ML18036A831

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Insp Repts 50-259/92-28,50-260/92-28 & 50-296/92-28 on 920720-22.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Matl Control & Accountability
ML18036A831
Person / Time
Site: Browns Ferry  Tennessee Valley Authority icon.png
Issue date: 08/21/1992
From: Mcguire D, Todd G
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML18036A833 List:
References
50-259-92-28, 50-260-92-28, 50-296-92-28, EA-91-120, NUDOCS 9209020079
Download: ML18036A831 (5)


See also: IR 05000259/1992028

Text

~8 RE0II

(4

P0

Cy

0O

V

IA

O

Y/

t

+>>*++

UNITEDSTATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION II

101 MARIETTASTREET, N.W.

ATLANTA,GEORGIA 30323

Report Nos.:

50-259/92-28,

50-260/92-28,

and 50-296/92-28

Licensee:

Tennessee

Valley Authority

3B Lookout Place

1101 Market Street

Chattanooga,

TN

37402-2801

Docket Nos.:

50-259,

50-260

and 50-296

License Nos.:

DPR-33,

DPR-52,

and DPR-68

Facility Nam

Inspection

C

Inspector:

Browns Ferry 1, 2,

and

3

nd cted:

July 20-22,

1992

fe

ards Inspector.

Da e

S gned

Approved by:

D. R. McGuzre, Chief

Safeguards

Section

Nuclear Materials Safety and

Division of Radiation Safety

ate

igned

Safeguards

Branch

and Safeguards

SUMMARY

Scope:

This routine,

unannounced

inspection

was conducted in the areas

of material control and accountability.

Results:

In the areas

inspected,

violations or deviations

were not

identified.

One open item was closed which was reported in NRC

Inspection Report Nos. 50-259/91-33,

50-260/91-33,

50-296/91-33

and reference

Enforcement Action (EA)91-120.

The licensee's

procedural accountability

improvements

were extensive

and

demonstrated

an upgraded

commitment to special nuclear material

control and accountability.

9209020079

920821

PDR

ADOCK 05000259

PDR

REPORT DETAILS

N

1.

Persons

Contacted

Licensee

Employees

  • G. Campbell,

Maintenance. Technician,

Engineering

  • P. Salas,

Manager,

Compliance

  • J. Scalice,

Plant Manager

  • J. Wallace,

Compliance Engineer,

Site Licensing

  • K. Welch, Reactor Engineer,

Technical Support

  • O. Zeringue,

Vice President,

Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant

(BNF)

'therlicensee

employees

contacted during this inspection

included engineers,

technicians,

and administrative

personnel.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission

  • W. Bearden,

Resident Inspector

  • Attended exit interview

2 ~

Followup On Corrective Actions For Previous Violations

and/or Deviations

(92702)

NRC Inspection Report Nos. 50-259/91-33,

50-260/91-33,

and

50-296/91-33 resulted in escalated

enforcement action as

referenced

in NRC Enforcement Action (EA)91-120.

EA 91-120

documented

a violation involving the licensee's

failure to

perform an adequate

physical inventory of special nuclear

material

(SNM) in 1990.

Specifically, the February

and

March 1990 physical inventories failed to include an item

containing

SNM, which was identified in the spent fuel pool

on September

7,

1991.

(CLOSED) Violation 50-259/91-33,

50-260/91-33,

and

50-296/91-33.

Failure To Perform An Adequate Physical

Inventory Of Special Nuclear Material.

The inspector

examined the licensee's

programmatic

. improvements

and specific corrective actions

and determined

the following:

TVA revised four procedures for ensuring:

(1) Plant

management is involved in daily activities of storing

radioactive material in the Spent Fuel Storage

Pools

(SFSPs),

(2) Low-Power Range Monitors

(LPRM) are

properly stored in one piece,

and

(3) the

SFSPs

are

expeditiously cleaned

up after an outage.

Procedure

0-GOI-100-3

was revised to address

the Plant Manager'

responsibility for activities in the SFSPs.

Additionally, this procedure

was revised to warn

personnel that

SFSPs

are not to be. used for long-term

storage of radioactive material

and that

a yearly

inventory be 'performed using a form requiring the Plant

Manager's signature.

Special Instrument Instruction 0-XX-92-051 Revision 6,

was revised to remove steps

which allowed

LPRMs to be

cut upon removal from the reactor cavity.

The current

revision requires the

LPRM to remain intact thereby

avoiding confusion of whether or not an

LPRM string

contains

a "hot"

(SNM) end or not.

Without cutting the

LPRMs,

(when they are removed from the cavity) should

prevent small "hot" LPRM pieces to be stored in

different locations in a

SFSP thereby potentially

losincf future inventory accountability.

Finally,

Radwaste Instruction RWI-116 was revised to allow LPRMs

to be cut only at the time they are being packaged for

disposal.

The three

SFSPs

were vacuumed to clear silt and small

debris from the

SFSP floors.

The silt contributed to

the oversight of SNM during the previous two inventory

phases.

A camera

was used to assist in the floor

cleanup locating small material for disposal.

Irradiated waste

was removed from the SFSPs.

Additionally, all non-essential

radioactive material

was removed from the SFSPs.

A final inventory was performed

and a current listing

has

been developed to establish

a current and accurate

base-line

inventory.

TVA hired an outside consultant to perform an

independent

assessment

of the

BFN SNM control program.

This assessment

investigated the following areas:

procedures,

personnel,

SNM accountability,

storage

areas

and containers,

records,

and control of

calibration sources.

The assessment

included

interviews with selected

licensee

employees,

document

evaluation,

records accuracy,

and extensive plant

tours.

The contractor

assessment

entitled "Browns Ferry

Nuclear Plant Special Nuclear Material Control Program

Assessment,"

dated

May 11,

1992,

concluded that there

is a heightened

awareness

of the

SNM Control Program

including its requirements

and responsibilities

throughout the entire

BFN organization.

3 ~

4 ~

Based

on this inspection followup.review, the inspector

concluded that the completion of all phases

of the original

SNM baseline

inventory program along with the completion of

the additional corrective actions

above, that appropriate

steps

have been taken and an adequate

program now exists to

prevent recurrence

of a similar violation.

Material Control and Accounting Power Reactors

(85102)

Nuclear Material Balance Reports

The inspector

examined the licensee's

Material Balance

Reports

(DOE/NRC Form 742) issued under Rep'orting

.Identification Symbols

XDP (Unit 1),

XFY (Unit 2),

and

XJD

(Unit 3) for the period ending March 31,

1992.

This

examination

was to determine whether the reports accurately

reflected quantities of fuel and non-fuel

SNM received

and

shipped

and whether uranium depletion

and plutonium

production had been entered.

The inspector determined that

the report was completed

and distributed in accordance

with

the printed instruction in NUREG/BR-0007 and the recorded

data were found to be in agreement with associated

accountability records.

Exit Interview

The inspection

scope

and results

were summarized

on July 22,

1992, with those persons

indicated in Paragraph

1.

The

inspector described

the areas

inspected

and discussed

in

detail the inspection results.

Although reviewed during

this inspection,

proprietary information is not contained in

this report.

Dissenting

comments

were not received

from

the licensee.

The licensee

was advised

by the inspector that no further

reports to the

NRC are required relative to the close-out

action on the violation referenced in NRC Inspection Report

Nos. 50-259/91-33,

50-260/91-33,

50-296/91-33,

and/or

EA 91-120.