0 o 2.20669413 2.67113515 1.28229872 FAULTED 0 0 o 2.47443711 3.01468771 1.5707581 Valve Spec No: 228.211 Acceptable Acceleration (g) Ax Ay Az 2 2 2 2 2 2 3.5 3.5 3.5 4 4 4 4 4 4 6 6 6 7.21110255 7.21110255 7.21110255 -um;:o Ql::lOJ (coG) (1) 0' I Olcn~ NC-.J oro~ ., NO) ~ I:~I

u

.~ ~ ~ S ~. ~ I ~~n

=~~

=~n t!!l~~ 2C:>~

==> Cl)tJ!j~ ~~~ >~O

3~2 O~

2t!j ~ ~ 'U ~ n ~ R ~ (lIS - ~ >

2:

0 f1 P OW!

a

~ ~

VALVE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: 1E12*VF063A Loading I Acceleration in Global Coordinate System Acceleration in Global Coordinate System Case at C.G. of operator (9) at C.G of Valve Body (9) Acceptable Acceleration (g) NP 304 NP 315 Ax Ay Az Ax Ay Az Ax Ay Az OeEI 0.4 0.112 0.342 0.4 0.117 0.402 2 2 2 SSEI 0.792 0.224 0.68 0.793 0.233 0.797 2 2 2 SRV1V 2.337 0.773 2.125 2.338 0.85 2.357 3.5 3.5 3.S SRV16V 3.739 1.046 3.088 3.741 1.116 3.546 4 4 4 CHUG/CO 0.159 0.326 1.132 0.16 0.421 0.376 PS 0.196 0.086 0.169 0.196 0.093 0.196 4 4 4 FT 0.257 0.092 0.264 0.257 0.088 0.324 4 4 4 UPSET 1 3.769107321 1.055994321 3.118076971 3.771091351 1.125561641 3.58339169 6 6 6 FAULTED 1 3.835602951 1.122648651 3.366866671 3.837759111 1.218494971 3.668198061 7.211102551 7.211102551 7.21110255 Valve Spec No: 228.211-049-007K -om::u Q)::l([l ~Q.G') o I c.noo.p. We....... oro CP ~ I:~I ~ l'!'J Z ~9 ~~(]

=~>

t=~~ ~Z("') 2c;')~ O~r-c OO~> ~~..-3 ..,~O ~~Z O~ ZtIj ~ ~ n ~ ~ t'II

z:

.p.. p p 0 " I ~ ~ ~

VALVE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: 1E12*VF050A Loading Acceleration in Global Coordinate System Acceleration in Global Coordinate System Case at C.G. of operator (g) at C.G of Valve Body (9) NP NP 182 Ax Ay A:z. Ax Ay Az OSEI 0.119 0.102 0.121 SSEI 0.236 0.204 0.239 SRV1V 0.735 0.797 0.574 SRV16V 0.965 1.072 0.885 CHUG/CO 0.212 0.489 0.168 PS 0.081 0.097 0.065 FT 0.963 1.462 1.19 UPSET 0 0 0 1.36848639 1.81577311 1.4879<4019 FAULTED 0 0 0 1.3997264 1.88874694 1.51151249 Valve Spec No: 228.211-049-001E Acceptable Acceleration (9) Ax Ay A:z. 2 2 2 2 2 2 3.5 3.5 3.5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 6 6 6 7.21110255 7.21110255 7.21110255 ~I:~.

D C) <

~ 2 e~ ~~n ~~E: =e n l"lZ? Z~ t:1~> {J'lf:'1~ ~~..... >~O ~.,Z O~ ZtrJ Z ,..;j -um::u Dl:lOJ (coG) <D 0" I (]len.,. .,.C-.,J om~ N (j) ~ n ~ Cl ~ ~... .t.. ~ z p 0 "2 f ~ =, I I

VALVE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: 1E51*MOVF013 loading Acceleration in Global Coordinate System Acceleration in Global Coordinate System Acceptable Acceleration (g) Case at C.G. of operator (g) at C.G of Valve Body (g) NPX22 NPX20 Ax Ay Az. Ax Ay Az. Ax Ay AI OBEt 0.254 0.145 0.208 0.133 0.153 0.159 2 2 . 2 SSEI 0.503 0.287 0.413 0.264-0.302 0.314 2 2 2 SRV1V 1.633 0.995 1.24 0.874 1.082 0.797 3.5 3.5 3.5 SRV16V 2.262 1.28 1.73 1.149 1.361 1.041 4 4 4 CHUG/CO 0.351 0.37 0.691 0.765 0.406 0.307 PS 0.168 0.105 0.149 0.096 0.114 0.08 4 4 4 FT 1.055 1.257 1.456 0.705 1.259 0.908 4 4 4 UPSET 2.50882144 1.79985388 2.27070474 1.35459034 1.86032551 1.3904769 6 6 6 FAULTED 2.57019046 1.85410841 2.40018458 1.57230627 1.92183298 1.44947922 7.21110255 7.21110255 7.21110255 Valve Spec No: 228.212 y -~ ~~ N....r--\\) ~V

£.

-y ~ -om:;u Dl:JOJ <coG') CD 0 I OlCll.+>- OlC-.J oCil~ ~I:~.~

D NO) a

~ 2 ~S3 ~~(") ~~~ =zn ~~~ ~t:lr-c (l)trl> ~~.-j >>)0004 .-j~O ..... ~Z ~~ Z ~ "0 ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ - ~ > ~ \\..v 53 0 ~. = ~

VALVE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: 1E51-MOVF023 Loading Acceleration in Global Coordinate System Acceleration in Global Coordinate System Case at C.G. of operator (g) at C.G of Valve Body (g) NP352 NP350 Ax Ay Az Ax Ay Az OBEI 0.367 0.179 0.306 0.128 0.154 0.126 SSEI 0.726 0.356 0.607 0.254 0.306 0.249 SRV1V

1.695 1.506 2.139 0.945 1.026 0.962 SRV16V 3.052 2.115 3.167 1.312 1.529 1.16 CHUGICO 0.505 1.115 1.091 0.889 0.55 0.842 PS 0.16 0.167 0.254 0.102 0.126 0.112 FT 0.772 1.254 1.01 0.985 0.784 0.617 UPSET 3.16944427 2.4653158 3.33820685 1.64556591 1.71617394 1.31991098 FAULTED 3.26998303 2.72317866 3.55087581 1.86319038 1.82144805 1.58027023 H

Acceptable Acceleration (9) Ax Ay Az 2 2 2 2 2 2 3.5 3.5 3.5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 6 6 6 7.21110255 7.21110255 7.21110255 -l; )( I':~. -C rt1 2: ~9 ~

jtIjn

d~~

=e n tl'j~~ Z~~ =0> C/}~.-j ~~.... 'Um:;lJ Dl:JeD tOnG') CD 0' I 01(J)~ CJ)C--.J oro~

NCJ) w

>~O

J ~ 2!,

O~ ZtrJ 2 ~ ~ n ~ c:') PI -

k

~ :z p, 0 ~ 'It ~

VALVE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: 1E12*VF086 Loading IAcceleration in Global Coordinate System Acceleration in Global Coordinate System Case at C.G. of operator (g) at C.G of Valve Body (g) Acceptable Acceleration (g) NP NP 520 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Ax Ay ~ OBEI 0.228 0.148 0.131 2 2 2 SSEI 0.451 0.294 0.261 2 2 2 SRV1V 0.963 0.927 1.07 3.5 3.5 3.5 SRV16V 1.308 1.436 1.581 4 4 4 CHUG/CO 0.528 0.72 0.797 PS 0.086 0.115 0.155 4 4 4 FT 0.489 0.572 0.918 4 4 4 UPSET o o 01 1.414909541 1.552798761 1.832879161 61 61 6 FAULTED o o 01 1.55954161 1.730351411 2.011371421 7.211102551 7.211102551 7.21110255 Valve Spec No: 228.211 'c N

y.

2 1-y -um:;o Ql:J[l} ~ Q. (j) (]1 ~, -...JC~ ...,-...J I Q,<D~ i':~I,~~m t!!fJ ~ ~C'l ~~n ~;~ ~~n 2!C'ld ~~~ CJ)~~ ~~~ ~>o ..... ~~ ~~ ~ "'II ~ n B C') (lIS ~ - ~ ~ -..n ~ 0..,, =

"'~BG:47876 Page 58 of ENTERGY LIllI ]f0. CALCULATION ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT RIVER BEND STATION FLANGE QUAUFICA nON 1-21-15 -OI4-7Z-2

SUBJECT:

QUALIFICATION OF J'LAliGID JOINTS (TABLE A) .ned On: IH'I'R-605-0 . (R£r# ? ) CALC. NO ** REV. AX-71AG, Rev. 4 PAGE4-('OF Node Point No. l'lS ASHE III CIa ** 2 and 3 FlANGE TYPE: J? r. wElC>INGo N£,I< FUNCI MATERIAL: SA-\\oS SIZE: 14 BOtTING KATERIAL: sA - 193 Gt.!S7 NO. OF BOLTS: 2..0 S 25000 psi ~20,OOO psi S, '3' '2.00 psi C 20.15" io. '\\

.7(3X2Q;IS.Uin. 2 Df

". ?S in. F s

Syl 36000 a _*~8~b

__ 7,--____ S 1. 0

_..:..\\7.:.;. *..:5~6~.;.&,"t.lII.Iot __ _

S: Mioimum allowable value of Itr *** for boltinl material It lOOO! from hble 1-7.3, lubsection NA, ASHE III (psi) Sy: Yield Itrenlth of flanae material.t the delilo t.mperltur~ from tlble 1-2.2, 1-7.1 lublection NA, ASHE III (pli) C: Diameter of bolt circl ** (in.) 2 ~: Tot.l croll-Iectional Ir ** of tb. boltl at the root of the tbreads. (iry Df : Outlide dia ** ter of r.i,ed face of fllDle. (io.) o ACCEPTABLE 0 UNACCEPTABLE rt"r"----"'T""'------=--:-:-==-=:---------I--~;-;;--:;;::-:==;--....., Page 59 of 1 CALCULATION CALC. NO. - REV. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT RIVER BEND STATION ENTERGY FLANGE QUAUFICA nON LM NO. R 1-1 S - 014 - 7 S - 2 hJp : S1lJJECT: QUALIFICATION or FlANGED JOINTS (TABU B) laaed 00: EHTR-60S-0 ( RiF.:jf 7) Desiln, Normal and Upset Conditions .-1 Deadweisht and Thermal ~ LOADS Hx (ft-lb) DEADWEIGHT Co 57 THERMAL H-I 15 ~ STEADY STATE

TOTAL (A) *

-+ 4'1,

1.

Bcndinl moment. /(M )2 + (H )2 Y Z

2.

Torsional.oment = H x

3.

Allowable moment z 3125. F. ~ ---rr-

c

-1) tty (ft-lb) -lO99 , I c:; ~ (099

AX-71AG. Rev. 4 PAGE 470F 128 Hz (ft-lb) 3~O3 2.~g9

? S 92 ft lb ft lb ft lb "fa: The aaxi.WI of 1 or 2 * '7 ~ 3 3. ~+. I.

Total CA) i. the.. xiaua of the (deadwei,ht + It.ady Itate) or (deadwei,ht + th.~l + Iteady.tate) allebraic combination *

..... KaximWi COVY'foVle...,fs. -f'ro/"'Y') <i:1 fI 7h~n-y,ltl C6l-"S I;'r()~.

RBG-47876.---=:::----r-----------------r---:;::;:-;;:-:::-::-::---=~:----, Page60of1~~ CALCULATION CALC. NO.-REV.

e;!i ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AX-1IAG, lUv.4 ENTERGY RIVER BEND STATION FLANGE QUALIFICA TlON LINE NO.

R-1---4 So - 014 :.2. NP ~ S'UBJECT: QUALIFICATION or FlANGED JOINTS (TABLE C) lued On: EMTR-60S-0 ( ~ f r ~ 5") .-2 De.dweilht, Thermal and Dynlmic LOld. ~I-l Moments LOADS ~ TOTAL (A) N+U Dynlmi c *It OBEA TOTAL (B) *

4.

Bendin& Moment Mx (ft-lb) My (ft-lb) ~ 495 (,99 ~ ~7 ~IJ 2~1 44'7. 17 ~ 5. 12 & ? 892 1100 2~7

7439 ft-lb S.

Torsional.o.ent

H I 093 ft-lb x

6.

Allowable.o.ent

6250 r,t

~ 1"2 I kfd S 6250 (Sy) C t\\' 12 36000 Hid: the ani.WI of 4 or S. 74 39 (.'1-La Ab.olute ~o.bin.tion of At N+U dyoaaic and OlEA n.xi.ua value of all dynlmic lo.d combination. for norm.l.nd up.et condition (i.*. t OlE. SRV. fluid Tran.ient. etc) /-JoTE:.s"y) I=T !:>OS t..JOT A~P!..'1' I SINe..;; f$OL.AT&D F-J2.C>/Yf 'R..e.

~B(j-4787o """'"'---==---'"I"----------------'""'T'--=-:-:------...., Page 61 of 1 CALCULA TION CALC. NO. - REV. ENTERGY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT RIVER BEND STATION FLANGE QUALIFICA TlON LINE NO. R~'5.- 014-/5-2 NP:

SUBJECT:

QUALIFICATION OF FlANGED JOINTS (TABU D) lased On: IMTR-605-0 (~f' ~ 2 )

b.

Ellulency Condition b-1 Deadweilht. Tbermal and Dynamic Load. ~ LOADS Mx (ft-lb) My (ft"lb) TOTAL (A) 495 &, 99 EMERGENCY DYNAHIC ** "331 (, ( I TOTAL (C)

g?>2 I ~ 10

7.

Bendin, moment./(M )2 + (M )2 V y z AX-71AG, Rev. 4 PAGE 490F M (ft-lb) z 5 i 92 r I OO~ I (.,992

8.

J< I ~ 10)2 + <<(,~~~2 Tor.ionll Moment
Mx IS 7 I J,4 ft-lb

= g 32 ft"'lb

9.

Operatin. prellure

Po * 'SQOfS; ~ l.SP. 1.5'XSoO = 7rQ p5.i

10.

Allowable aoment * (11250 ~ - 1:2 D2f P) F /12 16 e IC

(11'150)(1'.2' _~"I,.25aJCotoO)1(\\1:lJ: 11328'1 1'2.

I=-T. L e Po: Kaxi.tIII operatinl prellure durin. e.erlenC)' condition (psi). 500 f!>; P: Deli,n pre.. ure (psi)

S"oo r S,

'I: laer,ency condition pre.. ure concurrent with Mfd (pli) * ~()c) pSt !tfcS: The.axi.... of 7 or a

7 I \\ 4 fL,..
Ablolute co.biDation of A and emerlen~ dyn.. 1c
- Maxi.... value of all dyna.ic IOld combinations for.mer,en~ conditioD

- '*~rm*.:tt7S;O-Page 62 of 1 ENTERGY CALCULATION ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT RIVER BEND STATION FLANGE QUALIFICA T10N tINE )l0. R H ~ - 014 - 7 ; - 2 ~ P ~

SUBJECT:

QUAlIFICATION OT rtANGED JOINTS (TABLE E) aued On: EMTR-605-0 ( ~e. F' t 2 )

c.

Faulted ConditioD c-1 Deadweilht. Thlr.al and Dynamic Loads ~" LOADS "x (ft-lb "y (ft-lb) TOTAl (A) 4 ~S; Co~9 FAULTED DYNAMIC '*'* &;~~ I I 9 I. TOTAL (D) '* /157 J8<to

11.

BlndiD,.oment * /(",)2 + (Mz)2 CALC. NO. - REV. AX-7lAG, Rev. 4 PAGE,~OP Hz (ft-lb) S"g 9-.1 2102-79~4

/(/890)2

+ (79)4)2 go 2 14 ft-Ib

12. Torsional Ha.ent * "x I I 7 7 f~-lb

13. Operatinl preslure

Po. ~o~ psi

~2:0 p ~ '2 ~ $0-0 :.10"'a'0 fS;

14. Allowable.oment. ' (11250 '\\... ti' DI P f) F~cJ12

(II*UO",!. 2'-4f"I,.~St,l(500)'J(!1.:.!.f... 21121'1.

t~ ~r"LJ I "fd{(11250 ~... ~) DI Pf > -& (~(kJ ' Po: Kaxi.u. operatiD, pre ** ure durin, faulted cODdition (pli) * ~ou p~ ; P: Delip pres.ure (pai) * '$"00 psi 'f: Faulted condition pressure concurrent with Kfd (pai) * ~ 00 r' ~ Mfd : The axia.. of 11 or 12

g.2 14 r~. La, Ablolute eo.bination of A and faulted dynl.ic
- Maxi....,lu. of all dynaaic. lOld co.bin.tioDI for faulted condition

RSG-47876 --.. r--~=-----r----___ -------------r---::;-:-:-::-:::-::---------. Page 63 of 3liA, CALCULATION CALC. NO ** Rn'.

a;e!i ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AX-7IAG,.......

RIVER BEND STATION ENTERGY FLANGE QUALIFICA TlON tUll NO. 'UlJECr: QUAlIfICATION Of rtANGtD JOINTS (TASLE A) ...... 011: EMn-60S-0 PAGE] I 011' MA-)l,oP-Nodt Point No. ~/S~/7 AS~ III Class 2 and 3 nANG!: TYPE:. V 1E.t..btl" N£C.J::.. FlANGE MA1'!RIAl: ~A- -10'5 SIZE: 4 # IOlTING KATERIAl: ~-lqS,G,R.~7 NO. 0' JOLTS: S ~

3;;d.'7::>h4-.

5 a 2~~ pli ~20,OOO pli 0 5, e~ooo pli C 7 *8£3 ie. ~ a ~. 4/~ iD.2 Df U>. I 9 in. a S I 36000 *

.0 Y

riC:

r.C I

a /*68 IN. ~ 1.0 5: HiDim~ allow.bl. v.lu. of Itrlll for boltin, a.t.rial.t 100*' fro~ table 1-7.3, lub,.etion KA, ASHE III (psi) Iy: Yi.ld Itr.n,th of 11.n,...t.ri.l at tb. d'lilft tlmp.ratur. fro. t.bl. 1-2.2, J-7.1 lubslctioD ~A. ASME III (pli) C: Dia.. t.r of 'olt circl ** (ie.) ~: Tot.1 ~ro ** -** etioDil.r.a of the bolta at the root of lb. thr ** dl. (in)! nf : OUtlide di *** tlr 01 rail.d f.cl 01 Il.D, *. (iD.) o ACanAiU - UNACanAiLE

F<BG-4787o ** -'" - - ~.......,=----r-----------------r----;.-:-:-::-::::-==~---, Page 64 of 1 CALCULATION CALC. NO. - REV. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AX-7tAG. Rev." RIVER BEND STATION PAGE,20¥ ENTERGV FLANGE QUALIFICA nON R ~ S - 004 - 113 - 2 i-..J P : 4/'7/411 I LIli'E NO.

SUBJECT:

gUALITICATION or ruNG£D JOINTS (TABLE B) .... d CD: EMTR.. 60S.. 0 ( R.f.F4-z)

e.

Desian, Normal and Upset Conditions .-1 De.dwei,ht and Thermal ~ "x (ft-Ib) tty (ft-Ib) M (ft-Ib) LOADS z DEADW'E I CHT - 47 '5 2~ THERHAL ** 9 I 50 I?t; STEADY STATE ** TOTAL (A)

j 3g 55 1~4

1.

Bendin, moment s JeHy )2 + (Hz)2

J( t;?)2 + (184)2. 1'12.'

ft Ib

2.

3.

Torlional moment

M x Allowable.oment
3125. F 0

~ "1'2 Ie -0 Mfa.: The axaWl of 1 or 2. (9.2,* ft. \\ \\a ft Ib ft Ib Totll (A) 11 the.,xiau. of the (deadweiaht + It.a41 Itate) or (deadweiabt + the~l + Iteldy Itate).laebrlic combiDation.

" M.xiau.

comr0l'l~n+S +ron'"> c:il/l Th~rl"Y)~J c."'J:.~~ il"lf'o.d-..

~B(9 -47e16 '-t"Pt~=-__ -.-------__________ --r __ ::-:--::-:-_____ -r Page 65 of CALCULATION CALC. NO. - REV. AX-71AG. Rev." EN11:ROV ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT RIVER BEND STATION PAGE $] or FLANGE QUAllFICA TlON LINE NO. /:2 4-l c:. - ood - I I 3 - 2 415/417 I

SUBJECT:

QUALIFICATION OF FtANGED JOINTS (TABLE C) Jaud On: EMTR-605-0 ( ~f 1="41 Z) .-2 Deadveilht. Thereat and Dynamic Load. ~ LOADS !1x (ft-lb) My (ft"'lb) Hz (ft-lb) TOTAL CA) 13 S

S Ig4 N+U_Dytl,mic **

~U> 210 I C; ;J OBIA 7-2 510 I 7 ::2 TOTAL (B)

2:e:1J~~

3:2t SO '7

4.

Bendin& Moment

J(~y)2 + (Hz )2
J C-~2. I )2 + ('O~)2 S.

Tor.ional.o.ent."x.

&> Q 2 ft-lb

~4~ ft-lb

6.

Allowable moment

6250 FIC

~ 12

~.

\\7. s, X IS.t'.,395"5 ft-lb 1'1 Absolut. c,OIIb1nation of A. N+U dyna.1~ and OBIA }faxtau. value of all dynamic load co.binationl for normal and Up.,t condition (i.*., ORE. SRV. Fluid Transient ** tc)

--rtBG!47876 page66cl1~~~~~~~~~~-C~~-L~C-~-~~-T-I-~-~~~~~~~-C=~~~"N-O-.--~~"~~ ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AX-71AG, ~"4 ENTERGY RIVER BEND STATION PAGE5~OF FLANGE QUALIFICA nON tINE NO. 12 1-4 S - 004 - I 1:3 - 2 1 NP:

SUBJECT:

QUALIFICATION OF FLANGED JOINTS (TABLE D) Baud On: £MTR-60S-0 (~r:'~ 30)"

b.

Emerlency Condition b-l Dead~eilht. Thermal and Dynamic LOlds ~ ocal Moments Mx (ft-lb) LOADS TOTAL (A) I.3 s (o8~rJoc.a) EMERGENCY DYNAMIC ** '3 (, TOTAL (e)

174 7"

Bendina lIoment

J(My}2 +

(Hz)~ My (ft-lb) t; 5 210 2~7 I

J( 2t..'7)2 + (3.~~)a
429 ft-lb

8.

Torsional HOllent

Mx

II 174 ft-lb 415/4/7 I

Mz (ft-lb) Ig~. I r; 3 337

9.

Opentin, prellure - Po

II '50o~S; < l.~P :II 1.5)(500.: 7S';',~;

Po: Haxillua operatina pre.lure durinl.. eraeney CODditioD (p.i)- soc f~j P: Desiln prellure (psi) *,00 P S l PI: luraeney condition pUllure concurrent with Hfd (psi) * 'fot) FSt Hfd : The lIaxi_WI of 7 or. I 7 4 fk,.,

Absolute combinatiOD of A aad emeraeney dyaa.ic
- Maxi.us value of.11 dyal.ic 10ld combination. for ** erleney condition

RBG ~47876*-. 'iM-_____ =---.,------=-:-:--==::---------r--~~_:;::~==_::__-...., Page 67 of 1 '~ CALCULATION CALC. NO. - REV.

e;ee ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AX-71AG, Rev. 4 RIVER BEND STATION EHTERGY FLANGE QUALIFICA nON tINE HO.

RH$-004.119.-2 ~p~

SUBJECT:

QUALIFICATION or FLANGED JOINTS (TABLE £) laud Ora: EMTR-60S-0 ( RE. F". )

c.

Faulted ConditioD c-l Deldwei,ht. Thermll and Dynamic Loadl ~ OCIl MOllents Hx (ft-lb LOADS TOTAL (A) ( 3 ~ FAULTED DYNAMIC ** 174. TOTAL (D) * ( ~ 2.

11.

BendiDI.oment * /(Hy)2 + (Hz)2 3 8 r 415/417 I 42D

I( ~lf)2 +

(420)2 S ~ 7 ft-lb

12. Torsional HomeDt Hx 19:2.

ft-lb

13.

Operltina pres.ure

Po. ~o~ psi

14.

Allowable 1I0aent * (11250 ~ - ti) DJ Pt) F~c/12

(II'tS 0 )C 15.2, - if" 1'.2S t

J( 500) ".!ill... 211212-

11.

I:r.LJJ I "fdSO 1250 ~ - fi) D~ P f) -& (~fkJ ' Po: Haxi~ operatina pressure durinl faulted condition (psi) * ~~ Pi; P: DedlD prellure (pit) * 'S oc) psi P,: FaultecJ condition pre.. ure concurrent with Htd (psi) * '500 r s, Hfcl : The uxi.. of 11 or 12 *. S fs:, 7-r~- Lit Ab.olute co.binatioD of A and faulted dynaa1c Haxia~ v.lue of.11 dynaaic load combination. for faultecl condition

RBG-4787o"* Page 68 of 131 CALCULATION ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT RIVER BEND STATION ENTERGY VENT & DRAIN QUAUFICATION: The following Vents & Drains are qualified generically by Calculation PX-S8-316: Valve No: R/-iS*V1229 RHS*V112 and V113 RHS*V51 RHS&V52 ICS*VF084 & VF085 ICS*VF061 & VF062 ICS*VF073 ICS*VF074 The following Vents & Drains are qualified with tie-back support: Valve No: ICS*VF034 1 E12"VF058A & VF059A RHS*V112 & V113 CALC. NO. - REV. AX-7tAG, Rev. 4 PAGE,"OF

RBG-47876 Page 69 of 131 r-~~---r----------------------------II--~~~------~ CALC. NO. - REV. AX-71AG, Rev. 4 CALCULATION ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT RIVER BEND STATION - --ENTERGY PAGE S70F SLEEVE CLEARANCES Piping displacements due to reanalysis of Rev. 4 have not changed significantly; either they have decreased at certain locations or Increased Insignificantly at some locations. The thermal load cases and Seismic Anchor Movement load case movements are not altered. and this analysis has used N411 damping values, which reduces the dynamic displacements. The onglnal values from previous revisions are still applicable.

-' RBG-47876 Encrosure ~. Page! 70 of 1'31 STONE e. WI::BSTER ENGINE E RING CORPORA TlO N CALCUL.ATION SHEET \\... ' I I 1 I, 10 II II .6 .1 II 10 j \\ u U IT I. n so , I U,. n

s.

u Sf "0 41, \\... .tI,... CALCULATION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER c;A J.O. Olt W.O. NO. 01SION (, GROUP I CALCULATION NO. JOPTIONAL TASK CODE PAGE_ I Z 210 if. NP(T) AX - 71 ~"'.. N/~ REV*4 , A 't -IIPP6 NO* 1'2.~ PIPE IAvf'S:,. i IN ~l.EE"e PJJE'Tf'A rio.... & NUP'PE! O\\JT PuT .,.UP\\P£,,,,PUT L(JAI> ~. CAlI. ~I'~ O&":L~!,D"_. _ 1'£" E nz~ ~~otJ S.UJ.\\ 'F i'a,-A,Wa .,D.-~'" rl()M No. {Hr. \\,iVT M'IT .... MtNe MG'.iT$..- '1. .007 .007 .J)U/Jt,4I&tH 7 5" r - '007 -.0°7 IJ!I/ eflAfl/' C.II~U) 'f..

111.

-/l'Z. THU~"'AI. (MAt.) '1 c.. -'007 -.001 B X -.014.1 -.011.4 fHe~/II#L (. MIll) c -001

QQ I 81.1' L J)f AI' (J.

~ 56rrl.6M6Nr 1. -Btl/LOIN&' ~e rlU !ll6lJr 2. )( ~ -21 0

!

Z55

!.005 O13eA t& 'Z +/-. 'l17 + 'Uo ...

003

)( "'4'0 +/- *~70 .... '010 ~5EA (za,eA) I!; t.4'3. ! *... 40 +.006 X -+

003

+/- *oo~ ()8EZ 12 il T.ooS ~ *oos I )( '!.01' +/- *ut, 'SS6Z I',) ~ ..... oo~

oo~

~NA'MIt! x

.008 l:

.008 (')4. a " 2.0 c ..,CIO '010 DYNAU/G 2.1 )( 'OO~ 'j:

uoS

(!!)UE ? 't -010 + '010 Jl)IIJII#I,4 )Co ! '009 'to -ouR 27 CJecF ~ _t.010 t ,'010 !rOTA!. ULI/"'~' I"'" QLDG.. It 08tA -+ 1lYIJAIAIf., ~ov' lI~ur$, = Dwr % :;:f'".j' ~1~~MIU't ~ttcJ / ()eG') DR ' =/ Ow, S.lMtR ~ 8LO". I + ~~-- .. D:lN Atl.le.. ',rn.fIlACMT -, (eGG1') .... INSIGoN'F'lcAtoJ"T (S~fF Po.. 2) NOreSt!.1. 'tW£ ~tca.N 0' '1!wr. ':tor-I.e.. ~~\\."TIV. t,AC)vf:Met4Ttt M.~.T If' ~E..'Gat 0... T"" ~"'M\\tM Co".,NAr&ON 011 DWT,.) -t"~"NUU.. A~O 6L.D'-* c:.£ T1"L£ Mt:U T.

2. r;rHC' M4'( I¥UN OF ~c,.~lja.. f! ffcJ A TIOJ4

~.~N ~~6,... fUccueo 0'" 'i!~ N'"." P...... I TO e.a C/)M~"ltaD ~'nf --'IB~~"~£ e.L.A~c.s

A

==RBG-47876 Page 71 of" p1 Sf ONE & WEBSTER ENGINEEkINC; COR"OR~flON I s 4 s, 7

0

".s 14 IS

t

.0 It \\.. U I. H a * . It SO S I lJ J4 Sf u 40

4.

\\. ** 4, a" .1.0. OR W.O. NO. 12210 AX ~ J./() PO CALCULATION SHEET CALCULATION IDENTIFICATION NlJMBE.R CALClJLATION NO. OPTIONAL fASt( CODE AX-iIAc,. N/A ~ev*4 S~ PAGE_ !:>LEEVE CLEA~A~c,e lOO~UJG ~02.n~ . - Z = 5 LtE. t£ C(.~AeANe6 LOO~ t lJ(;.. UP FA UIJG,. ~~T" 'I -"Z. .. 3* ft11S).... '0'30 'Z~

=:.4.3125,">

.. oto M )C..:r

rtt 4 '4t7$) -

.. \\~7" --)< = 'l *tS ") -- .. 0'2.5"

. ~ L££'"

C.lE.4~NcG I, ~ C('£PTA 6L.

. RBG-47876 Enclosure. 2 0#. Page 12 of 131' t' STONE ~ WEBSTER (NGINE£RING CORPORATION CAl.CUl.ATION SHEET CALCULATION IOENTI'ICATlON NUMa£1t ~O I, J.O. OR W.O. NO, WJ,ISION "'jGROUP I CALCUl.ATION NO, 10PT'ONAL TASK CODE PAGE_ ,2. 2.10 NP (T A~ -71 ACr-tJlA e.v*4 A~"IIDP6 110- "aT"'f~" "~f ""0-11.0 "111 J PIPE tA"~. IN SLEEVe P~E"T"ArION 4Q t,. Nup,pe O\\lT Pu,. ~uP,pa IMPUT L()A~ e.t$C etl', flf~ 0& F:'t.~!'~_. _ fEME nl"r~O"" SaU.." If ~8LAT'~. J)-- ~~ TI()/II No. 1),r. MVT M,'IT .... MfNE MIt.iT £,- t 10 -.c/3/**ocZ -.oll / -.001. J)UD~/&"H T .S r _~'O' /. 0044 0 ** 0/ -0041 II., lJ1IeIlI1Ilt (,N.U) ¥ - oJ1 '017 T/lf.~,nIlL (MAle) ~ .e- -I/O ' 1/0 .t

- rlle~IIIIL l MIll}

10 'f --021./ -'D~ "i- -.11;] --IIJ 8tJILPiAf(# f,6rr1.6M6NT.l

- -~/LOINt;,

10 fterlUJll6lJr 2- - y +/-

IZS

.It'l t. OQ~ OI3EA ,g ~ '!.U.I

~35

-t '00' I * ~.sl-A (z o,t~) "'(

11SC

2b~

-:t.008 ~ ~ *.,.i'l

470

.+/-

01 t

. \\ It,. Y .+/- '01101 r* QI"+ !)8El IZ i! i.011 i.011 It I 11 '( ~.021 -t.dD 'SS6Z c +/-.ou. l'.021 It JO J).Y##1II11!. Y

t '0 "

~ '0 I' 20 t:14 (J, CI ~

t *0 It

... *otV n D.::INA-U/G y

t.a,e.

.... '01' 2\\ <!JUg ~ i-ol9 -t -0 {' u 14 ilY1JA#f14 'Y

t.ot4

... 'ot,. 27 CX:Cp 1! +/-.OlS ,o2S U S. 11 U !rOT"" UL"TI1I6 I"'" 9U)G" I. t 09[1- + flYIJAIA/~ ~O"'M~ur$. = DWT% !J.~'t. :r ~'TTU;MIIlt - C!'u.u / ()eGJ) I. .0 DR.

/ Ow, 1 'IlleR 1. 81.0", !

+ ~~-- + D:lNI.IA,Ie.. "rt\\(IACWT -, (OGGP)

/NSI(,AJIF'"ANT (~Et P.f?

NOTe'!'t J. TH£ ~tQ.N D,. 'rHt 'lOTAL (&'t\\TI~.... ov(MeWTtt U.W.T er -rM-& .1~1f 0' T"," "'-'J""'\\6M eo".,NAr,"'" 0.. DW1.,.) 'tM£ftM.... AtJO SLD., CO~ TrL' Me", T.

2. ~H(' M4'( 1.. 1JN OF "e.'T"~a. f! "cJ~T~ ~~

__ N ~"1,~ fl.6'ccueo

6 tJU ?M. HCllT' PtA"r 't'O 68 c.oMPI'ltaD wIn. 11IC ~y£

~L.M~e.a *

-"RBG-47876 Page 73 of 1~ ~ STONE & WEISTER tN(;INE£ HINri C(JRt-ORA riOH CALCULATION SHEET 10" 1, 4 .0., t) 14 'S .1 n 10 0, IS \\ 14 l .~ II 11' ". I. '0 , I n H U Sl II S9 40 41.- 44 4S 41 CALCULATION IDEN1IF'ICATIONNUM8ER .1.0. OR W.O. NO. CALCULATION NO. OPTIONAL TASK COOf 12210 X - 71 A~.R.~* t-J/Ja AX ~ J.lO" 'BET"'(f'" '" OC~.... 0. Ito" I" 1 !::>LEEVE CLEA~A.~c,e LOO~l~(O ~02.r" - 'Z = 2'" z.. f." ,j:z.of,,' -~ = 3~ !rOTA \\.. JlC ~,,"" 'M()'I~ '" e t,&, TS. 1:: 'l.9'l75" )

'So

=- A* A'J7~" '>...,.

l'5,

= <4.1175",..... '0'7

== 1. 1?S").. .o6~ .':. S"L~EV~ c.LeAi.AN(.eS A ~ A (,(. E P 1'A S\\."

=

N/A &>1

RBG-47876 Page 74 of 131 STONE

weSTER eNGINEERING CORPORA nON CALClLA TION SI-EET JO. OR we. NO.

12210 DIVI&ON

GROUP CALCULATION NO.

OPTIONAL TASK cooe IfP(C) AX-7' AG( 2ev.4 ~~ PAGE_ REF. SLEEVE CLEARANCE EVALUATION NOce.5 NUPIPE Output MUPIPE Input Lo.d c. ** D.scription ca.e )(0. Pip. O.flection Pen.trat10n Sum of Relativ. Mov.ment Mov.ments x .005 81 ~ -.0/2 -005 Dudw.iaht -.0 / 2.. )C: -.00,2 0 -.00:3 Thermal (N+U) ')< -.007 0 -.007 Thermal (Max.) 2& .c -.013 0 -.0/3 Thermal (Min.) aulldin9 Settl...nt 1 Buildin9 Settlement 2 OBn OBE1 SSEI 87 40 4/ .02Lo .009 ,00'1 .0£4 .0/7 .0/7 .07'2 OVnamic OCCU 45 ./-zG, nvnamfc OCCP Total Relative Movement. Or

I
I

.074-55 ./~ .075 . / '3/ + + 8uildin9 DW'l' - The. - Settlement + + Bui1din9 Wf - The. - Settl..-nt .074- .07'5 I + + 1)yanIa1c - OBEA - (OCCU/oca) I + + 1)yanIa1c - SSIA - (occr) Not ** I 1. Th ** iCJn of the total relative movements.u.t be the I1CJn of the 1lUa... c:aab1natJ.on of Oudwa19ht, Thermal and Building S.ttl..ant.

2. The... t.J-of either equation.hown above 11 recorded.

on the nut page to be compared. with the 11HYe clearance. 't-:: /.~5 -.001 ~O/~.oZy~.075 ~.105" J; -: /-.01'2. -.0'3 ~ol".024 ~./31 ~.180"

/'ZG
RBG-47876 Page 75 of 131 STONE
WESSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION CALCULATION SH:ET CALCIAA TION 100NTIFICA TION NUMBER

(,3 JOo OR WOo NO. DIVISION

GROUP CAlCUlA TlnN NO.

OPTIONAl. TASK COOl PAG!_ 12210 HP(C) AX-7' A<i;f rzeY.4

REP, SLEEVE CLEARANCE EVALUATIOK Sleeve Clearance Lookini Korth y

Total Relative Movcentl -z

z -

z -z y * -y - -y Sheve Clearance Lookini Ea.t y -x * -x y * -y * -y Sleeve Clearance Looking Up racini Korth NOPe 5 x N1(A/, I, -z - I'IZ

/,5 -

.180 z

Ire."
/.S"-

,leo* z -z e3;8' , 01<, ,/o5~.. x -

~a75-

-x - 2~~ -'2,375- , /05 Conclusion z. of< i I

RB'G-47876 Page 76 of 131 J(). OR We. NO. 12210 REF. NOC 71 STONE

WEBSTER eNCiINEERING CORPORATION CALcu.A TION SI-&T CA£.CULA TION ICENTlflCA TlON ~ER DIVISION. GROUP CAlCUlATION NO.

OPTIONAl. TASK COO! JfP(C) AX-7' ~ 12eI.~ SLEEVE CLEAlWIC!! EVALUATION WPIPI Output IWPIP! Input Load ea.e Cescription ca.e Mo. Pi~ OeUection Penetration Sum of Relative Oir. MoVement Mov_ent Movements Deadweight Thermal (H+U) Thermal (Mu.) Thermal (Min.) Buildin9 Settlement 1 Buildinq Settlement 2 oaEA OBEI SSEI Dvnalllic accu DvnaDlic acc, Total RelatiVe Movement. Or o o o .76.7 .008 . COS 40 . 005 .00<0 41 .010 , 058 .o~8 45 ./OE .86

IO~

.o:s!!:J ./0 I + + Build1n9 tINT - 'l'her. - Settl.-.nt I + + Dyanmic - oln - (OCCU/OCCI) I I + + nyan.1c - SSD - (occr) + + Buildin9 DWf - Ther. - Sett1-.nt Mote': 1. The sign of the total relative 1DOV8IINantJ IlUlt be the lign of the... S ** ccabin&tion of Deac1wai'iht, Theral and lul1tllnV Settl8Mllt.

2. The axial. of either equation.hown above i. recorded on the nut,PAve to be compared with the Il.."e clearance.

"Jt.=/ a ~.7(07.;0.01<1/ +.OItJ,.;..05~ ** &0" ~ = /-.OOZ<l-.'Zo7-.00/ /.;.. oC(3 +./0'9 =.3'2/'" -.ooz. .~ . (joEi .c~ .010 ./~ .108 .IQ'1

RBG-47876 Page 77 of 131 STOM:, WEBSTER ENGiNEeRING COAPORA TlON CALcu.A TION SI-EET CAl.CULA TION IOeN11FICA TlON NUMBeR JO. OR WOo NO. 12210 ClVISION. GROll' CAlCULATION NO. OPTIONAL TASK CODE WP(C) AX-7 ( AGf lUV.4.

FIEF, SLEEVE CL!ARANCE EVALUATIOH Sle.ve Clearance Looking North y

Total aelative Mov_entl -z

z z

-z y -y - -y Sle.ve Clearance Looking !&It y -x

x
x

-x y -y

Sleeve Clearance Looking Up Facing North NODe 7/

,4/111, ~ ~1tGIf z:, I RfJQ1tJA/. ~~Ie" -z *

~.S7.S-

.av 2~i " 3'2./ t z *

2, ~75-z

-z I"l/i

/,B7~:

x * .8G;O" -x * /76"

/1875:
86,0" conclulion I. DI<

i

RBG-47876 Page 78 of 131 STCN;

WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORA nON CALCLl.A TION SteT CALCULA nON 100NTIFtCA nON NUMBER

!.J;v JO. OR wo. NO. DMSION

GROUP CA1.ClJLA TION NO.

OPTIONAL TASK. COOE PAGE 12210 nee) AX-r I Ac::, ~.4-REF. SLEEVE CLEARANCE EVALUATION NODe Joe> HOPIPI Output HUPIPI Input Lo.! Ca.e Ca.e Pipe Deflection Penetration SwIl of Relative Description No. Dir. Movement Movement MOvement. E/ y -.014- -.014 Deadweiqht ~ .~ -,Cb~ eo y

C>S4 0

.a£4. Thermal (N+U). t .003 0 .003 '2~ y . //8 0 ./18 Thermal (Max.) i! .~~ 0 .~~ ~3 y .Ol? 0 .015 Thermal {Min.} 1!- .002 0 ,ooz. Building I'l-c~ y .CJ04. c .00.1-Setthment 1 Z Ift.N i!: .0 0 0 Building z,.~ Y -.'Z72 -.2.70 -.aoz. Settlement 2

Z Rl/N e-O C

0 87 y ./9S. ./81 .0/4-08EA i: .BI4- .e/~ .00/ y .028 SSEA _(2-08£.\\) C .0<)'2.. Y .004. .0a4 OBEl 40 i!- .007 .007 Y .Cl08 .008 SSEI 4-1 -a .013 .0/3 4.15 y

c:ASo

.O~O OVnamic oceo -c .075 . 67.5 gS y .o~ .050 Dynamic OCCI -Co

075

.075 'I .05/ .~~/ f'IuTI.",IC 0CC1' 8CD i!:

07~

. o7~ Total Relative I + + Building I + + Dyanmic Mov.mentl DWr - Ther. - Settlement - OBO - (OCCU/OCCI) Or I + + Building I + + DyanlDJ.c DN"%' - Ther. - Settlement - SSIA - coca) NotelJ 1. The lign of the total relative mov-.nt. IIlUlt be the lign of the... t.wa combination of Deadweight, Ther.al and Building Settl-.nt.

2. The mu1a.lJl of either equation shown above il recorded on the nut PAge to be cOIIIpU'ed wi tb the Ileeve clearance.

~ I.f =/-.C>l4 +-.//8 +.004/+.0'2.8 +.o~/ =./87 i5.=. /~ oo~ ~.oo~ of- 0/+. ooz. +-.07G,... 071 II

RBG-47876 Page 79 of 131 STONE

weBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION CAlClLA TION SH:ET CAl.CULA TION toeNTFICA nON NUMBER

~7 JO, OR WOo NO. DIVISION

GROUP CA1.CUI.A nON NO.

OPTIONAL TASK COOl PAQI-12210 IfP(C) AX-71 A~ ~.4 REF. SLEEVE CLEARANCE EVALUA~IOK Sleeve Clearance Looking Korth NODE. /CX) y Total Relative MIN. Movement. /~6'

CJ7~4'

./.tI,2S - -z

Z
1~8'
;'~t'5:'

.079* z -z / I~~' - lei' 01< y *

'8/~ -

-y * / 1?f~1

/*8/~*'-

. 187" -y Sleeve Clearance Lookinv Ealt y -x

x
x

-x y * -y * -y Sleeve Clearance Look1ng Up Pacinv Korth x -z

z
z

-z x

COnclusion :
01::-

RBG-47876 Page 80 of 131 STOM!

WEBSTER ENGINEeRING COAPOAA TION CALCLLA TION SI-EET CALCULATION 100001FlCA TlON NUMBER J(). OR woo No.

12210 DMSION

GROUP CAlCULATION NO.

OPTI()NAL. TASK COCE DeC) U-7t AGt 2RI.4 PAGE - REF. SLEEVE CLEARANCE EVALUATIOK NUPIPE Output WPIPE Input Load CA ** O.scription CA ** No. PiP41 Det lect10n Pen.tration Sua ot Relative Oir. Movemant MoVement Movement. Oea4w.ioht Thermal (N+U) Thermal (Mu.) Thermal (Min.) Buildin9 Settlement 1 Building Settlement 2 OBEA OBE1 SSEI rhrn.mf C OCCU* rhrn*... c cx:::c:E Dynamic OCCP Total R.lativ. MOvement.

I
I

~/ ')<. .0/0 Y .0::31 81 40 ,ozo .0..33 41 y .II'Z y

-2/(,

y ./15 y

'212.'1

+ + Build1n9 DWr - Ther. - Settlement + + Bu1ldin9 DWl' - Ther. - S.ttlement .010 .078 . '2/'2. ~COI .czo . o~ .IIZ ./1'2,

lIS I

+ + Dyanm1c - OHA - {OCCU/OCC!} I + + Dyanmic - SSu. - (OCCJ') )lot.,: 1. Th ** 1911 of the total ~.lativ. lIOV..ant. IlUlt be the 1191\\ of the... 1IIuII cOllbination of DMdwe19ht, Theral and aUildin9 Settl.-.nt.

2. '!'h. lllUialJI ot either equation lhown above il recorded on the nut P&9. to be caapared. with the Ileev. clearanc **

f' ~;. /.alO +.21'2. +- 0 1+.002 r.llo *

QP/1 Y J:. /

-. 031 +-,082>"" oj +.oo"Z. +.'Z'Z1 =' * '2~" -,03/ .~ o .o~z

RBG-47876 Page 81 of 131 STONE. WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION CALCULA TION SHEET CAL.Cll.A TION lCENTIFlCA TlON NUMBER JO. OR WOo NO. 12210 OIVISION

GROUP HP(C)

CALCUl.ATION NO. OPTIONAL TASK COOE AX-7 (AGr ~.4 REF. SLEEVE CLEARANCE EVALUATION Sleeve Clearance Looking North y -z

z z

-z y -y * -y Sleeve Clearance Looking Ealt /<h{;). y MIA/, -x

3U(."

X

B~*

x -x y *

3"

-y

a"

-y Sleeve Clearance Looking Up Pacing North -z

z
z

-z x -x * -a Conclulion I Total Relative Movement I 295 .3 I, IZS-

3391(
.3. 'Z~ :'

. 3'3'1'

.$,0 " -

. '288"

~.D" -

.'268"

- =RBG=478 Enclosure 2 Page 82 of 131 e EtflCRGY YES NO x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x CALCULATION CALC. NO. - REV. ADDENDUM AX-71AG, Rev. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ATTACHMENT NO.: RIVER BEND STATION PAGE 70 OF CALCULATION CHECKLIST N/A FORMAT EDP-AA-20 SECTION Cover Page completed. 6.4.1 Table of Contents completed (as required). 6.4.2 Revision History Sheet completed (as required). 6.4.3 x Revisions are identified with revision lines in right margin. 6.4.3 Applicable Documents Page completed. 6.4.4 x Definitions established (as required). 6.4.5 Calcu1ation!revision/addendumlpage numbers are identified correctly. 6.4.10 CONTENTS Previous calculation for the required analysis exists. 6.3 Calculation is appropriately titled for the intended scope. 6.4.1*2 Purpose and scope are clearly and adequately established. 6.4.1-7,7.1 Safety classification is correct for the identified sc::ope. 6.4.1-6 Topics/documents/equipment for cross-reference/retrieval are identified. 6.4.1-11 Calculation is clear and comprehensible. 6.1 Applicable codes, standards, etc. are idc:ntified. 6.4A-l RBS references are idc:ntified 6.4.4-2 Affected documents are identified 6.4.4-3 inputs and sources are identified, appropriate, and correct. 7.2.2-1 Assumptions are identified and appropriate. 7.2.2-2 x [nputs derived from field walkdown have been witnessedlverified 7.2.2-5 Engineeringjudgments are identified and appropriate. 7.2.2-6 Calculation methodology is identified and supported by technical bases. 7.2.3 Conclusion is appropriate and is justified by calculation. 7.3 x Confirmations are identified and indicated as required on Cover Page. 7.5.7 x Directions for Confinnations are included. 7.5.7-3 Calculation data is appropriately included, attached, or referenced. 7.4 Programs and software are identified and have been verified and validated. 8.0 Methods/calculations use to check results are identified and included. Results are accurate and in accordance with the established methodology. x Certification by Professional Engineer is required. 11.7 VENDOR CALCULATIONS x Calculation is perfonned in accordance with EDP-AA-2S. 10.2 x Calculation content and format are acceptable. 10.2 x Vendor, prepan:r, reviewer, and approver are clearly identified. 10.3 Design verification review has been completed (as applicable). Preparer (Signature/KCN or SSNlDate): (~~ ..I... _ -"7T '.~ ~~J) ~/I~ / '77 Reviewer (Signature/KCN or SSNlDate): ~~(H05) 6/18/97

RBG-47876 Page 83 of 131 CALCULATION ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT RIVER BEND STATION ENTERGY REVIEWER'S CHECKLIST Item Calc ( Page C'nm-mt'ntl: nUVlu.~ By ('j . ResolVedBY t,~~ (~W5) 6/18/97 Revie?ler KeN Date

"Y'

-KCN Date CALC. NO. - REV. A nn~NDUM AX-71AG~ Rev. B ATTACUMENTNO:': PAGE iT OF .~.tn - ~ R, R~"';;w<a KCN -Date

~BG -47S76 Page 84 of 131 CALCULATION CALC. NO. - REV. ADDENDUM AX-7IAG, Rev. 4 e ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ATfACHMENTNO.: _-.-.-'w RIVER BEND STATION ENTERGY PAGE 72.0F Design Verification Record Document No. AX-7lAG, Rev. 4 METHOD Verification methods to be used: X Design Review Qualification Testing Alternate Calculations DOCUMENT(S) REVIEWED: (Attach Additional Sheet(s), if needed) Document No. Revision Doc:ument Title AX*7lAG 4 ~~ ~71-.-1~ 9'-'-00 ~.

SUMMARY

OF REVIEW: (Attach Additional Sheet(s), ifneeded) Acceptable as is. Design Verification Completed By ~~ (.1105) Date vjlg/97 Co~RcsolutionA_ted Q Date 11~2.()-17 Engineering Supervisor ~l )1) Cj)V, Date

RBG-47876 Page 85 of 131

===~ ENTERGY ( CALCULATION COVER PAGE ENGINEERING DEPARTl\\'1ENT RIVER BEND STATION CALC. NO. - REV. ADDENDUM AX-71AG, Rev.4A ATTACHMENT NO.: (as required) JBI NO.: G13.10.2.2 PAGE 1 OF 6

Title:

Pipe Stress Analysis For ICS FWlction Added Through FWS System Per rvtR96-0069 CALCULATION o APPROVED

PENDING ON IMPLEMENT A TlO OF MR 96-0069 o CANCELED STAT liS:

o PENDING ON COl\\']iIRl\\<L\\TIONS SYSTEM NO.: lO7fFWS I MA..RKNO.: R~S-OIO'Ob5'-2 CLASSIFICATION:

SAFETY RELATED NON-8AFETY RELATED:

OQAPA D NON-QAPA PURPOSE I SCOPE I OBJECTIVE: To qualify the welding tee due to a reduction in the wall thickness which was required for final fit up during construction. CONCLUSION: The piping remains within the code allowables. SOFTWARE USED FOR CALCULATION: DYES .NO SDDF#: Manufacturer: Name VersionlRclease No. KEYWORDS: Licensing/Design Basis Impact

Addressed in DCA No.

rvtR 96-0069 FWS,ICS D Licensing/Design Basis Impact Checklist included o None - Reason: REVIEW & APPROVAL t~~ VA 4-15-Q' ~~ 6:c.!u. s.13/tt~ f1t<J,<;~t/i l n-t1 Brian Lanka, KCN 1311 (SignatureIDate) ( ignature/Date) Preparer C1 Reviewer (Non-Safety) Supervisor gj Design Verification Reviewer (printed Name, KeN, or SSN) (Printed Name, KeN, or SSN) RAJ£'Sk GVP'l7\\ I (os<1 RECE\\VED MAY 041999 SA Tie

RBG-47876 Page 86 of 131

===~ CALC. NO. - REV. ADDENDUM AX-71AG, Rev.4A ATTACHMENT NO.: (as required) JBI NO.: GI3.10.2.2 ENTERGY CALCULATION ENGINEERING DEPARTlVlENT RIVER BEND STATION PAGE 2 Revision No. 4A Paragraph No. REVISION HISTORY Description of Change To qualify the welding tee due to a reduction in the wall thickness during frnal fit up during construction.

RBG-47876 Page 87 of 131 -ENTERGY CALCULATION CALC. NO.-REV.ADDENDUM AX-71AG, Rey. 4A ENGINEERING DEPARTME'NT ATTACHMENT NO.: (as required) RIVER BEND STATION JBI NO.: Gl3.10.2.2 PAGE 3 REFERENCE DOCUMENTATION L Control Document Cross References (Page four of NORMS): Other Calculations, Procedures, Drawings, etc. Identify how documents are affected. EFFECT (Check One) DOC. NO.(Control Xrefs) REV. NO. TYPE Supplemented Superseded Voided Reference Only

1.

AX-71AG 4-CALCSW X ll. Record Cross References (page five of NOIU.ttS): RBS change documents, ERs, :MRs, Calculation Addenda, etc. Identify how documents are affected. EFFECT (Check One) RECORD NO. CRee Xref) REV NO TYPE Supplemented Supaseded Voided Reference Only

1.

MR.96-0069 0

MR X

m. Miscellaneous References (Misc Ref): Applicable codes, standards, & references (non-RBS):

l. ASME B &PV Code, 1974 Edition.

2. NA VCO Piping Datalog, lOUl Edition.

RBG-47876 Page 88 of 131 CALCULATION \\VORK SHEET CALC. NO. - REV. ADDENDUM AX-71AG, Re\\,. 4A

===~ ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT A'ITACHMENT NO.: (as required) JBI NO.: G13,10.2.2 ENTERGY RIVER BEND STATION PAGE 4 Calculation: During installation of the 10" welding tee (sch 160) at node point X98, the ends had to be machined to schedule 120 to allow proper fit up to pipe line RHS-OI0-065-2 (Sch 120). This tee was modeled and designed as a sch. 160 tee. The ME I 0 1 analysis (Ref. 1.1) considered the tee to be schedule 160. For the tee to be welded to the pipe, the ends had to be machined to sch 120. This calculation will qualify the tee stress as if it was schedule 120, which is conservative. Since only the thickness of the end of the tee is reduced, the change in weight will be negligible. Design Input: Properties are per Ref. II1.2. Pipe Size Schedule TIrickness r - mean radius 10" 120 0.843" 4.9535" 10" 160 1.125" 4.8125" PiI!e Stress The reduction in wall thickness affects mechanical stress and pressure stress. Pressure stress is calculated by P D I 4 t and mechanical stress is calculated by i M I z By. changing the thickness from 1.125" to 0.843" the pressure stress will increase 1.125 10.843 or 33%. The mechanical stress is calculated by i M I Z. Per NC-3652.4, Z ::: 1t r t. Where r is the mean radius. Thus Z 120 = 1t (4.9535)2 (0.843) "" 65.0 in) Z 160 =1t (4.8125)2 (1.125) = 81.9 in) Thus, the section modulus will change by 81.9 165 or 26%. The change in thickness will also affect the SIF for a welding tee. Per Ref. ill.l, SIF== 0.9! (4.4 t/r}667 Thus SIF 120 = 0.9 I (4.4'" 0.S43 14.9535)*667== 1.09 SIF 160 = 0.9 I (4.4... 1.125/4.8125) 667 = 0.88 = 1.00 Since the SIF can not be less than 1.00. Thus the mechanical stress will increase by 1.09... 1.26 = 1.37. This value envelops the pressure stress term and will conservatively be used to increase the equation stresses. Existing stresses per Ref. 1.1. Equation Node Existing Stress New Stress (1.37... Allowable Margin (Psi) Existing Stress) Equation 8 X99-X97 4209 5766 15000 0.39 Equation 9B X99-X97 6185 8473 18000 D.lf7 Equation 9C X99-X97 6196 8489 27000 0 *.31 Equation 9D X99-X97 6241 8550 36000 0.24 Equation 10 X99-X97 5269 7219 22500 0.32 High Energy Not Applicable per Ref. 1.1 Eq 9B + 10

. Pipe stresses are within their allowables.

RBG-47876 Page 89 of 131

!!!=

---........ --ENTERGY YES NO X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X CALCULATION CALC. NO. - REV. ADDENDUM AX-71AG, Re\\'. 4A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT A TIACHMENT NO.: (as required) JBI NO.: G13.10.2.2 RIVER BEND STATION PAGE 5 CALCULATION CHECKLIST N/A FORMAT EDP-AA-20 SECTION Cover Page completed. 6.4.1 X Table of Contents completed (as required). 6A.2 Revision History Sheet completed (as required). 6.4.3 X Revisions are identified with revision lines in right margin. 6.4.3 Applicable Documents Page completed. 6.4.4 X DefInitions established (as required). 6.4.5 Calculationlrevision/addendum/page numbers are identified correctly. 6.4.10 CONTENTS Previous calculation for the required analysis exists. 6.3 Calculation is appropriately titled for the intended scope. 6.4.1-2 Purpose and scope are clearly and adequately established. 6.4.1-7, 7.1 Safety classification is correct for the identified scope. 6.4.1-6 Topics/documents/equipment for cross-reference/retrieval are identified. 6.4.1-11 Calculation is clear and comprehensible. 6.1 Applicable codes, standards, etc. are identified. 6.4.4-1 RES references are identified. 604.4-2 Affected documents are identifIed 6.4.4-3 Inputs and sources are identified, appropriate, and correcL 7.2.2-1 Assumptions are identified and appropriate. 7.2.2-2 X Inputs derived from field walkdown have been witnessedlverified 7.2.2-5 Engineering judgments are identified and appropriate. 7.2.2-6 Calculation methodology is identified and supported by technical bases. 7.2.3 Conclusion is appropriate and is justified by calculation. 7.3 X Confirmations are identified and indicated as required on Cover Page. 7.5.7 X Directions for Confmnations are included. 7.5.7-3 Calculation data is appropriately included, attached, or referenced. 7.4 X Programs and software are identified and have been verified and validated. 8.0 X Methods/calculations use to check results are identified and included. Results are accurate and in accordance with the established methodology. X Certification by Professional Engineer is required. 11.7 VENDOR CALCULATIONS X Calculation is perfonned in accordance with EDP-AA-20. 10.2 X Calculation content and format are acceptable. 10.2 X Vendor, preparer, reviewer, and approver are clearly identified. 10.2 X Design verification review!l~heen completed (as applicable). Preparer (SignaturelKCN or SSNIDate): Iii.. - -1 A " -1)-'1 9 //3/1\\ Reviewer (SignaturelKCN or SSNIDate): r;:-~ ~ ~df1 J_ ~~A'1 I... (qr69 )

RBG-47876 Page 90 of 131 ~

, -= --

ENTERGY ( CALCULATION CALC. NO. - REV. ADDENDUM AX-71AG, Rev. ~A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ATTACHMENT NO.: (as required) JBINO.: G13.10.2.2 RIVER BEND STATION PAGE 6 Design Verification Record Document No. AX-71AG, Rel'. "A METHOD Verification methods to be used: X Design Review Qua1ificatioo Testing Alternate Calculations DOCUMENT(S) REVIEWED: (Attach Additional Sheet(s), ifneeded) Document No. Revision Document Title AX-71AG. 4A

SUMMARY

OF REVIEW: (Attach Additional Sheet(s), if needed) Acceptable as is. Design Verification Completed By ~ c..~ CoQ{5.) Date ~/3/f1 Comments Resolution Accepted By Date Engineering Supervisor fk,)~ Go;£R / 5-3-11 /kw 1054 Date S-3~~J r- {-

~! £~TERGY Record Revision Notice Department DE Document No. IJ X - 7/ Page I of2 6.n-04i1 ~1 J'J rJ Revlsloru te FileNet Location IB[XNo. (ASG Ui qrJ}'Yp 1{ s qr -of}!., 6 Batch/Transmittal - Item No. Revision Description Change the status of the calculation from Pending to Approved. Reason For Revision MR96-0069 was implemented during RF-OS. RECEIVED JUN 2 3 1999 BATIC Approvals: Originato Section Supervisor Date 6;£,z;f f

RBG-47876 Page 92 of 131..

=

ENTERGY ( CALCULATION COVER PAGE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT RIVER BEND STATION CALC. NO. - REV. ADDENDUM AX-71AG, Rev.4A ATTACHMENT NO.: (as required) JBI NO.: 013.10.2.2 PAGE I OF 6

Title:

Pipe Stress Analysis For leS Function Added Through FWS System Per ~1R.96-o069 '\\. CALCULATIO~)~~ APPROVED

PEi'iBHI6 e~1 JMP!.El'ttENTATION OF MR 96-0069 QCANCELED STATUS:

tq' a PENDING ON CONFIRMATIONS SYSTEM NO.: lO7IFWS , MA.RKNO.: Rl45 -01(),0"5"-2 CLASSIFICATION:

SAFETY RELATED NON-5AFETY RELATED:

ClQAPA Q NON-QAPA PURPOSE / SCOPE I OBJECTIVE: To qualify the welding tee due to a reduction in the wall thickness which was required for final fit up during construction. CONCLUSION: The piping remains 'within the code allowables. SOFfWARE USED FOR CALCULATION: aYES .NO SDDF#: Manufacturer: Name VersioD/Rdease No. KEYWORDS: Liceasing/Design Basis Impact

Addressed in DCA No.

MR.96"{)069 FWS~ICS Cl LicensingfDesign Basis Impact Cbecldist included a None - keasoo: REVIEW & APPROVAL Ij;~ VA 't-I 5-9, ~I~c;;,~, 5h/r..f ~'Jh~ L S*3-'J'j Brian Lanka, KCN 1311 (SignatureJDate) ( ignaturelDate) Preparer a R~iewer (Non-Safety) Supervisor m Design Verification Reviewer (Printed Name. KeN, or SSN) (Printed Name, KCN. or SSN) RAJ£5k GuPTA I (oSOJ RECEIVED RECEiVEO MAY 041999 JUN 2 3 1999. SA TIC

RBG-47876 Page 93 r.f 1 ':l.1 - '.'!tQ:~ ~---- -ENTERGY TITLE: CALCULATION COVER PAGE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT RIVER BEND STATION. St~ess Analysis for ICS Piping in the Reactor Building per MR 96~0069 CALC.NO.~ AX-76A Rev.3E ATTACHMENT NO.: JBI NO.: G13.10.2.2 PAGE 1 OF ' ~ SUPERSEDES: N/A ' ._

___ **** 0..............

. ~ """ '" ~.' ...................'! ***.* o....... SUPPLEMENTS: AX~ 76A Rev. 3 CALCULATION STATUS: DAPPROVED

PENDING DCANCELED SYSTEM NO.: 209

, lMARKNO.: CLASsmICATION:

SAFETY RELATED I

NON~SAFETY RELATED: D QAPA DNON-QAPA I P~OSE I SCOPE IOBJECfIVE: To document the cbanges implemented by MR 96-0069. This MR re:.routes the RCIC injection from the reactor vessel head to the feedwater nozzle. As a result of this changes, line.ICS-006-6~1 is removed and ICS-006-S7-1 is downgraded to ASME class 2 and abandoned in plac,e. CONCLUSION: The changes implemented by MR 96-0069 are acceptable. The removal of line ICS-006-6-1 reduces the loads on the RPV head nozzle and the Drywell Bellows Penetration DRB*Z130. Likewise, the abandonment of ICS-006~S7-2 gre~tly reduces the stress acting on the piping and the support loads acting on penetration DRB*Z130, penetration KJB*Z19, and pipe supports. Therefore, the piping systems analyzed by thjs calculation remain within the allowables of the ASME Section ill Code. SOFTWARE USED FOR CALCULATION: D YES DNO SDDF#: N/A Manufacturer: Name Version!Release No. CONFIRMATIONS REQUIRED: DYES.NO I q>NFIRMATION COMPLETE: DYES ONO DN/A KEYwORDS: ICS, ~ 96-0069, RCIC I REVIEW & APPROV ~ /'""'\\ ~ ~ '-1("-91 \\ ~"' ~'~h~ k{[~>hQuJ)4.-' II-I"-~n .-... ~ 'CI [, fl> ~7 (SignaturelDate) P.~Signature7Date) I I ~aturelDate) Preparer D viewer (Non-Safety) Supervisor Camilo Cuadra, KCN 0969 ~esign Verification Reviewer (Printed ~ame, KeN, or SS1'9 (Printed Name, KCN, or SSN) f2AJ&>H,GvPTA I loSj

RBG-47876 Page 94 of 131 =-==- ~- ENTERGY SECTION N/A N/A 1.0 2.0 3.0. N/A CALCULATION CALC.NO.-REV.ADDEND~ AX-76A Rev.3E ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ATIACHMENT NO.: RIVER BEND STATION JBIND,' PAGE 2 OF Pipe Stress Analysis for (CS in the Reactor Building per MR 96-0069 TABLE OF CONTENTS DESCRIPTION PAGE NO. REVISION mSTORY 3 APPLICABLf: DOCUMENTS 4 ISOMETRICS 5 CALCULATION DETAILS 7 CALCULATION CHECKLIST 8 DESIGN VERIFICATION CHECKLIST 9 ~ Total Pages: 9

RBG-47876 Page95ro~f~13~1~ ____ ~ ______________________ ~ __________ ~ CALCULATION CALC. NO. - REV. ADDENDUM AX-76A Rev.3E *

==~

ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ATTACHMENT NO.: (as requ.ired) JBI NO.: ENTERGY Revision No. 3A RIVER BEND STATION Pipe Stress An~lysis for ICS in the Reactor Building per MR 96-0069 REVISION mSTORY Paragraph Description of Change No. All Per MR 96-0069, the piping' is rerouted through the RHR system. As a result of this cbange, the piping in this calculation is either removed or abandoned in place.

RBG-47876 Page 96 of 131 - CALCPLATION CALC.NO.-REY.ADDEND~ AX-76A Rev.3E ~ ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ATTACHMENT NO.: I JBINO.: RIVER BEND STATION ENTERGY PAliE..4 OF Pipe Stress Analysis for ICS in tbe Rea'?tor Building per MR 96-0069 I APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS L APPLICABLE CODES, STANDARDS. & REFERENCES (NON-RBS): I. ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code, Section III, Division I, 1974 Edition D. RBS

REFERENCES:

1. MR 96-0069 ill. AFFECfED DOCUMENTS:

DOC-NO. REV. DOCUMENT TITLE AFFECf CHANGE NO. (Superseded, Revised. Initiated, etc.) DOC. Z-76-3009A 0 Pipe Support Calculation VOID MR.96-0069 Z-76-3009A . OA Pipe Support Calculation VOID MR.96-0069 1Z-76-3012A 0 Pipe Support Calculation VOID MR.96-0069 Z-76-3012A OA Pipe Support Calculation VOID MR.96-0069 Z-76-3023A 0 . Pipe Support Calculation VOID MR.96-0069 Z-76-3023A

OA Pipe Support Calculation VOID MR96-0069 1221O-N-SR-140
lA Support Stress Report REVISED MR96-0069 122 1 O-N-SR-l 43 IA Support Stress Report REVISED MR. 96-0069 12*210-N-SR-153 IA Support Stress Report REVISED MR96-0069 12210-N-$R-144 lA Support Stress Report REVISED MR96~OO69 12210-N-SR-145 lA Support Stress Report REVISED MR96-0069 12210-N-SR-146 lA Support Stress Report REVISED MR.96-0069 12210-N-SR-147 lA Support Stress Report REVISED MR96-0069 122tO-N-SR-148 lA Support Stress Rep*ort REVISED MR96-0069 11210-N-SR-149 lA Support Stress Report REVISED MR96-0069 12210-N-SR-150 lA Support Stress Report REVISED MR96-0069 12210-N-SR-151 lA Support Stress Report REVISED MR96-0069 1221O-N-SR-155 lA Support Stress Report REVISED MR96-0069 AX-002H 3C Pipe Stress Calculation GENERATED.

MR96-0069

RBG-47876 Enclosur 2~ Page97 f.... ~ ENTERGY CALCULATION WORK SHEET ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT RIVER BEND STATION CALC.NO.-REV.ADDEND~ AX-76A Rev.JE AITACHMENT NO.: JBINO.: PAGE; OF

RBG-47876 ENTERGY C - -S c-o 1 d \\~ -.J - . ~ ~ ~ CALCULATION WORK SHEET ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT RIVER BEND STATION ....J ....J UJ..J g~ ~I ~ -.9(1') [<l Ul 0'" 0<< -i (I') v uJ <..J ....... x t1- <r I<) 0 ~ ~ w

RBG-47876 Page~~~~------------~--------------------------r-~--------~----------~ CALCULATION WORK SHEET ENTERGY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT RIVER BEND STATION CALCULATION DETAILS MR 96-0069 re-outes the RGIC Injection Point from the Reactor Head Spray connection to the A Loop of Feedwater via RHR. piping. As a result of this cbange, pipe line ICS-006-6-1 (Z-) is removed from the RPV vent and head spray aSsembly to the cIrywell bellows penetration DRB*Z130.

The flange at the RPV assembly is replaced by a blind flange, and the flange at DRB*Z130 replaced by plug as shown in the isometrics. Pipe supports associated with this pipe are removed. See isometrics. The remaining line ICS-006-57-2 (Z-) from DRB*Z130 to penetration lKJB*Z19 is abandoned in place.

The abandoned pipe, ICS-006-57-1(Z-), will be empty and capped at both ends which results in a considerable reduction in dead weight and nullification of the thermal and fluid transient loads. Therefore, the structural integrities of the piping, the pipe supports, and the penetrations are assured. The pipe supports associated with this line are downgraded to Class 2. Removal of ICS*006*6-1 (Z-) eliminates the loads on one side of the RPV vent and head spray assembly. Line MSS-002-72-1(Z-) connected to the other side of the assembly is not affected by MR 96*Q069. Thus, RPV nozzle N7 is now solely qualified in AX-2H. Since the total load acting on the nozzle is reduced, the nozzle remains qualified. The following table lists the pipe supports affected by this MR.: Support No. Cbange ICS*PSSH-3009-Al Removed ICS*PSSH-3023-Al Removed ICS*PSSP-30 12-A 1 Removed ICS-PSR-3013-A2 Downgraded to class 2 ICS-PSR-3014-A2 Downgraded to class 2 ICS-PSSH-30 17-A2 Downgraded to class 2 ICS-PSSP-3018-A2 Downgraded to class 2 ICS-PSST -3,016-A2 Downgraded to class 2 ICS-PSST-3019-A2 Downgraded to class 2 lCS-PSST -3020*A2 Downgraded to class 2 ICS-PSST-3021-A2 Downgraded to class 2 ICS-PSST-3027-A2 Downgraded to class 2

RBG-47876 Page 100 of 131,. CALCULATION CALC. NO. - REV. ADDENDUM AX-76A Rev.3E =~ ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ATTACHMENT NO.: ---~ RIVER BEND STATION JBINO.: ENTERGY 'PAGE g OF CALCULATION CHECKLIST YES NO N/A FORMAT EDP-AA-20 SECTION X_ Cover Page completed. 6.4.1 Table of Contents completed (as required). 6.4.2 X Revision History Sheet completed (as required). 6.4.3 X Revisions are identified with revision lines in right margin. 6.4.3 X Applicable Documents Page completed. 6.4.4 X Defmitions established (as required). 6.4.5 )( Calculationlrevisionladdendumlpage numbers are identified correctly. 6.4.10 CONTENTS X Previous calculation for the required analysis exists. 6.3 X Calculation'is appropriately titled for the intended scope. 6.4.1-2 X Purpose and scope are clearly and adequately established. 6.4.1-7,7.1 X ' Safety classification is correct for the identified scope. 6.4.1-6

x Topics/documeots/equipmeot for cross-reference/retrieval are identified.

6.4.1-11 X calculation is clear and comprehensible. 6.1 l( Applicable codes, standards, etc. are identified. 6.4.4-1 .'0. RBS references are identified. 6.4.4-2 X Affected documents are identified 6.4.4-3 X Inputs and sources are identified, appropriate, 'and correct. 72.2-1 ,X:. Assumptions are identified and appropriate. 72.2-2 X Inputs derived from field walkdown have been witnessed/verified 7.2.2-5 X Engineering judgments are identified and appropriate. 7.22-6 X Calculation methodology is identified and supported by technical bases. 7.2.3 X Conclusion is appropriate and is justified by calculation. 7.3 X Confirmations are, identified and indicated as required on Cover Page. 7.5.7 )( Directions for Confumations are included. 7.5.7-3 X Calculation data is appropriately included. attached. or referenced. 7.4 X Programs and software are identified and have been verified and validated. 8.0 X Methods/calculations use to check results are identified and included. X Results are accurate and in accordance with the established methodology. Certification by Professional Engineer is required. 11.7 VENDOR CALCULATIONS Calculation is perfonned in accordance with EDP-AA-25. 10.2 Calculation content and fonnat are acceptable. 10.2 Vendor, preparer. reviewer, and approver are dearly identified. 10.3 X Design verification review has been completed (as applicable). Preparer (SignaturelKCN or SSNlDate): --e~ ~A J" ,(0969) (;-(2-'1 '7 ReVieWe~%maturelK~1"~e): to. ') ~~". ~, O~4:>1 ~ - 1:2.... 9-7 U

RBG-47876 ,Page 10 r or 1_,:1'1 eENTERGY ATIACHMENTI Page 1 of 2 Typical Design Verification Record Document Number Ax - 76A METHOD f,. Verification methods to' be used: ~ Design Review Qualification Testing Alternate Calculations (LA5r-) ES-P-002-00 Page S of y Revision :36 DOCUMENT(S) REVIEWED: (Attach Additional' S~e~t(s), if needed) Document Number Revision Docwnent Title A x-7c:'A 3£ ~.~ !2..ft-e.~s b\\ rl C4l¥. SiS' ~c IC:S,)) -#t c.: Res::..c iv,- B !~- C2~C::: M ({ '16. --006'1 , l

SUMMARY

OF REVIEW: (Attach Additional S~eet(s), ~ needed) Design Verifi;"tion Completed B~~ ~ ~V Date: C::./t {g/92 7 / Comment Resolutions Accep~ D~te: Date: 11- (,)-'It Engineering SUpeMsor _)6 ~a C loS1 ) ES-P-002, Fonn No.1, Rev. 0

RBG-478~ Enclosure~ E~TERGY Page 102 off31 ( Record Revision Notice ENGMSYS AX-D7f.t;A _ ADoE: Department Document No. Page I of ~ ~ J~. 10.~. 'd-- JBIX No. ReyisionlDate FileNet Location Revision Description Change calculation I addendum status from pending to approved. Reason For Revision MR 96-0069 has been installed. RECEIVED .jUN 2 5 i999 SA. TIC Approvals: I ~~,~ / ;)'/U 1P/;;-S/9Q Originator Date ~~ci£ 06S"r 6;iJ/?7 Section Supervisor Date {

RBG-47876 Page 1030 f1e CALCULATION COVER PAGE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CALC. NO.- AX-76A Rev.3E ATTACHMENT NO.: RIVER BEND STATION JBI NO.: G13.10.2.2 ENTERGY PAGE 1 OF* q . TITLE: SUPERSEDES: N/A. stress Analysis for IC~ Piping in the Reactor Building per MR 96-0069

o...... o....... o. of. o................. ~... I.' *..... \\, o.............. o.o... ":...... o............

SUPPLEMENTS; AX-76A Rev. 3 CALCU'LATION STATUS: ~APPROVED ~~~/qq DCANCELED SYSTEM NO.: 209 . t MARK NO.: CLASSIlflCAll0N:

SAFETY RELATED I NON-SAFETY RELATED: O QAPA o NON-QAPA I

Pu,u'OSE I SCOPE I OBJECl1VE: To document the cbanges imple~ented by MR 96-0069. This MR re:.rontes the RCIC injection from the reactor vesSel bead to the feedwater nozzle. As a result of this changes. ]jn~ ICS-006-6-1 is removed and ICS-006-S7-1 is downgraded to ASME class 2 and abandoned in pIae;e. CONCLUSION: The changes implemented by Mll96-0069 are ac~ptable. The removal or line IC8-006-0-1 reduces the loads on the RPV head nozzle and the Drywell Bellows Penetration DRB*ZlJO. Likewise, the abandonment of ICS-006-S7-2 g~tly reduces the stress acting on the piping and the support loads acting on penetration DRB.... Zl30. penetration KJB*Z19, and pipe supports. Tberefore, the piping sYstems analyzed by this calculation remain within the allowables of the ASME Section III Code. REC EP.JED .JUN 2 5 1999 SA T{C SOFTWARE USED FOR CALCULATION: D YES D NO SDDF#: N/A Manufacturer: Name yersionJRelease No. CONFIRMATIONS REQUIRED: 0 YES.NO I CONFIRMATION COMPLETE: 0 YES DNO ON/A KEYwORDS: ICS, ~ 96-0009, RcrC REVIEW & APPROVAL . /"""". ~h.' \\ ~~i~. ~~>hQ,nL" ~ tPr-~6 '-/r-qt. \\ ~ elf i 11_/~-O;7 (Signature/Date ) r~~SignaturelDare) I I ~ture1Date) Preparer D viewer (Non-Safety) Supervisor Caroilo Cuadra, KCN 0969 ~ign Verification ReViewer (Printed lfame, KCN, or SSN) (Printed Name, KCN, or SSN) f2AJt;~1-I. GuPTA, (oS?

RBG-47876 Page 104 of 131 e -ENTERGY CALCULATION COVER PAGE* ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT RNER BEND STATION CALC. NO. - REV. ADDENDUM AX-76B. Rev.1H. ATTACHMENT NO.: .:f47 PAGE 1 OF~ TITLE: Pipe Stress Analysis for ICS-006-7-2 (abandoned inplace) in the .~~~~~~:~~:'~~.~~~~.t~ Auxiliary Building per MR 96-0069 SUPPLEMENTS: lP/tat1g J W CALCULATION STATUS:.. o APPROVED ~PENDING o CANCELED SYSTEM NO.: 204, 209 I MARKNO.: CLASSIF1CATION: lisAFETYRELATED I NON-SAFE:rY RELATED: OQAPA (gJ NON-QAPA I PURPOSE I SCOPE I OBJECTIVE: MR 96-0069 reroutes the RCIC Injection line from its original connection to the RPV Head to the FWS system through a short portion of the RHS piping RHS-010-65-2. The objective of this revision is to evaluate the abandoned pipe ICS-006-7-2 (downgraded from Class 1 to 2) in place. This piping has no function and it is not removed due to ALARA purpose. The piping is cut near an elbow as shown on isometric. The piping is to be evaluated for the applicable dynamic load cases only to meet Class 2 requirements. The supports, penetration, valves, and other piping components do not need evaluation because they are qualified with thermal, fluid transients, and all dynamic load cases in the previous revisions. RECEIVED JUN 1 2 1998 SD.C CONCLUSION: This analysis demonstrates that*the piping system is within acceptable design limits of AS ME Section III Code for changes implemented by MR 96-0069. SOFTWARE USED FOR CALCULATION: (gJ YES DNO SDDF#: 6229.400-100-00lA Manufacturer: Bechtel .. N~e MEIOI VersionlRelease No. N4. CONFIRMATIONS ~QlJIRED: 0 YES. ~ NO I CONFIRMATION COMPLETE: DYES DNO ~N/A KEYWORDS: pipe, stress calculation, MR 96-0069 REVIEW & APPROVAL r". (Q5~94R~o/" ~ ""t. ~~

6. !U./fJ.

left'1.5/) CrAP t\\/t/~/'-lI (SignaturelDateY i Ie:.; ate) (SignatureIDate) ~ Preparer D. ~eviewer (Non-Safety) Supervisor (Printed Name, KCN, or SSN) ~sign Verification Reviewer RajeshGupta ( 10>'1 ) Rajni R. Patel (0861) Camilo Cuadra (0969)

R8G-47876 Page 105 of 13.1 ~- ~ . ~~----------------~------~ CALCULATION CALC. NO. REV. ADDENDUM AX-76B, Rev. 1ft ~::e ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ATIACBMENTNO.: ENTERGY RIVER BEND STATION PAGE 2. OF TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE

1. Title Page.......................................................................................................................... 1

2. Table of Contents.............................................................................................................. 2

3. Revision History......................................... c...................................................................... 3

4. Applicable Documents....................................................................................................... 4. 5 Calculation Summary

5. Objective...................... ::................................................................................................... 6

6. Method.............................................................................................................................. 7

7. Conclusion........................................................................................................................ 8

8. Notes................................................................................................................................ 9

9. Assumptions..................................................................................................................... 1 0

. Design Input

10. Isometric Sketch............................................................................................................. 11

11. Basic Analytical Data...................................................................................................... 12

12. Valve Data...................... :................................................................................................ 13

13. Concentrated Weight Data.................................................. :..................... _..................... 14

14. Rel~tive Seismic Anchor Movements................,............................................................. 15. 16

15. Dynamic Loads..... :..................................................................... _...... :.............................. 17 Summary of Results

16. Maximum Stress Levels......................................................... ~........................................ 18

17. Functional Capability Evaluation................................................ _...................................... 19

18. Valve Accelerations.......................................................................................... :.............. 20. 21

19. Vent & Drain Line Qualification........................................................................................ 22

20. Sleeve Clearance Evaluation...................................................................... _................... 23 to 25 Checklists 21. Reviewer's checklist............................................................................... :......................... 26

22. Calculation Checklist.......................................................................,..................... :......... 27

23. Design Verification Record....... :................... :................................................................... 28 Attachments Attachment A.................................................................................................................. _..... A 1 to A6 Attachment B..... :................................................................................................................. 81 to 8306 TOTAL PAGES:............... 340

RBG-47876 Page 106 of 131 e ENTERGY Revision No. 2 CALCULATION CALC. NO. - REV. ADDENDUM AX-76B, Rev.IR ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AITACHMENT NO.: RIVER BEND STATION. r8..\\7.1!. j U.I." REVISION HISTORY Paragraph Description of Change No. All ICS function is added to FWS System through RHR per MR 96-0069. Rev 2 of this calculation qualifies the abandoned pipe ICS-006-7-2 from penetration Z-19 to NP 87-88 (downgraded from Class 1 to Class 2). All design input and results are documented in their appropriate section.

RBG-47876 Page 107 of 131 CALCULATION CALC. NO. - REV. ADDENDUM ~- ~------~--------~~------~ AX-76B, Rev.lH ENTERGY PAGE 4 OF APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS I. APPLICABLE CODES, STANDARDS, & REFERENCES (NON-RB~):

1.

ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section III, 1974 edition with addenda through Summer 1974.

2.

ME101 Version N4 Pipe Stress Analysis Computer Program.

3.

Piping Design and Engineering by ITT Grinnellndustrial Piping, Inc. Fifth Edition. II. RBS

REFERENCES:

1.

EDS-ME-014, *Pipe Stress Analysis and Pipe Support Design Standard".

2.

Specification No. 228.000, Rev. 1H "Piping Engineering and Design".

3.

Design Criteria No. 228.010, *Pipe Stress and Pipe Support Design Criteria" dated 6-25-84.

4.

CHOC-EMTR 605-0, "Prpcedure for Qualification of Flanged Joints for ASME til, Class 1, 2, and 3 Piping' Systems"

5.

Environmental Design Criteria S&W Document No. 215.150, Rev. 1H, Dated July 6, 1986. B. Calculation G13.18.1.S*08, Rev. 1, "Peak Spread ARS fOf Seismic Events Including, Curves with N-411-1 Damping", 7, CHOC-EMDM-81-08, *Valve Modeling Procedure" dated December 11,9181

8..

LEM-34, "Frequencies and Acceptable Accelerations for Valve Qualification"

9.

Calculation RBI-EQ-416, "Valve Mo.deling and Accepta.ble Accelerations"

10.

Line Designation Table Change Notice - LDTCN No.: 97-ICS-01

11.

PICL Change No.: AP-76-01

12.

CHOC-EMTR-B01, "Design and Installation of Seismic Small Bore Piping, Instrumentation Tubing & Supports for River Bend", dated Sept. 1980

13.

Calculation 12210 NP(C)-PX-SB-316.0, *Pipe Stress Calc. for Vent, Drain & Instrument Connections*,. dated 1fi/83.

15.

Calculation PX-334, Rev. 1 H, "1/2 SSE Structural Seismic Displacements Data and Input Procedure for Piping Analysis" dated July 18, 1984,

16.

Calculation PX-462, Rev. 0, "Structural Displacements Due to Thermal Expansion" dated April 9, 1976,

17.

DEM-1900, *Stress Analysis of Large Bqre Piping and Pipe Supports for Jet Impingement Loads", dated 12-17-84

18.

CHOG-EMDM-82-20, "Stress Intensification Factors for Reduced Outlet Branch Connections", dated 11-12-82.

RBG-47876 Page 108 of 131 ~-~----------~------~~------~ CALCULATION CALC. NO. - REV. ADDENDUM AX-76B, Rev. IH ~==~ ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. AITACHMENTNO.: ENTERGY RIVER BEND STATION PAGE 17 OF APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS II. RBS

REFERENCES:

19.

DEM-P-4335, IOC from G. MartinoJK. Basu to D. ChristodoulouJD. Bhargava, "Model of Valve 1E51*AOVF065,' dated 11-19-84.

20.

AX-76B including aU addendums ID. AFFECTED DOCUMENTS: DOC. NO. REV. DOCUMENT TITLE AF,FECT CHANGE NO. (Superseded, Revised, Initiated, DOC. etc.) SR122 OA Pipe Support Stress Report Revised

MR 96-0069 SR126 OA Pipe Support Stress Report Revised

MR 96-0069 SR127 OA Pipe Support Stress Report Revised

MR96-0069 SR128 OA Pipe Support Stress Report Revised

MR 96-0069 SR132 OA Pipe Support Stress Report Revised

MR96*0069

RBG-47876 Page 109 of 131 ~~~--~--------------~--------~ CALCULATION CALC.NO.-REV.

==~ ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AX-7GB, Rev.lB ENTERGY RIVER BEND STATION PAGE ~ OF OBJECTIVE MR 96-0069 reroutes the RCIC Injection Line from its original connection to the RPV Head to the FWS system through a short portion of the RHS piping RHS-010-65-2. Since some of the original ICS-006-7-1 piping beyond the diversion point is left in pl.ace and has been downgraded to ASME Class 2. The objective of Revision 2 of this calculation is to evaluate the abandoned piping ICS-006-7-2 from containment penetration Z-19*to the capped near elbow after the horizontal restraint PSST-2071A1 (BZ-7SAN) at NP 90 as shown on*isometric. The ICS piping was originally analyzed for thermal, fluid transients, dynamic and hydrodynamic load cases because it was connected to the containment penetration Z-19. The 'abandoned pipe in place is not functional; therefore, there is no water weight, and fluid transients associated with this piping. Only dynamic and hydrodynamic load cases are applicable to demonst~ate the structural integrity of piping is maintained for this piping. There are no support configuration change. Supports are qualified while the piping is operational. Since the piping is not going t~ experience any thermal, fluid tra.nsient loads, the original support design is adequate and no further analysis is required.

RBG-47876 Page 110 of 131 r-~~-----'-------------------------------------'r-------------------~ ENTERGY CALCULATION ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT RIVER BEND STATION METHOD OF ANALYSIS ME101 CALC. NO. - REV. AX-76B, Rev.IH PAGE 7 OF The abandoned piping in place is unsupported at free end; however, the support configuration is adequate to provide supports to maintain the structural integrity of piping during seismic and LOCA events. To demonstrate the piping system is within the ASME code requirements, the piping was analyzed by ME1 01, Version N4 using only the dynamic and hydrodynamic load cases.

RBG-47876 Page 111 of 131 ~~ ~~--------~----~ CALCULATION CALC.NO.-REV.

===~ ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AX-76B. Rev.IR ENTERGY RIVER BEND STATION PAGE 2. OF CONCLUSION The completed analysis shows that the stresses and reactions on the sUbject piping are within acceptable limits in accordance with the requirements of the AsME Section III Code. Functional capability evaluation is not performed because the piping is abandoned in place and is not functional. Stresses on vents, drains, and test connections are within acceptable limits per calculation PX-SB-316. Sleeve clearances are adequate. Penetration Z-19 loads are reduced due to deletion ofthennal and fluid transients load cases. Therefore, the previous revision loads are still valid and are acceptable. New analysis is not required.

RBG-47876 Page 112 of 131 r~~~---r-------C-A-L--C~

U-L-A-T-I-O-N--------~c~

~~c~.N-O- .--U-V- . --~

===~ ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AX-76B, Rev. In RIVER BEND STATION PAGE 9 OF ENTERGY NOTES

1.

The Coordinate system for all data expressed in the global system is defined as follows: (-X) Is plant "called north" per piping drawing

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

(y) Is vertical "up" (Z) According to right hand rule The local system for straight piping members is defined as follows: (X) Is along the axis of the pipe, positive in the direction of coding. (Y) In the plane of the local X-Axis and the global +Y-Axis unless the local X-Axis is aligned with the global V-Axis; then the local Y-Axis will be parallel to the global X-Axis. (Z) According to right hand rule. Forces and moments on restraints, supports, and equipment are those imposed by the' piping systems 0.e., actions, not reactions). Unless otherwise noted, forces and moments reported at an inline anchor represent the total forces and moments acting upon that anchor considering contributions from piping on all sides of that anchor. Reactions reported on terminal anchors are due to piping shown in this report only. For total reactions, values must be combined with those from continuation summaries. Unless otherwise indicated, stresses at intersections have assumed an unreinforced branch Connection. Intersection reimorcement requirements indicated in this AX are based on mechanical loads only. No pressure reinforcement has been calculated or considerep. The'piping'fabricator' sh,all perform these calculations, as well as area reinforce'ment requirements, and shall utilize the larger of the indicated pressure or mechanical reinforcement for fabrication. Piping support loads may be found in Attachment B pipe support summary. For lines requiring seismic analysis, the reactions reported are cyclic in character, and reactions must be considered as acting in either the positive or negative direction. The valve 1 E51*AOVF065 operator weight reduction of 40 Ib per Rev. 1 B was neglected in this revision. Abbreviations R.H---------Rod Hanger S.H--------Spring Hanger V. C.--------Vertical Restraint RX---~-------X-Restraint RZ---------~-Z-Restraint RSKew---~-Skewed Restraint SX---' -------X-Snubber SY---------Y -Snubber SZ---------Z-Snubber SSKew----Skewed Snubber EI------- ------Elevation Rdcr--- ----Reducer S.R. Elb-------Short Radius Elbow

I' I I RBG-47876 Page 113 of 131 -

===~ ENTERGY ASSUM:PTIONS None CALCULATION CALC. NO. - REV. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AX-76B. Rev. IH RIVER BEND STATION . PAGE {OOF

J-iOT~ : TI-IIS PIPE. /s

E o

u

11\\

A 8 A. t--I'l:>Q N £? l::> /,..J P L.AC~ ~ SI-\\I ElD BLOC" "'I WALL +/ '.7~@ilU @~se',oty@>4{i1@*~ ~ ANCHOR ~

." ~

HIO r.uI\\ilD RES1JWt\\T 125 )(. :0 38.~96 '( = 123'17~ ?: = -\\0 *50 SlCV'£ 41fT. Z. ~ * -- ,~1'2" ~ '3331 -- I m CO"lD.O" AX.7GA @j) ~ .. '¥'.~.- e.-" * :.".), C.ONT.AI o pa'+'LA ,,\\ " ./ PENETRATION j KJB* l 19 (TYPE 12) PSST.2093 PsI< 209~ pss T 2.094 \\ t. S1$ A,OVF 0('5 (lR) (\\Ie\\\\! 0 ~o - \\). \\ MSA ) [SJ~ P.s.s:T 2100 IR~I PSs:T :;,c:n ( A.Y<... t. *. 6~6 Nf-X 2 m 6

c

-um;:o Ql:::J(D <al g. G")

~~

~...,""" ~,lllti~~~ m 'J

u

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~trj> --~t-' =z(] ~~~ ~~f; OOtrJ~ ~~S ~~Z ~~ O~ Ztrj "tI ~ o "".S ~ ~ ~ ~ I: r':l ~ i-l z P I ~

BASIC ANALYTICAL D~TA LINE NUMBER P.ASS /-ICS i LLOWABLE E COL STRESS HATERIAL~106pSJ Sh(PSI) OUTSIDE DIA (IN.) WALl. TIlKNS (IN.)

INSULJ

' J COEFF I WT. TJ{KNS E HOT OF EXPN. TOTAL (IN.) l06pSI IN./FT. LB./FT . ' oo,~ 2-2, I? /I PENl':.~ !JOILS tyl'AX Gt.B I z 7, ~ I I ~COO /;./'2'

/gg-2001-I5tfS~CL/12~,? I J7§rx:

lI

b.'2~

zc()-<'{)q '?,Olf-208 I 2!Jl,-2/)' - '2.Is-'l25 z~-2r./) * , 2'25 -'l30' - X}O-Zg2 - 'I 1/ /' II I, SinD GR,t, I 27.? Y15'08 CL I I 29.? II II I, 7,62; /I 7.¥.O 1/ '1 jC;OfX) 1/ 17&00 3{),O '1 . 1') 2 /f'JZ //32 7,/J97 1.893 I. 'lIS, ~.l.lf ,c)7~ o ,0 '/ I, II /' /I Zi2-293I - 1-W508CLlI2.9,<>; 1/7t;oO II 32./lG" I J.~)gl 0 28')'2B~ - If If ')'1. ~§ 2,5 0 '3 /I <tIl I'f L'IIE ,~, - SfI/0'~,B <.7,'1 I>O(}O I.O!) " JS'! 0 I If ~ Llllt '){)I ~ II (( .8rO .147 D E:LI3DWS I _~ q J II /I / I," J;)I\\() n ~.!.--~ ~ ~ 27,If .0182. 2g '57 '2?,O . '~/I2. 2 <a. $ 7 'I IJ b~.~2 1/ II 14(..0.('2 27.S21*()()'J8 1:l-3G,..13 '29"'.3~ II (,1.qiP

;:'Ii!

1 18 '("5 'I II I' 1/ '27.8< I.oo>f/ Itil. '<'I I, II 9'17.7'1 7..78

()IB-l.

<~7f ~7b ,.,~ 21/ 'I I. ~/~ 2 ). J? _1,_ ~6"a "PI ... _ uC' I.. 1/ J1 __ 11~~-----1L / "-'1 J /'\\ L _ u ___ ~_~ T~; I :1, I; $ II'~ r~~1 v I " I - I ~~'7 ~

_/A-~' :,',:: :'

2:"~ -: _'. :':; ~

. JI ~t I 1'- I II' I,vw I 0 I :: I =rf"~ _-' _~r_ _II ___ ~ ~_J,- oJ _ _ra~ _ ~.: A/J c-' u , / I I I I II.' 1. 7 (0 I U I. I I~'-O 37-';~ 'I /I If II /I ,6* 0 II /I 3~. 24 }1J z: f\\J - 0 ml1 ':'; r. ":- m z~ o -i{j\\ AT 0-L.D ~z.. -.1 ~t fJl 111'" t;-i o l ~ r,- -f r (J1 ij m' II (} ~~ -u M III V\\ -f'q- ~ I 11 , ilm::::o CJ::::JOJ ~g.G> ~ en ' ~c:~ ,*I..... la~~ mil' ~ ~ 'J ~ ~ ~ Z ~ ~~~

~(")

~~S ~O> OO~~ ~~S >~~ !:j~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ l"j ~ Z rv ~ 0 e ~ ~ 1::

A ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ u ~ ~ N N N N N N N N N N cn4,JII*~N OU)CD.....,~"'.. WN O\\DCD""~tII"""N Oc.OfD OItft"""N VALVE DATA NODE NOMINAL S&W S&W VALVE NO. SIZE(IN) VALVE NO. DESCRIPTION NO. TYPE FILE NO. LENGTH (FT.) 1-10/ /// .n. ~i~ 1Jt:L" A, Ir"/'o, '2 /" "'-- n",,, " J_ 0..2. I 'c.~ \\...V ' Y -r I.. ~ ... rc.. '-r/-IAJ~ ~\\.DV7 ~~ /~.,!jC (p VCwdlo~/)~ IMS4 / 6/~AoV.co(o5 CHECK e~, ~8-0u2~aJ5F . /1 I~(p ~ ~6'2. ~ V<?W090-:4-IM~ / Ele*McJVFoet; ~L(JBE ~~.. ~//l.-0tI7-C8k- /,I(P(P !3eo 4 ~ /e/~~ v,col9. CI/ECK. ~~8. ~I/ -C#/-()DeF /. 1,&& ____ 4 II:;e~~ '2/lB..~I/-M~ , *o,zQ Y~WC80~C'-21<S <jAT£ ~ ~a58-C>IIL .514" lIes -;;.v,co&!- .334-7e5 VOSI5D-q-~ ~ 1 74S 84 VoWI50-4 -Z- ~08E C1L(J6E. e~8.tI3-o58:om:-~4 ZO/D ~ ~ ~t.:?-2M 151,*VFc>5f ea.zI3-a5B-6~ .,z1~---- ~ ~ VOW1fo-<:?-2M 15/~V~oB5 .IZCj'Z J/J/J '" B/4

VOW/6() -r:, -~t.1 I Le:5,If V 50~

.8/e5 I-BgG ~4 'leN'; '6C?- (:r~ / :£c.5* V I DO .333 .~ I-sw,... 1//\\.IIAr../:./JM

Ie J/7.Jl1. \\/C/'"V'~J

.Jl<--J ~! --~ -'\\/./7 ~ . E545 .8/4 ~r--- VOW/50-t-2M 1£'z~Y, ~ - ~~ f-" 40£0 1112. VoSO~O*B-Z leB;'213~o-v ~ ~ 'i ~R.J2 A .., f\\ II 10,1/ U,,\\/7::L A"n 171:.l ~.DE.tI -.LJt:t:h /7",/ 14f"~ -~ I~ -..., .~ - .~. V"~ O<<Om.....,cn",At,..IN_ VALVE OPERe WEIGHT (LB.) WT. (LB.) 7c:.---. a/~ 507 1"28. 5'Z5 __ ~ l---i45 B50 /0 /0 ~ -

t::::-:...

10 10 /0 ,,.... ----V-- ~ /0 (p ~ '-0 .. to I,, Co. i l ...... ~ ~O ......::tl o :E 0.. Z ~ t--- 0 ~ ~ ~~ ~~ 0 (") G'l l> r '-'::tl 0 0 C C -0 r.> -f r-- - 0 Z N 0 N > 0 ...... r 00 ITI ' , c z ~ r -f =n ' I ~ ~o 0 1> ~z -t 0 ~z z iiIO z c i'J~ :t CJl rn -f ITI

0 0

..... z

r~

~ en,.. 0 0 0 ITI -0 ~ G'l ITI II ~0l!1 ~ Iii\\. ~ "Um:;o t\\)~{ll <C Q. (j) CD 0 I ...... C/l~ ...... C-....l o)Cil~ Q.,No) W en -f o Z III to O:E >> ITI r III o ~ C ITI r

tl

>> m -i~ OZ Z~

0 (1)-

r~

fTI 0 fTlo -i ~ o

0 l>

-f o Z

RBG-47876 Page 117of131 e ENTERGY CALCULATION ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT RIVER BEND STATION CONCENTRATED WEIGHTS: Component Description Valve Body 1E51*AOVF065 Valve Operator 1 E51*AOVF065 Small Bore Support Weight Weight in Ib 307. 123. .40. Node No B50 870 188 CALC. NO. - REV. AX-76B, Rev. IR PAGE 140F

RBG-47876 Page 118 of 131 STONE & WEBSTeR ENGINEERING CORPORATION CALCULATION SHEET CALCULA TlON IDENTIFICATION NUMBER JO. OR WOo NO. DIVISION & GROUP CALCULATION NO. OPTIONAL TASK CODE 12210 NP(C) AX-76B ~E-I/. 1~ REF. DESIGN INPUT (CONT'D) RELATIVE SEISMIC ANCHOR AND/OR SUPPORT DISPLACEMENTS E ;a; saa EiI&9filNUeU 91f !pua F9&lIsm:ii6 P/i6SE5~ ~*"I SUPPORT DISPLACEMENTS ". NODE SUPT. BUILDING, ATTACHMENT (IN) NO. TYPE (STRUCTURE ) ELEVATION (FT) DX DY DZ ""r A.v')'£) At/X, &...eq, C//,719 0.2550 0.1800 ~ r-::. R";: t'....... q7,;ZS ---~ V 9 0.2750 47 f&kw ~ /04.75

~ VO.1810 0.2680 48 ISsKeW I~

~3070 ------ 0.2680 52 :5:e /~ ~-- 0.2680 V 10-'" 61 R~ /0(0.0 . ~---- 0.2720 71 $.;k~ V (/8./07 0.3620 ---~ I'-.. 0.3030 ~ ~c. /1~75 .0.1810 ~ 90 K'~ /~,75 0.3100 100 ~kEW 1-2~,5Z(P 0.3800 0.1810 121 R-c 1~,5~~ 0.3130 122 Vc /ee,6'2~ 0.1810 141 ~,~ /Z'2,5zt. 0.1810 0.3130 220 ~,~ SIIEr:J:> &.r:x5" /'2~,(;o 0.4110 0.8530 285 1..1. /,,~ ~CcNr: /;Z,z, 7~ 0.9870 0.4390 0.8690 I~ PAGE - ~ REMARKS ~/A

RBG-47876 Page 119 of 131 STONE &. WEBSTER ENGINEeRING CORPORATION CALCULA TION SHEET CALCULATION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER . JO. OR WOo NO. DIVISION &. GROUP CALCULA TlON NO. OPTIONAL TASK CODe 12210 NP(C) AX-76B RE;V. {1.4 REF. DESIGN INPUT (CONT'D) RELATIVE SEISMIC ANCHOR AND/OR SUPPORT DISPLACEMENTS (

iii CAi.grb,1'z'Uon eu ':PiH; Fer.r.OWnfe P-A<iE(S)

&6 GI SUPPORT DISPLACEMENTS

NODE SUPT.

BUILDING ATTACHMENT (IN) NO. TYPE (STRUCTURE ) ELEVATION (FT) DX DY DZ 260 Mc.HCI<, Z;fZYwe~L. 1'28,17 1.0460 0.4780 0.9310 ~ ~~ AUx, &I::e,. <98.75 0.2800 0.1800 ---./-' R~ "" 1Q?,S85 ---~~ V 375 0.2570 380 Rx ~ /65,(;71 0.30ze. ~--- 382 $1-1 /~ ~- 0.1810 410 Vc /~ ~-- 0.1810 .4v~ V /o(P,75 ~O. *1810 4"45 0.3150 0.2740 537 ~)~ V' 98.51 o~ "" 0.2520 ~ t4t~ /o3.0/(P 0.3000 0.1800 ~ 16? PAGE - ) REMARKS 0'A

RBG-47876 Page 120 of 131..

==~ ENTERGY CALCULA. TION ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT RIVER BEND STATION Dynamic Loads File Names TABLE 1 ~ALC. NO. - REV. AX-76B, Rev. iH PAGE 170F Structural Attachment Elevation (FT) Curve Number OBe SSE Auxiliary Building 114 auxbon05.ace auxbsn06.ace Auxiliary Building 141 auxbon07.ace auxbsn08.ace Drywell 114 rbdwon43.ace rbdwsn44.ace Drywell 133 rbdwon45.ace rbdwsn46.ace Shield Building 112.67 rbsbon03.ace rbsbsn04.ace Shield Building , 133 rbsbon05.ace rbsbsn06.ace TABLE 2. Structural Elevation Curve Number Attachment (ft) SRV1V SRV16V CHCO PS Drywell 121 rbdwtn43.ace rbdwan43.ace. rbdwcn43.ace rbdwpn43.ace Drywell 128 rbdwtn45.ace rbdwan45.ace rbdwcn45.ace rbdwpn45.ace Shield Building 121 rbsbtn03.ace rbsban03.ace rbsbcn03.ace rbsbpn03.ace Shield Building 128 rbsbtn05.ace rbsban05.ace rbsbcn05.ace rbsbpn05.ace

RBG-47876 Page 121 of 131 -

==~ ENTEAGY CALCULATION ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT RIVER BEND STATION MAXIMUM STRESS. LEVELS CALC. NO. - REV. AX-76B, Rev. 1ft PAGE f80F PUWG ST~SS S1.1Ml1ARX CHECK AND COVER SHEET RB/562367 (B~043) 06/11/97 BG1043 ASHE SECT. III, CLASSES 2

3

?ROJECT JOB NO. 22497 PLANT DESIGN GROUP SYSTEM !UVER BEND ?crc SYST£M PA!I.T NO'!' !N OP.:RATION CALC NO .~-76B DESIGN CONDITION SUSTAINED LO,\\llS EQN. 8 CCCASZONAL LOADS EQN. 9 OCCASIONAL LaMS EQN. 9 LEVEL B C ISO ' NO LOCATION or }!rtXlMUM END ELEMENT 134 134 134 132 lH 132 131 132 134 ~'? NO *.

MAX~~

ALLOWABLE COMPUTED COt~UTED STRE.SS STRZSS ( PSI) ( PSI) ALLal1ABLE SH 776 .052 15000 1.2 SH 3511 .195 18000 1.B SH 3793 .140 27000 OCCASIONAL LOADS EQN. S THER!~ EXPANSION EQl'l. 10 o ,1,3.4 200 132

134 192 200

. 2.4 SH 3830 .106 36000 SA 10114 22500

RBG-47876 Page 122 of 131 ENTERGY CALCULATION ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT RIVER BEND STATION FUNCTIONAL CAPABILITY EVALUATION: CALC. NO. - REV. AX-76B, Rev.lH PAGEf9 OF This abandoned pipe ICS-006-7-2 is not performing any function per MR 96-0069;.therefore, functional capability evaluation is not required.

RBG-47876 Page 123 of 131 r-~~-----'-------------------------------------'---------------------' CALC. NO. - REV. ENTERGY CALCULATION ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT RIVER BEND STATION VALVE ACCELERATIONS AX-76B, Rev. 18 PAGEZO OF Valve 1E51*AOV065.is abandoned in place and Is not perfonning any function; therefore, it is not active. Valve accelerations from this analysis are reduced due to the use of N411 damping values for all dynamic and hydrodynamic load cases. Furthermore, the fluid transients are not applicable to this piping anymore. The valve accelerations from the previous revision are provided for infonnation only.

f'

!:!~.. ~!:=~~:::::~w:;::~:::~ N N

N N OIrDQt ~~."'N o til CIt Ref: Valve Identification No. /£5/-£-AoVF~5 AX Node Pt. 1350/1970 --Z~.'2/8 I Valve Spec. No. Acceleration in Global Acceleration in Ulobal Acceptable Coordinate System at Coordinate System at 'C.G.' Acceleration (g) 'C.G.' of Operator (g) of Valve Body/a' ~8.~ifte~ n.~ _0 /1."2 o A /7J Loading Case ),,""" f-lO £>.e ~~ F}' :;!!J~,~~ ~.aI!U (g B&'o ~ 7l~7G} a. x ay az ax 8 y az ax ay 8 Z 08EI .4112 .. (p/O * . 45Z .. /87 .. 32:3 ~.24-1 -2,0 2,0 -2,0 SSEI .715 /./75.671 ,3rao

C't> '20.4(03 B,o 6,0 3,0 SRVmax (SYMA1E77<IC -/(,v) 3,777 G,G38 4,08 -2,455 3,570 '2,{P13 3,6 E,S'

3,5 Chugg /(50

-2,44/ 4-/572-

tz,47~ /.174 2, 35/

/,732-8,0 B,o 8,0 pool ?we. l! .315 .532 *::47 1:3c<P ,,~ge * .. '2~ 4,0 4,0 4,0 AP . tf'A ~ /J/!/

, /1/]/1 A.... "

Fluid Transient A '-'L_ /I hI A A,~n/ A Ll........ J'~ r, I '-' '- ' 1C,..4f- 'f-. ;.;:.;--.- .:.., IL-' "f" t:....

oJ <-'-?'

-+--' -r-' '--", ~.,-, A A tOTAL CcJA/&Np -Ur5er 4,~~ 8.1(P5 5.62/ 4,QQl 4,472. 8>.'507 5,0 -5,0 5,0 ~ ~qr;ttLOOM8JNW-FAdLiKJ:;> 4. q,z(p 'Cj,4/~ 6.&18 5,37Co o,a8o :3.95/ G,I Co,I 0,,1 6wGi ~Qe: ¢J I~~ \\{4J~ ~{f.,lliJ' £1i411f3.', . 1,,, ~ .4 !i.~ t;.'=61}J'~~e.B &e",-'~6t/,~f./J" ~ i,E.12J/)RE:JJ. e.(~i1JJ.t.ri.6 ~ r v ,Ir r~ p dPP&ClIC~L Q£. Itlll JL£ GHil1l 1LlC./J. TtI1IJ.l Ge.aae.

~ -

- ~ -- - ---- ~ ..... 0 N " NO ..... :0 o~ ? z ? 0 l2~ z-g ~ '""~ 0 80 >> r

u 0

0 c C "U r >> -I -0 Z NO N>> ..... r 0 00,.., ~~ z -I I~ " 0 ~o >>0 Olz -I 0 z 0 z z -0 c I: ]J'U CD m~

u

<0 , z . Ir ~ C/) )\\ 0 0 0 ", -0 l>> C> ",, tv - ~ . ~ ~ § o ill -um:;:o Dl::::lOJ (C(')G) <Il 0', ...... cn,j:>. NC-..I ,j:>."'oo <Il-..l 8,NO> VJ d... o Z J'1 s.- O ~ rill o ~ c", r:::V -f! 0% z::;

u

(/)z

x: CI

,..,0 ,..,g -f "U o

u

-I o Z

RBG-47876 Page 125 of 131 -

===~ , ENTERGY CALCULATION 'ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT RIVER BEND STATION VENT & DRAIN QUALIFICATION: The following Vent & Drain is qualified with generic calculation PX*SB-316. Valve No: ICS*VF302 ICS*VF100 CALC. NO. - REV. AX-76B, Rev. IH PAGE2l0F

RBG-47876 Page 126 of 131 ~~--=-~*-

~-------C--A-L-C-U--L-A~T-I-O-N----
- ----'----C-AL-c-.-N-Q---M-V-.--~

===:e ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AX-76B, Rev.IR ENTERGY RIVER BEND STATION PAGE 230F SLEEVE CLEARANCES Piping displacements due to reanalysis of Revision 2 have not changed significantly, most of them have decreased due to the deletion of thermal and fluid transients load cases, which are not applicable anymore. The Seismic Anchor Movement load case movements are not altered, and this analysis has used N411 damping values, which r~duces the dynamic displacements.

RBG-47876 Page 127 of 131 STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION CALCULA TtON SHEET i'lY CALCULATION IOENTIFICATION NUMBER rl-'~;.R~4 JO. OR WOo NO. DIVISION & GROUP CALCULATION NO. OPTIONAL TASK COCE PAGe'i205 12210 NP(C), AX-76B R/J I-i REF. SLEEVE CLEARANCE EVALUATION ) NDDE. 100 NUPIPE Output NUPIPE Input Load Case Case Pipe Deflection Penetration Sum of Relative Description No. Dir. Movement Movement Movements y ,014- -.014 Deadweight 3/ ~ -.C02 -,~~ 120 y .054 0 . OS/- Thermal (N+U) ~ .003 6 .003 ~~ Y . 118 ° . I IB Thermal (Max.) -T:

cx:l3 0

.003 28 y _ 01"5 ° ~0/5 Thermal (Min.l

c

.00'2. 0 ,CIOZ,. Building 1'I-cUfSS y

Cx::J4..

0 -0()4.. Settlement 1

2. /?liN

.:e: ' .0 C> 0 Building ~~ y -.,z72 -.~70 -,aDZ.. Settlement 2 ~RtJN e 0 0 0 S7 y ./ 9.,5 ./8/ .014-OBEA .e .014- .~/O . 00/ Y _028 SSEA (2*OBEA) '-e .00'2. 40 y .0°4 ' -0C4-OBEl -e .007 .007 Y .008 . 008 SSEI 41 -i! . 01.:3 .0/3 46 y .0,50 , ~§o Oyna!pic OCCU, .c- . 076 .075 35 y . OQO .050 Dynamic OCCE ~ .01'S . (')75 8(0 y .0-51 .051 Dynamic OCCF ~

07~

.OIG-:. Total Relative I + + Building I + + Dyanmic ~ovements DWT - TIler. - Settlement OBEA - (OCCU/OCCE ) Or I + + Building I + + Dyanmic DWT ~ Ther. - Settlealent - SSEA - (OCCI') Notes: 1. The sign ot the total relative movements 'must be the 5i~ of the maximum combination or. Deadweight, Thermal and Building Settlement.

2. The maximum of either equation shown above is recorded on the next page to be compared wi th the lIleeve clearance.

1/ C( = /-.614 +./18 +. 004/+,0"2.8 +-.O-5! =./67 iE ~ / -. ooe +.005 + 0/ +

002..;-. C>7<:C =-
07'7 "

RBG-47876 Page 128 of 131 STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERiNG CORPORATiON CALCULATION SHEET CALCULA nON IDENTIFICATION

NUMBER.

';~;.If' '2.5 JO. OR WOo NO, . DIVISiON at GROUP CALCULATION /t' I OPTIONAl. TASK coce PAGe~ 12210 NP(C) AX-76B R, H REF. SLEEVE CLEARANCE EVALUATION Sleeve Clearance Looking North

.loDE. lex: :;)

y Total Relative MI/J. Movements / ~8' ~ 'I -z -

1,~:Z5 -

.07 z * / ~8'

;.~~S:.

.CJ79 ~ z -z . 187" of:::.. y.. I'~~' -!8(~ - - y * /1%;"

/,8/e '~

. 187 ft -y

Sleeve Clearance Looking East y

-x a 0= X

0.

K -x Y = as -y * -y Sleeve Clearance Looking up Pacing North x -z

Z z

-z X til IE -x s -x Conclusion.

of::-

0

RBG-47876. Page 129 of 131 -

===~ ENTERGY Item Calc Page CALCULATION ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT RIVER BEND STATION REVIEWER'S CHECKLIST Comments AJOr1~ Conunents Provided By Conunents Resolved By I~ t.~~ 61~T

t. /11 /'f'1 Reviewer KCN Date Preparer KeN Date CALC. NO. - REV. ADDENDUM AX-76B. Rev. IH ATIACHMENT NO.:

PAGE 2~OF ResponseIResolntion Resolution Accepted Reviewer KCN Date

RBG-47876 Page 130 of 131 -

===~ ENTERGY YES NO x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x CALCULATION CALC.NO.*REV.ADDEND~ AX-76B, Rev. IH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ATTACHMENT NO.: RIVER BEND STATION PAGE 2.7 OF CALCULATION CHECKLIST N/A FORMAT EDP-AA-20 SECTION Cover Page completed. 6.4.1 x Table of Contents completed (as required). 6.4.2 Revision History Sheet completed (as required). 6.4.3 ' x Revisions are identified with revision lines in right margin. 6.4.3 Applicable Documents Page' completed. 6.4.4 x Definitions established (as required). 6.4.5 Calculation/revision/addendumlpage numbers are identified correctly. 6,4.10 CONTENTS Previous calculation for the required analysis exists. 6.3 Calculation is appropriately titled for the intended scope. 6.4.1-2 Purpose and scope are clearly and adeqUately established. 6.4.1-7, 7.1 Safety classification is correct for the identified scope. 6.4.1-6 Topics/documents/equipment for cross-reference/retrieval are identified. 6.4.1-11 Calculation is clear and comprehensible. 6.1 Applicable codes, standards, etc. are i,dentified. 6.4.4-1 RES references are identified. 6.4.4-2 Affected documents are identified 6.4.4-3 Inputs and sources are identified, appropriate, and correct., 7.2.2-1 Assumptions are identified and appropriate. 7.22-2 x Inputs derived from field walkdown have been witnessedlverified 7.2.2-5 Engineering judgments are identified and appropriate. 7.2.2-6 Calculation methodology is identified and supported by technical bases. 7.2.3 Conclusion is appropriate and is justified by calculation. 7.3 x Confirmations are identified and indicated as required on Cover Page. 7.5.7 x Directions for Confinnations are included. 7.5.7-3 Calculation data is appropriately included, attached, or referenc~. 7.4 x Programs and software are identified and have been verified and validated. 8.0 Methods/calculations use to check results are identified and included. Results are accurate and in accordance with the established methodology. x Certification by Professional Engineer is required. 11.7 VENDOR CALCULATIONS x Calculation is perfonned in accordance with EDP-AA-25. 10.2 x Calculation content and fonnat are acceptable. 10.2 x Vendor, preparer, reviewer, and approver are clearly identified. 10.3 Design verification review has been completed (as applicable). Preparer (SignatureIKCN or SSNlDat~ " , ~GlM! ~~'"I) (,11g./~7 -:;;~., /1-Reviewer (SignatureIKCN or SSNlDate)~ ~ ~ (0901'),6/tf/97

RBG-47876 Page 131 rnrr':I:C::-----r----C-A-L-C-U-LA-T-I-O-N-----r--::-~-:-:---------, ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT RIVER BEND STATION ENTERGY Design Verification Record Document No. AX-76B, Rev. IH METHOD Verification methods t9 be used: X Design R~view _ _ ___ Qualification Testing Alternate Calculations DOCUMENT(S) Document No. Revision Document Title AX-76B IH Pipe Stress Analysis for ICS-006-7-2 "...... ~---"-"------ SUl\\1MARY OF REVIEW: Acceptable as is. Design Verification Compl~ted By ~ c: ¢.du c Comments Resolution Accepted By _.....:.tJ--</, c...!A--I-_______ _ &gmoering Sup"';,., @ll-, C-ry:!? Date Date ll_/~-CH TABLE 1}}

v t e Letter Sequence Request
EPID:L-2018-LLA-0029, Request for Review and Approval of Relocation of the Reactor Core Isolation Cooling (RCIC) Injection Point from the Reactor Vessel Head Spray Nozzle to the 'A' Feedwater Line Via the 'A' Residual Heat Removal (RHR) Shutdown Cooling (Approved, Closed)
Initiation Request, Request Acceptance... Supplement, Supplement Administration Questions 24 May 2018 Answers Results Approval Other: ML18058A407
MONTHYEAR2018-02-26 [Table View]

RBG-47876, Response to License Amendment Request (LAR) for Review and Approval of Relocation of the Reactor Core Isolation Cooling (RCIC) Injection Point NRC Request for Additional Information (RAI)

Text

SUBJECT:

References:

Dear Sir or Madam:

Background

REFERENCES:

SUMMARY

REFERENCES:

REFERENCES:

SUBJECT:

SUBJECT:

SUBJECT:

SUBJECT:

SUBJECT:

SUBJECT:

SUBJECT:

SUMMARY

Title:

SUMMARY

=

Title:

REFERENCES:

SUMMARY

REFERENCES:

REFERENCES:

Navigation menu

RBG-47876, Response to License Amendment Request (LAR) for Review and Approval of Relocation of the Reactor Core Isolation Cooling (RCIC) Injection Point NRC Request for Additional Information (RAI)

Text

SUBJECT:

References:

Dear Sir or Madam:

Background

REFERENCES:

SUMMARY

REFERENCES:

REFERENCES:

SUBJECT:

SUBJECT:

SUBJECT:

SUBJECT:

SUBJECT:

SUBJECT:

SUBJECT:

SUMMARY

Title:

SUMMARY

=

Title:

REFERENCES:

SUMMARY

REFERENCES:

REFERENCES:

Navigation menu

Search