ML18149A109
| ML18149A109 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Surry  |
| Issue date: | 03/27/1986 |
| From: | Jape F, Vandyne K NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18149A107 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-280-86-05, 50-280-86-5, 50-281-86-05, 50-281-86-5, NUDOCS 8604220347 | |
| Download: ML18149A109 (5) | |
See also: IR 05000280/1986005
Text
~p.R REGc,<'.
UNITED STATES
~e,'-
"'1>-o
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
/~1>.,_
REGION II
ti
- -
g
101 MARIETTA STREET, N.W.
\\ii ~:
/:' 1
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30323
~~
"r:;
'("_,,1-'.
1*
0~
/)
,,.
- ..
Report Nos.:
50-280/86-05 and 50-281/86-05
Licensee:
Virginia Electric and Power Company
Richmond, VA
23261
Docket Nos.:
50-280 and 50-281
License Nos.:
Facility Name:
Surry 1 and 2
Inspection Conducted:
February 24-28, 1986
Ins~ VanDyne ~
~e
Approved by:
?!~
F. Jape, Section Chief, Te
Engineering Branch
Division of Reactor Safety
SUMMARY
-3/.i-'ia
ba'te Signed
IP7//6
Date Signed
Scope:
This routine, unannounced inspection entailed 38 inspector-hours in the
areas of containment isolation valve testing, snubber surveillance program, and
followup of previously identified inspection findings.
Results:
One violation was identified - Failure to* follow procedures for
control of testing and review of test results (paragraph 7) .
,..------- - --- -
- ----- --
8604220347 860408
ADOCK 05000280
G
REPORT DETAILS
1.
Persons Contacted
Licensee Employees
- D. L. Benson, Assistant Station Manager
- P. f. Blount Assistant Supervisor,-Health Physics
- R. H. Blount, Surveillance and Test Supervisor
W. Craft, Licensing Coordinator
- R. F. Driscoll, Quality Assurance Manager
- D. J. Fortin, Corporate Office
- B. A. Garber, Virginia Power, Surry
- E. S. Grecheck, Virginia Power, Surry
- W. D. Grady, Quality Assurance Supervisor
- H. L. Miller, Assistant Station Manger
- S. P. Sarver, Health Physics Superintendent
- R. F. Saunders, Station Manager
E. Turko, Surveillance Test Engineer
D. Valdivieso, Surveillance Test Engineer
D. Wong, Surveillance Test Engineer
Other licensee employees contacted included engineers, technicians,
operators, and office personnel.
NRC Resident Inspectors
- D. Burke
- M. Davis
- W. B. Gloersen, Radiation Specialist, NRC - Region II
- Attended exit interview
2.
Exit Interview
The inspection scope and findings were summarized on February 28, 1986, with
those persons indicated in paragraph 1 above.
The inspector described the
areas inspected and discussed in detail the inspection findings.
No
dissenting comments were received from the licensee.
Violation 50-280, 281/86-05~01,
Failure to follow procedures for control
of testing and review of test results (paragraph 7).
The licensee did not identify as proprietary any of the materials provided
to or reviewed by the inspector during this inspection.
'?,.
2
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Enforcement Matters
a.
(Closed) Violation 281/85-11-01, which concerns a failure to follow
requirements of 10 CFR 50 Appendix J during CILRT.
The inspector
reviewed the licensee's corrective action specified in their response
dated July 1985.
The corrective action has* been completed satis-
factorily.
b.
(Closed) Unresolved Item 281/85-11-04, which concerns the location and
repair of secondary system leakage during the performance of CILRT.
This item is closed based on the most recent performance of the Unit 2
CILRT as detailed in Report 280, 281/85-20.
c.
(Closed) Violation 281/83-30-01, the inspector reviewed the licensee's
response.
Based on satisfactory completion of the corrective action as
specified in the response, this item is closed.
d.
(Closed) Unresolved item 281/80-39-01
e.
(Closed) Unresolved item 281/80-39-02
f.
(Closed) Unresolved item 281/80-30-05
The above three items are no longer considered to be technically viable and
are, therefore, closed.
4.
Unresolved Items
Unresolved item were not identified during the inspection.
5.
Snubber Surveillance Program (61729)
The inspector reviewed the licensee's snubber visual inspection program for
both Units.
The following procedure results were reviewed:
a.
Visual Inspection Accessible (As left)
b.
PT 398-1, Visual Inspection Accessible (As found)
c.
PT 39A-2, Visual Inspection Inaccessible (As left)
d.
PT 398-2, Visual Inspection Inaccessible (As found)
3
These tests were reviewed to verify the following:
Test results were adequately evaluated
Proper review, evaluation, and acceptance of test results were
accomplished
Acceptance criteria was met
In addition, the inspector reviewed Administrative Procedure (ADM) 89.14
and Technical Specifications 4.17 and 3.20 to ensure that testing was
conducted in accordance with administrative guidelines and with the required
frequency as specified by the Technical Specifications.
No violations or deviations were identified in the areas inspected.
6.
Followup of Previously Identified Inspection Findings (92701)
a.
(Open) Inspector Followup Item 280/85-20-01, which concerned a conflict
between Technical Specification and ANSI N45.4.
The licensee has
committed to clarify this ambiguity .in the form of a Technical
Specification Revision prior to the next ILRT.
b.
(Open) Inspector Followup Item 280/85-20-02, concerning computational
problems encountered during leak rate determination.
The licensee
committed to correct these deficiencies before the hext ILRT.
c.
(Closed) Inspector Followup Item 281/80-39-03
d.
(Closed) Inspector Followup Item 281/83-30-03
. The above two items are not longer considered to be technically viable and
are, therefore, closed.
7.
Containment Integrated Leak Rate Test (61720)
The inspector reviewed test procedure results for the performance of
selected Type B and C leak rate tests on Units 1 and 2.
To ensure the
adequacy of the leak rate testing the following items were reviewed:
Testing was conducted in accordance with approved procedures.
All test prerequisites were met.
All data were collected for final analysis.
All test results indicated preliminary acceptance criteria were met or
properly documented.
Testing was conducted within the frequency interval as specified by
Technical Specifications.
._,,. __ 1:.
., ..,.1 I(,.., ..
~
~
,; . ,,
...
4
a.
Six periodic tests (PTs) had completed final technical and administrative
plant reviews and were held in the document control vault. Subsequent
review of these PTs by the inspector revealed that three of the six proce-
dures, 1-PT-16.5, performed February 5, 1986; 1-PT-16.6, performed
January 29, 1986; 2-PT-16.6, performed January 28, 1986; were incomplete in
that sign-offs requiring leak rate data compilation in another procedure,
PT 16.11, were not signed.
In addition, the action required by the step had
not been performed.
When informed of these discrepancies licensee personnel
entered the vault and signed for the omitted steps. These actions do not
comply with ADM 89, Test Control.
The tnspector informed the licensee that
failure to comply with ADM 89 is a violation of Technical Specifications 6.4.A.2 and 6.4.D.
b.
One PT, (1-PT-16.6 for Unit 1), had not been performed within frequency
interval as specified by Technical Specifications.
This test was due
November 9, 1985 and could have been performed as late as December 26,
1985, but was not accomplished until January 29, 1986.
When licensee
personnel were made aware of this concern a plant deviation was initiated
for licensee followup and resolution.
Items a. and b.
1 isted above are identified as Violation 280,
281/86-05-01, Failure to follow procedures for control of testing and
review of test results.
No other violations or deviations were identified in the area inspected.