ML18136A136
| ML18136A136 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Surry  |
| Issue date: | 10/02/1979 |
| From: | Stallings C Virginia Power (Virginia Electric & Power Co) |
| To: | O'Reilly J NRC Office of Inspection & Enforcement (IE Region II) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18136A135 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7911050117 | |
| Download: ML18136A136 (2) | |
Text
\\
()
~-;' *
- :*-~.~_\\:,::;,_,'"IJ
- .~. r..- ~**
t
'i I.......
t
~~ *,.,
VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY RICHMOND, VntGIN IA 23261 October 2, 1979 Mr. James P. O'Reilly, Director Office of Inspection and Enforcement U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II 101 Marietta Street, Suite 3100 Atlanta, Georgia 30303
Dear Mr. O'Reilly:
Serial No. 7 35 PO/RMT:baw Docket No. 50-281 License No. DPR-37 We have reviewed your letter of September 6, 1979, in reference to the inspection conducted at Surry Power Station on August 14-17,1979, and reported in IE In-spection Report No. 50-281/79-67. Our response to the specific violation is attached.
We have determined that no proprietary information is contained in the report.
Accordingly, the Virginia Electric and Power Company has no objection to this inspection report being made a matter of public disclosure.
Attachment cc: Mr. Albert Schwencer Very truly yours, z6. ->>?. \\ttfi~~
C. M. Stallings Vice President-Power Supply and Production Operations ccg 1]C/O~I?:
lil'raAL coPY!_.i
~----.,._ ___ _
7911050
NRC Comment:
Response to Notice of Violation Reported In Inspection Report No.
50-281/79-6 7
Attachment:
Page 1 of 1 As required by 10 CFR, Part 50, Appendix XII, '~Ieasures shall be established to assure that tools, gauges, instruments, and other measuring and testing devices used in activities affecting quality are properly controlled, c-ali-brated, and adjusted at specified periods to maintain accuracy within necessary limits".
Contrary to the above, during the above noted inspection, a set of uncon-trolled outside micrometers (12 inch to 18 inch, manufactured by Starrett, model number 724) were located in the pipe refurbishment building where work was being performed.
The calibration sticker on these outside micrometers specify a due date of July 1979; therefore, this instrument was out of calibra-tion.
In addition,. there were no control or.identification markings on the micrometer to verify that this was part of VEPCO's calibration control system.
This is a deficiency.
RESPONSE
The Deficiency is correct as stated.
- 1.
C9rrective steps taken and results achieved:
The Starrett Model /1724, size 12" -
18" micrometer has been properly marked and calibrated.
It has been entered into the calibration control system as required.
- 2.
Corrective steps taken to avoid further non-compliance.
The requirements of the calibration and control program have been re-emphasized to project personnel and supervision.
- 3.
The date when full compliance will be achieved.
Full compliance has been achieved.