ML18087A679
| ML18087A679 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem  |
| Issue date: | 02/18/1983 |
| From: | Miller W NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM) |
| To: | Uderitz R, Uneritz R Public Service Enterprise Group |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8302250024 | |
| Download: ML18087A679 (2) | |
Text
..
~
Docket Nos. 50-272 and 50-311 FEB
~ 8 1983 Public Service Electric and Gas Company ATTN:
Mr. Richard A. Uderitz.
Vice President - Nuclear Post Office Box 236 Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey 08038 Gentlemen:
We have received copies of the following applications which were filed with the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (ONRR) for review:
- 1.
A June 22, 1982 (LCR-82-03) application for Technical Specification changes related to protection of fire barrier penetrations for the Salem Nuclear Generating Station Unit No. 1. A Class III fee ($4,000) was remitted pursuant to 10 CFR 170.22~
- 2.
An October 7~ 1982 application for Technical Specification changes related to (a) deferral of pressurizer surveillance for Salem Unit No. 1, (b) deferral of pressurizer drop test for Salem Unit No. 2, (c} steam generator inspection ports for Salem Unit No. 2, and {d) inservice inspection of snubbers for Salem Unit No. 2. A Class IV fee ($12,300) was remitted with your application.
Based on information provided by the ONRR staff as the result of their prel iminat*y and/or final reviews of the above applications, it has been determined that:
- l.
A Class II fee ($1,200) is appropriate for Item l because the review was pro forma in nature since the requested action had already been approved for Unit No. 2. Therefore, a refund of $2,800 1s appropriate. This application was approved by Amendment No. 49 dated November 5, 1982.
- 2.
Four Class III fees ($16~000) are appropriate for Item 2 sir.ce the review involves consideration of three singie safety issues for Unit 2 and an unre-lated single safety issue for Unit No. l. Therefore, an additional sum of
$39700 is due for this application. Items 2.a~ 2.b and 2.c were approved by Amendment No. 47 dated October 12, 1982~ Amendment No. 12 dated October 15~
1982 and Amendment No. 17 dated January 27, 1983.
Item 2(d) is still pending final review.
-8302250024 830218 PDR ADOCK 05000272 p
PDR OFFICE>
SURNAME).-
DATE)ilo-NRC FORM 318 (10-80) NRCM 0240 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY r
- FEB 1 8 1983
\\
Although 10 CFR 170.22 permits the collection of a Class IV fee of $12>>300 for an application containing changes which involve more than one single safety issue~ it is USNRC policy to charge individual Class III fees in lieu of a Class IV fee when the number of single safety issues are less than four and only involve one unit. Therefore, you will note that for the three changes for Salem Unit No. 2, we are assessing a total of $12i1000 in lieu of
$12s300.
As a matter of information.the fee schedule in 10 CFR 170.22 is based on an application per unit with provisions for duplicate units that are essen-tially identical and filed at the same time.
For several safety issues to be a Glass IV fee, they must either be all for the same unit or common to both units. If common to both units, a duplicate unit Class I fee of $400 is also applicable.
In conclusion, we are applying to Item 2 the $2,800 refund due you for Item 1.
We request that your Company remit an additional sum of $900 to complete the fees for Item 2. If the ONRR's staff's final review of Item 2(d) reveals that the Class III fee ($4~000) is not appropriate for it, you will be notified and any necessary ad-justments will be made.
DISTRIBUTION:
PDR LPDR
/
Regulatory Files W. J. Ross, ORB-1 C. Parrish, ORB~l R. M. Diggs, LFMB LFMB Reactor File (2)
LFMB Pending Check File LFMB R/F Sincerely, 11p~* 1,; James Helroway, Jr;\\
' !fl
~Jilliam 0. Millers Chief License Fee Management Branch Office of Administration *