ML18046B422

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Evaluation of SEP Topic III-8.A,loose Parts Monitoring & Core Vibration Program.Need to Actually Implement Loose Parts Monitoring Program Will Be Determined During Integrated Assessment
ML18046B422
Person / Time
Site: Big Rock Point File:Consumers Energy icon.png
Issue date: 03/02/1982
From: Crutchfield D
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Vandewalle D
CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.)
References
TASK-03-08.A, TASK-3-8.A, TASK-RR LSO5-82-03-004, LSO5-82-3-4, NUDOCS 8203080083
Download: ML18046B422 (5)


Text

.,.

Docket No. 50-155 LS05 03-004 Mr. David J. VandeWalle Nuclear Licensing Administrator Consumers Power Company 1945 W. Parnall Road Jackson, Michigan 49201

Dear Mr. VandeWalle:

. ***~-- ~.* '.

March 2, 1982

SUBJECT:

SYSTEMATIC EVALUATION PROGRAM TOPIC III-8.A, LOOSE PARTS MONITORING ANO CORE BARREL VIBRATION PROGRAM - BIG ROCK POINT Enclosed *1s a copy of our evaluation of Systematic Evaluation Program Topic I II-8.A.:'

You are requested to exaniine the facts upon which the staff has based its evaluation and respond either by confirming thaf the facts are cor-rect, or by identifying errors and supplying the corrected.information.

We encourage you to supply any other material that might affect the staff's evaluation of this topic or be significant in the integrated assessment o*f your facility.

The need to actually in1plement a Loose Parts Monitoring Program will be determined during the integrated saf e:t.Y assessment.

Your response is requested within 30 days of receipt of this letter.

If no response is received by that time we wil 1 assume that you have no cow.ments or corrections.

Sincerely~

5fo/-..... SEP~

..... ORS#.~ if~....... Q~

.. 11.D '*

. g~...............,....

~*,SURNAME~ ** ~~

        • ~~-~~~~ ~.~ ***, * * * ~-~~.s.~ ~.l. ~. * * *. * * ~.~'!!~ ~. * * * -~..... ~~.... *. *. *. *.. ?.. *

~.~. *. ~/.......... *. *...... *....

~:~~-~~~3~~gg~3 o~585?~5.... -..~1!~1.&?.. ********.?/.~SJ.~.~********-~*********.2/p/~~- * * * * * * * * * *, * * * * * *

  • NA p,:.'

.. :*.:.. PD~.::*,. '

. OFFICIAL RECORD. COPY.

.,,I

Mr. David J. Vandewalle cc Mr. Paul A. Perry, Secretary Consumers Power Company 212 West Michigan Avenue Jackson, Michigan 49201 Judd L. Bacon, Esquire Consumers Power Company 212 West Michigan Avenue Jackson, Michigan 49201 Joseph Gallo, Esquire Isham, Lincoln & Beale*

1120 Connecticut Avenue Room* 325.

Washington, p. C.

20036 Peter W. Steketee, Esquire 505 Peoples Building Grand Rapids, Michigan 49503 Alan S. Rosenthal, Esq., Chairman*

Atomic Safety & Licensing Appeal Board

u. s. ~uclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.

20555 Mr. John O'Neill, II

  • Route 2, Box 44 Maple _City, Michigan 49664 Charlevoix Public Library 107 Clinton Street Charle.voix, Michigan Chairman County Board of Supervisors Charlevoix County Charlevoix, Michigan 49720 Office of the Governor (2)

Room l - Capitol Building Lan~ing, Michigan 48913 Herbert Semmel

  • Counsel fdr Christa Maria, et al~*

Urban Law Institute Antioch School of Law 2633 16th Street, NW Washington, D. C.

20460 B-i g Roe k Point Docket No. 50-155 Rev. 2/8/82 U. s. Environmental Protection Agency Federal Activities Branch Region V *offtte ATTN: "Regional Radiation Representative

. 230 South Dearborn Street Chicago, Illinois 60604 Peter B. Bloch, Chairman Atomic Safety and Licensing Board

u. s. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.

20555 Or. Oscar H. Paris

. Atomic Safety and Licensing Board*

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.

20555 *

. Mr. Frederick J. Shon Atomic Safety and Licensing Board u.. s. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washfogton, o: *c.

20555 Big Rock Point Nuclear.Power Plant ATTN:

Mr. C *. J. Hartman Pl ant Superintend*ent Charlevoix, Michigan 49720 Christa-Maria Route 2, Box 108C Charlevoix, Michigan 49720 William J. Scanlon, Esquire 2034 Pauline Boulevar.d Ann Arbor, Michigan 48103 Resident Inspector Big Rock P~int Plant c/o U.S. NRC RR #3, Box 600 Charlevoix, Michigan 49720 Mr. Jim E. Mills Route 2, Box lOBC Charlevoi~, Michigan 49720

e *.

~ 2 -

Mr. David J. Vandewalle cc Dr. John H. Buck Atomic Safety and Licensing*Appeal Board U. s. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. c.. 20555 Ms. JoAnn Bi er 204 Clinton Street.

Charlevoix, Michigan 49720 Thomas s. Moore

'Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, O. c.

20555 James*G. Keppler, Regional Administrator Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region III Office of Inspection and Enforcement 799* Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137

~ig Rock Point Docket Ni;>. 50-155

y*

e SYSTEMATIC EVALUATION PROGRAM TOPIC III-8.A BIG ROCK POINT TOPIC:. III-8.A, Loose Parts Monitoring and Core Barrel Vibration Program I.

INTRODUCTION The purpose of this topic is t9 review the inserv*ice surveillance program to detect loose parts and excessive motion of the main core support struc-

. ture.

The objective. is to detect loose.parts or excessive vibration be-fore they can cause flow blockage or mechanical damage to the-fuel or other safety related components.

-II.

REVIEW CRITERIA Standard Review Plan (SRP)* Section 4.4, Regulatory Guide (R.G.) 1.133.

III.

RELATED SAFETY TOPICS AND INTERFACES V-i, Compliance With Codes and Standards (10 CFR 50.55a)o IV.

REVIEW GUIDELINES See Evaluation.

V.

EVALUATION

1.

LOOSE PARTS MONITORING:

R.G. 1.133, "Loose-Part Detection Program for the Primary System.of Light-Water-Cooled Reactors, 11 Revision 2, describes features for monitoring loose parts w.ithin the reactor coolant pres*sure bounda-ry

"(RCPB)~ These features include sensors strategically located on the exterior surface of the RCPB capable of detecting acoustic dis-turbances, specifications for system sensitivity, alert levels, data acquisition modes and other system and procedural requirements.

Big Rock Point does not have a loose parts monitoring.Program that meets th~ criteria of this guide.

2.

CORE BARREL VIBRATION:

This concern is only for plants built by Combustion Engineering and has been resolved generically.

e**

i 2 -

VI.

CONCLUSION i;. A Loose Parts Monitoring Program, (i.e., detection system and proce-dures as spec1fied in-Section C.2 and C.3 of R.G. 1.133, Rev~.1) as currently required for new facilities does not exist at* Big Rock Point.*

2.

The portion of Topic III-8.A related to Core Barrel Vibr.ations does* not apply to Big Rock Point.

Th.e need to actually implement a Loose Parts Monitoring Program will.be deter-mined during the integrated assessment.