ML18152A115

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Summarizes 920110 Mgt Meeting Concerning Facility Self Assessment.List of Attendees & Handouts Encl
ML18152A115
Person / Time
Site: Surry  Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 01/21/1992
From: Reyes L
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To: Stewart W
VIRGINIA POWER (VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO.)
References
NUDOCS 9202140089
Download: ML18152A115 (45)
v • d • e


Text

I, i 'I I

! I, JAN 2 l 10(V)

Docket Nos. 50-280, 50-281 License Nos. DPR-32, DPR-37 Virginia Electric and Power Company ATTN:

Mr. W. L. Stewart Senior Vice President - Nuclear 5000 Dominion Boulevard Glen Allen,.VA 23060 Gentlemen:

SUBJECT:

MANAGEMENT MEETING

SUMMARY

- SELF-ASSESSMENT OF SURRY POWER STATION This letter refers to the Management Meeting held on January 10, 1992, at the Region II office.

The meeting concerned a self-assessment for your Surry facility.

Your Vice President, Nuclear Operations, opened the formal presenta-tion and members of the Virginia Electric and Power Company presented the performance assessment.

A list of attendees, and a copy of your handout are enclosed.

In accordance with Section 2.790 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice", Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter and its enclosures will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.

Should you have any questions concerning this letter, please let us know.

Enclosures:

1. List of Attendees
2.

Handout - Slides Presented cc w/encl:

E. W. Harre 11 Vice President - Nuclear Operations Virginia Electric & Power Company 5000 Dominion Boulevard Glen Allen, VA 23060 cc w/encl cont'd:

See page 2 9202140089 920121 PDR ADOCK 05000280 p

PDR Sincerely, Original Signed by.

Jon R. Johnson /for Luis A. Reyes, Director Division of Reactor Projects

Virginia Electric and Power Company cc w/encl cont'd:

J. P. O'Hanlon Vice President - Nuclear Services Virginia Electric & Power Company 5000 Dominion Boulevard Glen Allen, VA 23060 M. R. Kansler Station Manager Surry Power Station P. 0. Box 315 Surry, VA *23883 M. L. Bowling, Jr., Manager Nuclear Licensing*

Virginia Electric & Power Co.

5000 Dominion Boulevard Glen Allen, VA* 23060 Sherlock Holmes, Chairman Board of Supervisors of Surry Surry County Courthouse Surry, VA 23683 Dr. W. T. Lough Virginia State Corporation Commission Division of Energy Regulation P. 0, Box 1197

  • Richmond, VA 23209 Michael W. Maupin Hunton and Williams P. 0. Box 1535 Richmond, VA 23212 C. M. G. Buttery, M.D., M.P.H.

State Health Commissioner Office of the Commissioner Virginia Department of Health P. 0. Box 2448 Richmond, VA 23218 Attorney General Supreme Court Building 101 North 8th Street Richmond, VA 23219 bee w/encl:

See ~age 3 Col!nty 2

JAN 211992 I

Virginia Electric and Power Company bee w/encl:

J. Johnson, RI I P. Fredrickson, RII B. Bue kl ey, NRR Document Control Desk NRC Resident Inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Route 1, Box 166 Surry, VA 23883 NRC Resident Inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Route 2, Box 78-A Mineral, VA 23117 R;Jl_RP ARuff

  • 01/p /92 RI~

PF~~ri ckson 01/\\\\)/92 RII:DRP Ml/5 MSinkule 011q /92 3

JAN ?J 1992

'\\

ENCLOSURE 1 MANAGEMENT MEETING LIST OF ATTENDEES Virginia Electric and Power Company (Virginia Power)

J. O'Hanlon, Vice President, Nuclear Operations M. Kansler, Station Manager - Surry M. Bowling, Manager, Licensing A. Price, Assist~nt Station Manager - Surry E. Smith, Manager, Quality Assurance - Surry Nuclear Regulatory Commission -Region II S. Ebneter, Regional AdrninistratQr, Region II (RII)

L. Reyes, Directo~, Division of Reactor Projects (DRP), R1I J. Johnson, Deputy Director, DRP, RII E. Merschoff, Deputy Director, Division of Reactor Safety (DRS), RII B. Mallett, Deputy, Director, Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards,* RII M. Sink~le, Branch Chief, DRP~ RII

  • P. Fredrickson, Section Chief, bRP, RII M-. Branch, Senior Resident* Inspector, Surry, RII F. Jape! Section.Chief, DRS, RII_

Nuclear Regulatory Cof11Tlission - Headquarters H~ Berkow, Dir~ct6r, Proj~ct Directorate 11-2 (PD II-2), NRR B. Buckley, Project Manager, PD II-2, NRR (Via telecon)

Su.rry Power Station Self Assessment.*

VIRGINIA POWER January 10,.1992

  • Introduction VIRGINIA POWER J.f'. O'Hanlon :

. Vice ~resident -- N1,1,clear Operations

A~enda ------------------

MRGIIWAPOWEII Introduction Surry Performance Overview Surry Self Assessment Summary by SALP Category Surry Quality,Program Summary Concluding Remarks

J.P. O'Hanlon 1\\11.R. Kansler J.A. Price.

E.R. Smith, Jr.

M.R. Kansler 1 IWlll 111,

I

\\

Surry Per:formance. Overview..

  • VIRGINIA POWER M.R. Kansler Station Manager I l"Ua,111,_,

Net Ge11erati<>*t1 Millions MWH 12--.-----------------------'--------------

  • 10.57 10.67 9

6 3

0

  • Current $ALP Began April_ 1, 1991

..... VTDGoal

Rettcl<>r 1"'riJJs --------------------~-

. Automatic Reactor Trips a-------------------.;__-----------------,

6 4

3 2

1 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 Q--f------------------.----

Jan Feb Mar Apr*

May Jun Jul Sep Oct Nov

  • Current SALP Began April 1, 1991

Unj>lanne,l Safety 5)1ste111 Actuati<111s Safety System Actuations 10---------~~~---------------------,

8 6

4 3

2 2

0 0

0 0.

0 0

0 0 -------------------..--..-

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul o

o

. o*.

()

Sep Oct Nov Goal

  • cu,.rent SALP ~an April 1, 1991 LO.Cl.07

Acl1,1,al/Planned 01,1,tage.. \\'cl,e,/11/e -----------

1991 Jan Feb Mar Jun Surry 1 67 Days 7Days Surry 2

,~s~Tu~~\\~::;:~:~~ii?s~t:<:~~:::fo:.

  • e t *
  • ,e )I 8GDaya 23 Daya

[g:::J Actual D P1anned

  • Contingency Jul n

tl rn 01 4A Days j 8.7 Day Oct Nov I Dec

&Days L.OteO.OI

l'ers<>1111el G'<>11ltttni11ali<>11 EtJe11ts Events 200

  • Current SALP Began April 1, 1991 170 YTDGoal

C'ollective Ra.,1ialion ExjJ<>s11 re Man-Rems*

100-T"~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~..,-..,-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--,

598 600 500 504.8

  • ~-

400 300

'\\

200 100

  • Current SALP Began April 1, 1991 VTDGoal LD4I0.10.

Total G'o11t,11ninatetl Arei1 Square Feet

  • 28000 21000 14000 7000 0

23431.

  • Current SALP Began April 1, 1991 YTDGoal l0490.1.1
  • Ra,liottclive E.[f111e11ts -(;aseous (G'uries) _______ _

Curies 600...:...,...-------------,---------------~-----,

500 500 400 300 200 100 2.7 2.9 8.3 0

Feb Jan Mar I Apr

  • Current SALP Began April 1, 1991 YTDGoal I

UMI0.17

Radi<>ttc:tive E_[fluents -* Li<Jlli<l (G'11ries), ________ _

Curies 4.000 -----------~-----------------------,

3.001 3.040. 3:044 3.000 2.000 1.000

.000

  • Current SALP Began Aprll 1, 1991 YTDGoal l0480.II

No11-()11la?,e C'orrective Mai11/e11ll11ce Backlog--------

Work Orders 800 ~-----'----'7...:C9...;..1 __ -"--________________________ __, ___

600 400 200 0

  • Current SALP Began April 1, 1991 Incomplete Non-Safety Related YTDGoal

A,,era~e A.t:e (~{ Corrective Mai11/e11,111ce lVork Requests--------

Days 350 3001 28" II 250 200 150 100 50 0

  • Current SALP Began April 1, 1991 YTDGoal L04IO.t3

(~'orrecli-tJe Mainte11ance Baclt.l<>J!, <>l<ler 1"'/.,a-,, 90 Days-----

250 200 150 100 50 o-1--=::;:===:;:::::==========::::=========-_J Jan Feb Sep Oct_

Mar Apr May Jun Jul

  • Current SALP Began April 1, 1991

-SR Aug Nov

-NSR Dec.

-NSO LD480.14

E.. 1nergen<-:y /)iesel Ge11er,ilor Jleli,1/JilitJ' ------~--

Reliability

  • 1.000 -..-----------;990-_990-_990------

.980

.980

.980 * - -

.980

.980

.950

.900

.850

.800

  • Current SALP Began April 1, 1991

~

YTDGoal 1.0410.t5

,\\'t~fe(y 5,),sletn U1ttlVltilt1/JililJ 1 - - - - - - - - - - -

Unavailable Houts 1991 Goal High Head Safety Injection

1991.. 51-1rry1 1~erf<>r1na11ce A cc<Jmplis l11nenls ---------------

lmlGIMAP'OWl!R

  • Reduction of Maintenance Back-Logs and Reduced Age of Outstanding Work Orders
  • Control of Personnel Radiation Dose and Personnel Contamination Events

- Lowest Annual Total Exposure in Station's History.

  • Safe and Reliable Reactor Operation, Including Strong Performance of Safety Systems
  • Successful Emergency Drill and Simultaneous Prompt Response to RCP Motor Transportation Event
  • Implemented $42 Million Capital Improvements
  • Placed New Radiological Waste Facility in Service
  • Placed New Primary Security Access in Service

F<>c1.1s Areas ---------i..--------

MIIGMIIAPOlaBI

  • Management Oversight
  • Manual Operator Action/Administrative Controls
  • Root Cause/Effectiveness of Corrective Actions
  • Post Maintenance Testing
  • Technical Specification Issues
  • Setpoints*and Scaling

Reg11,lal<>r:J' Per:{<>r1nt11lce ---------

lmlOMIIAPOIWR LERs Non-Cited Violations Cited Violations Current SALP 33 7

9 Previous SALP 23

15.

9

.5urry Perf<>rmance Ann11ncit1lor Panel Personnel Performance Equipment Performance Program Performance RCSAnd Ae9c:tor ESF s.oondafy n-tps Ac..... lons System Integrity I

I -

r Net Emergency Generation(

Plant Preparedlwss Tll<<mal Avalld>lllly Equipn.tt Pertom1911ee

. Avalleblllly Red a

  • Slgnlftcant Weakne*

Yellow D -Improvement Needed Status for 1991

. I *-

I I

Key Safety Sywm Fuel Sya141m Aellablllly P<<fonn__,.......

CotNMlorl

..,..lablllty I

Chemistry White D. s.11etactory Green a

  • SIQnlflcant Strength

Surry Seif Assessment

. Summary By SALP Category VIRGINIA.POWER

  • J.A. Price

, Assistant Stali<Jn Manager-*

N1,1.clear Safely And Licensing

-I

. I IWII) P1

1~lt111l ()JJert1li<>ns (J'1.,rre111.SAL/>,~eri<><I -------------

MIIOMIIAPOIWIR

, \\'/ren l!, I b s

  • Safety Attitude
  • Operator Performance
  • -Startup

- Reduced Inventory

- Transients

  • Training

- Requalification *

- Management Participation in Simulator Training Sessions

  • Lower Tolerance to Nonconforming Conditions
  • Accountability Program 1

Cballe11!!,eS

  • System Configuration Control
  • Administrative Control Issues*
  • Previous SALP Challenge IIMM.,,

llt1tli<>l<>gict1l C~'<>11lr<>ls c.:urrenl.\\'AJ.,J' f>eri<><I -------------

Vlft'OMIIAPOWl_,....,'61_

Stre11pJ hs

  • Management Involvement
  • Experience Level of Staff
  • Training of Personnel
  • Radwaste Facility
  • Self Identification of Problems
  • Source Term Reduction/Five Year Dose Reduction Plan
  • Continuing* Program Improvement
  • Dedicated Radiological Engineering Group*
  • Contamination Control C/J(1/le11~es
  • Maintain High Levels of Performance
  • Continued Reduction in Personnel Exposure
  • and Contaminated Area

M ainle11t1 nee /.5 u rveillt111ce G'11.rrenl ~\\'ALP Period --------------VMGaBAPOW&f Strengths

  • Improvement in Plant Material Condition*
  • Reduc,ion in Both Number and Age of Work Order Back Log*
  • Improving Trends in l&C Perform~nce
  • Predictive and Diagnostic Programs *
  • Management Involvement
  • Improved Planning/Scheduling*
  • Component Failure Analyses*,

I CIJalle11ges

  • Continue Improvement in Plant Material Condition*
  • Continue Improvement in Post Maintenance.Test Program Implementation*
  • Continue Development of Maintenance Procedures*
  • Effectiveness of Corrective Actions
  • Previous SALP Challenge I rMM"'

E111erge11cy JJreJ1t1re,l11ess

(,'1.1rrent.5ALP Peri<Jd -------------

ll'MOMIIAl"Oll1EK

'SlrenJ.!lbs

  • Continued Management Focus
  • Drill Program
  • Effective Management of Damage Control Team Actions
  • Proactive Coordination with Off-Site Authorities CI.Jallenges
  • Maintain High Level of Performance U)4t0,17

.Security G'1i-rre11t.. SALJJ J>eri<><l -------------

lmfOIJIIIAPOll'Er

  • St re11!!,l bs
  • Personnel Performance, Staffing, and Training
  • Corporate and Station Management Support
  • Security Plan Reviews and Audit Programs
  • New Primary Access and Egress Areas Cba.llenges
  • Maintain High Level of Performance

Engineerin?,!Tecl111ict1/.51.1/JJJ<Jrl Current SALP Peri<Jd --------------

WINMIIAl'OlftW Strengths

  • Proactive Involvement in Plant Problems
  • System and Design Engineering Support of Operations and Maintenance
  • Program Accountability and Single Point of Contact for Major
  • Project Prioritization/Lessons Learned/Corrective Action Process
  • Post Maintenance Testing Administration and Program Enhancements*
  • Comprehensive Training Program and Facilities
  • Technical Procedures Upgrade Program*

Challenges

  • Management of Emerging. Issues
  • Change Control Issues
  • Previous SALP Chai lenge

Sa_fety Assess1ne11l/QualilJ' Verificatio11 C'urrent.5ALP Peri<Jd -------------

l'MOMMPOIJIIEII Stre11gtbs

  • Improved Commitment/Management Tracking Programs *
  • Reduced RCS Inventory Management
  • Licensing Top Ten" List
  • Reduction of Licensing Backlogs *
  • M~nagement Involvement
  • Enhanced QA Audit Process
  • Performance Assessment Program

.

  • Operating Experience/Trending and Analysis Programs Challenges
  • Manual Operator Action/Administrative Control Issues
  • Technical Specifications Issues
  • Previous SALP Challenge
  • Surry Quality Program

.Summary.***

.. E.R. Smith, Jr.

Manager - Quality Assurance l04eo.31

JJr<>aclive Qttt1lil)' Ass1,1rt111ce Desired Fe<Jl11res-. ----------------

wmMMPOlftll

- *

  • Provide Early Detection of Problems
  • Monitor Effective and Timely Corrective Actions
  • Encourage and Promote High Level of Performance
  • Determine Overall State of Quality

Q1,1alil)' "4ss11ra11ce 1~r<>grt1111 Elements ------------------

llmftMIIAPOltEJI'

  • Organization

- Management Involvement

- Personnel Knowledge and Skill

- Communication/Interface

- Attention to Emerging Problems

    • Programs/Processes

-Adequacy

  • - Effectiveness
  • Equipment/Facilities

- Reliability

-Condition

  • Human Performance

- Human Factors

- Procedure Adherence

- Attention to Detail

Qu.t1lil)' Ass11rt111ce ljr<>grt1111.

MellJ<><ls <~{Evt1/11t1li<J11

  • Inspections
  • Audits

- Performance Based Versus Compliance Based

- Use of Technical Specialists

- Integrated. Process

  • Performance Evaluations/Observations

- Dynamic Scheduling

_;_ Safety Significant Issues

  • Integrated Performance Assessments
  • - Corporate Nuclear Safety

- Nuclear Operations Support

- Engineering

  • Performance Assessments

- Maintenance

- Radiological Protection

- Operations

- Engineering

._\\'lt-1le ()f Q11alilJ'

()J,erations ---------------------------

Fully Acceptable 1--r-------------------------------,

Acceptable 2

  • Unsatisfactory
  • 3 Unacceptable 4-t---

1.9 8/89 1.7 1.7 1.6 2/90 9/90 11191

Slt1le (~f Q11alitJ'

()JJerali<>11s Il.es11lts ------------

WIIOMIIAPOIW&I

  • Satisfactory Performance

- 7.Areas Improved

. - Uncontrolled Operator Aids

  • Needed Improvement

- 7 Areas Remained the Same (> 2.Q)

- Administrative Log*s

L Stale ()f Q11,1lil)'

  • Radiol<>~ica/ l.,roleclio11 ------------------

Fully Acceptable

. 1-.-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--,-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-----.

  • Acceptable 2'

Unsatisfactory 3

Unacceptable 4-----

1.3 1.3 1/91 10/91 lDM0.37

.\\'/ale <~{ QualilJ' M t1inte11a 11ce Fully Acceptable 1-------------------------"'------------

  • Acceptable 2

Unsatisfactory 3

Unaccepta_ble 4 _._ _

2.2 8/90 2.0 2.1 3191 12/91

..\\'lttle (~f*Q11t1lilJ' Mttinlen1nce Res11lts -.....-----------

MIIOMIIAP0-11-IEI

  • Satisfactory Performance

- 9 Areas Improved

- Compliance With Radiation Work Permits *

  • Needed Improvement

- 8 Areas Remained the Same (> 2.0)

- Post Maintenance Testing

Slttle Qf Q11t1lilJ'

()/Jservt,1/i<>11s ------------------

VllfGlfl!IIAl"Olt'Eft

  • Management Involvement
  • Improving Operations and Mai,ntenance.
  • Strong Commitment to Performance Improvements

ManttJ!,erne11/ Assess111e11l ----------

lmlORIAP'Olftft

.

  • Management and Staff are-Mission and Goal Oriented
  • Craftsmen Have a High Level of Knowledge and Skill *
  • Lateral Integration is Good and Getting Better
  • Commitment* to Continuous Improvement
Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML18152A115&oldid=4988156"