ML18039A311
| ML18039A311 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Browns Ferry  |
| Issue date: | 04/03/1998 |
| From: | Abney T TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9804150036 | |
| Download: ML18039A311 (107) | |
Text
CATEGORY 1 c =:
--2,;~
REGULA Y INFORMATION DISTRIBUTI.
SYSTEM (RIDS)
'ACCESSION NBR:9804150036 DOC.DATE: 98/04/03 NOTARIZED: NO FACIL:50=260 Bxowns Ferry Nuclear Power Station, Unit 2, Tennessee AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION ABNEY,T.E.
'Tennessee Valley Authority RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION Document Control Branch (Document Control Desk)
DOCKET"5 05000260
SUBJECT:
Requests relief from specified inservice insp requirements in Section XI of ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code,1986 Edition.Rev 1.to request for relief 2-ISI-6,encl for review approval.
DISTRIBUTION CODE: A047D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR I 'ENCL 3 SIEE:
TITLE: OR Submittal: Inservice/Testing/Relief from ASME Code - GL-89-04 NOTES:
RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD2-3 DEAGAZIO,A COPIES LTTR ENCL 1
1 1
1 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD2-3-PD COPIES LTTR ENCL 1
1 INTERNAL:
ILE CENTER RES/DET/EIB 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 AEOD/SPD/RAB NRR/DE/EMEB OGC/HDS3 RES/DET/EMMEB 1
1 1
1 1
0 1
1 EXTERNAL: LITCO ANDERSON NRC PDR 1
1 1
1 1
NOAC 1
1 D
0 U
E NOTE TO ALL "RIDS" RECIPIENTS:
PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE. TO HAVE YOUR NAME OR ORGANIZATION REMOVED FROM DISTRZBUTZON LISTS OR REDUCE THE NUMBER OF COPIES RECEIVED BY YOU OR YOUR ORGANIZATION, CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK (DCD)
ON EXTENSION 415-2083 TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED:
LTTR 14 ENCL 13
~(
7 C
I 4
Tennessee Valley Authority, Post Office Box 2000, Decatur, Ahbama 35609-2000 April 3, 1998 10 CFR 50. 55a (g) (5) (iii)
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN:
Document Control Desk Washington, D.C.
20555 Gentlemen:
In the Matter of
)
Tennessee Valley Authority
)
Docket No. 50-260 BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT (BFN)
UNIT 2 AMERICAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS (ASME)
SECTION XI, INSERVICE INSPECTION
'RELIEF REQUEST 2 ISI 6 r REVIS ION 1 In accordance with 10 CFR 50.55a(g)(5)(iii),
TVA is requesting relief from specified inservice inspection requirements in Section XI of. the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel
- Code, 1986 Edition (no addenda).
The enclosure to this letter submits request for relief 2-ISI-6, Revision 1
for NRC review and approval.
TVA has determined that 20 components have non destructive examination (NDE) coverage limitations (90 percent or less coverage completed) which exceeds that specified in ASME Code Case N-460, "Alternative Examination Coverage for Class 1 and Class 2 Welds,Section XI, Division 1.n The components are 19 reactor pressure vessel (RPV) nozzle-to-vessel welds and one nozzle inside radius section (ASME Section XI, Code Category B-D, nozzle-to-vessel welds).
The calculated NDE coverage completed varied for each component, ranging between 52 and 77 percent.
The limitations encountered during the performance of the ultrasonic (UT) examination were caused by component configuration and structural design.
The nozzle contours and the proximity of the biological shield wall limits access to the required weld volume and nozzle inside radius section.
9804l5003b 980403 VDR aDOCX 0S000abo I
Cl 4l C
I
. ~
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Page 2
April 3, 1998 The nozzle-to-vessel welds described above were examined during either the first or second period (Cycle 7 and 9
respectively) of the BFN Unit 2 ASME Section XI, inservice inspection, second ten year inspection interval.
TVA letter to NRC dated January 15,
- 1998, submitted ASME Section XI, inservice inspection and repair and replacement summary reports (NIS-1 and NIS-2) for Unit 2 Cycle 9 operation.
In that letter TVA committed to submit a request for relief by April 3, 1998, for the nozzle-to-vessel weld examination limitations described above.
TVA requests review of this relief request prior to the Unit 2 Cycle 10 (spring 1999) refueling outage to support scheduled ASME Section XI outage activities.
There are no new commitments contained in this letter.
If you have any questions, please telephone me at (256) 729-2636..
cer y
T. E. Abn Manager of Li sin and Indus y Affa'rs Enclosure cc:
See Page
Ii 0
(
C L
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Page 3
April 3, 1998 Enclosure cc:
(Enclosure):
Mr. Albert W.
De Agazio, Project Manager U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission One White Flint, North 11555 Rockvi;lie Pike Rockville, Maryland 20852 Mr. Mark S, Lesser, Branch Chief U.S. Nucl'ear Regulatory Commission Region II 61 Forsyth Street, S.W.
Suite 23T85
- Atlanta, Georgia 30303 NRC Resident Inspector Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant 10833 Shaw Road
- Athens, Alabama 35611
C ENCLOSURE TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY BROGANS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT (BFN)
UNIT 2 AMERICAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS ASME SECTION XI INSERVICE INSPECTION (ISI)
PROGRAM (SECOND TEN YEAR INSPECTION INTERVAL)
REQUEST FOR RELIEF 2 ISI 6 ~ REVISION 1 (See Attached)
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT (BFN)
UNIT 2 ASME SECTION XI INSERVICE INSPECTION PROGRAM (SECOND TEN YEAR INSPECTION INTERVAL)
REQUEST FOR RELIEF 2-ISI-6, REVISION 1 Re uest For Relief 2-ISI-6, Revision 1
Executive Summar This request for relief addresses 19 Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV) nozzle-to-vessel full penetration welds and one nozzle inside radius section.
The design configuration of the RPV nozzle-to-vessel welds and the small diameter instrumentation nozzle (4-inch) precludes a
100 percent ultrasonic examination of the required volume for the full penetration welds and the nozzle inside radius section of the components listed in Table 1.
These examination limitations occur when the ASME Section XI, 1986 Edition, no Addenda, examination requirements are applied in areas of components constructed and fabricated to early plant designs.
Based on a
construction permit date prior to January 1,
- 1971, BFN is exempt from meeting certain provisions of the code requirements for examination
- access, to the extent practical, within the limitations of design,
- geometry, and materials of construction of the components in accordance with 10 CFR 50.55a(g)(4).
An ultrasonic examination was performed on accessible areas to the maximum extent practical given the physical limitations of the subject welds and the inside corner region.
The design configuration limits ultrasonic examination of the RPV nozzle-to-vessel welds and inside corner region to the percentages shown in Table 1.
TVA concludes that performance E-2
Re uest For Relief 2-ISI-6, Revision 1 (continued) of an ultrasonic examination of essentially 100 percent of the RPV nozzle-to-vessel full penetration welds and the inside corner region of one 4-inch nozzle would be impractical.
The performance of the ultrasonic examination of the subject areas to the maximum extent practical provides an acceptable level of quality and safety because the information and data obtained from 0he volume examined provides sufficient information to judge the overall integrity of the welds and inside corner region.
Therefore, pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55a(g)(5)(iii), it is requested that relief be granted for the second inspection interval.
Unit:
~Setem:
Reactor Pressure Vessel System 329 19 RPV Nozzles, Full Penetration Welds 1
RPV Nozzle Inside Radius Section (Refer to nozzle and weld identification listed on page E-4)
ASME Code Class:
Section XI Edition:
Code Table:
ASME Code Class 1 (Equivalent) 1986 Edition, no Addenda IWB-2500-1 Examination Cate or B-D, Full Penetration Welds Of Nozzles In Vessels Examination Item Number:
B3.90, Nozzle-to-Vessel welds B3.100, Nozzle Inside Radius Section Code Re uirement:
ASME Section XI, Table IWB-2500-1, Examination Category B-D, Item Nos.
B3.90 and B3.100, Requires Volumetric Examination of 100 percent of the Weld E-3
'l
Re uest For Relief 2-ISI-6, Revision 1 (continued) and Adjacent Base Material and Nozzle Inside Radius Sections, respectively, as depicted in Figure IWB-2500-7(a).
Code Re uirement From Which Relief Is re uested:
Relief is requested from the'ASME Section XI Code requirement (Table IWB-2500-1, Examination Category B-D, Item Nos.
B3.90 and B3.100) to perform essentially 100 percent volumetric examination of weld and adjacent base material and nozzle inside radius sections.
List Of Items Associated With The Relief Re uest:
N1A N2A N1B N2B N2C N2F N2G N2H N2J N3B N3D N4A N4B N4C N4F N5A N5B NSA N9 NSA RPV Nozzle-to-Vessel Weld RPV Nozzle-to-Vessel Weld RPV Nozzle-to-Vessel Weld RPV Nozzle-to-Vessel Weld RPV Nozzle-to-Vessel Weld RPV Nozzle-to-Vessel Weld RPV Nozzle-to-Vessel Weld RPV Nozzle-to-Vessel Weld RPV Nozzle-to-Vessel Weld RPV Nozzle-to-Vessel Weld RPV Nozzle-to-Vessel Weld RPV Nozzle-to-Vessel Weld RPV Nozzle-to-Vessel Weld RPV Nozzle-to-Vessel Weld RPV Nozzle-to-Vessel Weld RPV Nozzle-to-Vessel Weld RPV Nozzle-to-Vessel Weld RPV Nozzle-to-Vessel Weld RPV Nozzle-to-Vessel Weld RPV Nozzle Inside Radius Section Basis for Relief:
The design configuration of the RPV nozzle-to-vessel welds precludes an ultrasonic examination of essentially 100 percent of the required volume.
The component design configuration limits ultrasonic examination coverage of the welds to the percentages listed in Table l.
~,
'l I
Re uest For Relief ISI-2-6, Revision 1 (continued)
The design configuration of the small diameter (4-inch) instrumentation nozzle; the ASME Section XI, 1986 Edition, no
- addenda, requirement for the examination coverage to extend from the inside radius section along the nozzle bore axis to a distance equal to the vessel wall thickness; and the short weld blend radius on the vessel outside surface, preclude an ultrasonic examination of essentially 100 percent of the required volume.
The component design configuration limits ultrasonic examination coverage of the inside corner region to the percentage listed in Table 1.
Alternative Examination:
None.
In lieu of the Code required essentially 100 percent volume ultrasonic examination, TVA proposes an ultrasonic examination of accessible areas to the maximum extent practical given the component design configuration of the RPV nozzle-to-vessel welds and nozzle size.
Justification For The Grantin Of Relief:
(1)
The design configuration of the subject nozzle-to-vessel welds precludes ultrasonic examination of essentially 100 percent of the required examination volume.
Access to the vessel-to-nozzle welds is by a series of doorways in the concrete biological shield wall.
Insulation behind these doorways is designed for removal around the nozzle circumference.
In order to examine the welds in accordance with the Code requirement the RPV would require extensive design modifications.
The physical arrangement of the nozzle-to-vessel weld precludes ultrasonic examination from the nozzle side.
The limitations are inherent to the barrel-type nozzle-to-vessel weld design and is compounded by the close proximity of the biological shield wall.
E-5
\\
'I 0
Re uest For Relief 2-ISI-G, Revision 1
(continued)
Scanning from the nozzle surface is ineffective due to the weld location and the asymmetrical inside surface where the nozzle and vessel converge.
Coverage was increased by scanning from the outside blend radius of the weld where practical.
Experience from the automated ultrasonic examination performed from the inside surface on BFN Unit 3, which is of similar design, has shown that the nozzle-to-vessel weld coverage will not be greatly improved even if performed from the inside surface utilizing the current state-of-the-art techniques, The configuration of the nozzle-to-vessel welds precludes ultrasonic examination from the nozzle side due to the weld location and the asymmetrical inside surface where the nozzle and vessel converge.
The extent of examination coverage from the vessel side provides reasonable assurance that no flaws oriented parallel to the weld are present.
In addition, approximately 100 percent of the required ultrasonic examination volume for flaws oriented transverse to the weld was performed from the vessel side.
The design configuration of the small diameter (4-inch) instrumentation nozzle precludes ultrasonic examination of essentially 100 percent of the nozzle inside radius section due to the short weld blend radius on the vessel outside surface.
The examination volume successively examined included the most highly stressed area of the nozzle inside surface region.
The area that received no coverage was the required volume of the nozzle bore at the greatest radial distance from the vessel center-line where the stress concentrations are less than the stresses in the areas where examination coverage was obtained.
The
I.
1 I
V
Re uest For Relief 2-ISI-6, Revision 1 (continued) examination coverage obtained provides reasonable assurance that no flaws are present.
(2) Radiographic examination as an alternate volumetric examination method was determined to be impractical due the radiological concerns.
Gaining access to the inside surface of the RPV to place radiographic film would require extensive personnel protection due to high radiation and contamination levels.
- Also, due to the varying thickness at the outside blend radius of the weld several radiographs may be required of one area to obtain the required coverage and/or film density.
The additional Code coverage gained by radiography is impractical when weighed against the radiological concerns.
Therefore, TVA concludes that performing an ultrasonic volumetric examination of essentially 100 percent of the nozzle-to-vessel full penetration welds in the RPV would be impractical.
Further, it would also be impractical to perform other volumetric examinations (i.e.,
radiography) which may increase examination coverage.
A maximum extent practical ultrasonic examination of the subject areas provides an acceptable level of quality and safety.
TVA concludes that significant degradation, if present, would have been detected during an ultrasonic examination performed to the maximum extent practical of the subject welds and inside corner region.
As a result, reasonable assurance of operational readiness of the subject welds has been provided.
Therefore pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55a(g)(5)(iii),
TVA requests that relief be granted for the second inspection interval.
E-7
Re uest For Relief 2-ISI-6, Revision 1 (continued)
Im lementation Schedule:
Reference:
ISI Pro ram Drawin s:
This request for relief is applicable to the second inspection interval for BFN Unit 2.
The nozzle-to-vessel welds and one nozzle inside radius section listed in Table 1 were examined either during the first or second period (Cycle 7 and 9
respectively) of the second ten year inspection interval.
General Electric Nondestructive Procedure titled; Geris 2000 OD System Calculation of Achieved Coverage ASME Section XI, Section V, Article 4 Exams 2-ISI-0222-C/S1 2-ISI-0222-C/S2 2-ISI-0269-C/S1 2-ISI-0270-C/S1 2-ISI-0270-C/S2 2-ISI-0271-C/S1 2-CHM-2046-C/S1 Revision 2
Revision 2
Revision 1
Revision 1
Revision 2
Revision 0
Revision 2
(See Attachment A)
Examination Data Re orts:
1" Period 2"" Period BF2-1001 BF2-1003 BF2-1005 BF2-1006 BF2-1008 BF2-1011 BF2-1021 BF2-1023 BF2-1025 BF2-1027 R-207 R-208 R-209 R-210 R-211 R-212 R-213 R-214 R-215 R-216 (See Attachment B)
Re uestForRelief2-ISI-6 Revision 1
continued TABLEI WEI D NUMBFRS S
ISI DRAWING PERCENT REMARKS NIA(Recirc. Outlet) 28" 2-IS14270-C 60%
Nozzle-to-Vessel 1VeliL 0, 45, and 60 deyee auto scanning svas restricted due to 1) nozzle configuration 2) bio!ogical shield and thermo-coup! es. Supplemental manual scan were performed to increase coverage. No cxams werc performed from the nozzle side NIB (Recirc. Outlet) 28" 2-ISI-0270.C 72%
Nozzle-to-Vessel Weld. 0, 45, and 60 degree auto scanning was restricted due to 1) nozzle configuration and 2) biological shield walL Supplemental manual scan were performed to increase coverage. No exams ice performed from the nozzle side N2A(Rccirc. Inlet) 12 2.ISI.0270.C 77 Nozzle-to-Vessel Weld. 0, 45, and 60 degree auto scanning was restricted due to 1) nozzle configuration and 2) insulation support obstruction. Supplemental manual scan were performed to increase coverage. No exams were performed from the nozzle side N2B (Recirc. Inlet) 12" 2-181.0270-C 52%
Nozzle-to-Vessel IVeld. 0, 45, and 60 degree auto scanning was restricted due to I)nozzle configuration and 2) insulation support obstmction. Supplcmcntal manual scan were performed to increase coverage. No exams were performed from the nozzle side.
N2C (Rccirc. Inlet) 12" 2-ISI.0270-C 77%
Nozzle-to-Vessel Wehh 0, 45, and 60 degree auto scanning was restricted due to 1) nozzle configuration and 2) insulation support obstruction. Supplemental manual scan were pcrformcd to incrcasc coverage. No cxanis were performed from the nozzle side.
N2P (Rccirc. Inlet) 12" 2-ISI-0270-C 55%
Nozzle-to-Vessel 1Veid. 0, 45, and 60 degree auto scanning was restricted due to I)nozzle configuration and 2) insulation support obstruction. Supplemental manual scan were performed to increase coverage. No cxams were performed from the nozzle side.
N20 (Recirc. Inlet) 12" 2-ISI.0270.C 77%
Nozzle.to-Vessel Weld. 0, 45, and 60 degree auto scanning was restricted due to I)nozzle configuration and 2) insulation support obstmction. Supplemental manual scan were performed to increase coverage. No cxams svcre performed from the nozzle side.
N2H (Recirc. Inlet) 12" 2.ISI.0270.C 77%
Nozzle-to-Vessel Weld. 0, 45, and 60 deyee auto scanning was restricted due to 1) nozzle configuration and 2) insulation support obstruction. Supplemental inanual scan were performed to increase coverage. No cxams were performed from the nozzle side.
N2J (Recirc. Inlet) 12" 2-1SI4270.C 55%
Nozzle.to.Vessel WelL 0, 45, and 60 degree auto scanning was restricted due to I)nozzlo configuration and 2) insulation support obstruction. Supplemental manual scan werc performed to increase coverage. No cxams vvere perfomicd from the nozzle side.
N3B (hfain Steam) 26" 2-1814222-C 75%
E-9 Nozzle-to-Vessel Weld. 0, 45, and 60 degree auto scanning was restricted due to I)nozzle configuration and 2) insulation support obstruction. Supplemental manual scan were performed to increase coverage. No exams werc performed from the nozzle side.
TABLE 1 continued WEI.DNUMBERS S
IS DRA 0
PERCENT s
~
REMARKS N3D (Main Steam) 26" 2.ISI-0222-C 57%
Nozzle-to-Vessel Weld. 0, 45, and 60 degree auto scanning was restricted due to the nozzle configuratioiL Supplemental manual scan were performed to increase coverage. No exams werc performed from the nozzle side.
N4A (Feed water) 12" 2-ISI4269.C 59%
Nozzle.to-Vessel 1Veld. 0, 45, and GO degree auto scanning svas restricted due to I)nozzle configuration, 2) adjacent NIIAnozzle and 3) insulation support ring. Supplemental manual scan were performed to increase coverage. No exams were pcrfonned from the nozzle side.
N48 (Fcedwatcr) 12" 2-ISI-0269 C G7%
Nozzle.to-Vessel Weld. 0, 45, and 60 degree auto scanning svas restricted due to 1) nozzle configuration and 2) insulation support obstruction. Supplemental manual st inrun performed to incrcasc coverage. No exams were performed from the nozzle side.
N4C (Feedwater) 12" 2-IS I-0269-C 67%
Nozzle-to-Vessel IVefd. 0, 45, and GO degree auto scanning svas restricted due to I)nozzle configuration and 2) insulation support obstruction. Supplemental manual scan were performed to increase coverage. No exams were performed from the nozzle side.
N4F (Fcedwatcr) 12" 2-ISI4269-C 54%
Nozzle.to-Vessel Weld. 0, 45, and 60 degree auto scanning svas rcstrictcd due to I)nozzle configuration, 2) insulation support obstruction and 3) adjacent insulation. Supplemental manual scan were performed to increase coverage. No cxams ivere perfomled from tile nozzle side.
10" 2-ISI-0271-C 53 Nozzle.to-Vessel Weld. 0, 45, and 60 degree auto scanning was restricted due to I)nozzle configuration and 2) insulation support ring. Supplemental manual scan svcrc performed to increase coverage. No exams were performed from the nozzle side.
NSB (Core Spray) 10" 2-ISI-0271-C 65%
Nozzle-to-Vessel Weld. 0, 45, and 60 deface auto scanning was restricted due to I)nozzle configuration and 2) insulation support obstruction. Supplemental manual scan were peffoilllcdto lllcfcase coverage. No cx:illlssvcfc performed from the nozzle side.
NSA (Instr. Nozzle) 4" CHM-2046.C 68%
Nozzle-to-Vessel Weld. 0, 45, and 60 degree auto snnning svas restricted due to the nozzle configuration. Supp!cmental manual scan were performed to increase coverage. No exams were performed from the nozzle side.
N8A(Instr. Nozzle) 4" CHhf-2046-C 73%
Nozzle Inside Radius Section. GO, 70, and 80 degree shear wave, manual scanning. Duc to the short outside surface blend radius area scanning was restricted causing an area of the inside radius to receive less than the required coverage.
N9 (CRD Return Line) 4" CHhf-2046 C 75%
Nozzle-to-Vessel Weld. 0, 45, and 60 degree manual scanning was'restricted due to I) nozzle configuration and 2) insulation support obstruction. No exams were performed from the nozzle side.
E-10
~
REQUEST FOR RELIEF 2-ISI-6, Revision 1
ATTACHMENT A ISI PROGEVQC DRAT'NGS
\\
-M27~
Q5M7~
XHS+026
-&HA
)05~
XA5 fj-
=
89 rm =-P~-I
.)05-2 IDEAS-2
-~f07 y~
/
fff,.f!!!!ffffflflllfffllfff ff 47Ã1767 47NS36-I SNIT-'EQP.
IJ a r ~
hQTR THIS DRAHIHS Cldt-206~
(SH. fJ PIPE ()ATA AQ5 CC I (EN)IVALEHT)
ASTH A fBS)tC 70 26' O.PSO 92NL TSALL Tla.
(CSJ d 2 0.79p hGV. HALL llfV. (SCÃ.
960'CSJ Q5-M+
N5-W2d Q5 &&CSf Q5-&4&CS2 ~
s" im=8f(
5%81) lCY4I OIS helK'.
PIPE SEQiKWTS CDNTAIHII5 TNO LWOIJMZPfAL SEARS HILL BE IDEHTIFIEDAS:
(BASE NKLO HO.JWS fD gOAV5TTKVO (SASE NELD ha.) ~-20 (OONKSTITSVO (Blsf NSLD hll.)WS fU (TfttSTRBVO (Blsf NELD )N.J ~-2U DPSTlKVO T)5~f SEAR TIILL BE 92RHTICALLYCLOSEST TO 0~ Nl TTK PIPE AAO le ~ 2 SEtW )(ILL BE 92AEVICALLYFARTHERMOST RANI Or OH T)5 PIPE (e.p. N-I Al f30'.
ANT N-2 AT Sf0'.)
%t$g e=m
)O5 &49f
-8N Oem2S>
NS-M2&V JO5-2 026<8~
Q5 2Fi~
Q5-2-MSf) fiO5-2~f0 Q5-&A~
Q5 2 O4M
)O5-2-fOd MB&46 I
- 2. PIPE SKQCHTS COlTAIHII5WLY DVE
)05 ~~S-2 LOHSITTA)IHALSftW HILL BE ID&VTIFIED AR'SS~82 JO5-2f0'ASE NELD hQ.J ~W (OONHSllKWJ
~JO5-2 f03
~)+tQ DTASE NKLO )Al.)~W (LdtSTRKWJ
~RNS 2 fp&S
>Vt JO5-&Odd A
SR
+FCV<f-Ofd
~~fWI&8C
~
~ ~~f~fg
~ACV&f~
Q5~
Q5~3f~
~<<>> ~f~f~
FCV&f~l
~TCH LINE d QUET 3
~ lROLM~
~
TTtTX 2+R274 RBXCfR 3
TROL< HR2PJ OEI A le MR259 TKTL4 iVRZSd
<<2'X ~
RfDICIR VIOL 2 IIR297 OET B fXfitd'7FIR OIIF CALCTILATIDV
/40~999-99OOJJ)
RES AIEMRl< 990929 109
~eS-Z-uif Q5 2-~f Q5-2-PKSP I
>'l'j~V~T J
All EtL t
~ PW~~ ttt tttttt Rk
~ ttt tait IA% DID tttt ~ 'ttt ~ tttt t~
TEIRIESSEE VALLEYAUTHORITY BRONNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 2 HAIJI STEAH SYSTEH NELO LOCATIOHS ALL A/0 HIST@IT RTSLARCNK0 AT R000
-Xsr-OZZZ C each
FCV~W27 TRA. 2errR2rrr TROL WINC6 rROL-2-rrRw 2 espy REDIrcER KNS &55<5-f~
05 &55CSM+
05 M54~
05-&4~>>
Q52 t6
.QS 2 WS~
Fcvwr~d.
TRIS, 2 NR26r Q5-2 t5 TRXEr2 AW262 I 68$~f4 TROL-Mlf63 05 MAO 05~f JWS 2-055 Q5-2-tM Plgoo e
~hSB-SE
~05 ~72
)~TCH LIHE X e
05 M794S 05~
05 W3605~
~Q5 2 25
~Q~ES-LS 68Ã~
~MLS
$$ $e eo
+ elo &eee oo o$ $$wee $
05 2oOCMW REFERENCE'RANIHGS:
47Kt767 47N335-t p
7 I/Ap IOCS ~t
~05"~
~05 &OdO 3'CIC S
CJ9I 206~
. 2)
AQ5 CC t (EPUIVALEHT)
AP>X'0.%<A'. ~
7 ICSJ 6'
0.7IS IKN(. NALL TIa. 5QI. t60 QTJ h)UTER ALL FIELD NELDS NERVE HADE BY TYl 05~45~
2 93$el RETKJCBT f7ET C-05-~83>
~M~~ie~
05~ ~$1~
re SS4-II$ -$$-$
05-W4 0
05 ~53 Q5 M-2-tS
~62 Q5 2-22 r'5-MAMA-I 05-M5tKS-2 I
I Ie I
II, I
I
~~ooze
~
Q5-2-26 QS 2-05~
05-~
-&AN y5
~S.
&48&8 I
~KS-2 oo-e$ $$$~
ow2klo~
oo oeo r $$$
~
~
ele I
A P
Mt&27 I
I I
e I
I I
I I
I ~
QS-2-IHS 05 W 05 &7 JWS-~
u
~~ro'ASCC
)
/CZC Ptt@~~
2-ft3 IFLKOIMJ
.. ~~$ ooe-$ eee
~"
Q5-2-to C
~ FCVWfW36 M2f6 05-2-076j' ShiTET 3 2-f$&j.s Q5-2-tf
~ttk F~~ ~~J ff5 IFLCJEO JKADJ
( g FCV&f~MC Xo$$
-ooioee'CS 2f~
oo 2$&es ~-
oo&eoe+s Q5 Mf Me Ije oe eee 4
ve eee D
~eo uw eee eeeeu ue oo eeeeeu eoeeooee
~~05 PCS oe$ oe ae ean eeee ow eeee eeee 'e we
$$$e TE79JESSEE VALLEYlUI7KNIITY Q5 2-2HS I QS-2-2H&2 8RONHS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT UHIT 2
, ICCIH STEAN SYSTEH NELO LOCATIOIIS n
EKEJ9$7 Ptt DW'E CACCJICATOrr (ACIM999-9soOJJI rrrrrs JJErc7 Rli 9so999 ro9 ILe EOC 6LB
~ eall ALL A/O HISTCRT RCARARCIEO AT Rgg 997 TE.'
. PIPE SEQI9(TS Cor(TAIHIHO TNO LOHOITIEIIHAL 56V5 NILL 8E IOEHTIFIED AS.
05 MO (BASE NE(D HO.J Ks-tO (OONr5TREAHJ (BASE NELD AO.J~ 20 (OONISTREAIIJ 05 (BASE NELD HO.J~-fU (UPSTREAI0 05 (8CSE NELD HO. ~-2U 86$STRSWJ TIE KS I SEAN NIU. BE H(9i&ICALLYCLOSEST TO 0>> OH THE PIPE AN THE ~-2 SE$VI NILL BE'L9IERICALL Y FARThKWCST FR(Nr 0 OV T)5 PIPE.
(9.0. <&I AT t30'. AN M-2 lT SIO'J
- 2. plpE sEOJJEHTs coHTAIHIH6 DHLY olJE Lpr(SITCEIIHAL SE$VI NILL 8E IOEHTIFIEO AR (BASE HELDle. J~W (OON$$STRSVIJ 6
FIELD NELD K ee QJO$ e NELO (BASE NELD HP,J~
gPSTREAIO NELD HP.
HAIH STEAII
~
~
I 4
4 Vt
~
J. FF NOBLES (l.&Ek RADILIS)
IR NH8 IR N~-IR N'HD IR NWE-IR NHF IR WRY-2-17
~14 wu~~~
t.
N9&&19 Qp~]g g
R%&$
REFZREPCE LRAN'Ih6S 4)T(ISCf N A7KU5-2 SF 7295152 LSZ~WM Qff. 1J RPRÃT NAP.
THT3'NAN'IASStd$SCGKS Cf~~
~
ALL 8%E78'.
NA SPECZFLCl TLDhK 40Pt~ Q 0 SW $$$ Ol ASSI~ MAPAEL
$$-~iS:Rl AF: ~~g
~~OfNWL l$$
$$ S $ $0 CX. $$$$L CHL NCC%4%RN JAI~ H Zf IV IQCO >SO Cf
~~meaaaemam ax~
Po~ @DC At~
ASK CC 1 gRZVAL5VQ h07ES f, CF l%RD ICOS IC9K Pal% Df llew FJml JIY TVA, 2o PIPE.'TE&4%T Ll5OITll7llWL8E4JS'KL tK 175TTlZHKD AS:
2di Z 12 RSXCSl SF'l
~Q'V &48 N9&&l0 ae$ Z 2d
~Wag ]I+
~
I T$T~
~
II~ ~III
~
~I1 I
~~I I
~
~d
~NT'~
~~ +w+g)"
gb+)4 ypo@gf MWWMM%
NATCTT~;
N%~
v"~
XFN &84 6f&&~~
6F~22~
AFV &45~
aar~&
JCV~
7 tllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
$$ 55$ $ $ $$ $
ICY~~
DTASF NEIDJ~ gONSTlKOO.-
QCK MR%~ gPSTTKQO '-
~ ~
/
~w~se~e
/
~ Z Me IKRCEH X~OOO StkÃICQl lN, Ref FIELD NELD FEEDNATKTT NELD he.
~ $$$ $ $
~%14$ $
Mw 5 g/Q I/I IVA IVl lP
~$$
$$$$%$ $$$ ISO~ $1$ $70$ $$ $0$
Owal MF INC ~
OM ~ ~ '~ ~ atI I~
lKhhRSKE VALLElAUTTRRZTY P
LN1'T PZ g FEEDS TER SYSTEN OLD LOCA TAWS J
EOC GLS
1 4
~,
a>>
N-2-Sf~
N-1-$4-LS~
N-2-SS ~+
2RKI~
2RK6 >>aa 2RJI 2RJ6 ~
aSOS 5t KR-2-46 KR1 46 LS~
'C OD SN (-N-2 26 I
.R(
FCV-66-JS FCY-dd-JS-BC N-1-2$ ~
N-2-22-LS 2R)5~
N-2-19 LS~
p N 2-22 KR-2-20 CR 2-19~
KR-2-19q N 2-fd-LS+
CR-2-$J HIA-SE CR 2 SJ LS KR-2-f$~
KR-2-f$ LS-I~ g
~
KR-2-45-LS-2~
2RFI 1RHI ~
. 2RC6~
~
280$~
N-2-12-LS~ )
2RF6
~
2RF$
N-2>>09-LS N-2-09 KR 2-14 REFERE 2 4712406 6.9 /
CE 769E96J (S.E.
TVA 47KI$44 2 Cf 2 ISJF7$ f KELLOCC BF 2 fbO NOTE/ THIS DRAY/NO SUPERSEDES CHM-2066% lLL SHEETS ES a>>~
)
.)
'LACtut...
DO I IS IS~ )
KR-2-11~
2 N-2-Id+
N-1-Od KR-2-OJ~
KR 2-IJ
~ KR-1-12 IES I
~ KR-2-12-LS new>> <<cd>
~ O ~
~
fEO SSE:<<O IIOTES: l.
1ELDS 2RXI ARE THE HOZZLE TO SAFE-EIID tELDS
- 2. ALL 2 tELOS ARE SOCKET tELDfD EXCEPT IHERE NOTED.
>>N-2RXS MATERIAL SPECJFJCAT(ONE AJ$6.
TP JOI O.JJ7 Hft/ rALL TNK. (SS) 1ALL THK, fSS) 22' I'.OJO HW.
1ALL THK.'fssl 1d X I. IJd'QI.
1ALL THK. $5$) SUCTION 2d' 1.$22'W.* tALL THK. (
J DISCHARCE SCN. d0 A-J76, TPJOI 2'ITTINCS A-fdb, FJOI SAFE EHD REPLACEMENT 12' 0.6dd ACM.
1ALL, THK (SS)
SA SOJ 1P JI6 H.II.
ASME CC-I (EOUIVlLEIVT)
I i 1
I
.f A,
I; ra I
.I Sj l
I
~'t 1
Sr En II
~'I l
J.
PIPE'ECMEHTS CONTAIN/HO T10 LONCITUOINAL SEAMS VILL Bf IDENTIFIED AS:
(Bldf VELD HO. J-LS-/0 (DOYNSTREAAI) fdlSf 1ELD NO. J-LS-20 (DOYNSTREAM)
(BASE tELO HO. )-LS-IU (UPSTREAM)
(BASE 1ELD NOD)-LS lU (UPSTRE4I)
THE -LS>>I SEAN tILL Bf NUMERICALLYCLOSEST TO D'N THE PIPE.
AHD THE -LS-2 SEAll 1ILL BE NUMERICALLYFARTHERMOS.
FROM O'l THE PIPE.
(R.t. -LS-I AT IJO~ A/DJ -LS 2 AT JIO')
PIPE SECMENTS CONTAIN/HO ONLY OVE LONCITUDINAL SEAM 1ILL Bf IDENTIFIED AS (BASE rfLD HO.)-LS-D (DOXNSTREAM)
(BlSE 1fLD AQ.)-LSW (UPSTREAM)
KR 244 p
N-2>>07 KR 2 47g O'ECONTAMINATIONLINE KR-242-LS~
RBC-2-1
'C S
~KR-2-02 KR-2 47-LS-I~~
KR-2AT-LS-2~
N-2-$6~ As FCY-dd-Ol FCY-66&1~
ul-1-$7~~
1 NMSLS I
~ N-24J-LS-2
~ N-2-0J
~ FCV-ddt FCY&6&J-BC CR-2-01 Y
~>>no>>
j T
tgN>>>>
~~>>geC 2d ON lt Na on an on
/EA
~NINO lta NN INOI>> NOON SN N>>N ND ONS Nta ~ ~
ONO S
TEIENESSEE YAILEY AUIIKtt/fy BROBNS FERRY NLICLEAR PL,ANT UNIT 2
'ECIRCULATION SYSTEM KRWM K N KELLOCC SIKt 1ELD P
~SEED N 0 N CE FIELD 1ELO j UNIT HO SYSTE)/
1RXH I
IILI SEED OD.
LIVITIIO +
8/Sfsf SVS'Tg/
LETTER
~JIM! I EDC CL8 ID lll>>2 49~
rZr9~~-rancor j~
CR 1-02
~ /~ r~
A EXEIPIT PER DIVf CALCXAT/OV
/kOM999 96OOJJ/
RINS lkEIAf /IIV 9$Od29 109
(>>a ALL A/0 HIST0RV RLSLARCHL0 AT R000 CCD
REFEREHCE D
2-f792408-8.9
.f. REPL...VEHT)
Cf 7b'9E963 (S.
REPLACEVENT)
TYA 47KI544 2 CE 2-ISJF754 KELLOGG BF 2 IdO HOTE5 THIS DRATING SUPERSEDES CNV-2068< ALl. SHEETS 1RA I 2Rl6 Oe
<FCY-68-33
/
FCY 6d-JJ-BC
~
2RAS
"'3 I""'.
2REI~
~
2 2RE6 ~
1RPI 2RD6 ~
CR-2-59 CR-2-59-Ls KR-2-SO ~
KR-1-SO-LS-I~ y KR-1-50-1.5-2~
blATERIAL SPECIFICATI()HSt
- lJ58, TP 304 O'
O.JJ7'V tlLL THK. (Ss) 11' 0.569o AQV. TALL THK.
SS 1d'
- f. 138'OV.
tA L THK.
SS) SUCTION 2d X I.J21'W.
TALL THK, (
) DISQ/ARCE GR-2-60~
GR-2-60-Ls ~
GR-2-61 (OL) q~
GR-2-Sd-Ls
.(
2RCI ~
2R86 ~
2'CH.
dO. AJ76, TPJOI FITTIHCS Atd2,FJDe
~e 6$1-2-48 2RC6~
2RES~
GR-2-3$-LSq I
SAFf EHD REPLlCEVEHT 12 Z 0. 6dd NV. TlLl. THK, (Ss)
SA 403 tP J16 H.G.
KR-2-62 2RBS~
GR-245-LS~
'eee 5
5 5g 1RDS ~
CR-2-3d-Ls~
p CR-2-35 KR-1-Jb'R-2-38 q KR-2-35q ASVE CC-I (EOUIVALENT)
CN 2&l-CS~-)
KR-2HI GR-2-4 I~
KR-1-JJ~
1O KR-1-J7 22'BlsE TELD N. )-LS-ID (DOTHSTREAV)
(BlSE TELO N.) LS-1D, (DOTNSTPEAV)
(BlSE tELD N.)-LS-IU'UPSTREAV)
(BASE tELD NO.)-LS-2U (UPSTREAV)
THE -LS-I SEAN tlLL Bf NUVERICALLYCLOSEST TO O'N THE PIPE, AND THE Ls 2 SfAll TILL BE HUVERICALLYFARTHERVOST PROV O'V THE PIPE.
(e.t. -LS-'I AT IJO, AN -Ls-2 AT JIO')
J.
PIPE SEGVENTS CONTAIHINC ONLY 0VE LITIGITUDIHALSEAN tlLL BE IDENTIFIEDAS (BASE TELO N.)-LS-D (DOTNSTREAV)
(BASE TELD N. )-LS-U (UPSTREAV)
Gt-2-61-LS CR-2-66 KR-23b Ls+ KR2 Jb+
CR-2-.JI tn Oeg I
~ 5 KR-2-25~
HOTESt
- t. ALL 2'ELDS ARE SOCKET TELDED EZCEPT tHERE HOTED.
GR 2-66-LS 1 PIPE SEGVEHTS CONTAINING TTO LONITUDINAL SEAVS TILL Bf IDENTIFIED AS5 2
e'C
~ '
2 5
~
~
KR-2-51g KR-2 24 Ls~
KR-2-26 p
GR-2-33 A'R-2-st-Ls-I~~
KR2SI LS2~
CR-2-62~y FCY-68-77 FCY-68-77-BC >
CR-2-63 +~
5ev
~ KR-2-26 GR-2-63A I fe fiR-2-638 CR-2-29-LS-I GR-2-29-Ls-2 A AM
+
GR-2-63-LS
~ FCV-68-79 Dh CONMIIIOCID.NCINE ZR-H-N "DCN EEEMI PEN Ie. EJIDNJclclc J ~i i ~WEED No ~IL Escs co L5 Iko-00999 TdooJJI K ~ KELLOGG SHOP tELD
~I' JNISCN'IES AIE~ RIV 950829 109 0
es GE FIELD TELD 5y51f8 UNI N 5y5IfcV Lf1 1f8 f"t:~iU1L'Cl" I lllllllllllllllllllllll 5
~
ee 555 ooeee$
555 5555&
eet
~ 5
$tt
~>
W, OID
~Io ea tfWfssff TALLfy AVINoRIly 5
-ese-ozro-o CCD BROTHS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 2 RECIRCULlTICH SYSTEN T L OCATIONS
~
~
0" AffPCV FCV-75-$J
'-frfa~~~<c DCS t2>>
FLEIED HEAD DSCS-2 16B~
FLVED HEAD
~ig%. B Fcv 75 25
~ DCS-2-OJ FLVEO HEAD DSCS 2-16A FLVED HEAD
+
k i~>
~b E.
Wq.
~,s./)
ss's-2-f 21 (OL) ~~I C
S TAIHLEss BQt
+
g+
Q
~0 STEEL TCS-2-f22 0
0 6~c C~BS'~
<~
DCS-2-1 J-LS
+ r f0.
<<DSCS-2-C: -Ls CS-2-IJA-LS DCS 2 07~
SEE NOTE I oscs-2-oz OSCS-2-02 Ls tg OCS-2-OJ-L 5'2 DCS 2 tz-Ls~
d DCS-2-0<
DCS Z IJ
~ OCS-2-Of-S
~~ DSCS-2-01
. DCS IJA SEE NOTE I REFEREN< c utfAfttg BRA VO E-zf58-DRAVO E-2~58 HCitE THIS 0RAWI J CHtf-2071-C ALL SHEETS AIATER IAL SPECI F ICA TIONS IZ SCH. 80 Sl JJJ GR6 CS
- 12. 75 A' 6dr'tN.
WALL THK.
12 sett.
d0 ASTH AJ$8 Ctf JOf SS 12.7$
A'687 HOM.
WALL THK.
10 SCH. 80 SA JJJ Ctfd CS t0.7$. i.$9$
aov.
WALL THK.
10'CH. 80 ASTH AJJd CR JOf Ss 10+ 7$
X.59J H0N.
WALL THA'.
ASltE CC-I (EOUIlALEsrT) r
~0&r 1
~
618
~~res t ios~--
HCV 75 55
~HCV 75 5$ -BC srAiHLEss srEEL
~ TCS-2-fft6>>
1 TCS-2-f2J B
OB coca 4 os Cp ~p 7csc -~s>-z S rsCS
-1a
-ec 7sc f~r DCS-2-07-LS~
Dscs-2-09 DSCS-2-09-Ls
FCV-75-54 FCV-75-5f-BC QCS 2 Sto TCS-2-f09 /
TCS-2-f07 TSCS-2-f08 NOTET OA'CS - H N
DS~ORAVO SITOP WELD T~TVA FiELD WELD vuir No.
(BASE WELD NO. )-LS D (DOWNSTREAM)
(BASE WEI.D NO. )-Ls U (VPSTREAAI)
TS~ TVA SHOP WEI.D 1.
WELOS Ocs-z 07 AND DCS-2-1 JA ARE DRAVO SHOP WELDS.
- 2. Ptf'E SECAIEHTS CONTAINING ONLY OhtE LOHOITUDIHAL SEAu WILL BE IDENTIFIED AST ts tt CC tlttl ttff llllll!Illllli'll!
lllll
~t~
ftt-tttt.g ALL A/O HISfOTT RESEAAOHEO Af ROOO w
stt w
sts w t~ ss tetat tss aromas asassees oslo as ae ts ssstst
~s socl%ssts sl M sts s~ sQ'4\\os ~Itsst tss sts sws tsmgg Kt sLtt ssss tw sw ws
'eH%
op%
S ffttttESSEE VAEEET lttfttOtttff 8ROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 2 CORE SPRAY SYSTEM WELD LOCATIONS ltttsmtt tW osttr t tt<t lt I I tttftttftt ttt srsttotgtt, ttNIt 0 I OF' I tft ttttttt1tfttt fstd 2-ISI-0271-C CCD
0 NI)~ZCRCVP )
H12X HIIX Hsx HSX NS HI SX N2X NIX H9X Seo 0 1 ST TO CCAT I 44.5'44'24'44.5'59.50 294.5'79'44'45.$'
4100 270
~,}
T MATING SVRFACC 140 REFERENCE DR/IH'INGS (GE)
SRKTCHKS RPV EXANINAT ION PLAN (CKI SX-8200 SX-8200$
SX 82010 SX 82005 SX 82007 SX 2
4 8
LEGEND 3
VESSEL NOZZLE FVLL PENETRATION NOZZLK TELO ASME CC-7 (EOI/IVALENT)
C 5-FLO550'10'0'Q V-54 DQ ICCS V-54 245'I28 VKSSEL STA8ILIZERS 165' 5-A H12A
~5 ~
547' 5-4 V 44 221'-4 8
107.'H A
Qo Hk Y-54 C-2-5 Qo II4E 0o 245'o
~
Y-5-8 N168 145' NCC Qo N9 NSA Qo NS-ZR QP.k V-5-A 45' LSL 591.$
'ee.
NO'IESI 1.
REFER TO RPV MANUAL FOR NATERIAL SPECIFICATIOI ANO HATER!AL THICKNESS.
2 ~ NOZZLES N-CIA, H-118, N 12A, N 128, N-14A, ANO N-148 ARE CATECCRT 84, BCLTLIHE REGION Qo Qo Qo FEPPPPEPEEEEEii%
Qo Qo Qo Qo Qo Qo Qo C9 NSA~%
0'54.5'II llllllllllllllllllllllll
~I C5ICSI 5/vo sssvlvss CO C 1 CIOI sill C llllls SSISSS lit Asklk k A7 7
AOA k/A ASOA k/4 k/A CO ACVISCO PCA OIVS VCVO Sll 5/0505 sos CVAVOC AC/
OAIC 0/IS CPS OSOI AVIO TCSOIKSSCC VALLCT AUTHOR!TV IISO CAOAIC TANGENT LINE/LOtER HEAO tELO
~OICCAI ACAO I OICIG~IHAL" ALI A/Ti HISTCRT RESEARCHEO AT R000 BROONS FKRRT HVCLEAR PLANT VHIT 2 S
RMIN PRESSURE VESSEL (RPV)
SELL CNISE CELO/NlllE LOCATIIZ6 )IZI)SIRE VIEI)
OAASVC k/A OAICI k/A kl AOAV I l~
ckccvcoI k/A Astooyco 96cc 01 OF 02 SIISVICICOI k/A CLS 2-CHV-2046-C ooc
REQUEST FOR RELIEF 2-ISI-G, Revision 1
ATTACK4ENT B E3DQCXNATXON DATA REPORTS E-12
~
~
~
~
EXAMINAT(ON
SUMMARY
SHEET
....'::::.:.I.".'::"-.':,::". ":.:.:'GE:.',;'Nucle'ai Eri er'gji'::;":
REPORT NO.:
F-PROJECT S
SYSTEM:
WELD NO PROCEDURE:
REV~ FRR: ~NT N/A
~l REV~ FRR:~
~l CONFIGURATION'XAMINER'XAMINER:
EXAMINER:
LEVEL:
EBI LEVEL:Jl WELD TYPE REY:~ FRR:~
.~l T~ MT D PT N UT I~ VT TQ CIRCUMFERENTIAL C3 LONGITUDINAL II OTHER DATASHEET NO.(S):
CALSHEET NO.(S):
+SIshbrw During the Automated and Manual ultrasonic examinations of the above referenced weld, no reportabte indications were recorded as per ASME Section XI. 1986 Edition, No Addenda, Category B.D welds and Reg. Guide 1.150.
Automated UT examinations were performed in accordance with UT-BFN-702VO Rev. O. The Manual UT examinations were performed in accordance UT-BFN-300VO Rev. 0.
Automated UT examinations were restricted due to the bioshield.
The Manual UT examinations were restricted due to a thermo-couple.
The GERIS system recorded the following nonrelevant indications:
0 L-wave
- clad noise 45 T-scan
- entry surface noise 604 T-scan
- entry surface noise, clad noise 454 T-scan ODBR - entry surface noise, clad noise, nozzle geometry 604 T-scan ODBR - entry surface noise, nozzle geometry 45 P-scan - entry surface noise 604 P.scan
- entry surface noise These nonreievant indications were flagged and excluded from the final reports.
No indications requiring evaluation per ASME Code Section XI and Reg. Guide 1.150 were recorded.
The Automated UT and Manual UT composite coverage EE 60.32% code credit taken.
Due to the nozzle to vessel weld design it is not feasible to effectively ultrasonically examine 100% of the ASME Code examination volume as defined in Section XI.
g TVR-/F3-Ctz/A/Ir/iNpv/BIgTEDZg 5go - gpg g/O'. IJ. TPc. IR rr H83
- 8PiLre ~ ZF-iS. V8Z. JR S C 3 - 8 0.7i C.. /R. g CI 8F>. TPz. iZ. ROZ d Sg Ef'C'y. 7BP. iy. gCP.
S7 - SF'. /MA.iiI,N3' EXAMCOMPLETE ADDITIOMAI.DATASHEETS:
Mlh 5 PAR'TIALLYExAMIMED(ExPLAINIMcoMMENTs)
A, EXAM COMPLETE IM COMBINATIONWITH I
DATASHEETS BElOW coMPAREDTD: QPsl Q ISI REPoRT No.lsl:
HO. OF N NCO NO ABLE IH OICA TIN HN~
Q NO CHANGE C] ONACCBFTABLH NO,OFBBFONTABLNINNCATIONB:~
~<a-i LEVEL DATE
SUMMARY
BY
/~O-/j-P'E REVIEWED BY LEVEL DATE r~ 9s UTIUTYREVIEW I
E
~
I ANII REVIEW
/~6-26.
DATE t
'M$
7~
E.~OF.~
DATE
~0 I
~ ETLTAurHELBEY S
Sun Oct 9 12:16:00 1990~-.-"
~ - 27
'7
'M DATA
SUMMARY
SHEET Plant:
Browns Ferry Unit 2 Weld ID: NlA Code Category:
B-D Evaluation Level:
50 Relevant Indications:
No Non-Relevant Indications:
Yes Indications Requiring Further Evaluation:
No N1A Page 1 of 2 Browns Ferry Nuclear 2 Cycle 7 Page ~~f ~t UT Channel Information:
Active Channel Examination Transducer Type Angle Orientation Search Unit-Offset Angle X
Y 1
2 3
4 T
W T
B 45 0
60 0
-5.3 0.0 4.6 0.0 3.00 0.00
-3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Patch Information:
Patch ID Cal ID Exam Exam Exam Start End Date Examiner Init/Lvl bfn2.nla.tl BF2.BF-18. TFL. 1A 04: 59 05: 26 10/07/94
~
~
.:;::.; I.::::.:::::.:::::-.::::.;::.. :":::::."::.':::!'GF:::Nuc'. eir,.'Eiieigy, EXAMINATION
SUMMARY
SHEET PROJECT'YSTEM WELD NO.'ROCEDURE:
REV~ FRR:~
~NI
~I REV~ FRR:~
~l CONFIGURATION'XAMINER:
EXAMINER:
EXAMINER:
LEVEL:
II LEVEL:~
LpyEL ~I WELD TYPE:
L3MT PPT OUT PVT P CIRCUMFERENTIAL P LONGITUDINAL IN OTHER DATASHEET NO.(S):
gg II-Pr-TE CALSHEET NO.(S):
@~QofK During tho Automated and Manual ultrasonic examinations of the above referenced weld, no reportable indications were recorded as per ASME Section XI, 1986 Edition, No Addenda, Category B.D welds and Reg. Guide 1.150.
Automated UT examinations wore performod in accordance with UT-BFN-702VO Rev. O. The Manual UT examinations were performed in accordance UT-BFN-300VO Rev. 0.
The GERIS 2000 OD automated UT system and Manual UT 0 reference is located at 3:00.
The GERIS system recorded the following nonrelevant indications:
04 L-wave
- clad noise, nozzle geometry 454 T-scan
- cladnoise 60o T-scan
- entry surface noise, clad noise, nozzle geometry 454 T-scan ODBR - entry surface noise, nozzle geometry 604 T-scan ODBR - nozzle geometry, electrical noise, geometry OD surface 45o P.scan nia 60 P-scan - entry surface noise These nonrelevant indications were flagged and excluded from the final reports.
454 and 604 T-scans were recorded indications requiring evaluation per ASME Code Section XI and Reg. Guide 1.150 were recorded and were found to be acceptable.
The Automated UT and Manual UT composite coverage BE 56.7%
Due to the nozzle to vessel weld design it is not feasible to effectively ultrasonically examine 100% of the ASME Code examination volume as defined in Section XI.
+TVA-BF'W CRL/aerugo~
gV~gZA.S ~ jr-// pH FIEND - 8F>. SS - /F. 77/.. //
5'll'3 - 8FA/>. E/= -18. 7.84, //rf df'
- 8/ >. <~~. /A. Rc a 5k5-ZFQ. 7PL. //I. Rc,3 58'7-8/ >.
BR. iA. /T'CZ SVIf'- BP'a..8a/g. gCI Q EXAMCOMPLETE 5 PARTIALLYEXAMINEDIEXPLAININ COMMENTS)
P EXAMCOMPLETE IN COMBINATIONWITH DATASHE S BELOW ADDITloNALDATAsHEErs:
N/A coMPAREDTD: E!Psl Nlsl REPDRTND.(SI:
P NO CHANOE NO. OF RECOROABLE INOCATIONB~
EXAMINATIONRESULTS:
Q ACCEPTABI.E
SUMMARY
BY LEVEL DATE
~o-E REVIEWED BY LEVEL DATE p uNACCEPTABLE
/'/ ~Ps I~6ZI-UTILITYREVIEW
~ l PAGE:~OF:~
ANIIREVIEW FDRTADTNEEEV S NO. OF RE FOIITABI.EINOCAOONB:~
~
~
II
~
Thu Oct 13 18:47:32 1RSW." H ~ ~BW.3 m DATA
SUMMARY
SHEET Plant:
Browns Ferry Unit 2 Weld ID: N3D Code Category:
B-D Evaluation Level:
50 Relevant Indications:
Yes Non-Relevant Indications:
Yes Indications Requiring Further Evaluation:
No N3D Pae lof 6 Page ~2 Browns Ferry Nuclear 2 Cycle 7 UT Channel Information:
Active Examination Transducer Orientation Search Unit-Offset Channel Type Angle Angle X
Y 1
2 3
4 T
W T
B 45 0
60 0
-6.3 0.0 5.4 0.0 3.00 0.00
-3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Patch Information:
Patch ID Cal ID Exam
= Exam Exam Start End Date Examiner Init/Lvl bfn2.n3d.tl bfn2.n3d.tl.1 BF2.BF-18. TPL. 1A 18: 19 19: 47 10/11/94 g BF2.BF-18.TPL.1A 21:34 22:42 10/11/94 5
~
~
t
. -::"::::::::::,::.::::::::::.:,':::,,-::;:;::::.GF,:Nii'c eii 'Eiie'rgb,',
EXAMINATION
SUMMARY
SHEET REPORT NO.:
PROJECT'ROCEDURE:
ITEV~ FRET:~
N/A SYSTEM'ELD NO.:
CONFIGURATION'XAMINER'XAMINER:
EXAMINER:
LEVEL:~)hatt LEVEL:~
LEVEL:Jl WELDTYPE:
FFEFF:~
F FETOR~
~f PMT PPT NUT PVT P CIRCUMFERENTIAL P LONGITUDINAL 8 OTHER DATASHEET NO.(S):
CALSHEET NO.(S):
4 SEE'LT'ES During the Automated and Manual ultrasonic examinations of the above referenced weld, no reportable indications were recorded as per ASME Section XI, 1986 Edition, No Addenda, Category B.D welds and Reg. Guide 1.150.
Automated UT examinations were performed in accordance with UT-BFN-702VO Rev. O. The Manual UT examinations were performed in accordance UT-BFN-300VO Rov. 0.
Automated UT examinations were restricted duo to insulation support ring. The 60 T-scan Manual UT examination was restricted due to the insulation support ring.
Tho GERIS 2000 OD automated UT system and Manual UT 0 reference is located at 3:00.
Tho GERIS system recorded the following nonrelevant indications:
0 L-wave
- noulo geometry 454 T-scan
- clad noise, electrical noise 60 T-scan
- noule bore geometry 45 T-scan ODBR - entry surface noise, nozzle bore geometry, clad noise, electrical noise 604 T-scan ODBR - noule bore geometry, entry surface noise 45 P-scan - clad noise 60 P-scan - entry surface noise Those nonrelevant indications were flagged and excluded from the final reports.
454 and 60 T-scans were recorded indications requiring evaluation per ASME Code Section XI and Reg. Guide 1.150 were recorded and were found to be acceptable.
The Automated UT and Manual UT composite coverage ~ 54.2% code credit taken.
Duo to the nozzle to vessel weld design it is not feasible to effectively ultrasonically examine 100% of the ASMB Code examination volume as defined in Section XI.
+ NA-8/>
Pug/IA~4~
/L/~~aC~C 4'F-8'-'/y Sr.o-Ea. 8S-iZ.re, I///
S EP'- /PE.784. iA. RCS 5 0 f -
o P. 7',. /8. 8C 'f 44 '7-P4. ra/.. iL /I'CS 5$'0 - gri.7W. /g. ZC4 g'z- @~pa. zf-xZ.i'.I~
Q EXAMCOM CaVE ADDITIONALDATASHEETS:
NIA ll PARTIALLYEXAMINEDIEXPLAININ COMMENTS)
P EXAMCOMPLETE IN COMBINATIONWITH DATASHEETS BELOW COMPARED TO: Q PSI 8 ISI REPORT NO.(SX N/A EXAMINATIONRESULTS:
5 ACCEPTABLE Q No CHANOE Q uNACCEPTABLE NO. OF RECORDABLE INDICADONO~
NO. OF R FP!IRTABLE I NO ICATIBER~
SUMMARY
BY LEVEL DATE
~ ~/LF ~lc-g5'F CE REVIEWED BY LEVEL DATE UTILITYREVIEW I
~
~
ANIIREVIEW I~D2-DA E I~Il-DATE PAGE:~OF:
~OORT VF40 FETE r
\\
Mon Oct 24 14:23:12 1994'- -" ~ a~~g DATA
SUMMARY
SHEET N4F PWewh~rPy Nuclear 2
Cycle 7 Page ~~
Plant:
Browns Ferry Unit 2 Weld ID: N4F Code Category:
B-D Evaluation Level:
50 Relevant Indications:
No Non-Relevant Indications:
Yes Indications Requiring Further Evaluation:
No UT Channel Information:
Active Channel Examination Transducer
- Orientation Search Unit-Offset Type Angle Angle X
Y T
W T
B 45 0
60 0
-9. 1 0.0 7.3 0.0 3.00 0.00
-3.00 0.00
- 0. 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Patch Information:
Cal ID Exam Exam Exam Start End Date Examiner Init/Lvl bfn2.n4f.tl BF2.BF-18.TPL.1A 00:10 00:55 10/15/94
'I'. i
.:::::::".':;:::i::D:.,::":::;,:'L.::,:",,,:',:;::GE::Nuclear.:Eiier'gy.-.;
EXAMINATIQN
SUMMARY
SHEET PROJECT'YSTEM:
WELD NO.:
CONFIGURATION EXAMINER:
EXAMINER:
EXAMINER'EVEL:
II LEVEL:~
PROCEDURE:
WELDTYPE:
REV~ FRR: JB!
N/A
~/
RBV~ F/TR:~
~/
REV~/
FRR:~
~/
OMT QPT 0 UT CIVT 0 CIRCUMFERENTIAL 0 LONGITUDINAL 0 OTHER DATASHEET NO.(S):
CALSHEET NO.(S):
WSfc vvor c, @I4.]II During the Automated and Manual ultrasonic examinations of the above referenced weld, no reportable indications were recorded as per ASME Section XI, 1986 Edition, No Addenda, Category B-D welds and Reg. Guide 1.150.
Automated UT examinations were performed in accordance with UT-BFN-702VO Rev. 0 and the Manual UT examinations were performed in accordance UT-BFN-300VO Rev. 0.
Automated UT examinations were restricted due to N11A, nozzle insulation and insulation support ring. The 60'-scan Manual UT examinations was restricted due to the insulation support ring.
The GERIS 2000 OD automated UT system and Manual UT 0'eference is located at 3:00.
The GERIS system recorded the fo'llowing nonrelevant indications:
O'-wave
- clad noise. entry surface noise 45'-scan
- clad noise 604 T-scan
- entry surface noise, nozzle geometry 45'-scan ODBR - entry surface noise, clad noise, nozzle geometry 604 T-scan ODBR - entry surface noise, clad noise, nozzle geometry 45'-scan - clad noise 60 P-scan - entry surface noise These nonrelevant indications were flagged and excluded from the final reports.
60 T-scan indications were recorded requiring evaluation per ASME Code Section XI and Reg. Guide 1.150 and were found acceptable.
The Automated UT and Manual UT composite coverage EE 59.3% code credit taken.
Due to the nozzle to vessel weld design it is not feasible volume as defined in Section XI.
P 7 Vlf Br>
Cgug~rirw AITPHZER SCD - Z<a. 8r -ig. re. h9 XC t-ZSD. 7r'L, lA, RCQ jiZ. /A. gC'7 5'7D-8FX Nz. zg.
l('e8S3-SF'>. SF-/Z. fZQ./R to effectively ultrasonically examine 100% of the ASME Code examination Q EXAMCOMPI.ETE ADDIBONALDATASHEETS:
N/A 0 PARTIALLYEXAMINEDIEXPtAININ COMMENTSI Q EXAMcOMI LETE IN COMBINATIONvrITH DATASH S BELOW COMPAREDTO: QPSI NISI REPORTNO/SP EXAMINATIONRESDLTS:
g ACCEPTABLE
~b a~gq
SUMMARY
BY LEVEL DATE RO. OF RECORDABLEINDICAITONS.~
0 NO CHANOE CI I/IIACCEPTAELE NOOFREPOR'/ABLE/NDICATIONSI~
L~a>g DATE GE REVIEWED BY LEVEL DATE ANIIREVIEW PAGE:~ OF:~
F DREE I!TEE/TEV 5
I
Sun Oct 16 16:50:30 1994 2'
. <<GQ,z DATA
SUMMARY
SHEET N4A
&genl Fmry5uclear 2 CyctB 7 Page ~>f~>
Plant:
Browns Ferry Unit 2 Weld ID: N4A Code Category:
B-D Evaluation Level:
50 Relevant Indications:
No Non-Relevant Indications:
Yes
~ Indications Requiring Further Evaluation:
No UT Channel Information:
Active Examination Transducer Orientation Search Unit-Offset Channel Type Angle Angle X
Y 1
2 3
T W
T B
45 0
60 0
-9.1 0.0 7.3 0.0 3.00 0.00
-3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Patch Information:
Patch ID Cal ID Exam Exam Exam Start End Date Examiner Init/Lvl bfn2.n4a.tl bfn2.n4a.tl.1 BF2.BF-18.TPL.1A 17:00 17:20 10/15/94 BF2.BF-18.TPL.1A 05:02 05:08 10/16/94
.:.::.:.':;::;:,:,::::::.',::.',::!,":..;::;::,;,GE, Niicle'ar,Eiier'gy.,::::
EXAMINATION
SUMMARY
SHEET m~T No.:
PROJECT'ROCEDURE'EV~
FRR: ~l N/A SYSTEM'ELD NO.:
REV~ FRR:~
~l CONFIGURATION EXAMINER:
EXAMINER:
EXAMINER:
LPJEL:~t LEVEL:MS LFVEL~~
WELDTYPE Q MT Q PT N UT Q VT Q CIRCUMFERENTIAL Q LONGITUDINAL 8 OTHER DATASHEET NO.(S):
CALSHEET NO.(S):
During the manual ultrasonic examinations of the above referenced weld, no reportable indications were recorded as per ASME Section XI, 1986 Edition, No Addenda, Category B.D welds and Reg.
Guide 1.150.
The Manual UT examinations were performed in accordance with UT-BFN-700VO Rev. 0.
Tho Manual UT 0 reference is located at 3:00.
No recordble indications requiring evaluation per ASME Code Section XI and Reg.
Guide were recorded and were found to be acceptable.
The Manual UT coverage EE 67.8%.
Due to nozzle to vessel weld design it is not feasible to effectively ultrasonically examine 100% of the ASME Code examination volume as defined in Section XI.
8 PARTIALLYEXAMINED(EXPLAININ COMMENTS)
Q EXAM COMPLETE IN COMBINATIONWITH DATASH SBEL W ADDITIONALDATASHEETS:
N/A coMPAREDTo: ElPBI Qlsl REPDRTNO.(SI: N/A N NO CHANGE HO. DF RECOR DANAEINDICAIICNS:~
EXAMINATIONRESULTS:
Q ACCEPTABLE
SUMMARY
BY LEVEL DATE n
..>I=re GE REVIEWED BY LEVEL DATE Q uNACCEPTABLE IIO.DF REFER !AS LE IHDICLIII!HS:~
7l
.S~
~ PAGE:~OF:~
DATE ANIIREVIEW E~VE4IIEV $
C 4
0
EXAMINATION
SUMMARY
SHEET PROJECT:
PROCEDURE:
REV~ FRR:~
~IA SYSTEM:
WELD NO.:
REV~ FRR:~
CONFIGURATION'EV~FRR:~
EXAMINER:
EXAMINER:
EXAMINER:
LEVEL:
II LEVEL:~h LEVEL:~lb WELDTYPE:
QMT QPT WUT QVT Q CIRCUMFERENTIAL Q LONGITUDINAL N OTHER DATASHEET NO.(S):
CALSHEET NO.(S):
During the manual ultrasonic inner radius examinations of the above referenced wold, no reportable indications wore recorded as per ASME Section XI, 1986 Edition, No Addenda, CategorY B-D welds.
The Manual UT examinations wore performed in accordance with UT-BFN-703VO Rev. 0.
The Manual UT reference is located at 3:00.
No indications requiring evaluation according to ASME Cede Section XI were recorded The Manual UT coverage ~ 73%.
0 PARTIALLYEXAMINEDIEXPLAININ COMMENTS)
Q EXAM COMPLETE IN COMBINATIONWITH A
SH ETS BELOW ADDITIONALDATASHEETS:
N/A COMPAREDTO: QPSI NISI REPORTNO.ISI: N/A EXAMINATIONRESULTS:
g ACCEPTABLE RD. OF RECORDABAEIRDICAIIORB:~
0 NO CHANOE 0 DRAOCEFFABLE RO.OFREFORFABLEIROICABORE~
SUMMARY
BY E REVIEWED BY LO-XK-'L LEVEL DATE ro-2b 9I LEVEL DATE UTILITYREVIEW ANIIREVIEW I~d-Al - +
DATE U-]c'A'ATE PAGE:~OF:~
I
~
~
ii:i.'.":i.'?:."'ll,".ii:.':D',ill;I,",'.".".":I~.'IED,":~g:+~igaia~'N
/
.:::-,.;::,.,:::::::::::.:;-:::::-:::.':;:::.-':--,:GE.:Nuclei'i'Eiieigy.:
EXAMINATION
SUMMARY
SHEET
~RT No.:
F-PROJECT'ROCEDURE:
TLEV~ FRTD~
N/A SYSTEM:
WELD NO.:
CONFIGURATION'EEV~
FRR:~
LEEV~I FRTD~
EXAMINER:
EXAMINER EXAMINER'EVEL:
II LEVEL:~
LEVEL:~
WELDTYPE:
QMT QPT NUT VT Q CIRCUMFERENTIAL Q LONGITUDINAL N OTHER DATASHEET NO.(S):
CALSHEET NO.(S):
pic &rE During the Automated and Manual ultrasonic examinations of tho above referenced weld, no roportablo indications were recorded as per ASME Section XI, 1986 Edition, No Addenda, Category B.D welds and Reg. Guide 1.150.
Automated UT examinations were performed in accordance with UT-BFN-702VO Rev. O. The Manual UT examinations were performed in accordance UT-BFN-300VO Rev. 0.
Automated UT examinations were resuictod due to insulation.
Tho Manual UT 604 T-scan and 04 base metal examinations were restricted due to the insulation.
'he GERIS 2000 OD automated UT system and Manual UT 04 reference is located at 3:00.
The GERIS system recorded tho following nonrelevant indications:
04 L-wave entry surface noise 454 T-scan
- clad noise, nozzle bore geometry. elecuical noise 60 T-scan
- entry surface noise, nozzle bore geometry, electrical noise 45o T-scan ODBR - entry surface noise, nozzle bore geometry 604 T-scan ODBR - entry surface noise, nozzle bore geometry 45 P-scan - clad noise 60'.scan
- entry surface noise These nonrelevant indications were flagged and excluded from tho final reports.
60o T-scan indications were recorded requiring evaluation por Reg. Guide 1.150 and were found acceptable.
The Automated UT and Manual UT composite coverage
~ 52.1% code credit taken.
Duo to the nozzle to vessel wold design it is not feasible to volume as defined in Section XI.
St')rA-8F >
Ctcid4friv~ &~SEW)'0 r>-f-f/g
~- BFl. 8F-/8.IPg, IIR
~C - SF'.
VPL
. IR. /t'c / /
~7- ~a. vrL,I8. Ress gag-Z<P. NC,./IA. RC/4 r79-8 ~..pc,.za. pc/7 effectively ultrasonicaliy examine 100% of the ASME Code examination gg~
Z<>g. 8~ -gS'. raR. t4 S t8'- 8=a. FJR.i4. gc/5 5 9P - 8F'g,78/, I8, A'<~<
N PARTIALLYEXAMINEDIEXPLAINrN COMMENTS)
Q EXAMCOMPLETE ADDITIONALDATASHEETS:
N/A Q EXAM COMPLETE IN COMBINATIONWITH DATASN S BELOW Ntt. OF RECORDABLE INDICATIONB~
Q NO CHANGE I COMPAREDTO: QPSI NISI REPORTNO.IS): N/A EXAMINATIONRESULTS:
N ACCEPTABLE O IIIIACCEFTABLEI NO OFREFDRTABLBINDICATIONB~
t L. t tNN gL(
UMMARYBY LEVEL DATE
/+/1/J
~.
/~o-av-9 GE REVIEWED BY LEVEL DATE UTILITYREVIEW ANIIREVIEW II~F-2I-DATE l~l-I I DATE PAGE:~OF:~5
~5Q 4tt it% $
Sat Oct 22 14:38:05 1994 <78 c=-=-~g DATA
SUMMARY
SHEET Plant:
Browns Ferry Unit 2 Weld ID: N2B Code Category:
B-D Evaluation Level:
50 Relevant Indications:
No Non-Relevant Indications:
Yes Indications Requiring Further Evaluation:
No N2B rowns Ferry Nuclear 2 Cycle 7 Page ~>f <~
UT Channel Information:
Active Channel Examination Transducer Type Angle Orientation Search Unit-Offset Angle X
Y 1
2 3
T W
T B
45 0
60 0
-9,4 0.0 7.5 0.0 3.00 0.00
-3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Patch Information:
Patch ID Cal ID Exam Exam Exam Start End Date Examiner Init/Lvl bfn2.n2b.tl bfn2.n2b.tl.1 BF2.BF-18.TPL.1A 09:55 10:27 10/22/94 BF2.BF-18.TPL.1A 10:35 10:49 10/22/94
"??:.:.'!TED.: ~IIP!!:i,'ll: ':;:ll':i:.i!i?.'iii'A:iiii!I?!!E~
-.,-::.:::::.::'.:::::;::::~'::::,;;:GE::Nii'Cleir-Eri eigy.I:
EXAMINATION
SUMMARY
SHEET REPORT NO.:
PROJECT'YSTEM:
WELD NO.:
PROCEDURE:
REV~ ERR:~l NIA
~l TEEEF~
FREE:~
~l CONFIGURATION'XAMINER'XAMINER'XAMINER:
o DATASHEET NO,(S):
LEVEL:
E F FF LEVEL:~l LEysL,~
EEELET TYPE'AL SHEET NO.(S):
+5't/O~
~< PT 8 UT 0VT CIRCUMFERENTIAL LONGITUDINAL N OTHER Ouring the Automated and Manual ultrasonic examinations of the above referenced weld, no reportable indications were recorded as per ASME Section XI, 1986 Edition, No Addenda, Category B.D welds and Reg. Guide 1.150.
Automated UT examinations were performed in accordance with UT-BFN-702VQ Rev. O. The Manual UT examinations were performed in accordance UT-BFN-300VO Rev. 0.
Automated UT 60 T.scan and 0'ase metal examinations were restricted due to the insulation.
The Manual UT 60 T-scan and 0 base metal examinations were restricted due to the insulation.
The GERIS 2000 OD automated UT system and Manual UT 0'eference is located at 3:00.
The GERIS system recorded the'following nonrelevant indications:
O'-wave
- entry surface noise 45 T-scan
- entry surface noise, cladnoise 60 T-scan
- entry surface noise, nozzle bore geometry 45 T-scan ODBR - entry surface noise, nozzle bore geometry 60'-scan OOBR - entry surface noise, nozzle bore geometry, electrical noise 45 P-scan - clad noise, nozzle geometry 604 P-scan - entry surface noise, electrical noise These nonrelevant indications were flagged and excluded from the final reports.
604 T-scan indications were recorded requiring evaluation per ASME Code Section XI and Reg. Guide 1.150 and were found acceptable.
The Automated UT and Manual UT composite coverage
~ 54.7% code credit taken.
Due to the nozzle to vessel weld design it is not feasible to effectively ultrasonically examine 100% of the ASME Code examination volume as defined in Section XI.
k'7'-8F>
~c rrTrgb'a
~~mcWS 5'Coo
/F3 Qr - / P.7PL. I/I X~3-ZF~~. 8F-Jg, 7aa. /A s'1( - 8Q.v8p.p p~ g S'7$ - o~>.7&L. IA. Rr-/3 597-8'r"g. 738, IH.le<3
~C - 8/->
i'd<. /R, ECIQ Q EXAMCOMPLETE 8 PARTIALLYEXAMINEDIEXPLAININ COMMENTS) iQ EXAM COMPLETE IN COMBINATIONWITH DATASHE S BELOW ADDITIONALDATASHEETS:
WA COMPAREDTO:
PEPSI NISI REPORT NO.IS): N/A
,PJVWINATIONRESULTS:
Q ACCEPTABLE RO. OFRECOROABIE IIIOCAOCRB~
D No CHANGE Q URACCEFTABIE RO OFRFPCRTABIBIROCATKIRR~
SUMMARY
BY LEVEL DATE CE REVIEWED BY gr.r-LEVEL DATE ANIIREVIEW l~o-2
~
DATE DATE PAGE:~OF:~
10EBE Uf4IICY S
j I
Fri Oct 21 12: 56: 32 1994 DATA
SUMMARY
SHEET Plant:
Browns Ferry Unit 2 Weld ID: N2F Code Category:
B-D Evaluation Level:
50 Relevant Indications:
No Non-Relevant Indications:
Yes Indications Requiring Further Evaluation:
No N2F P8g8 2'M 3"
"-'rogans Ferry Nuclear 2 Cycle 7 Page
~~f UT Channel Information:
Active Examination Transducer Channel Type Angle Orientation Search Unit-Offset Angle X
1 2
3 4
T W
T B
45 0
60 0
-9.4 0.0 7.5 0.0 3.00 0.00
-3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Patch Information:
Cal ID Exam Exam Exam Start End Date Examiner Init/Lvl bfn2.n2f.tl bfn2.n2f.tl.1 BF2
~ BF-18. TPL. 1A 05: 15 05: 46 10/21/94 BF2.BF-18. TPL. 1A 05: 55 06: 14 10/21/9
I lk I
P
.:,:-':::.":,GF,:Nu'cle'ai EiieITgy....':
7 EXAMINATlON
SUMMARY
SHEET PROJECT'YSTEM:
WELD NO.:
CONFIGURATION'XAMINER:
EXAMINER:
EXAMINER'EVEL:
~)I
~
LEVEL:JL PROCEDURE:
WEED TYPE REV~ FRR: ~I
~IA
~I REY~ FRR:~
FRR:~
~f PMT PPT RUT PVT P CIRCUMFERENTIAL P LONGITUDINAL 0 OTHER DATASHEET NO.(S):
AfaUQip CALSHEET NO.(S):
WSed Akn.Z'uring the Automated and Manual ultrasonic examinations of the above referenced weld, no reportable indications were recorded as per ASME Section XI, 1986 Edition, No Addenda, Category B-D welds and Reg. Guide 1.150.
Automated UT examinations were performed in accordance with UT-BFN-702VO Rev. O. The Manual UT examinations were performed in accordance UT-BFN.300VO Rev. 0.
Automated UT 60'T-scans and 0 base metal examinations were restricted due to the insulation.
The Manual UT 60 T-scan and 0 base metal examinations were restricted due to the insulation.
The GERIS 2000 OD automated UT system and Manual UT 0'eference is located at 3:00.
The GERIS system recorded the following nonrelevant indications:
0 L-wave entry surface noise 45 T-scan N/A 604 T-scan
- entry surface noise, nozzle bore geometry 45 T-scan ODBR - entry surface noise, clad noise, nozzle bore geometry 604 T-scan ODBR - entry surface noise, nozzle bore geometry 454 P-scan - clad noise 60'-scan-N/A These nonrelevant indications were flagged and excluded from the final reports.
604 T-scan indications were recorded requiring evaluation per ASME Code Section XI and Reg. Guide 1.150 and were found acceptable.
The Automated UT and Manual UT composite coverage
~ 54.7% code credit taken.
Due to the nozzle to vessel weld design it is not feasible to volume as defined in Section XI.
+ TITF+- g/=W CgAFa'RZTro~
W<<mITRFPS SbD - 8F>. 8F-/S.~A../A SE3
- 8') BF./g 78A? /g 5"73,- 8F&. Wg g3, gC//
8'7V-m~..pz.iA. EC iX effectively ultrasonically examine 100% of the ASME Code examination u I'-'f9 4~7 - ZF~.mp.M. RCi~
S VII'- 8r.2. 788. /R. /PC/$
Q EXAMCOMPLETE AOOITIONALCATASHEETS:
NIA 5 PARTIALLYEXAMINED(EXPLAININ COMMENTS)
EXAM COMPLETE IN COMSINATIONWITH OATA SH ETS 8ELOW coMPARED To: P Psl g Isl REPCRT Noksl: N/A EXAMINATIONREsuLTS:
5 ACCEPTABLE P NO CHANOE p uNACCEPTASLE MO. OF R ECOR OAR LE I MOI CATE! MS:~
MO.CF REFORTAELE IMIIICATIOMR~
E-to-lt>~~
SUMMARY
BY LEVEL DATE IA
~jo QF rr GE REVIEWED BY LEVEL DATE
.S~~
IE~~~
LITYREVIEW DATE Il~~~
PAGE:~OF: ~~
FCFOEVTMTFECM T
I'4
Thu Oct 20 09: 51:28 1994~ <="
DATA
SUMMARY
SHEET Plant:
Browns Ferry Unit 2 Weld ID: N2J Code Category:
B-D Evaluation Level:
50 Relevant Indications:
No Non-Relevant Indications:
Yes Indications Requiring Further Evaluation:
No N
-"-Page-k-o Browns Ferry Nuclear 2 Cycle 7 Page ~+f UT Channel Information:
Active Examination Transducer Orientation Search Unit-Offset Channel Type Angle Angle X
Y 2
3 4
T W
T B
45 0
60 0
-9.4 0.0 7.5 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Patch Information:
Patch ID Cal ID Exam Exam Exam Start End Date Examiner Init/Lvl bfn2.n2j.tl BF2.BF-18. TPL. 1A 06: 06 06:40 10/20/94 O~ig
'!.'O'I!i".:'I:-"':>":lI'Fi'!:::!i,:'3l,,'.I::!TGE::NiileiiEri e'r'gji':."'.'XAMINATION
SUMMARY
SHEET PROJECT'ROCEDURE'EIE~
FRR: ~f
~l SYSTEM'lELD NO.:
REIT~ FRR:~
CONFIGURATION'EIN~FRR:~
EXAMINER'XAMINER:
EXAMINER:
LEVEL: Iiiii LEVEL:~
LEVEL:Jl WELDTYPE:
QMT QPT NUT PVT P CIRCUMFERENTIAL Q LONGITUDINAL II OTHER DATASHEET NO.(S):
CALSHEET NO.(S):
4'so ATE During the Automated and Manual ultrasonic examinations of the above referenced weld, no reportable indications were recorded as per ASME Section XI, 1986 Edition, No Addenda, Category B-D welds and Reg. Guide 1.150.
Automated UT examinations were performed in accordance with UT-BFN-702VO Rev. O. The Manual UT examinations were performed in accordance UT-BFN-300VO Rev. 0.
~:
Automated UT and the Manual UT examinations were restricted due to insulation support ring. The 60 T-scan Manual UT examinations were restricted due to insulation support ring.
The GERIS 2000 OD automated UT system and Manual UT 04 reference is located at 3:00.
The GERIS system recorded the following nonrelevant indications:
O'-wave nozzle ID geometry 45 T-scan nozzle bore geometry 604 T-scan
- nozzle bore geometry 454 T-scan ODBR - entry surface noise, nozzle bore geometry, electrical noise 60'-scan ODBR - entryr surface noise, nozzle bore geometry 45'-scan - clad noise 60'-scan - entry surface noise These nonrelevant indications were flagged and excluded from the final reports.
604 T-scan indications were recorded requiring evaluation per ASME Code Section XI and Reg. Guide 1.150 and were found acceptable.
The Automated UT and Manual UT composite coverage RE 52.5% code credit taken.
Due to the nozzle to vessel weld design it is not feasible to effectively ultrasonically examine 1009o of the ASME Code examination volume as defined in Section XI.
El'0 Cdr.rrrggyi~ PsF+8sTAS + +9'I
<co- @pe. gr zp.-,pq gg SVZ-Srz. raP.e, geg s7I - gran, var
. ~R. Rc 9 M~- ~4. Md, lg. +Cip EF~.7Pr-. iA, ID S II~ - END. P. I4 r 8'R. Jg Q EXAMCOMPLETE 0 PARTIALLYEXAMINEDIEXPLAININ COMMENTS)
P EXAMCOMPLETE IN COMBINATIONWITH DATASHE S BELOW ADDITIONALDATASHEETS:
N/A coMPAREDTD: QPsl Nlsl REPDRTNo.is): N/A EXAMINATIONRESULTS:
g ACCEPTABLE Q NOCHANOE p UNACCEPTABLE NO. OF REOOROABIEINOIOATIONE~
NO. OF REFER TABIEINOIEATIONE~
sUM Y BY LEVEL DATE fl R
FAT- '>5-Qr GE REVIEWED BY LEVEL DATE B
UTILITYREVIEW ANIIREVIEW lo-2QQ DATE If-I:~ktI.
DATE PAGE:~OF:~
FORE IR44 RSV. $
0
Wed Oct 19 10:11:29 1994'~ ~~ ~~.Ga Browns Ferry Nuclear 2 Cycle 7 DATA
SUMMARY
HEET Page ~>f <"
Plant:
Browns Ferry Unit 2 Weld ID: N5A Code Category:
B-D Evaluation Level:
50 Relevant Indications:
No Non-Relevant Indications:
Yes Indications Requiring Further Evaluation:
No f 3 UT Channel Xnformation:
Active Examination Transducer Channel Type Angle Orientation Search Unit-Offset Angle X
Y 1
2.
3 T
W T
B 45 0
60 0
-10.5 0.0 8.2 0.0 3.00 0.00
-3.00 0.00
- 0. 00, 0.00 0.00 0.00 Patch Information:
Cal ID Exam Exam Exam Start End Date Examiner Init/Lvl bfn2.n5a.tl BF2.BF-18.TPL.1A 22:55 23:30 10/17/94
V
GE NUCLEARENERGY UTEXAMINATION
SUMMARY
SHEET i)010 3 REPORT NO:~Qg~g PROJECT WELD ID:
SYSTEM:
BFN RFO 9 N1B Nozzle-to-Vessel Weld RPV Recirculation Outlet INITIALCALIBRATIONID:
CALIBRATION VERIFICATiONS'INAL CALIBRATIONID:
MANUAL CALIBRATION'ANUAL DATA'OZ.1.INRC, TBR2.RC RC1.INIT, TBR1.INIT, N1B.TPL.1, N1B.TBR.1 - N1B.TBR.2 NOZ.1.OUT CG97-03, -04,-05, -06, -07, -22, -23 DG97-02, -03, -08 Ultrasonic examination results were acceptable to the requirements of ASME B&PVC Section XI, 1989 Edition No Addenda, Category B-D welds and USNRC Reg Guide 1.150 Revision 1 (Alternative Method).
Automated 0, 2.25 MHz Weld and Base Metal, 45'/60'S, 1.0 MHz Transverse and Parallel scans were performed in accordance with procedure UT-BFN-702 V1 Revision 0.
Limited automated scanning was performed due to: 1) Nozzle configuration and 2). Biological Shield Wall obstruction.
Supplemental manual O'L 2.25 MHz Base Metal; 45'/60' 1.0 Mhz Transverse and Parallel; and 70'L 2.0 Mhz Transverse scans examinations were performed in accordance with procedure UT-BFN-300V2 Revision 0 to examine areas not scanned with the automated system.
The GERIS 2000 OD automated UT system and Manual UT 0'eference is located at 3:00 o'clock.
The GERIS 2000 OD system recorded the following non-relevant indications:
O'eld Metal
- entry surface O'ase Metal
- entry surface 45'ransverse
- clad, Nozzle bore, electrical, entry surface 60'ransverse
- clad, Nozzle bore, electrical, entry surface 45'arallel
- clad, entry surface, electrical 60'arallel
- clad, entry surface, electrical These non-relevant indications were flagged and excluded from the final report.
The GERIS 2000 OD system recorded the following relevant indications:
O'eld Metal O'ase Metal 45'ransverse 60'ransverse 45'arallel cw 60'arallel cw 45'arallel ccw 60'arallel ccw
)20% DAC 0
n/a 17 9
0 0
0 0
50% DAC 0
n/a 1
0 0
0 0
0 Indication with loss of BE n/a 0
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a No other indications requiring evaluation according to ASME B&PVC Section XI or USNRC Reg Guide 1.150 Revision 1 (Alternative Method) were recorded.
Ifindications were flagged by the GERIS 2000 Analysis System as requiring further evaluation, the indications have been further evaluated and the evaluation is attached.
Automated and manual UT Composite Coverage = 71.6%
Note '
Transducer failures after calibration recheck, reference calibration sheet for explanation.
p-nA P
EPARED BY DATE GE UT Level II SUMNV.DOC REVIEWED BY DATE //-]8'-')7 GE UT Level III UTILITYREVIEW A I'i'l1 ANIIREVIEW /J I DATE BROSNS FERRY R9 PAGf I
OF~<
~
~
( Qt
Wed Oct '15'0:49:51 1997
-Qo 7 N1B Page 1 of 6
DATA
SUMMARY
SHEET 00104 Plant:
Browns Ferry Unit 2 Weld ID: N1B Code Edition: 1989 edition Code Category:
B-D Evaluation Level:
20 Relevant Indications:
Yes Non-Relevant Indications:
Yes Indications Requiring Further Evaluation:
No UT'Channel Information:
Active Examination Transducer Orientation Search Unit-Offset Channel Type Angle Angle X
Y 1
2 3'
T
~
T B
0 45 60 0
0.0
-5.3 4.6 0.0 0.00 3.00
-3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
'-'i.'atch Information:
Patch ID ','-
-.. 'al ID Exam Exam Exam Examiner Start End Date
'nit/Lvl nlb.tl.l 1 NOZ.1.INRC 06:23 07:35 09/29/97g~
BROSNS FERRf R9 PAGE
kf r.p I
dl
GE NUCLEARENERGY UTEXAMINATION
SUMMARY
SHEET 00297 REPORT NO~~5 PROJECT WELD ID'YSTEM:
BFN Cycle 9 N2A Nozzle-to-Vessel Weld RPV Recirculation Inlet INITIALCALIBRATIONID:
CALIBRATIONVERIFICATIONS:
FINALCALIBRATIONID:
MANUAL CALIBRATION'ANUAL DATA:
NOZ.1.IN RC RC1.INITJ, 2C.TPL.3, N2A.TPL.1, N2A.TPL.2 NOZ.1.0lJT CG97-24, 25, 26, 27 DG97-09 Ultrasonic examination results were acceptable to the requirements of ASME B8PVC Section XI, 1989 Edition No Addenda, Category 8-D welds and USNRC Reg Guide 1.150 Revision 1 (Alternative Method).
Automated 0', 2.25 MHz Weld and Base Metal, 45'/60'S, 1.0 MHz Transverse and Parallel scans were performed in accordance with procedure UT-BFN-702 V1 Revision 0.
Limited automated scanning was performed due to: 1) Nozzle configuration and 2). Insulation Support obstructions
. Supplemental manual O'L 2.25 MHz Base Metal; 45'/60' 1.0 Mhz Transverse and Parallel; and 70'L 2.0 Mhz Transverse scans examinations were performed in accordance with procedure UT-BFN-300V2 Revision 0 to examine areas not scanned with the automated system.
The GERIS 2000 OD automated UT system and Manual UT0'eference is located at 3:00 o'lock.
The GERIS 2000 OD system recorded the following non-relevant indications:
O'eld Metal O'ase Metal 45'ransverse 60'ransverse 45'arallel 60'arallel
- entry surface, clad
- entry surface
- clad, electrlcai, entry surface, nozzle bore
- clad, electrical, entry surface
- dad, entry surface, electrical
- clad, entry surface, electrical, shear redirect These non-relevant indications were flagged and excluded from the final report.
The GERIS 2000 OD system recorded the following relevant indications:
O'eld Metal O'ase Metal 45'ransverse 60'ransverse 45'arallel cw 60'arallel cw 45'arallel ccw 60'arallel ccw
>20% DAC 0
n/a 0
2 0
0 0
0
>50% DAC 0
n/a 0
0 0
0 0
0 Indication with loss of BE n/a 0
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a No other indications requiring evaluation according to ASME B&PVC Section XI or USNRC Reg Guide 1.150 Revision 1 (Alternative Method) were recorded.
Ifindications were flagged by the GERIS 2000 Analysis System as requiring further evaluation, the indications have been further evaluated and the evaluation is attached.
Automated and manual UT Composite Coverage = 77% (Does not include 70')
C PREPARED BY DATE GE UT Level II SUMNV.DOC (o t71$
C ~
/IIir70 REVIEWED BY DATE GE UT Level III UTILITYREVIEW
~
~
ANIIREVIEW DATEI~
BRONNS FERRY R ~
PAGE~Of
wed Oct 15 11:48:55 1997 DATA
SUMMARY
. SHEET N2A Page 1 of 6
iJ 0298 Plant:
Browns Ferry Unit 2 Weld ID: N2A Code Edition: 1989 edition-No-Addenda Code Category:
B-D Evaluation Level:
20 Relevant Indications:
Yes Non-Relevant Indications:
Yes Indications Requiring Further Evaluation:
No UT Channel Information:
Active Channel Examination Transducer T~e Angle Orientation Search Unit-Offset Angle X
Y 1
2 3
4 W
T T
B 0
45 60 0
0.0
-9.4 7.5 0.0 0.00 3.00
-3.00 0.00 h
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 h-Patch Information:"
~"
Patch ID F
Cal ID Exam
. Exam Exam
'xaminer.'tart End Date
Init/Lvl n2a.tl.4 1
n2a.tl.5 1
n2a.tl.3 1
NOZ.1.INRC NOZ.1.INRC NOZ.1.INRC 07:37 07:48 10/03/97 14:31 15:02 10/03/9 06:34 06:44 10/03/97 BROWNS FERRY PAGE pF
i~F.
"i~
V
PROJECT WELD!D:
SYSTEM:
GE NUCLEARENERGY UT EXAM/NAT/ON
SUMMARY
SHEET BFN Cycle 9 N2C Nozzle-to-Vessel Weld RPV Recirculation Inlet
~
tjo24i REPORT NO:~~~
INITIALCALIBRATION ID'ALIBRATION VERIFICATIONS:
FINALCALIBRATIONID:
MANUALCALIBRATION:
MANUAL DATA'OZ.1.INRC RC1.INITJ 2G.TPL.3, N2C.TPL.1, N4F.TPL.1, N2C.TPL.4 NOZ.1.0 T
CG97-12, -13, -14, -15 DG97-05 Ultrasonic examination results were acceptable to the requirements ofASME B&PVC Section XI, 1989 Edition No Addenda, Category B-D welds and USNRC Reg Guide 1.150 Revision 1 (Alternative Method).
Automated 0, 2.25 MHz Weld and Base Metal, 45'/60'S, 1.0 MHz Transverse and Parallel scans were performed in accordance with procedure UT-BFN-702 V1 Revision 0.
Limited automated scanning was performed due to: 1) Nozzle configuration and 2). Insulation Support obstructions
. Supplemental manual O'L 2.25 MHz Base Metal; 45'/60' 1.0 Mhz Transverse and Parallel; and 70'L 2.0 Mhz Transverse scans examinations were performed in accordance with procedure UT-BFN-300V2 Revision 0 to examine areas not scanned with the automated system.
The GERIS 2000 OD automated UT system and Manual UT 0'eference is located at 3:00 o'lock.
The GERIS 2000 OD system recorded the following non-relevant indications:
O'eld Metal O'ase Metal 45 Transverse 60'ransverse 45'arallel 60'arallel
- entry surface
- entry surface
- clad, electrical, entry surface, nozzle bore
- ctad, electrical, entry surface, nozzle bore
- clad, entry surface, electrical
- dad, entry surface, electrical These non-relevant indications were flagged and excluded from the final report.
The GERIS 2000 OD system recorded the following relevant indications:
O'eld Metal O'. Base Metal 45'ransverse 60'ransverse 45'arallel cw 60'arallel cw 45'arallel ccw 60'arallel ccw
)20% DAC 0'/a 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
>50% DAC 0
n/a 0
0 0
0 0
0 Indication with loss of BE n/a 0
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a No other indications requiring evaluation according to ASME B&PVC Section XI or USNRC Reg Guide 1.150 Revision 1 (Alternative Method) were recorded.
Ifindications were flagged by the GERIS 2000 Analysis System as requiring further evaluation, the indications have been further evaluated and the evaluation is attached.
Automated and manual UT Composite Coverage = 77% (Does not include 70')
P EPARED BY DATE GE UT Level II lo I"r'lf REVIEWED BY DATE GE UT Leve1 III UTILTY REVIEW DATE ANIIREVIEW
'""l@ + 9 SUMNV.DOC BROIVNS FERRY R
PAGE I
OF
~
~
,Pri Oct 10 07:33:07 1997 DATA
SUMMARY
SHEET
'-2oP N2C Page of 25 00~<>
Plant:
Browns Ferry Unit 2 Weld ID: N2C Code Edition:
1989 edition Code Category:
B-D Evaluation Level:
20 Relevant Indications:
No Non-Relevant Indications:
Yes Indications Requiring Further Evaluation:
No I
UT Channel Information:
Active Examination Transducer Channel Type Angle Orientation Search Unit-Offset Angle X
Y 1
2 3
4 W
T T
B 0'5 60 0
0.0
-9.4 7.5 0.0 0.00 3.00
-3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t
Patch Information:
j, g,h Patch'D'. '.;.'al ID'. Exam'.. Exam Exam Start End Date
.. Examiner Init/Lvl n2c.tl.1 1
n2c.tl.7 1
NOZ.1
~ INRC NOZ.1.INRC 17:24 17:36 10/01/97 03:12 03:43 10/08/97 +~~
BRO'LYNS FERRY PAGE
~
Dp
P, 4
tg
GE NUCLEARENERGY UTEXAMINATION
SUMMARY
SHEET PROJECT BFN Cycle 9 WELD ID:
N2G Nozzle-to-Vessel Weld SYSTENl:
RPV Recirculation Inlet
~
00174 REPORT NO:~~~
INITIALCALIBRATIONID:
CALIBRATION VERIFICATIONS'INAL CALIBRATIONID:
MANUALCALIBRATION:
INANUALDATA:
NOZ.1. INRC RC1.INIT, N2G TPL.1, N2G.TPL.2, N2G.TPL.3, N2C.TPL.1 NOZ.1.OU.T CG97-08, -09, -10,.-11, -20, -21, DG97-04, -07 Ultrasonic examination results were acceptable to the requirements ofASME B8PVC Section XI, 1989 Edition No Addenda, Category B-D welds and USNRC Reg Guide 1.150 Revision 1 (Alternative Method).
Automated 0', 2.25 MHz Weld and Base Metal, 45'/60'S, 1.0 MHzTransverse and Parallel scans were performed in accordance with procedure UT-BFN-702 V1 Revision 0.
Limited automated scanning was performed due to: 1) Nozzle configuration and 2). Insulation Support obstructions
. Supplemental manual O'L 2.25 MHz Base Metal; 45'/60' 1.0 Mhz Transverse and Parallel; and 70'L 2.0 Mhz Transverse scans examinations were performed in accordance with procedure UT-BFN-300V2 Revision 0 to examine areas not scanned with the automated system.
The GERIS 2000 OD automated UT system and Manual UT 0'eference is located at 3:00 o'lock.
The GERIS 2000 OD system recorded the following non-relevant indications:
')
O'eld Metal 0 Base Metal 45'ransverse 60'ransverse 45'arallel 60'arallel
- entry surface
'I
- entry surface, electrical
- clad, electrical, entry surface, nozzle bore
- clad, electrical, entry surface, nozzle bore
- clad, entry surface, electrical
- ciad, entry surface, electrical These non-relevant indications were flagged and excluded from the final report.
The GERIS 2000 OD system recorded the following relevant indications:
O'eld Metal O'ase Metal 45'ransverse 60'ransverse 45'arallel cw 60'arallel cw 45'arallel ccw 60'arallel ccw
>20% DAC 0
n/a 3
5 0
0 0
0
>50% DAC 0
n/a 0
1 0
0 0
0 Indication with loss of BE n/a 0
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a No other indications requiring evaluation according to ASME B&PVC Section XI or USNRC Reg Guide 1.150 Revision 1 (Alternative Method) were recorded.
Ifindications were flagged by the GERIS 2000 Analysis System as requiring further evaluation. the indications have been further evaluated and the evaluation is attached.
Automated and manual UT Composite Coverage = 77% (Does not include 70')
P EPARED BY DATE GE UT Lovel II SUMNV.DOC REVIEWED BY DATE GE UT Level III UTIL REVIEW DATE ANIIREVIEW DATE BROtm/NS FERRY R 9 PAGE~OF
. ~
Hat Oct 4 11:31:47 1997 t
DATA
SUMMARY
SHEET Plant:
Browns Ferry Unit 2 Weld ID: N2G Code Edition: 1989 edition Code Category:
B-D Evaluation Level:
20 Relevant Indications:
Yes Non-Relevant Indications:
Yes Indications Recpxiring Further Evaluation:
No g ~/o N2G Page 1 of 13
~
iJ0172 UT Channel Information:
Active Channel Examination Transducer T~e Angle Orientation Search Unit-Offset Angle X
Y 1
2 3
4 W
T T
B 0
45 60 0
0.0
-9,4 7.5 0.0 0.00 3.00
-3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Patch "Information:
.Patch'ID
. Cal ID Exam
- Exam, Exam,
Examiner
=
Start End Date Init/Lvl
'2g.t1.2 1
n2g.t1.3 1
n2g.tl.l 1
n2g.t1.4 1
n2g.tl.S 1
NOZ.1.INRC NOZ.1.INRC NOZ.1.INRC NOZ.1.INRC NOZ.1.INRC 22:27 22:50 21:52 11:59 16:13 22:47 22: 58 22:10 12:07 16:21 09/30/97 ~44. K 09/30/97 09/30/97 10/01/97 10/01/97 BROWNS FERRY PAGE OF~
O'O'A E.
P C
llÃ
GE NUCLEARENERGY UT EXAMINATION
SUMMARY
SHEET REPORT NO:g~~
N2H Nozzle-to-Vessel Weld SYSTEM:
RPV Recirculation Inlet INITIALCALIBRATIONID:
CALIBRATION VERIFICATIONS'INAL CALIBRATIONID:
MANUALCALIBRATION:
MANUALDATA:
NOZ.1.INR RC1.INITJP12A.TPL.2, N2H.TPL.1 NOZ.1.0lh CG97-16, -17, -18,.-19 DG97-06 Ultrasonic examination results were acceptable to the requirements of ASME B&PVC Section XI, 1989 Edition No Addenda, Category B-D welds and USNRC Reg Guide 1.150 Revision 1 (Alternative Method).
Automated 0', 2.25 MHz Weld and Base Metal, 45'/60'S, 1.0 MHz Transverse and Parallel scans were performed in accordance with procedure UT-BFN-702 V1 Revision 0.
Limited automated scanning was performed due to: 1) Nozzle configuration and 2). Insulation Support obstructions
. Supplemental manual O'L 2.25 MHz Base Metal; 45'/60' 1.0 Mhz Transverse and Parallel; and 70'L 2.0 Mhz Transverse scans examinations were performed in accordance with procedure UT-BFN-300V2 Revision 0 to examine areas not scanned with the automated system.
The GERIS 2000 OD automated UT system and Manual UT 0'eference is located at 3:00 o'lock.
The GERIS 2000 OD system recorded the following non-relevant indications:
0 Weld Metal O'ase Metal 45'ransverse 60'ransverse 45'arallel 60'arallel
- entry surface, clad
- entry surface
- clad, electrical, entry surface
- ciad, electrical, entry surface, nozzle bore
- ctad, entry surface, electrical
- cIad, entry surface, electrical, shear redirect These non-relevant indications were flagged and exduded from the final report.
The GERIS 2000 OD system recorded the following relevant indications:
O'eld Metal O'ase Metal 45'ransverse 60'ransverse 45'arallel cw 60'arallel cw 45'arallel ccw 60'arallel ccw
>20% DAC 0
n/a 0
0 0
0 0
0
>50% DAC 0
n/a 0
0 0
0 0
0 Indication with loss of BE n/a 0
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a No other indications requiring evaluation according to ASME B&PVC Section XI or USNRC Reg Guide 1.150 Revision 1 (Alternative Method) were recorded.
Ifindications were flagged by the GERIS 2000 Analysis System as requiring further evaluation, the indications have been further evaluated and the evaluation is attached.
Automated and manual UT Composite Coverage = 77% (Does not include 70')
REPARED BY DATE GE UT Lovol II l0- I7. I7.
~iy,ij' REVIEWED BY DATE GE UT Lovel III I,i,64 UTI ITY REVIEW
'"" Ii"W'I'I ANIIREVIEW DATE 12.
SUMNV.DOC BROWNS fERRy R0 PAGE i
OF
e I
'k Wi P
Zhu Oct 16 11:12:02 1997 DATA
SUMMARY
SHEET
'g-8-(I N2H Page 1 of 3 00354 Plant:
Browns Ferry Unit 2 Weld ID: N2H
,Code Edition: 1989 edition-No-Addenda Code Category:
B-D Evaluation Level:
20 Relevant Indications:
No Non-Relevant Indications:
Yes Indications Requiring Further Evaluation:
No UT Channel Information:
Active Channel Examination Transducer Orientation Type Angle Angle Search Unit-Offset K
Y 1
2 3
4 W
T T
B 0
45 60 0
0.0
-9.4 7.5 0.0 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.00
-3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 C
Patch Information:
r Patch ID Cal, ID ;."
Exam 'xam.
Exam Start End
. Date Examiner-
- Init/Lvl n2h.t1.1 1
n2h.t1.2 1
n2h.t1.3 1
n2h.t1.4 2
n2h.tl.5 2
NOZ.1.INRC NOZ.1.INRC NOZ.1.INRC NOZ.1.INRC NOZ.1.INRC 22: 01 01:25 01 45 07:23 07:42 22: 19 01:32 01 54 07:34 07:51 10/03/97~
10/04/97 10/04/97 10/04/9 10/04/9
, 0 BROWNS FERRY RF PAGE OF~'
4 ~
k x gA I
GE NUCLEARENERGY UTEXAMINATION
SUMMARY
SHEET REPORT NO:URGE~
N3B Nozzle-to-Vessel Weld SYSTEM:
RPV Main Steam r1 INITIALCALIBRATIONID:
CALIBRATION VERIFICATIONS'INAL CALIBRATION ID'ANUAL CALIBRATION'ANUALDATA'OZ.1.INR RC1.INIT$ N2G.TPL.3, N2C.TPL.1, N4F.TPL.1, N2C.TPL.4 NOZ.1.Oh CG97-59, -60, -61, -62, -63, -88, -89 DG97-22, -23, A1 Ultrasonic examination results were acceptable to the requirements ofASME B8PVC Section XI, 1989 Edition No Addenda, Category B-D welds and USNRC Reg Guide 1.150 Revision 1 (Alternative Method).
Automated 0', 2.25 MHzWeld and Base Metal, 45'/60'S, 1.0 MHzTransverse and Parallel scans were performed in accordance with procedure UT-BFN-702 V1 Revision 0.
Limited automated scanning was performed due to: 1) Nozzle configuration and 2) Flange obstructions
. Supplemental manual O'L 2.25 MHz Base Metal; 45'/60' 1.0 Mhz Transverse and Parallel; and 70'L 2.0 Mhz Transverse scans examinations were performed in accordance with procedure UT-BFN-300V2 Revision 0 to examine areas not scanned with the automated system.
The GERIS 2000 OD automated UT system and Manual UT 0'eference is located at 3:00 o'lock.
The GERIS 2000 OD system recorded the following non-relevant indications:
O'eld Metal O'ase Metal 45'ransverse 60'ransverse 45'arallel 60'arallel
- entry surface
- entry surface
- dad, electrical, entry surface, nozzle bore
- dad, electrical, entry surface, nozzle bore
- clad, entry surface, electrical
- dad, entry surface, electrical These non-relevant indications were flagged and excluded from the final report.
The GERIS 2000 OD system recorded the following relevant indications:
O'eld Metal O'ase Metal 45'ransverse 60'ransverse 45'arallel cw 60'arallel cw 45'arallel ccw 60'arallel ccw
)20% DAC 0
n/a 0
0 0
0 0
0
)50% DAC 0
n/a 0
0 0
0 0
0 Indication with loss of BE n/a 0
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a No other indications requiring evaluation according to ASME B&PVC Section XI or USNRC Reg Guide 1.150 Revision 1 (Alternative Method) were recorded.
Ifindications were flagged by the GERIS 2000 Analysis System as requiring further evaluation, the indications have been further evaluated and the evaluation is attached.
Automated and manual UT Composite Coverage = 75.2% (Does not include 70')
P EPARED BY DATE GE UT Level II err@
REVIEWED BY DATE I/ -/5- //7 GE UT Level III UTILITYREVIEW
'""'ll-50% DAC 0
n/a 0
0 0
0 0
0 Indication with loss of BE n/a 0
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a No other indications requiring evaluation according to ASME B&PVC Section XI or USNRC Reg Guide 1.150 Revision 1 (Alternative Method) were recorded.
Ifindications were flagged by the GERIS 2000 Analysis System as requiring further evaluation, the indications have been further evaluated and the evaluation is attached.
Automated and manual UT Composite Coverage = 67.3% (Does not include 70')
PREPARED BY DATE GE UT Level II (0.I >.'I REVIEWED BY DATE GE UT Level III U ILITYREVIEW DATE ANIIREVIEW
'""Z s 9)
SUMNV.DOC BROSMS FERRT PAGE
0
~
I
~\\ l-AQ I'
.Tue Nov 18 12:11:06 1997 90093 N4B Page 1 of 3
DATA
SUMMARY
SHEET t
Plant:
Browns Ferry Unit 2 Weld ID: N4B Code Edition:
1989 edition Code Category:
B-D Evaluation Level:
20 Relevant Indications:
No Non-Relevant Indications:
Yes Indications Requiring Further Evaluation:
No UT Channel Information:
Active Examination Transducer Orientation Channel Type Angle Angle Search Unit-Offset X
Y 1
2 3
W T
T B
0 45 60 0
0.0
-9.1 7.3 0.0 0.00 3.00
-3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Patch Information:"
) Patch ID: ""-,,
Cal ID Exam 'xam Exam Start End
Date h
S
. Examiner Init/Lvl n4b.t1.1 1
n4b.tl.2 1
n4b.tl.3 1
NOZ.1.INRC NOZ ~ 1.INRC NOZ.1.INRC
~o 06:53 07:29 10/07/97, 13 27 13:35 10/07/9 14:02 14:12 10/07/9 BROWNS FERRY R0 PAGE
~4
~ >
t 44
GE NUCLEARENERGY UTEXAMINATION
SUMMARY
SHEET REPORT NO:~~<
N4C Nozzle-to-Vessel Weld SYSTEM:
INITIALCALIBRATIONID:
CALIBRATIONVERIFICATIONS:
FINALCALIBRATIONID:
MANUALCALIBRATION:
MANUALDATA'OZ.1.
INR RC1.INITt 4C.TPL.1, N4B.TPL.1, N4F.TPL.1 NOZ.1.0 CG97%1, A2, -43,.-44, -45 DG97-15 Ultrasonic examination results were acceptable to the requirements ofASME BBPVC Section XI, 1989 Edition No Addenda, Category B-D welds and USNRC Reg Guide 1.150 Revision 1 (Alternative Method).
Automated 0', 2.25 MHzWeld and Base Metal, 45 /60'S, 1.0 MHz Transverse and Parallel scans were performed in accordance with procedure UT-BFN-702 V1 Revision 0.
Limited automated scanning was performed due to: 1) Nozzle configuration and 2). Insulation Support obstructions.
Supplemental manual O'L 2.25 MHz Base Metal; 45'/60' 1.0 Mhz Transverse and Parallel; and 70'L 2.0 Mhz Transverse scans examinations were performed in accordance with procedure UT-BFN-300V2 Revision 0 to examine areas not scanned with the automated system.
The GERIS 2000 OD automated UT system and Manual UT 0'eference is located at 3:00 o'lock.
The GERIS 2000 OD system recorded the following non-relevant indications:
O'eld Metal 45'ransverse 60'ransverse 45'arallel 60'arallel
- entry surface, clad
- clad, electrical, entry surface, nozzle bore
- clad, electrical, entry surface, nozzle bore
- clad, entry surface, electrical, non-relevant
- dad, entry surface, electrical, non-relevant These non-relevant indications were flagged and excluded from the final report.
The GERIS 2000 OD system recorded the following relevant indications:
O'eld Metal O'ase Metal 45'ransverse 60'ransverse 45'arallel cw 60'arallel cw 45'arallel ccw 60'arallel ccw
>20% DAC 0
n/a 0
0 0
0 0
0
>50% DAC 0
n/a 0
0 0
0 0
0 Indication with loss of BE n/a 0
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a No other indications requiring evaluation according to ASME B&PVC Section XI or USNRC Reg Guide 1.150 Revision 1 (Alternative Method) were recorded.
Ifindications were flagged by the GERIS 2000 Analysis System as requiring further evaluation, the indications have been further evaluated and the evaluation is attached.
Automated and manual UT Composite Coverage = 67.3% (Does not include 70')
REPARED BY DATE GE UT Level II REVIEWED BY DATE GE UT Level III UT ITY REVIEW DATE ANIIREVIEW DATE SUMNV.DOC BROWNS FERRY Ri PAGE i
OF
I
~ ~
r 0
'4
'l'PI
'I
) IV
~~Il
~'ll
~IO
.Wed Oct 15 13:54:50 1997 Qg/69 N4C Page 1 of 3
DATA
SUMMARY
SHEET Plant:
Browns Ferry Unit 2 Weld ID: N4C Code Edition: 1989 edition Code Category:
B-D Evaluation Level:
20 Relevant Indications:
No Non-Relevant Indications:
Yes Indications Requiring Further Evaluation:
No UT Channel Information:
Active Examination Transducer Orientation Search Unit-Offset Channel Type Angle Angle X
Y 1
2 3
4 W
T T
B 0
'5 60 0
0.0
-9.1 7.3 0.0 0.00 3.00
-3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Patch Information:
'4 Patch ID '
Cal ID
= Exam Exam
- Exam, Start End Date
,, Examiner
'nit/Lvl n4c. tl. 2 1
n4c.tl.3 1
n4c.tl.1 3
NOZ.1.'INRC NOZ ~ 1.INRC NOZ.1.INRC 15:35 15:43 10/07/97 5 15:53 16:01 10/07/97 5
01:15 01:51 10/07/97 g~~
BROWNS FERRY R
9 PAGE <
OF
~.
q ~
p 0
L*
"j'il
GE NUCLEARENERGY UT EXAMINATION
SUMMARY
SHEET REPORT NO:~>g~
PROJECT WELD ID:
SYSTEM:
BFN Cycle 9 N5B Nozzle to Vessel RPV - Core Spray INITIALCALIBRATIONID:
CALIBRATION VERIFICATIONS'INAL CALIBRATIONID:
MANUAL CALIBRATION'ANUAL DATA:
NOZ.1.INR RC1.INITQ 3B.TPL.2, N5B.TPL.1 NOZ.1.OUT CG97-CG97-54, -55, -56, -57, -58, -85, -86, -87 DG97-20, -21, 40 Ultrasonic examination results were acceptable to the requirements ofASME BEPVC Section XI, 1989 Edition No Addenda, Category B-D welds and USNRC Reg Guide 1.150 Revision 1 (Alternative Method).
Automated 0', 2.25 MHzWeld and Base Metal, 45'/60'S, 1.0 MHzTransverse and Parallel scans were performed in accordance with procedure UT-BFN-702 V1 Revision 0.
Limited automated scanning was performed due to: 1) Nozzle configuration and 2). Insulation Support obstructions
. Supplemental manual O'L 2.25 MHz Base Metal; 45'/60' 1.0 Mhz Transverse and Parallel; and 70'L 2.0 Mhz Transverse scans examinations were performed in accordance with procedure UT-BFN-300V2 Revision 0 to examine areas not scanned with the automated system.
The GERIS 2000 OD automated UT system and Manual UT 0'eference is located at 3:00 o'lock.
The GERIS 2000 OD system recorded the following non-relevant indications:
O'eld Metal O'ase Metal 45'ransverse 60'ransverse 45'arallel 60'arallel
- entry surface, clad
- entry surface
- dad, electrical, entry surface, nozzle bore, non-relevant indication
- dad, electrical, entry surface, nozzle bore
- dad, entry surface, electrical, non-relevant indication
- dad, entry surface, electrical, non-relevant indication These non-relevant indications were flagged and exduded from the final report.
The GERIS 2000 OD system recorded the following relevant indications:
O'eld Metal O'ase Metal 45'ransverse 60'ransverse 45'arallel cw'0'arallelcw 45'arallel ccw 60'arallel ccw 20% DAC 0
n/a 0
0 0
0 0
0
>50% DAC 0
n/a 0
0 0
0 0
0 Indication with loss of BE n/a 0
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a No other indications requiring evaluation according to ASME B&PVC Section XI or USNRC Reg Guide 1.150 Revision 1 (Alternative Method) were recorded.
Ifindications were flagged by the GERIS 2000 Analysis System as requiring further evaluation, the indications have been further evaluated and the evaluation is attached.
Automated and manual UT Composite Coverage = 64.9% (Does not include 70')
REPARED BY DATE GE UT Level II lr-I7-li c: ~j~
REVIEWED BY DATE GE UT Level III UTILITYREVIEW DATE ANIIREVIEW DATE SUMNV.DOC BROWNS FEST Rl PAGE~OF~~
~
~
e r~
4'am:r
V Zri Oct 17 18:00:12 1997 0Ci 302
- IS NSB Page 1 of 3
DATA
SUMMARY
SHEET Plant:
Browns Ferry Unit 2 Weld ID: NSB Code Edition:
1989 edition-No-Addenda Code Category:
B-D Evaluation Level:
20 Relevant Indications:
No Non-Relevant Indications:
Yes Indications Requiring Further Evaluation:
No UT Channel Information:
Active Channel Examination Transducer Type Angle Orientation Search Unit-Offset Angle X
Y 1
3 4
W T
"T B
0 45 60 0
0.0
-10.5 8.2 0.0 0.00 3.00
-3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 I
4 Patch Information:.',
',Patch ID Cal, ID-N Exam Exam Exam
- , Examiner Start End Date Init/Lvl'5b.tl.l 1
NOZ.1.INRC 14: 58 15: 18 10/09/97N~
BROWNS FERR'f Rg PAGE~GE
p
~
Ci g (i r JC l
0u 36 j.
GE NUCLEARENERGY UTEXAMINAT/ON
SUMMARY
SHEET PROJECT BfN Cycle 9 WELD ID:
N9 Nozzle to Vessel SYSTEM:
RPV - CRD Return Line REPORT NO:~~
MANUALCALIBRATION:
MANUALDATA'G97-29, -30, -31, -32, -33 DG97-11, -12 Ultrasonic examination results were acceptable to the requirements ofASME B&PVC Section XI, 1989 Edition No Addenda, Category B-D welds and USNRC Reg Guide 1.150 Revision 1 (Alternative Method).
Manual O'L 2.25 MHz Base Metal; 45'I 60' 1.0 Mhz Transverse and Parallel; and 70'L 2.0 Mhz Transverse scans were performed in accordance with procedure UT-BFN-300V2 Revision 0. Limited scanning was performed due to: 1)
Nozzle configuration and 2). Insulation Support obstructions.
The Manual UT 0'eference is located at 3:00 o'lock.
No indications requiring evaluation according to ASME B&PVC Section XI or USNRC Reg Guide 1.150 Revision 1 (Alternative Method) were recorded.
Automated and manual UT Composite Coverage = 74.7% (Does not include 70')
i
EPARED BY DATE GE UT Lovel II l0. t>.11 REVIEWED BY DATE GE UT Level III UTILITYREVIEW DATE d~
T ANIIREVIEWj~alv SUMNV.DOC BROWNS FERRY RI PAGE I
OF~I
E,0 g
-