ML18087A639

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards SER & Technical Evaluation Rept, Review of Licensee Resolution of Outstanding Issues from NRC Equipment Environ Qualification SERs (F-11 & B-60). Justification for Continued Operation Due in 30 Days.W/O SER
ML18087A639
Person / Time
Site: Salem PSEG icon.png
Issue date: 01/21/1983
From: Varga S
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Uderitz R
Public Service Enterprise Group
Shared Package
ML18087A640 List:
References
NUDOCS 8301260278
Download: ML18087A639 (3)


Text

\\

1*

Plea~~ Send Copy of XA:;.PDR DISTRIBUTION W/SER & TER JA~ 2 1 1983 Docket File DISTRIBUTION W/SER ONLY DEi sen hut Do¢ket~No~050~2127Z Mr. R. A. Uderitz Vice President - Nuclear Public Service Electric and Gas Company Post Office Box 236 Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey 03038

Dear Mr. Uderitz:

NRC PDR OELD L PDR JMTaylor NSIC ELJordan DFischer CParrish JCalvo ACRS-10 SHBlJECT:

SAFETY EVAUUAn~oN REPORT FOR ENVIRONMEN!AL QUALIFICATION OF S.l\\FETY-RELATEO EU:CTRIC.11.l EQUIPMENT RE:

SALEM l This letter transmits the Safety Evaluation Report for the Environmental Qualification of Safety-Related Electrical Equipment at your facility.

This evaJuation is based on your response to our previous Safety Evaluation Report, dated June 8, 1981 and subsequent submittals dated September 10, 1921, February 8~ l9B2 and May 28, 1982.

This Safety Evaluation Report presents the results of the Environmental Qual i-fication Review for safety-related electrical equipment, exposed to a harsh environment9._.in accordance with NRC.

requirements.

We request that you provide your plans for qualification or

  • replacement of the unqualified equipment and the schedule for accomplishing your proposed corrective actions to us within ninety (90) days of the receipt of this letter.

As indicated in the conclusion section of the Safety Evaluation Report, we request that you reaffinn the Justification for continued operation and within thir;ty (30) days of receipt of this letter, submit information for items in NRC categories I.B, II.A and II.B {presented in the enclosed Technical Evalua~~

tion Report) for which justification for continued operation was not previously sutmitted to the NRC.

He suggest that the clarification set forth in item 8 of Generic Letter No. 82-09, "Clarification Questions and Answers on Environmental Qualification Requirements," should be considered in your justification for continued operation.

The Technical Evaluation Report contains certain identified information which you have previously claimed to be proprietary.

We request that you inform us as indicated in the proprietary section of the Safety Evaluation Report whether any portions of the identified pages still require proprietary protection.

'/As s<Eated in the Safety Evaluation, the staff is continuing to review your environmental qualification program and will be available, at your option, to discuss the findings in the enclosed SE and TERs.

Your su!:mittal datec!

November 24, 1982, has not been included in the staff's review to date.

Questions regarding this Safety Evaluation, the findings and actions required should be directed through the NRC Project Manager for Salem Unit 1.

OFFICE............................................... * **

-~**:_................... fease.. Send *co**.. ***ar

    • l():PDR.....

......................................... e~............. :....................

SURNAME. --8301260278 830121-

~~D-AT_e_~

~DR ADOCK os_o_o_o_~_b_~~...__~~-**_.. _

.. ~*-**_*.. _**_.. _

... _**~*-**_**_***_**_... _.. _

.. ~*-***_**_.. _

NRC FORM 318 (10-80) NRCM 0240 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY USGPO; 1981-335*960

1r.

,- ~JI

/

Mr. R. This letter affects fewer than ten respondents; therefore:. OMB clearance is not required under P.L.96-511.

Enclosures:

1. Safety Evaluation Report
2. Technical Evaluation Report cc w/o TER:

See next page ORB#rl : DL OFFICE. """"'ft.t:t>f!!-*"**

SURNAME **

Rf.i.~.r;J:wx.;.9.rn.... ~....

DATE **.Q.1L.!.f1J!..3............. ~.3 Sincerely,

C}rigir;al sir:;2ed lYJl ~

L~c.AQ Varga Steven A. Varga, Chief Operating Reactors Branch #1 Division of Licensing NRC FORM 318 (10-80) NRCM 0240

........................ /

                        • I!.***********

USGPO: 1981-335-960 J

t Mr. R. A. Uderitz Public Service Electric and Gas Company cc:

Mark J. Wetterhahn, Esquire Conner and Wetterhahn Suite 1050 1747 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, D. C.

20006 Richard Fryling, Jr., Esquire Assistant General Solicitor Public Service Electric and Gas Company Mail Code TSE - P.O. Box 570 Newark, New Jersey 07101

  • Gene Fisher, Bureau of Chief Bureau of Radiation Protection 380 Scotch Road Trenton, New Jersey 08628 Mr. R. L. Mittl, General Manager Corporate Quality Assurance Public Service Electric. and Gas Company Mail Code T16D - P.O. Box 570 Newark, New Jersey 07101 Mr. Henry J. Midura, Manager Salem Operations Public Service Electric and Gas Company P. O. Box 168 Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey 08038 Leif J. Norrholm, Resident Inspector Salem Nuclear Generating Station U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Drawer I Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey 08038 Mr. Edwin A. Liden, Manager -

Nuclear Licensing Public Service Electric and Gas Company Mail Code Tl6D - P.O. Box 570 Newark, New Jersey 07101 Ronald C. Haynes Regional Administrator - Region I U. s. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406 Mr. Charles P. Johnson Assistant to Vice President - Nuclear Public Service.Electric and Gas Company P. 0. Box 570