ML18046A579

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Draft Evaluation of Lead PWR Plant for SEP Topic IV-2.Util Requested to Evaluate Design of Plant Using Questions as Outline for Preparation of SAR
ML18046A579
Person / Time
Site: Palisades Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 04/24/1981
From: Crutchfield D
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Hoffman D
CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.)
References
TASK-04-02, TASK-4-2, TASK-RR LSO5-81-04-037, LSO5-81-4-37, NUDOCS 8104290502
Download: ML18046A579 (1)


Text

,.,_)..

Docket No. 50-255 LSOS-81-04-037 Mr. David P. Hoffman Nuclear Licensing Admniistrator Consumers Power Company 1945 W Parnall Road Jackson, Michigan 49201

Dear Mr. Hoffman:

Apri 1 24, 1981 RE:

SEP TOPIC IV-2, REACTIVITY CONTROL SYSTEMS Enclosed is a copy of the draft staff evaluation of the lead PWR plant for SEP Topic IV-2.

This assessment compares the lead PWR plant (R.

E. Ginna) with the criteria currrently used by the regulatory staff for licensing new facilities.

These criteria were reflected in the questions on this topic that were sent to you earlier this year.

You a,re requested to evaluate the design of your plant using the questions as an outline and to prepare a safety analysis report.

The report should be similar to the format in our evaluation of Ginna, however, it should specifically address the-*answers to questions asked previously by the staff.

In future co1~respondence regarding this topic, please refer to the topic number in your cover 1 etter.

Enclosure:

Draft SEP Topic I V-2 for G i nna cc w/enclosure:

See next page 8104290'50~

Sincerely, Dennis M. Crutchfield, Chief Operating Reactors Branch No. 5 Division of Licensing

  • See previous~yellow for additional concurrences.

NRC FORM 318 110/BOJ NRCM ~-240 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY I

\\

\\

  • USGPO: 1980-329-824