ML18093A789
| ML18093A789 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem, Hope Creek, 05000000 |
| Issue date: | 04/07/1988 |
| From: | Wenzinger E NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | Miltenberger S Public Service Enterprise Group |
| References | |
| IEB-85-003, IEB-85-3, NUDOCS 8804130040 | |
| Download: ML18093A789 (7) | |
Text
...
Docket Nos. 50-272 50-311 50-354 Public Service Electric & Gas Comp~ny ATTN:
Mr. Steven E. Miltenberger Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer Post Office Box 236 Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey 08038 Gentlemen:
.e 01 APR 1ssa
Subject:
Motor-Operated Valve (MOV) Switch Settings, IE Bulletin (IEB) 85-03--
Request for Additional Information Based on our review of your responses, dated May 27, 1986 to the subject Bulletin, NRC staff has determined that additional information is needed to allow NRC to complete its review of your IEB 85-03 program.
Accordingly, please submit the information requested in enclosure 1 and 2 for Hope Creek and Salem, respectively within thirty days.
In submitting your response, please use your normal pro-cedures for correspondence to NRC, but also add*Mr. R. J. Kiessel, (NRC:NRR Generic Communication Branch, Washington, D.C.
20555) to the distribution.
Your cooperation is appreciated.
Sincerely, E. C. Wenzinger, Chief Projects Branch No. 2 Division of Reactor Projects
Enclosure:
Request for Additional Information, Salem and Hope Creek cc w/encl:
- S. LaBruna, General Manager, Hope Creek Operations W. H. Hirst, Manager, Joint Generation Projects Department, Atlantic Electric Company L. A. Reiter, General Manager - Licensing and Reliability, Hope Creek J. Zupko, Jr., General Manager, Salem Operations B. Preston, Manager, Licensing and Regulation, Salem Rebecca A. Green, Bureau of Radiation Protection Public Document Room (PDR)
Local Public Document Room (LPDR)
Nuclear Safety Information Center (NSIC)
NRC Resident Inspectors, Salem and Hope Creek State of New Jersey
. -8804130040 880407 PDR ADOCK 05(>00272 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY IEB 85 0001.0.0 04/07/88 Q
~[01 y
'\\ \\
Public Service Electric and Gas Company bee w/encl:
Region I Docket Room (with concurrences)
Management Assistant, DRMA (w/o encl)
DRP Section Chief Robert J. Bores, DRSS R. Kiessel, NRR/OGCB (w/o encl.)
2 G. Rivenbark, NRR, Project Manager (w/o encl.)
D. Fischer, NRR, Project Manager (w/o encl.)
RI:DRP Kel 1 ey/rhl 4/ 6 /88 Swetland 4/) /88 Qnoo)
¥J?9er 4/1 /88 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY 07 APR 19&8 IEB 85 0001.1.0 04/06/88
. J
ige 1 of 1 FEB 2 3 1988 REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (RA!) RE:
Review of Responses to Action Item e of IE Bulletin 85-03 Licensee:
Public Service Electric and Gas Co.
Po O. Box 236 Hancocks Bridge, N. J. 08038 Unit(s): Salem 1,2 Date of Response: 05-27-86 Respondent~
Corbin A. McNeil!, Jr.,
Vice President-Nuclear The inf ormati~n provided in your response to Action Item e of IE Bulletin 85-03 was found to be deficient in some areas.
Provide the additional information necessary to resolve the following comments and questions:
- 1. Has water hammer due to valve closure been considered in the determination of pressure differentials? If not, explaine
- 2. If MOVATS is planned for application to some MOVs which are not included in its data base, commit to and describe an alt~rnate method for determining the extra thrust necessary to overcome pressure differentials for these valves.
- 3. MOVs 1SJ30, 11SJ33, 12SJ33, 1SJ67, 1SJ68, 11SJ134, 12SJ134 9 and 1SJ135 of the HPSI System are.not listed in the response of 05-27-86.
However, similar suction, miniflow and discharge valves 8806A, 8923A, 8923B, 8814A, 8814B~ 8821A, 8821B, and 8835 are identified on Page 25 of the WOG Report of March 1986.
Revise the response of 05-27-86 to include these MOVs 9 or justify their exclusion.
As required by Action. Item a of the bulletin, assume inadvertent equipment operations.
Note: Similarly located valves are used for Unit 2 also.
- 4. Revise Page 2 of Attachment 1 of the response dated 05-27-86 to include values of differential pressure for both opening and closing the MOVs, as required by Action Item a of the bulletin.
- 5. The proposed program for action items b, c and d of the bulletin is incompletee Provide the following details as a minimum:
(a) commitment to a training program for setting switches, maintaining valve operators, using sjgnature testing equipment and interpreting signatures, and (b) consideration of pipe break conditions as required by the bulletin.
MAR 4 1988 REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (RA!) RE:
Review of Responses to Action Item e of IE Bulletin 85-03 Licensee:
Unit(s): Hope Creek 1 Public Service Electric and Gas Co.
P., 0 B Box 236 Date of Response: 05-27-86 Hancocks Bridge, NJ 08038 Respondent~
Corbin A. McNeill, Jr.,
Vice President Nuclear The information provided in your response to Action Item e of IE Bulletin 85-03 was found to ~e deficient in some areaso Provide the additional information necessary to resolve the following comments and questions:
la If MOVATS is planned for application to some MOVs which are not included in its data base, commit to and describe an alternate method for determining the extra thrust necessary to overcome pressure differentials for these valves.
- 2. Revise Table 1 of the response dated 05-27-86 to include the following MOVs, or j~stify *their exclusion.
As required by Action Item a of the bulletin, assume inadvertent equipment operations.
(a) HPCI MOV V005 is shown normally open in Zone E-3 of Drawing M-55-1 Revision 20, and as MOV 3 on Page 68 of the BWROG Report NEDC-31322 dated September 1986.
How would suction from the CST be ensured if this MOV were to be (a) actuated inadvertently to the closed position upon intended initiation of the system or (b) left closed inadvertently?
(b) RCIC MOV VOOl is shown normally open in Zone F-3 of Drawing M-49-1 Revision 14, and as MOV 3 ~n Page 72 of the BWROG Report.
The question in Item 2(a) above applies here also.
(c)
(d)
HPCI MOV FD-V006 is shown ~ormally open ~n Zone C-7 of Drawing M-55-1 Revision 20, and as MOV VI on Page 71 of the BWROG Report.
How would steam exhaust from the HPCI Turbine to the.suppression pool be ensured if this HOV were to be (a) actuated inadvertently to the closed position upon intended initiation of the system or (b) left closed inadvertently?
RCIC MOV FC-V005 is shown normally open in Zone C-6 of Drawing M-49-1 Revision 14, and as MOV VI on Page 74 of the BWR09 Report.
The question in Item 2(c) above also applies to exhaust from the RCIC Turbine.
MAR 4 1988 Page Apf 3 RAI f'1P'Hope Creek 1 (e) RCIC MOV V022 is shown normally op~n in Zone E-3 of Drawing M~50-1 Revision 16~ and as MOV I on Page 74 of the BWROG Report.
How would steam supply to the RCIC Turbine be ensured if this MOV were to*be operated inadvertently as described in Item 2(a) above?
- 3. Revise Table 1 of the response dated 05-27-86 to include the following MOVs, or justify their exclusion.
Note that they have safety actions for both opening and closing.
(a) HPCI MOV V009 is shown normally closed in Zone A-7 of Drawing M-55-1 Revision 20, and as MOV 4 on Page 68 of the BWROG Report.
Both opening and closing are safety actions, per Page 55.
(b) RCIC MOV V003 is shown normally closed in Zone B-7 of Drawing M-49-1 Revision 14, and as MOV 4 on Page 72 of the BWROG Reporte Both opening and closing are safety actions, per Page 59..
(c) HPC! MOV BJ-V028 is shown normally closed in Zone C-5 of Drawing M-56-1 Revision 13, and as MOV 9 on Page 68 of the BWROG Report.
Both opening and closing are safety actionsp per Page 56 and note (f) on Page 66.
(d) RCIC MOV BD-V022 is shown normally closed in Zone D-6 of Drawing M-50-1 Revision 16, and a~ MOV 9 on Page 72 of the BWROG Report.
Both opening and closing are safety actions, per Page 60 and note (f) on Page 66.
- 4. Revise Table 1 of the response dated 05-25-86 to include the following MOVs, or justify their exclusion.
Note that each has a safety action for either opening or closing.
(a) RCIC HOV FC-VOll is shown normally open in Zone B-6 of Drawing M-49-1 Revision 14, and as MOV 7 on Page 72 of the BWROG Report.
Per Page 59, opening is a safety action.
(b) HPCI HOV FD-VOS! is shown normally closed in Zone F-6 of Drawing M-55-1 Revision 20, and as MOV IV on Page 71 of the BWROG Report.
Per Page 57, closing is a safety action.
(c) HPCI MOVs FD-V007 and FD-VOlO are shown normally open in zones C-7 and C-8 of Drawing M-56-1 Revision 13, and as MOVs VII and VIII on Page 70 of the BWROG Report.
Per Page 58, closing is a safety action.
(d) RCIC MOVs FC-V006 ~nd FC-V007 are shown normally open in zones C-7 and C-8 of Drawing M-49-1 Revision 14, and as MOVs VII and VIII on Page 74 of the BWROG Report.
Per Page 62, closing is a safety action.
MAR 4 1988.
Page A>f 3 RAI f111'Hope Creek 1
- 5. Revise Table 1 of the response dated 05-27-86 to include the following MOVs, or justify their exclusion.
According to pages 55 and 60 of the BWROG Report (for HPCI and RCIC respectively) 9 these valves have no safety action; however, utilities are expected to report differential pressures for testing, per Note o on Page 66.
(a) HPCI MOVs VOlO and V004 are shown normally closed in zones E-5 and F~5 of Drawing M-55-1 Revision 20 9 and as MOVs 5 and 6 on Page 68 of the BWROG Report.
(b) RCIC HOV V012 is shown normally closed in Zone E-5 of Drawing M-49-1 Revision 14, and as MOV 5 on Page 72 of the BWROG Report.
6c The proposed program for action items b, c and d of the bulletin is incomplete.
Provide the following details as a
- minimum~
(a) commitment to a training program for setting switches, maintaining valve operators, using signature testing equipment and interpreting signatures, (b) description of a method possibly needed to extrapolate valve stem thrust determined by testing at less than maximum differential pressure, and (c) consideration of pipe break conditions as required by the bulletino
I.
1 of 1 FEB 2 3 1988 REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (RA!)_ RE:
Review of Responses to Action Item e of IE Bulletin 85-03 Licensee:
Public Service Electric and Gas Co.
Pe O. Box 236 Hancocks Bridge, N. J. 08038 Unit(s): Salem 1,2 Date of Response: 05-27-86 Respondent:
Corbin Ao McNeil!, Jr.,
Vice President-Nuclear The information provided in your response to Action Item e of IE Bulletin 85-03 was found to be deficient in some arease Provide the additional information necessary to resolve the following comments and questions:
le Has water hammer due to valve closure been considered in the determination of pressure differentials? If not, explain.
- 2. If MOVATS is planned for application to some MOVs which are not included in its data )ase, commit t~ and describe an alternate method for determining the extra thrust necessary to overcome pressure differentials for these valves.
- 3. MOVs ISJ30, 11SJ33, 12SJ33, 1SJ67, 1SJ68, 11SJ134, 12SJ134, and 1SJ135 of the HPSI System are.not listed in the response of 05-27-86.
However, similar suction, miniflow and discharge valve~ 8806A, 8923A, 8923B, 8814A, 8814B, 8821A, 8821B, and 8835 are identified on Page 25 of the WOG Report of March 1986.
Revise the response of 05-27-86 to include these MOVs, or justify their exclusion.
As required by Action Item a.of the bulletin, assume inadvertent equipment operations.
Note: Similarly located valves are used for Unit 2 also.
4o Revise Page 2 of Attachment 1 of the response dated 05-27-86 to include values of differential pressure for both opening and closing the MOVs, as required by Action Item a of the bulletin.
Se The proposed program for action items b, c and d of the bulletin is incomplete.
Provide the following details as a minimum:
(a) commitment to.a training program for setting switches,
~aintaining valve operators, using signature testing equipment and interpreting signatures, and (b) consideration of pipe break conditions as required by the bulletin.
0