Text

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report: January 1, 2017 - December 31, 2017
	ML18137A216
Person / Time
Site:	Ginna
Issue date:	05/31/2018
From:	; Exelon Generation Co
To:	; Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
	Download: ML18137A216 (224)
	v • d • e

Exelon Generation.

ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT:

JANUARY 1, 2017 - DECEMBER 31, 2017 MAY 2018 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant 1503 Lake Road Ontario, New York 14519

January 1 - December 31, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES .............. .... ....... ..... .. ......... .. .... ................................................................... ...... ii LIST OFT ABLES ..................... ......... ............... .......... ..... ... ..... ....... ... ..... ...... .... .. ...... ...... ..... ... .. .... iii

1. EXECUTIVE

SUMMARY

..... .. ............... ....... .... ... ... ........ ... .. .... ...... .. ......... .. ..... .. .. ......... .... .. . 1

2. INTRODUCTION ... .. ..... ........... .... ....................................... .. .... ... ... .... ...... ...... ........... .......... .2 2.1 Station Description .... ...... ..... ....... ..... .... ... .. ........ ... ... ............... ................. ... ... .. ........ ... ....... 2 2.2 Program Description and Background ..... ......... ... ........ ...... ...... ..... .. ... .. ..... ... ........ .... ... ...... 2 2.3 Program Objectives_. .. ....... ........ ...................... ..... ........... .. ....... ........ ....... ........................... 2

3. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION ..................... .. ...... ....... .. ................ .. ... .................... .. ................ 3 3.1 Sample Collection and Analysis .... ................................ ... .... .... ... ... .. ... ........... ..... ............. 3 3.2 Data Interpretation .... .. .... ........ ..... .... ...... .. ............ ..... .............. ................................. .......... 3 3.3 Quality Assurance Program ....... .. .. ................................ .. ..... .. ... ...... ... ...... ........................ 3 3.4 Land Use Survey ..... ....... ...... .. .... .... ..... .......... ............ ...... .......................... ......... ....... ........ 4 3.5 Program Exceptions ...................... .... ... ..... .. ... ....... .. ... .. .... ..... .. .. ... .... .. .... .. ... ... .... ... .. ... ...... .5 3.6 Corrections to Previous Reports .... ................... ... ... .... ... ... ... ... ... ...... ... ... ... .... .... .. ........... .... 5

4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS ... ............. ............ ............ ...................... ............. ............... 6 4.1 Aquatic Environment ........................... ..... ............. ... ... ... .... .... ... ....................... ... ....... .... .. 6 4.1.a Surface and Drinking Water .. .... ...................................... .................................... ....... 6 4.1. b Aquatic Organisms ........... ................................ .. ............................................... ........ .7 4.1.c Shoreline Sediment ..... ..... .... ........................................... ................................ ..... ...... 7 4.2 Atmospheric Environment ........................................... ... .... ..... ... ... ... .. ......... .... ....... ... .. .... .7 4.2.a Air Iodine ............. ......... ........................... ... .... ..... ... ... .... ... .... ....... ... .... .. ......... ...... ..... .8 4.2.b Air Particulate Filters .... .... ..... ... ....... ......... .. .... .. ........... .... .... ..... ... ... ... ... .... ... ........ ..... .8 4.3 Terrestrial Environment ............. ........... .... .. ....... ... ...... ....... ... ... ......... ... .. ... ...... ....... ........... 8 4.3.a Vegetation ............................... ........................... ..... .. ................. ...... .... ... .... ......... ...... 8 4.3.b Milk ... ..... .............. .. ... ..... .... ..... ...... ... .......... ............... .. ............................................... 9 4.4 Direct Radiation .. ............. ................................. .............. ... ... ....... ............................... ...... 9 4.5 Groundwater ... ................................. ....... .... ......... ...... ........ ...... ... .. ..... ........ ... .. ................. 11 4.6 Summary and Conclusion ..... ....... ........ ...... ... ............. .................................................. ... 11

5. REFERENCES ........................... ...... ... .. .. ... ..... ....... ........ .. ... ... .......................... .... .. .... .......... 12 Appendix A REMP Sample Locations ....................... ... ... .... ... ... .... .... ... ... ... .. ... ..... ................... 16 Appendix B REMP Analytical Results ............................................................. .... ... .. ..... .. .. ...... 25 Appendix C Quality Assurance Program ........ .... .. ....................... ... .......... ............. ... ............... 51 Appendix D Land Use Survey .. ............................. ... .. ..... ...... .... ..... ... ....... ............. ...... ... ..... ..... 63 Appendix E Interpretations and Graphical Representations .. . ... .. . .... . . . ....... ...... . ......... 67

January 1 - December 31, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 LIST OF FIGURES Figure Title Page 1 Hypothetical Maximum Direct Radiation Dose Exposure per Year .. ..... ............ .............. 10 A-1 Map of New York State and Lake Ontario Showing Location of R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant .................. .................... ...... ........ ....... .... ...... ..................... ... ... ... ... .......... ........ 21 A-2 Onsite Sample Locations .................. ..... ............... .... ... .... ... ................. ... ........ ... ... ............. 22 A-3 Offsite Sample Locations (TLDs and milk farms within 5 miles) .... ... ... ............ ... ..... ..... ..23 A-4 Water Sample, Milk Farms and TLD Locations .. ........ ....... ...... .. ...... ............ .. ... ...... ..... ..... 24 E-1 E-Series 1, Table B-1 (Gross Beta Values for Surface and Drinking Water ..... .......... .69 E-2 E-Series 2, Table B-5 / B-6 (Beta in Air Particulates) .......... ............. . ..... ........... .. 73 E-3 E-Series 3, Table B-12 (Direct Radiation) ....... .. ........ .. ..... ............... ........ .. .... .. 78 E-4 E-Series 4, Table B-13 (Tritium in Groundwater) ..... . .... .... ........ ... ............ ...... ....93 II

January 1 - December 31, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 LIST OF TABLES Table Title Page 1 Synopsis of R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program ......... .. ...... ........ ..... ... .......... ..................... ............. ... ...... .... .. ... .......... .. .. ... ............ .. 13 2 Annual Summary of Radioactivity in the Environs of the R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant

............ ...................... ........ ..... ....... ..... .... ... ....... ..... ........... .. .. .. ......... .. ...... ............................ 14 A-1 Locations of Environmental Sampling Stations for the R.E. Ginna Nuclear Plant.. ............ 18 B-1 Concentration of Tritium, Gamma Emitters and Gross Beta in Surface and Drinking Water

............ ...... ........ .... ..... ....... ..... ..... ... .. .. ... ........... .......................... ... ......... .. ... .... ... .... .... ... ......27 B-2 Concentration of Gamma Emitters in the Flesh of Edible Fish ..... ....... ...... ............... .. ... .. ... 30 B-3 Concentration of Gamma Emitters in Sediment.. ..... ....... ... .. ................ ... ... .... .. .......... ... ...... .31 B-4 Concentration of Iodine-131 in Filtered Air (Charcoal Cartridges) ................ ... ...... .. ... ... .... 32 B-5 Concentration of Beta Emitters in Air Particulates - Onsite Samples .. ......... ........ ... .... .. .. ...34 B-6 Concentration of Beta Emitters in Air Particulates - Offsite Samples .. .. .. ... .................. .... .. 37 B-7 Concentration of Gamma Emitters in Air Particulates ......................... ... .. ... ...... ... ... .. .. ........ 39 B-8 Concentration of Gamma Emitters in Vegetation Samples ..... .... .... .. ........ ......... ..... ..... ....... .41 B-9 Concentration of Gamma Emitters (including 1-131) in Milk .... ... .. ... ... ... .. ......... ....... ........ .42 B-10 Typical MDA Ranges for Gamma Spectrometry ...... ... ..... .................... .... .. ............. .. .. ....... .43 B-11 Typical LLDs for Gamma Spectrometry ....... ...... ............... .............................. .. ................ .44 B-12 Direct Radiation .................. .... .... ..... ............ ... ... ..... ... ............................ ....... ... .................... 45 B-13 Groundwater Monitoring Wells .......................................................................................... .48 C-1 Results of Participation in Cross Check Programs ... ......... ..... ... ............... .... ... ........ ............. 53 C-2 Results of Quality Assurance Program ...... .. .. ... ....... ... ................... ...... .. .............................. 55 C-3 Teledyne Brown Engineering's Typical MDAs for Gamma Spectrometry ...... .. ..... ............ 62 D-1 Land Use Survey Distances .... .. .................................................... .. .... .... .... ... ... ... ... ..... ......... 65 Ill

January 1 - December 31, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244

1. EXECUTIVE

SUMMARY

The Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) is a comprehensive surveillance program, which is implemented to assess the impact of site operations on the environment and compliance with 10 CFR 50 Appendix I and 40 CFR 190. Samples are collected from the aquatic and terrestrial pathways applicable to the site. The aquatic pathways include Lake Ontario fish, surface waters, groundwater, and lakeshore sediment. The terrestrial pathways include airborne particulate and radioiodine, milk, food products, and direct radiation.

Results of the monitoring program for the 2017 operational period for R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant are included in this report. This report presents a synopsis of the REMP (Table 1),

summary of the detectable activity analytical results (Table 2), sampling locations (Appendix A),

compilation of the analytical data (Appendix B) , results of the Quality Assurance Program (Appendix C), and results of the Land Use Survey (Appendix D). Interpretation of the data and conclusions are presented in the body of this report.

The results of the REMP verify that the effluent releases did not impact the environment with a measurable concentration of radioactive materials and/or levels of radiation that are higher than expected. The 2017 results for all pathways sampled were consistent with the previous five-year historical results and exhibited no adverse trends. The results of the REMP continue to demonstrate that the operation of the plant does not result in a significant measurable dose to a member of the general population, or adversely impact the environment as a result of radiological effluents. The program continues to demonstrate that the dose to a member of the public, as a result of the operation of R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant, remains significantly below the federally required dose limits specified in 10 CFR 20 and 40 CFR 190.

January 1 - December 31, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244

2. INTRODUCTION 2.1 Station Description The R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant (Ginna), owned by Exelon Generation, is an operating nuclear generating facility consisting of one pressurized water reactor. Ginna achieved criticality in September 1969 and commenced commercial operation in July 1970. The location of the plant in relation to local metropolitan areas is depicted in Appendix A, Figure A-1 .

2.2 Program Description and Background The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report is published in accordance with Section 5.0 of the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM, Ref. 1) and the Plant's Technical Specifications (Ref. 2). This report describes the REMP, and its implementation as required by the ODCM. The environmental surveillance data collected during this reporting period were compared with that generated in previous periods whenever possible to evaluate the environmental radiological impact of the R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant. Results of the monitoring program for the pre-operational and previous operational periods through 2016 have been reported in a series of previously released documents.

The REMP is implemented to measure radioactivity in the aquatic and terrestrial pathways. The aquatic pathways include Lake Ontario fish, surface waters, groundwater, and lakeshore sediment. Measurement results of the samples representing these pathways contained only natural background radiation or low concentrations of Cs-137 resulting from past atmospheric nuclear weapons testing. Terrestrial pathways monitored included airborne particulate and radioiodine, milk, food products, and direct radiation.

2.3 Program Objectives The objectives of the REMP for the R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant are:

a. Measure and evaluate the effects of plant operation on the environment.

b. Monitor background radiation levels in the environs of the Ginna site.

c. Demonstrate compliance with the environmental conditions and requirements of applicable state and federal regulations, including the ODCM and 40 CFR 190.

d. Provide information by which the general public can evaluate environmental aspects of the operation of R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant.

2

January 1 - December 31, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244

3. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION 3.1 Sample Collection and Analysis The locations of the individual sampling stations are listed in Table A-1 and shown in Figures A-2 and A-3. All samples were collected and analyzed by Exelon personnel or its contractors in accordance with Ginna procedures (Ref. 3).

During 2017, 1346 samples were collected for analysis by gross beta counting, tritium, and/or gamma spectroscopy. These included 89 surface water samples, 16 fish samples, 5 sediment samples, 623 air particulate amples, 311 air iodine samples, 28 vegetation samples, 38 milk samples, 72 groundwater samples, and 164 dosimeter measurements. Deviations from the REMP sampling schedule are described in section 3.5. This monitoring program satisfied the minimum number of samples required by the ODCM for all pathways.

R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant's Chemistry personnel collected all REMP samples. Analysis was performed at either Ginna's onsite laboratory (groundwater samples), Environmental Dosimetry Company in Sterling Massachusetts (direct radiation samples), or Exelon Industrial Services - Ft. Smallwood Environmental Laboratory in Baltimore, Maryland (surface and drinking water, aquatic organisms, shoreline sediment, air particulate filters, air iodine, and vegetation samples). A summary of the content of the REMP and the results of the data collected for indicator and control locations are provided in Tables 1 and 2.

3.2 Data Interpretation Many results in environmental monitoring occur at or below the minimum detectable activity (MDA). In this report, all results below the relevant MDA are reported as being "not detected." Typical MDA values are listed in Appendix B, Table B-10.

3.3 Quality Assurance Program Appendix C provides a summary of Exelon Industrial Services (EIS) - Ft. Smallwood Environmental Laboratory's quality assurance program for 2017. It consists of Table C-1, which represents a compilation of the results of the EIS - Ft. Smallwood Environmental Laboratory's participation in an inter-comparison program with Environmental Resource As ociates (ERA) located in Arvada, Colorado and Analytics, Inc. located in Atlanta, Georgia. Table C-2 compiles the results of the Exelon Industrial Services Ft. Smallwood Laboratory's participation in a split sample program with Teledyne Brown Engineering located in Knoxville, Tennessee. Table C-3 identifies a list of typical MDA's achieved by Teledyne Brown for Gamma Spectroscopy.

All the EIS - Ft. Smallwood Environmental Laboratory results contained in Table C-1 agree with the inter-comparison laboratory results within the range of +/-2 cr between the analytical values or are in agreement with the ranges established in the NRC Resolution Test Criteria.

3

January 1 - December 31, 201 7 Docket Nos. 50-244 All the results contained in Table C-2 agree within the range of +/-2 cr of each other with their respective Ft. Smallwood Environmental Laboratory original, replicate and/or Teledyne Brown Engineering's split laboratory samples.

3.4 Land Use Survey In September 2017, Ginna staff conducted a Land Use Survey to identify the location of the nearest milk animal, the nearest residence, and the nearest garden greater than 500 square feet in each of the nine sectors within a five-mile radius of the power plant. The Land Use Survey is conducted in accordance with Ginna procedures (Ref. 4 ). The position of the nearest residence and garden and animals producing milk for human consumption in each sector is provided in Appendix D, Table D-1.

Over the past year, the following land use observations were made within a 5-mile radius of the power plant:

The nearest residence remains in the SSE sector, approximately 610 meters from the reactor.

Single-family home/ housing subdivision construction was observed near the plant on Ridge Road (Union Hill, Ontario), northeast corner of Lake Road and Slocum Road, and Lakeside Road.

New apartment complex construction observed north of Ridge Road in Ontario.

Other single-family home construction was observed sporadically within 5-miles of the plant.

A new 120-acre commercial hydroponic farm began construction on the east-end of Timothy Lane (North of Route 104).

A new 22-acre solar farm is located north of Route 104 (Dean Parkway, Ontario) .

Commercial fishing information was collected from the New Yark State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) which shows activity only in the Eastern basin of Lake Ontario. Commercial fishing operations have not changed in the last five-years .

No new agricultural land use was identified.

No new food producing facilities were identified as the commercial hydroponic farm is not currently growing produce.

No new milk producing animals were identified. Eaton Farm (supplemental sample) changed names / owner to Field Craft Farms. Its location remains unchanged.

4

January 1 - December 31, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 3.5 Program Exceptions The reportable items in the Annual Environmental Radiological Operating Report under procedure CHA-RETS-V ARIATION are as follows:

On 11/14/16, the composite sampler located at Monroe County Water Authority (MCWA) was turned off by the municipality owners until the end of December 2016 due to maintenance on the plant chemical treatment system. Compensatory weekly grab samples were taken at Slater Creek from 11/14/16-1/9/17.

On 5/31/17, Environmental Air Sampler 4 (ES4) was discovered to have had a GFI trip during the week of 5/22/17 - 5/30/17. For this sample period, ES4 ran for 29.0 hours0 days 0 hours 0 weeks 0 months and collected 63 .0 m3 of sample volume, which does not meet the minimum required sample volume for the sampling period. The GFI was successfully reset on 5/31/17.

On 7/17/17, the water source at Monroe County Water Authority (MCWA) low-lift station was not available to the compositor due to maintenance on the plant chemical treatment system. Compensatory grab samples were taken at Slater Creek and Lake Ontario starting the week of7/10/17 and lasting until 10/4/17.

On 10/20/17, the circulating water (out) compositor was taken out of service for maintenance. A compensatory grab sample was taken on 10/20/17 and the sample pump was placed back in service on 10/20/17.

During the 2017 reporting year, the flow meter associated with Environmental Station ES3 exhibited lower than acceptable acceptance criterion. Acceptance criteria for the flow meter is+/- 2.5%. However, the flow meter was discovered to have a 5.8%

measurement during the post-performance calibration check when it was removed from the field. The consequence is that less air flowed through the filters than was used in calculations of activity in pCi/m3 on the filters.

3.6 Corrections to Previous Reports There are no corrections necessary to any previously submitted Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report (AREOR).

5

January 1 - December 31, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244

4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS All environmental samples collected during the year were analyzed in accordance with Exelon analytical procedures (Ref. 5). The analytical results for this reporting period are presented in Appendix B and the detectable activity results are also summarized in Table 2. For discussion purposes, the analytical results are divided into five categories: Aquatic Environment, the Atmospheric Environment, the Terrestrial Environment, Direct Radiation, and Groundwater.

4.1 Aquatic Environment The aquatic environment surrounding the plant was monitored by analyzing samples of surface and drinking water, Lake Ontario fish, and shoreline sediment. These samples were obtained from various sampling locations near the plant.

4.1.a Surface and Drinking Water Monthly composite samples are collected from Lake Ontario at an upstream control location (Monroe County Water Authority - Shoremont) and a downstream indicator location (Ontario Water District Plant - OWD) and analyzed for gross beta activity (Table B-1). A grab sample of Deer Creek is collected and analyzed monthly for gross beta activity (Table B-1).

In 2017, the gross beta averages for the upstream Lake Ontario monitoring locations (controls) and downstream Lake Ontario monitoring locations (indicators) were 1.83 pCi/Liter and 1.94 pCi/Liter, respectively. Gross beta analysis of the monthly composite samples showed no statistically significant difference in activity between the control and indicator locations that would indicate plant related activity higher than background.

The average gross beta concentration seen in the Mill Creek samples (control) and the Deer Creek (indicator) samples were 2.76 pCi/Liter and 3.28 pCi/Liter, respectively. Gross beta analysis of the samples showed no statistically significant difference in activity between the control and indicator locations that would indicate plant related activity higher than background.

Gamma isotopic analysis is performed on each monthly composite sample. These are listed in Table B-1 and are separated by source of sample. During 2017, no sample results indicated detection of Gamma activity.

Tritium analysis was performed on all water samples on a monthly basis. Composites are made from the weekly samples and a portion filtered to remove interferences for analysis by beta scintillation. During 2017, no surface water or drinking water sample results indicated detectable tritium activity.

6

January 1 - December 31, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 4.1.b Aquatic Organisms Indicator fish are caught in the vicinity of the Discharge Canal and analyzed for radioactivity from liquid effluent releases from the plant. The fish are filleted to represent that portion which would normally be eaten. Additional fish are caught more than 15 miles away to be used as control samples and are prepared in the same manner.

At a minimum, four different edible species of fish are analyzed during each half-year from the indicator and background locations. Fish are caught by R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant Chemistry personnel and are analyzed by gamma spectroscopy after being held for periods typically less than two weeks to keep the LLD value for the shorter half-life isotopes realistic.

Detection limits could also be affected by small mass samples, (< 2000 grams), in some species.

Gamma isotopic concentrations (pCi/kilogram wet) are listed in Table B-2.

During 2017, none of the indicator samples indicated activity other than naturally occurring radionuclides. There was no significant difference in the radiological activity in the indicator and control sampling locations.

4.1.c Shoreline Sediment Samples of shoreline sediment are taken upstream (Town of Greece near Slater Creek) and downstream (Near the Ontario Water District) of R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant.

Results of the gamma isotopic analysis for sediment are included in Table B-3. During 2017, all sediment samples indicated that gamma emitters were below detection limits. There was no difference in the radiological activity observed in the indicator and control sampling locations.

4.2 Atmospheric Environment Radioactive particles in air are collected by drawing approximately one standard cubic foot per minute (SCFM) through a two-inch diameter particulate filter. The volume of air sampled is measured by a dry gas meter and corrected for the pressure drop across the filter. The filters are changed weekly and allowed to decay for three days prior to counting to eliminate most of the natural radioactivity such as the short half-life decay products of radon . The decay period is used to give a more sensitive measurement of long-lived man-made radioactivity.

A ring of six sampling stations is located on the plant site from 180 to 440 meters from the reactor centerline near the point of the maximum annual average ground level concentration, one additional sampling location is located on-site at 770 meters, and two others offsite at approximately seven miles. In addition, there are three sampling stations located approximately seven to 16 miles from the site that serve as control stations. See Figure A-2 and Figure A-4.

7

January 1 - December 31, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 4.2.a Air Iodine Radioiodine cartridges are placed at six locations. These cartridges are changed and analyzed each week. No positive analytical results were found on any sample. A list of values for these cartridges is given in Table B-4.

4.2.b Air Particulate Filters The major airborne species released from the plant are noble gases and tritium. Most of this activity is released in a gaseous form; however, some radioiodine is released as airborne particulate and some of the particulate activity is due to short lived noble gas decay products.

Tables B-5 provides a list of gross beta analysis values for the on-site sample stations. Table B-6 is a list of gross beta analysis values for the off-site sample stations.

Based on the weekly comparisons, there was no statistical difference between the control and indicator radioactive particulate concentrations. The average for the control samples (i.e., offsite sampling locations) was 0.021 pCi/m3 and the averages for the indicator samples (i.e., onsite sampling locations) was 0.021 pCi/m3 for the period of January to December 2017. Maximum weekly concentrations for all control stations and all indicator stations were 0.045 pCi/m 3 and 0.045 pCi/m3, respectively.

The particulate filters from each sampling location were saved and a 13-week composite was made. A gamma isotopic analysis was performed for each sampling location and corrected for decay. No positive analytical results were found on any sample. The results of these analyses are listed in Tables B-7.

4.3 Terrestrial Environment Crops are grown on the plant property in a location with a highest off-site meteorological deposition parameter, and samples of the produce are collected at harvest time for analysis.

Control samples are purchased from farms greater than 10 miles from the plant.

4.3.a Vegetation There was no indication in the vegetation samples contained activity greater than naturally occurring background levels. There was no difference in the radiological activity observed in the indicator and control sampling locations. Gamma isotopic data is provided in Table B-8.

8

January 1 - December 31, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 4.3.b Milk There was one indicator dairy herd located within five miles from the plant in 2016. Milk samples are collected monthly during November through May from the indicator farm and biweekly during June through October. A control farm sample is taken for each monthly sample and once during each biweekly period. The milk i analyzed for Iodine-131 and also analyzed by gamma spectroscopy.

During 2017, no samples indicated 1-131 activity above detection levels. There was no difference in the radiological activity observed in the indicator and control sampling locations.

Table B-9 provides a listing of all samples collected and analytical results.

4.4 Direct Radiation Dosimeters are placed as part of the environmental monitoring program. 41 dosimeter badges are currently placed in four rings around the plant. These rings range from less than 1,000 feet to 15 miles and have been dispersed to give indications in each of the nine land based sectors around the plant should an excessive release occur from the plant. Badges are changed and read after approximately three months exposure. Each direct radiation sampling location is described in Table A-1 and identified in Figure A-2.

Direct radiation readings at locations #7 and #13 are influenced by their close proximity to the site's Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) and will normally read slightly higher than other locations. Environmental Station 13, the closest sampling location to the ISFSI, received an average quarterly dose of 19.6 rnRem during 2017. All onsite indicators averaged 12.7 rnRem/qtr.

For the year of 2017, the average, minimum, and maximum exposure readings was as follows:

Monitoring Groug Average Min. Max (mrem/gtr} (mrem/qtr} (mrem/qtr}

Onsite Indicators 12.7 8.8 22.1 Site Boundary Indicators 12.4 9.2 14.8 Offsite Indicators 11.4 8.1 14.1 Control Locations 10.7 9.0 12.8 40 CFR 190 requires that the annual dose equivalent not exceed 25 millirem to the whole body of any member of the public. The average quarterly exposure observed at the control monitoring stations was used to determine the background level (equivalent to 10.7 millirems monthly or 42.8 millirem annually), while the highest total annual dosimeter reading at an individual site boundary environmental monitoring location (55.9 millirem) was observed at Environmental Monitoring Station #64. The difference in these values determines the maximum possible direct radiation dose exposure to an offsite member of the public. Accordingly, the hypothetical maximum direct radiation dose exposure to the public for 2017 was determined to be 13.1 millirem by subtraction of average background from the maximum annual indicator site.

9

January 1 - December 31, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 Figure 1 represents the hypothetical maximum direct radiation dose exposure over the past fourteen years. As noted in the 2011 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report (AREOR), an apparent upward trend with the reported average annual direct radiation dose was identified. It was noted that the average annual direct dose to an offsite member of the public had increased 2- 3 mRem since 2008 (Condition Report CR-2012-001275). Ginna staff evaluated this apparent trend and concluded the elevated dosimeter readings were likely the result of increased onsite hold times after the dosimeters had been collected. To reduce onsite hold times, Ginna changed its process for collecting and shipping dosimeters in 2014.

Figure 1 HYPOTHETICAL MAXIMUM DIRECT RADIATION DOSE EXPOSURE PER YEAR 30 25

....ro (lJ 20

<E (lJ E

15 (lJ V,

0 0

10 5

0 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

- Max (mrem/yr) 8 8 7.6 6 7.2 11.7 10.4 12.4 11 12.1 11.7 10.2 12.8 13.1

- 40CFR190 Limit 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Year 10

January 1 - December 31, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 4.5 Groundwater In accordance with R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant' s Chemistry procedures, at a minimum, environmental groundwater monitoring wells are sampled quarterly. In 2017, Ginna staff collected and analyzed samples collected from a total of 14 groundwater monitoring wells:

GWOl: Warehouse Access Road (Control)

- GW03: Screenhouse West, South Well GW04: Screenhouse West, North Well

- GW05: Screenhouse East, South (15.5')

GW06: Screenhouse East, Middle (20.0')

- GW07: Screenhouse East, North (24.0')

GW08: All Volatiles Treatment Building

- GWll GWlO: Technical Support Center, South

Contaminated Storage Building, SE (24.0 ' )

- GW13: West GW12: of Orchard Access Road North of Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI)

- GW15: West GW14: South of Canister Preparation Building of Manor House

GW16: Southeast of Manor House Groundwater samples are analyzed for tritium to a detection limit of 500 pCi/L, and for gamma emitting radionuclides to the environmental LLDs . The analytical results for groundwater monitoring well samples collected during 2017 are presented in table B-13 .

No positive tritium results were identified in any of the groundwater monitoring wells during 2017.

4.6 Summary and Conclusion Operation of the R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant produced radioactivity and ambient radiation levels significantly below the limits of the ODCM and 40 CFR 190. The analytical results from the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program indicate the operation of the R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant had no measurable radiological impact on the environment or significant build-up of plant-related radionuclides in the environment. The results also indicate operation of the plant did not result in a measurable radiation dose to the general population above natural background levels.

Additionally, the 2017 results are consistent with data for the past five years and exhibited no detectable increases or adverse trends. Further explanation on REMP data can be found in Appendix E.

11

January 1 - December 31, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244

5. REFERENCES

1. R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant, Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM),

Revision 30 - 33 (Effective Date: 09/11/2015 - end of year)

2. R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant, Technical Specification 5.6.2; Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report.

3. Procedure CY-AA-170-100, Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program.

4. Procedure CH-ENV-LAND-USE, Land Use Census; Completed September 2017.

5. Exelon Industrial Services - Ft. Smallwood Environmental Laboratory Procedures Manual, General Services Department.

12

January 1 - December 31, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 Table 1 Synopsis of R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Sample Type Sampling Number of Number Collected Analysis Analysis Number Analyzed Frequency' Locations Frequency' Aquatic Environment Surface & Drinking MIC 7 89 Gamma MC/MG 89 Water 89 Gross Beta MC/MG 89 89 Tritium M/Q 89 Fish 2 A 5 16 Gamma A 16 Shoreli ne Sediment SA 3 5 Gamma SA 5 Groundwater M/Q 14 72 Tritium M/Q 72 72 Gamma M/Q 72 Atmospheric Environment Air Iodine 3 w 6 3 11 I-131 w 311 Air Particulates 4 w 12 623 Gross Beta w 623 48 Gamma QC 48 Direct Radiation Ambient Radiation Q 41 164 TLD Q 164 Terrestrial Environment Milk5 M/BW 2 38 Gamma M/BW 38 Vegetation6 M 5 28 Gamma M 28 1 W=Weekly, BW=BiWeekly ( 15 days), M=Monthly (31 days), Q=Quarterly (92 days) , SA=Semiannual , A=Annual , C=Composite 2

Twice during fishing season including at least four species.

3 The collection device contains activated charcoal.

4 Beta counting is performed>= 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months following filter change. Gamma spectroscopy performed on quarterly composite of weekly samples.

5 Bi-Weekly during growing season.

6 Annual at time of harvest. Samples include broad leaf vegetation.

13

January 1 - December 31 , 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 Table 2 Annual Summary of Radioactivity in the Environs of the R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant Medium or Path way Type and Total Lower Limit of Indicator Locations Locati on with Highest Annual Control Locations Sampled (Unit of Number of Analyses Detection (LLD) Mean (F)/Range 1 Highest Annual Mean (F) I Range 1 Mean (F)/Range Measurement) Perfo rmed Mean Name/Distance &

Direction2 Aquatic Environment Surface & Drinking Gamma (89) 2.3 (Cs- 137) -- (0/47) ( 12/1 2) -- (23/23)

Water Tritium (89) 2000 -- (0/47) (--)

(pCi/L)

Surface & Drinking Gross Beta (89) 0.5 2.25 (51/51 ) Deer Creek - 3.28 ( 12/12) 2.28 (25/25)

Water, ( 1.30 - 4.95) ESE ( 1.72 - 4.95) (0.72 - 4.47)

(pCi/L)

Sediment Gamma (5) 17 (Cs- 137) -- (3/3) -- (3/3) -- (2/2)

(pCi/kg)

Fish Gamma ( 16) 15 (Cs- 137) -- (8/8) -- (8/8) -- (8/8)

(pCi/kg) (--) (--)

Groundwater Tritium (72) 500 -- (72/72) -- (12/1 2) -- (4/4)

(pCi/L) Gamma (72) 2.3 (Cs- 137) -- (72/72) -- (12/1 2) -- (4/4)

Direct Radiation Ambient Radiation Dosimeters (164) 12. l ( 128/ I 28) Env. Stati on I 3 19.6 (4/4) 10.7 (3 6/36)

(mR/91 days) (8.I-22.1) 0.77km SSW ( 18.0-22. I ) (9.0-12.8) 14

January 1 - December 31 , 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 Table 2 Annual Summary of Radioactivity in the Environs of the R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant Medium or Pathway T ype and Total Lower Limit of Indicator Locations Locati on with Highest A nnual Control Locations Sampled (Unit of Number of Analyses Detection (LLD) Mean (F)/Range 1 Highest Annual Mean (F) / Range 1 Mean (F)/Range Measurement) Perfo rmed Mean Name/Di stance &

Directi on2 Atmospheric Environment Air Iodine 1-1 3 1 (311 ) 0.002 -- (259/259) -- (52/52) -- (52/52)

( 10-2 pCi/m 3) (--) (--) (--)

Air Particulates Gross Beta (623) 0.5 2. 1 (467/467) Env. Station 3 - 2.2 (52/52) 2. 1 (156/156)

(10*2 pCi/m 3) (0.7 - 4.5) 0.44 km ESE (0.8 - 4.3) (0.8 - 4 .5)

Air Particulates Gamma (48) 1.8 (Cs-1 37) -- (36/36) -- (4/4) -- (12/12)

( 10-3 pCi/m 3) (--) (--) (--)

Terrestrial Environment Milk Gamma (38) 0.0 1 (I- 13 1) -- ( 19/1 9) -- ( 19/1 9) -- (19/19)

(pCi/L) (--) (--) (--)

Vegetation Gamma (28) 27 (Cs-1 37) -- (20/20) -- (8/8) --(8/8)

(pCi/L) 1 Mean and range based upon detectab le measurements only. Fraction (F) of detectable measure ments at specified location is indicated in parentheses 2

From the center point of the containment building.

-- No detectable acti vity at specifi ed locati on.

15

January 1 - December 31 , 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 APPENDIX A REMP Sample Locations Summary of Appendix A Content Appendix A contains information concerning the environmental samples which were collected during this operating period.

Sample locations and specific information about individual locations for Ginna are provided in Table A-1.

Figure A-1 shows the location of the R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant in relation to New York State and Lake Ontario. Figures A-2, A-3 , and A-4 show the locations of the power plant sampling sites in relation to the plant site at different degrees of detail.

16

January 1 - December 31, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 TABLE OF CONTENTS - SAMPLING LOCATIONS Table Title Page A-1 Locations of Environmental Sampling Stations for the RE Ginna Nuclear Power Plant ... 18 Figure Title Page A-1 Map of New York State and Lake Ontario Showing Location of R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant ...... ... ..... ............ ....... ................................................................. .. ........... ... ... ........ ..... .21 A-2 Onsite Sample Locations ..... .. .......... .... ... ....... ...................................... .. .. .... .. ..... ...... ............ 22 A-3 Offsite Sample Locations (TLDs and milk farms within 5 miles) ............. ....... ... ... .. ........... 23 A-4 Water Sample, Milk Farms and TLD Locations .... ............. ..... ...... ... .... ...... .. ... ... ... ....... .... ... 24 17

January 1 - December 31, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 TABLEA-1 Locations of Environmental Sampling Stations for the R.E. Ginna Nuclear Plant Station Description Distance Direction Meters Miles Sector Air Samplers 2 Manor House Yard 360 0.22 E 3 East Field 440 0. 27 ESE 4 East of Training Center Parking Lot 320 0.20 SE 5 Creek Bridge 180 0. 11 SSE 6 Onsite-SW side of plant parking lot 300 0.19 SW 7 Onsite-utility pole along West plant fence 240 0.15 WSW 8 Seabreeze 19840 12.33 WSW 9 Webster 11150 6.93 SW 10 Walworth 12730 7.91 s 11 Williamson 11540 7. 17 ESE 12 Sodus Point 25170 15.64 E 13 Substation 13 770 0.48 SSW Direct Radiation 2 Onsite-Manor House Yard 360 0.22 E 3 Onsite-In field approximately 200 ft SE of stati on #2 440 0.27 ESE 4 Onsite- East of Training Center Parking Lot 320 0.19 SE 5 Onsite-Between creek and plant entry road 180 0.1 I SSE 6 Onsite-SW side of plant parking lot 300 0.19 SW 7 Onsite-utility pole along West plant fence 240 0.15 WSW 8 Topper Drive-Irondequoit, Seabreeze Substation #51 19840 12.33 WSW Phillips Road-Webster, intersection with Hi ghway #104, 9 11150 6.93 SW Substati on #74 10 Atlantic Avenue-Walworth , Substati on #230 12730 7.91 s 11 W. Main Street-Wi lliamson, Substation #207 11540 7.17 ESE 12 Seaman Avenue-Sodus Point-Off Lake Road by 12 25170 15.64 E Sewer di strict, Substation #209 Onsite - South of Meteorologi cal Tower 13 260 0.16 WNW 14 NW corner of field along lake shore 860 0.5 3 WNW Field access road, west of orchard, approximately 3000' 15 920 0.57 w West of plant SW Corner of orchard, approximately 3000' West of 16 1030 0.64 WSW plant, approximately 200' North of Lake Road Utility pole in orchard, approximately 75 " North of Lake 17 510 0.32 SSW Road 18 Substation 13A fence, North Side 730 0.45 SSW 19 On NW corner of house l 00' East of plant access road 460 0.29 s Approximately 150' West of Ontario Center Road and 20 650 0.40 SSE approximately 170' South of Lake Road 18

January 1 - December 31, 201 7 Docket Nos. 50-244 TABLEA-1 Locations of Environmental Sampling Stations for the R.E. Ginna Nuclear Plant Station Description Distance Direction Meters Miles Sector North side of Lake Road , approximately 200' East of 21 660 0.41 SE Ontario Center Road 22 North side of Lake Road , SE, property corner 920 0.57 SE East property li ne, midway between Lake Road and 23 780 0.49 ESE Lake shore 24 Lake shore near NE corner of property 730 0.45 E 25 Substation #73 , Klem Road , adjacent to 897 Klem Road 14000 8.70 WSW 26 Service Center, Pl ank Road, West of 250 14600 9.07 SW Atlantic Avenue at Knollwood Drive utility po le, North 27 14120 8.77 SSW side of road Substation #193 , Marion , behind Stanton Ag. Service, 28 17450 10.84 SE North Main Street Substation #208 , Town Line Road (CR-118), I 000 '

29 14050 8.73 ESE

North of Route I 04 30 District Office, Sodus, on pole, West side of bldg 20760 12.90 ESE Lake Road, pole 20' North of road, 500' East of Salt 31 Road 7330 4.56 w Woodard Road at County Line Road , pole@ Northwest 32 6070 3.77 WSW corner.

County Line Road at RR tracks, pole approximately 100' 33 7950 4.94 SW East along tracks 34 Pole at Route I 04, Lincoln Road, SW Corner. 6520 4.05 SSW Transmission Right of Way, North of Clevenger Road 35 7490 4.65 SSW on pole.

Substation #205 , Route I 04, East of Ontario Center 36 Road , North side of fence.

5480 3.41 s 37 Rail Road Aven ue, pole at 2048 5770 3.59 SSE 38 Fisher Road at RR Tracks, pole East of road 6910 4.29 SE Seeley Road , Pole South side JOO' West of intersection 39 6930 4.31 ESE with Stony Lo nesome Road 40 Lake Road at Stoney Lonesome Road , pole at SE corner 6440 4.00 E 63 Westside of warehouse access road 740 0.46 SW 64 Westside of direct road , adjacent to orchard 1190 0.74 w Fish Lake Ontario Discharge Plume 2200 1.37 ENE Russell Station 25600 15 .9 w 19

January 1 - December 31, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244

(," Produce (Vegetation)

Indicator and background samples of various produce are collected from gardens grown on company property and purchased from farms > 10 miles from the plant.

Station Description Distance Direction Meters Miles Sector Onsite Supplemental Garden (E) 610 0.38 E Onsite Supplemental Garden (ESE) 430 0.27 ESE Onsite Supplemental Garden (SSE) 660 0.41 SSE Water Shoremont/MCW A 27150 16.87 w Ontario Water District 2220 1.38 ENE Circ Water Intake 1070 0.66 N Circ Water Discharge 110 0.07 NNE Deer Creek Points Points ESE downstream downstream of Outfall of Outfall 006 006 Sediment Lake Ontario Discharge Plume 2200 1.37 ENE Russell Station 25600 15 .91 w Bethnic 1070 0.66 N Milk Eaton Farm, Williamson (Indi cator) 8240 5.12 ESE Schultz Farm, S. Sodus (Control) 19030 11.82 SE 20

January 1 - December 31 , 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 Figure A-1 Map of New York State and Lake Ontario Showing Location of R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant 21

January 1 - December 31, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 Figure A-2 Onsite Sample Locations

TLD D AIR SAMPLER

~ TLD AND AIR SAMPLER 22

January 1 - December 31 , 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 Figure A-3 Offsite Sample Locations (TLDs and Milk Farms within 5 Miles) 23

January 1 - December 31 , 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 Figure A-4 Water Sample, Milk Farms and TLD Locations

Dosimeter f'-1 AJr Sampler &

~ Dosimeter 24

January 1 - December 31, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 APPENDIXB REMP Analytical Results Summary of Appendix B Content Appendix Bis a presentation of the analytical results for the R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant radiological environmental monitoring programs.

25

January 1 - December 31, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 TABLE OF CONTENTS - ANALYTICAL RESULTS Table Title Page B-1 Concentration of Tritium, Gamma Emitters and Gross Beta in Surface and Drinking Water

..... ... .. ... .. .... .. .... ....... ...... .............. .... ................................................... ... ..... ..... ........... ..... ... .27 B-2 Concentration of Gamma Emitters in the Flesh of Edible Fish ... ..... ... ... ............ ........ ..... ... .30 B-3 Concentration of Gamma Emitters in Sediment.. ............. ... ....... ... ................. ...... .... .... ..... ... 31 B-4 Concentration of Iodine-131 in Filtered Air (Charcoal Cartridges) .......... ... ... ... .................. 32 B-5 Concentration of Beta Emitters in Air Particulates - Onsite Samples .... ...... ... .......... ....... ... 34 B-6 Concentration of Beta Emitters in Air Particulates - Offsite Samples .. .... ........ ... ................ 37 B-7 Concentration of Gamma Emitters in Air Particulates .......... ...................... ..... .... ... ............. 39 B-8 Concentration of Gamma Emitters in Vegetation Samples ... .. .... ... .... .... .. .. ......................... .41 B-9 Concentration of Gamma Emitters (including I-131) in Milk ................ ... ... .. ............. .. ..... .42 B-10 Typical MDA Ranges for GammaSpectrometry ..... .... ... ..... ........... ....... ............. ............ ..... .43 B-11 Typical LLDs for Gamma Spectrometry .. .................................... ... ....... ..... ... ....... ...... .. .... .. 44 B-12 Direct Radiation ........ ...... .... ..... .. . .... ... ........ ..................................................... .. ... ..... ........... 45 B-13 Groundwater Monitoring Wells ..................................... .. ... ........ .... ...... ... ......... ...... ............ .48 26

January 1 - December 31, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 Table B-1 Concentration of Tritium, Gamma Emitters and Gross Beta in Surface and Drinking Water (Results in units of pCi/L +/- 2cr)

Sample Code Sample Date Cs- 137 Tritium Gamma Emi tters 3 Gross Beta Ci/I CIRC-IN Circulating Water Inlet - N 1/9/2017 < 2.3 < 813

2.20 +/- 0.73 2/6/2017 < 2.3 < 719

1.84 +/- 0.7 1 3/6/2017 < 2.3 < 717

2.16 +/- 0.73 4/3/2017 < 2.3 < 626

1.75 +/- 0.63 5/1/2017 < 2.3 < 627

1.93 +/- 0.64 5/30/2017 < 2.3 < 623

2.3 1 +/- 0.66 6/26/2017 < 2.3 < 887

2.3 1 +/- 0.66 7/24/20)7* < 2.3 < 881

1.32 +/- 0.63 8/2 1/2017 < 2.3 < 885

1.63 +/- 0.64 9/1 8/2017 < 2.3 < 922

1.95 +/- 0.64 I0/1 6/2017 < 2.3 < 930

1.62 +/- 0.64 11/1 4/2017 < 2.3 < 930

2.62 +/- 0.65 12/ 11/2017 < 2.3 < 813

2.99 +/- 0.71 CIRC-OUT Circulating Water Outlet - N 1/9/2017 < 2.3 < 811

1.66 +/- 0.69 2/6/2017 < 2.3 < 721

1.71 +/- 0.70 3/6/2017 < 2.3 < 717

1.38 +/- 0.68 4/3/2017 < 2.3 < 623

1.87 +/- 0.64 5/1 /2017 < 2.3 < 618

1.30 +/- 0.60 5/30/2017 < 2.3 < 624

2.32 +/- 0.66 6/26/2017 < 2.3 < 884

2.37 +/- 0.67 7/24/2017 < 2.3 < 885

1.41 +/- 0.63 8/2 1/2017 < 2.3 < 891

1.57 +/- 0.64 9/1 8/2017 < 2.3 < 918

2.42 +/- 0.67 10/1 6/2017 < 2.3 < 935

2.02 +/- 0.67 11/1 4/2017 < 2.3 < 944

2.9 1 +/- 0.67 12/11 /2017 < 2.3 < 811

2.60 +/- 0.69 DC Deer Creek - ESE 1/4/2017 < 2.3 < 821

3.06 +/- 0.8 1 2/ 14/2017 < 2.3 < 725

1.72 +/- 0.74 3/9/2017 < 2.3 < 630

1.84 +/- 0.74 4/1 8/2017 < 2.3 < 886

2.9 1 +/- 0.73 5/1 6/2017 < 2.3 < 632

3.47 +/- 0.76 6/1 3/2017 < 2.3 < 633

3.49 +/- 0.76 7/11/2017 < 2.3 < 869

2.87 +/- 0.77 8/9/2017 < 2.3 < 1260

3.05 +/- 0.78 9/7/2017 < 2.3 < 922

3.43 +/- 0.78 10/3/2017 < 2.3 < 953

4.93 +/- 0.95 11 /6/2017 < 2.3 < 948

4.95 +/- 0.80 12/5/2017 < 2.3 < 821

3.64 +/- 0.79 27

January 1 - December 31, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 Table B-1 Concentration of Tritium, Gamma Emitters and Gross Beta in Surface and Drinking Water (Results in units of pCi/L +/- 2cr)

Sample Code Sample Date Cs-137 Tritium Gamma Emitters 3 Gross Beta Ci/I MCWA Monroe County Water/Shoremont, Greece-W 1 1/9/2017 < 2.3 < 814

0.72 +/- 0.67 2/6/2017 < 2.3 < 725

1.12 +/- 0.66 3/6/2017 < 2.3 < 714

1.53 +/- 0.69 4/3/2017 < 2.3 < 624

2. 18 +/- 0.66 5/1/2017 < 2.3 < 626

1.79 +/- 0.63 5/30/2017 < 2.3 < 625

1.62 +/- 0.61 6/26/2017 < 2.3 < 892

1.65 +/- 0.62 7/24/2017 < 2.3 < 891

1.97 +/- 0.68 8/21/2017 < 2.3 < 893

2.07 +/- 0.68 9/18/2017 < 2.3 < 930

2.36 +/- 0.67 10/16/2017 < 2.3 < 932

2.42 +/- 0.71 11/1 4/2017 < 2.3 < 933

2.58 +/- 0.65 12/11/2017 < 2.3 < 814

1.82 +/- 0.63 ML Mill Creek - SW 1 1/4/2017 < 2.3 < 822

3.8 1 +/- 0.84 2/14/2017 < 2.3 < 725

1.92 +/- 0.76 3/9/2017 < 2.3 < 624

1.93 +/- 0.75 4/18/2017 < 2.3 < 874

2.47 +/- 0.70 5/16/2017 < 2.3 < 633

2.21 +/- 0.67 6/1 3/2017 < 2.3 < 632

2.21 +/- 0.68 7/11/2017 < 2.3 < 896

2.63 +/- 0.75 8/9/2017 < 2.3 < 1250

1.94 +/- 0.70 9/7/2017 < 2.3 < 931

2.89 +/- 0.73 I 0/3/2017 < 2.3 < 961

3.48 +/- 0.81 I 1/6/2017 < 2.3 < 940

4.47 +/- 0.77 12/5/2017 < 2.3 < 822

3. I 5 +/- 0.75 w

Webster (Supplemental) 1/9/2017 < 2.3 < 812

1.60 +/- 0.69 2/6/2017 < 2.3 <722

1.33 +/- 0.67 3/6/2017 < 2.3 < 716

1.46 +/- 0.68 4/3/2017 < 2.3 < 628

1.62 +/- 0.62 5/1/2017 < 2.3 < 622

I .83 +/- 0.64 5/30/2017 < 2.3 < 624

2.1 8 +/- 0.65 6/26/2017 < 2.3 < 883

2.23 +/- 0.66 7/24/2017 < 2.3 < 884

1.39 +/- 0.63 8/21/2017 < 2.3 < 885

1.25 +/- 0.62 9/1 8/2017 < 2.3 < 924

1.56 +/- 0.6 1 10/16/2017 < 2.3 < 924

1.23 +/- 0.62 11/14/2017 < 2.3 < 944

2.72 +/- 0.66 28

January 1 - December 31, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 Table B-1 Concentration of Tritium, Gamma Emitters and Gross Beta in Surface and Drinking Water (Results in units of pCi/L +/- 2cr)

Sample Code Sample Date Cs-137 Tritium Gamma Emitters 3 Gross Beta Ci/1 OWD Ontario Water District - NE l/9/2017 < 2.3 < 813

1.55 +/- 0.69 2/6/2017 < 2.3 < 723

1.42 +/- 0.68 3/6/2017 < 2.3 <714

I .67 +/- 0.70 4/3/2017 < 2.3 < 628

1.44 +/- 0.61 5/1/2017 < 2.3 < 624

1.77 +/- 0.63 5/30/2017 < 2.3 < 625

1.81 +/- 0.62 6/26/2017 < 2.3 < 885

1.83 +/- 0.63 7/24/2017 < 2.3 < 886

1.91 +/- 0.67 8/21 /2017 < 2.3 < 887

I .52 +/- 0.64 9/18/2017 < 2.3 < 925

I .37 +/- 0.60 10/16/2017 < 2.3 < 931

I .89 +/- 0.66 11/14/2017 < 2.3 < 931

2.50 +/- 0.64 12/1 l/2017 < 2.3 < 813

2.68 +/- 0.69 1

Control Location 2

Sample collected from alternate location due to extreme drought conditions.

3 All Non-Natural Gamma Emitters< MDA.

29

January 1 - December 31 , 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 Table B-2 Concentration of Gamma Emitters in the Flesh of Edible Fish (Results in units of pCi/kg (wet)+/- 2cr)

Sample Code Sample Date Sample Type Gamma Emitters (Cs-137 CONTROL1 Local Sites in Control Sectors 6/1 8/2017 Brown Trout < 15 6/ 18/2017 Lake Trout < 15 6/18/2017 Smallmouth Bass < 15 9/25/2017 Smallmouth Bass <15 EAST East Sector 11/3/2017 Chinook Salmon < 15 11/22/2017 Brown Trout < 15 GREECE 1 6/9/2017 Salmon < 15 Control HAMLIN 1 Control 10/9/2017 Chinook Salmon < 15 10/9/2017 Pike < 15 I 0/9/2017 Rainbow Trout < 15 NORTH North Sector 2/22/20 17 Rainbow Trout <15 2/22/2017 White Bass < 15 2/23/2017 Freshwater Drum <15 2/23/20 17 Smallmouth Bass <15 10/20/2017 Lake Trout < 15 11/1 7/2017 Carp < 15 1

Control Locations include Greece, NY and Irondequoit, NY.

30

January 1 -December 31, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 Table B-3 Concentration of Gamma Emitters in Sediment (Results in units of pCi/kg (wet)+/- 2cr)

Sample Code Sample Date Gamma Emitters (Cs-137)

Shoreline EAST East Sector 4/27/2017 < 17 9/1 2/2017 < 17 EAST - BENTHIC 9/2 1/2017 < 17 East Sector GREECE 1 Control 4/27/2017 < 17 9/11/20 17 < 17 1

Control Location 31

January 1 -December 31, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 Table B-4 Concentration of lodine-131 in Filtered Air (Charcoal Cartridges)

(Results in units of 10-2 pCi/m3 +/- 2cr)

Start Date Stop Date STATION-02 STATION-04 STATION-07 STATION- STATION-09 STATION-11 Manor House Training West Fence 08 1 Webster Williamson Yard Center Li ne Seabreeze Parkin Lot 1/2/2017 1/9/2017 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 1/9/2017 1/1 6/2017 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 1/1 6/2017 1/23/2017 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 1/23/2017 1/30/2017 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 1/30/2017 2/6/2017 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 2/6/2017 2/1 3/2017 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 2/1 3/2017 2/20/2017 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 2/20/2017 2/27/2017 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 2/27/2017 3/6/2017 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 3/6/2017 3/1 3/2017 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 3/13/2017 3/20/2017 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 3/20/2017 3/27/2017 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 3/27/20 17 4/3/2017 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 3/6/20 17 3/1 3/2017 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 4/3/2017 4/1 0/2017 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 4/1 0/2017 4/1 7/2017 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 4/1 7/2017 4/24/2017 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 4/24/2017 5/1/2017 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 5/1 /2017 5/8/2017 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 5/8/2017 5/15/2017 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 5/1 5/2017 5/22/2017 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 5/22/2017 5/29/2017 < 0.002 2

< 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 5/29/2017 6/5/2017 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 6/5/2017 6/1 2/2017 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 6/1 2/2017 6/1 9/2017 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 6/1 9/2017 6/26/2017 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 6/26/2017 7/3/2017 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 7/3/2017 7/10/2017 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 7/1 0/2017 7/1 7/2017 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 7/17/2017 7/24/2017 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 7/24/2017 7/31/2017 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 8/7/2017 8/1 4/2017 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 8/1 4/2017 8/21/2017 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 8/2 1/2017 8/28/2017 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 8/28/20 17 9/4/2017 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 9/4/2017 9/11 /2017 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 9/11/2017 9/18/2017 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 9/1 8/2017 9/25/2017 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 9/25/20 17 10/2/2017 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 32

January 1 - December 31, 20 17 Docket Nos. 50-244 Table B-4 Concentration of Iodine-131 in Filtered Air (Charcoal Cartridges)

(Results in units of 10-2 pCi/m3 +/- 2cr)

Start Date Stop Date STATION-02 STATION-04 STATION-07 STATION- STATION-09 STATION-I I Manor House Training West Fence 08 1 Webster Will iamson Yard Center Li ne Seabreeze Parking Lot 10/2/2017 10/9/2017 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 10/9/2017 10/1 6/2017 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 10/1 6/20 17 10/23/2017 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 10/23/2017 10/30/2017 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 10/30/2017 11/6/2017 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 11/6/2017 11/1 3/2017 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 11/1 3/2017 11/20/2017 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 11/20/2017 11/27/2017 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 11/27/20 17 12/4/2017 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 12/4/2017 12/11/2017 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 12/1 1/2017 12/18/2017 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 12/1 8/2017 12/25/2017 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 12/25/2017 1/1 /2018 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 < 0.002 1

Control Location 2

Sampler malfunction/low flow 33

January 1 - December 31, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 Table B-5 Concentration of Beta Emitters in Air Particulates - Onsite Samples (Results in units of 10-2 pCi/m3 +/- 2cr Uncertainty)

Start Date Stop Date STATION-02 STATION-03 STATION-04 STATION-OS STATION-06 STATION-07 STATION-13 Manor House East Field Training Center Creek Bridge Main Parking West Fence Substation 13 Yard Parking Lot Lot Line 1/2/2017 1/9/2017 1.7 +/- 0.1 1.8 +/- 0. 1 1.9 +/- 0.2 1.7 +/- 0.1 1.7 +/- 0.1 1.8 +/- 0.2 1.6 +/- 0.1 1/9/2017 1/16/2017 2.5 +/- 0.1 2.4 +/- 0.1 2.5 +/- 0.2 2.4 +/- 0. 1 2.7 +/- 0.1 2.7 +/- 0.2 2.3 +/- 0.1 1/16/2017 1/23/2017 1.4 +/- 0. 1 l.4 +/- 0. 1 1.6 +/- 0.2 l.5 +/- 0. 1 1.5 +/- 0. 1 1.7 +/- 0.2 1.4 +/- 0.1 1/23/2017 1/30/2017 1.6 +/- 0.1 l.7 +/- 0.1 1.7 +/- 0.2 l.5 +/- 0.1 1.6 +/- 0. 1 1.8 +/- 0.2 1.5 +/- 0.1 1/30/2017 2/6/2017 1.7 +/- 0.1 1.7 +/- 0.1 1.6 +/- 0.2 l.7 +/- 0.1 l.7 +/- 0.1 1.9 +/- 0.2 1.8 +/- 0.1 2/6/2017 2/13/2017 2.0 +/- 0. 1 2.2 +/- 0. 1 2.1 +/- 0.2 2.1 +/- 0. 1 2.0 +/- 0.1 2.2 +/- 0.2 2.0 +/- 0. 1 2/13/20 17 2/20/2017 2.6 +/- 0.1 2.3 +/- 0. 1 2.4 +/- 0.2 2.3 +/- 0.1 2.6 +/- 0. 1 2.7 +/- 0.2 2.1 +/- 0.1 2/20/2017 2/27/2017 2.0 +/- 0. 1 2.1 +/- 0.1 2.2 +/- 0.2 2.2 +/- 0.1 2.1 +/- 0. 1 2.3 +/- 0.2 2.1 +/- 0.1 2/27/2017 3/6/2017 2.4 +/- 0.1 2.5 +/- 0.1 2.6 +/- 0.2 2.5 +/- 0.1 2.6 +/- 0.1 2.7 +/- 0.2 2.2 +/- 0 .1 3/6/2017 3/13/2017 2.3 +/- 0. 1 2.2 +/- 0.1 2.3 +/- 0.2 2.2 +/- 0.1 2.1 +/- 0.1 2.4 +/- 0.2 1.6 +/- 0 .1 3/13/2017 3/20/2017 2.1 +/- 0.1 2.2 +/- 0. 1 2.3 +/- 0.2 2. 1 +/- 0. 1 2.2 +/- 0. 1 2.5 +/- 0.2 2. 1 +/- 0.1 3/20/2017 3/27/2017 2.2 +/- 0. 1 2.2 +/- 0. 1 2.1 +/- 0.2 2.1 +/- 0.1 2.1 +/- 0. 1 2.2 +/- 0.2 1.7 +/- 0.1 3/27/2017 4/3/2017 1.3 +/- 0.1 l.4+/-0.l 1.5 +/- 0.2 l.2 +/- 0.1 1.3 +/- 0. 1 1.4 +/- 0.2 1.3 +/- 0.1 4/3/2017 4/10/20 17 I.I +/- 0. 1 l.l +/- 0. 1 1.4 +/- 0.2 1.1 +/- 0.1 l.2 +/- 0.1 1.4 +/- 0.2 1.1 +/- 0.1 4/10/2017 4/17/2017 1.9 +/- 0.1 2.0 +/- 0.1 2.1 +/- 0.2 1.8 +/- 0.1 2.0 +/- 0.1 2.3 +/- 0.2 1.7 +/- 0.1 4/17/2017 4/24/2017 I. I +/- 0.1 1.2 +/- 0.1 1.5 +/- 0.2 1.2 +/- 0.1 1.2 +/- 0.1 1.4 +/- 0.2 1.1 +/- 0.1 4/24/2017 5/1/2017 1.2 +/- 0. 1 I. I +/- 0. 1 1.4 +/- 0.1 l. l +/- 0. 1 1.2 +/- 0.1 1.3 +/- 0.2 0.9 +/- 0.1 5/1/2017 5/8/2017 1.3 +/- 0. 1 1.2 +/- 0.1 1.3 +/- 0.2 1.2 +/- 0.1 1.1 +/- 0.1 1.5 +/- 0.2 1.0 +/- 0.1 5/8/2017 5/15/2017 0.9 +/- 0.1 0.8 +/- 0.1 1.0 +/- 0.1 0.8 +/- 0. 1 0.8 +/- 0. 1 1.2 +/- 0.2 0.7 +/- 0.1 5/15/2017 5/22/2017 1.8 +/- 0. 1 1.9 +/- 0.1 2.9 +/- 0.3 1.8 +/- 0.1 1.8 +/- 0.1 2.2 +/- 0.2 1.8 +/- 0.1 5/22/2017 5/29/2017 1.6 +/- 0. 1 l.7 +/- 0.1 1.5 +/- 0.1 1.6 +/- 0. 1 1.7 +/- 0.2 1.3 +/- 0.1 5/29/2017 6/5/2017 1.5 +/- 0.1 1.5 +/- 0.1 1.8 +/- 0 .2 1.3 +/- 0.1 1.4 +/- 0. 1 1.7 +/- 0.2 1.3 +/- 0.1 34

January 1 - December 31, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 Table B-5 Concentration of Beta Emitters in Air Particulates - Onsite Samples (Results in units of 10-2 pCi/m3 +/- 2cr Uncertainty)

Start Date Stop Date STATION-02 STATION-03 STATION-04 STATION-OS STATION-06 STATION-07 STATION-13 Manor House East Field Training Center Creek Bridge Main Parking West Fence Substation 13 Yard Parking Lot Lot Line 6/5/2017 6/12/2017 1.9 +/- 0.1 1.9 +/- 0.1 2.1 +/- 0.2 1.9 +/- 0.1 3.3 +/- 0.2 2.2 +/- 0.2 1.9 +/- 0.1 6/12/2017 6/19/2017 1.9 +/- 0.1 1.9 +/- 0.1 2.0 +/- 0. 1 1.8 +/- 0.1 1.5 +/- 0.1 2.1 +/- 0.2 1.7 +/- 0.1 6/19/2017 6/26/2017 1.4 +/- 0.1 1.4 +/- 0.1 1.3 +/- 0.1 1.3 +/- 0.1 1.3 +/- 0.1 1.5 +/- 0 .2 1.2 +/- 0 .1 6/26/2017 7/3/2017 1.7 +/- 0.1 1.7 +/- 0.1 1.6 +/- 0. 1 1.7 +/- 0.1 1.7 +/- 0 .1 1.8 +/- 0.2 1.6 +/- 0.1 7/3/2017 7/10/2017 2.4 +/- 0.1 2.0 +/- 0.1 2.0 +/- 0.1 1.9 +/- 0.1 1.8 +/- 0.1 1.6 +/- 0.1 2.3 +/- 0 .1 7/10/2017 7/17/2017 2.1 +/- 0.1 2.0 +/- 0.1 2.0 +/- 0. 1 2.1 +/- 0.1 2.1 +/- 0 .1 1.8 +/- 0 .1 1.9 +/- 0.1 7/17/2017 7/24/2017 2.6 +/- 0.1 3.0 +/- 0.2 2.8 +/- 0.2 2.6 +/- 0.1 2.8 +/- 0. 1 2.3 +/- 0 .1 2.2 +/- 0.1 7/24/2017 7/31/2017 1.4 +/- 0.1 1.6 +/- 0.2 1.3 +/- 0.2 1.4 +/- 0.1 1.4 +/- 0.1 1.1 +/- 0 .1 1.6 +/- 0.1 7/31/2017 8/7/2017 2.4 +/- 0.1 2.6 +/- 0.2 2.6 +/- 0.2 2.5 +/- 0.1 2.5 +/- 0 .1 2.1 +/- 0.1 2.5 +/- 0.1 8/7/2017 8/14/2017 2.6 +/- 0.1 3.0 +/- 0.2 2.9 +/- 0.2 2.7 +/- 0.1 2.8 +/- 0.2 2.3 +/- 0 .1 2.7 +/- 0.1 8/14/2017 8/21/2017 2.4 +/- 0.1 2.6 +/- 0.2 2.6 +/- 0.2 2 .3 +/- 0.1 2.4 +/- 0 .1 2.0 +/- 0 .1 2.4 +/- 0.1 8/21/2017 8/28/2017 1.9 +/- 0.1 2.3 +/- 0.2 2.1 +/- 0.1 2.0 +/- 0.1 2.0 +/- 0 .1 1.8 +/- 0.1 1.8 +/- 0.1 8/28/2017 9/4/2017 1.9 +/- 0.1 2.1 +/- 0.2 1.9 +/- 0.1 1.8 +/- 0.1 1.8 +/- 0 .1 1.6 +/- 0.1 1.9 +/- 0.1 9/4/2017 9/11/2017 1.6 +/- 0.1 1.9 +/- 0.2 1.6 +/- 0.1 1.4 +/- 0.1 1.4+/-0.1 1.2 +/- 0.1 1.4 +/- 0.1 9/11/2017 9/18/2017 3.6 +/- 0.2 4.3 +/- 0.3 3.7 +/- 0.2 3.6 +/- 0.2 4.1 +/- 0.2 3.3 +/- 0.2 3.8 +/- 0.2 9/18/2017 9/25/2017 4.0 +/- 0.2 4.3 +/- 0.3 4.1 +/- 0.2 3.1 +/- 0.1 4.1 +/- 0.2 3.7 +/- 0.2 4.2 +/- 0 .2 9/25/2017 10/2/2017 2.4 +/- 0.1 2.7 +/- 0.3 2.5 +/- 0.2 2.3 +/- 0.1 2.5 +/- 0.2 2.1 +/- 0.1 2.5 +/- 0 .1 10/2/2017 10/9/2017 2.7 +/- 0.1 3.1 +/- 0.2 2.9 +/- 0.1 2.8 +/- 0.1 3.l+/-0.1 2.4 +/- 0.1 2.8 +/- 0.1 10/9/2017 10/16/2017 2.1 +/- 0.1 2.4 +/- 0.2 2.2 +/- 0.1 2.1 +/- 0.1 2.2 +/- 0.1 2.0 +/- 0 .1 2.0 +/- 0.1 10/16/2017 10/23/2017 3.2 +/- 0.1 3.7 +/- 0.3 3.3 +/- 0.2 3. l+/-0.1 3.5 +/- 0.2 3.l+/-0.1 3.0 +/- 0.1 10/23/2017 10/30/2017 1.4 +/- 0.1 1.9 +/- 0.2 1.6 +/- 0.1 l.4+/-0.1 1.5 +/- 0.1 1.4 +/- 0.1 1.5 +/- 0.1 10/30/2017 11/6/2017 2.1 +/- 0.1 2.5 +/- 0.2 2.1 +/- 0.1 2.0 +/- 0.1 2.2 +/- 0.1 1.8 +/- 0.1 1.9 +/- 0.1 11/6/2017 11/13/2017 2.1 +/- 0.1 2.6 +/- 0.2 2.0 +/- 0.1 2.1 +/- 0.1 2.0 +/- 0.1 2.0 +/- 0.1 2.2 +/- 0.1 11/13/2017 11/20/2017 1.8 +/- 0.1 2.3 +/- 0.3 2.0 +/- 0.2 l.7 +/- 0.1 2.1 +/- 0.2 1.7 +/- 0.1 2.0 +/- 0.1 11/20/2017 11/27/2017 2.6 +/- 0.1 3.0 +/- 0.2 2.9 +/- 0.2 2.6 +/- 0.1 2.6 +/- 0.1 2.7 +/- 0.1 2.6 +/- 0.1 35

January 1 - December 31, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 Table B-5 Concentration of Beta Emitters in Air Particulates - Onsite Samples (Results in units of 10* 2 pCi/m3 +/- 2cr Uncertainty)

Start Date Stop Date STATION-02 STATION-03 STATION-04 STATION-05 STATION-06 STATION-07 STATION-13 Manor House East Field Training Center Creek Bridge Main Parking West Fence Substation 13 Yard Parking Lot Lot Line 11/27/2017 12/4/2017 3.0 +/- 0.1 3.2 +/- 0.2 3.2 +/- 0.2 3.0 +/- 0.1 3.1 +/- 0. 1 2.9 +/- 0.1 3.3 +/- 0 .2 12/4/2017 12/11/2017 2.6 +/- 0. 1 3. 1 +/- 0.2 2.8 +/- 0.2 2.5 +/- 0.1 2.9 +/- 0.1 2.6 +/- 0.1 2.4 +/- 0.1 12/11/2017 12/18/2017 1.8 +/- 0.1 2.0 +/- 0.2 1.7 +/- 0. 1 1.8 +/- 0.1 1.8 +/- 0.1 1.8 +/- 0. 1 1.9 +/- 0 .1 12/18/2017 12/25/2017 2.2 +/- 0. 1 2.8 +/- 0.2 2.3 +/- 0.1 2.3 +/- 0.1 2.3 +/- 0 .1 2.3 +/- 0.1 2.2 +/- 0.1 12/25/2017 1/1/2018 2.0 +/- 0.1 2.8 +/- 0.2 2.4 +/- 0.2 2.2 +/- 0.1 2.2 +/- 0.1 2.0 +/- 0.1 2 .3 +/- 0.1

'Sampler Malfunction/Low Flow. See Section 3.5 for additional information.

36

January 1 - December 31, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 Table B-6 Concentration of Beta Emitters in Air Particulates - Offsite Samples (Results in units of 10-2 pCi/m3 +/- 2cr Uncertainty)

Start Date Stop Date STATION- STATION- STATION- STATION- STATION-08 1 09 10 1 11 12 1 Seabreeze Webster Walworth Williamson Sodus Point 1/2/2017 1/9/2017 1.8 +/- 0. I 1.6 +/- 0. 1 1.7 +/- 0. I 1.7 +/- 0.1 1.7 +/- 0. 1 1/9/2017 1/16/2017 2.5 +/- 0.1 2. 1 +/- 0.1 2.3 +/- 0.1 2.2 +/- 0 .1 2.6 +/- 0.1 1/16/2017 1/23/2017 1.6 +/- 0.1 1.5 +/- 0.1 1.3 +/- 0.1 1.4 +/- 0.1 1.4 +/- 0. 1 1/23/2017 1/30/2017 1.6 +/- 0.1 1.3 +/- 0.1 1.4 +/- 0.1 1.4 +/- 0.1 1.6 +/- 0 .1 1/30/2017 2/6/20 17 1.9 +/- 0.1 1.8 +/- 0.1 1.7 +/- 0 .1 1.8 +/- 0 . 1 1.8 +/- 0.1 2/6/20 17 2/ 13/2017 2.2 +/- 0. 1 2.0 +/- 0.1 2.0 +/- 0.1 2.2 +/- 0 .1 2.3 +/- 0.1 2/13/2017 2/20/20 17 2.5 +/- 0.2 2.1 +/- 0 .1 2. 1 +/- 0. 1 2.2 +/- 0. 1 2.5 +/- 0.1 2/20/2017 2/27/2017 2.5 +/- 0. 2 2. 1 +/- 0.1 2.2 +/- 0. 1 2.2 +/- 0. 1 2.3 +/- 0.1 2/27/2017 3/6/20 17 2.4 +/- 0.1 2.1 +/- 0.1 2. 1 +/- 0.1 2.3 +/- 0.1 2.4 +/- 0. 1 3/6/2017 3/13/20 17 1.9 +/- 0. 1 1.8 +/- 0.1 1.7 +/- 0. 1 1.9 +/- 0.1 1.5 +/- 0. 1 3/13/2017 3/20/2017 2.3 +/- 0.1 1.9 +/- 0.1 2.0 +/- 0.1 2.3 +/- 0.1 2.3 +/- 0.1 3/20/2017 3/27/2017 2.0 +/- 0 .1 1.7 +/- 0.1 1.8 +/- 0.1 1.9 +/- 0.1 2. 1 +/- 0. 1 3/27/2017 4/3/20 17 1.5 +/- 0 .1 1.4 +/- 0.1 1.2 +/- 0.1 1.3 +/- 0. 1 1.4 +/- 0. 1 4/3/20 17 4/10/2017 1.3 +/- 0.1 1.2 +/- 0.1 1.2 +/- 0. 1 1.2 +/- 0 .1 1.4 +/- 0.1 4/10/20 17 4/17/20 17 2.2 +/- 0.2 1.9 +/- 0.1 1.8 +/- 0.1 1.9 +/- 0 .1 2.0 +/- 0. 1 4/17/2017 4/24/20 17 1.3 +/- 0.1 1.2 +/- 0.1 l.l +/- 0.1 1.2 +/- 0. 1 1.2 +/- 0. 1 4/24/2017 5/1/2017 1.2 +/- 0.1 I. I +/- 0. 1 I. I +/- 0. 1 I. I +/- 0. 1 1.2 +/- 0.1 5/1/20 17 5/8/2017 1.2 +/- 0.1 1.0 +/- 0.1 l.l +/- 0.1 I. I +/- 0 .1 I. I +/- 0. 1 5/8/20 17 5/15/20 17 1.0 +/- 0.1 0.9 +/- 0. 1 0.9 +/- 0.1 0.9 +/- 0.1 0.8 +/- 0.1 5/15/2017 5/22/2017 2.2 +/- 0.1 1.9 +/- 0.1 1.8 +/- 0 .1 1.8 +/- 0 .1 2.0 +/- 0 .1 5/22/2017 5/29/2017 1.9 +/- 0.1 1.6 +/- 0.1 1.6 +/- 0.1 1.6 +/- 0 .1 1.5 +/- 0 .1 5/29/2017 6/5/20 17 1.6 +/- 0.1 1.5 +/- 0.1 1.3 +/- 0.1 1.4 +/- 0.1 1.4 +/- 0. 1 6/5/20 17 6/12/20 17 2.4 +/- 0.2 2.2 +/- 0 .1 2. 0 +/- 0.1 2.0 +/- 0.1 2. 1 +/- 0. 1 6/12/20 17 6/19/2017 2.0 +/- 0.1 1.7 +/- 0.1 1.7 +/- 0. 1 1.9 +/- 0. 1 1.7 +/- 0 . 1 6/19/2017 6/26/2017 1.3 +/- 0.1 1.3 +/- 0.1 1.2 +/- 0.1 I. I +/- 0 .1 1.2 +/- 0.1 6/26/2017 7/3/20 17 2.0 +/- 0.1 2.0 +/- 0.1 1.7 +/- 0.1 1.8 +/- 0 .1 1.6 +/- 0.1 7/3/2017 7/10/2017 2.3 +/- 0.1 2.6 +/- 0.2 2.5 +/- 0.2 2. 1 +/- 0.1 1.9 +/- 0.1 7/10/2017 7/17/2017 2.0 +/- 0.1 2.2 +/- 0.1 2.2 +/- 0.1 2.2 +/- 0 .1 2.0 +/- 0.1 7/17/2017 7/24/20 17 2.4 +/- 0.1 2.5 +/- 0.1 2.7 +/- 0.1 2.5 +/- 0.1 2.2 +/- 0 .1 7/24/2017 7/31/2017 1.9 +/- 0.1 2.0 +/- 0.1 1.8 +/- 0.1 1.8 +/- 0. 1 1.6 +/- 0.1 7/31/2017 8/7/20 17 2.5 +/- 0.1 2.7 +/- 0.1 2.7 +/- 0.2 2. 5 +/- 0 .1 2.5 +/- 0 .1 8/7/2017 8/14/2017 3.0 +/- 0.1 2.9 +/- 0.1 3.2 +/- 0.2 2.9 +/- 0.2 2.7 +/- 0.1 8/14/20 17 8/21/2017 2.6 +/- 0.1 2.6 +/- 0.1 3.0 +/- 0.2 2.6 +/- 0.1 2.4 +/- 0 .1 8/21/201 7 8/28/2017 1.7 +/- 0.1 1.7 +/- 0.1 1.7 +/- 0.1 1.8 +/- 0.1 1.6 +/- 0 .1 8/28/2017 9/4/20 17 1.9 +/- 0.1 1.9 +/- 0.1 2.0 +/- 0.1 1.9 +/- 0.1 1.7 +/- 0.1 9/4/2017 9/11/2017 1.5 +/- 0.1 1.4 +/- 0.1 1.6 +/- 0.1 1.4 +/- 0.1 1.4 +/- 0 .1 9/11/20 17 9/18/2017 4.0 +/- 0.2 3.9 +/- 0.2 3.7 +/- 0.2 3.7 +/- 0.2 3.7 +/- 0 .2 9/18/2017 9/25/2017 4.5 +/- 0.2 4.5 +/- 0.2 3.4 +/- 0 .1 3.1 +/-0.1 4.1 +/- 0.2 9/25/2017 10/2/2017 2.6 +/- 0.1 2.6 +/- 0.1 2.6 +/- 0.2 2.5 +/- 0.1 2.4 +/- 0.1 37

January 1 - December 31, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 Table B-6 Concentration of Beta Emitters in Air Particulates - Offsite Samples (Results in units of 10* 2 pCi/m3 +/- 2cr Uncertainty)

Start Date Stop Date STATION- STATION- STATION- STATION- STATION-08 1 09 10' 11 12 1 Seabreeze Webster Walworth Williamson Sodus Point 10/2/2017 10/9/2017 3. 1 +/- 0.2 3.0 +/- 0.1 3.2 +/- 0.2 3.1 +/- 0.1 2.8 +/- 0.1 10/9/2017 10/16/2017 2.3 +/- 0.1 2.3 +/- 0.1 2.5 +/- 0.2 2. l+/- 0.1 2.0 +/- 0.1 10/16/2017 10/23/2017 3.1 +/-0.1 3. 1 +/- 0.1 3.5 +/- 0.2 3.1 +/- 0. 1 2.9 +/- 0. 1 10/23/2017 10/30/2017 1.5 +/- 0.1 1.7 +/- 0.1 1.7 +/- 0.1 1.6 +/- 0.1 1.4 +/- 0.1 10/30/2017 11/6/2017 2.1 +/- 0.1 2.2 +/- 0.1 2.2 +/- 0.1 2.0 +/- 0.1 2.1 +/- 0.1 11/6/2017 11/13/2017 2.2 +/- 0.1 2.3 +/- 0. 1 2.4 +/- 0.1 2.1 +/- 0.1 2. 1 +/- 0.1 11/1 3/20 17 11/20/2017 2.2 +/- 0.1 2.0 +/- 0.1 2.2 +/- 0.2 2.2 +/- 0. 1 2.1 +/- 0.1 11/20/2017 11/27/2017 2.8 +/- 0.1 2.6 +/- 0.1 2.9 +/- 0.2 2.8 +/- 0.1 2.5 +/- 0. 1 11/27/2017 12/4/2017 3.6 +/- 0.2 3.4 +/- 0.2 3.6 +/- 0.2 3.5 +/- 0.2 3.3 +/- 0.2 12/4/2017 12/ 11/2017 2.3 +/- 0.1 2.3 +/- 0. 1 2.6 +/- 0.1 2.5 +/- 0.1 2.2 +/- 0.1 12/11/2017 12/18/2017 1.7 +/- 0.1 1.4 +/- 0.1 1.9 +/- 0.1 1.7 +/- 0.1 1.7 +/- 0.1 12/18/2017 12/25/2017 2.3 +/- 0.1 2.2 +/- 0.1 2.3 +/- 0.1 2.2 +/- 0.1 2.3 +/- 0. 1 12/25/2017 1/1/2018 2.2 +/- 0.1 2.3 +/- 0.1 2.5 +/- 0.1 2.5 +/- 0.1 2.5 +/- 0. 1 1

Control Location 38

January 1 - December 31, 20 17 Docket Nos. 50-244 Table B-7 Concentration of Gamma Emitters in Air Particulates (Results in units of 10- 3 pCi/m3 +/- 2cr)

Location Description Sample Date Gamma Emitters (Cs-137) (1-131)

STATION-02 Manor House Yard 4/3/20 17 < 1.8 < 0.002 7/3/20 17 < 1.8 < 0.002 10/2/20 17 < 1.8 < 0.002 1/1/20 18 < 1.8 < 0.002 STATION-03 East Field 4/3/20 17 < 1.8 < 0.002 7/3/20 17 < 1.8 < 0.002 10/2/20 17 < 1.8 < 0.002 1/1/20 18 < 1.8 < 0.002 Training Center STATION-04 Parki ng Lot 4/3/20 17 < 1.8 < 0.002 7/3/20 17 < 1.8 < 0.002 10/2/2017 < 1.8 < 0.002 1/1 /20 18 < 1.8 < 0.002 STATION-OS Creek Bridge 4/3/20 17 < 1.8 < 0.002 7/3/201 7 < 1.8 < 0.002 10/2/2017 < 1.8 < 0.002 1/1/2018 < 1.8 < 0.002 STATION-06 Mai n Parking Lot 4/3/2017 < 1.8 < 0.002 7/3/20 17 < 1.8 < 0.002 10/2/2017 < 1.8 < 0.002 1/1/2018 < 1.8 < 0.002 STATION-07 West Fence Line 4/3/20 17 < 1.8 < 0.002 7/3/20 17 < 1.8 < 0.002 10/2/2017 < 1.8 < 0.002 1/1/20 18 < 1.8 < 0.002 STATION-08 1 Seabreeze 4/3/20 17 < 1.8 < 0.002 7/3/20 17 < 1.8 < 0.002 10/2/20 17 < 1.8 < 0.002 1/1/2018 < 1.8 < 0.002 STATION-09 Webster 4/3/20 17 < 1.8 < 0.002 7/3/2017 < 1.8 < 0.002 10/2/2017 < 1.8 < 0.002 1/1/201 8 < 1.8 < 0.002 STATION- 10 1 Walworth 4/3/20 17 < 1.8 < 0.002 7/3/20 17 < 1.8 < 0.002 10/2/20 17 < 1.8 < 0.002 1/1/2018 < 1.8 < 0.002 39

January 1 - December 31, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 Table B-7 (Continued)

Concentration of Gamma Emitters in Air Particulates (Results in units of 10- 3 pCi/m3 +/- 2cr)

Location Description Sample Date Gamma Emitters (Cs- 137) (I-131)

STATION-II Williamson 4/3/20 17 < 1.8 < 0.002 7/3/2017 < 1.8 < 0.002 10/2/2017 < 1.8 < 0.002 1/1/2018 < 1.8 < 0.002 STATION-12 1 Sodus Poi nt 4/3/20 17 < 1.8 < 0.002 7/3/20 17 < 1.8 < 0.002 10/2/2017 < 1.8 < 0.002 1/ 1/2018 < 1.8 < 0.002 STATION-13 Substation 13 4/3/20 17 < 1.8 < 0.002 7/3/2017 < 1.8 < 0.002 10/2/2017 < 1.8 < 0.002 1/1/2018 < 1.8 < 0.002 1

Control Location 40

January 1 - December 31, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 Table B-8 Concentration of Gamma Emitters in Vegetation Samples (Results in units of pCi/kg (wet)+/- 2a)

Sample Code Sample Date Sample Type Gamma Emitters (Cs-137) (1-13 1)

CONTROL1 Local Sites in Control Sectors 8/31/2017 Onion (root) < 27 <20 8/31/2017 Squash < 27 <20 8/31/2017 Tomato < 27 < 20 8/31/2017 Tuber (potato) < 27 < 20 9/5/2017 Pears < 27 <20 10/5/2017 Apples < 27 <20 10/5/2017 Grapes < 27 < 20 EAST East Sector 7/6/2017 Greens < 27 < 20 8/9/2017 Onion (root) < 27 < 20 8/9/2017 Tomato < 27 < 20 8/29/2017 Squash < 27 < 20 8/29/2017 Tuber (potato) < 27 < 20 9/22/2017 Grapes < 27 < 20 ESE East South East Sector 7/6/2017 Greens < 27 <20 8/1/2017 Onion (root) < 27 < 20 8/1/2017 Tuber (potato) < 27 < 20 8/9/2017 Tomato < 27 < 20 9/22/2017 Grapes < 27 <20 LIMA 1 Control 8/3 1/2017 Greens < 27 <20 SSE South South East Garden 6/30/2017 Greens < 27 < 20 8/1/2017 Chard < 27 < 20 8/9/2017 Onion (root) < 27 < 20 8/9/2017 Squash < 27 <20 8/9/2017 Tuber (potato) < 27 < 20 8/29/2017 Cabbage < 27 <20 8/29/20 17 Tomato < 27 < 20 9/14/2017 Apples < 27 < 20 9/18/2017 Pears < 27 < 20 1 Control Location 41

January 1 - December 31, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 Table B-9 Concentration of Gamma Emitters (including 1-131) in Milk (Results in units of pCi/Liter +/- 2cr)

Sample Code Sample Date Gamma Emitters Cs- 137 (1- 13 1)

EATON ESE Supplemental 1/17/2017 < 0.4 <0.0 1 2/13/2017 < 0.4 < 0.01 3/1 3/2017 < 0.4 < 0.0 1 4/1 0/20 17 < 0.4 < 0.0 1 5/8/2017 < 0.4 < 0.01 6/5/2017 < 0.4 < 0.0 1 6/19/2017 < 0.4 < 0.01 6/29/2017 < 0.4 < 0.01 7/5/2017 < 0.4 <0.01 7/17/2017 < 0.4 <0.0 1 7/31/2017 < 0.4 < 0.01 8/1 4/20 17 < 0.4 < 0.01 8/28/2017 < 0.4 < 0.01 9/1 1/2017 < 0.4 < 0.01 9/25/2017 < 0.4 < 0.01 10/9/2017 < 0.4 < 0.01 10/23/2017 < 0.4 < 0.0 1 11/20/20 17 < 0.4 < 0.01 12/1 8/2017 < 0.4 <0.01 SCHULTZ' South Sodus Control 1/17/2017 < 0.4 < 0.01 2/13/20 17 < 0.4 < 0.01 3/1 3/2017 < 0.4 < 0.01 4/10/2017 < 0.4 < 0.0 1 5/8/2017 < 0.4 <0.0 1 6/5/2017 < 0.4 < 0.01 6/19/2017 < 0.4 <0.0 1 6/29/20 17 < 0.4 <0.0 1 7/5/20 17 < 0.4 < 0.01 7/17/2017 < 0.4 < 0.01 7/31/2017 < 0.4 < 0.0 1 8/14/2017 < 0.4 <0.01 8/28/2017 < 0.4 < 0.01 9/11/2017 < 0.4 <0.01 9/25/2017 < 0.4 < 0.01 10/9/2017 < 0.4 < 0.01 10/23/2017 < 0.4 < 0.01 11/20/2017 < 0.4 < 0.01 12/18/20 17 < 0.4 < 0.01 1

Control Location 42

January 1 - December 31, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 Table B-10 Typical MDA Ranges for Gamma Spectrometry Surface Shoreline Air Water, Ground- Vegetation Selected Fish (pCi/kg) Milk Oysters Sediment Soil (pCi/kg)

Particulates Drinking water (pCi/kg)

Nuclides Wet (pCi/L) (pCi/kg) (pCi/kg) Dry

( l 0* 2 pCi/m 3 ) Water (pCi/L) Wet Dry (pCi/L)

Na-22 0.04 - 0.3 3.1 - 5.1 6.4 - 50.5 3.5 - 5.6 5.2-7.8 14.6 - 22.5 43.6 - 68.2 45.9 - 89.8 13.9-36.1 K-40 0.2-5.0 33.4 - 58.8 54.3 - 338 38.6 - 63.4 42 - 58.9 127 - 180 300- 597 333 - 786 109 - 284 Cr-51 1.0- 15.3 26.1-41 67 .2 - 886 28 - 38.4 36.5 - 49.0 110 - 222 669 - 2723 522 - 2374 86.8 - 246 Mn-54 0.04-0.3 2.8 - 4.5 2.7 - 42.2 3.3 - 4.9 3.9 - 5.7 12.0 - 18.8 40.7 - 63.2 44.6 - 90.5 11.3 - 28.9 Co-58 0.07 -0.6 2.9 - 4.8 6.2 - 56.5 3.4 - 4.9 4.2 - 5.9 12.7 - 22.6 54.3 - 120 56.5 - 128 11.4 - 29.9 Fe-59 0.26- 2.1 6.8 - 10.7 21.7 - 192 7.6 - 10.7 11 - 14.7 33.7 - 61.6 137-437 136 - 400 30.2 - 71 Co-60 0.03 - 0.3 2.9 - 4.8 4.1 - 45 .7 3.5 - 5.3 4.7 - 6.9 14.0-21.1 38. 1 - 66.6 42.8 - 85.7 13.2 - 32.7 Zn-65 0.09-0.8 6.3 - 10 3.0- 124 6.7 - 11.4 10.3 - 16.l 29.9 - 46.8 121 - 187 117-251 29.3 - 70.3 Nb-95 0.1 - 1.4 3.4 - 5.3 6.5 - 105 3.8 - 5.6 4.6 - 6.5 14.9 - 29.8 91.8-291 81.3 -282 13.0 - 33.7 Zr-95 0.1 - I.I 5.2 - 8 5.7 - 111 5.9 - 8.4 7.3 - 9.9 21.6 - 37.8 102 - 216 91.8-244 20.4 - 52.8 Ru-106 0.3 - 2.3 24.9 - 38.9 20.9 - 355 29.l - 41.4 35.4 - 46.5 105 - 156 346 - 498 345-719 98.5 - 242 Ag-llOm 0.03 - 0.3 2.7 - 4.3 3.8-39.l 3. l - 4.3 3.9 - 5.1 11.6-16.5 39 - 59.7 45 .6 - 92.8 10.9 - 26.9 1-131 I 0.4 - 6.1 1.5 - 11.6 22 - 21660 5.2 - 9.8 .3 - 9.5 33.6 -178 2180 - 79943 180 - 39606 7.3 - 89.6 Cs-134 0.03-0.2 2.7 - 4.2 2.9 - 35.2 3 - 4.5 3.7 - 5.1 11.3 - 16.4 40.7 - 52.3 40.3 - 80.2 10.7 - 26.8 Cs-137 0.03-0.2 3 - 4.7 7.9 - 44.8 3.4 - 4.9 4.1 - 5.7 12.l - 17.l 36.3 - 56.7 39.7 - 87.8 11.4 - 30.2 Ba-140 0.4 - 196 6.5 - 11.6 25 .2 - 1718 6.6 - 10.6 6.9 - 10.9 27.6 - 98.8 696 - 7088 151-4732 16.7-70.1 La-140 0.4 - 196 6.5 - 11.6 25.2-1718 6.6 - 10.6 6.9 - 10.9 27.6 - 98.8 696 - 7088 151 - 4732 16.7-70.1 Ce-144 0.1 - 1.1 14.2 - 23.3 6.1 - 159 16.4 - 23.4 20.3 - 28.3 45.4 - 73 .2 168 - 231 145 - 360 40.8 - 102 1

This MDA range for 1-131 on a charcoal cartridge is typically 3.94 x I 0-3 to 6.10 x I 0-2 pCi/m 3 43

January 1 - December 31, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 Table B-11 Typical LLDs for Gamma Spectrometry Air Surface Water, Selected Fish pCi/kg Groundwater Oysters pCi/kg Precipitation Soil pCi/kg Vegetation Particulates Drinking Water Nuclides (wet) pCi/L (wet) pCi/L (dry) pCi/kg (wet) 10*3 pCi/m3 pCi/L Na-22 2.9 2.9 22 2.9 22 2.9 24 35 Cr-51 12 17 88 17 88 17 110 162 Mn-54 2.1 2.4 17 2.4 17 2.4 18 27 Co-58 2 2.4 16 2.4 16 2.4 17 25 Fe-59 4.6 5.2 37 5.2 37 5.2 38 60 Co-60 2.7 2.8 22 2.8 22 2.8 21 33 Zn-65 2.8 5.6 23 5.6 23 5.6 54 66 Nb-95 1.9 2.2 15 2.2 15 2.2 18 25 Zr-95 3.3 3.8 27 3.8 27 3.8 29 44 Ru-106 17 20 135 20 135 20 146 223 Ag-1 lOm 1.8 2.1 14 2.1 14 2.1 16 25 Te-129m 20 26 149 26 149 26 180 265 I-131

1.5 2 11 2 11 2 14 20 Cs-134 1.9 2.2 15 2.2 15 2.2 20 24 Cs-137 1.8 2.3 15 2.3 15 2.3 17 27 Ba-140 6.1 7.3 48 7.3 48 7.3 54 80 La-140 3.4 4.1 26 4.1 26 4.1 25 41 Ce-144 5.5 12 43 12 43 12 75 101

The LLD for 1-131 measured on a charcoal cartridge is 2.0 x I 0*3 pCi/m 3 44

January 1 - December 31, 2017 Docket Nos . 50-244 Table B-12 Direct Radiation (Results in Units of mR/90 days +/- lcr) ta1ion Location First Second Third Fourth Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter 2 Onsite-Manor House Yard 13.2 +/- 0.6 13. 1 +/- 1.0 12.0 +/- 0.8 11.8 +/- 0.5 3 Onsite-In field approx imately 200 ft SE of station #2 13.5 +/- 0.7 12.8 +/- 0.4 12.7 +/- 0.8 12.8 +/- 0.5 4 Ons ite-Train ing Center yard driveway circle 13.0 +/- 0 .5 12.4 +/- 0.8 11.J +/- 0.9 11.4 +/- 0.5 5 Onsite-Between creek and plant entry road 13.6 +/- 0.6 13.0 +/- 0.8 11.5 +/- 0.8 1 J.8 +/- 0.6 6 Onsite-SW side of plant parking lot 12.7 +/- 0.9 9.9 +/- 0.5 8.8 +/- 0.6 9.4 +/- 0.5 7 Onsite-uti lity pole along West plant fence 13.5 +/- 0.5 11.2 +/- l.O 10.6 +/- 0.7 11.2 +/- 0.6 8' Topper Dri ve-Irondeq uoi t, Seabreeze Substation #51 12.6 +/- 0.9 11.6 +/- 0.4 10.6 +/- 0.9 10.6 +/- 0.6 Ph illi ps Road-Webster, intersection with Highway 9 12.3 +/- 0.6 11.3 +/- 0.4 10.4 +/- 0.7 10.7 +/- 0.8

104 , Substation #74 lQ I Atlantic Avenue-Walworth, Substation #230 11.7 +/- 0.5 10.4 +/- 0.5 9.5 +/- 0.6 9.9 +/- 0.7 11 W. Main Street-Wi ll iamson, Substation #207 12.0 +/- 0.6 10.7 +/- 0.6 9.9 +/- 0.7 10.3 +/- 0.5 12 12 Seaman Avenue-Sodus Point-Off Lake Road by I 12.8 +/- 0.5 11.7 +/- 0.7 11.3 +/- J.O 11.7 +/- 0.7 Sewer district, Substation #209 13 Onsite- South of Meteorological Tower 22.1 +/- 0.9 19.7 +/- 1.1 18.0 +/- 1.4 18.8 +/- 0.9 14 NW corner of field along lake shore 13.1 +/- 0.8 12.5 +/- 0.7 12.2 +/- l.2 12.2 +/- 0.7 Field access road, west of orchard, approximately 15 14.3 +/- 0.7 12.9 +/- 0.6 13.1 +/- 1.0 13.1 +/- 0.5 3000' West of plant 45

January 1 - December 31, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 TABLE B-12 (Continued)

Direct Radiation (Results in Units of mR/90 days+/- lcr)

Station First Second Third Fourth Location Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter SW Corner of orchard, approximately 3000' West 16 14.0 +/- 0.7 12.9 +/- 0.3 12.5 +/- 1.0 12.8 +/- 0.6 of plant, approximately 200' North of Lake Road Utility pole in orchard, approximately 75" North of 17 14. 1 +/- 0.6 12.2 +/- 0.5 12.3 +/- 0.8 11.9 +/- 0.5 Lake Road Approx imately 30' North of NE corner of 18 12.1 +/- 0.6 L0.4 +/- 0.4 9.6 +/- 0.7 10.2 +/- 0.4 Substation 13A fence On NW corner of house I 00' East of plant access 19 11.8 +/- 0.5 10.0 +/- 0.7 9.2 +/- 0.6 9.6 +/- 0.9 road Approximately 150' West of Ontario Center Road 20 12.7 +/- 0.7 12.9 +/- I. I 11.6 +/- 1.0 11.9 +/- 0.5 and approximately 170' South of Lake Road North side of Lake Road , approximately 200' East 21 12.9 +/- 0.7 12. 1 +/- 0.7 11.5 +/- 0.8 11.7 +/- 0.5 of Ontario Center Road 22 North side of Lake Road, SE, property owner 12.7 +/- I.I 11.0 +/- 0.4 L0.2 +/- 0.8 I 1.1 +/- 0.5 East property line, midway between Lake Road and 23 14.1 +/- l.l 12.1 +/- 0.3 11.9 +/- 0.8 11.9 +/- 0.5 Lake shore 24 Lake shore near NE corner of property 13.4 +/- 0 .6 12.5 +/- 0.6 11.7 +/- 0.8 12.3 +/- 0.8 25 Substation #73 , Klem Road , adjacent to 897 Klem I 11.6 +/- 0.6 10.9 +/- 0.6 10.4 +/- 0.8 10.5 +/- 0.5 Road 1

26 Service Center, Plank Road , West of 250 I 1.0 +/- 0.5 9.7 +/- 0.8 9.7 +/- 0 .7 9.0 +/- 0.5 Atlantic Avenue at Knollwood Drive utility pole, 27 I 11.8 +/- 0.5 11.2 +/- I. I L0.3 +/- 0.8 10.3 +/- 0.5 North side of road 28 Substation #193 , Marion, behind Stanton Ag.

I 12.2 +/- 0.8 10.9 +/- 0.4 L0.2 +/- 0.7 L0.4 +/- 0.6 Service, North Main Street 46

January 1 - December 31, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 TABLE B-12 (Continued)

Direct Radiation (Results in Units of mR/90 days+/- lG)

Location First Second Third Fourth rter rter r r 29 Substation #208 , Town Line Road (CR-118) , 1000' I 12.3 +/- 0.9 10.8 +/- 0.4 9.6 +/- 0.7 10.0 +/- 0.6 North of Route 104 30 I District Office, Sodus, on pole, West side of bldg 11. l +/- 0.5 10.2 +/- 0.4 9.0 +/- 0.7 9.3 +/- 0.5 Lake Road , pole 20' North of road, 500' East of Salt 31 14.0 +/- 0.5 12.6 +/- 0.5 11.7 +/- l.O 12.2 +/- 0.5 Road Woodard Road at County Line Road, pole @ BW 32 11.7 +/- 0.5 11 .4 +/- 0.5 10.0 +/- 0.9 10.5 +/- 0.6 corner County Line Road at RR tracks, pole approximately 33 11.3 +/- 0.7 10.3 +/- 0.4 8. 1 +/- 0.6 10.0 +/- 0.5 100' East along tracks Lincoln Road, pole midway between Ridge Road 34 13.4 +/- 0.8 13.9 +/- 0.6 12.4 +/- l.O 12.7 +/- 0.8 and Route 104 Transmission Right of Way, North of Clevenger 35 12.9 +/- 0.5 12.2 +/- 0.4 11.7 +/- 0.7 I l.5 +/- 0.5 Road on pole Substation #205 , Route I04, East of Ontario Center 36 l l.9 +/- 0.8 I I. I +/- 0.4 10.9 +/- 0.7 9.9 +/- 0.6 Road, North side of fence 37 Rail Road Avenue, pole at 2048 11.6 +/- 0.5 10.7 +/- 0.5 9.4 +/- 0.8 9.5 +/- 0.8 38 Fisher Road at RR Tracks, pole Ea t of road 14.1 +/- 0.6 12.3 +/- 0.4 12.1 +/- 0.8 11.9 +/- 0.5 Seeley Road , Pole South side 100' West of 39 12.4 +/- 0.6 12.1 +/- 0.6 11.8 +/- 0.8 11.3 +/- 0.7 intersection with Stony Lonesome Road Lake Road at Stoney Lonesome Road , pole at SE 40 I l.4 +/- 0.5 10.5 +/- 0.6 9.7 +/- 0.9 10.l +/- 0.5 corner 63 Westside of warehouse access road 13.8 +/- 1.0 12.6 +/- 0.4 11.8 +/- 0.8 12.4 +/- 0.5 64 Westside of direct road, adjacent to orchard 14.8 +/- 0.5 14. l +/- 0.4 13.4 +/- 0.9 13.6 +/- 0.7 I - Control Location 47

January 1 - December 31 , 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 TABLEB-13 Groundwater Monitoring Wells Location Sample Date Tritium (pCi/1) Gamma 1 (uCi/ml)

GWOJ : Warehouse Access Road (Control) 3/23/2017 < 383 < 6.71E-09 6/15/2017 < 490 < 9.23E-09 9/27/201 7 < 457 < 7.50E-09 12/19/2017 < 443 < 8.65E-09 GW03: Screenhouse West, South Well 1/27/2017 <477 2/24/201 7 <402 3/23/2017 < 376 < 7.78E-09 4/23/20] 7 < 362 5/26/2017 < 364 6/1 5/2017 < 496 < 8.52E-09 7/20/2017 <430 8/20/20 17 < 373 9/27/2017 <451 < 7.38E-09 10/26/2017 <444 I l/30/20 17 < 389 12/19/20 17 < 453 < 8.50E-09 GW04 : Screenhouse West, North Well 3/23/2017 < 378 < 8.65E-09 6/1 5/20 17 <486 < 9.44E-09 9/27/20 17 <449 < 6.95E-09 12/19/2017 <444 < 8.02E-09 GW05: Screenhouse East, South (I 5.5') 3/23/20 17 < 420 < 8.0lE-09 6/15/2017 < 496 < 8.32E-09 9/27/20 17 <449 < 8.06E-09 12/19/201 7 <444 < 8.13E-09 GW06: Screenhouse East, Middle (20.0') 3/23/20 17 < 453 < 7.3 1E-09 6/15/2017 < 493 < 9.84E-09 9/27/2017 < 44 1 < 6.15E-09 12/19/20 17 <441 < 9.59E-09 GW07 : Screenhouse East, North (24.0') 3/23/2017 < 419 < 9.0lE-09 6/1 5/20 17 < 490 < 7.72E-09 9/27/2017 <439 < 6.46E-09 12/19/2017 < 448 < 7.82E-09 48

January 1 - December 31, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 TABLE B-13 (Continued)

Groundwater Monitoring Wells Location Sample Date Tritium (pCi/1) Gamma (uCi/ml)

GW08: All Volatiles Treatment Buildin£ 1/27/20 17 <476 2/24/2017 < 401 3/23/2017 < 376 < 5.74E-09 4/23/2017 < 362 5/26/2017 < 366 6/ 15/20 17 <456 < l.18E-08 7/20/2017 <427 8/20/20 17 < 370 9/27/20 17 <453 < 7.40E-09 10/26/2017 <446 11/30/2017 < 390 12/1 9/2017 <443 < 8.02E-09 GW I 0: Technical Support Center, South 3/23/20 17 < 373 < l .07E-08 6/15/2017 <494 < l.IOE-08 9/27/2017 < 449 < I .04E-08 I 2/1 9/20 I 7 < 390 < 9.59E-09 GW 11 : Southeast of Contam inated Service Building (CSB) 3/23/201 7 < 370 < 8.59E-09 6/15/2017 <458 < 7.87E-09 9/27/20 17 < 450 < 7.00E-09 12/20/20 17 < 44 1 < 8.05E-09 GW 12: West of Orchard Access Road 3/23/20 17 < 37 1 < 8.66E-09 6/15/2017 <460 < l .04E-08 9/27/2017 <442 < 8.4 1E-09 12/1 9/20 17 < 444 < l.04E-08 GW 13: North of Independent Spent Fuel Stora)1:e Install ation (ISFSI) 3/23/2017 < 373 < 7.64E-09 6/ 15/20 17 < 49 1 < 7.46E-09 9/27/20 17 <443 < 7.18E-09 12/19/20 17 < 44 1 < l.04E-08 GW 14: South of Cani ster Preparati on Building 3/23/20 17 < 379 < 9.35E-09 6/1 5/2017 <496 < 7.74E-09 9/27/2017 <444 < 8.49E-09 12/19/201 7 <445 < 8.93E-09 49

I January 1 - December 31, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 TABLE B-13 (Continued)

Groundwater Monitoring Wells Location sample Date Tritium (pCi/1) Gamma (uCi/ml)

GW 15 : West of Manor House 3/23/20 17 < 369 < l.14E-08 6/15/2017 <494 < l.1 lE-08 9/27/2017 < 44 1 < 8.08E-09 12/19/2017 < 442 < 8.99E-09 GW16: Southeast of Manor House 3/23/20 17 <372 < 7 .37E-09 6/15/2017 < 49 1 < 8.37E-09 9/27/20 17 <443 < l .05E-08 12/19/2017 < 441 < 8.45E-09 1

Gamma analysis is perfor med on a quarterly basis for ground water monitoring well results. Groundwater monitoring well s GW03 and GW08 are sampled monthl y due to their location being important fo r early detection of any tritium within the environment.

50

January 1 - December 31, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 APPENDIXC Quality Assurance Program Summary of Appendix C Content:

Appendix C is a summary of Exelon Industrial Services (EIS) laboratory's quality assurance program. It consists of Table C-1 which is a compilation of the results of the EIS laboratory's participation in an interlaboratory comparison program with Environmental Resource Associates (ERA) located in Arvada, Colorado and Eckert and Ziegler Analytics, Inc. (EZA) located in Atlanta, Georgia. It also includes Table C-2, which is a compilation of the results of the EIS laboratory's participation in a split sample program with Teledyne Brown Engineering located in Knoxville, Tennessee, and Table C-3, which is a list of typical MD As achieved by Teledyne Brown for Gamma Spectroscopy.

The EIS laboratory' s results contained in Table C-1 generally agree with the interlaboratory' s comparison results within the range of +/- 2cr of each other One analysis did not meet the specified acceptance criteria and is recorded in the EIS Corrective Action program. The Analytics Gross Beta in Water study for March 2017 was low and did not meet NRC Resolution Test Criteria while other crosschecks analyzed in the same batch were acceptable. The beaker used to concentrate the sample was rinsed again with IM Nitric acid and the residue was captured and analyzed indicating presence of additional Beta emitters, confirming the low result was directly due to insufficient transfer of concentrated sample to the planchet being analyzed. Subsequent to this event sample glassware is given a thorough rinse with IM Nitric acid to insure any residue dried on the beaker during the evaporation step is completely dissolved and transferred to the planchet. All crosscheck study results since have had improved recovery and pass NRC Resolution Test Criteria without further issue. In addition, all the sets of intercomparison results in the table are in full agreement when they were further evaluated using the NRC Resolution Test Criteria 1* The uncertainties for the EIS laboratory's results and Analytics' results are +/-2cr while the ERA laboratory's uncertainty is based on USEPA guidelin~s 2 .

All the results contained in Table C-2 agree within the range of+/- 2cr of each other with their respective EIS laboratory original, replicate and/or Teledyne Brown Engineering's split laboratory samples, except for the comparisons of one sample involving Cs-137 results: a tree leaves sample at IB6 Camp Conoy Entrance collected on 7/31/17 . The original and replicate analysis of the tree leaves sample from IB6 did not agree within +/- 2 cr of each other while the replicate and the split lab results did agree within

+/- 2 of each other. These minor discrepancies, which have been observed in previous reporting periods, are most probably due to counting statistics and/or the non-homogeneous nature of this type of sample.

Other samples whose nature generally preclude sample splitting are marked"**" in the Split Analysis column.

[1] NRC Inspection Manual, Inspection Procedure 84750, March 15, 1994

[2] National Standards for Water Proficiency Testing Studies Criteria Document, December 1998 51

January 1 - December 31, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 TABLE OF CONTENTS -ANALYTICAL RESULTS Table Title Page C-1 Results of Participation in Cross Check Program ........... ........ ........... .... ... .. ............. ... ..................... 53 C-2 Results of Quality Assurance Program ........................................ ....... ............................. ... .... ......... 55 C-3 Teledyne Brown Engineering's Typical MDAs for Gamma Spectrometry .......... ... .. .. ... ... .... ......... 62 52

January 1 - December 31, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 TABLE C-1 Results of Participation in Cross Check Program Reported Sample Type and Cross Check Lab Sample Date Isotope Observed Laboratory's Units Results Results 3/16/2017 Water-pCi/L Beta 2 17 I 279 3/16/2017 Cartridge- pCi/1 I-131 87 96.4 3/16/2017 Water-pCi/L H3 9860 9980 3/16/2017 Milk-pCi/1 I-131 103 97.9 Ce-141 165 145 Cr-51 299 290 Cs-134 118 120 Cs-137 165 140 Co-58 148 150 Mn-54 176 164 Fe-59 136 129 Zn-65 215 199 Co-60 192 183 4/10/2017 Water-pCi/L Ba-133 50.2 49.7 Cs-134 88.3 90.1 Cs-137 225.7 206 Co-60 59 .5 54.7 Zn-65 66.2 53.8 4/10/2017 Water-pCi/1 I-131 29.1 29.9 4/10/2017 Water-pCi/1 Beta 32.4 38.5 4/10/2017 Water-pCi/1 H3 7347 6850 6/8/20 17 Filter-pCi/Filter Ce-141 122 118 Cr-51 238 246 Cs- 134 129 147 Cs-137 121 117 Co-58 116 12 1 Mn-54 140 134 Fe-59 99 89.9 Zn-65 175 159 Co-60 144 149 6/8/2017 Water-pCi/L I-131 99 96.7 Ce-141 220 199 Cr-51 503 413 Cs-134 242 247 C -137 218 197 Co-58 222 204 Mn-54 255 225 Fe-59 170 151 Zn-65 307 267 Co-60 278 250 53

January 1 - December 31, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 TABLE C Continued Results of Participation in Cross Check Program Reported Sample Type and Cross Check Lab Sample Date Isotope Observed Laboratory's Units Results Results 6/8/2017 Water-pCi/1 Beta 242 249 7/10/2017 Water-pCi/1 H3 5305 5060 9/14/20 17 Water-pCi/1 H3 14900 14200 9/18/2017 Filter-pCi/Filter Cs-134 1334 1440 Cs-137 1050 954 Co-60 309 271 Zn-65 153 123 10/6/2017 Water-pCi/L Ba-133 76.2 73 .7 Cs-134 54.3 53 Cs-137 58.5 52.9 Co-60 74.9 69.5 Zn-65 411.5 348 10/6/2017 Water-pCi/L 1-131 25.9 24.2 12/7/2017 Water-pCi/1 Beta 284 265 12/7/2017 Cartridge - pCi 1-131 44 47.5 12/7/2017 Filter-pCi/Filter Ce-141 61.9 59.4 Cr-51 123 146 Cs-134 62.8 75.4 Cs-137 82.8 85.3 Co-58 50.l 54.3 Mn-54 97 97.1 Fe-59 69.6 68.5 Zn-65 124 127 Co-60 95.7 104 12/7/20 17 Milk-pCi/1 1-131 71.4 57.8 Ce-141 113 98.3 Cr-51 254 242 Cs-134 129 125 Cs-137 163 141 Co-58 89.5 89.9 Mn-54 184 161 Fe-59 127 I 13 Zn-65 218 211 Co-60 185 173 1 See discussion at the beginning of the Appendix 54

January 1 - December 31, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 TABLE C-2 Results of Quality Assurance Program Sample Type and Type of Result2 Original Replicate Split Sample Date Location CZ> Analysis Units Analysis Analysis Analysis Air Fi lter - A 1 1/9/20 17 Gross Beta pC i/m3 1.8 +/- 0.2 1.8 +/- 0.2 **

Air Filter - A2 1/9/20 17 Gross Beta pCi/m3 1.8 +/- 0.2 2.0 +/- 0.2 **

Air Fi lter - A3 1/9/20 17 Gross Beta pCi/m 3 1.8 +/- 0.2 1.8 +/- 0.2 **

Air Fi lter - A4 1/9/20 17 Gross Beta pCi/m 3 2.0 +/- 0.2 2.1 +/- 0.2 **

Air Filter - AS 3 2.0 +/- 0.2 **

1/9/20 17 Gross Beta pCi/m 1.9 +/- 0.2 Air Fil ter - SFA 1 1/9/20 17 Gross Beta pCi/m3 1.9 +/- 0.1 2.0 +/- 0.2 **

Ai r Filter - SFA2 1/9/20 17 Gross Beta pCi/m 3 1.9 +/- 0.2 2.1 +/- 0.2 **

Air Fi lter - SFA3 3 2.1 +/- 0.2 **

1/9/2017 Gross Beta pCi/m 1. 8 +/- 0.2 Air Fil ter - SFA4 1/9/20 17 Gross Beta pCi/m 3 1.8 +/- 0.2 2.0 +/- 0.2 **

Air Iodine - A l 1/9/20 17 1- 131 pCi/m 3

<MDA <MDA **

Ai r Iodine - A2 1/9/20 17 1-131 pCi/m3 <MDA <MDA **

Air Iodine - A3 1/9/20 17 1-131 pCi/m3 <MDA <MDA **

Air Fi lter - A l 2/13/20 17 Gross Beta pCi/m 3 2.6 +/- 0. 1 2.5 +/- 0. 1 **

Air Filter - A2 2/13/20 17 Gross Beta pCi/m 3 2.4 +/- 0.1 2.5 +/- 0.1 **

Air Filter - A3 2/13/20 17 Gross Beta pCi/m 3 2.3 +/- 0. 1 2.3 +/- 0.1 **

Air Filter - A4 2/13/20 17 Gross Beta pCi/m 3 2.7 +/- 0.1 2.6 +/- 0. 1 **

Air Fi lter - AS 2/13/2017 Gross Beta pCi/m 3 2.4 +/- 0.1 2.4 +/- 0. 1 **

Air Filter - SFA I 2/13/2017 Gross Beta pCi/m3 2.6 +/- 0.1 2.8 +/- 0. 1 **

Air Filter - SFA2 2/13/2017 Gross Beta pCi/m 3 2.6 +/- 0.1 2.6 +/- 0. 1 **

Air Filter - SFA3 2/13/201 7 Gross Beta pCi/m 3 2.4 +/- 0.1 2.4 +/- 0. 1 **

Air Filter - SFA4 2/13/20 17 Gross Beta pCi/m 3 2.6 +/- 0.1 2.4 +/- 0.1 **

Air Filter - Al 2/27/20 17 Gamma pCi/m3 <MDA <MDA <MDA Air Fi lter - A2 2/27/20 17 Gamma pCi/m3 <MDA <MDA <MDA Air Fi lter - A3 2/27/20 17 Gamma pCi/m3 <MDA <MDA <MDA Air Fi lter - A4 3 <MDA <MDA 2/27/20 17 Gamma pCi/m <MDA Air Filter - AS 3 <MDA <MDA 2/27/20 17 Gamma pCi/m <MDA Air Fi lter - SFA I 3 <MDA <MDA 2/27/20 17 Gamma pCi/m <MDA Air Fil ter - SFA2 2/27/20 17 Gamma pCi/m3 <MDA <MDA <MDA Air Fi lter - SFA4 2/27/20 17 Gamma pCi/m 3 <MDA <MDA <MDA Air Iodi ne - A 1 2/27/20 17 1-131 pCi/m 3

<MDA <MDA **

Air Iodine - A2 2/27/20 17 1-13 1 pCi/m 3

<MDA <MDA **

55

January 1 - December 31, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 TABLE C Continued Results of Quality Assurance Program Sample Type and Type of Result2 Original Replicate Split Sample Date Location <2> Analysis Units Analysis Analysis Analysis Air Iodine - A3 2/27/2017 1-1 3 1 pCi/m 3 <MDA <MDA **

Air Iodine - A4 2/27/20 17 1- 13 1 pCi/m 3 <MDA <MDA **

Air Iodine - AS 2/27/2017 1-13 1 pCi/m 3 <MDA <MDA **

Air Iodine - SFAl 2/27/20 17 1-1 3 1 pCi/m 3 <MDA <MDA **

Air Filter - Al 3/6/2017 Gross Beta pCi/m 3 l.7+/- 0.1 1.7 +/- 0.1 **

Air Filter - A2 3/6/20 17 Gross Beta pCi/m 3 1.7 +/- 0 .1 1.7 +/- 0 .1 **

Air Filter - A3 3/6/20 17 Gross Beta pCi/m 3 1.7 +/- 0.1 1.7 +/- 0 .1 **

Air Filter - A4 3/6/2017 Gross Beta pCi/m 3 1.9 +/- 0.1 2. 0 +/- 0 .1 **

Air Filter - AS 3/6/20 17 Gross Beta pCi/m 3 1.7 +/- 0. 1 1.7 +/- 0.1 **

Air Filter - SFAI 3/6/20 17 Gross Beta pCi/m 3 1.9 +/- 0.1 1.9 +/- 0.1 **

Air Filter - SFA2 3/6/2017 Gross Beta pCi/m 3 1.7 +/- 0 .1 1.8 +/- 0.1 **

Air Filter - SFA3 3/6/2017 Gross Beta pCi/m 3 1.7 +/- 0 .1 1.8 +/- 0.1 **

Air Filter - SFA4 3/6/2017 Gross Beta pCi/m 3 1.8 +/- 0 .1 1.8 +/- 0.1 **

Air Iodi ne - Al 4/3/2017 1- 131 pCi/m3 <MDA <MDA **

Air Iodine - A2 4/3/2017 1- 13 1 pCi/m 3

<MDA <MDA **

Air Iodine - A3 4/3/2017 1-131 pCi/m 3

<MDA <MDA **

Air Filter - A I 4/10/20 17 Gross Beta pCi/m 3 1.4 +/- 0.1 1.3 +/- 0.1 **

Air Filter - A2 4/10/2017 Gross Beta pCi/m 3 1.5 +/- 0 .1 1.3 +/- 0. 1 **

Air Filter - A3 4/10/2017 Gross Beta pCi/m 3 1.3 +/- 0 .1 1.3 +/- 0 .1 **

Air Filter - A4 4/10/2017 Gross Beta pCi/m 3 1.2 +/- 0. 1 J.4,+/-0.1 **

Air Filter - AS 4/10/2017 Gross Beta pCi/m 3 1.3 +/- 0.1 1.2 +/- 0.1 **

Air Fi lter - SFAI 4/10/2017 Gross Beta pCi/m3 1.2 +/- 0 .1 1.3 +/- 0 .1 **

Air Filter - SFA2 4/10/2017 Gross Beta pCi/m 3 1.4 +/- 0.1 1.5 +/- 0 .1 **

Air Filter - SFA3 4/10/2017 Gross Beta pCi/m 3 1.4 +/- 0.1 1.2 +/- 0.1 **

Air Filter - SFA4 4/10/2017 Gross Beta pCi/m 3 1.2 +/- 0.1 1.3 +/- 0 .1 **

Air Filter - Al 5/22/2017 Gross Beta pCi/m 3 1.9 +/- 0.1 1.7 +/- 0.1 **

Air Filter - A2 5/22/2017 Gross Beta pCi/m 3 1.9 +/- 0 .1 1.9 +/- 0 .1 **

Air Filter - A3 5/22/2017 Gross Beta pCi/m 3 1.9 +/- 0 .1 1.7 +/- 0.1 **

Air Filter - A4 5/22/2017 Gross Beta pCi/m3 2.0 +/- 0 .1 1.8 +/- 0.1 **

Air Filter - AS 5/22/2017 Gross Beta pCi/m 3 2.0 +/- 0.1 1.8 +/- 0.1 **

Air Filter - SFAI 5/22/2017 Gross Beta pCi/m 3 2.0 +/- 0 .1 2.0 +/- 0. 1 **

Air Filter - SFA2 5/22/2017 Gross Beta pCi/m 3 2.1 +/- 0 .2 2.0 +/- 0.2 **

56

January 1 - December 31, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 TABLE C Continued Results of Quality Assurance Program Sample Type and Type of Result2 Original Replicate Split Sample Date Location <2l Analysis Units Analysis Analysis Analysis Air Filter - SFA3 5/22/2017 Gross Beta pCi/m3 2.0 +/- 0.1 1.9 +/- 0. 1 **

Air Filter - SFA4 5/22/2017 Gross Beta pCi/m3 1.8 +/- 0.1 1.7 +/- 0.1 **

Air Iodine - A 1 6/12/2017 1-131 pCi/m3 <MDA <MDA **

Air Iodine - A2 6/12/2017 1-131 3 **

pCi/m <MDA <MDA Air Iodine - A3 6/12/2017 1-131 3 **

pCi/m <MDA <MDA Air Iodine - A4 6/12/2017 1-131 pCi/m 3 <MDA <MDA **

Air Iodine - A5 6/12/2017 1-131 pCi/m3 <MDA <MDA **

Air Iodine - SFA I 6/12/2017 1-131 pCi/m3 <MDA <MDA **

Bottom sed iment -

6/29/2017 Gamma pCi/kg <MDA <MDA <MDA WBS2 Bottom sediment -

6/29/2017 Gamma pCi/kg <MDA <MDA <MDA WBS4 Oysters - IA3 6/29/2017 Gamma pCi/kg <MDA <MDA <MDA Oysters - IA6 6/29/2017 Gamma pCi/kg <MDA <MDA <MDA 3

Air Filter - Al 7/3/2017 Gross Beta pCi/m 1.8 +/- 0.1 1.9 +/- 0.1 **

Air Filter - A2 7/3/2017 Gross Beta pCi/m 3 2.0 +/- 0.1 2.0 +/- 0.1 **

Air Filter - A3 7/3/2017 Gross Beta pCi/m 3 2.2 +/- 0.2 2. 1 +/- 0.2 **

Air Filter - A4 7/3/20 17 Gross Beta pCi/m3 2.2 +/- 0.2 2.3 +/- 0.2 **

Air Filter - A5 3 2.3 +/- 0.2 **

7/3/2017 Gross Beta pCi/m 2.1 +/- 0.1 Air Filter - SFAI 3 **

7/3/2017 Gross Beta pCi/m 2.0 +/- 0.1 2.0 +/- 0.1 Air Filter - SFA2 3 **

7/3/20 17 Gros Beta pCi/m 1.9 +/- 0.1 2.0 +/- 0.1 Air Filter - SFA3 7/3/2017 Gross Beta pCi/m 3 2.0 +/- 0.1 2.0 +/- 0.1 **

Air Filter - SFA4 7/3/2017 Gross Beta pCi/m 3 1.9 +/- 0.1 2.0 +/- 0. 1 **

Cabbage - IB7 7/25/2017 Gamma pCi/kg <MDA <MDA <MDA Collards - IB9 7/25/2017 Gamma pCi/kg <MDA <MDA <MDA Kale - IB8 7/25/2017 Gamma pCi/kg <MDA <MDA <MDA Bay Water - WAI 7/31/2017 Gamma pCi/L <MDA <MDA <MDA Bay Water - WA2 7/31/2017 Gamma pCi/L <MDA <MDA <MDA Tree Leaves - IB4 7/31/2017 Gamma pCi/kg <MDA <MDA <MDA Tree Leaves - IB5 7/31/2017 Gamma pCi/kg <MDA <MDA <MDA 1 81.l +/- 48.3 +/-

Tree Leaves - IB6 7/31/2017 Cs-137 pCi/kg 43.2 +/- 15.6 19.9 12.3 57

January 1 - December 31, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 TABLE C Continued Results of Quality Assurance Program Sample Type and Type of Original Replicate Split Sample Date Result Units Location <2> Analysis Analysis Analysis Analysis Air Filter - Al 8/14/2017 Gross Beta pCi/m3 1.8 +/- 0.1 1.8 +/- 0.1 **

Air Filter - A2 8/14/2017 Gross Beta pCi/m 3 1.9 +/- 0.2 2.0 +/- 0.2 **

Air Fi lter - A3 8/1 4/2017 Gross Beta pCi/m 3 2.0 +/- 0.1 2.0 +/- 0.1 **

Air Fi lter - A4 3 **

8/1 4/2017 Gross Beta pCi/m 2. 1 +/- 0.1 2.1 +/- 0.1 Air Fi lter - A5 3 **

8/14/2017 Gross Beta pCi/m 2.2 +/- 0.1 2. 1 +/- 0.1 Air Fi lter - SFAl 8/14/2017 Gross Beta pCi/m3 2.0 +/- 0.1 2. 1 +/- 0.1 **

Air Filter - SFA2 8/1 4/2017 Gross Beta pCi/m3 2.1 +/- 0.1 2.1 +/- 0. 1 **

Air Fi lter - SFA3 8/14/2017 Gross Beta pCi/m3 1.8 +/- o:1 1.9 +/- 0.1 **

Air Fi lter - SFA4 3 **

8/14/2017 Gross Beta pCi/m 1.8 +/- 0.1 1.9 +/- 0.1 Oysters - IA3 8/22/2017 Gamma pCi/kg <MDA <MDA <MDA Oysters - IA6 8/22/2017 Gamma pCi/kg <MDA <MDA <MDA Spanish Mackeral -

8/22/2017 Gamma pCi/kg <MDA <MDA <MDA IA2 Spanish Mackeral -

8/22/2017 Gamma pCi/kg <MDA <MDA <MDA IA5 Air Iodi ne - Al 9/11/2017 1-131 pCi/m 3 <MDA <MDA **

Air Iod ine - A2 9/11/2017 1- 131 pCi/m3 <MDA <MDA **

Air Iod ine - A3 9/11/2017 1- 13 1 3 <MDA **

pCi/m <MDA Air Iodine - A4 9/11/2017 1-131 pCi/m3 <MDA <MDA **

Air Iodine - A5 3 **

9/11/2017 1-131 pCi/m <MDA <MDA Misc ground 9/11/2017 Gamma pCi/kg <MDA <MDA <MDA coverage - SFB4 Misc ground 9/11 /2017 Gamma pCi/kg <MDA <MDA <MDA coverage - SFB5 Soil - SFS4 9/11 /2017 Gamma pCi/m3 <MDA <MDA <MDA Soil - SFS5 9/11/2017 Gamma pCi/m 3 <MDA <MDA <MDA Air Fi lter - A I 3 <MDA 10/2/2017 Gamma pCi/m <MDA <MDA Air Filter - A2 3 <MDA <MDA 10/2/2017 Gamma pCi/m <MDA 3 <MDA Air Fi lter - A3 10/2/20 17 Gamma pCi/m <MDA <MDA Air Filter - A4 10/2/2017 Gamma pCi/m3 <MDA <MDA <MDA Air Filter - A5 10/2/20 17 Gamma pCi/m3 <MDA <MDA <MDA Air Fi lter - SFAI 3 <MDA 10/2/2017 Gamma pCi/m <MDA <MDA Air Filter - SFA2 3 10/2/2017 Gamma pCi/m <MDA <MDA <MDA Air Filter - SFA3 10/2/20 17 Gamma pCi/m3 <MDA <MDA <MDA Air Filter - SFA4 10/2/20 17 Gamma pCi/m3 <MDA <MDA <MDA 58

January 1 - December 31, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 TABLE C Continued Results of Quality Assurance Program Sample Type and Type of Original Replicate Split Sample Date Result Units Location <2J Analysis Analysis Analysis Analysis Shoreline sediment -

10/3/2017 Gamma pCi/kg <MDA <MDA <MDA WBl Air Iod ine - A 1 10/9/2017 I-131 pCi/m3 <MDA <MDA **

Ai r Iodine - A2 10/9/2017 I-13 1 pCi/m 3 <MDA <MDA **

Air Iodine - A3 I 0/9/2017 I- 13 1 pCi/m 3 <MDA <MDA **

Air Iodine - A4 3 **

10/9/2017 I-13 1 pCi/m <MDA <MDA Air Iod ine - AS 10/9/2017 I-131 pCi/m3 <MDA <MDA **

Air Iodi ne - SFAI 10/9/2017 I-131 pCi/m3 <MDA <MDA **

Air Filter - A I 10/30/20 17 Gross Beta pCi/m 3 1.8 +/- 0.1 1.7 +/- 0. 1 **

Air Filter - A2 3 **

10/30/2017 Gross Beta pCi/m 1.7 +/- 0. 1 1.8 +/- 0. 1 Air Filter - A3 3 **

10/30/2017 Gross Beta pCi/m 1.8 +/- 0.1 1.8 +/- 0.1 Air Filter - A4 10/30/2017 Gross Beta pCi/m3 1.9 +/- 0.1 1.9 +/- 0. l **

Air Filter - AS 10/30/20 17 Gross Beta pCi/m3 1.7 +/- 0. 1 1.8 +/- 0.1 **

Air Fi lter - SFAl 10/30/2017 Gross Beta pCi/m3 1.8 +/- 0.1 1.8 +/- 0. l **

Air Fi lter - SFA2 3 1.6 +/- 0.1 **

10/30/2017 Gross Beta pCi/m 1.7 +/- 0.1 Air Fi lter - SFA3 10/30/2017 Gross Beta pCi/m 3 1.7+/-0.J 1.8 +/- 0.1 **

Air Filter - SFA4 10/30/2017 Gross Beta pCi/m3 1.6 +/- 0.1 1.6 +/- 0.1 **

Bay Water - WAI 10/3 1/2017 Gamma pCi/L <MDA <MDA <MDA Bay Water - WA2 10/3 1/20 17 Gamma pCi/L <MDA <MDA <MDA Air Iodine - A l 11/6/2017 I-131 pCi/m 3

<MDA <MDA **

Air Iodine - A I I-131 3 <MDA **

11/6/2017 pCi/m <MDA Air Iodi ne - A2 11/6/2017 I-131 3 <MDA **

pCi/m <MDA Air Iodine - A2 3 **

11/6/2017 I-131 pCi/m <MDA <MDA Air Iodine - A3 11/6/2017 I-131 pCi/m3 <MDA <MDA **

Air Iodine - A3 11/6/2017 I-131 pCi/m3 <MDA <MDA **

Air Iodine - A4 11/6/2017 I-131 pCi/m 3

<MDA <MDA **

Air Iodine - AS 11/6/2017 I-1 3 1 pCi/m 3

<MDA <MDA **

Air Iodine - SFAI 11/6/2017 I-131 pCi/m3 <MDA <MDA **

Ai r Filter - Al J 1/27/20 17 Gross Beta pCi/m3 2.7 +/- 0. 1 2.6 +/- 0.1 **

Air Fi lter - A2 11/27/2017 Gross Beta pCi/m 3 2.5 +/- 0.1 2.6 +/- 0.1 **

Air Filter - A3 11/27/2017 Gross Beta pCi/m3 2.5 +/- 0. 1 2.6 +/- 0.1 **

Air Filter - A4 11/27/2017 Gross Beta pCi/m 3 2.7 +/- 0.1 2.8 +/- 0.1 **

Air Filter - AS 11/27/2017 Gross Beta pCi/m3 2.8 +/- 0.1 2.7 +/- 0.1 **

59

January 1 - December 31, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 TABLE C Continued Results of Quality Assurance Program Sample Type and Type of Original Replicate Split Sample Date Result Units Location <2> Analysis Analysis Analysis Analysis Air Filter - SFAl 11/27/2017 Gross Beta pCi/m3 2.7 +/- 0. I 2.6 +/- 0. I **

Air Filter - SFA2 11/27/2017 3 2.7 +/- 0.1 **

Gross Beta pCi/m 2.6 +/- 0. 1 Air Filter - SFA3 3 **

11/27/2017 Gross Beta pCi/m 2.6 +/- 0. 1 2.6 +/- 0.1 Air Filter - SFA4 11/27/2017 Gross Beta pCi/m 3 2.5 +/- 0.1 2.6 +/- 0.1 **

Air Filter - Al 12/25/2017 Gross Beta pCi/m 3 2.9 +/- 0.1 3.0 +/- 0.1 **

Air Filter - A2 12/25/2017 Gross Beta pCi/m 3 2.9 +/- 0.2 3.1 +/- 0.2 **

Air Filter - A3 12/25/2017 Gross Beta pCi/m3 2.9 +/- 0.1 3.0 +/- 0.1 **

Air Filter - A4 12/25/2017 Gross Beta pCi/m3 2.9 +/- 0.1 3.0 +/- 0.1 **

Air Fi lter - AS 12/25/2017 Gross Beta pCi/m3 3.0 +/- 0.1 3. 1 +/- 0.1 **

Air Filter - SFAJ 12/25/2017 Gross Beta pCi/m3 2.9 +/- 0.2 3.0 +/- 0.2 **

Air Filter - SFA2 12/25/2017 Gross Beta pCi/m 3 2.7 +/- 0.1 2.8 +/- 0.1 **

Air Filter - SFA3 3 2.8 +/- 0.1 **

12/25/2017 Gross Beta pCi/m 2.8 +/- 0.1 Air Filter - SFA4 12/25/2017 Gross Beta pCi/m 3 2.7 +/- 0.1 2.6 +/- 0.1 **

Gamma field -

6/27/2017 TLD mR/90 days 12.3 +/- 0.7 11.3 +/- 0.4 **

DR05 Gamma field -

6/27/2017 TLD mR/90 days 10.5 +/- 1.2 9.6 +/- 0.8 **

DR06 Gamma field -

6/27/2017 TLD mR/90 days 10.7 +/- 1.0 9.6 +/- 0.8 **

DR07 Gamma field -

6/27/2017 TLD mR/90 days 14.4 +/- 2.0 13.7 +/- 0.4 **

DR08 Gamma field -

6/27/2017 TLD mR/90 days 10.7 +/- 0.8 9.9 +/- 0.8 **

DR09 Gamma field -

6/27/2017 TLD mR/90 days 11.1 +/- 0.8 10.3 +/- I.I **

DRlO Gamma field -

6/27/2017 TLD mR/90 days 11.6 +/- 1.2 I 0.2 +/- 1.3 **

DRII Gamma field -

6/27/2017 TLD mR/90 days 29.0 +/- 7.6 24.7 +/- 3.5 **

SFDR14 Gamma field -

6/27/2017 TLD mR/90 days 26.2 +/- 7.6 23.3 +/- 5.9 **

SFDR15 60

January 1 - December 31, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 TABLE C Continued Results of Quality Assurance Program Sample Type and Type of Original Replicate Split Sample Date Result Units Location <2l Analysis Analysis Analysis Analysis Gamma field -

6/27/2017 TLD mR/90 days 15.7 +/- 0.7 13.5 +/- 1.0 **

DR29 Gamma field -

6/27/2011 TLD mR/90 days 17.3 +/- 0.8 14.7 +/- 1.4 **

DR31 Gamma field -

1/5/2018 TLD mR/90 days 12.0 +/- I. I 12.4 +/- 1.9 **

DR05 Gamma field -

1/5/2018 TLD mR/90 days 10.6 +/- 1.0 10.8 +/- 1.0 **

DR06 Gamma field -

1/5/2018 TLD mR/90 days 10.6 +/- 1.6 12.1 +/- 1.0 **

DR07 Gamma field -

l/5/201 8 TLD mR/90 days 14.7 +/- I. I 16.0 +/- 1.9 **

DR08 Gamma field -

1/5/2018 TLD mR/90 days 10.8 +/- 1.2 11.8 +/- 1.7 **

DR09 Gamma field -

1/5/20 18 TLD mR/90 days 10.5 +/- 1.0 12.0 +/- 1.6 **

DRIO Gamma field -

1/5/2018 TLD mR/90 days 11.5 +/- 1.0 12.5 +/- 1.0 **

DRll Gamma field - 57.37 +/-

1/5/201 8 TLD mR/90 days 48.8 +/- 18.0 **

SFDRl 4 7.1 Gamma field -

1/5/2018 TLD mR/90 days 26.0 +/- 4.3 27.8 +/- 7.1 **

SFDR15 Gamma field -

1/5/2018 TLD mR/90 days 14.6+/- I.I 16.6 +/- 3.0 **

DR29 Gamma field -

1/5/20 18 TLD mR/90 days 16.0 +/- 0.8 17.8 +/- 0.8 **

DR31 1

See discussion at th e beginning of the Appendix.

2 Results reported for Air samples 1-131 and Beta are in I 0-2 pCi/m3. All Vegetation and Soil , Oysters and Fish are in pCi/Kg. All water and milk are in pCi/L, TLD are in mR/90 Day

- The nature of these samples precluded splitting them with an independent laboratory.

61

January l-December31, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 Table C-3 Teledyne Brown Engineering's Typical MDAs for Gamma Spectrometry Selected Bay Water Fish Shellfish Sediment Vegetation Particulates 10-Nuclides pCi/1 pCi/kg pCi/kg pCi/kg pCi/kg 3pCi/m3 H-3 175 Na-22 1 8 3 12 6 5 Cr-51 12 105 4 104 50 63

. Mn-54 9 3 12 5 4 Co-58 l 9 4 9 4 5 Fe-59 3 28 9 24 10 12 Co-60 I 9 4 12 5 6 Zn-65 2 20 8 25 10 9 Nb-95 12 7 14 6 9 Zr-95 2 18 8 20 9 9 Ru-106 9 75 30 90 41 40 Ag-I I Orn 10 IO 10 5 4 Te-129m 16 131 60 162 79 95 1-131 4 65 30 35 22 74 Cs-134 8 4 JO 5 4 Cs-137 1 9 4 JO 5 4 BaLa- 140 3 32 15 25 14 36 Ce-144 7 40 16 54 26 18 62

January 1 - December 31, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 APPENDIXD Land Use Survey Summary of Appendix D Content:

Appendix D contains the results of a Land Use Survey conducted around RE. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant during this operating period. A discussion of the results is included in Section 3.4 of this report.

63

January 1 - December 31, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 TABLE OF CONTENTS - LAND USE SURVEY Table Title Page D-1 Land Use Survey Distances ................ ........... ............ .. ............... ... ... ......... ... ... ... ... ...............65 64

January 1 - December 3 1, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 TABLED-1 Land Use Survey Distances Sector Distance to Distance to Nearest Garden Distance to Milk Producing (Direction in Nearest (Latitude N, Longitude W) Animals Degrees) Residence (Latitude N, Longitude W) 6 10m E

11 70m Onsite Supplemental Garden NIA (94)

(43 .27727 , 77.30140) 430m ESE

( 111) 1660 m Onsite Garden NIA (43.27627, 77 .30389)

ESE 8240 m (119) 840 m NIA (43.24196 , 77.21978) 660 m SSE (145) 610m Onsite Supplemental Garden NIA (43.27278 , 77.30413) s 1500 m NIA NIA SSW 620m NIA NIA SW 740m NIA NIA WSW 1470 m NIA NIA w 2420m NIA NIA 65

January 1 - December 31, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 Discussion A Land Use Survey was conducted to identify, within a distance of five miles, the location of the nearest milk animal, the nearest residence, and the nearest garden greater than 500 square feet in each of the nine sectors over land. A detailed description of the Land Use Survey is given in a separate attachment. The position of the nearest residence and garden and animals producing milk for human consumption in each sector out to five miles is given in the above Table D-1.

Changes from Previous Years:

The nearest residence remains in the SSE sector, approximately 610 meters from the reactor.

Single-family home I housing subdivision construction was observed near the plant on Ridge Road (Union Hill, Ontario), northeast corner of Lake Road and Slocum Road, and Lakeside Road.

New apartment complex construction observed north of Ridge Road in Ontario.

Other single-family home construction was observed sporadically within 5-miles of the plant.

A new 120-acre commercial hydroponic farm began construction on the east-end of Timothy Lane (North of Route 104).

A new 22-acre solar farm is located north of Route 104 (Dean Parkway, Ontario) .

Commercial fishing information was collected from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) which shows activity only in the Eastern basin of Lake Ontario. Commercial fishing operations have not changed in the last five-years.

No new agricultural land use was identified.

No new food producing facilities were identified.

No new milk producing animals were identified. Eaton Farm (supplemental sample) changed names / owner to Field Craft Farms. Their location remains unchanged.

Milk Animal Locations Schultz Farm - 450 Boston Road, Ontario NY Eaton Farm (supplemental sample) changed names / owner to Field Craft Farms. Their location remains unchanged.- (6747 Salmon Creek Road, Williamson NY)

No new milk producing animals were identified in the 2017 survey.

66

January 1 - December 31, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 APPENDIXE Interpretations and Graphical Representations Summary of Appendix E Content:

To better illustrate that the continued operation of the R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant (Ginna) has no statistically significant impact on the surrounding environment, Appendix E contains the results of the last six years of Radiological Environment Monitoring Program (REMP) data.

Where applicable (when analytical results produced a measured numerical value), trends have been produced to show values that have been observed in the various environs surrounding Ginna. A discussion of these results will accompany each series of trends.

67

January 1 - December 31, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 TABLE OF CONTENTS -

INTERPRETATIONS AND GRAPHICAL REPRESENTATIONS Table Title Page E-1 E-Series 1, Table B-1 (Gross Beta Values for Surface and Drinking Water) ... .... ..... ........ 69 E-2 E-Series 2, Table B-5 / Table B-6 (Beta in Air Particulates) ....... .... .... ... .. . ......... ....73 E-3 E-Series 3, Table B-12 (Direct Radiation) ... .......... ... .. .. .. ... .. .......... .... . .... ..... .... 78 E-4 E-Series 4, Table B-13 (Tritium in Groundwater) .... ..... ........... ......... ... .............. 93 68

January 1 - December 31, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 E-Series 1 Table B-1 (Gross Beta Values for Surface and Drinking Water)

Ginna's Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM) is written in accordance with specifications contained within 10 CFR 20 and the Branch Technical Position document published by the NRC in 1979. This document specifies Gross Beta in Surface Water samples to be detected to a Lower Limit of Detection (LLD) of 4 pCi/1. Since that time, detection capabilities have improved which allow values to be measured lower than the required 4 pCi/1.

The trends below include the Gross Beta averages (from 2012-2017) for Ginna's surface water samples (Circ- In, Circ - Out, MCWA, Deer Creek, Mill Creek, OWD, and Webster). An elevated Gross Beta result inconsistent with the trend would indicate radionuclides in the sample which would require further analysis. From 2012 through 2017, no such results have been received from Ginna' s REMP program.

Results from Deer Creek (indicator) and Mill Creek (control) are higher than other surface water samples within the REMP program due to naturally occurring daughter products within the soil being introduced into the samples. It is worth noting that these naturally occurring daughter products would exist in this environ at these same levels even if Ginna had never been built.

Trend "B-1 Control and Indicator Averages (2012-2017) shows the relationship between the control samples (Mill Creek, Circ- In, MCW A) and the indicator samples (Deer Creek, Circ-Out, OWD). This trend illustrates that there is no statistically significant difference between control and indicator samples for Gross Beta in Surface water from 2012-2017. Webster was not included in this trend analysis as it is a supplemental sample to the REMP.

B-1 Control and Indicator Averages {2012-2017)

Controls

Indicators 5.00 4.50

_ 4.00

S 3.50 u * *==~

I

..9: 3.00 ra w 2.50 CCI

"' 2.00 0

~ 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Year 69

January 1 - December 31 , 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 Circ - In Gross Beta (2012-2017) 7.00 6.00

~ 5.00 u

~ 400 (11 C1J

~ 3.00

"'0 1!i 2.00 1.00 0.00 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Year Circ - Out Gross Beta (2012-2017) 7.00 6.00

~ 5.00 iJ

~ 400 (11 C1J

~ 3.00 0

1!i 2.00 * * *

1.00 0.00 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Year MCWA Gross Beta {2012 - 2017) 7.00 6.00 S. 5.00 u

a.

";; 4.00 * *

C1J co 3.00 e *

I!)

2.00 1.00 0.00 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Year 70

January 1 - December 31 , 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 Deer Creek Gross Beta (2012-2017) 7.00 6.00 E;:: 5.00 *

ua. * *

';;;' 4.00

....C1J * *

~ 3.00 0

~ 2.00 1.00 0.00 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Year M ill Cree k Gross Beta (2012-2017) 7.00 6.00 E;:: 5.00 *

ua. *

';;;' 4.00

....C1J * *

~ 3.00

"'0 *

~ 2.00 1.00 0.00 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Year OWD Gross Beta (2012-2017) 7.00 6.00 E;:: 5.00 ua.

';;;' 4.00

....C1J

~ 3.00

"'0

~ 2.00 1.00 0.00 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Year 71

January 1 - December 31, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 Webster Gross Beta (2012-2017) 7 6

~ 5 ua.

...."'CII 4

m 3

"'"'0 l'.5 2 1

0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Year 72

January 1 - December 31, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 E-Series 2 Table B-5 / Table B-6 (Beta in Air Particulates)

Ginna's Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM) is written in accordance with specifications contained within 10 CFR 20 and the Branch Technical Position document published by the NRC in 1979. This document specifies Gross Beta in Air Particulate samples to be detected to a Lower Limit of Detection (LLD) of 1.0 X 10*2 pCi/m 3 . Accordingly, analysis performed as part of the REMP at Ginna satisfy this requirement.

The trends below include the Gross Beta averages (from 2012-2017) for Ginna's air particulate samples (Station-02 through Station-13). An elevated Gross Beta result inconsistent with the trend would indicate radionuclides in the sample which would require further analysis. From 2012 through 2017, no such results have been received from Ginna's REMP program.

Trend "B-5 / B-6 Control and Indicator Averages (2012 - 2017) shows the relationship between the control samples (Station-08, Station-10, and Station-12) and the indicator samples (Station-02, Station-03, Station-04, Station-OS, Station-06, Station-07, Station-09, and Station-11). This trend illustrates that there is no statistically significant difference between control and indicator samples for Gross Beta in Air Particulates from 2012-2017 .

B-5 / B-6 Control and Indicator Averages (2012-2017)

Controls

Indicators 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 m

E 0a. 3.o N

~ 2.5 I C

2.0 QJ ell 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 2012 2013 2014 20 15 2016 2017 Year 73

January 1 - December 31 , 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 I 5.0 Station-02 Beta (2012 -2017) 4.5 4.0 1_ 3. 5

~ 3.0 Tu 2.5 e * * *

.!: 2.0

'11

~ 1.5 co 1.0 0.5 0.0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Yea r Station-03 Beta (2012-2017) 5.0 4.5 4.0 t

3.5

~ 3.0 N

b 2.5

.-4

.!: 2.0 * * * * * *

'11 CII 1.5 co 1.0 0.5 0.0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Yea r Stat ion-04 Beta (2012-2017) 5.0 4.5 4.0 1_ 3.5

~ 3.0 Tu

.!: 2.0 2.5 *

'11

~ 1.5 co 1.0 0.5 0.0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Year 74

January 1 - December 31 , 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 Stati on -OS Beta (2012-2017) 5.0 4.5 4.0 i 3.5

~ 3.0 s 2.5 .

.!: 2.0 n,

t 1.5 en 1.0 0.5 0.0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Year Station- 0 6 Beta (2012-2017) 5.0 4.5 4.0 i 3.5

~ 3.0 b.... 2.5 *

.!: 2.0 n,

t en 1.5 1.0 05 0.0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Year Station -07 Beta (2012-2017) 5.0 4.5 4.0 i 3.5

~ 3.0 s 2.5 *

.!: 2.0 n,

t 1.5 en 1.0 0.5 0.0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Year 75

January 1 - December 31, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 Station-OB Beta (2012-2017) 5.0 4.5 4.0 t 3.5

~ 3.0

~ 2.5 * *

.!: 2.0 Ill Q) 1.5 al 1.0 0.5 0.0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Year Station-09 Beta (2012-2017) 5.0 4.5 4.0 t 3.5 i 3.0

~ 2.5 e

.!: 2.0 Ill Q) 1.5 al 1.0 0.5 0.0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Year Station-10 Beta (2012-2017) 5.0 4.5 4.0 l 3.5

~ 3.0

...b N

2.5

.!: 2.0 * * * * * *

....CII Ill 1.5 al 1.0 0.5 0.0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Year .

76

January 1 - December 31 , 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 Station - 11 Beta {2012-2017) 5.0 4.5 4.0 t 3.5

~ 3.0 b 2.5 *

.: 2.0 IQ

~ 1.5 c:o 1.0 0.5 0.0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Vear Station-12 Beta {2012-2017) 5.0 4.5 4.0 t 3.5

~ 3.0 S: 2.5 *

.: 2.0 IQ

~ 1.5 c:o 1.0 0.5 0.0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Vear Station-13 Beta (2012-2017) 5.0 4.5 4.0 t 3.5

~ 3.0

'b... 2.5 *

.: 2.0 * * *

IQ

~ 1.5 c:o 1.0 0.5 0.0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Vear 77

January 1 - December 31, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 E-Series 3 Table B-12 (Direct Radiation)

Ginna's Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM) is written in accordance with 40 CFR 190.

40 CFR 190 requires that the annual dose equivalent not exceed 25 millirem to the whole body to any member of the public. The average quarterly exposure observed at the control monitoring stations was used to determine the background level (equivalent to 10.7 millirems monthly or 42.8 millirem annually), while the highest total annual dosimeter reading at an individual site boundary environmental monitoring location (55.9 millirem) was observed at Environmental Monitoring Station #64. The difference in these values determines the maximum possible direct radiation dose exposure to an offsite member of the public. Accordingly, the hypothetical maximum direct radiation dose exposure to the public for 2017 was determined to be 13.1 millirem by subtraction of average background from the maximum annual indicator site.

The trends below include the average quarterly exposure (in millirem, mR) for Ginna's direct radiation monitoring locations. This quarterly average is averaged for the year to facilitate trending.

Trend "B-12 Control and Indicator Averages (2012-2017) shows the relationship between the control samples (TL-08, TL-10, TL-12, TL-25 -TL-30) and the indicator samples (TL-02-TL 07, TL-11 , TL-13 -TL-24, TL-31 -TL-40, TL-63 , and TL-64). This trend illustrates that there is no statistically significant difference between control and indicator samples for direct radiation exposure in millirem from 2012-2017.

B- 12 Control and Indicato r Aver~ges (2012-2017)

Controls

Indicators 20.0 18.0 16.0 14.0

"'~ 12.0 * ==== *-~===- . ** *

0

a; o::

E 10.0 8.0 6.0 4 .0 2.0 0.0 2012 2013 2014 201 5 2016 2017 Year 78

January 1 - December 31 , 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 Average TLD mR / 90 Days for TL- 0 2 (2012-2017) 20.0 C

.,, 15.0

~

g 10.0 a:

E 5.0 0.0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Year Average TLD mR / 90 Days for TL-03 (2012-2017) 20.0 C

"' 15.0

~

g 10.0 a:

E 5.0 0.0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Year Average TLD mR / 90 Days for TL-04 (2012-2017) 20.0

"' 15.0 C

11) g 10.0 e * * * *

a:

E 5.0 0.0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Year 79

January 1 - December 31, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 Average TLD mR / 90 Days for TL-OS (2012 - 2017) 20.0 0

.,, 15.0

~

~ 10.0 a:

E 5.0 0.0 2012 2013 2014 2015 20 16 2017 Year Average TLD mR / 90 Days for TL-06 (2012-2017) 20.0 15.0 IV 0

~ 10.0

a:

E 50 0.0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Year Average TLD mR / 90 Days fo r TL-07

{2012-2017) 20.0 0

~

IV 15.0

~ 10.0 a:

E 5.0 0.0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Year 80

January 1 - December 31 , 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 Average TLD mR / 90 Days for TL-08 (2012-2017}

20.0 Ill 15.0 (U

0

~ 10.0 a:

E 5.0 0.0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Year Average TLD mR / 90 Days for TL-09 (2012-2017 )

20.0 Ill 15.0 (U

9 g 10.0 a:

E 5.0 0.0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Year Average TLD mR / 90 Day s for TL-10 (2012-2017}

20.0 Ill 15.0 (U

0

~ 10.0

a:

E 5.0 0.0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Year 81

January 1 - December 31, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 Average TLD mR / 90 Days for TL-11 (2012-2017) 20.0 15.0 n,

0 g 10.0 * * * * *

0::

E 5.0 0.0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017.

Year Average TLD mR / 90 Days for TL-12 (2012-2017) 20.0 15.0

"'>n, 0

g 10.0 * * * * *

0::

E 5.0 0.0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Year Average TLD mR / 90 Days for TL-13 (2012-2017) 20.0 15.0 * * * *

"'n,>

0 g 10.0 0::

E 5.0 0.0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Year 82

January 1-December 31, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 Average TLD mR / 90 Days for TL-14 (2012 - 20 17 )

20.0

.,, 15.0 C e * * * * *

~ 10.0 a::

E 5.0 0.0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Year Average TLD mR / 90 Days for TL- 15 (2012-2017) 20.0

.,, 15.0 C

~ 10.0 a::

E 5.0 0.0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Year Average TLD mR / 90 Days for TL-16 (2012 - 201 7 )

20.0 15.0 C

~ 10.0 a::

E 5.0 0.0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Year 83

January 1 - December 31, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 Average TLD mR / 90 Days for TL-17 (2012-2017) 20.0

~

Ill g 10.0 15.0 a:

E 5.0 0.0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Year Average TLD mR / 90 Days for TL-18 (2012-2017) 20.0 Ill 15.0 C"'

g 10.0 a:

E 5.0 0.0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Year Average TLD mR / 90 Days for TL-19 (2012-2017) 20.0 111 15.0 C"'

g 10.0 a:

E 5.0 0.0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Year 84

January 1 - December 31, 2017 -

Docket Nos. 50-244 Average TLD mR / 9 0 Da ys for TL-20 (2012-2017) 20.0

~

g 10.0 15.0 er::

E 5.0 0.0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Year Average TLD mR / 90 Days for TL-21 (2012-2017) 20.0

~

.,, 15.0 g 10.0 er::

E 5.0 0.0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Year Average TLD mR / 90 Days fo r T L- 22 (20 12-2017) 20.0 15.0

"'>Ill C

g 10.0 * * * * *

er::

E 5.0 0.0 201 2 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Year 85

January 1 - December 31 , 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 Average TLD mR / 90 Days for TL- 23 (2012-2017) 20.0

.,, 15.0 0

<U g 10.0 a:

E 5.0 0.0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Year Average TLD mR / 90 Days for TL-24 (2012-2017) 20.0 Ill 15.0 0

<U g 10.0 a:

E 5.0 0.0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Year Average TLD mR / 90 Days for TL-25 (2012-2017) 20.0

.,, 15.0

n:,

0 6

a, 10.0 a::

E 5.0 0.0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Yea r Average TLD mR / 90 Days for TL-37 (2012-2017) 20.0

.,, 15.0 n:,

0 g 10.0 a::

E 5.0 0.0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Year 90

January 1 - December 31 , 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 Average TLD mR / 90 Days for TL-38

{2012-2017) 20.0

~

111 g 10.0 15.0 a::

E 5.0 0.0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Year Average TLD mR / 90 Days for TL-39

{2012-2017) 20.0 Ill 15.0 Cm g 10.0 a::

E 5.0 0.0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Year Average TLD mR / 90 Days for TL-40

{2012 -2017) 20.0 Ill 15.0 m

C g 10.0 * * * * *

a::

E 5.0 0.0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Yea r 91

January 1 - December 31, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 Average TLD mR / 90 Days for TL- 63 (2012 - 2017) 20.0 15.0 C

IQ *

~ 10.0 cc E

5.0 0.0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Year Average TLD m R / 90 Days for TL-64 (2012 - 2017 )

20.0 15.0 IQ * * * * *

C

~ 10.0 0::

E 5.0 0.0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Year 92

January 1 - December 31, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 E-Series 4 Table B-13 (Tritium in Groundwater)

Ginna's Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM) is written in accordance with specifications contained within 10 CFR 20 and the Branch Technical Position document published by the NRC in 1979. This document specifies Tritium and Gamma in Groundwater samples to be detected to a Lower Limit of Detection (LLD) of 2,000 pCi/1. Since that time, detection capabilities have improved which allow values to be measured lower than the required 2,000 pCi/1 and Ginna measures tritium concentration down to a LLD of 500 pCi/1.

The trends below include the tritium averages (from 2012-2017) for Ginna's groundwater samples (GWOl, GW03 - GW08, GW GW16). A tritium value of greater than 20,000 pCi/1 would indicate radionuclides in the sample which would require further analysis and offsite reporting. From 2012 through 2017, no such results have been received from Ginna' s REMP program.

All results shown below are less-than values (<LLD) excluding the sample result for groundwater monitoring well GW04 from 1/30/2013, which the result was 2,520 pCi/1. This higher than normal value was the result of atmospheric recapture of gaseous tritium which accumulated in snow located around the facility. As this snow melted during this sampling period, this recaptured tritium was introduced into the groundwater and captured via our groundwater sampling program. It is worth noting that this value of 2,520 pCi/1 is roughly 8-times lower than the reportable limit of 20,000 pCi/1.

Additionally, groundwater monitoring well GW14 on 3/11/2014 was counted to an LLD of 2,000 pCi/1 rather than the LLD of 500 pCi/1. Actual result was a less than value of< 1,950 pCi/1.

Subsequent samples were collected to ensure there was no detectable tritium in the environment and these samples returned values of less than 500 pCi/1.

Ginna classifies groundwater monitoring well GWOl as the "control" location for sampling. Due to the sampling frequencies of this program, it is difficult to graphically compare the control samples against the indicator samples. Since 2012, the average tritium concentration in control samples (Groundwater Monitoring Well GWOl) was< 457 pCi/1 whereas the average tritium concentration in indicator samples (Groundwater Monitoring Well GW GW08 , GW10-GW16) was< 459 pCi/1. This result demonstrates that there is no statistically significant difference between control and indicator samples for Ginna's groundwater samples for the REMP.

93

January 1 - December 31, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 Groundwater Well GWOl 2000 1800 1600 1400 iJQ.

1200

e 1000 C

E 300 1-600 400 * * ** * * ***** ***** * * * *

200 0

1/1/2012 5/15/2013 9/27/2014 2/9/2016 6/23/2017 Date Groundwater Well GW03 2000 1800 1600 1400

~ 1200

eC 1000

-e 800

~

600 400

200 0

1/1/2012 5/15/2013 9/27/2014 2/9/2016 6/23/2017 Date 94

January 1 - December 31, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 Groundwater Well GW04 3000 2500 2000

~ See explanation 111 Appendix E uQ.

C 1500 E

.e

~

1000 500 . . . . . . . _..,. . . . _ . e e * * * * * - e * * * * * **

0 1/1/2012 5/15/2013 9/27/2014 2/9/2016 6/23/2017 Date Groundwater Well GWOS 2000 1800 1600 1400 a- 1200 Q.

e 1000 C

I- 800 600 400 200 0

1/1/2012 5/15/2013 9/27/2014 2/9/2016 6/23/2017 Date 95

January 1 - December 31, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 Groundwater Well GW06 2000 1800 1600 1400 uC. 1200

e 1000 C:

e 800 i=

600 400 * * * * * ** * * ***** * * * * * * * * *

200 0

1/1/2012 5/15/2013 9/27/2014 2/9/2016 6/23/2017 Date Groundwater Well GW07 2000 1800 1600 1400 a- 1200 C.

-~ 1000

.ei= 800 600 400 200 0

1/1/2012 5/15/2013 9/27/2014 2/9/2016 6/23/2017 Date 96

January 1 - December 31, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 Grou ndwater Well GW08 2000 1800 1600 1400 S

u 1200 ii

e 1000 C

I

E 800

.=

600

. . . . . . . ~ - . . ., . . . . . . . . . . . _ * * * - * . _* . , , . . . . . . * ... .

400 ** 9' ..... .

200 0

1/1/2012 5/15/ 2013 9/27/2014 2/9/ 2016 6/23/2017 Date Groundwate r Well GW10 2000 1800 1600 1400 S

u 1200 ii C

1000 E

I

800 I-600 400 * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

200 0

1/1/2012 5/15/2013 9/27/2014 2/9/2016 6/23/2017 Date 97

January 1 - December 31 , 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 Groundwater Well GW ll 2000 1800 1600 1400 B°c.. 1200 C:

E 1000

s

-e 800 i=

600 400 ******* * * ** * * ***** ***** * * * *

200 0

1/1/2012 5/15/2013 9/27/2014 2/9/2016 6/23/2017 Date Groundwater Well GW12 2000 1800 1600 1400 B°c.. 1200 C:

E 1000

s

.e i= 800 600 400 200 0

11/22/2013 4/6/2015 8/18/2016 12/31/2017 Date 98

January 1 - December 31, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 Groundwater Well GW13 2000 1800 1600 1400 S

u 1200 a.

C

E 1000

.: 800 600 400 * * * * * * * * * *

200 0

11/22/2013 4/6/2015 8/18/2016 12/31/2017 Date Groundwater Well GW14 3000 2500 ua.

2000

. _ _ _ _ Sec explanation 111 Appendix E C

E 1500 1000 500 e 0

11/22/2013 4/6/2015 8/18/2016 12/31/2017 Date 99

January 1 - December 31, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-244 Groundwater Wel l GWlS 2000 1800 1600 1400 S

u 1200 0.

C:

E 1000

.e 800

~

600 400 * * * * * * * * * * * *

200 0

11/22/2013 4/6/2015 8/18/2016 12/31/2017 Date Groundwater Wel l GW16 2000 1800 1600 1400 a- 1200 0.

C:

E 1000

.::: 800 I-600 400 * *

200 0

11/22/2013 4/6/2015 8/18/2016 12/31/2017 Date 100

CY-Gl-170-300

,,_,,, Exelon Generation* Revision 33 Page 1 of 120 OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL (ODCM)

R.E. GINNA NUCLEAR POWER PLANT TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Operability and Surveillance Requirements .......................... .......................................... 4 2.0 Definitions .......................................................................................................................... 5 3.0 List of Acronyms .............................................. ............................................................... 1O 4.0 RADIOACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENTS ............................................................................... 12 4.1 Concentration (1 O CFR 20) .... ... .. ............ .. ........... ..... ....... ............. .... .. .... .. .. ... .... .. ..... 12 4.2 Dose (1 O CFR 50 Appendix I} ... ..... ......... ... ..... .. .. ............... ... .. .... .. .. .. ....... .......... ..... .. 14 4.3 Total Dose (40 CFR 190) .......... ... .... ..... ............ .. .. ..... ...... .... ......... ... .. .......... ....... ...... 16 4.4 Liquid Effluents Release Points ... .. ................... .... ... .......... ..... ........ ... ....... ... ... .... ... .. . 22 4.5 Liquid Effluents Monitor Setpoints ... .... .... .... ....... ... .... .. ..... ..... ... ..... .... ... .... ...... ....... .... 23 4.6 Liquid Effluent Release Concentrations .. ........... ....... ..... .. .... .... ...... ....... .. ... .. ... ..... ... .. 26 4.7 Liquid Effluent Dose ........... ..... .... ... ..._...... ........ .... ...... .. .. ... ..... ...... ........ ........ .... ... .... ... 27 5.0 RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENTS ......................................................................... 31 5.1 DELETED ...... .... ....... ... ..... .. .. ... .. .. ... .... .. ... ... ... ...... .. ..... ... ....... .. ... .... ...... .... .. .. ...... ...... . 31 5.2 Dose Rate .. .. ..... .. .. .......... ................ .. ....... ...... .... ... ..... .... ..... ... ..... ..... ... ........ ...... -.. .... .. 32 5.3 Dose (1 O CFR 50, Appendix I) .. .. .. .. .. .. ... .... ... .... ... .. .... .. ..... .. ....... ... .. .. .... ... ...... .. .. ....... 34 5.4 Total Dose (40 CFR 190) ... ... ... ......... .. ... ... ...... .. ... ............... ........ ..... ... .... ... ... ... .... ..... 38 5.5 Gaseous Effluent Release Points .... .... ..... ....... .. ...... ............ ............. ....... ..... .. ... .. .... .. 43 5.6 Gaseous Effluent Monitor Setpoints ..... ....... .. .. ....... ..... ........ .. .......... .. ................ ........ 44 5.7 Gaseous Effluent Dose Rate ..... ... .................. .. ............. .......... .. .. ........ ... .. .. ...... .. ....... 50 5.8 Gaseous Effluent Doses ...... ... .... .... .... ... ... .. ... .... ..... ..... .. ...... ............ ............ ............. 52 6.0 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION ............... .................... 58 6.1 Liquid Effluent Monitors ... ... ....................... .... ....... ...... .............. ......................... ....... 58 6.2 Gaseous Effluent Monitors .. ..... .................... ... ........... .. ... .. ........... ..... ........................ 64 6.3 Radiation Accident Mon itoring Instrumentation ....... .. ... .. .... ..... .... ..... .. ....................... 71 6.4 Area Radiation Monitors .. .......... .. .. .. ................................... ........... ..... .. ............. ....... 75 7.0 RADWASTE TREATMENT ......... ...................................................................................... 77 7.1 Liquid Radwaste Treatment System ............. ........................ .... ..... ... .... ....... .. .. .... ... .. 77 7.2 Gaseous Radwaste Treatment System ... .. ... ...... ... ... .. .......... ..... ............... ... ... ....... .. .. 80 7.3 Solid Radwaste System ... ..... ............ ............. ................... ..... ........ ............ .. ........ .... . 83 7.4 Configuration Changes ....... ...... ............ ....... .......... .... ..... ....... .... ............ ..... .. ..... .. ..... 84 7.5 Process Control Program ............ ..... ... .. .. .... .. .... .. ....... .. .. ..... .. .. ... .. .. .. ....... ..... ....... ...... 85

1 CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 2 of 120 8.0 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING ....................................................... 86 8.1 Monitoring Program .... ..... .... ........ ...... ..... .... .. ....... .... .. .......... ... .. .... ..... .... .... ...... .. .. .... . 86 8.2 Environmental Monitor Sample Locations ... .... ........... .... .... ................. .... ..... ..... ....... . 92 8.3 Land Use Census ............................... ... .... .... .... .... .... ...... ... .... .. ..... .... ...... .. ....... .... .. 11 O 8.4 Interlaboratory Comparison Program .... .... ..... .. ... .. .. ... .. .. .. ... ..... ... .. .. ............. ..... ...... 112 9.0 REPORTING REQUIREMENTS ...................................................................................... 113 9.1 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report.. ..... .... .. .. ... ..... ....... .. .. ........ ... 113 9.2 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report .. .............. .......................................... 115 9.3 Special Reports ......... ............................... ... .. ..... ... ... .. ..... ... .. .. .... ... .. .. ...... .... ..... ... ... 117

10.0 REFERENCES

............................................................................................................... 119

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 3 of 120 FIGURES Figure 7-1 Liquid Radwaste Treatment Systems Effluent Paths and Controls ... ..... .... ... ....... 79 Figure 7-2 Gaseous Radwaste Treatment Systems effluent Paths and Controls ....... .. ....... . 82 Figure 8-1 Location of Onsite Air Monitors and Dosimeters .. .. .. ... .... ......... ..... ...................... 96 Figure 8-2 Location of Farms for Milk Samples and Ontario Water District Intake ... ..... ........ 97 Figure 8-3 Location of Offsite Dosimete rs ... .......... .. .... ............ ... .... .... ... ..... .. .... .. .. ........ ... .... 98 Figure 8-4 Location of Off site Air Monitors ... ...... ....... ... ... ... ..... ...... .... .. ....... .... ...... .. ...... ....... 99 TABLES Table 4-1 Radioactive Liqu id Waste Sampling and Analysis Program .. ....... ....... .... .. ... ... .... 18 Table 5-1 Radioactive Gaseous Waste Sampling and Analysis Program .. ................. ........ 40 Table 5-2 Meteorological Data and Locations of Receptors for Set point Calculations ........ 48 Table 5-3 Dose Factors to the Child for Noble Gases and Daughters .... ... .. .. ..... .... .. ...... .. ... 55 Table 5-4 Dose Parameters for Radionucl ides and Radioactive Particulate, Gaseous Effluents ............. .... .... ... .... ...... ... .... ..... ....... ................ .... .. .... ..... .. ........ ... ... ........ 56 Table 5-5 Pathway Dose Factors Due to Radionuclides Other Than Noble Gases .... ... ... ... 57 Table 6.1-1 Radioactive Liquid Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation ... .. ... ... .... .. ..... .... ............ 60 Table 6.1-2 Radioactive Liqu id Effluent Monitoring SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS ....... 62 Table 6.2-1 Radioactive Gaseous Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation .... ..... ........ ............. .... 66 Table 6.2-2 Radioactive Gaseous Effluent Monitoring SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS .. 69 Table 6.3-1 Radiation Accident Monitoring Instrumentation ..... ...... .. ... .... ...... ....... .. .. .... .... .... .. 72 Table 6.3-2 Radiation Accident Monitoring SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS ... .. ..... .. ....... 74 Table 6-4 Area Radiation Monitor SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS .... ...... .............. .. .... 76 Table 8-1 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program .... .... .... .. .. .......... .. ......... ... ..... .. . 88 Table 8-2 Location , Direction , and Distances to Sample Points ...... ..... .... .. .. ... .. ........... ...... . 93 Table 8-3 Detection Capabilities for Environmental Sample Analysis Lower Limit of Detection (LLD). ... ..... ...... ..... ...... .. ..... ..... ...... .. ... ........ .......... ... ... .. .. ... .. .. .... ..... .. 100 Table 8-4 Reporting Levels for Radioactivity Concentrations in Environmental Samples .. 102 Table 8-5 D/Q and X/Q 5 year Average 2011-2015 Plant Vent.. .... .. ... ..... ................ .... .... . 104 Table 8-6 D/Q and X/Q 5 year Average 2011-2015 Containment Vent .... ......... ... .. ........... 106 Table 8-7 D/Q and X/Q 5 year Average 2011 -2015 Air Ejector Vent.. ... .......... .. ... .. ... ....... . 108 Table 9-1 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Summary .................. ... ... ... ... 118

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 4 of 120 1.0 OPERABILITY and SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS The OPERABILITY requirements in this manual follow the same LCO applicabilities as the Improved Technical Specifications with the exception of:

a. LCO 3.0.3 which relates to the failure to meet a Required Action and the associated plant shutdown actions;

b. LCO 3.0.4 which relates to changing MODES with inoperable equipment; and

c. LCO 3.0.6 which deals solely with ITS LCOs on support/supported system inoperabilities.

The failure to meet any Required Action for which no additional ACTIONS are provided shall result in continued efforts to meet the specified Required Action . A plant shutdown to exit the MODE of Applicability is not required unless directed by plant management.

This does not endorse the practice of failing to meet specified Required Actions.

The SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS in this manual follow the same SR applicabilities as the Improved Technical Specifications with the exception of:

a. SR 3.0.4 which relates to changing MODES with incomplete surveillances.

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 5 of 120 2.0 DEFINITIONS The defined terms of this section appear in capitalized type and are applicable throughout these controls. Terms used in these controls and not defined herein have the same definition as listed in the Technical Specifications and/or the Technical Requirements Manual. If a conflict in definition exists , the definition in the Technical Specifications takes precedence .

2.1 ACTION ACTION shall be that part of a Control that prescribes required actions to be taken under designated conditions, within specified completion times.

2.2 CHANNEL CALIBRATION A CHANNEL CALIBRATION shall be the adjustment, as necessary, of the channel such that it responds within the required range and accuracy to known values of input. The CHANNEL CALIBRATION shall encompass the entire channel including the sensors and alarm , interlock display, and/or trip functions and may be performed by any series of sequential, overlapping, or total channel steps such that the entire channel is calibrated .

2.3 CHANNEL CHECK A CHANNEL CHECK shall be the qualitative assessment of channel behavior during operation by observation . This determination shall include, where possible, comparison of the channel indication and/or status with other indications and/or status derived from independent instrument channels measuring the same parameter.

2.4 DOSE EQUIVALENT 1-131 DOSE EQUIVALENT 1-131 shall be that concentration of 1-131 (microCurie/gram) which alone would produce the same thyroid dose as the quantity and isotopic mixture of 1-131, 1-132, 1-133, 1-134, and 1-135 actually present. The thyroid dose conversion factors used for this calculation shall be those listed in ICRP 30, Supplement to Part 1, Pages 192-212, table entitled , "Committed Dose Equivalent in Target Organs or Tissues per Intake of Unit Activity" (Reference 10).

2.5 FREQUENCY NOTATION The FREQUENCY NOTATION specified for the performance of Surveillance Requirements shall correspond to the intervals defined as follows:

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 6 of 120 NOTATION FREQUENCY s At least once per 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months D At least once per 24 hou rs w At least once per 7 days M At least once per 31 days Q At least once per 92 days SA At least once per 184 days R At least once per 18 months S/U Prior to each reactor startup N/A Not applicable p Completed prior to each release 6Y At least once per 6 years

' 3/17 2.6 FUNCTIONAL TEST A FUNCTIONAL TEST shall be the injection of a simulated signal into the channel as close to the sensor as practicable to verify OPERABILITY of alarm ,

interlock display and/or trip functions. The FUNCTIONAL TEST shall include adjustments, as necessary, of the alarm , interlock display and/or Trip Setpoints such that the setpoints are within the required range and accuracy.

2.7 LOWER LIMIT OF DETECTION The LOWER LIMIT OF DETECTION (LLD) is the smallest concentration of radioactive material in a sample that will yield a net count above system background that will be detected with 95% probability with only 5% probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation represents a "real" signal. The LLD is defined as a priori (before the fact) limit representing the capability of a measurement system and not as a posteriori (after the fact) limit for a particular measurement, the minimum detectable activity (MDA) .

2.8 MEMBER(S) OF THE PUBLIC MEMBER(S) OF THE PUBLIC shall include all persons who are not occupationally associated with the plant. This category does not include employees of the licensee, its contractors, or vendors. Also excluded from this category are persons who enter the site to service equipment or to make deliveries. This category does include persons who use portions of the site for recreational , occupational , or other purposes not associated with the plant.

2.9 OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL The OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL (ODCM) shall contain the methodology and parameters used in the calculation of offsite doses resulting

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 7 of 120 from radioactive gaseous and liquid effluents, in the calculation of gaseous and liquid effluent monitoring AlarmfTrip Setpoints, and in the conduct of the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP). The ODCM shall also contain descriptions of the Radioactive Effluent Controls and Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program and descriptions of the information that shall be included in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report and the Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report, as required by Techn ical Specification 5.5.1.

2.10 OPERABLE - OPERABILITY A system , subsystem , train, component, or device shall be OPERABLE or have OPERABILITY when it is capable of performing its specified function(s) and when all necessary attendant instrumentation, controls, electric power, cooling or seal water, lubrication or other auxiliary equipment that are required for the system , subsystem , train, component , or device to perform its function(s) are .

also capable of performing their related support function(s).

2.11 OPERATIONAL MODE - MODE An OPERATIONAL MODE (i.e. , MODE) shall correspond to any one inclusive combination of core reactivity condition, power level, and average reactor coolant temperature specified in Table 1.1-1 of Technical Specifications.

2.12 PURGE - PURGING PURGE or PURGING shall be any controlled process of discharging air or gas from a confinement to maintain temperature, pressure, humidity, concentration, or other operating condition, in such a manner that replacement air or gas is required to purify the confinement.

2.13 RATED THERMAL POWER (RTP)

RTP shall be a total reactor core heat transfer rate to the reactor coolant of 1775 MWt.

2.14 SITE BOUNDARY The SITE BOUNDARY shall be that line beyond which the land is neither owned, nor leased, nor otherwise controlled by the licensee.

2.15 SOURCE CHECK A SOURCE CHECK shall be the qualitative assessment of channel response when the channel sensor is exposed to a source of increased radioactivity.

CY-G l-170-300 Revision 33 Page 8 of 120 2.16 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENT SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS shall be met during the OPERATIONAL MODES or other conditions specified for individual CONTROLS unless otherwise stated in an individual SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENT. Each SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENT shall be performed within the specified time interval with:

1. A maximum allowable extension not to exceed 25% of the surveillance interval, but

2. The combined time interval for any three consecutive surveillance intervals shall not exceed 3.25 times the specified surveillance interval.

2.17 THERMAL POWER THERMAL POWER shall be the total reactor core heat transfer rate to the reactor coolant.

2.18 UNRESTRICTED AREA An UNRESTRICTED AREA shall be any area at or beyond the SITE BOUNDARY access to which is not controlled by the licensee for purposes of protection of individuals from exposure to radiation and radioactive materials, or any area within the SITE BOUNDARY used for residential quarters or for industrial, commercial , institutional, and/or recreational purposes.

2.19 VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM A VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM shall be any system designed and installed to reduce gaseous radioiodine or radioactive material in particulate form in effluents by passing ventilation or vent exhaust gases through charcoal adsorbers and/or HEPA filters for the purpose of removing iodines or particulates from the gaseous exhaust stream prior to the release to the environment. Such a system is not considered to have any effect on noble gas effluents. Engineered Safety Features Atmospheric Cleanup Systems are not considered to be VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM components.

2.20 VENTING VENTING shall be the controlled process of discharging air or gas from a confinement to maintain temperature , pressure, humidity, concentration, or other operating condition, in such a manner that replacement air or gas is not provided or required during VENTING. Vent, used in system names, does not imply a venting process.

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 9 of 120 2.21 WASTE GAS HOLDUP SYSTEM A WASTE GAS HOLDUP SYSTEM shall be any system designed and installed to reduce radioactive gaseous effluents by collecting Reactor Coolant System offgases and providing for delay or holdup for the purpose of reducing the total radioactivity prior to release to the environment.

i CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 10 of 120 3.0 LIST OF ACRONYMS D Frequency Notation noting a surveillance frequency requirement of at least once per 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months .

D/Q Deposition parameter E East ENE East-Northeast ESE East-Southeast HCWT High Conductivity Waste Tank ICRP International Commission on Radiological Protection LLD Lower Limit of Detection M Frequency Notation noting a surveillance frequency requirement at least once per 31 days.

MDA Minimum Detectable Activity N North N.A. Not Applicable N/A Not Applicable NE Northeast NIST National Institute for Standards and Technology NNE North-Northeast NNW North-Northwest NW Northwest ODCM Offsite Dose Calculation Manual p Frequency Notation noting a surveillance frequency requirement of being performed prior to each release.

PCP Process Control Program Q Frequency Notation noting a surveillance frequency requirement at least once per 92 days.

R Frequency Notation noting a surveillance frequency requirement at least once per 18 months .

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 11 of 120 REMP Radiological Environmental Mon itoring Program RTP Rated Thermal Power SA Frequency Notation noting a surveillance frequency requirement at least once 184 days.

SE Southeast s Frequency Notation noting a surveil lance frequency requirement of at least once per 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months .

s South SSE South-Southeast SSW South-Southwest S/U Frequency Notation noting a surveillance frequency requirement of being performed prior to SW Southwest w Frequency Notation noting a surveillance frequency requirement at least once per 7 days.

w West WNW West-Northwest WSW West-Southwest X/0 Dispersion parameter 6Y At least once per 6 years.

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 12 of 120 4.0 RADIOACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENTS 4.1 CONCENTRATION (10 CFR 20) 4.1 .1 CONTROLS:

1. The release of radioactive liquid effluents shall be such that the concentration in the circulating water discharge does not exceed ten times the concentration values specified in Appendix B, Table 2, Column 2 to 10 CFR Part 20.1001 -

20.2402. For dissolved or entrained noble gases, the total activity due to dissolved or entrained noble gases shall not exceed 2.0E-04 µCi/ml.

4.1.2 APPLICABILITY

At all times.

4.1.3 ACTION

If the concentration of radioactive material in the circulating water discharge exceeds ten times the concentration values of Appendix B, Table 2, Column 2 of 10 CFR 20 , measures shall be initiated to restore the concentration to within these limits immediately.

4.1.4 ACTION

If the concentration when averaged over one hour exceeds ten times the applicable concentrations specified in Appendix B of 10CFR Part 20, Table 2, Column 2, at the point of entry to receiving waters, submit to the commission a special report within 30 days.

4.1.5 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS:

1. Radioactive liquid wastes shall be sampled and analyzed according to the sampling and analysis program of Table 4-1. The results of pre-release analyses shall be used with the calculational methods in Section 4.6 to assure that the concentration at the point of release is limited to the values in Section 4.1.1 (Radioactive Liquid Effluents - Controls).

4.1.6 BASES

This control is provided to ensure that the concentration of radioactive materials released in liquid waste effluents to UNRESTRICTED AREAS will be less than the concentration levels specified in 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table 2, Column 2. This limitation provides additional assurance that the levels of radioactive materials in bodies of water in UNRESTRICTED AREAS will result in exposures within (1) the Section II.A design objectives of Appendix I, 10 CFR 50, to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC, and (2) the limits of Appendix B, 10 CFR 20, to the population. The concentration limit for dissolved or entrained noble gases is based upon the assumption that Xe-135 is the controlling radioisotope and its MPC in air (submersion) was converted to an equivalent concentration in water using the

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 13 of 120 methods described in International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP)

Publication 2.

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 14 of 120 4.2 DOSE (10 CFR 50 APPENDIX I) 4.2 .1 CONTROLS:

1. The dose or dose commitment to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from radioactive materials in liquid effluents released to UNRESTRICTED AREAS shall be limited:

A. during any calendar quarter to :5 1.5 mrem to the total body and to :5 5 mrem to any organ, and B. during any calendar year to :5 3 mrem to the total body and to :5 10 mrem to any organ .

4.2.2 APPLICABILITY

At all times.

4.2.3 ACTION

Whenever the calculated dose resulting from the release of radioactive materials in liquid effluents exceeds any of the above limits, a Special Report shall be submitted to the Commission within thirty days which includes the following information:

1. identification of the cause for exceeding the dose limit;

2. corrective actions taken and/or to be taken to reduce the releases of radioactive material in liquid effluents to assure that subsequent releases will remain within the above limits;

3. The results of the radiological analyses of the nearest public drinking water source, and an evaluation of the radiological impact due to licensee releases on finished drinking water with regard to the requirements of 40 CFR 141, Safe Drinking Water Act.

4.2.4 ACTION

During any month when the calculated dose to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC exceeds 1/48 the annual limit (0.06 mrem to the total body or 0.2 mrem to any organ) , projected cumulative dose contributions from liquid effluents shall be determined for that month and at least once every 31 days for the next 3 months.

4.2.5 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS:

Post-release analyses of samples composited from batch releases shall be performed in accordance with Table 4-1. The results of the post-release analyses shall be used with the calculational methods in Section 1.6 to assu re that the dose commitments from liquids are limited to the values in Section 4.2.1 (Dose -

Controls).

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 15 of 120

4.2.6 BASES

This control is provided to implement the requirements of Sections II.A, Ill.A, and IV.A of Appendix I, 10 CFR 50. This control implements the guides set forth in Section II.A of Appendix I. The ACTION statements provide the required operating flexibility and at the same time implement the guides set forth in Section IV.A of Appendix I to assure that the releases of radioactive material in liquid effluents to UNRESTRICTED AREAS will be kept "as low as reasonably achievable". Also, with Lake Ontario drinking water supplies potentially affected by plant operations, there is reasonable assurance that the operation of the plant will not result in radionuclide concentrations in the finished drinking water that are in excess of the requirements of 40 CFR 141 . The dose calculation methodology and parameters in the ODCM implement the requirements in Section Ill.A of Appendix I that conformance with the guides of Appendix I be shown by calculational models and data, such that the actual exposure of a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC appropriate pathways is unlikely to be substantially underestimated. The equations specified in the ODCM for calculating the doses due to the actual release rates of radioactive materials in liquid effluents are consistent with the methodology provided in Regulatory Guide 1.109, "Calculation of Annual Doses to Man from Routine Releases of Reactor Effluents for the Purpose of Evaluating Compliance with 10 CFR 50, Appendix I",

Revision 1, October 1977, and Regulatory Guide 1.113, "Estimating Aquatic Dispersion of Effluents from Accidental and Routine Reactor Releases for the Purpose of Implementing Appendix I", April 1977.

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 16 of 120 4.3 TOTAL DOSE (40 CFR PART 190)

4.3.1 CONTROLS

The annual (calendar year) dose or dose commitment to any MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC due to releases of radioactivity and to radiation from uranium fuel cycle sources shall be limited to less than or equal to 25 mrems to the whole body or any organ , except the thyroid , which shall be limited to less than or equal to 75 mrems.

4.3.2 APPLICABILITY

At all times.

4.3.3 ACTION

With the calculated doses from the release of radioactive materials in liquid effluents exceeding twice the limits of Section 4.2.1 (Dose - Controls), prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days a Special Report that defines the corrective actions to be taken to reduce subsequent releases to prevent recurrence of exceeding the above limits and include scheduling for achieving confo rmance with the above limits. Calculations which include direct radiation contributions from the unit and from any radwaste storage shall be performed to determine total dose to a member of the public. This Special Report, as defined in 10 CFR 20.405(c) shall include an analysis that estimates the radiation exposure (dose) to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from uranium fuel cycle sources, including all effluent pathways and direct radiation, for the calendar year that includes the releases covered by this report. It shall also describe levels of radiation and concentrations of radioactive material involved, and the cause of the exposure levels or concentrations. If the estimated dose(s) exceeds the above limits, and if the release condition resulting in violation of 40 CFR 190 has not already been corrected , the Special Report shall include a request for a variance in accordance with the provisions of 40 CFR 190. Submittal of the report is considered a timely request ,

and a variance is granted until staff action on the request is complete.

4.3.4 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS :

1. Cumulative dose contributions from liquid and gaseous effluents for the current calendar quarter and the current calendar year shall be determined in accordance with SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENT S.1.2.1 at least once every 31 days, in accordance with the methodology and parameters of Section 1.7 of the ODCM. *

2. Cumulative dose contributions from direct radiation from the unit and from radwaste storage shall be determined from environmental dosimeter data at least quarterly.

4.3.5 BASES

This control is provided to meet the dose limitations of 40 CFR 190 that have been incorporated into 10 CFR 20 by 46FR18525. The specification requires the

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 17 of 120 preparation and submittal of a Special Report whenever the calculated doses due to releases of radioactivity and to radiation from uranium fuel cycle sources exceed 25 mrems to the whole body or any organ, except the thyroid, which shall be limited to less than or equal to 75 mrems. It is highly unlikely that the resultant dose to a MEMBER (?F THE PUBLIC will exceed the dose limits of 40 CFR 190 if the plant remains within twice the dose design objectives of Appendix I, and if direct radiation doses are kept small. The Special Report will describe a course of action that should result in the limitation of the annual dose to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC to within the 40 CFR 190 limits. For the purposes of the Special Report, it may be assumed that the dose contributions from other uranium fuel cycle sources is negligible. If the dose to any MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC is estimated to exceed the requirements of 40 CFR 190, the Special Report with a request for a variance, (provided the release conditions resulting in violation of 40 CFR 190 have not already been corrected), in accordance with the provisions of 40 CFR 190.11 and 10 CFR 20.405c, is considered to be a timely request and fulfills the requirements of 40 CFR 190 until NRC staff action is completed. The variance only relates to the limits of 40 CFR 190, and does not apply in any way to the other requirements for dose limitation of 10 CFR 20, as addressed in Section 4.1.1 (Radioactive Liquid Effluents - Controls) and Section 5.2.1 (Dose Rate - Controls). An individual is not considered a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC during any period in which he/she is engaged in carrying out any operation that is part of the nuclear fuel cycle .

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 18 of 120 Table 4-1 Radioactive Liquid Waste Sampling and Analysis Program Liquid Sampling Minimum Type of Activity Lower Release Frequency Analysis Analysis Limit of Type Frequency Detection (LLD)

(µCi/ml) (a)

Batch Release (b) p p Principal Gamma 5.0E-07 Each Batch Each Batch and 1-131 1.0E-06 p M Dissolved and 1.0E-05 One Batch/M Entrained Gases Batch Waste (Gamma Emitters)

Release p M H-3 1.0E-05 Tanks Each Batch Composite (c) Gross Alpha 1.0E-07 p Q Sr-89 Sr-90 5.0E-08 Each Batch Composite (c) Fe-55 1.0E-06 Continuous Release (e)

Continuous w Principal Gamma 5.0E-07 (e) Composite (c) and 1-131 1.0E-06 Continuous w Dissolved and 1.0E-05 (e) Composite (c) Entrained Gasses (Gamma Emitters)

Retention Tank Continuous M H-3 1.0E-05 (e) Composite (c) Gross Alpha 1.0E-07 Continuous Q Sr-89 Sr-90 5.0E-08 (e) Composite (c) Fe-55 1.0E-06 M orS M orS Principal Gamma 5.0E-07 Grab (f) Grab (f) andl-131 1.0E-06 Service (f) (f) Dissolved and 1.0E-05 Water Entrained Gasses (CV Fan (Gamma Emitters)

,mrl SFP Hx (f) (f) H-3 1.0E-05 lines) 1.0E-07 Gross Alpha (f) (f) Sr-89 Sr-90 Fe-55 5.0E-08 1.0E-06

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 19 of 120 Table 4-1 Table Notation (a) The LLD is the smallest concentration of radioactive material in a sample that will yield a net count above system background that will be detected with 95%

probability with only 5% probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation represents a "real" signal. The LLD is defined as an a priori (before the fact) limit representing the capability of a measurement system and not as an a posteriori (after the fact) limit for a particular measurement, the minimum detectable activity (MDA).

For a particu lar measurement system (which may include radiochemical separation) :

LL D = _ _ _ _(_ 4_.66

_)_(S_0_)_ __

(Y)(E)(v) (2 .22 E + 06)[exp (- Ai) ]

Where:

LLD = the lower limit of detection as defined above as µCi per unit mass or volume Sb = the standard deviation of the background counting rate or of the counting rate of a blank sample as appropriate as counts per disintegration V = the sample size in units of mass or volume E = the counting efficiency Y = the fractional radiochemical yield when applicable 2.22E+06 is the number of disintegrations per minute per µCi

'"A, = the decay constant t = the time elapsed since sample time The value of Sb used in the calculation of the LLD for a particular measurement system shall be based on the actual observed variance of the background counting rate or the counting rate of the blank samples, as appropriate, rather than on an unverified theoretically predicted variance. In calculating the LLD for a radionuclide determined by gamma-ray spectrometry, the background shall include the typical contribution of other radionuclides normally present in the samples. Typical values of E, V, and Y should be used in the calculation.

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 20 of 120 The background count rate is calculated from the background counts that are determined to be within +/- one FWHM energy band about the energy of the gamma ray peak used for the quantitative analysis for this radionuclide.

(b) A batch release is the discharge of liquid wastes of a discrete volume. Prior to sampling for analysis, each batch shall be isolated then thoroughly mixed according to the following:

A & B Monitor Tanks shall be mixed by recirculating for at least 2 hours2.314815e-5 days 5.555556e-4 hours 3.306878e-6 weeks 7.61e-7 months .

The High Conductivity Waste Tank (HCWT) shall be mixed by running the pump and air blower for at least 10 minutes. HCWT isolation does not include periodic pumpdown of the AVT sample sink sump.

Steam Generator batch releases during shutdown cannot be adequately mixed by recirculating. A sample shall be taken during mid-release and analyzed.

The outside Condensate Storage Tank cannot be adequately mixed by recirculating. A sample shall be taken during mid-release and analyzed.

The sludge lance trailer shall be mixed by recirculating for at least 30 minutes.

(c) A composite sample is one in which the quantity of liquid sampled is proportional to the quantity of liquid waste discharged and in which the method of sampling employed results in a specimen which is representative of the liquids released.

Decay corrections are calculated from the midpoint of the sampling period.

(d) The principal gamma emitters for which the LLD specification will apply are exclusively the following radionuclides:

Mn-54, Fe-59, Co-58, Co-60, Zn-65, Cs-134, Cs-137 and Ce-141 (Ce-141 shall be measured to a LLD of 5.0E-06).

This list does not mean that only these nuclides are to be detected and reported.

Other nuclides which are measurable and identifiable, together with the above nuclides, shall also be identified and reported. Nuclides which are below the LLD for the analyses should be reported as less than the LLD and should not be reported as being present at the LLD level. The less than values should not be used in the required dose calculations.

(e) A continuous release is the discharge of liquid wastes of a non-discrete volume; e.g., from a volume or system that has an input flow during the continuous release. Decay corrections will be calculated based on all samples collected during the release.

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 21 of 120 (f) Service water samples shall be taken and analyzed once per 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months if alarm setpoint is reached on continuous monitor. Service water sample frequency for H-3, gross alpha, Sr-89, Sr-90, and Fe-55 will be increased to produce a composite whenever principal gamma emitters are detected. The analysis frequency will be monthly for H-3 and gross alpha, and quarterly for Sr-89, Sr-90, and Fe-55 whenever principal gamma emitters are detected.

I i

I

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 22 of 120 4.4 LIQUID EFFLUENTS RELEASE POINTS There are three normal release points for liquid radioactive effluents from the plant that empty into the discharge canal. These are the Radwaste Treatment Discharge , Retention Tank discharge and the All Volatile Treatment Discharge.

Each of these is a monitored release line that can be isolated before the release reaches the discharge canal. There is also a release point for the service water lines used for cooling the heat exchangers that is a monitored release line but is not isolatable. If there is an alarm on the service water monitor, it is necessary to sample each heat exchanger separately to determine which has a leak and then isolate the affected heat exchanger. The pressure of the service water system flow would normally force water from the clean service water side into the contaminated side of the heat exchanger. Dilution of liquid effluent is provided by the discharge canal. The discharge canal flow is nominally 1.7E+05 gpm for each circulating water pump. During operating periods, two circulating water pumps are in operation. During shutdown periods, one circulating water pump is operated. If neither circulating water pump is operable, dilution is provided by operation of one to three service water pumps which provide nominally 5.3E+03 gpm each.

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 23 of 120 4.5 LIQUID EFFLUENTS MONITOR SETPOINTS Alarm and/or trip setpoints for radiation monitors on each liquid effluent line are required. Precautions, limitations and setpoints applicable to the operation of Ginna Station liquid effluent monitors are provided in plant procedure P-9 RAD/A TION MONITORING SYSTEM. Setpoint values are calculated to assure that alarm and trip actions occur prior to exceeding ten times the effluent concentration of Appendix B, Table 2, Column 2 of 10 CFR 20.1001 - 20.2402 at the release point to the unrestricted area. For added conservatism, liquid effluent release rates are administratively set so that only fractions of the applicable maximum effluent concentrations can be reached in the discharge canal.

The Calculated alarm and trip action setpoints for each radioactive liquid effluent line monitor and flow determination must satisfy the following equation:

Equation (1)

Where:

C = the effluent concentration which implements ten times 10 CFR 20 limit for unrestricted areas, in µCi/ml.

c = the setpoint of the radioactivity monitor measuring the radioactivity concentration in the discharge line prior to dilution and subsequent release, in µCi/ml.

F = the dilution water flow as determined prior to the release point, in volume per unit time.

f = the liquid waste flow as measured at the discharge point, in volume per unit time, in the same units as F.

Liquid effluent batch releases from Ginna Station are discharged through a liquid waste disposal monitor. The liquid waste stream (f) is diluted by (F) in the plant discharge canal before it enters Lake Ontario.

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 24 of 120 The limiting batch release concentration (c) correspond ing to the liquid waste monitor setpoint is calculated from the above expression. Since the value of (f) is very small in comparison to (F) , and tritium cannot be accounted for, the expression becomes:

cs; c;- x 0.4 ( 1-TCF)

Equation (2)

Where:

C = 1O x the allowable concentration of Cs-137 as given in Appendix B, Table 2, Column 2 of 10 CFR 20, 1 x 1o- 5 . This value is normally more restrictive than the calculated mixed isotopic release concentration. A weighted average, excluding Sb-1 25, from 1998 data indicated a release concentration of 1.15 x 1o-5 µCi/ml. (See DA-RP-99-078). This should be reviewed as an annual basis, and the more conservative value between the two be utilized.

F = the dilution flow assuming operation of only 1 circulating water pump (170 ,000 gpm).

c = the limiting batch release concentration corresponding to the liquid monitor setpoint f = the maximum waste effluent discharge rate through the designated pathway.

0.4 = a conservatism based on the possibility of 2 liquid discharges occurring simultaneously, minus 0.2 (Total Instrumental Uncertainty) eg: (limit - 0.2 TIU/2)

TCF = the Tritium Correction Factor, based on the maximum concentration of diluted RCS H-3, divided by H-3 E.C.L. The maximum UFSAR RCS tritium concentration is 3.5 µCi/ml. The monitor setpoint against gamma emitters must be reduced proportional to the ratio of tritium in the waste stream, to which the monitor will not respond.

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 25 of 120 The limiting release concentration (c) is then converted to a set-point count rate by the use of the monitor calibration factor determined per the individual monitor calibration procedure. The expression becomes:

Setpoint (c pm) = c (u Cil ,mO Cal Facto r (uCi!mllcp m)

Equation (3)

Example (Liquid Radwaste Mon itor R- 18):

Assuming, for example, that the maximum pump effluent discharge rate (f) is 90 gpm and the RCS tritium concentration is 3 µCi/ml, then the limiting batch release concentration (c) would be determined as fo llows:

3 C1*; l\ < 1 E - 05 (µ Ci/ml) x 170 , 000 (gpm) 0 4 [l _ 1890 ]

c (µ m,; - 90 ~m x

x lE - 2 c ~ 6.39 E- 3 (u Ci/ml)

The monitor R-18 alarm and trip setpoint (in cpm) is then determined utilizing the monitor calibration factor calculated in plant procedure CPI-MON-R18. Assumi ng a calibration factor of 1.2 E _ 8 (u O" ! ml) cpm and a limiting batch release concentration determined above , the alarm and trip setpoint for monitor R-18 would be:

639 E - 3 (µ0" !ml) = 5 33E + 05 cpm above background 1.2 E- 8µ0"/ ml .

cpm The setpoint values for the containment Fan Cooler monitor (R-16) , Spent Fuel Pit Heat Exchanger Service Water Monitors (R-20A and R-20B) , Steam Generator Blowdown Monitor (R-19), the Retention Tank Monitor (R-21, and the All volatile Treatment Waste Discharge Monitor (R-22) are calculated in a similar manner using equation (2) ,

substituting appropriate values of (f) and the correspond ing calibration factor.

Effluent Monitor Warning alarm setpoints are set at one-half of the trip setpoint.

With all calculations equal this is a warning that 20% of the release limit has been reached at a single release point.

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 26 of 120 4.6 LIQUID EFFLUENT RELEASE CONCENTRATIONS Liquid batch releases are controlled individually and each batch release is authorized based upon sample analysis and the existing dilution flow in the discharge canal. Plant procedures establish the methods for sampling and 3/17 analysis of each batch prior to release. A release rate limit is calculated for each batch based upon analysis, dilution flow and all procedural conditions being met before it is authorized for release . The waste effluent stream entering the discharge canal is continuously monitored and the release will be automatically terminated if the preselected monitor setpoint is exceeded. A release may continue subject to grab sample analysis and monitoring in accordance with Table 6.1-1.

The equation used to calculate activity is:

Gamma Spectroscopy uCi / m Act . = peak area co unt s- bkgd counts g (C Time) (EJJ) (Vol) (Decay )(3.7 E + 04)

Equation (4)

CY-G 1-170-300 Revision 33 Page 27 of 120 4.7 LIQUID EFFLUENT DOSE The dose contribution received by the maximally exposed individual from the ingestion of Lake Ontario fish and drinking water is determined using the following methodology. These calculations will assume a near field dilution factor of 1.0 in evaluating the fish pathway dose, and an average annual dilution factor of 200 between the plant discharge and the Ontario Water District drinking wate r intake located approximately 2220 meters northeast (53 degrees) of the discharge canal. The average annual dilution factor of 200 was derived from the drift and dispersion study documented in reference 10.4.

Dose contributions from shoreline recreation , boating and swimming have been shown to be negligible in the Appendix I dose analysis, reference 10.5, and do not need to be routinely evaluated. Shoreline sediment samples downstream from the plant will be collected at least semi-annually for the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program , as a conservatism. Presence of radioactivity above background will result in calculation of dose contribution from these pathways.

There is no known human consumption of shellfish from Lake Ontario; therefore ,

this pathway is not taken into consideration in dose calculations.

The dose contribution to an individual will be determined to ensure that it complies with the specification of Section 4.2.1 (Dose - Controls) . Offsite receptor doses will be determined for the limiting age group and organ, unless census data show that actual offsite individuals are the lim iting age group.

The following expression is used to calculate ingestion pathway dose contributions for the total release period from all radionuclides identified in liquid effluents released to unrestricted areas:

Equation (5)

Where:

D, = the cumulative dose commitment to the total body or any organ, t, from the liquid effluents for the summation of the total time period in mrem.

Lisfor total num ber of hou rs of relea se.

i Llti = the length of the jth time period over which Cij and Fj are averaged for all liquid releases in hours.

CY-G 1-170-300 Revision 33 Page 28 of 120 Cij = the average concentration of radionuclide i in undiluted liquid effluent during time period tj from any liquid release in µCi/ml.

Ai, = the site-related ingestion dose commitment factor to the total body or any organ, 't, for each identified principal gamma and beta emitter in mrem/hr per µCi/ml. See equation (6).

Fi = the discharge canal dilution factor for Cij during any liquid effluent release , defined as the ratio of the maximum undiluted liquid waste flow during release to unrestricted receiving waters. The dilution factor will depend on the number of circulation pumps operating and ,

during icing conditions, the percentage opening of the recirculating gate. Reference curves are presented in plant procedure CH-RETS-LIQ-RELEASE .

Equation (6)

Where:

Ai, = the site-related ingestion dose commitment factor to the total body or to any organ , 't, for each identified principal gamma and beta emitter in mrem/hr per µCi/ml.

k0 = the units conversion factor, 1.14E+05 = 1.OE+06 pCi/µCi x 1.0E+03 ml/kg + 8760 hr/yr Uw = a receptor person's water consumption by age group from Table E-5 of Regulatory Guide 1.109 Dw = the dilution factor from the near field area of the release point to potable water intake. The site specific dilution factor is 200. This factor is 1.0 for the fish ingestion pathway.

LiF = a receptor person's fish consumption by age group from Table E-5 of Regulatory Guide 1.109 BFi = a bioaccumulation factor for nuclide, i, in fish in pCi/kg per pCi/L, from Table A-1 of Regulatory Guide 1.109

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 29 of 120 DFi't is the dose conversion factor for the ingestion of nuclide, i, for a receptor person in pre-selected organ , t, in mrem/pCi , from Tables E-11, E-12 , E-13 , E-14 of Regulatory Guide 1.109 The monthly dose contribution from releases for which radionuclide concentrations are determined by periodic composite sample analysis may be approximated by assuming an average monthly concentration based on the previous monthly or quarterly composite analysis. However, in the Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report the calculated dose contributions from these radionuclides shall be based on the actual composite analysis.

Example:

Computing the dose to the whole body via the fish and drinking water pathways, assuming an initial Cs-137 discharge concentration of 3.0E-04 µCi/ml:

Given the following discharge factors for example, where:

llti = 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months , the duration of the release Cij = 3.0E-04 µCi/ml Fj = liquid waste flow = 20 gpm = 1.2E-04 (dilution flow)(z) 170,000 gpm z = Near field dilution = 1.0 for Ginna Dw= 200 and, taking the following values from Regulatory Guide 1.109 which concern the critical receptor, which is considered to be the child in this case:

Uw = 510 I/year UF = 6.9 kg/year BFi = 2000 pCi/kg per pCi/1 DFi = 4.62E-05 mrem/pCi Then, the site-related ingestion dose commitment factor, Ai,, is calculated as follows:

CY-G 1-170-300 Revision 33 Page 30 of 120

= 1.14 E+ 05 [510+ (6.9) (2 000)]4 .62 E-05 200 Air= 7 .27 E+ 04 mrem/hrper µCi/ml And, the whole body dose to the child is then:

= (7 .27 E + 04) ( 1 ) ( 3.0 E - 04) ( 1. 2 E - 04)

Dr = 2. 6 E- 03 mrem to the whole body from Cs - 137 The dose contribution from any other isotopes would then need to be calculated and all the isotopic contributions summed.

_ .,.1~

CY-G 1-170-300 Revision 33 Page 31 of 120 5.0 RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENTS 5.1 DELETED

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 32 of 120 5.2 DOSE RATE 5.2.1 CONTROLS The instantaneous dose rate due to radioactive materials released in gaseous effluents from the site to areas at or beyond the SITE BOUNDARY shall be limited to the following values:

1. The dose rate for noble gases shall be ~ 500 mrem/yr to the total body and ~

3000 mrem/yr to the skin, and

2. The dose rate for 1-131, 1-133, tritium, and for all radioactive materials in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days shall be ~ 1500 mrem/yr to any organ.

5.2.2 APPLICABILITY

At all times.

Note: For unplanned release of gaseous wastes, compliance with Section 5.2.1 (Dose Rate - Controls) may be calculated using annual average X/Q.

Compliance with Section 5.2.1 (Dose Rate - Controls) shall be determined by considering the applicable ventilation system flow rates. These flow rates shall be determined at the frequency required by Table 6.2-2.

5.2.3 ACTION

If the calculated dose rate of radioactive materials released in gaseous effluents from the site exceeds the limits of Section 5.2.1 (Dose Rate - Controls), measures shall be initiated to restore releases to within limits. The effluent continuous monitors listed in Table 6.2-1 that have provisions for the automatic termination of gas decay tank, shutdown purge or mini-purge releases, shall be used to limit releases within the values established in Section 5.2 .1 (Dose Rate - Controls) when monitor setpoint values are exceeded.

5.2.4 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS:

1. The dose rate due to noble gases in gaseous effluents shall be determined to be within the above limits in accordance with the methodology and parameters of Section 5.7 of the ODCM.

2. The dose rate due to radioactive materials, other than noble gases, in gaseous effluents shall be determined to be within the above limits in accordance with the methodology and parameters of Section 5. 7 of the ODCM by obtaining representative samples and performing analyses in accordance with the sampling and analysis program specified in Table 5-1.

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 33 of 120

5.2.5 BASES

This control is provided to ensure that the dose at any time at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY from gaseous effluents will be within the annual dose limits of 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table 2, Column 1. These limits provide reasonable assurance that radioactive material discharged in gaseous effluents will not result in the exposure of a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC in an UNRESTRICTED AREA, either within or outside the SITE BOUNDARY, to annual average concentrations exceeding the limits specified in Appendix B, Table 2 of 10 CFR 20. For MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC who may at times be within the SITE BOUNDARY, the occupancy of the MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC will usually be sufficiently low to compensate for any increase in the atmospheric diffusion factor above that for the SITE BOUNDARY. Examples of calculations for such MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC, with the appropriate occupancy factors, shall be given in the ODCM. The specified release rate limits restrict , at all times, the corresponding gamma and beta dose rates above background to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC at or beyond the SITE BOUNDARY to less than or equal to 500 mrems/year to the whole body or to less than or equal to 3000 mrems/year to the skin. These release rate limits also restrict, at all times, the corresponding thyroid dose rate above background to a child via the inhalation pathway to less than or equal to 1500 mrems/year.

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 34 of 120 5.3 DOSE (10 CFR 50 , Appendix I)

5.3.1 CONTROLS

The dose due to noble gases released in gaseous effluents to areas at or beyond the SITE BOUNDARY shall be limited to the following:

1. During any calendar quarter to $5 mrad for gamma radiation and to $10 mrad for beta radiation .

2. During any calendar year to $10 mrad for gamma radiation and to $20 mrad for beta radiation.

5.3.2 APPLICABILITY : At all times

5.3.3 ACTION

Whenever the calculated dose to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC resulting from noble gases exceeds the limits of Section 5.3.1 (Dose - Controls) , a Special Report shall be submitted to the Comm ission with in 30 days wh ich includes the following information:

1. Identification of the cause for exceeding the dose limit.

2. Corrective actions taken and/or to be taken to reduce releases of radioactive material in gaseous effluents to assure that subsequent releases will be with in the above limits.

5.3.4 ACTION :

During any month when the calculated dose to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC exceeds 1148th the annual limits of Section 5.3.1 (Dose - Controls) , (0.2 mrad gamma or 0.4 mrad beta) , projected cumulative dose contributions from gaseous effluents shall be determined for that month and at least once every 31 days for the next 3 months.

5.3.5 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS:

Cumulative dose contributions for the current calendar quarter and current calendar year for noble gases shall be determined in accordance with the methodology and parameters of Section 2.8 of the ODCM at least once every 31 days.

5.3.6 BASES

This control is provided to implement the requirements of Sections 11.B, Ill.A, and IV.A of Appendix I, 10 CFR 50. The control implements the guides set forth in Section I.B of Appendix I. The ACTION statements provide the required operating

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 35 of 120 flexibility and at the same time implement the guides set forth in Section IV.A of Appendix I to assure that the release of radioactive material in gaseous effluents to UNRESTRICTED AREAS will be kept "as low as reasonably achievable". The SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS implement the requirements in Section Ill.A of Appendix I that conformance with the guides of Appendix I be shown by calculational procedures based on models and data such that the actual exposure of a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC through appropriate pathways is unlikely to be substantially underestimated. The dose calculation methodology and parameters established in the ODCM for calculating the doses due to the actual release rates of radioactive noble gases in gaseous effluents are consistent with the methodology provided in Regulatory Guide 1.109, "Calculation of Annual Doses to Man from Routine Releases of Reactor Effluents for the Purpose of Evaluating Compliance with 10 CFR 50, Appendix I", Revision I, October 1977 and Regulatory Guide 1.111, "Methods for Estimating Atmospheric Dispersion of Gaseous Effluents in Routine Releases from Light-Water Cooled Reactors",

Revision I, July 1977. The ODCM equations for determining air doses at the SITE BOUNDARY are based on historical average atmospheric conditions.

5.3.7 CONTROLS

The dose to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from 1-131, 1-133, tritium, and for all radioactive materials in particulate form with half-lives greater than eight days released with gaseous effluents from the site shall be limited to the following:

1. during any calendar quarter to :5 7.5 mrem to any organ.

2. during any calendar year to :5 15 mrem to any organ.

5.3.8 APPLICABILITY

At all times.

5.3.9 ACTION

Whenever the calculated dose to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC resulting from radionuclides other than noble gases exceeds the limits of Section 5.3. 7 (Controls) ,

a Special Report shall be submitted to the Commission within 30 days which includes the following information:

1. Identification of the cause for exceeding the dose limit.

2. Corrective actions taken and/or to be taken to reduce releases of radioactive material in gaseous effluents to assure that subsequent releases will be within the above limits.

5.3.10 ACTION:

During any month when the calculated dose to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC exceeds 1148th the annual limit of Section 5.3.7 (Controls) , (0.3 mrem), projected

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 36 of 120 cumulative dose contributions from gaseous effluents shall be determined for that month and at least once every 31 days for the next 3 months.

5.3.11 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS Cumulative dose contributions for the current calendar quarter and current calendar year for lodine-131, lodine-133, tritium , and radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days shall be determined in accordance with methodology and parameters of Section 5.8 of the ODCM at least once every 31 days.

5.3.12 BASES:

This control is provided to implement the requirements of Sections 11.C, Ill.A, and IV.A of Appendix I, 10 CFR 50. The control implements the guides set forth in Section 11.C of Appendix I. The ACTION statements provide the required operating flexibility and at the same time implement the guides set forth in Section IV.A of Appendix I to assure that the release of radioactive material in gaseous effluents to UNRESTRICTED AREAS will be kept "as low as reasonably achievable". The SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS implement the requirements in Section Ill.A of Appendix I that conformance with the guides of Appendix I be shown by calculational procedures based on models and data such that the actual exposure of a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC through appropriate pathways is unlikely to be substantially underestimated. The dose calculation methodology and parameters established in the ODCM for calculating the doses due to the actual release rates of the subject materials in gaseous effluents are consistent with the methodology provided in Regulatory Guide 1.109, "Calculation of Annual Doses to Man from Routine Releases of Reactor Effluents for the Purpose of Evaluating Compliance with 10 CFR 50, Appendix I" , Revision I, October 1977 and Regulatory Guide 1.111, "Methods for Estimating Atmospheric Dispersion of Gaseous Effluents in Routine Releases from Light-Water Cooled Reactors", Revision I, July 1977. These equations also provide for determining the actual doses based upon the historical average atmospheric conditions. The release rate controls for lodine-131, lodine-133, tritium , and radionucl ides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days are dependent upon the existing radionuclide pathways to man in the areas at or beyond the SITE BOUNDARY.

The pathways examined in development of the calculations were:

1. Individual inhalation of airborne radionuclides

2. Deposition of radionuclides onto green leafy vegetation with subsequent consumption by man

3. Deposition of radionuclides onto grassy areas where milk animals and meat producing animals graze, followed by human consumption of that milk and meat

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 37 of 120

4. Deposition of radionuclides on the ground followed by subsequent human exposure

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 38 of 120 5.4 TOTAL DOSE (40 CFR 190)

5.4.1 CONTROLS

The annual (calendar year) dose or dose commitment to any MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC due to releases of radioactivity and to radiation from uranium fuel cycle sources shall be limited to less than or equal to 25 mrems to the whole body or any organ , except the thyroid , which shall be limited to less than or equal to 75 mrems.

5.4.2 APPLICABILITY

At all times.

5.4.3 ACTION :

With the calculated doses from the release of radioactive materials in gaseous effluents exceeding twice the limits of Sections 5.3.1 and 5.3.7 (Controls), prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days a Special Report that defines the corrective actions to be taken to reduce subsequent releases to prevent recurrence of exceeding the above limits and include scheduling for achieving conformance with the above limits. Calculations wh ich include direct radiation contributions from the unit and from any radwaste storage shall be performed to determine total dose to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC. This Special Report, as defined in 10 CFR 20.405(c) shall include an analysis that estimates the radiation exposure (dose) to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from uranium fuel cycle sources, including all effluent pathways and direct radiation , for the calendar year that includes the releases covered by this report . It shall also describe levels of radiation and concentrations of radioactive material involved, and the cause of the exposure levels or concentrations. If the estimated dose(s) exceeds the above limits, and if the release condition resulting in violation of 40 CFR 190 has not already been corrected, the Special Report shall include a request for a variance in accordance with the provisions of 40 CFR 190.

Submittal of the report is considered a timely request, and a variance is granted until staff action on the request is complete.

5.4.4 ACTION

This report shall include an analysis which demonstrates that radiation exposu re to all MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC from the plant are less than the 40 CFR 190 limits.

Otherwise , the report shall request a variance from the commission to permit releases to exceed 40 CFR Part 190. Submittal of the report is conside red a timely request by the NRC, and a variance is granted until staff action on the request is complete.

5.4.5 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS:

1. Cumulative dose contributions from liquid and gaseous effluents shall be determined in accordance with Sections 5.3 .5 and 5.3.11 (Surveillance Requirements) at least once every 31 days, in accordance with the methodology and parameters of Section 2.8 of the ODCM.

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 39 of 120

2. Cumulative dose contributions from direct radiation from the unit and from radwaste storage including ISFSI, shall be determined from environmental dosimeter data at least quarterly.

5.4.6 BASES

This control is provided to meet the dose limitations of 40 CFR 190 that have been incorporated into 10 CFR 20 by 46FR18525. The specification requires the preparation and submittal of a Special Report whenever the calculated doses due to releases of radioactivity and to radiation from uranium fuel cycle sources exceed 25 mrems to the whole body or any organ, except the thyroid, which shall be limited to less than or equal to 75 mrems. It is highly unlikely that the resultant dose to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC will exceed the dose limits of 40 CFR 190 if the plant remains within twice the dose design objectives of Appendix I, and if direct radiation doses are kept small.

Cumulative direct radiation dose from environmental dosimeters shall be used to ensure that dose limits of 10CFR72.104 are met. The Special Report will describe a course of action that should result in the limitation of the annual dose to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC to within the 40 CFR 190 limits. For the purposes of the Special Report, it may be assumed that the dose contributions from other uranium fuel cycle sources is negligible. If the dose to any MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC is estimated to exceed the requirements of 40 CFR 190, the Special Report with a request for a variance, (provided the release conditions resulting in violation of 40 CFR 190 have not already been corrected), in accordance with the provisions of 40 CR 190.11 and 10CFR 20.405c, is considered to be a timely request and fulfills the requirements of 40 CFR 190 until NRC staff action is completed . The variance only relates to the limits of 40 CFR 190, and does not apply in any way to the other requirements for dose limitation of 10CFR 20, as addressed in Section 4.1.1 (Radioactive Liquid Effluents - Controls) and Section 5.2 ,1 (Dose Rate - Controls). An individual is not considered a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC during any period in which he/she is engaged in carrying out any operation that is part of the nuclear fuel cycle.

CY-G 1-170-300 Revision 33 Page 40 of 120 Table 5-1 Radioactive Gaseous Waste Sampling and Analysis Program Gaseous Sampling Minimum Type of Activity Lower Limit of Release Type Frequency Analysis Analysis Detection (LLD)

Freauencv {uCi/cc) {a)

Containment p p Principal Gamma 1.0E-04 Purge Each Purge (b,c) Emitters (e) 1.0E-06 Grab Sample H-3 Auxiliary M (b) M (b) Principal Gamma 1.0E-04 Building Grab Sample Emitters (e) 1.0E-06 Ventilation H-3 Continuous (d) w (b,i) 1-131 1.0E-12 Charcoal 1-133 1.0E-10 pie Continuous (d) w (b,i) Principal Gamma 1.0E-11 Particulate Emitters (e)

All Release Sample Types Continuous (d) M Gross Alpha 1.0E-11 as listed above Composite Particulate Sample Continuous (d) Q Sr-89 Sr-90 1.0E-1 1 Composite Particulate Sample Air Ejector M (b,f) Grab M (b, f) Principal Gamma 1.0E-04 Sample Emitters (e) 1.0E-12 1-131 (h) 1.0E-06 H-3 (g)

All Release Continuous (d) Noble Gas Beta or Gamma 1.0E-06 Types listed Monitor above Gas Decay Tank p p Principal Gamma 1.0E-04 Each Tank Grab Each Tank Emitters (e)

Sample

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 41 of 120 Table 5-1 Table Notation (a) The lower limit of detection (LLD) is defined in Table Notation (a) of Table 4-1.

(b) Analyses shall also be performed when the monitor on the continuous sampler reaches its setpoint.

(c) Tritium grab samples shall be taken at least three times per week when the reactor cavity is flooded .

(d) The ratio of the sample flow rate to the sampled stream flow rate shall be known for the time period covered by each dose or dose rate calculation made in accordance with Sections 5.2.1 , 5.3.1 , and 5.3.7 (Controls) .

(e) The principal gamma emitters for which the LLD specification will apply are exclusively the following radionucl ides:

Kr-85m, Xe-133 , Xe-133m and Xe-135 for gaseous emissions

1-131 , Mn-54, Fe-59 , Co-58 , Co-60, Zn-65, Mo-99, Cs-134, Cs-137, Ce-141 and Ce-144 for particulate emissions.

This list does not mean that only these nuclides are to be detected and reported .

Other nuclides which are measurable and identifiable, together with the above nuclides, shall also be identified and reported. Nuclides which are below the LLD for the analyses should not be reported as being present at the LLD level for that nuclide. When unusual circumstances result in LLDs higher than required, the

, reasons shall be documented in the Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report.

(f) Air ejector samples are not requi red during cold or refueling shutdowns.

(g) Air ejector tritium sample is not required if the secondary coolant activity is less than 1.0E-04 µCi/gm.

(h) Air ejector iodine samples shall be taken and analyzed weekly if the secondary coolant activity exceeds 1.0E-04 µCi/gm.

(i) Analyses shall be completed within 48 hours5.555556e-4 days 0.0133 hours 7.936508e-5 weeks 1.8264e-5 months after changing , or after removal from sampler. Sampling shall also be performed at least once per 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months for at least 7 days following each shutdown, startup, or THERMAL POWER change exceeding 15% RATED THERMAL POWER within a 1-hour period and analyses shall be completed within 48 hours5.555556e-4 days 0.0133 hours 7.936508e-5 weeks 1.8264e-5 months of changing. When samples collected for 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months are analyzed, the corresponding LLDs may be increased by a factor of 10. This requirement for increased sample frequency does not apply if: (1) analysis shows that the DOSE EQUIVALENT 1-131 concentration in the reactor coolant has not increased more than a factor of 3; and (2) the noble gas monitor shows that effluent

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 42 of 120 activity has not increased more than a factor of 3.

CY-G 1-170-300 Revision 33 Page 43 of 120 5.5 GASEOUS EFFLUENT RELEASE POINTS There are three release points continuously monitored for noble gases, containment vent, plant vent and air ejector. The containment vent and plant vent are also continuously monitored for radioiodines and particulates. Since the air ejector is a steam release point, continuous radioiodine and particulate monitoring is not required when the secondary coolant activity is less than 1.0E-04 µCi/gm. Flow rates through the vents are measured periodically. During shutdown, temporary trailers may be brought on site that also require monitoring and characterization of their releases , such as the CO2 decon trailer.

Quarterly plant measurements of one week duration for the particulate and iodine released in the steam by the air ejector demonstrate that sampling this pathway for particulate and iodine is not necessary since these releases are less than 0.1 % of the Plant Vent. The releases are correlated to blowdown activity for determining activity in steam releases. During shutdown and startup, special systems are in use that may release small amounts of radioactivity in steam releases. This is accounted for by using operational data and activity in the source of the steam .

Grab samples are obtained when practicable.

If an unmonitored release point is identified, a calculation is performed to determine the radioactivity that is released. The calculation includes a conservative estimate of source term if sample data is not available, and a conservative estimate of flow rate and duration if measurement of flow and duration are not available. If the release is continuous, it is included in the monthly report that accounts for releases from the site for calculating doses to the general public.

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 44 of 120 5.6 GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITOR SETPOINTS Alarm and/or trip setpoints for specified radiation monitors are required on each noble gas effluent line from the plant. Precautions, limitations and setpoints applicable to the operation of Ginna Station gaseous effluent monitors are provided in plant procedure P-9. Setpoints are conservatively established for each ventilation noble gas monitor so that dose rates in unrestricted areas corresponding to 10 CFR Part 50 Appendix I limits will not be exceeded. Setpoints shall be determined so that dose rates from releases of noble gases will comply with Section 5.2.1 (Dose Rate - Controls).(1 ). Table 5-2 provides the gaseous and particulate meteorological assumption used in development of the P-9 setpoints.

The gaseous and particulate meteorological assumptions used in Table 5-2 were derived from legacy UFSAR analyses arid are more conservative than the meteorological assumptions used to calculate routine effluent doses to critical receptors in the effluent management software.

The calculated alarm and trip action setpoints for each radioactive gaseous effluent monitor must satisfy the following equation :

I,gl' cl' s; -( f)_,_\k-)-(K-C)

Equation (7)

Where:

cv = setpoint in cpm Oiv = release rate limit by specific nuclide (i) in µCi/sec from vent (v) f= discharge flow rate in cfm k= units conversion factor in cc/sec/cfm K= calibration factor in µCi/cc/cpm]

The general methodology for establishing plant ventilation monitor setpoints is based upon a vent concentration limit in µCi/cc derived from site specific meteorology and vent release characteristics.

Additional radiation monitor alarm and/or trip setpoints are calculated for radiation monitors measuring radioiodines, radioactive materials in particulate form and to radionuclides other than noble gases. Setpoints are determined to assure that dose rates from the release of these effluents shall comply with Section 5.2.1 (Dose Rate - Controls)(2)

CY-G 1-170-300 Revision 33 Page 45 of 120 The release rate limit for noble gases shall be calculated by the following equation for total body dose:

Q* [uOl.ssc]~'°'Q

500 mrsmlyr

!V .4,, !V(X/f!\ "KQ.

2 2::::)v L l 2V Equation (8)

Note: An occupancy factor of 1 is assumed. This may be modified following reviews of the area in question and by the following equation for skin doses:

Qv [u C!.1 .sec ] < .L. zv - - 3000

_ "Q* - -mrsmlyr

-~--

i (XIQ)l. I,(Lz+ 1.1.M;) gl.

i Equation (9)

Where:

Oiv = the release rate of radionuclide (i) from vent (v) which results in a dose rate of 500 mrem/yr to the whole body or 3000 mrem/yr to the skin of the critical receptor in µCi/ sec.

Ki = the total body dose factor due to gamma emissions for each identified noble gas radionuclide in mrem/yr per µCi/m3 from Table 5-3.

Li = the skin dose factor due to beta emissions for each identified noble gas radionuclide in mrem/yr per µCi/m3 from Table 5-3.

Mi = the air dose factor due to gamma emissions for each identified noble gas radionuclide in mrad/yr per µCi/m3 from Table 5-3. Unit conversion constant of 1.1 mrem/mrad converts air dose to skin dose.

(X/O)v = the highest calculated annual average dispersion parameter for estimating the dose to the critical offsite receptor from vent release point (v) in sec/m 3 . The (X/O)v is calculated by the method described in Regulatory Guide 1.111.

Noble gas monitor setpoints are conservatively set according to procedure P-9, RAD/A TION MONITORING SYSTEM, to correspond to fractions of the applicable 10 CFR Part 20 dose limits for unrestricted areas. Fractions are small enough to

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 46 of 120 assure the timely detection of any simultaneous discharges from multiple release points before the combined downwind site boundary concentration could exceed allowable limits. Additional conservatism is provided by basing these setpoints upon instantaneous downwind concentrations. Release rates during the remainder of a given year, combined with any infrequent releases at setpoint levels, would result in only a very small fraction of the 10 CFR Part 20 annual limits.

Historically, xenon-133 has been the principal fission product noble gas released from all vents and is appropriate for use as the reference isotope for establishing monitor setpoints. The whole body dose will be limiting, and the Xe-133 release rate limit is calculated by substituting the appropriate values into equation (8). After the release rate limit for Xe-133 is determined for each vent, the corresponding vent concentration limits are calculated based on applicable vent flow rates. During periods of high make-up water usage, argon-41 from air saturated make-up water becomes the principle radiogas of concern and may be used as the reference isotope for establishing setpoints. Calibration factors in µCi/cc per cpm are used to convert limiting vent concentrations to count rates.

Example: Plant Vent Monitor, R-14 Using Xe-133 as the controlling isotope for the setpoint and assuming a measured activity of 2.66E-04 µCi/cc and a ratemeter reading of 4750 cpm above background, the efficiency can be calculated, using a measured vent flow of 7.45E+04 cfm, Ki from Table 5-3 of 2.94E+02 and a (X/O)v for the site boundary of 2.?E-06 , the Release Rate Limit is calculated and then the setpoint determined.

X,e- 133 eJJicierncy Activity

= t-r-at-em-e-te-r-r-ea-d-in-g

-]\{3-

aV e- 133 e,..vicienc,p

=

2.&5 E - 04 = 5.67 E - 08 11 Ci/ cpmcc 4750 Using Equation 8:

Q* ~ 5oo ~ 63 E+05 110" /s ec n (2 .94 E + 02)(2.7 E - 06)

Release Rate Limit Q;l, ~ 5oo mrem/ yr

' (Ki)~/Q)v

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 47 of 120 Using Equation 7:

Q-Setpoint c:; n*

if; (k)(K) c

_~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

6.3 E + OS u Ci/sec (7.45 E + 04 cjm) (472 cc !s ec) (s .67 E - 08 11 O ! cc) cfm cpm c:; 3.2 E+ OS cpm Per procedure P-9, R-14 is set at 0.4 of this value or 1.28E+05 cpm for normal operation. 40% of the release rate limit is a conservatism based on the possibility of two release points simultaneously at their setpoints fo r a total of 80% of the release rate limit.

Effluent Monitor Warning alarm setpoints are set at one-half of the trip setpoint. With all calculations equal this is a warning that 20% of the release limit has been reached at a single release point.

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 48 of 120 Table 5-2 Meteorological Data and Locations of Receptors for Set Point Calculations Process Monitors Monitor (Radioisotope) Geographic Release Point X/Q 0/Q (m- 2) Flow Location (vent) (sec/m 3 ) (cfm)

(Dist./Direction)

R-10A (Radioiodine) 0.5 - 1 mile ESE Containment 2.4E-8 12,520 R-1 OB (Radioiodine) 0.5 - 1 mile ESE Plant 3.0E-8 81,650 12/17 R-11 (Cs-137) 0.5 - 1 mile ESE Containment 2.4E-8 12,520 R-12 (Xe-133) 0.5 - 1 mile E Containment 1.6E-6 12,520 R-13 (Cs-137) 0.5 - 1 mile ESE Plant 3.0E-8 81 ,650 R-14 (Xe-133) 0.5 - 1 mile E Plant 2.7E-6 81 ,650 R-15 (Xe-133) 0.3 miles SSE Air Ejector 1.3E-5 720 R-4 7 (Ar-41) 0.3 miles SSE Air Ejector 1.3E-5 3 Accident Monitors Monitor (Radioisotope) Geographic Release Point X/Q 0/Q (m- 2) Flow Location (vent) (sectm 3 ) (cfm)

(Dist./Direction)

R-12A 0.5-1 mile ESE Containment 2.4E-8 12,520 (Rad ioiodine)

R-12A 0.5-1 mile ESE Containment 2.4E-8 12,520 (Particu lateCs-137)

R-12A 0.5-1 mile E Containment 1.6E-6 12,520 (Noble Gas Xe-133)

R-14A 0.5-1 mile ESE Plant 3.0E-8 81 ,650 12/17 (Radioiodine)

R-14A 0.5-1 mile ESE Plant 3.0E-8 81 ,650 (Particulate Cs-137)

R-14A 0.5-1 mile E Plant 2.7E-6 81 ,650 (Noble Gas Xe- 133)

R-47 (Ar-41) 0 .3 miles SSE Air Ejector 1.3E-5 3 R-48 0 .3 miles SSE Air Ejector 1.3E-5 720 (RCS Accident Mix)

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 49 of 120 Table 5-2 (continued ... )

Further details found in procedure P-9.

1-131 , 1-133, H-3 and particulates with half lives greater than 8 days utilizes the following equation:

0 . < 1500 mrem /ye ar

-n - (D!Qh Pi For Noble Gases:

Q . < 500 mrem /year n - (/{! Q)-y Ki Pi = Food and ground pathways in m2 mrem/year per µCi/sec Ki = mrem/year per µCi/m3 Oiv = Release rate in units of µCi/sec

CY-G 1-170-300 Revision 33 Page 50 of 120 5.7 GASEOUS EFFLUENT DOSE RATE Gaseous effluent monitor setpoints as described in Section 5.6 of this manual are established at concentrations which permit some margin for corrective action to be taken before exceeding offsite dose rates corresponding to 10 CFR Part 20 limitations. Plant procedures establish the methods for sampling and analysis for continuous ventilation releases and for containment purge releases. Plant 3/17 procedures also establish the methods for sampling and analysis prior to gas decay tank releases. The instantaneous dose rate in unrestricted areas due to unplanned releases of airborne radioactive materials may be calculated using annual average X/Q's. Dose rates shall be determined using the following expressions:

For noble gases:

D.., = r.[ (Li + 1.1 Mi ) (/UQ).., gl,J:; 3000 mrem / yr l

Equation (11)

Total gamma and beta dose to the skin D.., = i: [Ki (X/ Qh, Qil, J:; 500 mrem/yr l

Equation (12) total body dose For 1-131, 1-133, tritium and all radioactive materials in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days:

D.., = L Pi WY Qil' :; 1500 mrem / yr to critical organ i

Equation (13)

Where:

Ki = the total body dose factor due to gamma emissions for each identified noble gas radionuclide (1) in mrem/yr per µCi/m 3 from Table 5-2.

Li = the skin dose factor due to beta emissions for each identified noble gas radionuclide (1) in mrem/yr per µCi/m3 from Table 5-3.

CY-G 1-170-300 Revision 33 Page 51 of 120 Mi = the air dose factor due to gamma emissions for each identified noble gas radionuclide (1) in mrad/yr per µCi/m3 from Table 5-3. Unit conversion constant of 1.1 mrem/mrad converts air dose to skin dose.

Pi = the dose parameter for radionuclide (1) other than noble gases for the inhalation pathway, in mrem/yr per µCi/m3. The dose factors are based on the critical individual organ and the child age group.

Pi is further defined as: Pi =(1 o6pCi/uCi)(BR)(DFAi) where BR is the breathing rate for a child in m3/yr and DFAi is the dose factor for the child in mrem/pCi.

(X/O)v = the highest calculated annual average relative concentration for any area at or beyond the unrestricted area boundary in sec/m 3 .

Wv = the highest annual average dispersion parameter for estimating the dose to the critical receptor in sec/m3 for the inhalation pathway and in m- 2 for the food and ground pathways.

Oiv = the release rate of radionuclide (1) from vent (v) in µCi/sec.

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 52 of 120 5.8 GASEOUS EFFLUENT DOSES The air dose in ur:,restricted areas due to noble gases released in gaseous effluents from the site shall be determined using the following expressions:

During any calendar year, for gamma air dose:

Dyy = 3.17 E-08 4, [Mi (X/ Q)ygy J =:; 10 mrad Equation (14)

During any calendar quarter. for gamma air dose:

Dy r' = 3.17 E -08 4, [Mi (X I Q).,. gy J 5 5 mrad Equation (14A)

During any calendar year for beta air dose:

Dl.~ = 3.17 E-08 4, [~ (XI Q)y QiY J5 20 mrad (Equation 15)

During any calendar quarter. for beta air dose:

Dy~ = 3.17 E-08 4, [~ (XIQ)y QiY J5 10 mrad (Equation 15A)

Where:

Mi = the air dose factor due to gamma emissions for each identified noble gas radionuclide in mrad/yr per µCi/m3 from Table 5-3 Ni = the air dose factor due to beta emissions for each identified noble gas radionuclide in mrad/yr per µCi/m3 from Table 5-3

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 53 of 120 (X/O)v = for vent releases. The highest calculated annual average relative concentration for any area at or beyond the unrestricted area boundary in sec/m 3 .

Dy = the total gamma air dose from gaseous effluents in mrad.

D~ = the total beta air dose from gaseous effluents in mrad.

Oiv = the release of noble gas radionuclides, i, in gaseous effluents from vents in

µCi. Releases shall be cumulative over the time period.

3.17E-08 = the inverse of the number of seconds in a year The dose to an individual from 1-131, 1-133, tritium and all radioactive materials in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days in gaseous effluents released from the site to unrestricted areas shall be determined using the following expression:

dose during any calendar year:

D1 = 317 E-08 I, [Ri ~ Qiv J::; 15 mr em 1

Equation (16) dose during any calendar quarter:

D1 = 317 E-08 L [Ri Wvgv J::; 7.5 mrem i

(Equation 16A)

Where:

D1 = the total dose from 1-131, 1-133, tritium and all radioactive materials in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days in gaseous effluents in mrem.

Ri = the dose factor for each identified radionuclide (i) in m- 2 mrem/yr per µCi/sec or mrem/ yr per µCi/m3 from Table 5-5.

Wv = the annual average dispersion parameter for estimating the dose to an individual at the critical location in sec/m3 for the inhalation pathway and in

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 54 of 120 m-2 for the food and ground pathways.

Oiv = the release of 1-131, 1-133, tritium and all radioactive materials in particulate form in gaseous effluents with half-lives greater than 8 days in µCi.

Releases shall be cumulative over the desired time period as appropriate.

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 55 of 120 Table 5-3 Dose Factors to the Child For Noble Gases and Daughters

Radio- Total Body Dose Skin Dose Factor Gamma Air Dose Beta Air Dose nuclides Factor Ki Li (mrem/yr per Factor Mi Factor Ni (mrem/yr µCi/m3) (mrad/yr (mrad/yr per µCitm )3 per µCi/m3) per µCi/m3)

Kr-83m 7.56E-02** ---- 1.93E+01 2.88E+02 Kr-85m 1.17E+03 1.46E+03 1.23E+03 1.97E+03 Kr-85 1.61 E+01 1.34E+03 1.72E+01 1.95E+03 Kr-87 5.92E+03 9.73E+03 6.17E+03 1.03E+04 Kr-88 1.47E+04 2.37E+03 1.52E+04 2.93E+03 Kr-89 1.66E+04 1.01 E+04 1.73E+04 1.06E+04 Kr-90 1.56E+04 7.29E+03 1.63E+04 7.83E+03 Xe-131 m 9.15E+01 4.76E+02 1.56E+02 1.11 E+03 Xe-133 2.94E+02 3.06E+02 3.53E+02 1.05E+03 Xe-133m 2.51E+02 9.94E+02 3.27E+02 1.48E+03 Xe-135m 3.12E+03 7.11 E+02 3.36E+03 7.39E+02 Xe-135 1.81 E+03 1.86E+03 1.92E+03 2.46E+03 Xe-137 1.42E+03 1.22E+04 1.51 E+03 1.27E+04 Xe-138 8.83E+03 4.13E+03 9.21 E+03 4 .75E+03 Ar-41 8.84E+03 2.69E+03 9.30E+03 3.28E+03

The listed dose factors are for radionuclides that may be detected in gaseous effluents . These dose factors for noble gases and daughter nuclides are taken from Table B-1 of Regulatory Guide 1.109 (Reference 3). A semi-infinite cloud is assumed.

- 7.56E-02 = 7.56 x 10-2

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 56 of 120 Table 5-4 Dose Parameters for Radionuclides and Radioactive Particulate, Gaseous Effluents

Radio- Pi Inhalation Pi Food & Radio- Pi Inhalation Pi Food &

nuclides Pathways Ground nuclides Pathways Ground (mrem/yr per Pathways (m2 x (mrem/yr per Pathways (m2 x

µCi/m 3) mrem/yr per µCi/m 3 ) mrem/yr per

µCi/sec) µCi/sec)

H-3 6.5E+02 2.4E+03 Cd-115m 7.0E+04 4.8E+07 C-14 8.9E+03 1.3E+09 Sn-126 1.2E+06 1.1E+09 Cr-51 3.6E+02 1.1E+07 Sb-125 1.5E+04 1.1E+09 Mn-54 2.5E+04 1.1E+09 Te-127m 3.8E+04 7.4E+10 Fe-59 2.4E+04 7.0E+08 Te-129m 3.2E+04 1.3E+09 Co-58 1.1E+04 5.7E+08 Te-132 1.0E+03 7.2E+07 Co-60 3.2E+04 4.6E+09 Cs-134 7.0E+05 5.3E+10 Zn-65 6.3E+04 1.7E+10 Cs-136 1.3E+05 5.4E+09 Rb-86 1.9E+05 1.6E+10 Cs-137 6.1 E+05 4.7E+10 Sr-89 4.0E+05 1.0E+10 Ba-140 5.6E+04 2.4E+08 Sr-90 4.1E+07 9.5E+10 Ce-141 2.2E+04 8.7E+07 Y-91 7.0E+04 1.9E+09 Ce-144 1.5E+05 6.5E+08 Zr-95 2.2E+04 3.5E+08 Np-239 2.5E+04 2.5E+06 Nb-95 1.3E+04 3.6E+08 1-131 1.5E+07 1.1E+ 12 Mo-99 2.6E+02 3.3E+08 1-133 3.6E+06 9.6E+09 Ru-103 1.6E+04 3.4E+ 10 Unidentified 4.1 E+07 9.5E+10 Ru-106 1.6E+05 4.4E+ 11 ---- ---- ----

Ag-110m 3.3E+04 1.5E+10 ---- ---- ----

The listed dose parameters are for radionuclides that may be detected in gaseous effluents . These and additional dose parameters for isotopes not included in Table 5-4 may be calculated using the methodology described in NUREG-0133, Section 5.2. 1 (Reference 2).

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 57 of 120 Table 5-5 Pathway Dose Factors Due to Radionuclides Other Than Noble Gases

Radio- Inhalation Meat Ground Plane Cow-Milk-Child Leafy nuclides Pathway Ri Pathway Ri Pathway Ri Pathway Ri (m 2 Vegetables (mrem/yr per (m2 x mrem/yr (m2 x mrem/yr x mrem/yr per Pathway Ri

µCitm 3) per µCi/sec) per µCi/sec) µCi/sec) (m2 x mrem/yr per µCi/sec)

H-3 1.12E+03 2.33E+02 0 2.38E+03 2.47E+02 Cr-51 1.70E+04 4.98E+05 5.31 E+06 5.75E+06 1.63E+06 Mn-54 1.57E+06 7.60E+06 1.56E+09 3.70E+07 5.38E+07 Fe-59 1.27E+06 6.49E+08 3.09E+08 4.01E+08 1.10E+08 Co-58 1.10E+06 9.49E+07 4.27E+08 7.01E+07 4.55E+07 Co-60 7.06E+06 3.61E+08 2.44E+10 2.25E+08 1.54E+08 Zn-65 9.94E+05 1.05E+09 8.28E+08 1.99E+10 2.24E+08 Sr-89 2.15E+06 4.89E+08 2.42E+04 1.28E+10 5.39E+09 Sr-90 1.01 E+08 1.01E+10 0 1.19E+10 9.85E+10 Zr-95 2.23E+06 6.09E+08 2.73E+08 8.76E+05 1.13E+08 1-131 1.62E+07 2.60E+09 1.01 E+07 4.95E+11 2.08E+10 1-133 3.84E+06 6.45E+01 1.43E+06 4.62E+09 3.88E+08 Cs-134 1.01 E+06 1.42E+09 7.70E+09 6.37E+10 1.96E+09 Cs-136 1.71 E+05 5.06E+07 1.64E+08 6.61E+09 1.60E+08 Cs-137 9.05E+05 1.27E+09 1.15E+10 5.75E+10 1.80E+09 Ba-140 1.74E+06 5.00E+07 2.26E+07 2.75E+08 2.03E+08 Ce-141 5.43E+05 1.45E+07 1.48E+07 1.43E+07 8.99E+07

Additional dose factors for isotopes not included in Table 5-5 may be calculated using the methodology described in NUREG-0133, Section 5.3.1 (reference 2).

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 58 of 120 6.0 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION 6.1 LIQUID EFFLUENT MONITORS 6.1.1 CONTROLS The radioactive liquid effluent monitoring instrumentation channels shown in Table 6.1-1 shall be OPERABLE with their Alarm/Trip setpoints set to ensure that the limits of Section 4.1.1 (Radioactive Liquid Effluents - Controls) are not exceeded.

The Alarm/Trip setpoints of these channels shall be determined and adjusted in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM.

6.1.2 APPLICABILITY

At all times.

Note: The Radioactive Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation may be removed from service for short periods of time without the instrumentation being considered inoperable for monthly/quarterly testing. Preventative/ corrective maintenance or calibrations require instrumentation to be declared inoperable.

6.1 .3 ACTION:

With a radioactive liquid effluent monitoring instrumentation channel Alarm/ Trip setpoint less conservative than required by the above control, immediately suspend the release of radioactive liquid effluents monitored by the affected channel, or declare the channel inoperable, or change the setpoint so it is acceptably conservative.

6.1.4 ACTION

With less than the minimum number of radioactive liquid effluent monitoring instrumentation channels OPERABLE, take the ACTION shown in Table 6.1-1.

Restore the minimum number of instrumentation channels to OPERABLE status within 30 days or explain in the next Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report, pursuant to Section 6.2 of the ODCM, why this inoperability was not corrected in a timely manner.

6.1.5 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS Each radioactive liquid effluent monitoring instrumentation channel shall be demonstrated OPERABLE by performance of the CHANNEL CHECK, SOURCE CHECK, CHANNEL CALIBRATION, and CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST at the frequencies shown in Table 6.1-2.

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 59 of 120 6.1.6 BASES The radioactive liquid effluent instrumentation is provided to monitor and control , as applicable, the releases of radioactive materials in liquid effluents during actual or potential releases of liquid effluents. The Alarmff rip setpoints for these instruments shall be calculated and adjusted in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM to ensure that the Alarmff rip will occur prior to exceeding the limits of 10 CFR 20.

The OPERABILITY and use of this instrumentation is consistent with the requirements of General Design Criteria 60, 63 and 64 of Appendix A to 10 CFR 50.

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 60 of 120 Table 6.1-1 Radioactive Liquid Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation Gross Activity Monitors (Liquid) Minimum Action Channels OPERABLE

a. Containment Fan Coolers (R-16) 1 1

b. Liquid Radwaste (R-18) 1 2 C. Steam Generator Blowdown (R-19) 1(a) 3

d. Spent Fuel Pool Heat Exchanger (R-20A, R-20B) 1 1

e. Turbine Bu ilding Floor Drains (R-21) 1 1

f. High Conductivity Waste (R-22) 1 2

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 61 of 120 Table 6.1-1 Table Notation (a) Not required when steam generator blowdown is being recovered , i.e. not released.

Action 1 If the number of OPERABLE channels is less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may continue provided that at least once per 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months grab samples are analyzed for isotopic concentration or gross radioactivity (beta or gamma) at a lower limit of detection (LLD) of at most 1.0E-07 µCi/gm.

Action 2 If the number of OPERABLE channels is less than required by the minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases from the tank may continue, provided that prior to initiating a release:

Note: When counting 2 independent samples for agreement, doubling the acceptance criterion for low (< 6.0E-05 µCi/ml) activity samples from 10%

to 20% results in a consequence at the release point of < 1%. The expanded acceptable criterion for low activity samples is employed to compensate for increased impact of sampling and counting error on acceptance.

1. At least two independent samples of the tank's contents, taken at least 60 minutes apart, are analyzed and agree within 10% of total activity, (20% if total activity minus noble gases< 6.0E-05 µCi/ml), and

2. At least two technically qualified members of the Facility Staff independently review and approve the analytical results, and

3. At least two technically qualified members of the Facility Staff independently verify the discharge line valving.

Action 3 When Steam Generator Slowdown is being released (not recycled) and the number of channels OPERABLE is less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may continue provided grab samples are analyzed for isotopic concentration at a lower limit of detection (LLD) of at most 1.0E-07 µCi/gram:

1. At least once per 8 hours9.259259e-5 days 0.00222 hours 1.322751e-5 weeks 3.044e-6 months when the concentration of the secondary coolant is

> 0.01 µCi/gram (DOSE EQUIVALENT 1-131).

2. At least once per 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months when the concentration of the secondary coolant is ~ 0.01 µCi/gram (DOSE EQUIVALENT 1-131).

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 62 of 120 Table 6.1-2 Radioactive Liquid Effluent Monitoring SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS Gross Activity Monitor (Liquid) Channel Source Functional Channel Check Check Test Calibration

a. Containment Fan Coolers (R-16) D(e) M(c) Q(b) R(d)

b. Liquid Radwaste (R-18) D(e) M(c) Q(a) R(d)

C. Steam Generator Slowdown (R-19) D(e) M(c) Q(a) R(d)

d. SpentFuelPoolHeatExchanger(R-20A, D(e) M(c) Q(b) R(d)

R-20B)

e. Retention Tank (R-21) D(e) M(c) Q(a) R(d)

f. High Conductivity Waste (R-22) D(e) M(c) Q(a) R(d)

g. Dilution Flow Rate Determination N.A. N.A. N.A. R(f)

CY-G 1-170-300 Revision 33 Page 63 of 120 Table 6.1-2 Table Notation (a) The FUNCTIONAL Test shall also demonstrate that automatic isolation of this pathway and control room alarm will occur if any of the following conditions exist:

1. Instrument indicates measured levels above the alarm and/or trip setpoint.

2. Power failure. (Verified in same functional test as Alarmffrip setpoint due to 3117 normally energized relay)

(b) The FUNCTIONAL Test shall also demonstrate that control room alarm occurs if any of the following conditions exist.

1. Instrument indicates measured levels above the alarm setpoint.

2. Power failure. (Verified in same functional test as Alarm setpoint due to 3/17 normally energized relay)

(c) This check may require the use of an external source due to high background in the sample chamber.

(d) Source used for the CHANNEL CALIBRATION shall be traceable to the National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST) or shall be obtained from suppliers (e.g. , Analytics) that provide sources traceable to other officially designated standards agencies.

(e) Applies only during releases via this pathway.

(f) Flow rate for the discharge canal dilution, which is applied to all liquid effluent pathways, shall be determined at the frequency specified.

CY-G 1-170-300 Revision 33 Page 64 of 120 6.2 GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORS 6.2.1 CONTROLS The radioactive gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation channels shown in Table 6.2-1 shall be OPERABLE with their Alarm/Trip setpoints set to ensure that the limits of Control Section 5.2.1 (Dose Rate - Controls) are not exceeded . The Alarm/ Trip setpoints of these channels meeting Control Section 5.2.1 (Dose Rate -

Controls) shall be determined and adjusted in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM.

6.2.2 APPLICABILITY

As shown in Table 6.2-1 Note: The Radioactive Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation may be removed from service for short periods of time without the instrumentation being considered inoperable for weekly grab filter or cartridge changes or monthly/quarterly testing ,

with the exception of the R-1 OA, R-11, R-12 skid. Preventative/corrective maintenance, calibrations, and moving filter replacements require instrumentation to be declared inoperable.

6.2.3 ACTION

With a radioactive gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation channel Alarm/Trip setpoint less conservative than requ ired by the above specification ,

immediately declare the channel inoperable.

6.2.4 ACTION

With less than the minimum number of radioactive gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation channels OPERABLE, take the ACTION shown in Table 6.2-1 .

Restore the minimum number of instrumentation channels to OPERABLE status within 30 days or, if not, explain in the next Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report, pursuant to Section 6.2 of the ODCM , why this inoperability was not corrected in a timely manner.

6.2.5 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS Each radioactive gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation channel shall be demonstrated OPERABLE by performance of the CHANNEL CHECK, SOURCECHECK, CHANNEL CALIBRATION , and CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST at the frequencies shown in Table 6.2-2 .

6.2.6 BASES The radioactive gaseous effluent instrumentation is provided to monitor and control, as applicable, the releases of radioactive materials in gaseous effluents during actual or potential releases of gaseous effluents. The Alarm/Trip setpoints

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 65 of 120 for these instruments shall be calculated and adjusted in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM to ensure that the Alarm/Trip will occur prior to exceeding the limits of 10 CFR 20. The OPERABILITY and use of this instrumentation is consistent with the requirements of General Design Criteria 60, 63, and 64 of Appendix A to 10 CFR 50.

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 66 of 120 Table 6.2-1 Radioactive Gaseous Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation Plant Ventilation (a)(h) Minimum Action Channels OPERABLE

a. Iodine sampler (R-1 OB or R-14AIODN) 1 (i) 1

b. Particulate Sampler (R-13 or R-14APART) 1 (i) 1 C. Noble Gas Activity (R-14 or R-14AGAS) 1 (b) 2

d. Containment Noble Gas Activity (R- 1 (d,e) 3

12) or Containment Particulate Sampler (R-11)

Containment Purge (c)(h) Minimum Action Channels OPERABLE

a. Iodine Sampler (R-1 OA or R-12AIODN) 1 (i) 1

b. Particulate Sampler (R-11 or R-12APART) 1 (f) 5 C. Noble Gas Activity (R-12 or R-12AGAS) 1 (f) 5 Air Ejector Monitor (g)(h) Minimum Action Channels OPERABLE Noble Gas Activity (R-15 or R-4 7) 1 4

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 67 of 120 Table 6.2-1 Table Notation (a) Required at all times .

(b) Only radiation monitor R-14 has an isolation signal. If H-14AGAS is being used to monitor batch gas releases , the contents of the tank(s) may be released to the environment provided that prior to initiating the release:

1. At least two independent samples of the tank's contents are analyzed, and

2. At least two technically qualified members of the facility staff independently verify the release rate calculations and discharge valve lineup.

(c) Required in MODES 5 and 6.

(d) The mini-purge system allows the release of Containment atmosphere through the plant vent. 10 CFR 100 type releases via mini-purge are limited by an isolation signal generated from Safety Injection. 10 CFR 20 releases through the mini-purge are considered to be similar to other plant ventilation releases and are monitored by R-14, R-13 and R-1 OB. R-14A may be used as a substitute for R-14 since automatic isolation is available from the R-11 or R-12 monitors if the activity in Containment increases. Therefore, either R-11 or R-12 is required to sample Containment during a mini-purge release. Automatic isolation of mini-purge for 10 CFR part 20 type releases is considered unnecessary due to the low flow associated with mini-purge, the continuous monitoring from R-11 or R-12 and the original measurement before the purge begins. To ensure the Containment sample monitored by R-11 or R-12 is representative of the containment atmosphere, at least one containment recirculation fan is required to be in operation during mini-purge operation .

(e) If the R-1 OA, R-11 , R-12 skid is not OPERABLE , it is possible to substitute the R-10B,R-13, R-14 skid when the R-14A skid is OPERABLE. The setpoints for the R-10A, R-11 , R-12 skid would be used. There would be no automatic containment isolation capability from the radioactive effluent monitoring instrumentation when using R-1 OB, R-13, R-14 skid for containment leakage measurements. This cannot be used if Containment Ventilation Isolation is required.

(f) If containment ventilation isolation instrumentation is required by LCO 3.3.5 for core alteration or movement of irradiated fuel in containment, R-12A skid cannot be used in place of the R-1 OA, R-11, R-12 skid.

(g) Required only when Air Ejector is operating .

(h) Gaseous effluent monitors are not considered inoperable due to changes in ventilation flow. Reduced flow in the ventilation makes the monitor setpoint more conservative.

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 68 of 120 (i) Minimum channels OPERABLE for Plant Vent Iodine, Plant Vent Particulate, and Containment Purge Iodine, refers to the sample collection system - not the radiation monitor.

Action 1 If the number of OPERABLE channels is less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may continue provided iodine and particulate samples are continuously collected with alternate sampling equipment as required in Table 6.2-1. This should be completed within one hour.

Action 2 If the number of OPERABLE channels is less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, continuous effluent releases via this pathway may continue provided grab samples are taken and analyzed for isotopic activity at least once per 8 hours9.259259e-5 days 0.00222 hours 1.322751e-5 weeks 3.044e-6 months . No batch gas releases are to be made with operable channels less than required minimum channels operable.

Action 3 If the number of OPERABLE channels is less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, or at least one containment recirc fan cooler is not in operation , within 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months terminate any mini-purge release in process.

Action 4 If the number of OPERABLE Channels is less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement and the Secondary Activity is ~ 1.0E-04 µCi/

gm, effluent releases may continue via this pathway provided grab samples are analyzed for isotopic concentration at least once per 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months . If the secondary activity is> 1.0E-04 µCi/gm , effluent releases via this pathway may continue for up to 31 days provided grab samples are taken every 8 hours9.259259e-5 days 0.00222 hours 1.322751e-5 weeks 3.044e-6 months and analyzed within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months .

Action 5 If the number of OPERABLE channels is less than required by the Minimum Channels Operable requirement, terminate the purge within 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months . Also refer to LCO 3.3.5 if core alterations or movement of irradiated fuel in containment is in progress.

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 69 of 120 Table 6.2-2 Radioactive Gaseous Effluent Monitoring SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS Plant Ventilation Channel Source Functional Channel Check Check Test Calibration

a. Iodine Sampler (R-1 OB) W(e) N.A. N.A. R(c)

b. Iodine Sampler (R- W(e) N.A. N.A. R(c) 14AIODN)

C. Particulate Sampler (R-13) W(e) N.A. N.A. R(c)

d. Particulate Sampler (R- W(e) N.A. N.A. R(c) 14APART)

e. Noble Gas Activity (R-14) D(e) M Q(a) R(c)

f. Noble Gas Activity (R- D(e) M Q(b) R(c) 14AGAS)

g. Flow Rate Determination N.A. N.A. N.A. R(d)

Containment Purge Channel Source Functional Channel Check Check Test Calibration

a. Iodine Sampler (R-1 OA) W(e) N.A. N.A. R(c)

b. Iodine Sampler (R- W(e) N.A. N.A. R(c) 12AIODN)

C. Particulate Sampler (R-11) W(e) M Q(a) R(c)

d. Particulate Sampler (R- W(e) M Q(b) R(c) 12APART)

e. Noble Gas Activity (R-12) D(e) M Q(a) R(c)

f. Noble Gas Activity (R- D(e) M Q(b) R(c) 12AGAS)

g. Flow Rate Determination N.A. N.A. N.A. 6Y(d) I 3/ 17 Air Ejector Monitor Channel Source Functional Channel Check Check Test Calibration

a. Noble Gas Activity (R-15) D(e) M Q(b) R(c)

b. Noble Gas Activity (R-47) D(e) M Q(b) R(c)

C. Flow Rate Determination N.A. N.A. N.A. R(f)

CY-G 1-170-300 Revision 33 Page 70 of 120 Table 6.2-2 Table Notation (a) The FUNCTIONAL TEST shall also demonstrate that automatic isolation of this pathway and control room alarm occur if any of the following conditions exist:

1. Instrument indicates measured levels above the alarm and/or trip setpoint.

2. Power failure. (Verified in same functional test as Alarm/Trip Setpoint due 3/ 17 to normally energized relay)

(b) The FUNCTIONAL TEST shall also demonstrate that control room alarm occu rs if any of the following conditions exist:

1. Instrument indicates measured levels above the alarm setpoint.

2. Power failure. (Verified in same functional test as Alarm Setpoint due to 3/ 17 normally energized relay)

(c) Source used for the Channel Calibration shall be traceable to the National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST) or shall be obtained from suppliers (e.g., Amersham) that provide sources traceable to other officially designated standards agencies.

(d) Flow rate for main plant ventilation exhaust and containment purge exhaust are calculated by the flow capacity of ventilation exhaust fans in service and shall be determined at the frequency specified .

(e) Applies only during releases via this pathway.

(f) Flow rate of the Air Ejector vent shall be determined with the plant in operation ,

at the frequency specified.

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 71 of 120 6.3 RADIATION ACCIDENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION

6.3.1 CONTROLS

The radiation accident monitoring instrumentation channels shown in Table 6.3-1 shall be OPERABLE according to the following schedule:

6.3.2 APPLICABILITY

1. Containment Purge (R-12A) - Modes 5 and 6 when the purge flanges are removed.

2. Plant Vent (R-14A) - All modes

3. Air Ejector (R-47 and R-48) - When air ejector is operating

4. A Main Steam Line (R-31) - Modes 1, 2, and 3

5. B Main Steam Line (R-32) - Modes 1, 2, and 3 Note: The Radiation Accident Monitoring Instrumentation may be removed from service for short periods of time without the instrumentation being considered inoperable for weekly grab filter or cartridge changes.

Preventative maintenance and calibrations require instrumentation to be declared inoperable.

6.3.4 ACTION

With less than the minimum number of radiation accident monitoring instrumentation channels OPERABLE, take the ACTION shown in Table 6.3-1.

6.3.5 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS:

1. Each radiation accident monitoring instrumentation channel shall be demonstrated OPERABLE by periormance of the CHANNEL CHECK and CHANNEL CALIBRATION at the frequencies shown in Table 6.3-2.

6.3.6 BASES

Radiation accident monitoring instrumentation is provided to monitor, as applicable, the releases of radioactive materials in gaseous effluents during actual or potential releases of gaseous effluents. The Alarm setpoints for these instruments shall be calculated and adjusted in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM to ensure that the Alarm will occur prior to exceeding the limits of 10 CFR

20. The OPERABILITY and use of this instrumentation is consistent with the requirements of General Design Criteria 60, 63, and 64 of Appendix A to 10 CFR 50.

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 72 of 120 Table 6.3-1 Radiation Accident Monitoring Instrumentation Instrument Minimum Action Channels Operable

a. Containment Purge Beta Particulate 1(a) 1 (R-12APART)

Containment Purge Iodine (R- 1(a) 1 12AIODN) Containment Purge Gas 1(a) 1 (R-12AGAS)

b. Plant Vent Beta Particulate (R- 1 1 14APART) Plant Vent Iodine (R- 1 1 14AIODN) 1 1 Plant Vent Gas (R-14AGAS)

C. Air Ejector Low-range Gas (R-4 7) 1 1,2 Air Ejector/Gland Seal Exhaust High-range 1 1 Gas (R-48)

d. A Main Steam Line (R-31) 1 1

e. B Main Steam Line (R-32) 1 1

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 73 of 120 Table 6.3-1 Table Notation (a) Only when the shutdown purge flanges are removed; otherwise, instrumentation kept in STANDBY mode.

Action 1 With the number of OPERABLE channels less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requ irements , either restore the inoperable channel(s) to OPERABLE status within 30 days of the event , or if not restored, prepare and submit, within the following 14 days, a Special Report to the Commission outlining the action taken, the cause of the inoperability and the plans and schedule for restoring the system to OPERABLE status. If the channel(s) is inoperable greater than 7 days but less than 30 days, report the cause of the inoperability and the actions taken in the Annual Radioactive Effluent Release

'

Report.

Action 2 R-47 is relied upon to trend and quantify primary-to-secondary leakage. If R- 5/17 47 is not OPERABLE with the air ejector in service, then enter procedures CH-RETS-RMS-INOP and CH-360.

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 74 of 120 Table 6.3-2 Radiation Accident Monitoring Surveillance Requirements Radiation Accident Monitoring Instrumentation Channel Channel Check Calibration

a. Containment Purge (R-12A) M R(a)

b. Plant Vent (R-14A) M R(a)

C. Air Ejector (R-4 7) M R(a)

d. Air Ejector/Gland Seal Exhaust (R-48) M Rta)

e. A Main Steam Line (R-31) M R(a)

f. B Main Steam Line (R-32) M R(a)

(a) Source used for the CHANNEL CALIBRATION shall be traceable to the National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST) or shall be obtained from suppliers (e .g., Analytics) that provide sources traceable to other officially designated standards agencies.

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 75 of 120 6.4 AREA RADIATION MONITORS 6.4.1 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS:

CHANNEL CALIBRATION, CHANNEL CHECK, and a FUNCTIONAL TEST of the area radiation monitors shall be performed as specified in Table 6-4.

CY-G 1-170-300 Revision 33 Page 76 of 120 Table 6-4 Area Radiation Monitor Surveillance Requirements Instrument Channel Functional Channel Check Test Calibration

a. Control Room R-1 D Q R

b. Containment R-2 D Q R C. Radiochemistry Lab R-3 D Q R

d. Charging Pump Room R-4 D Q R

e. Spent Fuel Pool R-5 D Q R

f. Nuclear Sample Room R-6 D Q R

g. lncore Detector Area R-7 D Q R

h. Drumming Station R-8 D Q R

i. Letdown Line Monitor R-9 D Q R

j. Component Cooling Water Heat Exchanger

R-17 D Q R

k. AVT A Mixed Bed R-23 N.A. Q N.A.

I. AVT B Mixed Bed R-24 N.A. Q N.A.

m. AVT C Mixed Bed R-25 N.A. Q N.A.

n. AVT D Mixed Bed R-26 N.A. Q N.A.

0. HCWT and LCWT R-27 N.A. Q N.A.

p. Resin Regeneration Tank R-28 N.A. Q N.A.

q. Nuclear Sample Room Wide Range Monitor R-33 N.A. Q N.A.

r. Containment Spray Pump Wide Range Area Monitor R-34 N.A. Q N.A.

s. PASS Panel Wide Range Area R-35 N.A. Q N.A.

Monitor

While not an area monitor by strict definition, it seNes as an indicator of internal leakage and provides an isolation signal for the component cooling system .

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 77 of 120 7.0 RADWASTE TREATMENT 7.1 LIQUID RADWASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM

7.1.1 CONTROLS

The Liquid Radwaste Treatment System shall be OPERABLE and appropriate portions of the system shall be used to reduce releases of radioactivity when the projected doses due to the liquid effluent to UNRESTRICTED AREAS would exceed 0.06 mrem to the whole body or 0.2 mrem to any organ in a 31 day period.

7.1.2 APPLICABILITY

At all times.

7.1.3 ACTION

With radioactive liquid waste being discharged without treatment and in excess of the above limits and any portion of the Liquid Radwaste Treatment System which could reduce the radioactive liquid waste discharged not in operation , prepare and a

submit to the Commission within 30 days Special Report that includes the following information:

1. Explanation of why liquid radwaste was being discharged without treatment, identification of any inoperable equipment or subsystems, and the reason for the inoperability.

2. Action(s) taken to return the inoperable equipment to OPERABLE status , and

3. Summary description of action(s) taken to prevent recurrence.

7.1.4 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS :

1. Doses due to liquid releases to UNRESTRICTED AREAS shall be projected at least once per 31 days in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM when Liquid Radwaste Treatment Systems are not being fully utilized.

2. The installed Liquid Radwaste Treatment System shall be considered OPERABLE by meeting Section 4.1.1 (Radioactive Liquid Effluents -

Controls) and Section 4.2.1 (Dose - Controls).

7.1.5 BASES

The OPERABILITY of the Liquid Radwaste Treatment System ensures that this system will be available for use whenever liquid effluents require treatment prior to release to the environment. The requirement that the appropriate portions of this system be used when specified provides assurance that the releases of radioactive materials in liquid effluents will be kept "as low as is reasonably achievable". This specification implements the requirements of 10 CFR 50.36a,

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 78 of 120 General Design Criterion 60 of Appendix A to 10 CFR 50, and the design objective given in Section 11.D of Appendix I to 10 CFR 50. The specified limits governing the use of the appropriate portions of the Liquid Radwaste Treatment System were specified as a suitable fraction of the dose design objectives set forth in Section II.A of Appendix A to 10 CFR 50 for liquid effluents.

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 79 of 120 Figure 7-1 Liquid Radwaste Treatment Systems Effluent Paths and Controls VENOOR SUPPUEO OEMlNERAUZATION SYSTEM REACTOR COOLANT CRAIN T A N K - - - - - -

HOT LAS C R A I N - - - - - - - - - - - .

EOUJPl,IENT C R A I N - - - - - - - - - -

EVAPORATOR CONO(NS(R OEMJN(RAUZER AUX!LlAR\' BU!LOINC SUMP 86SEM(NT LEVEL CRAIN --------.!

INTERMEOIATE 8UILOINC EQUIPMENT DRAIN WASTE HOLDUP TANK TANK 1 L------------------,

,...-----1 OEM!NERALIZER",_..-.,.I_ _ _ _ __ _ __ _ ___,

LAUNDRY ANO HOT SHOWER TANKS I I

TANK 2

.. lI I

I I uovro RAOWASTE I EFFLUENT LINE R-18 BORJC ACID MONITOR RECYCLE 1-----------'--.......i TANKS (2)

EVAPORATOR RETENTION TANK RCTEN110N TANK COMPOSITE SAMPUNC ,_..- - - , . . - - - - ' CONDENSATE SYSTEM CIRCULATING R-21 WATER (TO LAKE ONTARIO)

R-22 FNTA!NMENT FAN COOLER SERVICE R-16 WATER

~ENT f"UEL POOL HEAT E X C H A N G E R - - - - ~ - - - - - ~

R-20A R- 208 STEAM GENERATOR SLOWDOWN ------~--------__J R- 19

USE or THE OEUINERALIZER ANO WASTE CONDENSATE TANKS WAS OISCONTINUEO IN 1990.

USE Of THE LAUNDRY WAS OISCONTINUED IN 1994.

CY-G 1-170-300 Revision 33 Page 80 of 120 7.2 GASEOUS RADWASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM 7.2.1 CONTROLS The Gaseous Radwaste Treatment System and the Ventilation Exhaust Treatment System shall be OPERABLE and appropriate portions of these systems shall be used to reduce releases of radioactivity when the projected doses in 31 days due to gaseous effluent releases to areas at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY would exceed :

1. 0.2 mrad to air from gamma radiation , or

2. 0.4 mrad to ai r from beta radiation, or

3. 0.3 mrem to any organ of a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC

7.2.2 APPLICABILITY

At all times.

7.2.3 ACTION

With rad ioactive gaseous waste being discharged without treatment and in excess of the above limits, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days a Special Report that includes the following information:

1. Explanation of why gaseous radwaste was being discharged without treatment, identification of any inoperable equipment or subsystems, and the reason for the inoperability,

2. Action(s) taken to restore the inoperable equipment to OPERABLE status, and

3. Summary description of action(s) taken to prevent recurrence .

7.2.4 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS:

1. Doses due to gaseous releases to areas at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY shall be projected at least once per 31 days in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM when Gaseous Radwaste Treatment Systems are not being fully utilized.

2. The installed GASEOUS RADWASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM and VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM shall be considered OPERABLE by meeting Sections 5.2.1, 5.3.1 , and 5.3.7 (Controls).

7.2.5 BASES

The OPERABILITY of the Gaseous Radwaste Treatment System and the Ventilation Exhaust Treatment System ensures that the systems will be available for use whenever gaseous effluents require treatment prior to release to the environment. The requirement that the appropriate portions of these systems be used, when specified, provides reasonable assurance that the releases of radioactive materials in gaseous effluents will be kept "as low as is reasonably achievable". This Control implements the requirements of 10 CFR 50 .36a,

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 81 of 120 General Design Criterion 60 of Appendix A to 10 CFR 50, and the design objectives given in Section 11.D of Appendix I to 10 CFR 50. The specified limits governing the use of appropriate portions of the systems were specified as a suitable fraction of the dose design objectives set forth in Sections 11.B and 11.C of Appendix I to 10 CFR 50 , for gaseous effluents.

GAS DECAY TANK

{30 - 45 DAY DEU.Y)

C)

D,)

CJ)

CD 0

C eves PU.NT VENT CJ)

HOLDUP TANK I

R-14 . R-13 .

R-10B (OR RM-14A) :c D,)

+ a.

I I

WASTE GAS OXYGEN MONITOR

e D,)

I L------- -------- - ------ ----- ----- ~

....CD CJ)

CONTAINMENT MINI PURGE

=--i_ -f

""I CD

~---,

AUXILIARY BUILDING HEPA VENTIU.TION CHARCOAL D,)

SYSTEM 0 ....

CONDENSER AIR EJECTOR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 7 , : - - - -- - - - - - OFF GAS VENT 0 3

J CD (C

.... ::J C R-15, R-47 , R-48 ""I CONTAINMENT SHUTDOWN PURGE HEPA H CHARCOAL L-- - --5-,,-------*-

R-12, R-11, R-10A CONTAINMENT VENT

""I o en CD I

(OR RM-12A)

CJ)

CD I\)

3 CJ) m

-ti

-ti C

CD

J "tJ D,)

';j' CJ)

D,)

J a.

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 83 of 120 7.3 SOLID RADWASTE SYSTEM

7.3.1 CONTROLS

1. The solid radwaste system shall be used as applicable in accordance with the Process Control Program for the solidification and packaging of radioactive waste to ensure meeting the requirements of 10 CFR 71 prior to shipment of radioactive wastes from the site.

7.3.2 APPLICABILITY

At all times.

7.3.3 ACTION

If the packaging requirements of 10 CFR 71 are not satisfied, suspend shipments of deficiently packaged solid radioactive wastes from the site until appropriate corrective measures have been taken.

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 84 of 120 7.4 CONFIGURATION CHANGES

7.4.1 CONTROLS

Major changes to the Radioactive Waste Treatment Systems, (Liquid , Solid, and Gaseous) , shall be reported to the Commission by the inclusion of a suitable discussion or by reference to a suitable discussion of each change in the Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report for the period in which the changes were made. Major changes to Radioactive Waste Treatment Systems, (Liquid, Gaseous and Solid), shall include the following :

1. Changes in process equipment, components and structures from those in use (e.g., deletion of evaporators and installation of demineralizers);

2. Changes in the design of Radioactive Waste Treatment Systems that could significantly alter the characteristics and/or quantities of effluents released ;

3. Changes in system design which may invalidate the accident analysis (e.g. , changes in tank capacity that would alter the curies released).

Note: The Radioactive Waste Treatment Systems, are those systems used to minimize the total activity released from the site.

Note: Changing the filters used, replacement resins or minor modifications (pipe or valve dimensions or manufacturers) due to maintenance activities would not be considered a major change.

7.4.2 APPLICABILITY

At all times.

7.4.2 ACTION

The discussion of each change shall contain:

1. a summary, in accordance with 10 CFR 50.59, of the evaluation that led to the determination that the change could be made;

2. sufficient detailed information to support the reason for the change;

3. a detailed description of the equipment, components and processes involved and the interfaces with other plant systems;

4. an evaluation of the change which shows the predicted releases of radioactive materials in liquid and gaseous effluents from those previously predicted ;

5. an evaluation of the change which shows the expected maximum exposures to individuals in all UNRESTRICTED AREAS and to the MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC from those previously estimated ;

6. documentation of the fact that the change was reviewed and found acceptable by the Plant Operations Review Committee.

CY-G 1-170-300 Revision 33 Page 85 of 120 7.5 PROCESS CONTROL PROGRAM

a. The Process Control Program (PCP) shall be a document outlining the method of processing wet or dry solid wastes and for solidification of liquid wastes. It shall include the process parameters and evaluation methods used to assure meeting the requirements or 10 CFR Part 71 prior to shipment of containers of radioactive waste from the site.

b. Licensee may make changes to the PCP and shall submit to the Commission with the Radioactive Effluent Release Report for the period in which any change(s) is made a copy of the new PCP and a summary containing:

1. sufficiently detailed information to support the rationale for the change;

2. a determination that the change will not reduce the overall conformance of the solidified waste product to existing criteria for solid wastes; and

3. documentation of the fact that the change has been reviewed and found acceptable by the onsite review function.

c. Licensee initiated changes shall become effective after review and acceptance by the Plant Operation Review Committee.

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 86 of 120 8.0 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 8.1 MONITORING PROGRAM

8.1.1 CONTROLS

The Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) shall be conducted as specified in Table 8-1 at the locations given in Figures 8-1, 8-2, 8-3 and 8-4.

8.1.2 APPLICABILITY

At all times.

8.1.3 ACTION

1. If the radiological environmental monitoring program is not conducted as specified in Table 5-1, prepare and submit to the Commission , in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report , a description of the reasons for not conducting the program as required and the plans for preventing a recurrence. Deviations are permitted from the required sampling schedule if specimens are unobtainable due to hazardous conditions, seasonal availability, or to malfunction of automatic sampling equipment. If the latter, efforts shall be made to complete corrective action prior to the end of the next sampling period. Sampling periods for this specification are usually of one week duration. If continuous water sampling equipment is out of service , the 120 minute aliquot sampling period does not mean that grab samples must be taken every 120 minutes, but one grab sample once each week is sufficient until the automatic sampling equipment is restored to service.

2. If the level of radioactivity as a result of plant effluents in an environmental sampling medium at one or more of the locations specified exceeds the reporting levels of Table 5-4 when averaged over any calendar quarter, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days from receipt of the laboratory analysis a Special Report that identifies the cause(s) for exceeding the limit(s) and defines the corrective actions to be taken to reduce radioactive effluents so that the potential annual dose* to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC is less than the calendar year limits of Sections 4.2.1, 5.3.1 , and 5.3.7 (Controls) .

When more than one of the radionuclides in Table 5-4 are detected in the sampling medium, this report shall be submitted if:

co ncentra tion (1) + co nce ntration (2) + ~ > l .O limit level ( 1) limit level (2)

When radionuclides other than those in Table 5-4 are detected and are the result of plant effluents, this report shall be submitted if the potential annual dose to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from all radionuclides is greater than

CY-G 1-170-300 Revision 33 Page 87 of 120 the calendar year limit of Sections 4.2.1 , 5.3.1, and 5.3.7 (Controls) . This report is not required if the measured level of radioactivity was not the result of plant effluents; however, in such an event, the condition shall be reported and described in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report.

The methodology and parameters used to estimate the potential annual dose to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC shall be indicated in this report.

4. With milk or fresh leafy vegetable samples unavailable from one or more of the sampling locations indicated on Figure 8-2, a discussion shall be included in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report which identifies the cause for the unavailability of samples and identifies locations for obtaining replacement samples. In selecting replacement samples, consider the implications of collecting samples outside the normal REMP ingestion pathway. In particular, recognize that perennial vegetation from relatively undisturbed areas is likely to have higher concentrations of Cs-137 than vegetation grown in soil that is regularly disturbed by cultivation and harvesting activities. If a milk or leafy vegetable sample location becomes unavailable, the location from which samples were unavailable may then be deleted provided that a comparable location is added to the radiological environmental monitoring program as described in the ODCM ,

unless no other sample location is available.

8.1.4 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS:

The radiological environmental samples shall be collected pursuant to Table 8-1 from the specific locations given in the table and figure(s) given in the ODCM, and shall be analyzed pursuant to the requirements of Table 8-1 and the detection capabilities required by Table 8-3.

8.1 .5 BASES:

The REMP required by this Control provides representative measurements of radiation and of radioactive materials in those exposure pathways and for those radionuclides that lead to the highest potential radiation exposures to MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC resulting from plant operation. This monitoring program implementsSection IV.B.2 of Appendix I to10 CFR 50, and thereby supplements the RETS by verifying that the measurable concentrations of radioactive materials and levels of radiation are not higher than expected on the basis of the effluent measurements and the modeling of the environmental exposure pathways.

Guidance for this monitoring program is provided by the Radiological Assessment Branch Technical Position on Environmental Monitoring, Revision 1, November 1979.

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 88 of 120 Table 8-1 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program EXPOSURE PATHWAY NUMBER OF SAMPLES & SAMPLING AND TYPE AND FREQUENCY AND/OR SAMPLE SAMPLE LOCATIONS (a) COLLECTION OF ANALYSIS FREQUENCY

1. AIRBORNE

a. Radioiodine 5 indicator (Samplers 2,4,7,9,11) Continuous operation of sampler with Radioiodine canister. Analyze within 1 control (Sampler 8) sample collection at least weekly (a) 7 days of collection for 1-131.

b. Particulate 9 indicator Same as above Particulate sampler. Analyze for 3 control gross beta radioactivity ~ 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months following filter change.(c) Perform gamma isotopic analysis on each sample for which gross beta activity is > 10 times the mean of offsite samples. Perform gamma isotopic analysis on composite (by location) sample at least once per 92 days. (d)

2. DIRECT 30 indicator Dosimeters at least quarterly Gamma dose quarterly.

RADIATION (b) 9 control (11 placed greater than 5 miles from plant site)

3. WATERBORNE 1 control (Shoremont) Composite* sample collected over a Gross beta and gamma isotopic

a. Surface (e) 1 indicator (Condenser Water Dis- period of s 31 days. (f) analysis of each composite sample.

charge) Tritium analysis of one composite sample at least once per 92 days. (d) 1 indicator (Ontario Water District Same as above (f) Same as above

b. Drinking Intake) 1 control (Shoremont) Semi-annually Gamma isotopic analysis of each C. Shoreline Sediment 1 indicator (Ontario Water District - sample (d)

Bear Creek)

Composite sample to be collected by collecting an aliquot at intervals not exceeding 2 hours2.314815e-5 days 5.555556e-4 hours 3.306878e-6 weeks 7.61e-7 months .

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 89 of 120 EXPOSURE PATHWAY NUMBER OF SAMPLES & SAMPLING AND TYPE AND FREQUENCY AND/OR SAMPLE SAMPLE LOCATIONS (a) COLLECTION OF ANALYSIS FREQUENCY

4. INGESTION

a. Milk 2 Supplemental At least once per 15 days Gamma isotopic and 1-131 analysis (June through October) of each sample.(d,g}

3/17 2 Supplemental At least once per 31 days Gamma isotopic and 1-131 analysis (November through May) of each sample.(d,g)

b. Fish 4 control Twice during fishing season including Gamma isotopic analysis on edible 4 indicator (Off shore at Ginna) at least four species portions of each sample.(d ,g)

C. Food Products 1 control Annual at time of harvest. Gamma isotopic analysis on edible 1 indicator (On site) Sample from two of the following: portion of each sample.(d ,g)

1. apples

2. cherries

3. Other crops grown on site by contract farme r 1 control At time of harvest. One sample of: Gamma isotopic analysis on edible 1 indicator 1. broad leaf vegetation* portion of each sample.(d,g}

(Nearest offsite garden within 5 miles 2. other vegetable in the highest 0 /Q meteorological sector or onsite garden)

leaves from 3 different plant species composited

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 90 of 120 Table 8-1 Table Notation (a) Specific parameters of distance and direction sector from the centerline of the reactor, and additional description where pertinent, shall be provided for each and every sample location in Table 8-2 in a table and figures in the ODCM .

Deviations are permitted from the required sampling schedule if specimens are unobtainable due to circumstances such as hazardous cond itions, seasonal unavailability, inclement weather, and malfunction of automatic sampl ing equipment. If specimens are unavailable due to sampling equipment malfunction ,

effort shall be made to complete corrective action prior to the end of the next sampling period . All deviations from the sampling schedule shall be documented in the next Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report. It is recognized that, at times, it may not be possible or practicable to continue to obtain samples of the media of choice at the most desired location or time . In these instances suitable alternative media and locations may be chosen for the particular pathway in question and appropriate substitutions made within 30 days in the radiological environmental monitoring program as described in the ODCM. Submit in the next Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report documentation for a change in the ODCM including a revised figure(s) and table for the ODCM reflecting the new location(s) with supporting information identifying the cause of the unavailability of samples for the pathway and justifying the selection of the new location(s) for obtaining samples.

(b) One or more instruments, such as a pressurized ion chamber, for measuring and recordi ng dose rate continuously may be used in place of, or in addition to ,

integrating dosimeters. For the purposes of this table, a dosimeter is considered to be one phosphor; two or more phosphors in one packet are considered to be two or more dosimeters. Film badges shall not be used for measuring direct radiation . The 39 stations is not an absolute number. The number of direct radiation monitoring stations may be reduced according to geographical limitations; e.g., some sectors may be over water so that the number of dosimeters may be reduced accordingly. The frequency of analysis or readout for dosimetry systems will depend upon the characteristics of the specific system used and should be selected to obtain optimum dose information with minimal fading .

(c) Airborne particulate sample filters shall be analyzed for gross beta radioactivity 24 or more hours after sampling to allow for radon and thoron daughter decay.

If gross beta activity in air particulate samples is greater than 10 times the yearly mean of control samples, gamma isotopic analysis shall be performed on the individual samples .

(d) Gamma isotopic analysis means the identification and quantification of gamma-emitting radionuclides that may be attributable to the effluents from the facility.

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 91 of 120 (e) The "control sample" shall be taken at a distance beyond significant influence of the discharge. The "indicator sample" shall be taken in an area beyond but near the mixing zone.

(f) A composite sample is one in which the quantity (aliquot) of liquid sampled is proportional to the quantity of flowing liquid and in which the method of sampling employed results in a specimen that is representative of the liquid flow. In this program composite sample aliquots shall be collected at time intervals that are very short (e.g. , hourly) relative to the compositing period (e.g., monthly) in order to assure obtaining a representative sample.

(g) The dose shall be calculated for the maximum organ and age group, using the methodology and parameters in the OCDM.

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 92 of 120 8.2 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SAMPLE LOCATIONS All sample locations are specified on Table 8-2, a list of direction and distance to sample points. Indicator and control samples required by the environmental program are noted by an I or a C.

Figure 8-1 shows the onsite* sample locations for airborne particulates, radioiodine and direct radiation . Also indicated on Figure 8-1 is the onsite vegetable garden ,

as well as the placement of post accident dosimeters, locations 2 -7 and 13 -24.

Dosimeter locations 2 -7 are co-located with the air monitor samplers. The onsite garden is located in the SE sector near the closest resident who is the real maximally exposed individual , rather than in the ESE sector which has the highest D/Q.

Figure 8-2 gives the location of the milk herds near the plant. On this map is also 3; 17 included the Ontario Water District intake pumping station where lake water is sampled prior to treatment.

Figure 8-3 shows the offsite control locations for direct radiation as measured by dosimeters.

Figure 8-4 shows the offsite sample locations for airborne particulates, and radioiodine. Sample stations 9 and 11 are situated near population centers, Webster and Williamson , located approximately 7 miles from the Ginna Site.

Dosimeter locations 8 - 12 are co-located with air monitor samplers.

Onsite refers to the area surrounding the Ginna Plant bounded by Ginna property lines. Offsite refers to the area beyond the immediate Ginna property.

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 93 of 120 Table 8-2 Location, Direction, and Distances to Sample Points Air Sample Locations Station Type Coordinates Coordinates Direction Distance (Latitude, N) (Longitude, W) (degrees) (meters) 2 I 43.27798 77.30450 84 360 3 I 43.27643 77.30366 108 440 4 I 43.27561 77.30600 134 320 5 I 43.27602 77.30913 186 180 6 I 43.276 14 77.31198 236 300 7 I 43.27724 77.31177 259 240 8 C 43.22860 77.54403 254 19840 9 I 43.21872 77.42007 234 11150 10 C 43.16360 77.32606 186 12730 11 I 43.22327 77.18756 122 11540 12 C 43.26818 76.99870 92 25170 13 I 43.27091 77.31103 193 770 Water Sample Locations Station Type Coordinates Coordinates Direction Distance (Latitude, N) (Longitude, W) (degrees) (meters)

Shoremont C 43.27561 77.64368 270 27150 Ontario Water I 43.28963 77.28704 53 2220 District Intake Circulation Water s 43.28725 77.30928 358 1070 Intake Circulation Water I 43.27861 77.30857 13 110 Discharge Deer Creek s Points down- Points downstream N/A N/A stream from Outfall 006 from Outfall 006 Milk Sample Locations Station Type Coordinates Coordinates Direction Distance (Latitude, N) (Longitude, W) (degrees) (meters)

Farm A Farm B s

s 43.24196 43.17035 77.21978 77.12589 119 129 8240 19030 I 3/17

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 94 of 120 Produce Samples Description Type Coordinates Coordinates Direction Distance (Latitude, N) (Longitude, W) (degrees) (meters)

Onsite Gardens I 43.27278 77.30413 145 660 43.27627 77.30389 111 430 43.27727 77.30140 94 610 Purchased from C -- -- -- --

farms > 1O miles Fish Samples Sediment Samples Description Type Description Type Discharge Plume I OWD Shoreline I Lake Ontario> 10 mi les C Shoremont (> 1O miles) C West of Ginna Lake Ontario Benthic s Dosimeter Sample Locations Station Type Coordinates Coordinates Direction Distance (Latitude, N) (Longitude, W) (degrees) (meters) 2 I 43.27798 77.30450 84 360 3 I 43.27643 77.30366 108 440 4 I 43.27561 77.30600 134 320 5 I 43.27602 77.30913 186 180 6 I 43.27614 77.31198 236 300 7 I 43.27724 77.31177 259 240 8 C 43.22860 77.54403 254 19840 9 I 43.21872 77.42007 234 11150 10 C 43.16360 77.32606 186 12730 11 I 43.22327 77.18756 122 11540 12 C 43.26818 76.99870 92 25170 13 I 43.27889 77.31157 303 260 14 I 43.28032 77.31886 290 860 15 I 43.27708 77.32016 266 920 16 I 43.27310 77.31993 241 1030

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 95 of 120 Dosimeter Sample Locations (Continued)

Station Type Coordinates Coordinates Direction Distance (Latitude, N) (Longitude, W) (degrees) (meters) 17 I 43.27347 77.31162 206 510 18 I 43.27122 77.31082 192 730 19 I 43.27346 77.30868 178 460 20 I 43.27202 77.30650 163 650 21 I 43.27279 77.30408 144 660 22 I 43.27284 77.29960 125 920 23 I 43.27564 77.29969 107 780 24 I 43.27797 77.29993 87 730 25 C 43.23026 77.46891 248 14000 26 C 43.18249 77.43311 224 14600 27 C 43.16017 77.37563 203 14120 28 C 43.14851 77.18617 145 17450 29 C 43.23817 77.14423 108 14050 30 C 43.23687 77.05909 103 20760 31 I 43.26868 77.39841 262 7330 32 I 43.25309 77.37582 243 6070 33 I 43.22451 77.37458 222 7950 34 I 43.22582 77.34687 208 6520 35 I 43.21207 77.33044 193 7490 36 I 43.22840 77.30405 176 5480 37 I 43.22933 77.28251 158 5770 38 I 43.23135 77.25186 138 6910 39 I 43.25321 77.23025 113 6930 40 I 43.28071 77.22961 87 6440 63 I 43.27892 77.32344 228 740 64 I 43.27320 77.31571 277 1190 Table 8-2 Notes:

Latitude and longitude coordinates are based on World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84) datum.

Directions and Distance are noted from the centerl ine of thereactor I= Indicator Sample C = Control or background sample S = Supplemental sample

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 96 of 120 Figure 8-1 Location of Onsite Air Monitors and Dosimeters ODCM I L I

QJ

<JO ]

I I I i' ..

i" 0

(")

Q,)

0 0

_ll2dJ, ~ -ti Q,)

~ ............-~ ) ~

~ 3

.entario -ti

"'0

'ivYilliamsor I \ ~

s:

en -*

Q,) (C

!IB, C

14. 3. 3 ~

Q,) "'C (D (D

""' -(D CX)

I I\)

Q,)

~ .E~astPalmyra a.

Ne ,afK 0

) ::::,

~..._p Ort~G.b I son ...

Alloway Q,)

~

14 -

0

,,.,...,.- ~ --**---------** Q,)

~ ~ ~ n:c l i e ~ ...=e

' Shortsville < (D "1J 0

~

i\ !l) -<

a Water Sample Station ~: (0 lJ I C CD (I) G) 10 KM -* <O -

Milk Sample Station ~

..."' ...... ~- ......

II\ I ooo

-::I I

(") ...... (.,)

I\) (.,) 0

...-* 0 W 0

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 98 of 120 Figure 8-3 Location of Offsite Dosimeters U) 0

_J f-D

~ r-

.entario 0 0

Q) 0

s 0

.... "T1 0 (Q

........ C:-*

"""l

.. (1)

(1) 00

.East Palmyra I l> ~

"""l

~al, ,,

s:

>' 0 PorfGlbson ,

s 0

"""l

~ef.i1rc~ster.--~ "'

(~~\ ,

!\ ~ ;

5Miles '"'O 0 Sl) -<

(0 JJ I CD (1) G) 10 KM < -

co-*.!...

co~- .......

ooo I\)

=:::JW 0w OWO

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 100 of 120 Table 8-3 Detection Capabilities for Environmental Sample Analysis Lower Limit of Detection (LLD)

Analysis Water Airborne Fish Milk Food Shoreline (pCi/1) Particulate (pCi/kg) (pCi/1) Products Sediment Or Gas wet (pCi/kg) (pCi/kg)

(pCi/m 3) wet dry gross beta 4(a) 1.0E-02 3-H 2000 (1 OOO)(a) 54-Mn 15 130 59-Fe 30 260 58, 60-Co 15 130 65-Zn 30 260 95-Zr-Nb 15(b) 131-1 1 7.0E-02 1 60 134, 137-Cs 15(10)(a) , 1.0E-02 130 15 60 150 18 140-Ba-La 15(b) 15(b)

CY-G 1-170-300 Revision 33 Page 101 of 120 Table 8-3 Table Notation (a) LLD for drinking water (b) Total for parent and daughter The LLD shall be calculated as described in Notation (a) to Table 4-1

CY-Gl-170 .. 300 Revision 33 Page 102 of 120 Table 8-4 Reporting Levels for Radioactivity Concentrations in Environmental Samples Analysis Water Airbourne Fish Milk Broad Leaf (pCi/1) Particulate or (pCi/kg, wet) (pCi/1) Vegetables Gas (pCi/kg, wet)

(pCi/m 3)

H-3 2.0E+04 Mn-54 1000 3.0E+04 Fe-59 400 1.0E+04 Co-58 1000 3.0E+04 Co-60 300 1.0E+04 Zn-65 300 2.0E+04 Zr-Nb-95 400(a) 1-131 2 0.9 3 1.0E+02 Cs-134 30 10 1.0E+03 60 1.0E+03 Cs-137 50 20 2.0E+03 70 2.0E+03 Ba-La-140 200(a) 300

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 103 of 120 Table 8-4 Table Notation (a) Total for parent and daughter Decay correction in analysis of environmental samples is taken from the end of the sampling time not from the midpoint of the sample period.

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 104 of 120 Table 8-5 D/Q and X/Q 5 Year Average 1995 - 1999 Plant Vent Distance to section boundary in meters:

Direction 804m 1609m 2416m 3218m 4022m 4827m 5632m 6436m 7240m 8045m D/Q N 1.74E-09 8.20E-10 5.54E-10 3.36E-10 2.45E-10 1.85E-10 1.41E-10 1.13E-10 1.01E-10 3.86E-10 NNE 1.18E-09 6.28E-10 3.99E-10 2.75E-10 2.02E-10 1.53E-10 1.29E-10 9.54E-11 8.50E-11 2.26E-10 NE 1.74E-09 1.84E-09 6.26E-10 3.86E-10 2.83E-10 2.14E-10 1.64E-10 1.32E-10 1.09E-10 9.17E-11 ENE 2.99E-09 1.43E-09 8.56E-10 5.76E-10 4.25E-10 3.14E-10 2.39E-10 1.91E-10 1.58E-10 1.32 E-10 E 5.11 E-09 2.20E-09 1.23E-09 7.96E-10 5.69E-10 4.17E-10 5.09E-10 6.34E-10 4.74E-10 4.00E-10 ESE 7.41 E-09 3.19E-09 1.67E-09 1.13E-09 9.34E-10 9.18E-10 7.27E-10 5.1 6E-10 4.26E-10 3.54E-10 SE 4.14E-09 1.93E-09 9.91 E-10 7.32E-10 7.05E-10 5.40E-10 4.00E-10 3.05E-10 2.52E-10 2.09E-10 SSE 1.32E-09 6.71 E-10 3.72E-10 2.68E-10 2.58E-10 1.88E-10 1.38E-10 2.76E-10 8.94E-11 7.48E-11 s 2.15E-09 1.29E-09 7.37E-10 6.54E-1 0 4.95E-10 3.58E-10 2.61 E-10 2.02E-10 1.67E-10 1.39E-10 SSW 2.57E-09 1.48E-09 8.43E-10 5.50E-10 4.00E-10 3.95E-10 2.87E-10 2.22E-10 1.83E-10 1.52E-10 SW 2.88E-09 1.53E-09 8.50E-10 5.66E-10 4.79E-10 4.41 E-10 3.20E-10 2.49E-10 2.05E-10 1.71E-10 WSW 2.21 E-09 1.18E-09 6.93E-10 4.73E-10 3.57E-10 3.04E-10 4.38E-10 3.39E-10 2.80E-10 2.33E-10 w 9.54E-10 5.40E-10 3.27E-10 2.21 E-10 1.61E-10 1.20E-10 1.76E-10 2.71 E-10 2.25E-10 1.87E-10 WNW 1.29E-10 9.58E-11 6.87E-11 4.91 E-11 1.18E-10 2.83E-11 2.23E-11 1.82E-11 1.51 E-11 1.27E-11 NW 4.80E-10 3.03E-10 2.03E-10 1.41E-10 1.05E-10 8.01 E-11 6.25E-11 5.05E-11 4.20E-11 3.52E-11 NNW 1.37E-09 7.06E-10 4.40E-10 3.01 E-10 2.21 E-10 1.73E-10 1.29E-10 1.03E-10 8.59E-11 7.19E-11

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 105 of 120 Direction 804m 1609m 2416m 3218m 4022m 4827m 5632m 6436m 7240m 8045m X/Q N 8.56E-08 9.42E-08 9.1 9E-08 8.10E-08 6.99E-08 6.15E-08 5.38E-08 5.41 E-08 6.17E-08 1.20E-07 NNE 7.17E-08 8.06E-08 8.23E-08 7.45E-08 7.21 E-08 5.83E-08 5.28E-08 4.81 E-08 6.98E-08 1.33E-07 NE 8.27E-08 9.48E-08 9.36E-08 8.33E-08 7.23E-08 6.94E-08 5.63E-08 5.05E-08 4.57E-08 4.18E-08 ENE 1.05E-07 1.16E-07 1.06E-07 8.89E-08 7.41 E-08 6.26E-08 5.35E-08 4.66E-08 4.13E-08 3.70E-08 E 1.91 E-07 1.81 E-07 1.53E-07 1.16E-07 9.09E-08 7.32E-08 8.82E-08 7.67E-08 6.51 E-08 5.61 E-08 ESE 2.43E-07 2.13E-07 1.70E-07 1.35E-07 1.11 E-07 9.27E-08 7.19E-08 5.86E-08 4.96E-08 4.27E-08 SE 1.47E-07 1.38E-07 1.15E-07 1.12E-07 9.67E-08 7.43E-08 5.79E-08 5.33E-08 5.21 E-08 3.44E-08 SSE 6.06E-08 6.56E-08 5.66E-08 5.38E-08 4.55E-08 3.40E-08 2.64E-08 2.16E-08 1.83E-08 1.58E-08 s 1.06E-07 1.49E-07 1.27E-07 9.80E-08 7.10E-08 5.27E-08 4.09E-08 3.34E-08 2.83E-08 2.42E-08 SSW 1.06E-07 1.59E-07 1.54E-07 1.04E-07 7.61 E-08 6.96E-08 5.35E-08 4.35E-08 3.68E-08 3.16E-08 SW 1.06E-07 1.39E-07 1.43E-07 1.18E-07 1.01 E-07 9.76E-08 7.60E-08 6.22E-08 5.27E-08 4.53E-08 WSW 1.13E-07 1.40E-07 1.33E-07 1.23E-07 1.20E-07 1.30E-07 1.47E-07 1.20E-07 1.02E-07 8.78E-08 w 7.1 9E-08 1.0?E-07 9.56E-08 7.99E-08 6.66E-08 5.67E-08 9.77E-08 9.14E-08 7.77E-08 6.68E-08 WNW 6.07E-09 -1.64E-08 1.96E-08 1.87E-08 1.68E-08 1.49E-08 1.33E-08 1.20E-08 1.08E-08 9.88E-09 NW 1.99E-08 3.49E-08 3.64E-08 3.24E-08 2.80E-08 2.42E-08 2.11 E-08 1.86E-08 1.66E-08 1.50E-08 NNW 6.23E-08 6.98E-08 6.67E-08 5.74E-08 4.86E-08 4.15E-08 3.58E-08 3.20E-08 2.80E-08 2.53E-08

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 106 of 120 Table 8-6 D/Q and X/Q 5 Year Average 1995-1999 Containment Vent Distance to section boundary in meters:

Direction 804m 1609m 2416m 3218m 4022m 4827m 5632m 6436m 7240m 8045m D/Q N 1.88E-08 5.95E-09 2.88E-09 1.85E-09 1.31 E-09 9.45E-10 6.86E-10 5.31 E-10 4.42E-10 3.90E-10 NN E 1.86E-08 5.88E-09 2.85E-09 1.83E-09 1.29E-09 9.35E-10 6.79E-10 5.25E-10 4.39E-10 3.90E-10 NE 1.99E-08 6.30E-09 3.05E-09 1.96E-09 1.38E-09 1.00E-09 7.27E-10 5.62E-10 4.64E-10 3.86E-10 ENE 1.98E-08 6.28E-09 3.04E-09 1.95E-09 1.38E-09 1.08E-09 7.24E-10 5.60E-10 4.62E-10 3.84E-10 E 1.99E-08 6.30E-09 3.05E-09 1.96E-09 1.38E-09 1.00E-09 7.41E-10 5.75E-10 4.75E-10 3.95E-10 ESE 1.78E-08 5.66E-09 2.74E-09 1.77E-09 1.27E-09 9.19E-10 6.67E-10 5.16E-10 4.11E-10 3.54E-10 SE 1.01 E-08 3.23E-09 1.57E-09 1.05E-09 7.51 E-10 5.43E-10 3.94E-10 3.05E-10 2.52E-10 2.09E-10 SSE 3.66E-09 1.18E-09 5.75E-10 3.92E-10 2.85E-10 2.06E-10 1.50E-10 1.16E-10 9.56E-11 7.94E-11 s 6.65E-09 2.14E-09 1.0?E-09 7.06E-10 4.99E-10 3.60E-10 2.62E-10 2.02E-10 1.67E-10 1.39E-10 SSW 7.05E-09 2.28E-09 1.17E-09 7.53E-10 5.35E-10 3.95E-10 2.87E-10 2.22E-10 1.83E-10 1.52E-10 SW 7.77E-09 2.50E-09 1.22E-09 7.94E-10 5.98E-10 4.43E-10 3.22E-10 2.49E-10 2.05E-10 1.71 E-10 WSW 1.04E-08 3.32E-09 1.61 E-09 1.04E-09 7.44E-10 5.64E-10 4.39E-10 3.39E-10 2.80E-10 2.33E-10 w 8.42E-09 2.68E-09 1.30E-09 8.33E-10 5.89E-10 4.27E-10 3.46E-10 2.72E-10 2.25E-10 1.87E-10 WNW 2.68E-09 1.18E-09 4.16E-10 2.67E-10 1.89E-10 1.36E-10 9.92E-11 7.67E-11 6.34E-11 5.27E-11 NW 5.20E-09 1.66E-09 8.05E-10 5.16E-10 3.65E-10 2.64E-10 1.92E-10 1.48E-10 1.23E-10 1.02E-10 NNW 1.13E-08 3.58E-09 1.74E-09 1.12E-09 7.88E-10 5.70E-10 4.14E-10 3.20E-10 2.65E-10 2.20E-10

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 107 of 120 Di rection 804m 1609m 2416m 3218m 4022m 4827m 5632m 6436m 7240m 8045m XJQ N 1.73E-06 6.24E-07 3.58E-07 2.44E-07 1.52E-07 1.42E-07 1.15E-07 9.67E-08 9.34E-08 9.86E-08 NNE 2.15E-06 7.57E-07 4.37E-07 3.01 E-07 2.26E-07 1.78E-07 1.46E-07 1.24E-07 1.26E-07 1.48E-07 NE 1.94E-06 7.00E-07 3.99E-07 2.?0E-07 2.00E-07 1.55E-07 1.25E-07 1.05E-07 9.02E-08 7.88E-08 ENE 1.20E-06 4.40E-07 2.46E-07 1.64E-07 1.19E-07 9.14E-08 7.26E-08 6.03E-08 5.17E-08 4.50E-08 E 1.05E-06 3.91E-07 2.18E-07 1.44E-07 1.03E-07 7.84E-08 6.58E-08 5.39E-08 4.59E-08 3.96E-08 ESE 8.27E-07 3.15E-07 1.83E-07 1.24E-07 8.99E-08 6.76E-08 5.27E-08 4.32E-08 3.67E-08 3.16E-08 SE 5.82E-07 2.44E-07 1.56E-07 1.17E-07 8.36E-08 6.27E-08 4.88E-08 4.00E-08 3.39E-08 2.92E-08 SSE 3.27E-07 . 1.42E-07 8.76E-08 6.27E-08 4.44 E-08 3.31 E-08 2.57E-08 2.09E-08 1.77E-08 1.52E-08 s 5.09E-07 2.29E-07 1.40E-07 8.96E-08 6.92E-08 4.71 E-08 3.65E-08 2.98E-08 2.52E-08 2.16E-08 SSW 4.64E-07 2.44E-07 1.61 E-07 1.03E-07 7.31 E-08 5.49E-08 4.27E-08 3.49E-08 2.95E-08 2.54E-08 SW 4.99 E-07 2.52E-07 1.95E-07 1.36E-07 1.00E-07 7.59E-08 5.94E-08 4.87E-08 4.13E-08 3.56E-08 WSW 9.88 E-07 3.99E-07 2.57 E-07 1.99E-07 1.61 E-07 1.37E-07 1.11 E-07 9.16E-08 7.79E-08 6.73E-08 w 9.24E-07 3.62E-07 2.15E-07 1.49E-07 1.10E-07 8.62E-08 8.29E-08 6.83E-08 5.82E-08 5.03E-08 WNW 3.25E-07 1.26E-07 7.51 E-08 5.22E-08 3.92E-08 3.08E-08 2.51 E-08 2.11 E-08 1.83E-08 1.60E-08 NW 5.27 E-07 1.98E-07 1. 14E-07 7.80E-08 5.78E-08 4.50E-08 3.62E-08 3.03E-08 2.62E-08 2.29E-08 NNW 9.39 E-07 3.46E-07 1.98E-07 1.34E-07 9.89E-08 7.65E-08 6.13E-08 5.12E-08 4.41 E-08 3.85E-08

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 108 of 120 Table 8-7 0/Q and X/Q 5 Year Average 1995 - 1999 Air Ejector Distance to section boundary in meters:

Direction 804m 1609m 2416m 3218m 4022m 4827m 5632m 6436m 7240m 8045m D/Q N 2.02E-08 6.38E-09 3.09E-09 1.98E-09 1.40E-09 1.01 E-09 7.34E-10 5.68E-10 4.69E-10 3.90E-10 NNE 2.0?E-08 6.55E-09 3.17E-09 2.03E-09 1.44E-09 1.04E-09 7.54E-10 5.83E-10 4.81 E-10 4.00E-10 NE 2.11 E-08 6.66E-09 3.22E-09 2.0?E-09 1.46E-09 1.06E-09 7.67E-10 5.93E-10 4.89E-10 4.0?E-10 ENE 2.05E-08 6.49E-09 3.14E-09 2.01 E-09 1.42E-09 1.03E-09 7.47E-10 5.77E-10 4.77E-10 3.96E-10 E 2.04E-08 6.46E-09 3.13E-09 2.01 E-09 1.42E-09 1.02E-09 7.43E-10 5.75E-10 4.75E-10 3.95E-10 ESE 1.84E-08 5.80E-09 2.81 E-09 1.80E-09 1.27E-09 9.19E-10 6.67E-10 5.16E-10 4.26E-10 3.54E-10 SE 1.08E-08 3.43E-09 1.66E-09 1.06E-09 7.51 E-10 5.43E-10 3.94E-10 3.05E-10 2.52E-10 2.09E-10 SSE 4.12E-09 1.30E-09 6.30E-10 4.04E-10 2.85E-10 2.06E-10 1.50E-10 1.16E-10 9.56E-11 7.94E-11 s 7.19E-09 2.27E-09 1.10E-09 7.06E-10 4.99E-10 3.60E-10 2.62E-10 2.02E-10 1.67E-10 1.39E-10 SSW 7.89E-09 2.49E-09 1.21 E-09 7.74E-10 5.47E-10 3.95E-10 2.87E-10 2.22E-10 1.83E-10 1.52E-10 SW 8.85E-09 2.80E-09 1.35E-09 8.68E-10 6.1 3E-10 4.43E-10 3.22E-10 2.49E-10 2.05E-10 1.71 E-10 WSW 1.21 E-08 3.82E-09 1.85E-09 1.18E-09 8.37E-10 6.05E-10 4.39E-10 3.39E-10 2.80E-10 2.33E-10 w 9.68E-09 3.06E-09 1.48E-09 9.49E-10 6.71 E-10 4.85E-10 3.52E-10 2.72E-10 2.25E-10 1.87E-10 WNW 3.28E-09 1.04E-09 5.54E-10 3.22E-10 2.51 E-10 1.64E-10 1.19E-10 9.22E-11 7.62E-11 6.33E-11 NW 5.88E-09 1.86E-09 8.99E-10 5.77E-10 4.0?E-10 2.94E-10 2.14E-10 1.65E-10 1.37E-10 1.13E-10 NNW 1.22E-08 3.84E-09 1.86E-09 1.19E-09 8.43E-10 6.09E-10 4.42E-10 3.42E-10 2.82E-10 2.35E-10

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 109 of 120 Direction 804m 1609m 2416m 3218m 4022m 4827m 5632m 6436m 7240m 8045m XJQ N 2.34E-06 8.13E-07 4.56E-07 3.06E-07 2.24E-07 1.72E-07 1.37E-07 1.13E-07 9.72E-08 8.43E-08 NNE 3.01 E-06 1.02E-06 5.81 E-07 3.94E-07 2.91 E-07 2.25E-07 1.80E-07 1.49E-07 1.28E-07 1.11 E-07 NE 2.48E-06 8.?0E-07 4.88E-07 3.27E-07 2.40E-07 1.84E-07 1.47E-07 1.21 E-07 1.04E-07 9.01 E-08 ENE 1.51 E-06 5.37E-07 2.94E-07 1.92E-07 1.39E-07 1.05E-07 8.25E-08 6.79E-08 5.79E-08 5.01 E-08 E 1.28E-06 4.52E-07 2.44E-07 1.58E-07 1.13E-07 8.50E-08 6.65E-08 5.46E-08 4.65E-08 4.01 E-08 ESE 9.59E-07 3.28E-07 1.75E-07 1.13E-07 8.09E-08 6.08E-08 4.75E-08 3.90E-08 3.31 E-08 2.85E-08 SE 7.73E-07 2.65E-07 1.42E-07 9.20E-08 6.57E-08 4.95E-08 3.87E-08 7.93E-05 2.?0E-08 2.33E-08 SSE 4.47E-07 1.54E-07 8.18E-08 5.27E-08 3.75E-08 2.80E-08 2.18E-08 1.79E-08 1.52E-08 1.68E-08 s 6.59E-07 2.27E-07 1.21 E-07 7.75E-08 5.49E-08 4.11 E-08 3.20E-08 2.61 E-08 2.21 E-08 1.90E-08 SSW 6.43E-07 2.22E-07 1.19E-07 7.73E-08 5.52E-08 4.16E-08 3.25E-08 2.67E-08 2.26E-08 1.95E-08 SW 7.75E-07 2.65E-07 1.45E-07 9.61 E-08 6.96E-08 5.31 E-08 4.19E-08 3.46E-08 2.95E-08 2.55E-08 WSW 1.49E-06 5.11 E-07 2.86E-07 1.91 E-07 1.40E-07 1.08E-07 *a.58E-08 7.11 E-08 6.08E-08 5.27E-08 w 1.29E-06 4.52E-07 2.51 E-07 1.67E-07 1.22E-07 9.30E-08 7.37E-08 6.09E-08 5.21 E-08 4.51 E-08 WNW 5.27E-07 1.88E-07 1.05E-07 6.99E-08 5.10E-08 3.91 E-08 3.10E-08 2.56E-08 2.19E-08 1.90E-08 NW 7.90E-07 2.79E-07 1.54E-07 1.02E-07 7.39E-08 5.63E-08 4.45E-08 3.67E-08 3.14E-08 2.71 E-08 NNW 1.28E-06 4.51 E-07 2.49E-07 1.64E-07 1.19E-07 9.06E-08 7.15E-08 5.90E-08 5.04E-08 4.36E-08

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 110 of 120 8.3 LAND USE CENSUS 8.3.1. CONTROL A Land Use Census shall be conducted annually between June 1 and October 1, and shall identify within a distance of 5 miles the location in each of the 16 meteorological sectors of the nearest milk animal , the nearest residence , and the nearest garden of greater than 500 square feet producing broad leaf vegetation.

(In lieu of a garden census, broad leaf vegetation sampling of at least three different kinds of vegetation may be performed in an onsite garden located in the meteorological sector with the highest average annual growing season deposition parameter (D/Q) OR another location with a higher D/Q than the location of the maximally exposed individual.)

8.3.2 APPLICABILITY

At all Times .

8.3 .3 ACTION:

With a Land Use Census identifying a location(s) that yields a calculated dose or dose commitment greater than the values currently being calculated in Section 5.3.11 (Surveillance Requ irements) of the ODCM ,

identify the new location(s) in the next Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report.

With a Land Use Census identifying a location(s) that yields a calculated dose or dose commitment (via the same exposure pathway) 20% greater than at a location from which samples are currently being obtained in accordance with Section 8.1.1 (Radiological Environmental Monitoring -

Controls) , add the new location(s) within 30 days to the REMP described in the ODCM , if permission from the owner to collect samples can be obtained and sufficient sample volume is available. The sampling location(s), excluding Control location(s) , having the lowest calculated dose or dose commitment(s) , via the same exposure pathway, may be deleted from this monitoring program after October 31 of the year in which this Land Use Census was conducted. Submit in the next Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report documentation for a change in the ODCM including a revised figure(s) and table(s) for the ODCM reflecting the new location(s) with information supporting the change in sampling location(s).

8.3.4 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS The Land Use Census shall be conducted between June 1 and October 1 of each year using a method that will best provide the necessary information such as by door-to-door survey, vehicular survey, aerial survey, or by consulting local agricultural authorities. The results of the Land Use Census shall be included in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report pursuant to Section 9.1 of the ODCM.

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 111 of 120

8.3.5 BASES

This specification is provided to ensure that changes in the use of areas at or beyond the SITE BOUNDARY are identified and that modifications to the REMP given in the ODC Mare made if required by the results of this census. Information from methods such as the door-to door survey, vehicular survey, aerial survey, or from consulting with local agricultural authorities shall be used. This census satisfies the requirements of SectionlV.B.3 of Appendix I to 10 CFR 50.

Restricting the census to gardens of greater than 500 square feet provides assurance that significant exposure pathways via leafy vegetables will be identified and monitored, since a garden of this size is the minimum required to produce the quantity (26 kg/year) of leafy vegetables assumed in Regulatory Guide 1.109 for consumption by a child. To determine this minimum garden size, the following assumptions were made: (1) 20% of the garden was used for growing broad leaf vegetation (i.e., similar to lettuce and cabbage), and (2) there was a vegetation yield of 2 kg/m2.

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 112 of 120 8.4 INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM 8.4.1 CONTROL Analyses shall be performed on all radioactive materials supplied as part of an lnterlaboratory Comparison Program, that correspond to samples requ ired by the REMP, and that has been approved by the Commission, if such a program exists.

8.4.2 APPLICABILITY

At all times.

8.4.3 ACTION

With analyses not performed as required above, report the corrective actions taken to prevent recurrence to the Commission in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report pursuant to Section 8.4.1 (lnterlaboratory Comparison Program -

Control) of the ODCM.

8.4.4 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS The lnterlaboratory Comparison Program is described in and implemented by procedure CH-QC-INTERLAB. A summary of the results obtained as part of the above required lnterlaboratory Comparison Program shall be included in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report pursuant to Section 8.4.1 (lnterlaboratory Comparison Program - Control) of the ODCM .

8.4.5 BASES

The requirement for participation in an approved lnterlaboratory Comparison Program is provided to ensure that independent checks on the precision and accuracy of the measurements of radioactive materials in environmental sample matrices are performed as part of the Quality Assurance program for environmental monitoring in order to demonstrate that the results are valid for the purposes of Section IV.B.2 of Appendix I to10 CFR 50.

CY-G 1-170-300 Revision 33 Page 113 of 120 9.0 REPORTING REQUIREMENTS 9.1 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report An Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report covering the operation of the unit during the previous calendar year shall be submitted prior to May 15 of each year. The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report shall include summaries, interpretations, and analysis of trends of the results of the radiological environmental surveillance activities for the report period, including a comparison with background (control) samples and previous environmental surveillance reports and an assessment of the observed impacts of the plant operation on the environment. The report shall also include the results of the Land Use Census as required.

This report shall include any new location(s) identified by the Land Use Census which yield a calculated dose or dose commitment greater than those forming the basis of Section 8.1.1 (Radiological Environmental Monitoring - Controls)

The report shall also contain a discussion which identifies the causes of the unavailability of milk or leafy vegetable samples and identifies locations for obtaining replacement samples in accordance with Section 8.1 .1 (Radiological Environmental Monitoring - Controls).

The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report shall include the results of analysis of all radiological environmental samples and of all environmental radiation measurements taken during the period pursuant to the locations specified in the tables and figures of Section 5.0 of the ODCM, the summarized and tabulated results of these analyses and measurements shall be in the format of Table 9-1, derived from the Radiological Assessment Branch Technical Position, Revision 1, November 1979. In the event that some results are not available for inclusion with the report, the report shall be submitted noting and explaining the reasons for the missing results. The missing data shall be submitted as soon as possible in a supplementary report.

The report shall also include the following:

a. a summary description of the radiological environmental monitoring program including a map of all sampling locations keyed to a table giving distances and directions from the reactor centerline; and

b. the results of the licensee participation in an lnterlaboratory Comparison Program, and the corrective actions taken if the specified program is not being performed as required by Section 8.4.1 (lnterlaboratory Comparison Program - Control).

c. a discussion of all deviations from the sampling schedule specified in Table 8-1.

CY-G 1-170-300 Revision 33 Page 114 of 120

d. a discussion of any environmental sample measurements that exceed the reporting levels but are not the result of plant effluents, as required in the second ACTION of Section 8.1.3.

e. a discussion of all analyses in which the required LLD was not achievable.

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 115 of 120 9.2 ANNUAL RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT RELEASE REPORT The Radioactive Effluent Release Report covering the operation of the unit during the previous calendar year of operation shall be submitted prior to May 15 each year. This report shall include a summary, on a quarterly basis, of the quantities of radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents and solid waste released as outlined in Regulatory Guide 1.21 , Revision 1, with data summarized on a quarterly basis following the format of the Appendix thereof. For solid wastes, the format for Table 3 in Appendix B shall be supplemented with three additional categories: classes of solid wastes (as defined by 10 CFR 61 ), type of container (e.g. LSA, Type A, Type B, etc.) and solidification agent or absorbent (e.g. , Portland cement).

The Radioactive Effluent Release Report shall include an assessment of radiation doses from the radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents released from the unit during each of the previous four calendar quarters as outlined in Regulatory Guide 1.21 , Revision 1. In addition , the site boundary maximum noble gas gamma air and beta air doses shall be evaluated. The assessment of radiation doses shall be performed in accordance with Controls 1.2 and 2.3. This same report shall include an annual summary of hourly meteorological data collected I 3/17 over the previous calendar year. The Radioactive Effluent Release Report shall include a discussion which identifies the circumstances which prevented any required detection limits for effluent sample analyses being met. This report shall also include an assessment of the radiation doses from radioactive gaseous and liquid effluents to MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC due to their activities inside the SITE BOUNDARY during the report period . The assessment of radiation doses shall be performed in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM.

The Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report shall also include an assessment of radiation doses to the likely maximum exposed MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from reactor operation, including doses from effluent releases and direct radiation, for the previous calendar year to demonstrate compliance with 40 CFR 190.

This report shall include a list and description of unplanned releases from the site to UNRESTRICTED AREAS of radioactive materials in gaseous and liquid effluents made during the reporting period.

This report shall include any changes made during the reporting period to the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM). Licensee may make changes to this ODCM and shall submit to the Commission , with the Radioactive Effluent Release Report for the period in which any change(s) is made , a copy of the new ODCM and a summary containing:

CY-G 1-170-300 Revision 33 Page 116 of 120

a. sufficiently detailed information to support the rationale for the change;

b. a determination that the change will not reduce the accuracy or reliability of dose calculations or setpoint determ inations; and

c. documentation of the fact that the change has been reviewed and found acceptable by the Plant Operations Review Committee .

Licensee initiated changes shall become effective after review and acceptance by the Plant Operations Review Committee on a date specified by the licensee.

This report shall include any changes made during the reporting period to the Process Control Program (PCP). This report shall include a discussion of any major changes to the radioactive waste treatment systems.

The Radiological Environmental Operating Report and the Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report will be prepared and submitted to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Document Control Desk, Washington , D.C. 20555 and a copy to the Regional Administrator of the USN RC , Region I.

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 117 of 120 9.3 SPECIAL REPORTS Guidance is given for each of these reports in the applicable Control. The following general guidelines are included here for calculating dose to an exposed individual or the MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC for preparation of Special Reports:

a. The maximally exposed real MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC will generally be the same individual considered in the ODCM.

b. Dose contributions to the maximally exposed individual need only be considered to be those resulting from the Ginna plant itself. All other uranium fuel cycle facilities or operations are of sufficient distance to contribute a negligible portion of the individual's dose.

c. For determining the total dose to the maximally exposed individual from the major gaseous and liquid effluent pathways and from direct radiation , dose evaluation techniques used in preparing the Special Report will be those described in the ODCM , or other applicable methods where appropriate.

d. The contribution from direct radiation may be estimated by effluent dispersion modeling or calculated from the results of the environmental monitori ng program for direct radiation.

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 118 of 120 Table 9-1 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Summary R.E. GINNA NUCLEAR POWER PLANT Docket No. 50-244 WAYNE, NEW YORK Pathway Sampled Type And LLD Indicator Location With Highest Annual Control Unit Of Total Locations Mean Locations Measurement Number Of Mean (a)

Analyses Range Name, Distance Mean (a) Range Mean (a) Range And Direction Air: Particulate Gross Beta (pCi/Cu.M.)

Gamma Scan Iodine Gamma Scan Direct Dosimetry Gamma Radiation: (mrem/quarter)

Water: Drinking Gross Beta (pCi/liter)

Gamma Scan Iodine Surface Gross Beta (pCi/liter)

Gamma Scan Iodine Shoreline Sediment Gamma Scan Milk: (pCi/liter) Iodine Gamma Scan Fish: Gamma Scan Vegetation: Gamma Scan (a) Mean and range based on detectable measurements only. Fraction of detectable measurements at specified locations in parentheses.

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 119 of 120

10.0 REFERENCES

10.1 R. E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant Unit No. 1, Appendix A to Operating License No.DPR-18, Technical Specifications, Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation, Docket 50-244 10.2 USN RC, Preparation of Radiological Effluent Technical Specifications for Nuclear Power Plants, NUREG-0133 (October, 1978).

10.3 USN RC, Calculation of Annual Doses to Man from Routine Releases of Reactor Effluents for the Purpose of Evaluating Compliance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix I, Regulatory Guide 1.109, Revision 1 (October 1977).

10.4 "R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant Tracer Dilution Study for the Town of Ontario Municipal Drinking Water Intake," HydroQual, Inc. (May 28, 2010).

10.5 R. E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant, Calculations to Demonstrate Compliance with the Design Objectives of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix I, Rocheste r Gas and Electric Corporation , (June , 1977).

10.6 USN RC , Methods for Estimating Atmospheric Transport and dispersion of Gaseous Effluents in Routine Releases from Light-Water-Cooled Reactors, Regulatory Gu ide 1.111 , Revision 1 (July, 1977).

10.7 R. E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant, Incident Evaluation, Ginna Steam Generator Tube Failure Incident January 25, 1982, Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation , (April12 , 1982).

10.8 Pelletier, C. A. , et. al., Sources of Radioiodine at Pressurized Water Reactors, EPRI NP-939 (November 1978).

10.9 NUREG-1301, Offsite Dose Calculation Manual Guidance:

Standard Radiological Effluent Controls for pressurized Water Reactors.

10.10 International Comm ission on Radiological Protection , Publication 30 Supplement to Part I, "Limits for Intake of Radionuclides by Workers" (July 1978).

- ~

CY-Gl-170-300 Revision 33 Page 120 of 120 10.11 International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) Publication 2, "Permissible Dose For Internal Radiation ," 1959.

10.12 Nuclear Regulatory Commission Reg. Guide 1.21, "Measuring , Evaluating, and Reporting Radioactive Material in Liquid and Gaseous Effluents and Solid Waste," Revision 1, June 1974.

10.13 Nuclear Regulatory Commission Regulatory Guide 1.113, "Estimating Aquatic Dispersion of Effluents from Accidental and Routine Reactor Releases for the Purpose of Implementing Appendix I," Revision 1, April 1977.

10.14 Title 10 Code of Federal Regulation Part 20 (10 CFR 20), Standards for Protection Against Radiation.

10.15 Title 10 Code of Federal Regulation Part 61 (10 CFR 61 ), Licensing Requirements for Land Disposal of Radioactive Waste.

10.16 Title 10 Code of Federal Regulation Part 71 (10 CFR 71 ), Packaging and Transportation of Radioactive Material.

10.17 Title 40 Code of Federal Regulation Part 141 (40 CFR 141 ), National Primary Drinking Water Standards.

10.18 Title 40 Code of Federal Regulation Part 190 (40 CFR 190), Environmental Radiation Protection Standards for Nuclear Power Operations.

I L

ML18137A216

Text

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

10.0 REFERENCES

4.1.2 APPLICABILITY

4.1.3 ACTION

4.1.4 ACTION

4.1.6 BASES

4.2.2 APPLICABILITY

4.2.3 ACTION

4.2.4 ACTION

4.2.6 BASES

4.3.1 CONTROLS

4.3.2 APPLICABILITY

4.3.3 ACTION

4.3.5 BASES

5.2.2 APPLICABILITY

5.2.3 ACTION

5.2.5 BASES

5.3.1 CONTROLS

5.3.3 ACTION

5.3.6 BASES

5.3.7 CONTROLS

5.3.8 APPLICABILITY

5.3.9 ACTION

5.4.1 CONTROLS

5.4.2 APPLICABILITY

5.4.4 ACTION

5.4.6 BASES

6.1.2 APPLICABILITY

6.1.4 ACTION

6.2.2 APPLICABILITY

6.2.3 ACTION

6.2.4 ACTION

6.3.1 CONTROLS

6.3.2 APPLICABILITY

6.3.4 ACTION

6.3.6 BASES

7.1.1 CONTROLS

7.1.2 APPLICABILITY

7.1.3 ACTION

7.1.5 BASES

7.2.2 APPLICABILITY

7.2.3 ACTION

7.2.5 BASES

7.3.1 CONTROLS

7.3.2 APPLICABILITY

7.3.3 ACTION

7.4.1 CONTROLS

7.4.2 APPLICABILITY

7.4.2 ACTION

8.1.1 CONTROLS

8.1.2 APPLICABILITY

8.1.3 ACTION

8.3.2 APPLICABILITY

8.3.5 BASES

8.4.2 APPLICABILITY

8.4.3 ACTION

8.4.5 BASES

10.0 REFERENCES

Navigation menu

Search