ML18153B038
| ML18153B038 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Surry |
| Issue date: | 07/31/1994 |
| From: | Mason D, Ohanlon J, Olsen C VIRGINIA POWER (VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO.) |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| 94-462, NUDOCS 9408190196 | |
| Download: ML18153B038 (17) | |
Text
e e
VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23261 August 10, 1994 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention: Document Control Desk Washington, D. C. 20555 Gentlemen:
VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY SURRY POWER STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT Serial No.
NO/RPC:vlh Docket Nos.
License Nos.94-462 50-280 50-281 DPR-32 DPR-37 Enclosed is the Monthly Operating Report for Surry Power Station Units 1 and 2 for the month of July 1994.
Very truly yours,
<;)w~Y~
fames P. O'Hanlon Senior Vice President - Nuclear Enclosure cc:
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II 101 Marietta Street, N. W.
Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Mr. M. W. Branch NRC Senior Resident Inspector Surry Power Station 9408190196 940731 PDR ADOCK 05000280 R
e VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY SURRY POWER STATION MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT REPORT No. 94-07 Approved:
?riManager
TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 41urry Monthly Operating Report No. 94-07 Page 2of 16 Page Operating Data Report - Unit No. 1..............................*.......................................................................... 3 Operating Data Report - Unit No. 2......................................................................................................... 4 Unit Shutdowns and Power Reductions - Unit No. 1.................................................................................... 5 Unit Shutdowns and Power Reductions - Unit No. 2.................................................................................... 6 Average Daily Unit Power Level - Unit No. 1.............................................................................................. 7 Average Daily Unit Power Level - Unit No. 2.............................................................................................. 8 Summary of Operating Experience - Unit No. 1......................................................................................... 9 Summary of Operating Experience - Unit No. 2......................................................................................... 9 Facility Changes That Did Not Require NRC Approval............................................................................... 1 O Procedure or Method of Operation Changes That Did Not Require NRC Approval........................................... 12 Tests and Experiments That Did Not Require NRC Approval...................................................................... 13 Chemistry Report............................................................................................................................. 14 Fuel Handling - Unit No. 1................................................................................................................... 15 Fuel Handling - Unit No. 2................................................................................................................... 15 Description of Periodic Test(s) Which Were Not Completed Within the Time Limits Specified in Technical Specifications................................................................................................... 16
eurry Monthly Operating Report No. 94-07 Page 3 of 16 OPERATING DATA REPORT Docket No.:
Date:
Completed By:
50-280 08-02-94 D. Mason Telephone:
(804) 365-2459 1. Unit Name:...................................................
- 2. Reporting Period:..........................................
- 3. Licensed Thermal Power (MWt):.......................
- 4. Nameplate Rating (Gross MWe):.......................
- 5. Design Electrical Rating (Net MWe):..................
- 6.
Maximum Dependable Capacity (Gross MWe):....
- 7. Maximum Dependable Capacity (Net MWe):........
Surry Unit 1 July, 1994 2441 847.5 788 820 781
- 8. If Changes Occur in Capacity Ratings (Items Number 3 Through 7) Since Last Report, Give Reasons:
- 9. Power Level To Which Restricted, If Any (Net MWe):
- 10. Reasons For Restrictions, If Any:
- 11. Hours In Reporting Period..........................
- 12. Number of Hours Reactor Was Critical..........
- 13. Reactor Reserve Shutdown Hours...............
- 14. Hours Generator On-Line...........................
- 15. Unit Reserve Shutdown Hours.....................
- 16. Gross Thermal Energy Generated (MWH)......
- 17. Gross Electrical Energy Generated (MWH)....
- 18. Net Electrical Energy Generated (MWH)........
- 19. Unit Service Factor...................................
- 20. Unit Availability Factor...............................
- 21.
Unit Capacity Factor (Using MDC Net)...........
- 22. Unit Capacity Factor (Using DER Net)...........
- 23. Unit Forced Outage Rate............................
This Month 744.0 744.0 0
744.0 0
1815928.2 596590.0 573964.0 100.0%
100.0%
98.8%
97.9%
0.0%
YTD 5087.0 3585.7 0
3548.5 0
8067530.7 2687640.0 2583168.0 69.8%
69.8%
65.0%
64.4%
0.7%
Cumulative 189407.0 127392.9 3774.5 125227.5 3736.2 291235275.8 95227188.0 90410269.0 66.1%
68.1%
61.5%
60.6%
17.0%
- 24. Shutdowns Scheduled Over Next 6 Months (Type, Date, and Duration of Each):
None
- 25. If Shut Down at End of Report Period, Estimated Date of Start-up:
- 26. Unit In Test Status (Prior to Commercial Operation):
FORECAST INITIAL CRITICALITY INITIAL ELECTRICITY COMMERCIAL OPERATION ACHIEVED
.urry Monthly Operating Report No. 94-07 Page 4of 16 OPERATING DATA REPORT Docket No.:
Date:
Completed By:
50-281 08-02-94 D. Mason Telephone:
(804) 365-2459 1. Unit Name:...................................................
- 2.
Reporting Period:..........................................
- 3.
Licensed Thermal Power (MWt):.......................
- 4.
Nameplate Rating (Gross MWe):.......................
- 5. Design Electrical Rating (Net MWe):..................
- 6.
Maximum Dependable Capacity (Gross MWe):....
- 7.
Maximum Dependable Capacity (Net MWe):........
Surry Unit 2 July, 1994 2441 847.5 788 820 781
- 8. If Changes Occur in Capacity Ratings (Items Number 3 Through 7) Since Last Report, Give Reasons:
- 9. Power Level To Which Restricted, If Any (Net MWe):
- 10. Reasons For Restrictions, If Any:
This Month YID Cumulative
- 11. Hours In Reporting Period..........................
744.0 5087.0 186287.0
- 12. Number of Hours Reactor Was Critical..........
744.0 4588.2 124664.5
- 13. Reactor Reserve Shutdown Hours...............
0 0
328.1
- 14. Hours Generator On-Line...........................
744.0 4578.5 122794.1
- 15. Unit Reserve Shutdown Hours.....................
0 0
0
- 16. Gross Thermal Energy Generated (MWH)......
1815518.1 10646074.6 286321817.0
- 17. Gross Electrical Energy Generated (MWH)....
594345.0 3547050.0 93492674.0
- 18. Net Electrical Energy Generated (MWH)........
572150.0 3416030.0 88748100.0
- 19. Unit Service Factor...................................
100.0%
90.0%
65.9%
- 20. Unit Availability Factor...............................
100.0%
90.0%
65.9%
- 21.
Unit Capacity Factor (Using MDC Net)...........
98.5%
86.0%
61.1%
- 22. Unit Capacity Factor (Using DER Net)...........
97.6%
85.2%
60.5%
- 23.
Unit Forced Outage Rate............................
0%
0%
13.7%
- 24. Shutdowns Scheduled Over Next 6 Months (Type, Date, and Duration of Each):
None
- 25. If Shut Down at End of Report Period, Estimated Date of Start-up:
- 26. Unit In Test Status (Prior to Commercial Operation):
FORECAST INITIAL CRITICALITY ACHIEVED INITIAL ELECTRICITY COMMERCIAL OPERATION
aurry Monthly Operating Report No. 94-07 Page Sot 16 UNIT SHUTDOWN AND POWER REDUCTION (EQUAL To OR GREATER THAN 20%)
REPORT MONTH: July, 1994 (1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
Method Docket No.: 50-280 Unit Name: Surry Unit 1 Date: 08-03-94 Completed by: Craig Olsen Telephone:
(804) 365-2155 Duration of LER System Component Cause & Corrective Action to Date Type Hours Reason Shutting No.
Code Code Prevent Recurrence (1)
F:
Forced S: Scheduled (4)
(2)
REASON:
Down Rx None During the Reporting Period A -
Equipment Failure (Explain)
B Maintenance or Test C
Refueling D
Regulatory Restriction E
Operator Training & Licensing Examination F
Administrative G
Operational Error (Explain)
Exhibit G - Instructions for Preparation of Data Entry Sheets for Licensee Event Report (LER) File (NU REG 0161)
(3)
METHOD:
1 -
Manual 2 -
Manual Scram.
3 -
Automatic Scram.
4 -
Other (Explain)
(5)
Exhibit 1 - Same Source.
(1)
.urry Monthly Operating Report No. 94-07 Page 6 of 16 UNIT SHUTDOWN AND POWER REDUCTION (EQUAL To OR GREATER THAN 20%)
REPORT MONTH: July, 1994 (2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
Docket No.: 50-281 Unit Name: Surry Unit 2 Date: 08-03-94 Completed by: Craig Olsen Telephone:
(804) 365-2155 Duration Method of Reason Shutting Down Rx LER No.
System Component Cause & Corrective Action to Date Type Hours Code Code Prevent Recurrence (1)
F:
Forced S: Scheduled (4)
(2)
REASON:
None During the Reporting Period A -. Equipment Failure (Explain)
B Maintenance or Test C
Refueling D
Regulatory Restriction E
Operator Training & Licensing Examination F
Administrative G
Operational Error (Explain)
Exhibit G - Instructions for Preparation of Data Entry Sheets for Licensee Event Report (LER) File (NUREG 0161)
(3)
METHOD:
1 -
Manual 2 -
Manual Scram.
3 -
Automatic Scram.
4 -
Other (Explain)
(5)
Exhibit 1 - Same Source.
MONTH:
July, 1994 Day 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 INSTRUCTIONS
.urry Monthly Operating Report No. 94-07 Page ?of 16 AVERAGE DAILY UNIT POWER LEVEL Average Daily Power Level (MWe-Net)
Day 779 17 777 18 776 19 776 20 772 21 770 22 772 23 770 24 770 25 770 26 771 27 772 28 772 29 770 30 770 31 769 Docket No.: 50-280 Unit Name: Surry Unit 1 Date: 08-02-94 Completed by: Pat Kessler Telephone: 365-2790 Average Daily Power Level (MWe-Net) 767 767 769 768 768 770 772 771 771 773 772 772 774 773 773 On this format, list the average daily unit power level in MWe - Net for each day in the reporting month. Compute to the nearest whole megawatt.
J
MONTH:
July, 1994 Day 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 INSTRUCTIONS
.urry Monthly Operating Report No. 94-07 Page 8 of 16 AVERAGE DAILY UNIT POWER LEVEL Average Daily Power Level (MWe-Net)
Day 777 17 776 18 775 19 775 20 774 21 769 22 772 23 767 24 771 25 770 26 771 27 772 28 770 29 770 30 769 31 768 Docket No.: 50-281 Unit Name: Surry Unit 2 Date: 08-02-94 Completed by: Pat l(essler Telephone: 365-2790 Average Daily Power Level (MWe-Net) 767 766 767 766 760 767 768 768 767 768 766 764 768 769 766 On this format, list the average daily unit power level in MWe - Net for each day in the reporting month. Compute to the nearest whole megawatt.
aurry Monthly Operating Report No. 94-07 Page 9 of 16
SUMMARY
OF OPERATING EXPERIENCE MONTH/YEAR: July, 1994 The following chronological sequence by unit is a summary of operating experiences for this month which required load reductions or resulted in significant non-load related incidents.
UNIT ONE:
07/01/94 07/31/94 UNIT Two:
07/01/94 07/31/94 0000 The reporting period began with the unit operating at 100% power, 815 MWe 2400 The reporting period ended with the unit operating at 100% power, 820 MWe 0000 The reporting period began with the unit operating at 100% power, 815 MWe 2400 The reporting period ended with the unit operating at 100% power, 815 MWe
TM S1-94-33 WO 294429/01 WO 294755/01 FACILITY CHANGES THAT DID NOT REQUIRE NRC APPROVAL MONTH/YEAR: July, 1994 Temporary Modification (Safety Evaluation No.94-137)
.urry Monthly Operating Report No. 94-07 Page 10 of 16 07-08-94 Temporary Modification (TM) S1-94-33 installed a mechanical jumper from the Unit 2 Fish Screens (FS) System at the Low Level Intake Structure to the Unit 1 FS System spray to provide an alternate water supply while Unit 1 repairs are being implemented. The FS System uses a low pressure spray of water to efficiently remove fish from the traveling screens at the circulating water pumps.
The Unit 2 FS System pump is capable of supplying an adequate flow to both units. The TM did not negatively impact the operation of the FS System. No safety-related functions or accidents analyses were affected and the margin of safety, as defined by the Technical Specifications, was not reduced. Therefore, an unreviewed safety question does not exist.
Work Order 07-08-94 (Safety Evaluation No.94-136)
Work Order 294429/01 performed an on-line temporary leak-seal repair of Unit 2 steam generator blowdown valve, 2-BD-3. The repair was implemented in accordance with Mechanical Corrective Maintenance procedure O-MCM-1918-01, "On-Line Leak Repairs."
The subject valve, which is normally closed, was sealed in the closed position. The leak-seal repair did not affect the structural integrity of the valve or the operation of blowdown system. Therefore, an unreviewed safety question does not exist.
Work Order 07-14-94 (Safety Evaluation No.94-140)
Work Order 294755/01 performed an on-line temporary leak-seal repair of Unit 2 steam generator blowdown valve, 2-BD-52. The repair was implemented in accordance with Mechanical Corrective Maintenance procedure O-MCM-1918-01, "On-Line leak Repairs."
The subject valve, which is normally closed, was sealed in the closed position. The leak-seal repair did not affect the structural integrity of the valve or the operation of blowdown system. Therefore, an unreviewed safety question does not exist.
TM S2-94-08, Revision 2 Temporary Modification (Safety Evaluation No.94-135) 07-20-94 Temporary Modification (TM) S2-94-08, Revision 2 implemented the injection of ethanolamine (ETA) on a trial basis to help control secondary system pH and corrosion.
The TM involves only a change to secondary system water treatment and is expected to result in reduced corrosion. A review of secondary system materials confirmed their compatibility with ETA.
The change does not impact the steam generator thermal hydraulic analyses, operating parameters, design transients, or analyses of postulated accident conditions. Therefore, an unreviewed safety question does not exist.
TM S2-94-12 aurry Monthly Operating Report No. 94-07 Page 11 of 16 FACILITY CHANGES THAT DID NOT REQUIRE NRC APPROVAL MONTH/YEAR: July, 1994 Temporary Modification (Safety Evaluation No.94-143) 07-25-94 Temporary Modification (TM) S2-94-12 bypassed failed switchyard circuit breaker 53102 to restore the 500 KV switchyard to its original (less breaker 53102) ring bus configuration until the next Unit 2 refueling outage.
The TM does not negatively impact the operation of safety-related systems or prevent systems from performing accident mitigation functions. The margin of safety, as defined by the Technical Specifications, was not reduced. Therefore, an unreviewed safety question does not exist.
1 [2]-EPT-1804-01 1 [2]-EPT-1804-02 1 [2]-EPT-1804-03 1 [2]-EPT-1804-04 1 [2]-0PT-CT-1 02
.urry Monthly Operating Report No. 94-07 Page 12 of 16 PROCEDURE OR METHOD OF OPERATION CHANGES THAT DID NOT REQUIRE NRC APPROVAL MONTHNEAR: July, 1994 Electrical Periodic Test Procedures (Safety Evaluation No.94-139) 07-13-94 Electrical Periodic Test Procedures, 1 [2]-EPT-1804-01, "Bus 1 A[2A] Undervoltage Protective Relay Testing", 1 [2]-EPT-1804-02, "Bus 18[28] Undervoltage Protective Relay Testing", 1[2]-EPT-1804-03, "Bus 1C[2C] Undervoltage Protective Relay Testing", and 1[2]-EPT-1804-04, "KF Underfrequency Protective Relay Testing for Bus 1A[2A], 18[28],
and 1 C[2C]", were developed to provide instructions for lifting electrical leads and installing electrical jumpers to facilitate testing of the normal station service bus undervoltage and underfrequency protective relays.
These upgraded procedures will be performed with the applicable unit at cold shutdown.
The performance of the subject procedures will not affect the operation of safety-related systems and will not reduce the margin of safety, as defined by the Technical Specifications. Therefore, an unreviewed safety question does not exist.
Operations Periodic Test Procedures (Safety Evaluation No.94-145) 07-27-94 Operations Periodic Test Procedures, 1[2]-0PT-CT-102, "Preparation, Alignment, and Restoration for Type A Test", were revised to provide instructions for the installation of temporary modifications to defeat Hi Hi Consequence Limiting Safeguards (CLS) and Emergency Safeguards Safety Injection (SI) (Hi CLS only) circuitry trains "A" and "8" to prevent an inadvertent engineered safeguards features actuation during the performance of containment integrated leak rate testing, performed pursuant to 1 O CFR 50, Appendix J.
The procedures will be performed with the applicable unit at cold shutdown, when the SI/CLS automatic actuation is not required. Double verification is required to ensure the affected equipment and controls are returned to their normal configuration following the testing. Therefore, an unreviewed safety question does not exist.
.urry Monthly Operating Report No. 94-07 Page 13 of 16 TESTS AND EXPERIMENTS THAT DID NOT REQUIRE NRC APPROVAL MONTH/YEAR: July, 1994 None During the Reporting Period
Primarv Coolant Analvsis Gross Radioactivity, µCi/ml Suspended Solids, ppm Gross Tritium, µCi/ml 1131, uCi/ml 113111133 Hvdrogen, cc/kg Lithium, com Boron - 10, com*
Oxygen, (DO), ppm Chloride, ppm pH at 25 degree Celsius Boron - 1 O = Total Boron x 0.196 Comments:
None CHEMISTRY REPORT MONTH/YEAR: July, 1994 Unit No. 1 Max.
Min.
Avg.
3.22E-1 2.29E-1 2.73E-1
<0.1
<0.1
,:;;,0.1 3.12E-1 3.02E-1 3.05E-1 4.22E-4 2.95E-4 3.61E-4 0.07 0.06 0.06 41.9 30.5 36.4 2.32 2.08 2.18 198.5 185.2 191.6
,:;;,0.005
,:;;,0.005
,:;;,0.005
<0.050 0.003 0.006 6.78 6.48 6.68
.urry Monthly Operating Report No. 94-07 Page 14 of 16 Unit No. 2 Max.
Min.
Avg.
2.02E-1 9.27E-2 1.41 E-1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1 1.89E-1 8.37E-2 1.40E-1 1.63E-4 7.18E-5 1.30E-4 0.10 0.06 0.08 45.8 27.6 36.0 2.34 2.07 2.20 119.8 99.6 109.1
.s_0.005
.s_0.005
,:;;,0.005
<0.050
,:;;,0.001 0.004 7.12 6.80 6.97
New or Spent Fuel Shipment Date Stored or Number Received FUEL HANDLING UNITS 1 & 2 MONTH/YEAR: July, 1994 Number of Assemblies per Shipment Assembly Number ANSI Number
-urry Monthly Operating Report No. 94-07 Page 15 of 16 Initial Enrichment New or Spent Fuel Shipping Cask Activity No Fuel Received or Stored During the Reporting Period.
-Surry Monthly Operating Report No. 94-07 Page 16 of 16 DESCRIPTION OF PERIODIC TEST(S) WHICH WERE NOT COMPLETED WITHIN! THE TIME LIMITS SPECIFIED IN TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS MONTH/YEAR: July, 1994 None During the Reporting Period.