ML18152A381
| ML18152A381 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Surry  |
| Issue date: | 12/05/1988 |
| From: | Rankin W, Sartor W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18152A382 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-280-88-43, 50-281-88-43, NUDOCS 8812190263 | |
| Download: ML18152A381 (16) | |
See also: IR 05000280/1988043
Text
A
UNITED STATES
N.EAR REGULATORY COMMiSSION
REG.ION II
101 MARIETTA STREET, N.W.
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30323
Report Nos.:
50-280/88-43 and 50-281/88-43
Licensee: Nirginia Electric and Power Company
Glen Allen, VA
23060
e
Docket No~.:
50-280 and 50-281
License No*s.: DPR-32 and DPR-37
Facility Name:
Surry 1 and 2
Inspection Conducted:
Inspector:~~
W. M. Sartor, Jr.
Team Member:
B. Haagensen (PNL)
Approved by: .J...J.J~ ((~
W. H. Rankin, Acting Section Chief
Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards
SUMMARY
,,. Is Le,
Dat'e 3igned
Scope: fhis routine, announced inspection involved observation and evaluation
of the annual emergency preparedness exercise and its associated critique, and
followup on open items.
The inspection was conducted by two NRC
representatives observing key locati ans and functions during the exercise.
This was a partial participation off-hours drill.
Results:
One significant exercise weakness was identified for failure to
recognize.and classify a Site Area Emerg~ncy.
The licensee committed to redo
the exercise on or about March 1, 1989;
4
~HJ21X8ac6K3 881207
G
05000280
PNU
-., ..
- .** ;. ,,._,.--**~: .
. * .. *.
.
.
.
.
-
.
,.*
._-
.
.
-
- .-
- \\
.*.
'.
-
.
-.
.. ,,
'*
'
~
I ,
,.
1.
Persons Contacted
Licensee Employees
REPORT DETAILS
- R. Beckwith, Emergency Planning Corporate
- D. Bensen, Station Manager
- S. Burgold, Advisory Operations
- W. Cartwright, Vice President, Nuclear
- J.* Costello, Emergency Preparedness Coordinator
- A. Friedman, Superintendent, Nuclear Training
- E. Grecheck, Assistant Station Manager
- S. Harrison, Corporate Emergency Planner
- G. Miller, Licensing Coordinator
- H. Miller, Assistant Station Manager.
- J. Price, Quality Assurance Manager
- S. Sarver, Supervisor, Health Physics
- E. Schnell, Corporate Health Physics
- W. Stewart, Senior Vice President
- J. Sukosky, Health Physicist
Other licensee employees contacted during this inspection included
eng.ineers, operators, mechanics, security force members, technicians, and
administrative personnel.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
- N. Economos, Region II
- W. Holland, Senior Resident Inspector
- L. Nicholson, ~esident Inspector
- Attended exit interview
..
2.
Exercise Scenario (82301)
The scenario for the emergency exercise was reviewed to determine that
provisions had been made to test the licensee's integrated capability as
well as a major portion of the basic elements existing within the
licensee's
Emergency
Plan
and
organization
as
required
by
10 CFR 50.47(b)(l4), 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Paragraph IV.F and specific
criteria in NUREG-0654,Section II.N.
The scenario was revfewed in advance of the scheduled exercise date.
The
licensee indicated that the exercise scenario was less challenging than
what is expected on the basis that it was primarily developed to support
the Emergency Response Facilities (ERF) Appraisal.
The ERF Appraisal had
been scheduled for this year but was cancelled by NRC a few weeks before
the annual exercise.
- '"'
,,
I
. ,
3.
2
No violations or deviations were identified.
Assignment Of Responsibility (82301)
This area was observed to assure that primary responsi bil iti es for
emergency response by the licensee were specifically established and that
adequate staff was available to respond to an emergency pursuant to
10 CFR 50.47(b)(l), Paragraph IV.A of Appendix E to 10 CFR 50, and
specific criteria in.NUREG-0654,Section II.A.
The inspector observed that specific emergency assignments were made upon
declaration of an emergency classification and that there was adequate
staff available for the initial response.
No violations or deviations were identified.
4.
Onsite Emergency Organization (82301)
The licensee's onsite emergency organization was observed to assure that
the
following
requirements
were
implemented
pursuant
to
10 CFR 50.47(b)(2), Paragraph IV .A of Appendix E to 10 CFR 50, and
specific cri teri.a defined in Section I I. B of NUREG-0654, Revision 1:
(1) re*sponsi bi l iti es
for . emergency were
unambiguously
defined;
(2) adequate staffing was provided to assure initial faGility accident
response in key furictional areas at all times; and (3) onsite and offsite
support organizational interactions were specified.
The inspector observed portions of the activation, staffing, and operation
of the Control Room, Technical Support Center (TSC), Operations Support
Center (OSC), and the Local Emergency Operations Facility (LEOF).
The
inspector noted that al thou_gh some key personnel were present in the TSC
and LEOF, the actual activation of these facilities wasn't until
approximately 90 minutes after the alert for the TSC and approximately one
additional hour for the LEOF.
The licensee identified these excessive
times to activate as a deficiency-requiring c-0rrective action.
No violations or deviations were identified *.
5.
Emergency Response Support and Resources (82301)
-*~
'*
This area was observed to ensure that arrangements for requesting and
,
effectively using assistance resources had been made, that the arrangements
\\!
to accommodate State and local staff at the licensee's near-site Emergency
Operations Facility (EOF) had been made, and that other organizations
capable of augmenting* the planned response have been identified as
required by 10 CFR 50.47(b)(3), 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Paragraph IV.A, and
specific criteria in NUREG-0654,Section II.C *
State emergency response personnel were accommodated at the LEOF.
The
inspector noted that according to the Letters of Agreement found in the
- -. -~--*.. ** .. ---**. **---
--
-
-~---
-*
- . -.
. **. ~. .
. ... ~.
'
.
. .
-*. *-
..
- .*:11~. -:.: **::::.' ... -._.
-
. .
.
,'
e
e
3
Emergency Plan, the licensee had made arrangements for requesting offsite
support to assist in an emergency.
No violations or deviations were identified.*
6.
Emergency Classification System (82301)
This area was observed to verify that a standard emergency classification
and action level scheme was in use by the nuclear facility licensee as
required by 10 CFR 50.47(b)(4), 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Paragraph IV.C, and
specific criteria in NUREG-0654,Section II.D.
An inspector observed that the emergency classification system was in
effect as, stated in the Radiological Emergency Plan (REP) and in the
Implementing Procedures.
The system appeared to be adequate for the
classification of the simulated accident, however, it was not adequately
demonstrated during this exercise (See Paragraph 11).
No violations or deviations were identified.
7.
Notification Methods And Procedures (82301)
This area was observed to determine that procedures had been established
by the licensee for notification of State and local response
organi zati ans, licensee emergency **personnel , and that the content of
i ni4:i al and fo 11 owup messages to response organizations had been
established; and the means to provide early notification to the populace
within the plume exposure pathway had been established as required by
10 CFR 50.47(b)(5), 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Paragraph IV.D, and specific
criteria in NUREG-0654,Section II.E.
An inspector observed that notification methods and procedures had been
established and were available for use in providing information concerning
the simulated emergency conditions to federal, State and local response
organizations and to alert the lice*nsee's augmented emergency response
organization.
Initial notifications were made promptly and update
messages were provided according to procedure.
However, the inspector
noted that the update messages were not accurate regarding the
radiological release.
Specifically, the simulated release began at 0400
and the TSC had been briefed on the *release at 0402.
The update message
at 0407 from the TSC indicated that no release was in progress. The update
message at 0437 reported a release in prog~ess but gave no information on
dose rates.
It was not until 0515 that an update message provided
integrated dose information to the state personnel.
The accuracy of-
_ update messages will be closely monitored during the remedial exercise.
No violations or deviattons were identified.
- 'It
'*
I
, I
e
e
4
8.
Emergency Communications (82301)
This area was observed to determine that provisions existed for prompt
communications among principal* response organization and emergency
personnel as required by 10 CFR 50.47(b)(6), 10 CFR 50, Appendix E,
Paragraph IV.E, and specific criteria in NUREG-0654, Section 11.F.
Communi cati ans among the licensee
I s emergency response facilities and
~mergency organization and between the licensee
I s emergency response
organization and offsite authorities appeared adequate throughout the
exercise with the exception of the OSC ring down phone to the control room
which did not work.
This was noted by the licensee.
No violations or deviations were identified.
9.
Emergency Facilities And Equipment (82301)
This area was observed to determine that adequate emergency facilities and
equipment to support an emergency res~onse were provided and maintained as
required by 10 CFR 50.47(b)(8), 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Paragraph IV.E, and
specific criteria in NUREG-0654, Section.II.H.
There were no emergency facilities and equipment deficiencies noted by the
inspectors during the exercise.
1,
No ~iolations or deviations were identified.
10.
Public Education and Information (82301)
This area was observed to determine that information concerning the
simulated emergency was made available for dissemination to the public as
required by 10 CFR 50.47(b)(7), 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Paragraph IV.D, and
specific criteria in NUREG-0654,Section II.G.
Information was provided to the media and the public_in advance of the
exercise.
During the exercise a local med'ia center was promptly
established to coordim~te news announcements with offsite emergency
response agencies.
No violations or deviations were identified.
11. Accident Assessment (82301)
This area was observed to assure that adequate methods, systems, and
equipment for assessing and monitoring actual or potential offsite
consequences of a radiological emergency condition were in use as required
by 10 CFR 50.47(b)(9), 10 CFR 50, Appendix E,. Paragraph IV.B, and specific
criteria in NUREG-0654,Section II.I *
The accident assessment program included both an engineering *assessment of
plant status and an assessment of radiological hazards to both onsite and
. 'It
,,
' i'
,,.*
..... ~.
- , .,
5
offsite personnel resulting from the accident.
The engineering accident
assessment team appeared to function effectively for its limited role in
this exercise.
However, the radiological assessment was unsatisfactory in that it failed
to direct the Station Emergency Manager (SEM) to classify a radioactive
rel ease event at the Site Area Emergency Level al though dose to the
general public at the site area boundary reached 1.2 rem over a one hour
period.
Additionally, the SEM did not request from his staff what the
site boundary dose rates and integrated dose commitment to the general
public would be for the release in progress.
In effect, the failures of
emergency procedural adherence by the SEM and the Radiological Assessment
Director were contributing factors to the SAE not being declared until
prompted by the controllers.
The scope of this exercise was such that the recognition of the SAE was
the most significant goal for the licensee to achieve in demonstrating a
satisfactory test of its Emergency Plan and Procedures.
Licensee
management demonstrated their awareness of the s i gni fi cance of the
demonstrated performance by stating at the critique, prior to the NRC
1 s
exit, they would redo their exercise.
No violations or deviations were identified.
12.
Protective Responses (82301)
-
.
This area was observed to determine that guidelines for protective actions
during the emergency, consistent with Federal guidance, were tleveloped and
in pl ace, and protective acti ans for emergency workers, including
evacuation of nonessential personnel, were implemented promptly as
required by 10 CFR 50.47{b)(10), and specific criteria in NUREG-0654,
Section II.J.
An inspector verified that the 1 i censee had emergency procedures for
formulating protective actioo recommendations for offsite populations
within the 10-mile EPZ.
Additionally, onsite protective actions for
personnel accountability appeared adequate.
No violations or deviations were identified.
13.
Action On Previous Inspection Findings (92701)
a.
(Closed) IFI 50-280, 281/87-29-01.
A -previous inspection noted the
need for training and instructions to emphasize that initial
notifications must be completed within 15 minutes after the
declaration of an emergency.
Notifications were made promptly
following emergency declarations.
b.
(Closed) IFI 50-280, 281/87-29-05.
Normal plant responsibility
should be temporarily removed from exercise participants to remove
,'
- t
',
'
.. ,
!,_1.
-
- . ' . :. ~:, ... _.--
.
-
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- .. * . *' .. *, * ..
- ,,
.,.
-* . .
.
:---;-----:--*:--*-----*.-. -
.. ~--
c.
d.
e.
f.
e
6
confusion.
An_ exercise player shift with no normal plant
responsibilities was available for the exercise.
(Closed) !Fl 50-280, 281/87-29-07. Provide training to OSC personnel
regarding the use of radios.
No comments were noted at the critique
identifying problems with OSC personnel
1s use of radios.
(Closed) IFI 50-280, 281/87-29-13.
During the initial notification
to Control Room provide sufficient information to ensure that prompt
and correct actions are being initiated.
This exercise did not
identify problems regarding completeness of information provided to
the Control Room.
(Closed) IFI 50-280, 281/87-29-14.
Improve health physics and
contamination control in areas of suspected contamination.
There
were no problems identified in this area during the exercise.
(Closed} IFI 50-280, 281/87-29~15.
Conduct critique in each
emergency facility with all players immediately following the
exercise. The inspector observed the critiques immediately following
the exercise.
14.
Exercise Critique (82301}
The licensee
I s critique of the emergency exercise was observed to
determine that deficiencies identified as a result of the exercise and
weaknesses noted in the licensee
1 s emergency response organization were
formally presented to the licensee management for corrective actions as
required .by 10 CFR 50.47(b}(l4), 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Paragraph IV.E,
and specific criteria in NUREG-0654,Section II.N.
A formal licensee critique was held on November 2, 1988, with exercise
controllers, licensee management, and NRC personnel in attendance._ The
licensee discussed areas of the exercise in whi~h corrective actions were
required.
Following the controller* provided observati ans, the Sta ti on
Manager committed to redo the drill on or about March 1, 1989.
He also
committed to have all health physics operating shift personnel retrained
in their respective procedures and participate in table top drills. The
retraining efforts would be within 90 days.
Following the Station
Manager
1s presentation, the NRC team leader noted concurrence with the
licensee 1s assessment of their performance and commitment to corrective
action.
The NRC inspector summarized the _inspection observed findings
into one significant exercise weakness as follows:
The licensee failed to
recognize and declare a Site Area Emergency on the basis of integrated
whole body dose projected at the site boundary exceeding EAL, due to the
-**---....,..._~----------- *---
-~.,
~~ :* .. * .. , .... ~ .. ~- .-: *.
I
. /
- *it
,,
'
d!
, ..
7
release from a waste gas decay tank. This will be tracked as an inspector
followup item (IFI) 50-280, 281/88-43-01.
Item Number
50-280, 281/88-30-01
Attachment:
Objectives and Scenario
Time Line
Description and Reference
Significant Exercise Weakness - Failure to
- Recognize and Classify a Site Area
Emergency (Paragraph 14)o
. 'It
'*
'
. I
- **,~:..,,*
\\ :~. *,, .*. **-.: .-.':.,' -**"'-= * .. '" =. ~"**'* ... -:":* ~-- ;** . ~-* .... _.:*~~ *.** *.* =* *. **_::- ._-*....
..
,'
.. * **-~: .. -.~-
- .* :. ~ *;. - .
~**
- .
. . ...
-
.
-
e
e
OBJECTIVES OF *EXERCISE
The objectives of this exercise are to demonstrate by actual
performance a number of key emergency preparedness functions as
they relate to the Surry Power Station Emergency Plan.
The
simulated accident will involve response and subsequent recovery
actions to include:
emergency classification, notification of
company personnel and off-site organizations, simulated actions
to correct the emergency condition, and initiation of accident
assessment and protective actions as necessary to cope with the
event, which will include a
simulated off-site radiological
release.
The intent of this effort is to demonstrate the
adequacy of the Surry Emergency Plan
(SEP), the Emergency - Plan
Implementing Procedures (EPIPs), the Corporate Emergency Response
Plan (CERP),
and the Corporate Plan Implementing Procedures
(CPIPs).
Simulations of some aspects of emergency preparedness,
without actual demonstrations by the Station or.
corporate
entities, may occur where it is impractical to call for personnel
imvolvement.
The
following objectives have been developed in order
to
establish the scope of the 1988 Surry Power Station Emergency
Preparedness Exercise.
The objectives ensure that required
events are included in the exercise scenario,
and establish
criteria to be evaluated by controllers and observers during the
conduct of the exercise.
..
, I I
'
it
t .:
I'
, ... *.*::.-:..~.: :_-,***_ .. :.: * .. **.:,:* *.** --,__;.e:* . *- *, ..*.. * .. * .... -~-~~---~--; .. ' .. "*: ~
.,r~ ****:* . **, .. * *.-.. *, ..
- .
. .*
,-.. -~* .. - *: .. *- :-=-:--~~_:,-:-;:-;;--
..
. A.
OVERALL STATION OBJECTIVES
1)
Demonstrate the ability to make proper decisions related
to radiation exposure and to implement those decisions.
2)
Demonstrate the ability to establish and maintain
emergency management control of station operations and
maintenance.
3)
Demonstrate the ability to make protective action
recommendations that protect station personnel and the
general public, as appropriate.
4)
Demonstrate the ability to augment the on-shift emergency
organization to support emergency operations in a timely
and effective manner.
5)
Initiate the exercise between midnight and 6 a.m.
6)
Demonstrate the ability to evacuate designated
non-essential personnel from the site.
7)
Demonstrate the ability to transition into the recovery
mode~
8)
Conduct an effective critique in order to disclose
significant exercise findings which requi~e corrective
actions.
-
B.
OPERATIONS OBJECTIVES
1)
Demonstrate the ability to recognize operational symptoms
indicative of degrading plant conditions.
2)
Demonstrate the ability to clasify the emergency in
accordance with Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures.
3)
Demonstrate the ab~lity to use.* notification/alerting
procedures and methods.
4)
Demonstrate the ability to communicate with supporting
locations.
C.
SECURITY' OBJECTIVES
1)
Demonstrate access control and security for the station
and the Local Emergency Operations Facility.
2)
Demonstrate station employee accountability.
3)
Demonstrate the ability to support site evacuation *
4)
Demonstrate call-out of station personnel, as necessary.
I
.1
.. t
',
...
J *. ~.
e
.De
HEALTH PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY OBJECTIVES
1)
Demonstrate the ability to perform radiological
monitoring activities and assessments, and to formulate
offsite radiological dose projections.
2)
Demonstrate collection and analysis of appropriate sample
media necessary to assess radiation levels and support
dose assessment activities.
3)
Demonstrate use of communications by the monitoring
teams.
4)
Demonstrate response to and analysis of simulated
elevated airborne and/or liquid activity levels and of
simulated elevated area radiation levels.
E.
EMERGENCY RESPONSE FACILITY OBJECTIVES
1)
Demonstrate activation of the following Emergency
Response Facilities:
Control Room (CR)
Technical Support Center (TSC)
Operational Support Center (OSC)
Local Emergency Operations Facility (LEOF)
Corporate Emergency Response Center (CERC)
Public News Center (PNC)
Local Media Center (LMC)
2)
Demonstrate the* communications capabilities of the
Control Room, TSC, osc, LEOF and~CERC, and the ability to
maintain these conmiunications with Federal, State, and
local governments, as appropriate.
This shall include
sending, receiving, and understanding the content of
messages involved.*
3)
Demonstrate the proper utilization of the Emergency
Response Facilities and that adequate emergency r~sponse
equipment exists.
- ~
,,
.'I
~. _\\
'
I
-:v-e--.-.. -.,.~* =,
- V--:--.-:--::-r:*-:;,r*~*. ~
/ ."
,*,;* * *"
'*"'
. *
-,',
- +*
,-
- '
.
....... ,* ..
- '*
.
...,..
..
..,.,---..
,.
___ _,
.
-
.. ;
--~-' ..- .,
- ..
e
F.
'CORPORATE OBJECTIVES
1)
Demonstrate that the LEOF can be adequately staffed to
maintain communications, coordinate the utilization of
offsite monitoring teams, recommend offsite protective
measures to the State, and transit into the recovery
mode.
2)
Demonstrate that the CERC can be adequately staffed to
provide engineering assistance, maintain communications,
and provide logistic support.
3)
Demonstrate that the PNC and LMC can be adequately
staffed to coordinate news announcements with offsite
emergency response agencies, distribute releases in a
timely manner, conduct timely and informative media
briefings, and respond to outside news inquiries, if
received.
- it
'*
'
. I
.,
-
-
- :
- :
- **
. *. "'l'
- , *. '
--..0:-.--
,*:.
.
.
. *
.
.. *
.
.
.
.
--
- -:-*-:-*-,~_---.*-. -*,.-:-_-
Date
Time
e
e
1988 SURRY EMERGENCY EXERCISE
TIME LINE STATED IN REAL TIME
No. Message/Event
"October 31, 1988
1515
O Message to station management providing initial
conditions.
November 1, 1988
0045
1 Message to Drill Shift Supervisor providing initial
conditions.
Exercises conunences.
0100
2 Initial scenario message - Severe thunderstorm and
tornado watch notification received from System
Operator.
0145
5 Severe thunderstorm and tornado warning notification
received from System Operator~
0210
8 Operator at bridge over Discharge Canal reports a
0212
0220-
0221
0224
0227
funnel cloud near the discharge groin.
9
DP *1 confirms approaching funnel cloud.
11
DP *1 reports a tornado over recreation area baseball
field.
12
DP *2 reports tornado approaching Discharge Canal.
13 Drill Security Shift Supervisor verifies funnel
.approaching station.
14
DP *1 reports tornado onsite.
..
0228
15
Operator in back yard confirms tornado onsite.
0228
. 16
BORON RECOVERY TK A HI-LO Level alarm actuates.
AN ALERT IS DECLARED
0232
17
Spent Fuel Pit Low Level alarm actuates.
0234
18
DP #1 reports observed damage to the PA barrier and
in the RCA.
0236
19
DP il reports observed damage to building structures
in the RCA.
-
- *
- '
.** * *.
- -,ro
. *
. .
- * *
'
- - -
- *
- ** * *
- *
- *
- .
- *
- -: *
~-
- :
- *
'
. *
- * ~-:.
.
- *
- . *
- -**
~ . *
- * _-:: ** -
-
. 'Iv
'*
I
I
Date
. Time
0236
e
No. Message/Event
19A Primary Water Tank High Level alarm actuates.
0236
l9B CAS alarm on Fuel Building door actuates.
-0240
0242.
0244
0.250 -
21
RWST High Level alarms.
22
DP i2 reports damage observed to structures in the
RCA.
23
DP i3 reports direction of tornado path.
24A Security Officer finds road to LEOF blocked by a
tree.
0315
27
Unit 1 Smoke Detector alarm actuates.
0320
28
Smoke ~mpedes entry toil EOG Room.
0325
29
Emergency Generator il trouble alarm actuates.
0325
30 Air compressor belts determined to be,cause of smoke
0330
0340-
0400
in il EDG room.
31
System Operator notifies Drill Shift Supervisor that
severe weather warning has been lifted.
32
Unit 1 Loose Parts Monitor alarm actuates - will not
reset on investigation.
36
Process Vent high activity alarm actuates.
A SITE AREA EMERGENCY IS DECLARED
0401
37
Containment High Range Gamma Area Monitor alarm
actuates.
..
0500
38V Data:
"A" WGDT zero pressure-* release terminated.
0600 +
45
Exercise terminated.
. 'It
'*
'
~
! .
I'
Date
Time
"October
T-0945
November
T-0015
T+OOOO
T+0045
T+OllO
T+0112
T+0!'20
T+0121
T+0124
T+0127
T+0128
T+0128
- T+0132
T+0134
T+0136
No.
31,
0
1,
e
e
1988 SURRY EMERGENCY EXERCISE
TIME LINE STATED IN SCENARIO TIME
Message/Event
1988
Message to station management providing initial
conditions.
1988
1 Message to Drill Shift Supervisor providing initial
conditions.
Exercises conunences:
2 Initial scenario message - Severe thunderstorm and
tornado watch notification received from System
Operator.
5 Severe thunderstorm and tornado warning notification
received from System Operatore
8 Operator at bridge over Discharge Canal reports a
funnel cloud near the discharge groin.
9
DP il confirms approaching funnel cloud.
11
DP #1 reports a tornado over recreation area baseball
field.
12
DP #2 reports tornado approaching Discharge Canal.
13 Drill Security Shift Supervisor verifies funnel
approaching station.
14
DP #1 reports tor~ado onsi~e.
15 Operator in back yard confirms tornado onsite.
16
Boron Recovery TK .A HI-LO Level alarm actuates.
AN ALERT IS DECLARED
17 Spent Fuel Pit Low Level alarm actuates.
18
DP #1 reports observed damage to-the PA barrier and
in the RCA.
19
DP #1 reports observed damage to building structures
in the RCA.
- ~
,,
---*.
-*
- - ~
.. -.
-~-
.. : -:. **.*: ,, '
.. *:~?:.****
.
- .
.
.
~
.
*
i,
..
. .
"
Date*
- l'ime
T+0136
T+0136
-T+0140
T+0142
T+0144
T+OlSO-
T+0215
T:t-0220
T+0225
T+0225
T+0230
T+0240
T+0300
T+0301
T+0400
e
No. Message/Event
19A Primary Water Tank High Level alarm actuates.
19B CAS alarm on Fuel Building door actuates.
21
RWST High Level. alarm actuates.
22
DP t2 reports damage observed to structures in the
RCA.
23
DP t3 reports direction of tornado path.
24A Security Officer finds road to LEOF blocked by a
27
28
29
30
31
32
36
tree.
Unit 1 Smoke Detector alarm actuates.
Smoke impedes entry to tl EDG Room.
Emergency Generator 11 trouble alarm actuateso
Air compressor belts determined to be cause of smoke
in tl EDG room.
System Operator notifies Drill Shift Supervisor that
severe weather warning has been lifted.
Unit 1 Loose Parts Monitor alarm actuates - will not
reset on investigation.
Process Vent high activity alarm actuates.
A SITE AREA EMERGENCY IS DECLARED
37
Containment High Range Gamma Area Monitor alarm
actuates.
..
38V Data:
"A" WGDT zero pressure - release terminated.
T+OSOO+
45
Exercise terminated.
.
.
. *'* ~-
- ..
- .:*
..-- ..
'
I
. 'It
,,