ML18101A615

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Insp Repts 50-272/94-32 & 50-311/94-32 on 941205-19,950213-24 & 0314-15.Apparent Violations Being Considered for Appropriate Enforcement Action
ML18101A615
Person / Time
Site: Salem  PSEG icon.png
Issue date: 03/30/1995
From: Wiggins J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To: Eliason L
Public Service Enterprise Group
Shared Package
ML18101A616 List:
References
NUDOCS 9504070103
Download: ML18101A615 (3)


See also: IR 05000272/1994032

Text

"* .

Mr. Leon R. Eliason

Chief Nuclear Officer & President

Nuclear Business Unit

March 30, 1995

Public Service Electric and Gas Company

P. 0. Box 236

Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey 08038

SUBJECT:

SALEM ENGINEERING FOLLOWUP INSPECTION 94-32

Dear Mr. Eliason:

This letter refers to the safety inspection conducted by Mr. B. McDermott of

this office on December 5-19, 1994, and March 14-15, 1995, at the Salem

Generating Stations and on February 13-24, 1995, at the NRC Region I office.

The inspection was focused on issues important to public health and safety,

specifically, your actions taken in response to industry and NRC information

regarding nonconservatisms in the setpoint of the Pressurizer Overpressure

Protection System (POPS) for brittle fracture protection of the reactor

vessel.

The preliminary results were discussed with Mr. J. Summers, and

others of your staff, on December 19, 1994. A second exit meeting was

conducted by telephone with Mr. Summers on March 23, 1995 .

Four apparent violations were identified during our review of your actions to

resolve the POPS setpoint nonconservatisms, specifically:

(1) your reliance

on an exemption from the requirements of 10 CFR 50.60 without NRC approval;

(2) failing to report a condition outside the plant's design basis (10 CFR

50.72 and 50.73); (3) revising the plant's design basis without the safety

evaluation required by 10 CFR 50.59; and (4) failing to take appropriate

corrective actions for a significant condition adverse to quality (10 CFR 50,

Appendix B, Criterion XVI).

The details of these apparent violations are

discussed in the attached inspection report.

We acknowledge your position that the engineering significance of the problem

was considered to be low by engineering personnel and that the plant was

adequately protected. However, the fact that the issue was not entered into

an appropriate system for resolution of engineering discrepancies for over a

year indicates a significant weakness in your ability to understand and effect

prompt resolution of problems.

Even after the issue was entered into an

appropriate system, seven months passed before you determined that the plant

was outside it's design basis. Further, failure to perform a safety

evaluation for changes to the POPS design bases, as required by 10 CFR 50.59,

reflects a continuing weakness in your process for developing and implementing

effective corrective action .

070040

9504070103 950330

PDR

ADOCK 05000272

G

PDR

. . '

Mr, Leon R. Eliason

2

March 30, 1995

The apparent violations discussed above are being considered for appropriate

enforcement action and, accordingly, no Notice of Violation is presently being

issued for these findings.

You will be informed by separate correspondence of

any subsequent action required in response to the apparent violations.

Your cooperation in this matter was appreciated, and we would be pleased to

discuss the conclusions described in this report with you.

Docket Nos. 50-272; 50-311

Sincerely,

ORIGINAL SIGNED

BY~

James T. Wiggins, Director

Division of Reactor Safety

Enclosure:

Salem Inspection Report 94-32

cc w/encl:

J. J. Hagan, Vice President-Operations

S. LaBruna, Vice President - Engineering and Plant Betterment

C. Schaefer, External Operations - Nuclear, Delmarva Power & Light Co.

R. Burricelli, General Manager - Informations systems & External Affairs

J. Summers, General Manager - Salem Operations

J. Benjamin, Director - Quality Assurance & Safety Review

F. Thomson, 'Manager, Licensing and Regulation

R. Kankus, Joint Owner Affairs

A. Tapert, Program Administrator

R. Fryling, Jr., Esquire

M. Wetterhahn, Esquire

P. J. Curham, Manager, Joint Generation Department,

Atlantic Electric Company

Consumer Advocate, Office of Consumer Advocate

William Conklin, Public Safety Consultant, Lower Alloways Creek Township

Public Service Commission of Maryland

D. Screnci, PAO (2)

PUBLIC

Nuclear Safety Information Center (NSIC)

NRC Resident Inspector

State of New Jersey

State of Delaware

Mr. Leon R. Eli aso.n

3

Distribution w/encl:

Region I Docket Room (with concurrences)

J. Wiggins, DRS

E. Ke 11 y, DRS

Kay Gallagher, DRP

DRS Files (2)

Distribution w/encl: (Via E-Mail)

L. 01 sh an, NRR

W. Dean, OEDO

J. Stolz, PDI-2, NRR

M. Callahan, OCA

Inspection Program Branch, NRR (IPAS)

DOCUMENT NAME:

OFFICE

NAME

E

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

March 30, 1995