ML18153B722
| ML18153B722 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Surry  |
| Issue date: | 05/12/1989 |
| From: | Dan Collins NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18152A484 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-280-89-09, 50-280-89-9, 50-281-89-09, 50-281-89-9, NUDOCS 8905220040 | |
| Download: ML18153B722 (2) | |
Text
.,
ENCLOSURE 1 NOTICE OF VIOLATION Virginia Electric and Power Company Surry Docket Nos. 50-280 and 50-281 License Nos. DPR-32 and DPR-37 During the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) inspection conducted on April 3-7, 1989, a violation of NRC requirements was identified.
In accordance with the."General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions,"
10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1989), the violation is listed below:
10 CFR 50, Appendix E (IV) requires that the applicant 1 s emergency plans shall contain information needed to demonstrate compliance with the elements set forth below, i.e.,... activation of emergency organization, notification procedures, etc.
Table 5.1 of the Emergency Plan titled Minimum Shift Manning Requirements lists the major Functional areas, Major Tasks, Position Title, and approximate response times for Emergency Personnel to augment on shift personnel.
Contrary to the above, based on results from the annual exercise (November 1988), quarterly call-out drill (January 1989), and a remedial exercise (February 1989) that included as an objective the demonstration of augumentati on capability, the licensee did not meet augmentation staffing requirements within the times set forth in Table 5.1 of the Surry Emergency Plan.
This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement VIII)
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Virginia Power is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN:
Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555, with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region II, and a copy to the NRC Resident Inspector, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice.
This reply should be clearly marked as a "Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include:
(1) admission or denial of the violation, (2) the reason for the violation if admitted, (3) the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved, ( 4) the corrective steps which wi 11 be taken to avoid further violations, and (5) the date when full compliance will be achieved.
Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.
If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an order may be issued to show cause why the license should not
- 3*~10522004()
F'DR ADOCk
(.I
Virginia Electric and Power Company Surry 2
Docket Nos. 50-280, 50-281 License Nos. DPR-32, DPR-37 be modified, suspended, or revoked or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken.
Dated at Atlanta, Georgia this 11.,.""-day of M(
1989.
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
~
Douglas M. Collins, Chief
/J-Emergency Preparedness and Radiological Protection Branch Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards