ML18089A252

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Discusses Proposed Augmented Insp Plan for Monitoring & Evaluating Util Performance Improvement Program Over Next 2 Yrs
ML18089A252
Person / Time
Site: Salem  PSEG icon.png
Issue date: 06/23/1983
From: Starostecki R
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To: Harold Denton, Deyoung R, Murley T
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I), NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE), Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML18089A251 List:
References
NUDOCS 8307270464
Download: ML18089A252 (7)


Text

UNITEL 3TATES Ne.EAR REGULATORY COMMISSIOe REGION I 631 PARK AVENUE KING.OF PRUSSIA; PENNSYLVANIA 19406 JUN: 2. 2 1983 MEMORANDUM FOR: JH. Denton*,. Di rector,_ Office. of Nuc.l ear Reactor Regula ti on FROM:

SUBJECT:

R. CM DeYoung, Director, Office of Inspection and Eriforcement T. Murley*, RegionaJ Administrator, Region* I R. W.. Starosteck.i,. Oirector,. Division of Project. and Resident Programs SALEM:. AUGMENTED INSPECTION: PROGRAM; -

PROPOSED Consistent with* estab:lished:po.li.cy', Regfon'. I has the responsibility for followup of the. SaJemATWS event This is based on.prior* discussions and agreements between. NRR, IE, and the, Region.* ln accordance with this; responsibility we have. developed an' augmented i-nspectiori program.

This. memorandum. and: the attached* table p.rovfde* our* proposed p*lan for monitoring and* evaJ uat.ing. the PSE&G* performance* improvement p.rogram at Sa.l em over the next one to two* years.

These: effo,rts-primarily consist of inspection activities, but i nc.l ude management: involvement in

  • periodic meet.i ng s with the Ti cen see.

The management* meetings.,. whfch are: in addition* to the Basic Inspection Program, consi.st of: frequent meetings w-fth* PSE&G; management. by various levels of* NRC

  • staff anct manag_ers. to a:ssess;. the* licensee's;. progress towards. complet.ion of commitments:,. and. inspections to;. verify the adequacy and effectiveness of the.

l icenseer*s ac.tfons.

A Region: I. sect.ion chief is charged: with the re.sponsibi 1-fty for* overview.of these activities w,ith responsibirit.ies fo.r individual items assigned as noted in the attachment.. This.li'effort* will involve* the. active part.ici:patfon of the~ Regjona.l Administrator,. myself, branch chief, NRR project.

manager, and section chief, as well a~ the resident inspectors and project engineer.

Plea.se note that the plan* relies almost exclusively on Region I resources.

I be 1 ieve that the deve-1 opment of the PSE&G. Action Pl an, in* response to the MAC report (Item* C.9.T &: C.10.b on attached* table), may focus on several other ar.eas that may warrant. further IE and NRR participation.

Accordingly, these acti.ons will be closely; monitored by the Region and, as necessary, additional_

. NRR/IE assistance wi Tl be* requested*.

A team inspection will be. conducted in September 1983 which will concentrate on the T; censee 1 s maintenance and procurement program*.

The team concept takes advantage of perceptions of Salem management by other NRC personnel involved in reviews of licensee* activities.

For example, NRR personnel are involved in onsite review of the licensee's. verification of operability of safety related systems for Unit 1 and will ba involved in a review-of Unit 2 short term actions.

I also have* arranged with C. Thayer, Director, NRTC, to use a RTC instructor for a two-week period at Salem.

Additionally, IE'. has agreed to tentatively schedule a Performance Apprafsal Team (PAT) inspection 9 - 12 months from now.

--9307270464 830720 PDR ADOCK 05000272 G

PDR

'f H :-oenton 1R. C. De Young

r. Murley:

After approximately one year,. I intend: to reeva Tuate the need for an augmented inspection program. and recommend termination* or modification, as appropriate,.

based on: SALP: results and *plant: performance'.

Completion of the augmented program*. wfll be~ documented; in-a memorandum from: the Regional Adminis.trator to the EDO..

Spec.ific. individual activ.fties. w.i.ll be: documented in regular inspec.--

tion: and' meeting reports,.* It is*. expected:,. however*;. that senior level manage~

ment meetings will conti n*ue" -for* approximately one* more year on. a. reduced:

frequency* basis... Accordingly,, thts: proposed* plan:- is:- subject to revi'sion and w-i ll incorporate* cons.tructive* improvements as they become evident..

Jhi's augmented:. program. will reJy* on* more* effective* use* of existing resources.,

iand we: wiTl no.t budget for more. resources-.

Some* benefits wi Tl accrue due* to.

the: assJg_nment o.f a. new-Senior* Resident Inspector fn. that we. wi 11 have three:

rest-dents, ons,i te.. during._ frequent perio er the next three. months...

Richard' W; *.

  • Starosteckci:,. Di rector
    • . Oivi s.foo: of Project and Resident:

Programs,:

  • Enclosure*:*

s*aTenr Augmented: Enspectlon.PTa*n cc w/ enc T :-_

E *. Case * -

J.. ATTan J ~- Taylo.r.

  • H _ Thompson*

E. Jordan*

D.

  • Ei sen,hut-.

T. Marti:n-'.

E. Greenman:

S*. Va,rga L. Nor*rho lm*

J. Linv.ille*

R. Jacobs R. Summers-

0. Fischer*

R. Keimi 9:.

H. Kister*

Chief, RPS*, 1D

lteni No, C.9.1* &

c.10.b SALEM AUGMENTED INSPEctioN PLAN Action Licensee Responsibility Commitment Overview and maintain cognizance of roilowlng

  • act Ions:

Pst*o - Region I management meetings to review overall 1 lcensee corrective act Ion program progress and status Review MAC management diagnostic report.

Review PSE&o proposed

  • actJoH plan for lmpJe.;..

mehtlhg MAC recommenda-tions lhtiludlhg progress In carrying otit adtlciri ~Ian Tasked Sect ion C.hlef (SC) bi>RP biv, DI r.

DPRP blv. bi r, bPRf> blv,* bl t.

.*.-----:-~

Review rst&c proposed* _...-OPRP biv. bir.

  • action *p1~11.for linpJe.;.....--

mentlng BETA rectimmenda*

tlons lncludltig progress. lrl c~rrYlnd out actldh Jl~n i

  • e/83 tao rit-st inspection (I) 2

. Meet I hg (Ml F regL.iency 6/S3 ( Mj 5/83 ( ~)

(draft)

.* 8/83 (M; BI nitrnth I y As needed, Uht Ii approval of.

i>SE&G plan

, \\

see reiiia rks see reiila rks Rema'rks Project completion, 6/85; meetings to be conducted at site; regional office and corporate office on rotat-

!ng basis.

Regional Administrator to nion1tor progress through partl-A clpatlon.

Meeting with PSE&G to dis-cuss diagnostic report; assistance from IE, NRR; follow-up with review of f Ina i report.

Follow-up meetings to be held with PSE&G, request IE & NRR participation; NRC approval of plant to be documented lh a letter to PSE&G trom RA; meetings and/or fhspections wl I I be scheduled to review progress of lmpiementa-tlon of.action plan; Fol low-Up meetihgs to be held with PSE&G, request JE & NRR ~artlclpation; NRG approval of plant to be documented In a letter to PSE&G from RA; meetings and/or Inspections will be scheduled to review

~rbgress of Implementa-tion of action plan;

Item No.

c.9.1 c, 10.a C;9.3 c.9.4 C.9.5 0

..)

Action Review progress In

~tafflng of NUclear AssUranbe ahd Re~ula t I on Depa rttiierit overview MAc a~sess*

ment of QA department Including lmpleinenta-tloh of any changes overview Nuclear.ova~~

sight Committee (NOC)

Activities Including Quarterly Reports overview tra lriing program developed tor tlrst-level super*

visors and lmplemen*

tat Ion thereof overview training program developed for senior sUper~.

vlsory_level person*

nei and lffiple~ehtfi~

t 1 oil the reot.

ove rv i e'ti program...

developed ror,periodic or regular.tralhlh~

for supervl sory and management personnel Resoonslbl 1 lt:Y DPRP Branch Chlet (BC)

OPRP BC DPRP sc oi>Rf> SC &. Project Erig I hee r ( PE, SC anet PE tee>

li celisee Commitment 2

First Inspection (I)

Meeting (M) 9/83 (M)

' i 7/83 7/83 or 8/83 (MJ

.1 9/83.

I ' 1 Spring 84.

7/83 (M)

.. 9/83 ~M) 10/83 (I)

~/83 (M)

.10/83 ( I )

Sprihg '84 2

F regliency Monthly Monthiy; document stai;us to NRR & DPRP Div. DI r.

at 6 inos.

Ql.iih'tt! r 1 y Monthly

meetlhg, fol low-up lnspectlori as heeded same as above tao Remarks Discuss, with PSE&G, statflng effecliveness, department charter, capabl I I ties and task-ing, etc.

conduct follow-up Inspections as necessary to verify QA department etfectlveness Discuss NOC recommenda-tions, PSE&G plan for Implementing recom-mendations, areas examined by NOC, NOC effectiveness, etc.

Include results for dl~cUsslbn In Item c-9 Discuss content of proposed training, effectiveness of tra In Ing; progress towards completion.

Inspect lesson plans, tr~lnlng records, ~nd at tend tra In I rig sessions

Item No.

C.9.6 C;2.b.i C.7.b.1 C.8.a.1 3

Action

- Licensee ResponslbllltY Commltmeht overview technlcai training program developed for non~

station personnel*

Special lnspectlon(s) of maintenance and procurement to Include the followlhg supple-mental Modules:

38701 j Procure-ment Control Program (in6rease sample sl.ze In section 2 by factor of four) b) 38702 Receipt; Storage; and Hand I Ing of Equip-ment Program (doubie sample size In sect Ion 2) c) 62700, Maintenance Routine (or.other Inspection plan to be developed by EPB)

TBD Engineering Programs. Branch

( EPB), R i Review modified procure~

t~B ment procedures Review additional EPB training on processing work orders to emphasize test/retest requirements Determine If AP-9 arid Residents (RRls) other, procedures have

  • have been approp~lately revised to. Include post maintenance test-ing 1

sprl ng '84 N/A 7/83 9/83 7/83 ti rst. Inspection (I) 2 Meeting (Ml Frequency Sprl ng i 84 TBD 9/83 ( i )

Once 9)63 ( I)

Once once 7 /83 ( I I once Remarks Team Inspection to Include RRls, Project Manager, and EPB Team Inspection Team Inspection Fol low-up Inspections If necessary

c.8.a.2

.j c.8.~-.3*

c.8.a.4 C.1.b,1 C.6,b

  • Unit 2 c,Lii.1 LI cetlsee Action ResporisibllltY commitment Fl rst Inspection (I) 2

~eetfnq (M>

Frequency Remar~s Review licensee's Residents 1/84 Incorporation of or PE 1/B4 (I)

Once Foilow-up Inspections If necessary necessary chahges to departmental documents due to vendor arid engineering recoffimenda*

tiohs ~oricerhlhg ~ost~

malntenatlce operablllty testing

  • beteriiilne. it preventive RRls maintenance recommends*.*

t 1c;ns have been

  • Incorporated lhtti Inspection order.

sys tent Monitor pro~ress in.*

~ompletlori of.

Managed Maintenance.

Program Inspect rev 1 selJ Uii It 1

  • MEL for compieteness and accuracy RR is Review and monitor

~t licensee lorig*term actions lri*~pdatlhg of venddr supplied IHrdfma~

  • tloh short Term Actions Review licensee process

?t ro r ve r I f I cat 1 on Of' Unit 2 MEL complete*

ness and accuracy for key systems 8/8l 1/84 5/83

. f1U I t I phti sed.

between 6/83 * *

. '" 12/83 8/83 ( 1) 10/83 (1;

  • ~i8l

~rlbr tti Urilt

  • ~rlcir to uhlt 2

.~ reitart re~t~~t BHricihth IY Blmonthly once rwlce once Witness preventive.main-tenance on selected components, review PM procedures for adequacy arid basis for periodi-city, etc..

Examine progress -

towards comple-tion, review program lmplemeritatlon for effectiveness and utll fzatlon, etc.

Addt~iohal lnspectlon 12/83 or 1/84 Si in I I a r to t.in I t 1 fol low-Li~

I I

Item Nci, c.2.a D

Action Review PSE&G sampling review or past.proture~

. ment documents (slml lat to Unit 1 foilow*up)

Review PSE&o evaiUatioH or Unlt.2 work ofder classlflcatlon. (since

. Issuance of MEL) ahd dlsposl*tlori ot Improperly blas~lrled WO's Review iicensee deter~

mlnatlbn ot system,ahd comporient.operabll ltY rot Unit 2 Resbonsll:il i ltY

.RR is RR is & PE itllig Licensee ti rst Inspection commitment Meeting IM)

Prior to Unit i>rlo~ to Unit 2 2 res ta rt i-est:a rt

  • Prior to Unit Prior to linlt 2 2 res ta rt restart Pi-lot-to Unit

~rlor tr; Uri it 2 2 restart reHart NOTES:

1.

~etJ~cts. 11ceniii cofu~lt~erit f6~ prdgr~ffi di~elftpffiirif 6~1~~ 4m~leieritatibri td rol16w

( I) Frequency once once once

2.

Meeting br Inspection tretjLien~f futi~ be ~6d1t1ed ~Ith Dl~lsltih Dlreb~dr, approval....

3.

Item numbers are trom licensees bofrectlvij abtlori ~ldn submitted to the NRG ori Apr!I 2aj ~~~ii Ch

~;

2

{

Remarks Similar to Unit fol low-up Similar to Unit 1 fo 11 ow-up siinl iar to Unit i ft> i iow-up