ML18094A712

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Summary of 890815 Meeting & Final SALP Repts 50-272/88-99,50-311/88-99 & 50-354/88-99.Hope Creek Needs to Reduce Personnel Errors in Listed Areas.Salem Performance in Operations,Maint & Emergency Preparedness Declined
ML18094A712
Person / Time
Site: Salem, Hope Creek, 05000000
Issue date: 09/25/1989
From: Russell W
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To: Miltenberger S
Public Service Enterprise Group
Shared Package
ML18094A713 List:
References
NUDOCS 8910020198
Download: ML18094A712 (98)


See also: IR 05000272/1988099

Text

Docket Nos.

50-272

50-311

50-354

Public Service Electric & Gas Company

ATTN:

Mr. Steven E. Miltenberger

Vice President - Nuclear

Post Office Box 236

Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey 08038

Gentlemen:

25 SEP 1989

Subject:

Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance (SALP) Report Numbers

50-272/88-99; 50-311/88-99 and 50-354/88-99

This refers to the evaluation of the Salem and Hope Creek Generating Stations,

operated by the Public Service Electric & Gas Company (PSE&G), conducted by the

NRC staff on June 28, 1989 and July 12; 1989, respectively.

These reports were

forwarded to you on August 9, 1989, and were discussed with you in a meeting

held on August 15~ 1989 at the site in Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey.

The list of attendees at the August 15, 1989 meeting and the presentation

materials are attached as Enclosure 1.

The NRC Final SALP Reports ~re attached

as Enclosures 2 and 3.

Our letter of August 9, 1989 (Enclosure 4) forwarded

the Initial SALP Reports and solicited your comments within twenty days of the

August 15 meeting.

Your letter of September 1, 1989, in response to the SALP

Reports is attached as Enclosure 5.

An errata sheet listing the changes made

in the Final SALP reports is attached as Enclosure 6.

The operation of the Hope Creek facility was characterized by a conservative

and safety conscious attitude.

Good management support ~nd oversight were

evident, and improving performance was noted in maintenance/surveillance,

engineering/technical support and safety assessment/quality verification.

Reduction of personnel errors is needed in the control of plant equipment,

surveillance scheduling, and procedural compliance.

The Salem facility was operated safely; however, performance in operations,

maintenance, emergency preparedness and safety assessment/quality verification

declined.

In particular, increased personnel and procedural errors and more

frequent plant transients resulted in a Category 3 rating in operations.

Good

performance was recognized in security, and performance enhancements were

effected in radiological controls and maintenance during the SALP period.

How-

ever, further improvements in attention to detail, procedure compliance and root

cause analysis are needed to reduce the frequency of safety system actuations

and missed surveillance tests.

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

SALP SALEM 88-99

09/19/89

0001.0.0

\\

\\ l

~(fo

Public Service Electric*

and Gas Company

-2-

25 SEP 1989

  • Your response of September 1, 1989, has been reviewed and the concerns

expressed in our report and during the August*15 meeting will be further

discussed during a subsequent meeting planned for October, 1989.

The Salem.

SALP report was changed to correct a tabular duplication of security event

reports.

The emergency preparedness assessment for both plants was revised to

be consistent with the inspection report which recognized a technical support

center weakness in not promptly recognizing containment failure.

We believe that our meeting and interchange of information was beneficial;

future meetings between NRC Region I and PSE&G management to apRrise us

of your progress and to discuss matters of mutual interest are encouraged.

No reply to this letter is required.

Your actions in response to the NRC SALP

will be reviewed as part of the on_going tnspection program at Salem and Hope

Creek.

Your cooperation is appreciated ..

Enclosures:

Sincerely,

~u~

u; *

Th

.....

  • .* '.:.*.

, .om11s 1. Mc..lUil

William T. Russell

Regional Administrator

1.

List of Attendees/Presentation Material

2.

SALP Report No. 50-272/88-99; 50-311/88-99

3.

SALP Report No. 50-354/88-99

4.

NRC Letter to PSE&G, dated August 9, 1989

5.

PSE&G Letter to NRC, dated September 1, 1989

6.

Errata Sheet

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

SALP SALEM 88-99 - 0001.0.1

09/18/89

Public Service Electric

and Gas Company

-

cc w/encl:

S. LaBruna, Vice President-Nuclear

-3-

J. Urban, General Manager, Fuels Department, Delmarva Power & Light Co.

L. K. Miller, General Manager, Salem Operations

J. J. Hagen, General Manager, Hope Creek Operations

B. A. Preston, General Manager, Licensing and Regulation

S. B. Ungerer, Manager, Joint Generation Projects Department, Atlantic Electric

Company

-General Manager, Nuclear Safety Review

M. J. Wetterhahn, Esquire

R_ Fryling, Jr., Esquire *

Licensing Project Manager, NRR (Salem and Hope Creek)

Public Document Room (PDR)

Local Public Document Room (LPDR)

Nuclear Safety Information Center (NSIC)

NRC Resident Inspector (Salem and Hope Creek)

K. Abraham, PAO, RI (19 copies)

State of New Jersey

Chairman Carr

Commissioner Rogers

Commissioner Curtiss

tommissioner Roberts

bee -w/encl:

Reg~on I Docket Room (with concurrences)

Management Assistant, DRMA (w/o encl)

DRP Section Chief

Monte Conner, DRP

J. Taylor, DEDNRR, RO&RES

J. Oyer, EDO

J. Lieberman, OE

W. Russell, RI

M. Knapp, DRSS

B. Boger, DRS

W. Kane, DRP

S. Co 11 ins, DRP

J. Linville, DRP,

P. Swetland, DRP

D. Holody, ES

--

~

RI: DRP

R_j, '

~ller/rhl

i:f~t

9/ /89

9/. /89 rt

Linville

91/ i89

tl~ir

911.\\ 189

R~ RI{,

M r't in

Ru s-e

9IVJl89

9/']/"};1'89

Enclosure 1

ATTENDEES AT SALP MANAGEMENT MEETING - AUGUST 15, 1989

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

W. Russell, Regional Administrator

S. Collins, Deputy Director, Division of Reactor Projects

J. Linville, Chief, Projects Branch No. 2

P. Swetland, Chief, Reactor Projects Section 2A

K. Gibson, Senior Resident Inspector, Salem

G. Meyer, Senior Resident Inspector, Hope Creek

D. Allsopp, Resident Inspector, Hope Creek

C. Shiraki, Project Manager, Hope Creek, NRR

J~ Stone, Project Manager, Salem, NRR

Public Service Electric and Gas Company

S. Miltenberger, Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer

S. LaBruna, Vice President, Nuclear Operatio~s

J. Hagan, General Manager, Hope Creek Operations

L. Miller, General Manager, Salem Operations

B. Preston, Manager - Licensing and Regulation

.J. Zupko, General Manager - Quality Assurance and Nuclear Safety Review

R. Burricelli, General Manager, Information Systems and External Affairs

L. Codey, Senior Vice President, Electric

T. Crimmins, Vice President, Nuclear Engineering

Others

Various attendees from the Public Service Electric and Gas Company staff,

Philadelphia Electric, Delmarva Power, Atlantic Electric, the State of New

Jersey and members of the press.

OPENING REMARKS: .

HOPE CREEK SALP

PRESENTATION:

SUMMARY:

LICENSEE COMMENTS:

Sr.,::-.,_. :\\ALP

h'---*.

v

PRESEinLTION:

AGENDA

SALEM/HOPE CREEK SALP

MANAGEMENT MEETING

AUGUST 15, 1989 .

W. RUSSELL REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR

J. LINVILLE, CHIEF, PROJECTS BRANCH NO. 2

P. SWETLAND, PROJECT SECTION CHIEF

GLENN MEYER I SEN I OR RES I DErn I NSPE{TOR

S. COLLINS, SALP BOARD CHAIRMAN

LICENSEE REPRESENTATIVE

P.

S~.'ETLAND

t. h~LVEY GIBSON, SENIOR

RESIDE~~ lN~:~~TJ~

,

.. - . ' J 1 * r

..:_,.,

Li.;LL

-~,)

'r, I

RUSSELL

I

' '

. '

OVERVIEW OF NRC SALP

FOR

HOPE CREEK GENERATING STAT10N

1/16/88 - q/3G/89

. '

OPERATIONS

  • ..

. .

CONSERVATIVE, SAFETY CONSCIOUS OPERATIONS

GOOD OPERATOR RESPONSE TO TRANSIENTS

NO TRIPS CAUSED BY OPERATORS

GOOD CONTROL OF OPERATIONAL ACTIVITIES'

EFFECTIVE FIRE PROTECTION PROGRAM

MINOR PERSONNEL ERRORS

NO RECOMMENDATIONS

,.

CATEGORY l

l

RADIOLOGICAL CONTROLS/CHEMISTRY

EFFECTIVE RADIOLOGICAL CONTROLS

WELL QUALIFIED STAFF

GOOD ALARA PROGRAM

.EFFECTIVE RADIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY

.

.

GOOD SELF-ASSESSMENT AND FOLLOWUP ,

NO RECOMMEND8TIONS *

CATEGORY 1

MAINTENANCE/SURVEILLANCE .

CATEGORY 2; IMPROVING

.*

. .

EFFECTIVE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM

MANY SURVEILLANCES CONDUCTED SATISFACTORILY

EFFECTIVE ISi AND IST PROGRAMS

WELL-QUALIFIED *STAFF

LAPSES IN WORK ~ONTROL CAUSED SAFETY. SYSTEM ACTUATIONS

MISSED SURVEILLANCES HAD MINIMAL SIGNIFICANCE

~O RECOMMENDATIONS

EMERGENCY PLANNING

(IHCLUDES BOTH SALEM AND HOPE CREEK)

GOOD EMERGENCY PROGRAM

WELL STAFFED AND SUPPORTED

RESPONSIVE TO.MOST PREVIOUS WEAKNESSES .

SOME INCONSISTENCY IN CLASSIFICATION

-

- ANNUAL EXE RC I SE PERFORMANCE DECL 1 NED .

10

RECQMMC"~IDl-TT('W('

1

\\

I II iLl1

r;. I ; vi\\..;

.

CATEGORY 2

. SECURITY

<INCLUDES BOTH SALEM AND HOPE CREEK>

HIGHLY EFFECTIVE SECURITY PROGRAM

WELL TRAINED STAFF

GOOD SELF-ASSESSMENT

EQUIPMENT UPGRADE PROGRAM*

RER WEAKNESSES AT SALEM

PROMPT CORRECTIVE ACTIONS

NO

RECOMMENDATIO~~S

.I

CATEGORY l

"*

ENGINEERING/TECHNICAL SUPPORT

CATEGORY 21 IMPROVING

REORGANIZED TO STRESS RESPONSIBILITY AND ACCOUNTABILITY

SYSTEM ENGINEERING EFFECTIVE, BUT WITH REDUCED EXPERIENCE LEVEL

COMPETENT STAFF

NEW DESIGN CHANGE PROCESS

MINOR PROBLEMS WITH MODIFICATIONS

NO RECOMMENDATIONS

,;.,

SAFETY ASSESSMENT/QUALITY VERIFICATION

CATEGORY 2; IMPROVING

  • *. GOOD SAFETY PERSPECTIVE

FREQUENT MANAGEMENT PRESENCE ONSITE

QUESTIONING ATTITUDE FOSTERED

GOOD SELF-ASSESSMENT AND FOLLOWUP

LICENSE SUBM.ITTALS GENERALLY COMPLETE AND-TIMELY

PERSONNEL ERRORS IN MOST AREAS

NO

RECOMMENDATIO~S

....

j

'

OVERVIEW OF NRC SALP

FOR

SALEM GENERATING STATION

1/1/88 - 4/30/89 '

OPERATIONS

CATEGORY 3

GENERALLY CONSERVATIVE APPROACH TO PLANT OPERATIONS

GOOD OPERATOR RESPONSE TO TRANSIENTS-

EFFECTIVE FIRE PROTECTION PROGRAM

HIGH NUMBER OF TRIPS

INATTENTION TO DETAIL

WEAK SUPERVISORY OVERSIGHT

INCONSISTENT ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS

PROCEDURE PROBLEMS

RECOMMENDATIONS

PSt&G PRESENT TO NRC, ACTIONS NEEDED TO REDUCE CHALLENGES TG

SAFETY SYSTEfS Pi~

1 1"1Jrr\\T EVENT

ti~;ALYSIS

l

..

RADIOLOGICAL CONTROLS/CHEMISTRY

CATEGORY 2

COMPLETION OF PROCEDURE UPGRADE PROGRAM

GOOD ALARA PROGRAM

EFFECTIVE RADIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY

WEAK

IHPLEMENTATIO~ OF NEW PROCEDURES <EARLY)

JNEFFECTIVE FIELD SUPERVISION <EARLY)

..

POOR INDUSTRIAL SAFETY PRACTICES <EARLY)

INCONSISTENT HOUSEKEEPING PRACTICES

PROBLEMS WITH PASS SYSTEM

EFFECTIVE RESPONSE TO IDENTIFIED WEAKNESSES

NO RECOMMENDATIONS

\\.

MAINTENANCE/SURVEILLANCE

..

EFFECTIVE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM

MANY SURVEILLANCES CONDUCTED SATISFACTORILY

GENERALLY GOOD PLANNING AND COORDINATION

IMPROVED WORK PRACTICE STANDARDS

IMPROVED GAUGE CALIBRATION PROGRAM

INCONSISTENT SUPERVISORY OVERSIGHT

INATTENTION DURING EQUIPMENT RESTORATION

'

CATEGORY 2

SEVERAL TRIPS FROM lNADEQUATE SURVEILLANCE ACTIVITI~S

CONTINUED MISSED OR LATE SURVEILLANCES

NO RECOMME~DATIONS

7'-.

\\

ENGINEERING/TECHNICAL S0PPORT

CATEGORY 2; IMPRQVING

REORGANIZED TO STRESS RESPONSIBILITY AND ACCOUNTABILi'TY

EFFECTIVE SYSTEM ENGINEERS

COMPETENT STAFF

NEW . DES I GN CHANGE PROCESS .

. .

CONTINUED MINOR PROBLEMS WITH DESIGN CHANGE PACKAGES

TRIPS DUE TO KNOWN EQUIPMENT PROBLEMS

NO RECOMMENDATIONS

    • .

SAFETY ASSESSMENT/QUALITY VERIFIFICATION

CATEGORY 2

GENERALLY GOOD SAFETY PERSPECTIVE

FREQUENT MANAGEMENT PRESENCE ONSITE

GOOD SAFETY REVIEW ACTIVITIES

GOOD QUALITY ASSURANCE ACTIVITIES

INCONSISTENCY IN ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS AND CORRECTIVE ACTION

DECLINE IN ATTENTION TO DETAIL AND SUPERVISORY OVERSIGHT

SLOW RESPONSE TO QA FINDINGS

INCONSISTENCY IN L1CENSE SUBMITTALS

NO RECOMMENDATIONS

.

.

.

T '

..

SEMI~ANNUAL **

MANAGEMENrf MEETING

Wlrl'H. 1'HE NUCLEAR

REGULATORY

COMM,ISSION

AUGUST 15, 1989

'

'

- - - -

__

j

SEMI-ANNUAL MANAGEMENT MEETING WITH NRC

AUGUST 15, 1989

~

SALEN ELECTRICAL UPGRADE PROJECT .

I

'

FIRE PROTECTION PROGRAM

SERVICE NATER PROJECT

. . . .

CBD PROJECT

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

HOPE CREEK OUTAGE l'IORKPLAN . . . . . . . .

REACTOR VESSEL HEAD LEAK PROGRAM .

STRIVING FOR EXCELLENCE

. . . .

. . . . . .

PROCEDURE UPGRADE PROJECT .... .

TECH SPEC SURVEILLANCE PROJECT .. . . . . . . .

Robert Skwarek

Craig Lambert

Karren Straubmuller

Michael.Metcalf

Joseph Hagan

Carl Timm

Stanley LaBruna

Lynn Miller

Lynn Miller*

RELIABILITY CENTERED MAINTENANCE PROGRAM . .

Daniel Strong

CLOSING COMMENTS . . . . *. . . . . . . . . . . . Steven Miltenberger

..

' -

NRC

PRESENTATION

Project Manager:

PM689153

  • ROBERT SKl'IAREK

August 15, 1989

! I

. I

(

. I

1.

'I \\

.!

't

Il

1

!

!'l

l

ll

!

AGENDA

HISTORY ,-

ACTION TAKEN

PROJECT SCOPE

ADDITIONAL ENHANCEMENTS

COST AND SCHEDULING

SALEM ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION

SYSTEM UPGRADE PROJECT

HISTORY I

e

AUGUST 26, 1986 EVENT -

-

SEPARA TEO FRON AVAILABLE OFF-SITE POJtlER

-

STARTED ANO LOADED DIESELS

e

CONNITTED TO THE NRC FOR THE FOLLOJ;ING

ACTION ITEMS:

-

IDENTIFY ROOT CAUSE

-

INPLENENT SHORT TERN CORRECTIVE ACTION

TO PREVENT RE-OCCURRENCE

-

PERFORM CONPLETE RE-EVALUATION OF SALEN

DISTRIBUTION SYSTEN ANO IDENTIFY

DEFICIENCIES

-

DESIGN ANO INPLEIENT INPROVENENTS

e

OCTOBER OF 1987 SHUT DOJ;N

P#S(/gJ37

-

DISTRIBUTION SYSTEN RE-EVALUATION

PROGRAM FOUND LACK OF OOCUNENTA TION

OF RELAY COOROINA TION CURVES BELOJtl

THE 4KV LEVEL

-

SHUT OOJtlN UNITS UNTIL CONPLETE

COOROINA TION STUDY JtlAS CONPLETE

-

RESTART IN DECEMBER 1987

,,

JAN 1987

FEB 1987

MARCH

THRU

NOV 1987

DEC 1987

MAY 1988

JUNE 1988

TO DATE

PM689141

INSTALLATION OF TENPORARY FEED FRON HOPE

CREEK ISLAND SUBSTATION TO SUPPLY 6 SALEN

CIRCULATING PIMPS.

DEVELOP SHORT TERN FIX TO A/MJST SECOND LEVEL

IJNDER VOLTAGE PROTECTION RELAY FRON 951 TO

92.61.

RE-EVALUATION OF SALEN ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION

SYS TEN.

CONPLETED PLOTS OF RELAY COORDINATION CURVES

FOR VITAL CIRCUITS.

-

NOOIFICATIONS NAOE USING

. SOLID STATE TRIP DEVICES

(SS 5'S) OR FUSE PROTECTION

TO ACHIEVE PROPER SELECTIVITY.

-

ALL CIRCUITS COORDINATED KITH

EXCEPTION OF 13 (240 AC) ANO

20 (125 VDC) CIRCUITS.

JUSTIFICATION llITHIN SAFETY

EVALUATION (# 'NRC-N87226) *

-

CIRCUITS llILL BE NOOIFIED.

-

CONPUTER PROSIWI ESTABLISHED

TO CONTROL SET POINTS SETTING

ANO COOROINA TION CURVES.

DEVELOPED DISTRIBUTION SYSTEN UPGRADES PROGRAN.

INPLENENT ENHANCENENT TO EXISTING LOAD

NANAGENENT PROGRAN TO NONITOR LOAD CHANGES

ON SYSTEN (i.e. BUS LOADING,

VOLTAGE DROP

AND SHORT CIRCUIT ANAL YSIS) .

SAT.EM ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION

SYSTEM UPGRADE *

DEVEL OPED A 5 YEAR UPGRADE

PROGRAM TO PERFORM THE

FOLLOWING OBJECTIVES:

P/tl689J27

-

INCREASE VOLTAGE RECOVERY

ON VITAL & GROUP BUSES DURING

. BUS TRANSFER

-

PROVIDE LOAD GROWTH CAPACITY

-

INCREASE SYSTEM MARGIN TD

MINIMIZE VOLTAGE DROP

CONDITIONS DURING DEGRADED

GRID CONDITIONS

-

IMPROVE PLANT RELIABILITY

PH689J26

PROJECT SCOPE

ADDITIONAL 13KV RING BUS WITH

IMPROVED DESIGN FEATURES

e

SEPARATE VITAL BUS FROM GROUP

BUSES

- e

DEDICATED SOURCE FDR VITAL BUSES

e

DEDICATED SOURCE FDR CIRCULATING

WATER PUMP LOADS (SIX PER UNIT)

ADDITIONAL 500/13KV TRANSFORMER

CAPACITY

l

AUX.

1RANS

PM689129

EXISTING

NORTH RING BUS

13KV

GROUP

BUSES

MAIN

1RANS

11 MAIN SPT

FINAL SWITCHYARD

CONFIBURA TION

NEW

lRANSFORt.ER


----------------------

NEW SWITCHGEAR

L----------------------------------~

llBJICA1ED 8fllllC£ Riii CRU.ITlll6

  • -/VI/I uw.

NEW SPT

NEW

SOUTH RING BUS

13KV

W'lt.

BUSES*

llBJICATBJ 8fllllC£

FORVJ'TALBlaB

  • EDOA

EDO B

EDO C

, ADDmONAL SYSTEM ENHANCEMENTS

. SEPARA TE CONTROL HOUSE

e

DEDICATED BATTERIES FDR SWITCHYARD

RELAY CONTROL

(REDUCE IE BATTERY

LOADS)

PMGa9128

e

UPDATE OVERALL SWITCHYARD CONTROL

SCHEME TD UTILIZE A SUPERVISORY

CONTROLS AND DA TA. ACGUISITIDN SYSTEM

(SCA DA)

-

TRANSFORMER MONITORING TO PROVIDE

EARLY WARNING OF TRANSFORMER

PROBLEMS

. -

ON LINE SELF DIAGNOSTICS FEATURES

e

UPDATE & REPLACE CONTROL ROOM MIMIC

DISPLAY PANEL

-

LA TEST HUNAN FACTOR REGUIRENENTS

REG. GUIDE 0700

e

REFURBISHMENT OF NORTH 13KV RING BUS

e . DESIGN FEATURES TD EXPEDITE VITAL

TRANSFORMER .CHANGE OUT

' ..

.

'

'

l

I

PHASE

SECUIITY

FENCE

CIRCll..ATINS

NATER

CONTROL

SYSTEM

e<>0/13KV

SlESTATION

RIN6 BUS

I!HENT

PMG891JO

ELECTRICAL UPGRADE PROJECT

SCHEDULE

ACTIVITY

CONPLETE SECURITY

FENCE NOVE

BUILD DUCT BANKS

CIRC WATER SUB FED

FROM HOPE CREEK

CONTROL SYSTEN

OEVELOPNENT

CONTROL SYSTEN

INSTALLATION

SWITCHYARD ENGINEERING

SWITCHYARD CIVIL

CONSTRUCTION

SWITCHYARO CONSTRUCTION

NORTH SIDE J3KV TIE

NORTH J3KV RING

REFURBISHMENT

1989

5,600K

1990

7,747K

NOVE 6 CliPs

FRON TENP~

CONST'

1991

16,434K

1992

3,101K

BESIN SCAIJA

INSTALLATI~

,____ ___

...._ __

Sl(YO CIVIL llORJ<


r-----:-r---- I.NIT #I

.-PAY FOR

y

EOUIPNEN

..-,

PlR--El-EC_B_"OiJ._~--'P-1

IL

DELIVERY

INSTALL

I* RIN6 BUS

I.NIT '2

VITAL SNAP

VITAL SI/AP

REJIOVE 6 Clif'll

FRON 6ROlP BIB

'V

I

TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET 35,89JK


FIRE PROTECTION PROGRAM

SALEM GENERA TING STATION

HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION

NUCLEAR ENGINEERING SCIENCES MANAGER

C.

W.

LAMBERT

FIRE PROTECTION PROGRAM

AGENDA

. BACKGROUND

ACCOMPLISHMENTS

UPGRADES IN PROGRESS

FIRE PROTECTION PROGRAM

BACKGROUND

SALEM

-

BTP 9. 5-1 APPENDIX A .

-

10CFR50 APPENDIX R SECTIONS III. G, J, L, 0

-

CONTINUOUS DIALOGUE JfITH NRC FROM 1979

TO PRESENT REGARDING COMPLIANCE CRITERIA

-

FIRE PROTECTION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

INITIATED IN LA TE 1986

-

ENGINEERING REORGANIZATION ESTABLISHED

PROGRAMMATIC SPONSOR FOR FIRE PROTECTION

IN 1987

FIRE PROTECTION PROGRAM

HOPE CREEK

BACKGROUND

(Continued)

- STANDARD REVIEJY PLAN SECTION 9. 5.1

- ENCOMPASSES APPENDIX A AND APPENDIX R

- 'EXTENSIVE NRC REVIEW FROM 1984 -

1986 IN

SUPPORT OF APPLICA TIDN FDR OPERA TING

LICENSE

ACCOMPLISHMENTS

SALEM GENERATING STATION

  • FIRE PROTECTION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM COMPLETE
  • PROGRAMMATIC AND TECHNICAL STANDARDS ISSUED
  • LER RELATED CABLE SEPARATION ISSUES
  • COMPLETED
  • EXEMPTION REQUESTS APPROVED BY NRC

(JULY 20,

1989)

ACCOMPLISHMENTS

(Continued}

HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION

PENETRATION SEAL PROGRAM

-

INVOL VED 20, * 500 SEALS .

-

IDENTIFICATION LABELING

-

ESTABLISHED CONTROLLED DA TA BASE (MMIS)

-

CORRELA TED SEAL DETAILS TO TESTING

-

CORRELATION BETWEEN PENETRATING

COMPONENTS AND SEAL ID

-

UPGRADED 2, 300 SEALS

-ACCOMPLISHMENTS

-

-

(Continued)

HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION

PENETRATION SEALS IN ARCHITECTUAL PANEL

WALLS

-

INVOLVED 44 PANEL WALL 'BARRIERS AND 246

PENETRATIONS

-

ESTABLISHED BASELINE CONFIGURATION

-

40 BARRIERS CONFIRMED ADEQUATE BY GLBB-10

ENGINEERING EVALUATIONS

-

134 SEALS UPGRADED _BY REWORK/REPLACEMENT

UPGRADES IN PROGRESS

SALEM GENERA TING STATION

EXPANDING SUPPRESSION IN AFJY AREA

AUTOMATION OF FOUR SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS

UPGRADING FIRE DOORS

EVALUATING RECENTLY APPROVED EXEMPTION

REGUEST

PENETRATION SEAL PROGRAM

FIRE DAMPER EVALUA TIDN



UPGRADES IN PROGRESS

SALEM PENETRATION SEAL PROGRAM

SEALS AND REPAIR, REPLACE OR UPGRADE AS

REQUIRED_

  • ESTABLISH BASELINE CONFIGURATION

DOCUMENTATION WHICH PROVIDES SEAL LOCATION,

SEAL DETAIL,. AND OTHER DESIGN INFORMATION *

  • ESTABLISH COMPONENT IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS

AND PROVIDE LABELS (BAR CODED/ FOR

IDENTIFICATION AND TRACKING

  • ESTABLISH DESIGN, INSTALLATION AND TRAINING

PROCEDURES FOR USE BY PSE&G PERSONNEL

  • ESTABLISH A PROGRAM THAT IS FULLY DOCUMENTED

TO

CONTROL FUTURE DESIGN CHANGES AND

-

MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES

UPGRADES IN PROGRESS

(Continued}

SALEM PENETRATION SEAL PROGRAM

CURRENT STATUS

TOTAL NUMBER OF SEALS

10, 500 .

NUMBER- OF SEALS VERIFIED

6, 165

AS OF 8/1/89

NUMBER OF SEALS UPGRADED

1, 663 .

AS OF 8/1/89

NUMBER OF SEALS ACCEPTED (AS-IS)

  • 1, 074

AS OF 8/1/89

FIELD WORK TO BE COMPLETED BY

4/90

DOCUMENTATION CLOSEOUT BY

. 10/90

UPGRADES IN PROGRESS

SALEM FIRE DAMPERS

  • 167 FIRE DAMPERS (TOTAL BOTH UNITS)

- 75 MEET BARRIER REQUIREMENTS

- 13 CAN BE QUALIFIED FDR USE AS-IS

- 25 MUST BE REPLACED (1-1/2 HR QUALIFIED

VERSUS 3 HRS REQUIRED)

- 54 UPGRADE/QUALIFICA TIDN VIA TESTING

WITH MANUFACTURER

SCHEDULE

  • HORIZONTAL TEST FDR 1-1/2 HOUR

QUALIFICA*TION BY 12/89

. * TARGET COMPLETION FDR UPGRADE/REPLACEMENT -

12/91


---

~.

UPGRADES IN PROGRESS

HOPE CREEK GENERA TING STATION

INTERNAL CONDUIT SEAL (ICS) PROJECT

- CONFIRM COMPLIANCE FOR INTERNAL CONDUIT

SEALS WITH THE UFSAR BTP FIRE BARRIERS

- FIELD WALKDOWN APPROXIMATELY 15, 000

CONDUITS

-

VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS MEET DESIGN

REQUIREMENTS BASED ON ENGINEERING .

EVALUATION

- REWORK/INSTALLATION OF ICS WHERE

REQUIRED TO MEET ESTABLISHED BARRIER

CRITERIA

- ESTABLISH A CONTROLLED BASELINE

CONFIGURATION -THROUGH THE USE OF THE

MMIS DATABASE

- RE-EVALUATING THE DESIGN BASIS FDR ICS

BASED ON INDUSTRY PRECEDENT AND TESTING

EXPERIENCE

UPGRADES IN PROGRESS

-

(Continued)

HOPE CREEK GENERA TING STATION

SCHEDULE

  • ENGINEERING/DESIGN

8/89 -- 3/90

  • FIELD VERIFICATION/UPGRADE

4/90 -- 6/91

  • DOCUMENTATION CLOSURE

THROUGH 6/92

PROGRAM COST.

SALEM

FIRE PROTECTION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM . 1. 8 MILLION

PENETRATION SEAL PROGRAM

15.0 MILLION

APPENDIX R MODIFICATIONS

17. 0 MILLION

HOPE CREEK

PENETRATION SEAL PROGRAM

6. 4 MILLION

PENETRATION SEALS IN ARCHITECTURAL

. 4 MILLION

PANEL WALLS

INTERNAL CONDUIT SEAL PROJECT

13.1 MILLION

I SERVICE WATER PROJECT

. SALEM & HOPE CREEK

GENERA TING STATIONS

PROJECT MANAGER

W. STRAUBMULLER

\\.

!'

  • '*

, , AGENDA I

,*BACKGROUND

  • ACCOMPLISHMENTS

(SALEN / HOPE CREEK)

  • SCHEDULED 1990 UPGRADES
  • MONITORING

BACKGROUND

SIGNIFICANT PIPING - EOUIPMENT

CORROSION/EROSION PROBLEMS

-

AGGRESSIVE RIVER JtlA TER CHEMISTRY

-

SILT ENTRAINMENT

-

CAVITATION

-

STAGNANT LINES

-

MACRO BIOLOGICAL ACTIVITY

-

NIC ACTIVITY

tMJlll, .

....

I BACKGROUND CONT'

e HIGH MAINTENANCE AND OPERA TING DEFICIENCI£

-

SIGNIFICANT PORTION OF. THE

STATION'S DEFICIENCY REPORTS

& EOUIPNENT OUTAGES

-

INCREASED O&N COSTS EVERY YEAR SINCE !977 .

-

RESPONSIBLE FOR EXTENDED REFUELING OUTAGE

-

RESOURCE INTENSIVE

BACKGROUND CONT'

e MOBILIZED A DEDICATED PROJECT TEAM IN 1987

e IDENTIFIED PROBLEM AREAS

e ESTABLISHED GOALS

e ESTABLISH PRIORITIES

e ESTABLISH A NA TERIAL TEST PROGRAM

e SELECTED 6% NOL Y STAINLESS AS REPLACEMENT

MATERIAL -

e INITIATED A -SYS TEN INSPECTION AND NONITORIM

PRO GRAN

e DEVELOPED A 7 YEAR PROJECT PLAN ($83 NILLION)

e WORK PACKAGES HAVE BEEN DEVELOPED AND

PRIORITIZED BY ENGINEERING EVALUATION

AND FIELD INSPECTIONS

-

ACCOMPLISHMENTS

SALEM GENERA TING STATION

e REPLACED PIPING ABO.VE ELEVATION 104'-o* ON 8

OF f 0 CONTAINNENT FAN COIL UNITS (5-UNIT #1)

& (3-UNIT #2)

e REPLACED SELECTED AREAS OF INLET ANO OUTLET PIPIM

ON 11 & 22 CONPONTENT COOLING HEAT EXCHANGERS

e REPLACED All 14 NOTOR OPERATED BUTTERFLY VALVES

IN THE SERVICE JrlATER INTAKE STRUCTURE KITH- HI-

PERFORNANCE VALVES (7-UNIT #1) & (7-UNIT #2)

e ELININA TEO 14 RUBBER EXPANSION JOINTS ANO REPLACB

JrlITH HARO PIPING IN THE SERVICE JrlA TER INTAKE

STRUCTURE (7-UNIT #1) & (7-UNIT #2)

e REPLACED All 12 SERVICE ltA TER PUNP DISCHARGE

STRAINERS (6 UNIT #1) & (6 UNIT #2)

l

  • ACCOMPLISHMEN~

(CONT'D)

HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION

e INCONEL OVERLAYED 8 - SACS HEAT EXCHANGER

SPOOLS

e SECOND REFUELING OUTAGE SCHEDULED FOR

(SEPT., 1989)

-

REPLACE SELECTED AREAS OF RACS OVERBOARD

OUTLET PIPING

-

REPLACE 24* CHECK VALVE NITH HI-PERFORNANCE *.

. BUTTERFLY VAL VE

-

lscHEDULED 1990 UPGRADE.

SALEM GENERA TING STATION

e PIPING REPLACEMENT ABOVE ELEVATION 104'-o* ON THE

REMAINING (2) CONTAINMENT FAN COIL UNITS (24 & 25)

(UNIT #2)

e PIPING REPLACEMENT PENETRATION AREA

CONTAINMENT FAN COIL UNIT VAL VE ROOMS

(BOTH UNITS)

e PIPING REPLACENENT IN SELECTED AREAS OF BAY #1

IN THE SERVICE KATER INTAKE STRUCTURE (UNIT #1)

, e PIPING REPLACENENT IN SELECTED AREAS OF #21

COMPONENT COOLING HEAT EXCHANGER BOTH INLET G

OUTLET (UNIT #2)

e PIPING REPLACENENT PHASE I CHILLER CONDENSERS**

(BOTH UNITS)

HOPE CREEK GENERA TING STATION

    • (ENGINEERING)

MONITORING

e CONTINUED SYSTEM PERFORMANCE MONITORING

- ONGOING *IN-LINE* NA TERIAL TEST. PROGRAM

- CONTINUED SYSTEN INSPECTIONS ANO TRENDING

OF RESULTS

  • NOE
  • VISUAL - EXANINATIONS DI.RING PLANNED

SYSTEM OUTAGES

  • PSE&G DESIGN & SYSTEM ENGINEERING PERSONNEL

ARE ACTIVE NENBERS OF THE EPRI

SERVICE KATER KORKING GROUP FOR MATERIALS

AND SYSTEM ENGINEERING

SALPCOVERB

CONFIGURATION BASELINE*

DOCUMENTATION PROJECT

SALEM GENERA TING STATION

HOPE -cREEK GENERA TING STATION

PROJECT MANA GER

M. F. METCALF

AGENDA

  • *

THE BIG PICTURE

PROGRAM OVERVIEW

CBD COST AND SCHEDULE TARGETS

INDUSTRY INVOLVEMENT

CBD RESUL TS AND LESSONS LEARNED

CBD PROJECT EXTENSIONS

SALPJB

THE BIG PICTURE

PSE&G

LICENSING

CONNITNENTS

FSAR &

DESIGN

CHANGES

T. s.

MIC GENERIC

LETTERS,

BULLETINS

& REG GUIDES

6DCs

DESIGN

BASIS

DOCUMENTS

ORAllINGS

SPECIFICATIONS

PURCHASE

ORDERS

CALCULATIONS

DESIGN BASIS - INFORNA TION NHICH IDENTIFIES THE SPECIFIC

FUNCTION TO BE PERFORNEO BY A STRUCTURE,

SYSTEN OR CONPONENT OF A FACILITY, ANO THE

CONTROLLING PARANETERS AS REFERENCE BOUNDS

FOR THE DESIGN.

SALP2B

.,

PROGRAM OVERVIEW

JfHY DO A DESIGN BASIS RECOVERY PROJECT ?

e

ENSURE DESIGN,

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE

ARE CONSISTENT Jf ITH THE DESIGN BASES OF

THE PLANT

-

ESTABLISHMENT OF A CONSOL IDA TED

DESIGN BASIS

-

ACHIEVE HIGHEST POSSIBLE STANDARDS FOR

JOCFR50. 59 EVALUATIONS

-

IMPROVED Al'IARENESS OF REGULA TORY

COMMITMENTS AND DESIGN BASIS REQUIREMENTS

-

REDUCED DOCUMENTATION/INFORMATION SEARCH

AND RETRIEVAL TIME/EFFORTS - INCREASE

PRODUCTIVITY

-

ENSURE CONSISTENT ENGINEERING DA TA AND

ELIMINATE REDUNDANCIES

-

IMPROVED ENGINEERING AWARENESS THROUGH

TRAINING ON USE OF .THE CBD

SALP38

COST AND SCHEDULE TARGETS

PLANT

1988-1989

1990-1991

1992-1993

1994-1996

TOTALS

. I

I

I

I

1 19 BOP SYSTENS 1 13 NSSS SYSTENS 1 14 BOP SYSTENS

I

13 BOP SYSTEMS : 65

1

1

CBDs

I

1 STRUCTURE

2 BOP SYSTENS

1 NISC STRUCTURES I

I

I

I

1$20M

I

I

1 FACILITY

2 STRUCTURES

I .

I

~

I

I

85

1 4 BOP SYSTENS

6 NSSS SYSTENS I 8 NSSS SYSTENS

32 BOP SYSTENS

~

I

CBDs

16 BOP SYSTENS 1 16 BOP SYSTENS

2 STRUCTURES

(..)

~

I

I

1 STRUCTURE

I

$tBM

~

I

SALP48

SALP58

INDUSTRY INVOLVEMENT WITH CBD

PRESENTATION - 11/88 AT INPO

TECHNICAL CONFERENCE

ATTENDED' NSSS AND UTILITY

CONFERENCES

HOSTED .REGION

I UTILITY

CONFERENCE -

JUNE, * 1989

'MEMBER OF NUMARC DESIGN BASIS

ISSUES WORKING GROUP

  • . CBD RESUL TS .AND LESSONS LEARNED

>ALP68

e ,MAGNITUDE OF UNRETRIEVABLE

INFORMATION IS CONSISTENT WITH

OTHER PLANTS OF SAME VINTAGE

  • NO DISCREPANCIES RESULTING IN

REPORTABILITY

  • SIGNIFICANT EFFORT INVOLVED IN DA TA

RETRIEVAL

e OFFSITE INTERVIEJfS

e DEVELOP METHOD FOR-MANAGING CBD

DA TA IN RELATIONSHIP WITH EXISTING

.

.

DATA BASE-SYSTEM

e DEVELOP METHOD FOR MANAGING CBD

SYSTEM DISCREPANCIES

e -DEVELOP SYSTEM FOR CONTROL AND

MAINTENANCE OF CBDs

e DEVELOP A TRAINING PROGRAM TO

PROVIDE SKILLED USE OF CBD

DOCUMENTS

...

-

\\.

I

ALP78

CBD PROJECT EXTENSIONS*

DISCREPANC

MANAGEMENT

DATA

INFORMATION

MANAGEMENT

SYSTEM

RECONSTITUTE

MISSING

INFORMATION

CONFIGURATION

BASELINE

DOCUMENTS

(CBD)

SELECTED

SAFETY

SYSTEM

FUNCTIONAL

REVIEW

'

. '

I

. I

. I

.

I

\\.

'

REFUELING OUTAGE WORKPLAN

HOPE CREEK GENERA TING STATION

GENERAL MANAGER

HOPE.CREEK OPERATIONS

J. J. HAGAN

..

io

HOPE CREEK SECOND REFUELING

OUTAGE ACTIVITIES

  • 22 CRDM REPLACEMENTS
  • UPGRADE RACS/SERVICE WATER PIPING
  • "C-" LOW PRESSURE TURBINE INSPECTION
  • RE-ZERO 18-MONTH

SURVEILLANCE SCHEDULE

. * 4 EMERGENCY DIESEL ENGINE

INSPECTIONS

  • LLRT/ILRT
  • E. 0. AND PREVENTATIVE

MAINTENANCE ITEMS

  • UPGRADE TESTING CAPABILITY OF

CONTROL PANELS (DCPs)

  • CIRCULATING WATER CONTROLS DCP

HOPE CREEK SECOND REFUELING

OUTAGE ACTIVI*TIES

(Continued)

  • 50-DA Y BREAKER TO BREAKER
  • CHANNEL I ZED APPROACH

'

.

  • APPROXIMATELY 5000 TOTAL ACTIVITIES

-COMPARISON 4200 FIRST REFUEL

-COMPARISON 2300 MID CYCLE -

  • CRITICAL PATH

-REFUEL ACTIVITIES

-SERVICE WATER .UPGRADE

-ILRT

  • USE OF MODULAR REPLACEMENT APPROACH

-ROTATING PUMP ASSEMBLIES

-HYDRAULIC SNUBBERS

-MSIV ACTUATORS

.


---

---

GOALS FOR THE

SECOND REFUELING OUTAGE

  • ON LINE IN 50 DAYS OR LESS
  • COMPLETE 90% OF MAJOR OUTAGE DCPs
  • COMPLETE 75% OF MINOR OUTAGE DCPs
  • * REDUCE CONTROL ROOM ALARMS . TD 8

DR LESS,

AT 100% POWER

  • REDUCE T-MODS TO LESS THAN 20
  • COMPLETE 85% OF TOTAL PLANNED

ACT I.VI TIES

  • STAY WITHIN OUTAGE BUDGETS .

- CAPITAL $ 9. JM

- O&M

$12. 2M

GOALS FOR THE

SEC01VD REFUELING OUTAGE

(Continued)

  • INDUSTRIAL SAFETY

- ZERO LOST TIME ACCIDENTS

-OSHA RECORDABLE INCIDENT RA TE <B

-FIRST AID INCIDENT RA TE <6

  • RADIATION EXPOSURE

LESS THAN 185 PERSON/REM

  • RADWASTE GENERA TED

LESS THAN 40 CUBIC METERS

  • PERSONNEL CONTAMINATIONS

LESS THAN 100 OCCURRENCES

  • AVERAGE OVERTIME LESS THAN 38%

REACTOR HEAD

PENETRATION LEAKS

SALEM GENERA TING STATION

SYSTEM ENGINEER

TECHNICAL DEPARTMENT

C.

TIMM -

SALEM UNIT 2

PLANT CONDITION

-

8/7/87, MODE 3

IDENTIFIED FAILURE -

1 THERMOCOUPLE COLUMN

REPAIR METHOD

-

SPLIT CANOPY

SALEM UNIT J

PLANT CONDITION

-

1/7/88, . MODE 3

  • IDENTIFIED FAILURE -

SPARE PENETRATION

REPAIR METHOD

-

WELD OVERLAY OF

SPARE PENETRATIONS (12)

-

1 SPARE PENETRATION SPLIT

CANOPY

SALEM UllIT 2

PLANT CONDITION

-

10/88, REFUELING OUTAGE

IDENTIFIED FAILURE -

SPARE PENETRATION

REPAIR METHOD

-

C-E MECHANICAL SEAL CLAMP

ASSEMBL Y ALL SPARE

PENETRATIONS (4)

ACTIONS TAKEN TO DATE

  • REACTOR HEAD. LEAK DETECTION SYSTEM INSTALLED

ON BOTH UNITS

  • CROM SHROUD DOORS INSTALLED ON BOTH UNITS
  • ALL T/Cs COLUMNS REMOVED ON BOTH UNITS

. OVERLA YEO,

1 SPARE PENETRATION RECEIVED

THE SPLIT CANOPY WELD REPAIR ON UNIT 1

MECHANICAL CLAMPS ON UNIT 2

  • CONTAINMENT INSPECTION PROCEDURE UPGRADE

ACTIONS BEING

EVALUATED

e

ASSESSING PROGRAM TO CHECK TORGUE ON CLAMPS

  • *

EVALUATE PERMANENT REPAIR FOR CLAMPS AND HELD

OVERLAYS

e

EVALUATE CUT AND CAP ALL OF SPARE AND PART

LENGTH CRDMs

'

.

,

STRIVING

. - -FDR

EXCELLENCE,

VICE PRESIDENT - NUCLEAR OPERATIONS

  • S. LaBruna

STRIVING FOR EXCELLENCE

  • MANAGEMENT FOCUS
  • PROCEDURAL PROGRAMS
  • ATTENTION TO DETAIL
  • EFFECTIVE ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS
  • MA TERI AL CONDITION UPGRADE
  • APPROACH TO MAINTENANCE

. MANAGEMENT FOCUS

  • SAFETY CUL TURE

-REACTOR,

RADIOLOGICAL,

INDUSTRIAL

  • PROVIDING HEAL THY SKEPTICISM

-CHALLENGING STANDARDS OF THE PAST

-

- SELF~IDENTIFICATION OF PROBLEMS

  • CLEAR ARTICULATION OF EXPECTATIONS

-DOING THINGS RIGHT THE FIRST .TIME

-PROCEDURE COMPLIANCE

  • INVOLVEMENT AND A !TENTION TO- DETAIL

IN PLANT ACTIVITIES

-DIRECTION,

MONITORING,

ASSESSMENT

AND ACCOUNTABILITY

  • MENTOR APPROACH
  • ORGANIZATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS

.

i

ORGANIZATIONAL

ENHANCEMENTS

  • PRODUC.T/SERVICE MANAGEMENT ANALYSIS

- DETAILED SELF ASSESSMENT

  • REALLOCATION OF RESOURCES

- REFOCUSING RESOURCES TD DEPARTMENT

MISSION (HPES,

PLANNING AND SCHEDULING,.

CHEMISTRY,

EO ANAL YSJS,

RCM PROGRAM)

  • CONTRACTOR CONVERSIONS

,

I

-RECOGNIZING ADDITIONAL LONG-TERM NEEDS

. (MAINTENANCE AND M&TE TECHNICIANS,

INSTRUCTORS,

DBD ANALYSES)

  • PREPARING SALEM FOR THE 1990 'S

- 26 'POSITIONS (OPERA TIDN ENGINEER,

FIELD

SRD'S,

SYSTEM ENGINEERS,

PROCEDURE

WRITERS,

CHEMISTRY,

RADIA TIDN

PROTECTION,

MAINTENANCE SUPERVISORS,

PLANNERS AND G. M. 'S ASSISTANT)

PROCEDURAL PROGRAMS .

  • SALEM UPGRADE PROGRAM
  • HOPE CREEK ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
  • ADMINISTRATIVE PROGRA.M ALIGNMENT

A !TENTION TO DETAIL

  • WORK STANDARDS AND PROCEDURE-USE

HANDBOOK

  • ATTENTION TO DETAIL VIDEO
  • FEEDBACK COMMUNICATIONS
  • TRAINING EFFECTIVENESS
  • DAILY ACCOUNTABILITY

. EFFECTIVE ROOT

CAUSE ANALYSIS

  • USE OF INPO HUMAN PERFORMANCE

EVALUATION SYSTEM (HPES)

  • INDEPENDENT ANAL YSIS
  • TRAINING AT ALL LEVELS

OF MANAGEMENT *

  • FOCUSED AND GLOBAL

CORRECTIVE ACTIONS

  • SIGNIFICANT EVENT RESPONSE TEAM

MA TERI AL CONDITION

UPGRADE

  • SYSTEM ENGINEER EVALUATION
  • SAFETY AND RELIABILITY APPROACH
  • IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE

APPROACH TO MAINTENA!VCE

. **FIRM COMMITMENT TO

RELIABILITY CENTERED MAINTENANCE

  • INCREASE ROLE OF

PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE*

  • PREDICTIVE MAINTENANCE
  • IMPROVED PLANT SAFETY

AND RELIABILITY

PRDCEDURE*UPGRADE PROJEC

SALEM GENERATING STATION

GENERAL MANAGER -

SALEM OPERATIONS

L. K. MILLER

SALEM OPERATIONS*

PROCEDURE UPGRADE PROJEC

. BACKGROUND

  • MANAGEMENT CONCLUSIONS

, * NRC INSPECTION REPORTS

SALEM OPERATIONS

PROCEDURE. UPGRADE PROJEC*

OBJECTIVES.

  • TECHNICALLY UPGRADE DEPARTMENT PROCEDURES

-

OPERATIONS

-

MAINTENANCE MECHANICAL

-

MAINTENANCE ELECTRICAL

-

MAINTENANCE l&C

  • HUMAN FACTORS UPGRADE PROCEDURES

-

REWRITE TD ARTIFICIAL ISLAND

WRITERS GUIDE

  • PROVIDE QUALITY PROCEDURES

-

SUPPORT ADHERENCE TO PROCEDURE POLICY

-

CULTURAL CHANGE EFFORT

SALEM OPERATIONS

PROCEDURE UPGRADE PROJEC

DBJEC TI VES .

(Continued)

ESTABLISH A CONTROL SYSTEM FDR PROCEDURES

-

INSURE PROCEDURES.CAN BE

MAINTAINED CURRENT

. *

PROVIDE PROCEDURES THAT MEET THE

. STANDARDS OF THE 1990 'S

, SALEM OPERATIONS

PROCEDURE UPGRADE PRDJEC

SCOPE

'

  • ESTABLISH A REFERENCE DATA BASE

FOR PROCEDURES

  • PERFORM TECHNICAL REVIEW

OF PROCEDURES

_

  • PERFORM WRITERS GUIDE UPGRADE
  • REVIEW WITH DEPARTMENTS
  • PERFORM INDEPENDENT* REVIEW TO ENSURE

NO SAFETY SIGNIFICANT ISSUES EXIST

  • ESTABLISH PROCEDURE CONTROL SYSTEM

THAT WILL PROVIDE CONFIGURATION

CONTROL OF PROCEDURES

-TRAIN USER

- PROCEDURE DEPLOYMENT

(

SALEM OPERATIONS

PROCEDURE UPGRADE PROJEC

PROJEC/T CONTROLS

  • ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS
  • PROCEDURE CROSS-REFERENCE.

TRACKING SYSTEM

  • PROCEDURE CONTROL SYSTEM
  • PROJECT IND I CA TORS

SALEM OPERA- TIONS

PROCEDURE UPGRADE- PROJEC-

MILESTONES

  • PRIORITIZE DEPARTMENT PROCEDURES

(COMPLETE)

  • ESTABLISH FACILITY FDR PROJECT PERSONNEL

(COMPLETE)

'

  • SECURE STAFFING TD SUPPORT PROJECT

(9/89)

  • TRAIN PROCEDURE WRITERS ON WRITERS GUIDE

(9/89)

  • ESTABLISH AND TRAIN INDEPENDENT REVIEW

GROUP (9/89) *

  • DEVELOP ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS FOR

PROJECT CONTROLS (IN PROGRESS)

SALEM OPERATIONS

PROCEDURE UPGRADE PROJEC

PROJECT SCHEDULE

  • 100% COMPLETED BY 12/91

-

TECHNICAL SPECIFICA TIDN

SURVEILLANCE

  • IMPROVEMENT. PROJECT
  • SALEM 'GENERATING STATION

GENERAL MANAGER -- SALEM OPERATIONS

L. K. MILLER

-SALEM OPERATIONS

TECH SPEC SURVEILLANCE

IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

_BACKGROUND

  • EARLY 1987

.

.

.

MMIS RECURRING TASKS INITIATED FOR

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION SURVEILLANCE

REQUIREMENTS

  • 1/87 THRU 8/88

THIRTEEN (13) MISSED SURVEILLANCES

  • 9/88

GENERAL MANAGER ASSIGNS

TECHNICAL MANAGER TO DEVELOP

CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAM

SALEM OPERATIONS

TECH SPEC SURVEILLANCE

IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

OVERALL OBJECTIVE

  • ELIMINATE OCCURRENCES OF MISSED

TECH SPEC SURVEILLANCES

i

i

~' . * . i.1

SALE/vi OPERA TIDNS

" i'

TECH SPEC SURVEILLANCE **:J

'

1

IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ,,.1:1)i.

SPECIFIC OBLIECTIVES

  • . VALIDA TE MMIS DA TA BASE
  • DEVELOP AND MAINTAIN AN OVERDUE

REPORTING SYSTEM USING M/v!IS

  • DEVELOP METHODS FOR MANAGING

STAGGERED SURVEILLANCES

  • DEVELOP METHODS TO REDUCE RtLIANCE

ON MANUAL FILES

TRAIN PERSONNEL IN NEW ME.THDDS

(

f

!

!

i

l

' t

SALEM OPERATIONS

'

.

TECH* SPEC SURVEILLANCE

IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

PROJECT PLAN

  • REVIEW ALL TECH SPEC *

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS

  • ESTABLISH A TECH SPEC ADMINISTRATOR
  • ESTABLISH SECURITY ON ALL

.MMIS RECURRING TASKS

  • DEVELOP TECH SPEC SURVEILLANCE

REPORT COVERING ALL

STATION DEPARTMENTS

  • DEVELOP A FOURTEEN DAY LOOK AHEAD

TECH SPEC SURVEILLANCE REPORT

FOR' EACH DEPARTMENT THAT PRINTS

AUTOMATICALLY EACH DAY

  • ESTABLISH DEPARTMENT CODRDINA TOR

--~----

- - - - - - -

SALEM OPERATIONS

TECH SPEC SURVtILLANCE

IMPROVtMtNT PROJtCT

RtSU/ TS ACHIEVtD

  • OVERALL PROGRAM OBJECTIVE MET
  • SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES COMPLETE .

ALJDI T IONAL ACT IO/VS PLA1Vi\\1t:L~;

  • TECH SPEC AMENDMENT PROCESSING

e REVIEN OF SURVEILLANCES SCHEDULED

  • * AT LESS THAN 7-DA Y INTERVALS
  • CONDITIONAL SURVEILLANCES

PSE&G

THE ENERGY PEOPLE

  • Reliability Centered

Pre.venti ve* Maintenance

Program

  • sALEM

GENERATING STATION

.

.

RCM OBJECT I VE *

FOCUS RESOURCES WHERE THEY .

CAN BE MOST EFFECTIVE IN

. IMPROVING PLANT SAFETY

AND AVAILABILITY

-RCM IS A PROACTIVE PROCcSS FOR

IMPROVING PLANT SAFETY ANL7

-

AVAILABILITY O!VE SYSTcM AT

A* TIME

e USES ACTUAL FAILURE DA TA

  • USES RELIABILITY MODEL AND

PRA RESULTS

  • USES EQUIPMENT EXPERTS
  • IDENTIFIES s*YSTEM FUNCTION AND

FUNCTIONAL FAILURES

  • ANALYZES EQUIPMENT FAILURE MODES

THAT CAUSE SYSTEM FAILURES

  • DETERMINES CAUSES OF EQUIPMENT.

FAILURES

  • CHOOSES METHODS TO PREDICT OR

PREVENT EQUIPMENT FAILURE

  • PRODUCES MAINTENANCE TASKS OR

IDENTIFIES CHANGES TO INCREASE

SAFETY- AND AVAILABILITY

EXISTING PJ\\l PI{OGRLL\\~if 'rs I~C~I

EXISTING P11 PROGR1\\.1I

RC11

BASIS

e VENDOR RECOMMENDATION

e CONSERVATIVE TECHNICAL

JUDGEMENT

OUTPUT

e PREVENTIVE TASKS

BASIS

e SPECIFIC EGUIPMENT

FUNCTION AND APPLICATION *

e FAILURE RA TES AND

MEAN TIME TO REPAIR

e EFFECTS AND PROBABILITY

OF MUL TIPLE EGUIPMENT

FAILURES ON SYSTEM

FUNCTION

OUTPUT

e PREDICTIVE TASKS

e PLANNED TASKS

e PREVENTIVE TASKS

EVENT

INCEPTION

B6 B7

)(YYYX

X'XI

XXX'Yllll YYJ

ICxxXXICX)d

YYVXJIXXl

)( v v._v v

Y

1111

BB 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97

1---------------------.i..---------------t--------t-------- ------- ------- ------- ___ ..;.. ___ ------- -------- --------1--------

DESIGN

1---------------------.i..------- ________ .._ _______ ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ----------------1--------

PILOT

XXXXx

il'XllX'X

lf V Y"V Y

ICXXXX)

1-----------'-----------..,_ _______________ ..,. _______ ._ _______ ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ----------------

FULL PROJECT

JI

... "

... ...

JI

...

JI JI

IMPLEMENTATION

1---------------------.i. ------- ________ .._ _______ ..., _______ ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------- -------- --------

EFFECTIVENESS

..