ML18139A895
| ML18139A895 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Surry  |
| Issue date: | 11/17/1980 |
| From: | Sylvia B VIRGINIA POWER (VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO.) |
| To: | James O'Reilly NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18139A894 | List: |
| References | |
| 875, NUDOCS 8012170021 | |
| Download: ML18139A895 (3) | |
Text
..
~.
e be,,
/1,, ~'-.
NOV 1 9 198G VI:RGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY RICHMOND, VIBGIN*IA 23261 November 17, 1980 Mr. James *p. P'Reilly*,-*.Dii*ector" Of£+/-ce_of-Inspec:tion and~Enforcement U.
- S.*
- Nuclear Regulatory Commission -
Region II
- _
101 Marietta Street,. Suite 3100 -_
Atlanta, Georgia* 30303
Dear Mr. 0 'Reilly:
Serial No. 875 NO/RMT:ms
- Docket Nos.* 50_~280 281
-License Nos. DPR-32 DPR-:37 We have reviewed._ your letter
- of October 17,.1980 in inspection _.conducted at *Surry Power Station on September reported in IE Inspection Report - Nos. 50-280/80-35 and responses to the specific infractions are attached.
re£erence to the 9 and lO, 1980 and 50-281/80-38.
Our We have reports.
tion to determined that no proprietary information Accordingly, the Virginia Electric and Power these inspection reports being made a matter is contained in the Company has no obj ec-of public disclosure.
-Attachment cc:
Mr~ Steven A. Varga., Chief Operating Reactors Branch No. 1 Division of Licensing Very truly yours~
~i:
Manager - Nuclear Operations and* Maintenance
V'
/'
NRC COMMENT Attachment
- Page 2 As required by Criterion XVII of Appendix B to 10 CFR 50 and implemented by VEPCO Topical Report VEP-1-A Section 17 paragraph 17.2.17, states in part that Quality Assurance records relating to **. documentary evidence of
.** activities affecting quality.** include monitoring of work performance, and maintained and are retrievable.
Contrary to the above on* September 10,. 1980, there was no documentary evidence to verify that VEPCO' s NDT group* had monitored vendor work performed relative to IE Bulletin 79-17 NDE inspections.
This is a deficiency.
VEPCO RESPONSE
- 1.
Corrective action taken and results achieved:
The* work, when performed, was in fact monitored by NDT personnel attached to the station and a memorandum to that. effect has been placed in station records.
Further review of the circumstances revealed that an approved station procedure exists for this monitor-ing effort but had been overlooked in this circumstance.
2 *.
Corrective steps taken to avoid further non-compliance:
The _approved procedure has been. reviewed with all members *of the station NDT staff and will be used in the future.
- 3.
Date when full compliance will be achieved:
Full. compliance has been achievedo
NRC COMMENT e
SURRY POWER STATION RESPONSE TO NOTICE OF VIOLATION APPENDED TO INSPECTION REPORTS 50-280/80-35 AND 50-281/80-38 e
Attachment Page 1 As required by *Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR* 50 and implemented by VEPCO Topical Report VEP-l-A. Section 17 paragraph 17. 2. 5, states in part that~ ** procedures shall i~clude appropriate quantitative acceptance criteria for determining that important activities have been satisfac-torily accompiished.
Contrary to the above on September 10, 1980, NDE-15.1 "Visual Examination of Nuclear Components did not contain specific acceptance *criteria for initj.al inspection of.welds. fabricated to applicable construction codes.
This is an infraction.
VEPCO RESPONSE
- 1.
Corrective action taken and results achieved:
VEPCO has approved, for use, a new procedure, NDT 15. 2 (Visual Inspection of Welds) which provides inspection procedures specific
. to weldments.
- 2.
Corrective steps to avoid further non-compliance:
Weld inspection will be conducted by the new procedure.
- 3.
Date when full compliance will be achieved:
Full compliance has been achieved.