ML18149A366
| ML18149A366 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Surry  |
| Issue date: | 10/14/1986 |
| From: | Walker R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18149A365 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-281-86-20, NUDOCS 8610220002 | |
| Download: ML18149A366 (2) | |
Text
.ENCLOSURE 1 NOTICE OF VIOLATION Virginia Electric and Power Company Surry Unit 2 Docket No. 50-281 License No. DPR-37 During the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) inspection conducted on
- August 3 - September 6, 1986, a violation of NRC requirements was identified.
The violation involved failure to provide detailed instructions in maintenance procedures for corrective maintenance of safety-related equipment.
In accordance with the 11General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions, 11 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1986), the violation is listed below:
Technical Specification 6.4.A requires that detailed written procedures with appropriate check-off lists and instructions shall be provided for
- preventative or corrective maintenance operations which would have an effect on the safety of the reactor. Maintenance procedures MP-C-RS-043, 11Corrective Maintenance* Procedure for Recirculating Spray Heat Exchanger
- Repairs, 11 and MMP-C-G-102, 11Corrective Maintenance Procedure for Expansion Joints in General, 11 provide instructions for the repair of leaking tubes in the heat exchanger and removal of expansion joints on the service water side of the heat exchanger to allow tube plugging, respectively.
Contrary to the above, in the instances cited below, maintenance procedures used for the repair of Unit 2 Recirculation Spray Heat Exchanger 118 11 during the period of July 23-27, 1986,. lacked detailed instructions, were not fully followed, and consequently did not provide adequate documentation to show that the work associated with the repair of a safety-related component was accomplished in a quality manner.
- 1.
Maintenance procedure MP-C-RS-043 lacked sufficient details for performing the work and did not provide adequate documentation to show that proper equipment and controls were used for pressure.testing of the heat exchanger, that proper system retesting had been accomplished, and that the system was properly restored.
- 2.
Maintenance procedure MMP-C-G-102, did not pro vi d~
- adequate documentation to show that inspection for foreign objects and debris in the heat exchangers was verified and that proper system retesting had be~n accomplished.
This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement 1), and applies to Unit 2.
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Virginia Electric and Power Company
- is hereby requ_ired to submit to this Office within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice a written statement or explanation in reply including (for *each violation):
(1) admission or denial of the violation,
(
I
Virginia Electric and Power Company Surry Unit 2 2
Docket No. 50-281 License No. DPR-37 (2) the reason for the ~iolation if admitted, (3) the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved, (4) the corrective steps which will be taken
- to avoid further violations, and (5) the date when full compliance will be achieved.
Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.
Security or safeguards information should be submitted as an enclosure to facilitate withholding it from public disclosure as required by 10 CFR 2.790(d) or 10 CFR 73.21.
Dated at Atlanta, Georgia this f'i-& day of October 1986 FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Original Signed by Luis A. Reyes
/for Roger D. Walker, Directo~
Division of Reactor Projects