ML18150A030
| ML18150A030 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Surry  |
| Issue date: | 04/15/1987 |
| From: | Rubenstein L Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Stewart W VIRGINIA POWER (VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO.) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18150A031 | List: |
| References | |
| TAC-59754, NUDOCS 8704170007 | |
| Download: ML18150A030 (4) | |
Text
.. i**.
e Docket No. 50-281 Mr. W. L. Stewart Apri 1 15, 1987 e
DISTRIBUTION Docket File NRC PDR Local PDR PAD#2 Rdg C. Patel Vice President - Nuclear Operations Virginia Electric and Power Company Post Office Box 26666 T. Novak OGC-Bethesda E. Jordan D. Miller ACRS (10)
Tech Branch Gray File Richmond, Virginia 23261
Dear Mr. Stewart:
B. Grimes ll. Partlow N. Thompson
Subject:
Request for Relief from ASME Section XI Requirements, Surry Power Station Unit No. 2 By letter dated September 19, 1985, as supplemented September 30, 1986, pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55a, paragraph g(5), you requested relief from certain ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (ASME Code)Section XI requirements at Surry Unit 2 for the first ten-year inspection interval.
We have reviewed your request.
Based on our review, we have concluded that the relief may be partially granted. This relief is applicable to the first ten-year inspection interval. The enclosed Safety Evaluation provides the details and conclusions of our review.
For the relief that has been granted, we have determined that the ASME Code Section XI requirements are impractical and that pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55a(g)(6)(i),
the relief is authorized by law and will not endanger life or property or the common defense and security and is otherwise in the public interest 9 giving due consideration to the burden upon the licensee that could result if the requirements were imposed on the facility. Further, the staff has determined, pursuant to 50.55a(3)(i), that the proposed alternative to the requirements of 50.55a(g) would provide *an acceptable level of quality and safety.
The request for relief complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commission's rules and regulations. Thus, the Commission having made the appropriate findings as required by the Act and the Commission's rules and regulations in 10 CFR Chapter I, approves your request for relief.
' B704i 10001: s70,:ri.,. -- - * - '\\
._ POR. ADOCK 05000281
-* ~~-*
_-* __ 2::___-_
_EQFL.
)
Enclosure:
As stated cc: See next page
- See previous concurrence
- LA:PAD#2 DMi 11 er 1/ /87
\\ __
- PM:PAD#2 CPatel :he 1/ /87 Sincerely, Lester S. Rubenstein, Director PWR Project Directorate #2 Division of PWR Licensing-A Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation PD: PAD#2
"-*OGC LRubenstein 1/ /87 1/ /87
- BC:EB RBallard 1/ /87
Docket No. 50-281 Mr. W. L. Stewart Vice President - Nuclear Operations Virginia Electric and Power Company Post Office Rox 26666 Richmond, Virginia 23261
Dear Mr. Stewart:
DISTRIBUTION Nocket File NRC PDR Local PDR PAD#2 Rdg T. Novak OGG-Bethesda E. Jordan B. Grimes J. Partlow N. Thompson C. Patel D. Miller ACRS ( 10)
Tech Branch Gray File
Subject:
Request for Relief from ASME Section XI Requirements, Surry Power Station Unit No. 2 By letter dated September 19, 1985, as supplemented September 30, 1986, pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55a, paragraph g(5), you requested relief from certain ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (ASME Code)Section XI requirements at Surry Unit 2 for the first ten-year inspection interval.
We have reviewed your request. Based on our review, we have concluded that the relief may be partially granted. This relief is applicable to the first ten-year inspection interval. The enclosed Safety Evaluation provides the details and conclusions of our review.
For the relief that has been granted, we have determined that the ASME Code Section XI requirements are impractical and that pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55a(g)(6)(i),
the relief is authorized by law and will not endanger life or property or the common defense and security and is otherwise in the public interest, giving due consideration to the burden upon the licensee that could result if the requirements were imposed on the facility. Further, the staff has determined, pursuant to 50.55a{3)(i), that the proposed alternative to the requirements of 50.55a(g) would provide an acceptable level of quality and safety.
The request for relief complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commission's rules and regulations. The Commission has made appropriate findings as required by the Act and the Commission's rules and regulations in 10 CFR Chapter I.
Enclosure:
As stated cc:
See next page
- See previous concurrence
- LA:PA0#2 OMi ller 1/ /87
- PM:PAD#2 CPatel:hc 1/ /87 p~
Sincerely, Lester S. Rubenstein, Director PWR Pro.iect Directorate #2 Division of PWR Licensing-A Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation h
~ 4*ya1rel, i?-:P='
fo'°"CVJY'l"~J
~ 0 ;., ~'°yur~"ne_ J/ ~/2 7
- BC:EB LRubenstein 4/7 /87.
RBallard 1/ /87
Docket No. 50-281 Mr. W. L. Stewart Vice President - Nuclear Operations Virginia Electric and Power Company Post Office Box 26666 Richmond, Virginia 23261
Dear Mr. Stewart:
DISTRIBUTION Docket File NRC PDR Local PDR PAD#2 Rdg T. Novak OGC-Bethesda E. Llordan B. Grimes
,J. Partlow N. Thompson C. Patel D. Miller ACRS (10)
Tech Branch Gray File
Subject:
Request for Relief from ASME Section XI Requirements, Surry Power Station Unit No. 2 By letter dated September 19, 1985, as supplemented September 30, 1986, pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55a, paragraph g(S), you requested relief from certain ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (ASME Code)Section XI requirements at Surry Unit 2 for the first ten-year inspection interval.
We have reviewed your request. Based on our review, we have concluded that the relief may be partially granted. This relief is applicable to the first ten-year inspection interval. The enclosed Safety Evaluation provides the details and conclusions of our review.
For the relief that has been granted, we have determined that the ASME Code Section XI requirements are impractical and that the relief request is authorized by law and will not endanger life or property or the common defense and security and is otherwise in the public interest, giving due consideration to the burden upon the licensee that could result if the requirements were imposed on the facility.
The request for relief complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commission's rules and regulations. The Commission has made appropriate findings as required by the Act and the Commission's rules and regulations in 10 CFR Chapter I.
Enclosure:
As stated cc:
See next L,.A~
D er 1/~ 87 page f
PM:rfo#2 CPatel :he l//lf/87 Sincerely, Lester S. Rubenstein, Director PWR Project Directorate #2 Division of PWR Licensinq-A Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation PD:PAD#2 LRubenstein 1/ /87 OGC 1/ /87
Mr. W. L. Stewart Virginia Electric and Power Comoa_ny cc:
Mr. Michael W. Maupin Hunton and Williams Post Office Box 1535 Richmond, Virginia 23213 Mr. Robert F. Saunders, Manager Surry Power Station Post Office Box 315 Surry, Virginia 23883 Resident Inspector Surry Power Station U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Co1T111ission Post Office Box 166, Route 1 Surry, Virginia 23883 Mr. Sherlock Holmes, Chairman Board of Supervisors of Surry County Surry County Courthouse Surry, Virginia 23683 W. T. Lough Virginia Corporation Commission Division-of Energy Regulation Post Office Box 1197
\\
Richmond, Virginia 23209 Mr. J. T. Rhodes Senior Vice President - Power Ops.
Virginia Electric and Power Company Post Office Rox 26666 Richmond, Virginia 23261 Regional Administrator, Region II U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Conmission 101 Marietta Street, Suite 3100 Atlanta, Georgia 30323
,lames B. Kenley, M.D., Co1T111issioner Department of Health 109 Governor Street Richmond, Virginia 23219 Surry Power Station Attorney General Supreme Court Building 101 North Rth Street Richmond, Virginia 23219