ML18142A399
| ML18142A399 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Surry  |
| Issue date: | 05/03/1985 |
| From: | Varga S Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Stewart W VIRGINIA POWER (VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO.) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18142A400 | List: |
| References | |
| GL-83-28, NUDOCS 8505140373 | |
| Download: ML18142A399 (4) | |
Text
Docket Nos. 50-280 and 50-281 Mr. W. L. Stewart May 3, 1985 Vice President - Nuclear Operations Virginia Electric and Power Company Post Office Box 26666 Richmond, Virginia 23261
Dear Mr. Stewart:
Distribution NRC PDR ORB#l RDG HThompson EJordan JPartlow CParrish
SUBJECT:
DRAFT TECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT (TER) FOR SALEM ATWS ITEM 1.2 (GENERIC LETTER 83-28)
Docket file L PDR Gray file OELD BGrimes DNeighbors ACRS (10)
The staff has completed a preliminary review to assess the completeness and adequacy of licensee responses to Generic Letter 83-28 Item 1.2.
For the Surry Power Station, your response was found to be incomplete in two of the areas evaluated.
The enclosed TER provides a tec~nical evaluation representing the staff's initial judgment of the areas evaluated.
Pen and ink changes have been made to the TER to make the wording consistent with our approach.
In order to preserve our present review schedule, we would appreciate your cooperation in obtaining additional information that will permit us to complete our review.
It would appear that the needed information on your facility could be obtained by telephone conference (with subsequent supporting documentation) within one week of your receipt of the DRAFT TER.
Your project manager will be working with you to arrange an acceptable time to conduct the necessary conference calls.
Enclosure:
Sincerely,
/s/SAVarga Steven A. Varga, Chief Operating Reactors Branch #1 Division of Licensing DRAFT TER on Salem ATWS Item 1. 2 cc w/enclosure:
See next page
- SEE PREVIOUS WHITE FOR CONCURRENCE ORB#l: DL
- CParrish 05/ 0]/85 ORB#l :DL*
DNeighbors/ts 05/ 01/85
- -~- -- - -----....
8505140373 850503 PDR ADOC~ 05000280 P
Docket Nos. 50-280 and 50-281 Mr. W. L. Stewart Vice President - Nuclear Operations Virginia Electric and Power Company Post Office Box 26666 Richmond, Virginia 23261
Dear Mr. Stewart:
Docket file L PDR Gray file OELD BGrimes DNeighbors ACRS (10)
SUBJECT:
DRAFT TECHNICAL EVALUAT N REPORT (TER) FOR SALEM ATWS ITEM 1.2 ( NERIC LETTER 83-28)
The staff has completed a pr iminary review to assess the completeness and adequacy of licensee respon es to Generic Letter 83-28 Item 1.2.
For the Surry Power Station, your esponse was found to be incomplete in two of the areas evaluated.
The enclosed TER provi es a technical evaluation representing the*staff 1s initial judgment of e areas evaluated.
Pen and ink changes have been made to the TER to ake the wording consistent with our approach.
In order to prese ve our present review schedule, we would appreciate your cooperation in a taining additional information that will permit us to complete our r iew.
It would appear that the needed information on your facility coul be obtained by telephone conference within one week of your receipt oft e DRAFT TER.
Your project manager will be working with you to arrange an cceptable time to conduct the necessary conference calls.
Enclosure:
DRAFT TER on Salem ATWS Item 1. 2 cc w/enclosure:
See next page Sincerely, Steven A. Varga, Chief Operating Reactors Branch #1 Division of Licensing ORB#l:DL1 CParrish 05/l /85 O~L BC-ORB#l:DL ON b rs/ts SVarga 05/ /85 05/ /85
e UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 Docket Nos. 50-280 and 50-281 Mr. W. L. Stewart May 3, 1985 Vice President - Nuclear Operations Virginia Electric and Power Company Post Office Box 26666 Richmond, Virginia 23261
Dear Mr. Stewart:
SUBJECT:
DRAFT TECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT (TER) FOR SALEM ATWS ITEM 1.2 (GENERIC LETTER 83-28)
The staff has completed a preliminary review to assess the completeness and adequacy of licensee responses to Generic Letter 83-28 Item 1.2. For the Surry Power Station, your response was found to be incomplete in two of the areas evaluated.
The enclosed TER provides a technical evaluation representing the staff's initial judgment of the areas evaluated.
Pen and ink changes have been made to the TER to make the wording consistent with our approach.
In order to preserve our present review schedule, we would appreciate your cooperation in obtaining additional information that will permit us to complete our review.
It would appear that the needed information on your facility could be obtained by telephone conference (with subsequent supporting documentation) within one week of your receipt of the DRAFT TER.
Your project manager will be working with you to arrange an acceptable time to conduct the necessary conference calls.
Enclosure:
DRAFT TER on Salem ATWS Item 1. 2 cc w/enclosure:
See next page h #1
Mr. W. L. Stewart Virginia Electric and Power Company cc:
Mr. Michael W. Maupin Hunton and Williams Post Office Box 1535 Richmond, Virginia 23213 Mr. Robert F. Saunders, Manager Surry Power Station Post Office Box 315 Surry, Virginia 23883 Donald J, Burke, Resident Inspector Surry Power Station U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Post Office Box 166, Route 1 Surry, Virginia 23883 Mr. Sherlock Holmes, Chairman Board of Supervisors of Surry County Surry County Courthouse Surry, Virginia 23683 W. T. Lough Virginia Corporation Commission Division of Energy Regulation Post Office Box 1197 Richmond, Virginia 23209 Mr. J. H. Ferguson Executive Vice President - Power Virginia Electric and Power Company Post Office Box 26666 Richmond, Virginia 23261 Or. J. Nelson Grace Regional Administrator - Region II U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Conmission Suite 2900 101 Marietta Street, Suite 3100 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 James B. Kenley, M.D., Conmissioner Department of Health 109 Governor Street Richmond, Virginia 23219 Surry Power Station Attorney General Supreme Court Building 101 North 8th Street Richmond, Virginia 23219