ML18038A141
| ML18038A141 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Nine Mile Point |
| Issue date: | 03/14/1986 |
| From: | Mangan C NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORP. |
| To: | Adensam E Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| (NMP2L-0659), (NMP2L-659), NUDOCS 8603200092 | |
| Download: ML18038A141 (46) | |
Text
REGULATORY NFORMATION DISTRIBUTION S EM (RIDS)
ACCESSION NBR: 8603200092 DOC. DATE: 86/03/ 14 NOTARIZED: YES DOCKET 0 FACIL: 50-410 Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station>
Unit 2P Niagara Moha 05000410 AUTH. NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION MANGAN> C. V.
Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.
REC lP. NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION ADENSAMiE. G.
BWR ProJect Directorate 3
SUBJECT:
Forwards revised FSAR pages re GA.program. Program will be fully effective for all GA activities upon completion of 100 h warranty run. Info will be incorporated info Amend 26 to, FDSAR.
DISTRIBUTION CODE:
B001D COPIES RECEIVED: LTR ENCL SIZE:
TlTLE: Licensing Submittal:
PSAR/FSAR Amdts 5 Related Correspondence NOTES:
RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME BWR ADTS BWR EB BWR FOB HAUGHEYi M 01 BWR RSB INTERNAL:
ACR8 41 ELD/HDS3 IE/DEPER/EPB 3b NRR BWR *DTS NRR PWR-B ADTS NR DHFT/HFIB R
IL 04
/MIB EXTERNAL: 24X DMB/DSS (AMDTS)
NRC PDR 02 PNL GRUEL> R COPIES LTTR ENCL 1
1 1
1 1
1 2
2 1
1 6
0 1
1 1
0 1
0 1
1 1
1 0
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME BWR PD3 PD BWR EICSB BWR PD3 LA BWR'SB
LPDR 03 NSIC 05 COPIES LTTR ENCL 1
1 2
2 1
1 1
1 0
1 1
1 1
0 1
1 1
1 3
3
~~ crau~ 8+e, TOTAL NURSER OF COPIES REQUIRED:
LTTR ~
ENCL P4
'.4 r
1 I
, I I',>>"l',
<<I, 'IQ
't g 1
1 (
Q I
I
~I
<<?l ll
~
I I 1<<rh<<
I',k; tC'M,;'4 NN'I y?1
<<N,N
<<'1 I r
<<3
I
?M, NOI,'f?I l1 <<,?'M
' 'MII "
<<IIl<<,
I
'<< IN%
I,
? I iIM 3>><<
~V?
1", ll;l
'?l?r
)r<<I9'.
I M'rp, l
?
I I<<I'?I<<
II?i.l? I M
I
-I q
I. ?klan'".)'4 ~IIM
'1
'<<I I
,?, p<<,,l Nr'<<y
'II NM<<3?*I,'>J'
<<.A
',I7>
I
'" <<4" "]
<<I
<< l<<M 1 ~
I.I':<<;<i 1 3
'll
('T< <<
I"I1 M
j'
- .I. ) J."I l'." 4~,b'. I'Vd'VI.I~:-"7 I"M -'","JI
'1:?'"1
. 'JIB)
Q?'f M
~ 7 -'j'"" ? ) "'t
?
~ '
<<j
('<I
<<.',8 I'.<"I.3% ld')'.r"QX'..'. I; t
~ tl' I
f
'h I?Ip C
~
3 4 I (I<<
?, Y I'"l N '
'"'-'Hr'I',',l'<<
. J4'?
)
W <<
~ <<
'h
~,
h
~
t
~
V NIAGAIRA U MCIMMK NIAGARAMOHAWKPOWER CORPORATION/300 ERIE BOULEVARDWEST, SYRACUSE, N.Y. 13202/TELEPHONE (315j 474-1511 March 14, 1986 (NMP2L 0659)
Ms. Elinor G. Adensam, Director BWR Project Directorate No.
3 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 7920 Norfolk Avenue Washington, DC 20555
Dear Ms. Adensam:
Re:
Nine Mile Point Unit 2
..Docket No-."50-410 The NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM TOPICAL REPORT NINE MILE POINT NUCLEAR STATION UNITS 1
AND 2 OPERATIONS PHASE, NMPC-QATR-l, Revision 1,
December 1985 was accepted December 31, 1985 by Mr. B. K. Grimes, Director, Division of Quality Assurance, Vendor and Technical Training Center
- Programs, Office of Inspection and Enforcement.
This Topical Report will be implemented for Nine Mile Point Unit 2 as shown on the attached Final Safety Analysis Report pages.
This information will be incorporated in Amendment 26.
It is our intent to proceed with a normal orderly transfer of the Quality Assurance Program as described on the attached pages.
Basically, construction activities are addressed by the Preliminary Safety Analysis Report QA Program.
Acceptance testing and Preoperational testing are governed by the Chapter 17 Final Safety Analysis Report program.
During startup testing, all three programs, including the Topical Report, will be used.
After the time Nine Mile Point Unit 2 performs the 100 hour0.00116 days <br />0.0278 hours <br />1.653439e-4 weeks <br />3.805e-5 months <br /> warranty run, the QA Topical Report will be fully effective for all QA activities.
A letter will be provided indicating when the QA Topical Report will be the only governing progr am.
Very truly yours, BE)03200092 8603i4 PDR ADQCK 05000410 A
PDR'.
V. Mangan Senior Vice President NLR:ja 1381G Attachment xc:
R. A. Gramm, NRC Resident Inspector Project File (2) ggu0///tv'~~ '-
P~d(
~-
h e
0
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION In the Matter of Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation
)
(Nine Mile'oint Unit 2)
)
Docket No. 50-410 AFFIDAVIT C. V.
Man an
, being duly sworn, states that he is Senior Vice President of Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation; that he is authorized on the part of said Corporation to sign and file with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission the documents attached hereto; and that all such documents are true and correct to the best of his knowledge, -information and belief.
Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary t.'ublic in and for the State of New York and County of a
, this ~~
day of 1986.
Notary Public in and for 0
- County, New York My Com~gpAtlfllres:
Nots PubHc in the State al Nrnl Yortt
>uabPel In Onondaga Co. NL478llg Qy Commission Extnres tdtarch 80, l
~ s
e Mile Point Unit 2 FSAR 17.1 QUAj ITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DURING OPERATION Appendix D to the Unit 2 PSAR, as updated in accordance with 10CFR50 submitted under separate cover, defines the NMPC QA program used for the design and'onstruction phase of Unit 2.. This section describes the QA program to be used during the preliminary and preoperational testing phase of NMP2 including those preoperational/acceptance tests and retests performed in the period starting with fuel load and ending with the 100 hour0.00116 days <br />0.0278 hours <br />1.653439e-4 weeks <br />3.805e-5 months <br /> warranty run.
Startup testing and operational activities subsequent to preoperational testing will be governed by the Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation guality Assurance Program Topical Report Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station Units 1
and 2 Operations
- Phase, NMPC-OATR-l, Revision 1.
Figures 17.1-1 and 17.1-2 depict the organizational structure and lines of responsibility for the three program phases.
Figure 17.1-2 also shows that during the interval between fuel load and full power commercial operation, all three programs will be employed to handle any components or systems requiring reworking or retesting by the construction and preoperational test groups at NMP2 Following the 100 hour0.00116 days <br />0.0278 hours <br />1.653439e-4 weeks <br />3.805e-5 months <br /> warranty run at full power, the PSAR Appendix B and FSAR Chapter 17 programs will be replaced by the NMPC-gATR-l, Revision 1, Topical
(}A program.
17.1.1 Organization 17.1.1.1 General Organizational Structure The QA Department is a corporate department under the direc-tion of a Director of Quality Assurance (see Figure 17.1-1) who reports on quality matters to the President.
Further definition of the administrative and functional or-ganizations is included in the procedures developed to im-plement specific parts of this program.
Table 17.1-1 con-tains tabular cross-references from 10CFRSO Appendix B to the applicable NMPC procedures.
The QA Department regularly reviews the status and adequacy of the QA program, including a quality compliance review of all contractors and a
self-appraisal.
The organization of the Safety Review and Audit Board (SRAB) and the Site Operations Review Committee (SORC) is discussed in Section 13.4.
QA-related activities are performed by other individuals and groups in accordance with the requirements of the NMPC QA program manuals and Appendix '
to 10CFR50.
The NMPC or-ganizations that perform these activities for Unit 2 include:
1.
Nuclear Engineering and licensing.
Amendment 20 17.1-1 July 1985
C
~ ~
t 1
l
~ I I
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 FSAR 2.
Nuclear Construction.
3.
Purchasing.
4.
SRAB'Technical Specifications).
5.
6.
SORC (Technical Specifications).
Site Maintenance Superintendent Nuclear and Staff.
7.
8.
Technical Superintendent Nuclear and Staff.
Superintendent Chemical and Radiation Management.
9.
Superintendent Training Nuclear.
Amendment 20 17.1-1a July 1985
N t
E k
U
~
~
~
~
~
~
I '
I
~ o ~
~
~
~
~ ~ '
I
~ I
~
~
~ ~
~
~
~
I
~ ~
~
~
~
~
~ ~
~
~
I I
~
I ~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~ ~
~ '
I I
~
I I
I I
~
~
I ~
P P 0
P Q
g P P ~
P g
~
)
~ I I I
~ I
~
I
~
~
~
I ~
P P
~ P P
g
~
~ P P
P P
~
~
P
~
~
a
~ ~
~ P ~ I P q
~
P P ~ P
~ j
~ ~
~,
I 'q
~
fg BI II 0
p, 1
I Ik
'I
'I V
1 I
17 4
0
~ ~
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 FSAR TABZE 1.8-1 (Cont)
Re lator Guide 1.28, Revision 2
Februar 1979 Quality Assurance Program Requirements (Design and Construction)
FSAR Section Chapter 17 QA Topical Report QATR-1, Rev.
1 Position
- The Unit 2
project complies with the Regulatory Position (Paragraph C) of this guide.
- This commitment is modified at the time of the QA Topical Report implementation.
At that time, the QATR-1, Rev.
1 supersedes this commitment.
29 of 169
~
~
1 4
4
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 FSAR TABLE 1.8-1 (Cont)
Re lator Guide 1.30, Revision 0
Au st 1972 Quality Assurance Requirements for the Installation, Inspection, and Testing of Instrumentation and Electric Equipment FSAR Sections 3.11 and 7.2, Chapter 17, QA Topical Report QATR-1, Rev.
1 Position
- The Unit 2 project complies with the Regulatory Position (Paragraph C) of this guide.
The Unit 2 quality assurance program complies with Regulatory Guide 1.30 as described in Appendix VII of the Quality Assurance Manual for the project during construction.
Unit 2 also complies with this regulatory guide as described in Chapter 17 of the FSAR.
Regulatory Guide 1.30, Rev.
0, endorses IEEE Stan-dard 336-1971.
Unit 2 Specification
- E061A, Electrical Installation, invokes IEEE Standard 336-1977, which is more conservative than IEEE Standard 336-1971.
Section 3
of IEEE-336 addresses the requirements for preinstallation verification of material and equipment.
It also states
- that, "it is not intended to duplicate inspections but rather to verify that items are in satisfactory condition for installation."
Preinstallation verification includes the following:
1.
Identification of materials and equipment.
2.
Availability of procedures, instruction manuals, and special work instructions.
R3 3.
Review of records of storage and preventive maintenance measures.
4.
Visual examination of materials and equipment to ensure physical i'ntegrity.
All these required verifications are addressed by the SWEC QA program for receipt,
- storage, and preventive maintenance inspections.
These inspections meet the intent of IEEE-336, Section 3;
therefore, additional preinstallation Amendment 23 31 of 169 December 1985
- This commitment is modified at the time of the QA Topical Report imple-mentation.
At that time, the QATR-1, Rev.
1 supersedes this commitment.
0 4
C CP I
I 1
C g
4 I I
'I A
1
~ ~
'N
4
~ ~
0 0
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 CESAR TABTE 1.8-1 (Cont)
Re lator Guide 1.30, Revision 0 Au st 1972 verification is not done for the following components and materials (all equipment,
- however, is subj ect to preinstallation verification):
1.
Balance-of-plant electrical components and materials such as terminal
- blocks, fuses, connectors,
- lugs, mounting hardware,-etc.
2.
PGCC electrical components and materials that are shipped separately from the main panels by GE, e.g.,
- relays, meters,
- switches, connectors,
- lugs, mounting hardware, etc.
The above components and materials are subject to inprocess installation inspection and final installation inspections.
Amendment 23 31a of 169 December 1985
~
t
~ ~
U S
'l tAr el,
~
p't II
~
~
~ ~
TABLE 1.8-1 (Cont)
Re lator Guide 1.37 Revision 0
March 16 1973 Quality Assurance Requirements for Cleaning of Fluid Systems and Associated Components of Water-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants FSAR Sections 4.5.1.4, 4.5.2.4, 6.1.1, and 17.2 gA Topical Report QATR-1, Rev.
1 Position
- The Unit 2 project complies with the Regulatory Position (Paragraph C) of this guide through the alternate approaches described below.
Para ra h C.3 The water quality for final flushes of fluid systems and associated components is at least equivalent to the quality of the operating system water, except for the oxygen content.
2
~
Para ra h C. 4 Expendable materials, i.e.,
inks and related products, temperature indicating
- sticks, tapes, gummed
- labels, wrapping materials (other than polyethylene),
water soluble dam materials, lubricants, NDT penetrant materials, and couplants that contact stainless steel or nickel alloy surfaces are in accordance with the Unit 2 Position for Regulatory Guide 1.38, Revision 2.
3.
Due to seasonal conditions, freshwater from Lake
.Ontario will have an allowable upper pH limit of 8.5.
4 Upgraded piping systems and components constructed of carbon steel materials will meet Class B
cleanness requirements except for final flushing/cleaning which may exhibit rust staining in accordance with Class C cleanness requirements.
The quality assurance requirements of Regulatory Guide 1.37 have been addressed in Appendix VII of the Quality Assurance Program Manual and Section 17 for the Unit 2 project.
Erection specifications and procedures for Category I fluid systems and associated components include the requirements of the guide as delineated above.
Amendment 9
38 of 169 March 1984
- This commitment is modified at the time of the gA Topical Report imple-mentation.
At that time, the gATR-1, Rev.
1 supersedes this commitment,
~ ~
I
~I
~ ~
~
4l Nine Mile Point Unit 2 FSAR TABDE 1.8-1 (Cont)
Re lator Guide 1.38, Revision 2
Ma 1977 Quality Assurance Rectuirements for Packaging,
- Shipping, Receiving,
- Storage, and Handling of Items for Mater-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants FSAR Section Chapter 17, gA Topical Report gATR-1, Rev.
1 Position
- The Unit 2 project complies with the Regulatory Position (Paragraph C) of this guide.
SWEC and NMPC QA program satisfies the QA requirements of Regulatory Guide 1.38 (Unit 2 QA-Program Manual Appendix VII and Section 17).
- This commitment is modified at the time of the gA Topical Report implementation.
At that time, the gATR-l, Rev.
1 supersedes this commitment.
39 of 169
0 1
1
,V L
t 1
\\
K I
I A
~
1
0 0
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 FSAR TABLE 1.8-1 (Cont)
Re lator Guide 1.39 Revision 2
Se tember 1977 Housekeeping Requirements for Water-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants FSAR Section ChaPter 17, QA Topical Report QATR-1, Rev.
1 Position
- The Unit 2 project complies with the requirements of the Regulatory Position (Paragraph C) of this guide.
Erection and installation specifications establish the requirements and the QA provisions to ensure compliance with this guide.
Additionally, the requirements are implemented by site administrative procedures.
- This commitment is modified at the time of the QA Topical Report implementation.
At that time, the QATR-1, Rev.
1 supersedes this commitment.
40 of 169
~
~
~
~
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 FSAR TABLE 1.8-1 (CONT)
Re lator Guide 1.58 Revision 1
Se tember 1980 Cont Qualification of Nuclear Power Plant Inspection, Examination, and Testing Personnel FSAR Section 2.4 Position The Unit 2
- project, complies with the Regulatory Postion
( Paragraph C ) of this guide through the alternate approaches described below and in Chapter 14.
The quality assurance program for Unit 2 is currently in compliance with Regulatory Positions C.5, 7,
8, and 10 of this regulatory guide.
Regarding Regulatory Position C.6 of this regulatory guide and Section 3.5, Education and Experience Recommendations, of ANSI N45.2.6-1978, the following alternatives are proposed for personnel education and experience for each level:
3.5.1 Level I Two years of related experience in equivalent inspection, examination, or testing activities, or 2.
High school graduation/general education development (GED) equivalent and 6 months of related experience in equivalent inspection, examination, or testing activities, or 3.
Completion of college-level work leading to an associate degree in a
related discipline plus 3 months of related experience in equivalent inspection, examination, or testing activities
~
Four-year college graduate plus 1 month of related experience or equivalent inspection, examination, or testing activities.
Amendment 22 64 of 169 November 1985
0
~
~
i 1
'7 A
f J'
~
II g
I i
I
ine Mile Point Unit 2 FSA TABLE 1.8-1 (Cont)
Re lator Guide 1.58, Revision 1
September 1980 (Cont 3.5.2 Level II l.
One year of satisfactory performance as Level I or 5 years related experience in the corresponding inspection, examination, or test. category or class, or 2.
High school graduation/GED equivalent plus 3 years of related experience in equivalent inspection, examination, or testing activities, or 3.
Completion of college-level work leading to an as-sociate degree in a related discipline plus 1 year related experience in equivalent inspection, examination, or testing activities, or Four-year college graduate plus 6 months of related experience in equivalent inspection, examination, or testing activities.
3 '
Level III Six years of satisfactory performance as a Level II or 15 years of related experience in the cor-responding inspection, examination, or test category or class, or 2.
High school graduate/GED equivalent plus 10 years of related experience in equivalent inspection, examination, or testing activities; or high school graduation plus 8 years ezperience in equivalent inspection, examination, or testing activities, with at least 2 years as Level II, and with at least 2 years associated with nuclear facilities or if not, at least sufficient training to be ac-quainted with the relevant quality assurance aspects of a nuclear facility, or 3.
Completion of college level work leading to an as-sociate degree and 7 years of related experience in equivalent inspection, examination, or testing activities, with at, least 2 years of this ex-perience associated with nuclear facilities, or if not, at least sufficient training to be acquainted 65 of 169
0 I,
A
~'
tl I
~
. ~
~
0 Nine Mile Point Unit 2 FSAR TABLE 1.8-1 (Cont)
Re lator Guide 1.58, Revision 1
Se tember 1980 Cont with the relevant quality assurance aspects of a nuclear facility, or Four-year college graduate plus 5 years of related experience in equivalent inspection, examination, or testing activities, with at least 2 years of this experience associated with nuclear facilities - or if
- not, at least sufficient training to be acquainted with the relevant quality assurance aspects of a nuclear facility.
5.
Graduate degree plus 3 years of related experience in equivalent inspection, examination, or testing activities, with at least 2 years of experience as-sociated with nuclear facilities or, if not, at least sufficient training to be acquainted with the relevant quality assurance aspects of a
nuclear facility.
NMPC The NMPC quality assurance program for Unit 2 is currently in compliance with Regulatory Positions C.5, 6,
7, 8,
and 10 of Regulatory Guide 1.58, Revision 1.
NSSS General Electric startup operations personnel qualifications meet the requirements of this guide as described below:
Personnel are selected and trained according to the criteria of ANSI N18.1-1971 (NRC Regulatory Guide 1.8), with the exception of NRC Licensing.
2.
The Operations Manager meets the equivalent of ANSI N18.1, Paragraph 4.2.2, Operations Manager.
The Operations Manager is normally present for preoperational
- testing, and will therefore be qualified at the time that preoperational testing is begun.
The Operations Superintendent meets the equivalent of ANSI N18.1, Paragraph 4.3.1, Supervisors Requiring NRC Licenses.
The Operating Superinten-66 of 169
4 1
il 4
J P
~
E
~
4
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 FSAR TABIE 1.8-1 (Cont)
Re lator Guide 1.58, Revision' Se tember 1980 Cont dent will normally be present for preoperational testing and therefore will be qualified at the time preoperational testing is begun.
The Shift Superintendents meet the qualification of ANSI N18.1, Paragraph 4.3.1, Supervisors Requiring NRC licenses.
5
~
The Iead Startup Test Design and Analysis Engineer meets the qualifications of ANSI N18.1, Paragraph 4.4.1, Reactor Engineering and Physics.
He will be qualified at the time of initial core loading or appointment to the position.
His onsite responsibilities begin just prior to fuel loading.
6.
The Startup Test Design and Analysis Engineers meet the qualifications of ANSI N18.1, Paragraph 3.3, Reactor Technical support personnel.
Their onsite responsibilities begin just prior to fuel loading.
7.
The Startup Control and Instrumentation Engineer meets the qualifications of ANSI N18.1, Paragraph 4.4.2, Instrumentation and Control.
He will be qualified at the time preoperational test-ing is begun.
8.
The Startup Chemist meets the qualifications of ANSI N18. 1, Paragraph
- 4. 4. 3, Radiochemistry, utilizing cumulative experience from several reac-tor startup programs.
He will be qualified-at the time of the initial core loading.
67 of 169
~
~
~ '
~4 I
~
~
~
~
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 FSAR TABI,E 1.8-1 (Cont)
Re lator Guide 1.88 Revision 2
October 1976 Collection,
- Storage, and Maintenance of Nuclear Power Plant Quality Assurance Records FSAR Section Chapter 17, QA Topical Repor~
QATAR-I, Rev.
1 Position
- The Unit 2
project complies with the Regulatory Position (Paragraph C) of this
- guide, except to change ANSI N45.2.9-1974 Section 5.6, Paragraph 3
to "Two hour minimum rated facility" in accordance with NFPA 232-1980.
Implementation is as described below.
Unit 2 Quality Assurance Records (and other required records) are stored in facilities designated as the Permanent Plant File and the Records Acceptance Center.
z~
In-process records are stored in controlled Intermediate Storage Facilities.
Specific requirements for each include:
Permanent Plant File Complies to the above paragraph of this position statement.
2.
Records Acce tance Center
Complies with ANSI N45.2.9-1974, Section 5.3 to provide a meehan'ism to control records'he storage facility shall meet Section 5.6, except as follows:
a.
Structure has a minimum 2-hr fire rating.
b.
- Doors, frames, and hardware have a 2-hr vault door.
c.
Electrical facilities shall be limited to ceiling lights, air-conditioning units, smoke detectors, and alarm circuits.
Intermediate Stora e
Facilities
Complies with ANSI N45.2.9-1974, Section 5.3 to provide a
mechanism to control records.
Each intermediate storage facility shall be evaluated by a
Fire Protection Engineer to fulfill NFPA 232-1980 requirements.
NOTE:
All intermediate storage facilities will be eliminated as contractor work is concluded.
Amendment 22 102 of 169 November 1985
~
~
~
~
4 ~
4
~
I
~
~
~
~
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 FSAR TABIE 1.8-1 (Cont)
The above controls and facilities are prepared to protect Quality Assurance records which take their physical form as radiographs, microfilm and paper.
1.
Special handling and environmental storage considerations must be maintained for radiographs.
2
~
Designated archive
( silver halide only) microfilm requires environmental storage considerations.
3.
Use of fire-retardant cabinets is applicable to paper storage only.
Technical Justification ANSI N45.2.9-1974 does not adequately define the storage facilities for inprocess quality records or NFPA requirements for fire rating of the facility.
NFPA 232-
- 1980, 1-3, emphasizes, "To consult with an experienced and competent Fire Protection Engineer or Records Protection Consultant."
This position is based upon his recommendations.
The Unit 2
Records Management Plan establishes the program for
- turnover, collection,
- review, transfer, receipt, verification, permanent plant file entry, and retention of all Unit 2 records with implementing policy guidelines which specify the facility types.
- This commitment is modified at the time of the qA Topical. Report imple-mentation.
At that time, the gATR-1, Rev.
1 supersedes this commitment.
Amendment 22 102a of 169 November 1985
el C
I 1
1 l)
J k
l 1,
'I
l t
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 FSAR TABIE 1.8-1 (Cont)
Re lator Guide 1.94 Revision 1
Aoril 1976 Quality Assurance Requirements For Installation, Inspection, and Testing of Structural Concrete and Structural Steel During the Construction Phase of Nuclear Power Plants FSAR Section Chapter 17, QA Topical Report QATR-1, Rev.
1 Position
- The Unit 2 project complies with the Regulatory Position (Paragraph C) of this guide through the alternate approach described below.
1.
ANSI N45.2.5-1974 Section 5.3 Bolt holes generally will not be burned (oxygen cut).
If holes must be
- burned, the following criteria will be followed: a) after cutting, the edges of the cut will be ground or reamed back a
minimum of 1/32 in, and b) the final bolt hole dimensions will not exceed those given in the Specification for Structural Joints Using ASTM A325 or A490 bolts.
2.
ANSI N45.2.5-1974 Section 5.4 For the Unit 2
- project, the criterion established for correct bolt length is one thread extending beyond the face of the nut.
3.
ANSI N45.2.5-1974 Section 5.5 All reinforcing bar splices made by arc welding, except those splices welded to metal embedments, will be selected on a
random basis for radiography as specified in the Unit, 2-PSAR, Section 12.6.3, and inspected in ac-cordance with AWS D12.1.
Splices welded to metal embedments will be inspected in accordance with AWS 12.1.
Additionally, sister splice testing will be done in accordance with Specification No.
NMP2-S203C with the same frequency as specified for B-series sister splices when required by the engineers.
ANSI N45.2.5-1974 Section 6.2.2 Exceptions regard-ing mechanical splicing of QA Category I
reinforc-ing bars can be found in Unit 2 Project Position 1.10.
108 of 169
- This commitment is modified at the time of the QA Topical Report implementation.
At that time, the QATR-1, Rev.
1 supersedes this commitment.
t ht
~
~
I 4
e
~,
t I
4
Nzne Mile Point Unit 2 ESAR
~
I TABIE 1.8-1 (Cont)
Re lator Guide 1.116, Revision 0-R Ma 1977 Quality Assurance'equirements for Installation, Inspection, and Testing of Mechanical Equipment and Systems FSAR Section Chapter 17, QA Topical Report QATR-1, Rev.
1 Position*
The Unit 2
project complies with the Regulatory Position (Paragraph C) of this guide.
- This commitment is modified at the time.of the QA Topical Report implementation.
At that time, the QATR-1, Rev.
1 supersedes this commitment.
130 of 169
II e
1 1
Nine Mile Point Unit-2 FSAR TABLE 1.8-1 (Cont)
Re lator Guide 1.123, Revision 1
Jul 1977 Quality Assurance Requirements for Control of Procurement of Items and Services for Nuclear Power Plants FSAR Section Chapter 17, gA Topical Report QATR-1, Rev.
1 Position
- The Unit 2 project complies with the Regulatory Position (Paragraph C) of this guide through the alternate approach described as follows:
Certain standard processed without native method paragraphs 1.4.1, Assurance Program catalog or nonengineered items may be seller prequalification.
This alter-is described in Section 7,
F 4.2, 1.4.3, and 3.1.2 of the Quality for Unit 2.
- This commitment is modified at the time of the gA Topical Report implementation.
At that time, the gATR-1, Rev.
1 supersedes this commitment.
137 of 169
\\
V 4
4I l
h 7
~
~
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 FSAR TABLE 1.8-1 (Cont)
Re ulator Guide 1. 144, Revision 1
Se tember 1980 Auditing of Quality Assurance Programs for Nuclear Power Plants FSAR'ection Chapter 17, QA Topical Report QATR-1, Rev.
1 Position
- The Unit 2
project complies with the Regulatory Position (Paragraph C) of this guide through the alternate approach described below.
The pre-audit and post-audit conferences required by Sections 4.3.1 and 4.3.3 of ANSI N45.2.12-1977 may be ful-filled by a
variety of communications such as telephone conversations.
- This commitment is modified at the time of the QA Topical Report implementation.
At that time, the QATR-1, Rev.
1 supersedes this commitments 162 of 169
'0 r
h N
~ f
Nine Nile Point Unit 2 E'ABLE 1.8-1 (Cont)
Re lator Guide 1.146, Revision 0
Au st 1980 Qualification of Quality Assurance Program Audit Personnel for Nuclear Power Plants FSAR Section Chapter 17, gA Topical Report gATR-l, Rev.
1 Position The Unit 2 project complies with Regulatory Position (Paragraph C) of this guide.
164 of 169
4 7j