ML18153D196

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Violation from Util .Violation Noted: Individual Used Marijuana as Evidenced by Confirmed Positive Urinalysis Test for Drug
ML18153D196
Person / Time
Site: Surry  
Issue date: 11/23/1992
From:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML18153D195 List:
References
EA-92-197, NUDOCS 9212170089
Download: ML18153D196 (1)


Text

,i Tony V. Hollenbeck HOME ADDRESS DELETED UNDER 10 CFR 2.790 e

NOTICE OF VIOLATION Docket No. 55-20096 License No. OP-20445-1 EA 92-197 As a result of a letter received from Virginia Electric and Power Company's Surry Power Station dated October 30, 1992, a violation of NRC requirements was identified.

In accordance with the "General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C, the violation is listed below:

10 CFR 55.53(j) prohibits the use of marijuana by licensed operators.

Contrary to the above, the licensee violated 10 CFR 55.53(j) in that the licensee used marijuana as evidenced by a confirmed positive urinalysis test for that drug performed on September 24, 1992.

This is a Severity level III violation (Supplement VII).

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Mr. Tony V. Hollenbeck is hereby required to submit a written statement of explanation to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN:

Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C. 20555, with a copy to the Regional Admin.istrator, Region II, and a copy to the NRC Resident Inspector at Surry Power Station within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice of Viblation (Notice). This reply should be clearly marked as a "Reply to a Notice of Violation* arid should include for

  • each violation:

(1) the reason for the violation, or, if contested, the basis for disputing the violation, (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved, (3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and. (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved.

If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an order or a Demand for Information may ~e issued to show cause why the

. license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked, or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken.

Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.

Under the authority of Section 182 of the Act, 42 U.S.C. 2232, this response shall be submitted under oath or affirmation.

Dated at Atlanta, Georgia, this1:J~day of November 1992 9212170089 921123 PDR ADOCK 05000280 Q

PDR.,.