ML18142A065
| ML18142A065 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Surry, North Anna, 05000000 |
| Issue date: | 09/26/1984 |
| From: | Thomas C Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Stewart W VIRGINIA POWER (VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO.) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18142A066 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8410100669 | |
| Download: ML18142A065 (4) | |
Text
e e
_
- UNiTED STATES
!\\IUCLE,t,.R REGULATORY COMf\\/iiSSlO[\\J
.:_'1, '\\.~~'
~~~=*:~)
11-!i~~:ll-
- ' ****4=.
\\\\i;'.sSHlr\\:GTCJN, D. C. 20555 Se~tember 26, 1984 Mr. W. L. Stewart, Vice President Virginia Electric and Power Company Richmond, Virginia 23261
Dear Mr. Stewart:
Subject:
Acceptance-for Referencing of Licensing Topical Report VEP-NFE-2 (P/NP),
11 Vepco Evaluation of the Control Rod Ejection Transient 11 We have completed our review of the ~ubject topical report submitted November 23, 1983 by Virginia Electric and Power Company letter No. 657.
We find thit this report d~scribes an acceptable method for analyzing the control rod ejection accipent in Vepco's Surry and-+l-erth Anna reactors and this method may be referenced in future Vepco license applications to the extent specified and under the limitations deJineated in the report and the associated NRC evaluation, which is enclosed.. The evaluation defines the bases for acceptance of the report.
We do not intend to repeat our review of the matters described in the report and found acceptable when the report appears as a reference in license applications, except to assure that the material presented is applicable to the specific plant involved.
Our acceptance applies only to the matters described in the report.
In accordance with procedures established in NUREG-0390, __ it is requested that Vepco publi~h accepted versions of this report, proprietary and non-proprietary, within three months of receipt of this letter. The accepted versions shall incorporate this letter and the enclosed evaluation between the title page and the abstract.
The accepted versions shall include an -A (designating ~ccepted) following the report identification symbol.
Should our-criteria or regulations change such that our conclusions as to the acceptabi i ity of the report 2.re inva 1 i dated, Vepco 1-1i 11 be expected to revise
.r--
8410100669 840926 PDR ADOCK 05000280 p
e e
Mr. W. September 26, 1984 and resubmit the respective documentation, or submit justification for the continued effective applicability of the topical report without revision of the respective documentation.
Enclosure:
As stated DISTRIBUTION:
Central
- File*
NRC PDR DCS SSPB R/F D. Moran R. Diggs L. Kopp.
Sincerely, Original *signed by Cecil 0. Thomas, Chief Standardization and Special Projects Branch Division of Licensing CP~df ~~:Jr-LKopp CUffif~~
1 /l6 /84 9/Z{/84
e UNITED STATES e
NUCLEAR "REGULATORY COMMISSION INASHINGTOr~. D. C. 20555 Mr. W. L. Stewart, Vice President Virginia Electric and Power Company Richmond, Virginia 23261
Dear Mr. Stewart:
Se~tember 26, 1984
Subject:
Accept~nce.for Referencing of Licensing Topical. Report VEP-NFE-2 (P/NP), "Vepco Evaluation of the Control Rod Ejection Transient" W~ have completed our review of the subject topical report submitted November 23, 1983 by Virginia Electric and Power Company letter No. 657.
We find that this report describes an acceptable method for analyzing the control rod ejection accident in Vepco 1s Surry and--U.Grth Anna reactors and this metH6d may be referenced in future Vepco license applications to the extent specified and under the limitations d.~lineated in the report and the associated NRC evaluation, which is enclosed.
The evaluation defines the bases for acceptance of the report.
We do not intend to repeat our review of the matters described in the report and found acceptable when the report appears as a referenc~ in license applicijtions~
except to assure that the material presented is applicable to the specific plant involved.
Our acceptance applies only to the matters described in the report
- In accordance with procedures established in NUREG-0390, it is requested that Vepco publish accepted versions of this report, proprietary and non-proprietary, within three months of receipt of this letter.
The accepted versions shall incorporate this letter and the enclosed evaluation between the title page and the abstract.
The accepted versions shall include an -A (designating accepted) following the report identification symbol.
Should our criteria or regulations change such.that our conclusions as to the acceptability of the report are invalidated, Vepco will be expected to revise
e
~r. W. September 26, 1984 and resubmit the respective documentation, or submit justification for the continued effective applicability of the topical report without revision of the respective documentation.
Enclosure:
As stated Sincerely, Cecil 0. Thomas, Chief Standardization and Special Projects Branch Division of Licensing