ML18142A555
| ML18142A555 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Surry  |
| Issue date: | 06/19/1985 |
| From: | Brownlee V NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | Stewart W VIRGINIA POWER (VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO.) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8507110281 | |
| Download: ML18142A555 (61) | |
Text
a, JUN 19 1985 Virginia Electric and Power Company ATTN:
Mr. W. L. Stewart, Vice President Nuclear Operations P. 0. Box 26666 Richmond, VA 23261 Gentlemen:
SUBJECT:
SLIDES FROM SYSTEMATIC ASSESSMENT OF LICENSEE PERFORMANCE PRESENTATION Enclosed are copies of the slides used during the subject presentation given at your corporate headquarters in Richmond, Virginia, on May 17, 1985.
You verbally requested these at the conclusion of the presentation.
Enclosure:
Surry SALP Slides cc w/encl:
R. J. Hardwick, Jr., Manager Nuclear Programs and Licensing E. H. Harrell, Station Manager -
North Anna R. F. Saunders, Station Manager - Surry Sincerely, ORIGINAL SIGNED BY HUGH C Dr'\\t--.!CE Virgil L. Brownlee, Chief Reactor Projects Branch 2 Division of Reactor Projects bee: NRC Resident Inspectors~ North Anna and Surry*
Document Control Desk Commonwealth of Virginia RII
\\f'/')
SAElrod:jd 6/,"i' /85
(
8507110281 850619--~l PDR ADOCK 05000280 G
PDR.
SURRY OVERALL EVALUATION
- 1.
STRENGTHS WERE IDENTIFIED IN THE AREAS OF RADIOLOGICAL CONTROLS. REFUELING.
SECURITY. AND LICENSING ACTIVITIES.
- 2.
A WEAKNESS WAS IDENTIFIED IN THE SURVEILLANCE AREA INVOLVING THE CONTROL AND IMPLEMENTATION OF REVISIONS AND AMENDMENTS TO THE SURVEILLANCE PROGRAMS.
SURVEILLANCE PROGRAMS. ONCE ESTABLISHED. FUNCTIONED REASONABLY WELL.
- 3.
THE GROWING MANAGEMENT EMPHASIS ON A REDUCTION IN PLANT TRIPS IS A FACTOR IN THE OBSERVED IMPROVEMENTS.
- 4.
THE SITE IS WELL MANAGED.
WITH A PROFESSIONAL AND KNOWLEDGEABLE STAFF.
J, NORTH ANNA
/
OVERALL EVALUATION
- 1.
STRENGTHS WERE IDENTIFIED IN THE AREAS OF REFUELING, SECURITY, AND RADIOLOGICAL CONTROLS.
- 2.
THE FACILITY WAS WELL MANAGED, WITH A PROFESSIONAL AND KNOWLEDGEABLE STAFF.
- 3.
PROGRAMMATIC GAINS HAVE BEEN MADE IN TRAINING, ALTHOUGH SHORT TERM PROBLEMS STILL OCCUR.
- 4.
ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE CHANGES HAVE STRENGTHENED SITE OPERATIONS, ALTHOUGH SHORT TERM PROBLEMS EXIST IN THIS AREA ALSO.
SURRY AREAS NOT RATED FIRE PROTECTION
J' SURRY CATECORY 3 AREAS (TREND)
- 1.
SURVEILLANCE CI MPROV I NG)
I'
_,J SURRY C/1 TECORY 2 /IRE/IS (TREND)
- 1.
PLANT OPERATIONS
<IMPROVING)
- 2.
MAINTENANCE
<IMPROVING)
- 3.
EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS (CONSTANT)
- 4.
TRAINING
<IMPROVING)
- 5.
QUALITY PROGRAMS (CONSTANT)
,J SURRY CATECORY 1 AREAS (TREND)
- 1.
RADIOLOGICAL CONTROLS CI MPROV I NG)
- 2.
SECURITY (CONSTANT)
- 3.
REFUELING CNOT DE TERM I NED)
- 4.
LICENSING ACTIVITIES
<CONSTANT)
e NORTH ANNA CATECORY 2 AREAS (TREND)
- 1.
PLANT OPERATIONS
<IMPROVING)
- 2.
MAINTENANCE (IMPROVING)
- 3.
SURVEILLANCE (CONSTANT)
- 4.
FIRE PROTECTION
<CONSTANT)
- 5.
<IMPROVING)
- 6.
TRAINING
<IMPROVING)
- 7.
QUALITY PROGRAMS
<IMPROVING)
- 8.
LICENSING ACTIVITIES
<IMPROVING)
....1.
NORTH ANNA CATECORY 1 AREAS (TREND)
- 1.
RADIOLOGICAL CONTROLS (CONST ANT) 2a SECURITY (CONST ANT)
- 3.
REFUEL I NG CNOT DE TERM I NED)
AVERAGE TRIP RATE PER CRITICAL YEAR COUNTRY <TYPE)
PERIOD
- u. s.
(PWR) 1983
.- FRANCE (PWR) 1982 SWEDEN
<PWR) 1983 GERMANY (PWR) 1983 JAPAN (PWR) 1982
- u. s.
<BWR) 1983 SWEDEN
<BWR) 1983 GERMANY
<BWR) 1983
.JAPAN
<BWR) 1982 RATE I
- 10. s 1
- 14. 3
- 9. 2
- 2.0 0.6 8.5 5.3
- 3. 2,
~- 61 e
e
AVERAGE TRIP RATE PER CRITICAL YEAR PLANT/TYPE RATE WESTINGHOUSE
- 13. 1 EARLY WESTINGHOUSE 1.2 B & W 3.9 CE 7.9 NORTH ANNA 1 7.8 NORTH ANNA 2 2.7 SURRY 1 12.5 SURRY 2 9.7
35 7 (R LESS ALLEGATllWS
\\ ~
YEPCO 25
~
28 REGlll 11 SITES E7Z71 15 11 5
r tUIER lf AI..LEGA TIIIS Al Cl Gl ALLEGATIONS PER SITE Bl SEPTEJIER 1983 - FEIRJARY 1985 82 SITE Fl 83 CZ 01. El. E2 A4 7 SITES e
31 REGlll 11 A~
~
25 YEPCO
~
28 REGlll 11 UTILITIES 15 El I II UJ s
I A
B C
ALLEGATIONS PER UTILITY D
SEPTB&R 15113 - FEIRJARY 15115 E
F UTILITY G
H I
J REG Ii AVE
CATEIDY 1
[YYYl CATEIDY 2
~..............
CATEIDY 3
- I *I *I *I *I *I *I 1*1*1,.* ***
18 8
8 2
I tll&R If FACILMES BER. PREP.
rUNCTIONAL AREA COMPARISON SEClRITY CfERATl[H; REFlE.ItE RICTIIIW. AREAS LICENSitE el
CATEQRY 1
[WY]
CATEGIRY 2 CATEGIRY 3 11 8
8 2
8 FUNCTIONAL AREA COMPARISON IPERATill6 tllllR IF FACILITIES IFERATill6 RAO. PROT.
NAINT.
SlRV.
FIRE PROT.
FllCTIIIW. AREAS
SURRY LERs SEPTE&R 1983 - FEIRJARY 11115 l:ESil14 (5. 2%)
e OTI£R C16. 7%>
C(H;T /FAB/INSTAL C3. 11>
PERS(JfE_ (45. 8%)
atm./FAB.
IR INSTAL..
', ~
OTIER FZZZI COAIENT FAIUIE tUIER (f LERe 51 UJ I
SURRY LERs SEPTBIIR 1983 - FEIRIARY 1985 LNIT 1 LNIT 2
NORTH ANNA LERs SEPTBIER 1983 - FEIRJARY 1985 ctlfll£NT FAIUIE <S2. 6%)
aJ6T /FAB/INSTAL <2. 6%>
IESI~ Cl.31>
OTI£R C12. 8%)
PERSOIE. C3ll. 8%)
. r NORTH ANNA LERs SEPTE&R 1E - FEIRJARY 1985 tU&R IF lERe 68 mm.IF#&
(R INSTAI..
58 CESI~
~
ODER FSZ\\ZS(j P89lfE.
EiZil alAIINT 11.
FAIUIE I
I I.JUT 1 llUT 2
\\
LERs PER PLANT TYPE SEP1BIER 1983 - FEIRJARY 1985 tUID IF l.ERe SI e
411 31 28 e
11 I
NAn. AVF..
CE B&V VEST.
1..
{
e VIOLATION
SUMMARY
OPERATING REACTORS SEPTENBER 1983 - FEBRUARY 1985 I
NORTH ANNA 1 0
NORTH ANNA 2 0
SURRY 1 0
SURRY 2 0
REGION II AVERAGE 0
I I 0
0 0
0 0
III IV V
1 19 2
2 19 2
2 14 5
2 14 8
2 23 10
YEPCO 71
~
REGI~ II BB SITES E/ /71 58 21 11 I
OPERATIONS PHASE VIOLATIONS/SITE/UNIT SEPTBIER 1983 - FEIRJARY 1985 tlNER IF VICUTI(l6 Al Cl El Bl Fl Dl.F2 GI SITE HI
- 11. I2. Jl E2. F3 C2 e
e
75 REGim. II AVERAGE
~
61 VEPCO
~
45 REGim. II UTILITIES El I II 15 OPERATIONS PHASE VIOLATIONS/UTILITY/SITE SEPTE&R 1993 - FEIRJARY 1985 tlllER (F Vl(UTJIMS A
B C
D I
E F
UTILITY G
H I
J AEG II AVf.
e
l L_
e
- e EVALUATION CRITERIA
- 1.
MANAGEMENT INVOLVEMENT IN ASSURING QUALITY
- 2.
APPROACH TO RESOLUTION OF TECHNICAL ISSUES FROM THE SAFETY STANDPOINT
- 3.
RESPONSIVENESS TO NRC INITIATIVES
- 4.
ENFORCEMENT HISTORY
- 5.
REPORTING AND ANALYSIS OF REPORTABLE EVENTS
- 6.
STAFFING <INCLUDING MANAGE-MENT)
- 7.
TRAINING EFFECTIVENESS AND QUALIFICATION
TREND IMPROVING:
LICENSEE PERFORMANCE HAS GENERALLY IMPROVED OVER THE COURSE OF THE SALP ASSESSMENT PERIOD CONSTANT:
LICENSEE PERFORMANCE HAS REMAINED ESSENTIALLY CONSTANT OVER THE COURSE OF THE SALP
- ASSESSMENT PERIOD DECLINING:
LICENSEE PERFORMANCE HAS GENERALLY DECLINED OVER THE COURSE OF. THE SALP ASSESSMENT PERIOD
AREA PERFORMANCE CATEGORY 3 BOTH NRC AND LICENSEE ATTENTION SHOULD BE INCREASED. LICENSEE MANAGEMENT ATTENTION OR INVOLVE-MENT IS ACCEPTABLE AND CONSIDERS NUCLEAR SAFETY. BUT WEAKNESSES ARE EVIDENT; LICENSEE RESOURCES APPEAR TO BE STRAINED OR NOT EFFECTIVELY USED SUCH THAT MINIMALLY-SATISFACTORY.PERFORMANCE WITH RESPECT TO OPERATIONAL SAFETY OR CONSTRUCTION IS BEING ACHIEVED.
e AREA PERFORMAN.CE CATECORY 2 NRC ATTENTION SHOULD BE MAIN-TAINED AT NORMAL LEVELS. LICENSEE MANAGEMENT ATTENTION AND INVOLVE-MENT ARE EVIDENT AND ARE CONCERNED WITH NUCLEAR SAFETY; LICENSEE RESOURCES ARE ADEQUATE AND ARE REASONABLY EFFECTIVE SUCH THAT SATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE WITH RESPECT TO OPERATIONAL SAFETY OR CONSTRUCTION IS BEING ACHIEVED.
I f,_
J, e
AREA PERFORMANCE CATEGORY 1 REDUCED NRC ATTENTION -MAY BE APPROPRIATE. LICENSEE MANAGEMENT ATTENTION-AND INVOLVEMENT ARE AGGRESSIVE AND ORIENTED TOWARD NUCLEAR SAFETY; LICENSEE RESOURCES 1
- ARE AMPLE AND EFFECTIVELY USED SUCH THAT A HIGH LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE WITH RESPECT TO OPERATIONAL SAFETY OR CONSTRUCTION IS BEING ACHIEVED.
PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS AREAS FOR OPERATING REACTORS
- 1.
PLANT OPERATIONS
- 2.
RADIOLOGICAL CONTROLS
- 3.
MAINTENANCE
- 4.
SURVEILLANCE
- 5.
FIRE PROTECTION
- 6.
- 7.
SECURITY
- 8.
REFUELING
- 9.
QUALITY PROGRAMS AND ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS AFFECTING QUALITY
- 10.
LICENSING ACTIVITIES
- 11.
TRAINING
r CATBDY 1 CATBDY 2
- 4 CATEIDY 3
- I t
- I
- I
- I
- I
- I I
- t
- I I
- I I
- I 11 a
8 2
I tUID IF FACILITIES BER. PREP.
FUNCTIONAL AREA COMPARISON SEDRITY tfERATilltS RERE.Ifli FllCTICJW.. AREAS LICENSifli e
~
SURRY LERs SEPT9IIR 1983 - FEIRJARY 1985 r£SIGN <S. 2D OTI£R C18. 7%>
aNST /FAB/INSTAI. C3. 1%>
PERSMEl. (45. 8%)
mm.lFAB.
(R INSTAL.
FZZZI CIIAl£NT FAIUIE tlJ&R CF lERe SI II SURRY LERs SEPTEMIR 1983 - FE1RJARY l98S I.JUT 1 llUT 2
NORTH ANNA LERs SEPTBIER 1983 - FEIRJARY 1985 aJAJ£NT FAIUI( CS2. 8%>
C06T /FAB/INSTAL C2. 6%>
[ISi~ Cl. 3%)
-.,......... ~ - --------* ----*-*--- -------****- -****. -**... _" __. __ -*.. - -*- *-**** -..... -~-**---.......
. -*-'... --**... -~.,.,,..
1 NORTH ANNA LERs SEPTE&R 1983 - FEIRJARY 1985 tllllR (f L.ERe 61 al61'./F~
~ INSTAL 51 IESI~
wmxsa 01lER tYSZ\\(j PERSOIE..
EiZil aJfHNT 11 I
FAIUIE I
.. I LERs PER PLANT TYPE SEPTEJIER 1993 - FEIRJARY 1985 SI e,
11 I
NATI.. AVf..
CE B & V VEST.
r VIOLATION
SUMMARY
OPERATING REACTORS SEPTENBER 1983 - FEBRUARY 1985 I
NORTH ANNA 1 0
NORTH ANNA 2 0
SURRY 1 0
SURRY 2 0
REGION II AVERAGE 0
I I 0
0 0
0 0
III IV V
1 19 2
2 19 2
2 14
,5 2
14 8
2 23 10 J
YEPCO 71
~
REClllf II Ill SITES E///1 51 21 11 I
OPERATIONS PHASE VIOLATIONS/SITE/UNIT SEPlE&R 1983 - FEIRJARY 1985 tU&R (F YICUTJOO At Ct Et 91 Fl 01, F2 GI Ht 11, 12. JI E2. F3 C2 SITE
REGI~ II AVERAGE YEPCO REGI~ II UTILITIES f///1 75 45 15 OPERATIONS PHASE VIOLATIONS/UTILITY/SITE SEPTEJ&R 1983 - FEIRJARY 1995 PU&R CF Vl(UTl(J6 A
B C
D E
F UTILITY G
H I
J RE& II AVE
I EVALUATION CRITERIA
- 1.
MANAGEMENT INVOLVEMENT IN ASSURING QUALITY
- 2.
APPROACH TO RESOLUTION OF TECHNICAL ISSUES FROM THE SAFETY STANDPOINT
- 3.
RESPONSIVENESS TO NRC INITIATIVES
- 4.
ENFORCEMENT HISTORY
- 5.
REPORTING AND ANALYSIS OF REPORTABLE EVENTS
- 6.
STAFFING <INCLUDING MANAGE-MENT)
- 7.
TRAINING EFFECTIVENESS AND QUALIFICATION.
TREND IMPROVING:
LICENSEE PERFORMANCE HAS GENERALLY IMPROVED OVER THE COURSE OF THE SALP ASSESSMENT PERIOD CONSTANT:
LICENSEE PERFORMANCE HAS REMAINED ESSENTIALLY CONSTANT OVER THE COURSE OF THE SALP ASSESSMENT PERIOD DECLINING:
LICENSEE PERFORMANCE HAS GENERALLY DECLINED OVER THE COURSE OF THE SALP ASSESSMENT PERIOD
AREA PERFORMANCE CATEGORY 3
- BOTH NRC AND LICENSEE ATTENTION SHOULD BE INCREASED. LICENSEE MANAGEMENT ATTENTION OR INVOLVE~
MENTIS ACCEPTABLE AND CONSIDERS NUCLEAR SAFETY. BUT WEAKNESSES ARE EVIDENT; LICENSEE RESOURCES APPEAR TO BE STRAINED OR NOT EFFECTIVELY USED SUCH THAT MINIMALLY SATISFACTORY.PERFORMANCE WITH RESPECT TO OPERATIONAL SAFETY OR CONSTRUCTION IS BEING ACHIEVED.
AREA PERFORMANCE CATECORY 2 NRC ATTENTION SHOULD BE MAIN-TAINED AT NORMAL LEVELS. LICENSEE MANAGEMENT ATTENTION AND INVOLVE-MENT ARE EVIDENT AND ARE CONCERNED WITH NUCLEAR SAFETY; LICENSEE RESOURCES ARE ADEQUATE AND ARE REASONABLY EFFECTIVE SUCH THAT SATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE WITH RESPECT TO OPERATIONAL
. SAFETY OR CONSTRUCT I ON IS BE I NG ACHIEVED.
-~
AREA PERFORMANCE -
CATEGORY 1 REDUCED NRC ATTENTION MAY BE APPROPRIATE. LICENSEE MANAGEMENT ATTENTION AND 1NVOLVEMENT ARE AGGRESSIVE AND ORIENTED TOWARD NUCLEAR SAFETY; LICENSEE RESOURCES ARE AMPLE AND EFFECTIVELY USED*
SUCH THAT A HIGH LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE WITH RESPECT TO OPERATIONAL SAFETY OR CONSTRUCTION IS BEING ACHIEVED.
=~---------------
L
PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS AREAS FOR OPERATING REACTORS
- 1.
PLANT OPERATIONS
- 2.
RADIOLOGICAL CONTROLS
- 3.
MAINTENANCE
- 4.
SURVEILLANCE
- 5.
FI RE PROTECT I ON
- 6.
- 7.
SECURITY
- 8.
REFUEL I NG
- 9.
QUALITY PROGRAMS AND ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS AFFECTING QUALITY
- 10.
LICENSING ACTIVITIES
- 11.
TRAINING
SALP PROGRAM OBJECTIVES
- 1.
IMPROVE LICENSEE PERFORMANCE
- 2. PROVIDE A-BASIS FOR ALLOCATION OF NRC RESOURCES
- 3. IMPROVE NRC REGULATORY PROGRAM
L UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION SYSTEMATIC ASSESSMENT OF LICENSEE PERFORMANCE
<SALP)
. ' 1
- ~
SALP PROGRAM OBJECTIVES
- 1. IMPROVE LICENSEE PERFORMANCE
- 2. PROVIDE=A BASIS FOR ALLOCATION OF NRC RESOURCES
- 3. IMPROVE NRC REGULATORY PROGRAM
~
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION SYSTEMATIC ASSESSMENT OF I
LICEN.. SEE PERFORMANCE
<SALP) 1 *......
e
l r
~
e SURRY OVERALL EVALUATION
- 1.
STRENGTHS WERE IDENTIFIED IN THE AREAS OF RADIOLOGICAL CONTROLS. REFUELING.
SECURITY. AND LICENSING ACTIVITIES.
- 2.
A WEAKNESS WAS IDENTIFIED IN THE SURVEILLANCE AREA INVOLVING THE
- CONTROL AND IMPLEMENTATION OF REVISIONS AND AMENDMENTS TO THE SURVEILLANCE PROGRAMS.
SURVEILLANCE PROGRAMS.
ONCE ESTABLISHED. FUNCTIONED REASONABLY WELL.
- 3.
THE GROWING MANAGEMENT EMPHASIS ON A REDUCTION IN PLANT TRIPS IS A FACTOR IN THE OBSERVED IMPROVEMENTS.
- 4.
THE SITE IS WELL MANAGED. WITH A PROFESSIONAL AND KNOWLEDGEABLE STAFF.
1 V
e NORTH ANNA OVERALL EVALUATION
- 1.
STRENGTHS WERE IDENTIFIED IN THE AREAS OF REFUELING, SECURITY. AND RADIOLOGICAL CONTROLS.
- 2.
THE FACILITY WAS WELL MANAGED, WITH A PROFESSIONAL AND KNOWLEDGEABLE STAFF.
- 3.
PROGRAMMATIC GAINS HAVE BEEN MADE IN TRAINING. ALTHOUGH SHORT TERM PROBLEMS STILL OCCUR.
- 4.
ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE CHANGES HAVE STRENGTHENED SITE OPERATIONS. ALTHOUGH SHORT TERM PROBLEMS EXIST IN THIS AREA ALSO.
r.
t t. _:
f I'.:.'
~f
.i
-~
-.. i i
'r:
'1
~
t.
r
e SURRY AREAS NOT RATED FIRE PROTECTION
SURRY CATECORY 3 ARE/IS (TREND)
- 1.
SURVEILLANCE CI MPROV I NG)
r,*
I e
SURRY C/ITECORY 2 AREAS (TRENOJ
- 1.
PLANT OPERATIONS
<IMPROVING)
- 2.
MAINTENANCE
<IMPROVING)
- 3.
<CONSTANT)
- 4.
TRAINING
<IMPROVING)
- 5.
QUALITY PROGRAMS (CONSTANT) j
ll
.e SURRY CATECORY 1 AREAS (TREND)
- 1.
RADIOLOGICAL CONTROLS CI MPROV I NG)
- 2.
SECURITY CCONST ANT)
- 3.
REFUELING (NOT DETERMINED)
- 4.
LICENSING ACTIVITIES (CONSTANT)
NORTH ANNA CATECORY 2 AREAS (TREND)
- 1.
PLANT OPERATIONS
<IMPROVING)
- 2.
MAINTENANCE
<IMPROVING)
- 3.
SURVEILLANCE (CONSTANT)
- 4.
FIRE PROTECTION (CONSTANT)
- 5.
<IMPROVING)
- 6.
TRAINING
<IMPROVING)
- 7.
QUALITY PROGRAMS
<IMPROVING)
- 8.
LICENSING ACTIVITIES
<IMPROVING)
41 NORTH ANNA CATECORY 1 AREAS (TREND)
- 1.
RADIOLOGICAL CONTROLS (CONST ANT)
- 2.
SECURITY (CONST ANT)
- 3.
REFUEL I NG CNOT DETERMINED)
AVERAGE TRIP RATE PER CR I T'I CAL YEAR COUNTRY <TYPE)
- u. s.
CPWR)
FRANCE CPWR)
SWEDEN CPWR)
I GERMANY (PWR)
JAPAN CPWR)
- u. s.
CBWR)
SWEDEN CBWR)
GERMANY (BWR)
JAPAN
<BWR)
PERIOD 1983 1982 1983 1983 1982 1983 1983 1983 1982
\\
r t
RATE!*
I I
I 10.5
- 14. 3
- 9. 2:
2.0 0.6 e 8.5 5.3
- 3. 2,
.~
AVERAGE TRIP RATE PER CRITICAL YEAR PLANT/TYPE RA TE WESTINGHOUSE
- 13. 1 EARLY WESTINGHOUSE 1.2 GE 8.5 8 & W 3.9 CE 7.9 NORTH ANNA 1 7.8 NORTH ANNA 2 2.7 SURRY 1 12.5 SURRY 2 9.7
1--- --
35 7 IR LESS AUEGATill6
~
YEPCO 25
~
21 REGIIJt II SITES E77 II 15 11 5
I tulER (F AU.EGATill6 Al Cl GI ALLEGATIONS PER SITE 81 SEPTE&R 1983 - FEIRJARY 1985 82 SITE F1 83 C2. DI, El, E2 M
7 SITES e
tulD (F N..LECATIIJ6 311 161(1 II AYEIWI
- ~
~
21 161mt II UTILITIES 15 E/ / /I 11 5
I A
B C
ALLEGATIONS PER UTILITY D
SEPTEJIIR 1983 - FEIRJARY 19115.
E F
UTILITY G
H
\\*
I J
16 II AYE
CA'JEIDY 1
[WY]
CATBDY 2
- .4 CATBDY 3 tU&R IF FACILITIES 11 e
8 2
l1 (PERATl(H; FUNCTIONAL AREA COMPARISON lPERATI(H; e
RAD. PROT.
NAINT.
UY.
FIRE PROT.