ML18092A260
| ML18092A260 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem  |
| Issue date: | 08/20/1984 |
| From: | Miller W NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM) |
| To: | Uderitz R Public Service Enterprise Group |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8408280330 | |
| Download: ML18092A260 (2) | |
Text
- r Docket Nos. 50-272 and 50-311 AUG 201884 Pubiic Service Electric and Gas Company ATTN:
Mr. R. A. Uderitz Vice President - Nuclear
.Post Office Box 236 Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey 08038 Gentlemen:
DISTRIBUTION:
PDR LPDR
~Regulatory Docket File (.016)
~. D. Fischer, ORB-1 C. Parrish, ORB-1 R. Diggs, LFMB LFMB Pending Check File LFMB Reactor File LFMB R/F We have received a copy of the following applications which were filed with the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (ONRR) for review for the Salem Nuclear Generating Station:
- 1.
A February 9, 1979 application, as revised March 10, 1980 and April 29, 1981, which.transmitted your inservice testing program and requested relief from certain testing requirements pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55a(g) for Unit No. 1. Fees pursuant to 10 CFR 170.22 of the March 23, 1978 regulations were not remitted with this request.
- 2.
An August 10~ 1981 application for Technical Specifications relating to (a) process and effluent monitors, (b) mechanical and hydraulic snubbers, and (c) rod position indicator for Unit Nos. 1 and 2. A Class IV fee ($12,300) was remitted with your request pursuant to 10 CFR 170.22 of the March 23, 1978 regulations.
Based on information provided by the ONRR staff as the result of their final reviews of your requests~ it has been determined that:
- 1.
A Class III fee {$4,000) is appropriate for Item 1 since the review involved consideration of a single safety issue. This application was approved by letter and Safety Evaluation dated April 12, 1983.
- 2.
Two Class III fees ($8,000) and two Class I fees ($800) are appropriate for (a) and (b) of Item 2 since the review involved consideration of two single safety issues and a duplicate unit fee for each issue. There-fore, a refund of $3:-;500 is appropriate for this application. This ap-plication was approved by Amendment Nos. 40 and 5 on February 2," 1982 and Amendment Nos. 48 and 13 on October 18~ 1982.
8408280330 840820 PDR ADDCK 05000272 P
2 -
- ~UG 2 o 100-t Public Service i::: *.;ctric and Gas Company --
lliHl'I Item 2(c} of your August 10 application was withdrawn by letter dated November 14, 1983. Under the* provisions of 10 CFR l70.12(a}, the USNRC may retain fees regardless of the disposition of an application. - How-ever, for applications filed prior to June 20, 1984, it is NRC policy not to retain fees if no review had connnenced prior to withdrawal of a particular application.
On this basis, it has been determined that an exemption, pursuant to 10 CFR 170.ll(b}, from the fee requirements is authorized by law and such exemption is otherwise in the public interest and is hereby granted for Item 2(c) of your August 10 application.
Since in one instance $4,000 is due th~ USNRC and in the other $3,500 is due.
your Company, we are applying the $3,500 refund due your Company for Item 2 to the $4,000 due the USNRC for Item l. It is requested that you remit the additional sum of $500 to this office to complete the fee due for your Febru-ary 9!1 1979 application.
We hope this transaction is acceptable to your Company.
For your information, a brief discussion of fees for applications for license amendments filed before and after June 20, 1984!) is contained in Enclosure 1 to this letter. If there are questions on fees, call us on 301-492-7225.
Enclosure:
Fee Assessment Information Is:~~~::~ L ~~~~~:~~~. ~~*
i 1
DATE~ * ~(. ~ 1. (~~. * ~( 11 * *
(?~.
Sincerely,
~gniea c. James~~
~
William 0. Miller, Chief License Fee Management Branch Office of Administration
........................ :..
- I NRC FORM 318 (10-80) NRCM 0240 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY