ML18033B193

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Discusses Insp Repts 50-259/89-43,50-260/89-43 & 50-296/89-43 on 890911-1011 & Forwards Notice of Violation. Violations Include Inadequate Test Procedures & Failure to Meet Surveillance Test Intervals
ML18033B193
Person / Time
Site: Browns Ferry  Tennessee Valley Authority icon.png
Issue date: 03/02/1990
From: Crutchfield D
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Kingsley O
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
Shared Package
ML18033B195 List:
References
EA-89-226, NUDOCS 9003130021
Download: ML18033B193 (6)


See also: IR 05000259/1989043

Text

pe REG(pC

Wp0

~p%

4t

C

0O

D 4

)&***4

Docket Nos.

50-259,

50-260,

and 50-296

License

Nos.

DPR-33,

DPR-52,

and

DPR-68

EA 89-226

March 2,

1990

UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D, C. 20555

Mr. Oliver D. Kingsley, Jr.

Senior Vice President,

Nuclear

Power

Tennessee

Valley Authority

6N 38A Lookout Place

1101 Market Street

Chattanooga,

Tennessee

37402-2801

Dear Mr. Kingsley:

SUBJECT:

NOTICE OF VIOLATION (NRC INSPECTION

REPORT

NOS. 50-259/89-43,

50"260/89-43,

AND 50-296/89"43)

This refers to the Nuclear Regulatory

Commission

(NRC) special

inspection

conducted

by K. D. Ivey on September ll - October 11, 1989, which included

a

review of activities authorized for your Browns Ferry facility.

This special

inspection

was conducted to review a number of violations related to your

Technical Specification

(TS) surveillance

program.

The report documenting

this inspection

was sent to you by letter dated

November 2, 1989.

The

apparent violations described

in the inspection report,

when viewed

collectively, raised significant concerns

regarding your control of licensed

activities,

and accordingly,

NRC concerns relative to the inspection findings

were discussed

in an Enforcement

Conference

held on November 21,

1989.

The

letter summarizing this conference

was sent to you on January

2, 1990.

Surveillance testing

has

been

an ongoing problem at Browns Ferry and contributed

to the multi-unit shutdown in 1985.

The violations described

in the enclosed

Notice and referenced

inspection report encompass

many aspects

of your survei 1-

lance testing program.

The violations include inadequate

test procedures,

failure to meet surveillance test intervals, failure to implement and maintain

compensatory

measures

required

by technical specifications,

and the failure to

follow procedures.

These violations are similar to numerous other violations

that occurred over the past

two years'while all three units have

been shut down.

In summary,

these deficiencies indicate that sufficient management

attention

was not directed to fully correcting. the identified problems

and adequately

implementing the improved surveillance test program developed

since

1986, until

the

NRC became

involved.

In accordance

with the "General

Statement

of Policy and Procedure for NRC

Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix

C (1989), the violations described

in the enclosed

Notice have

been categorized

in the aggregate

as

a Severity

9003i3002i

900302

PDR

ADOCK 0 000259

A

PDI.

Mr. Oliver D. Kingsley, Jr.

~

~

~

~

~

"2"

March 2,

1990

'Level III problem.

A civil penalty is normally considered for a Severity Level

III violation or problem.

However, after consultation with the Director, Office

of Enforcement,

and the Deputy Executive Director for Nuclear Materials Safety,

Safeguards,

and.Operations

Support, I have decided that

a civil penalty will

not be proposed

in this case.

This decision is based

on the merits of the case

after consideration of the guidance in Section

V.G. of the

NRC Enforcement

Policy.

The safety significance of the violation is minimized because all

Browns Ferry units have

been in an extended

shutdown since

1985.

We recognize

you are implementing

an

NRC approved

program to ensure

compliance prior to the

restart of Unit 2.

Also, your overall performance

in this area

has

improved

significantly since you were

made

aware of the violations.

This is evidenced

by the various steps

you have taken to improve personnel

accountability

and

adherence'to

the surveillance testing program requirements.

It appears

that

this has resulted in the subsequent

absence

of new

LERs or violations in this

area.

However,

we emphasize

that if Browns Ferry had not been in its extended

shutdown,

a civil penalty would have

been proposed.

You are required to respond to this letter and the enclosed Notice,

and should

follow the instructions specified therein

when preparing your response.

In

your response,

you should document the specific actions

taken

and any additional

actions

you plan to prevent recurrence.

In preparing your response,

you should

give particular attention to explain those actions to be taken to improve the

communication

between your surveillance,

maintenance,

engineering,

and operations

staffs.

After reviewing your response

to this Notice, including your proposed

corrective actions

and the results of future inspections,

the

NRC will determine

whether further

NRC enforcement action is necessary

to ensure

compliance with

NRC regulatory requirements.

In accordance

with Section 2.790 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice,"

Part 2,

Title 10,

Code of Federal

Regulations,

a copy of this letter and the enclosure

will be placed in the

NRC Public Document

Room.

The responses

directed

by this letter and the enclosed

Notice are not subject

to the clearance

procedures

of the Office of Management

and Budget's

required

by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980,

Pub.

L.

No.96-511.

Should you have

any questions

concerning this letter, please contact

us.

Sincerely,

en

ss

. Crutch

se d,

As

ciate Director

for Special

Projects

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Enclosure:

Notice of Violation

cc w/enclosure:

See next page

0

0

Mr. Oliver D. Kingsley, Jr.

-3-

March 2,

1990

cc w/enclosure:

General

Counsel

Tennessee

Valley Authority

400 West Summit Hill Drive

ET 118

33H

Knoxville, Tennessee

37902

Mr.

F.

L. Moreadith

Vice President,

Nuclear Engineering

Tennessee

Valley Authority

400 West Summit Hill Drive

WT 12A 12A

Knoxville, Tennessee

37902

Dr. Mark 0. Medford

Vice President

and Nuclear

Technical Director

Tennessee

Valley Authority

6N 38A Lookout Place

Chattanooga,

Tennessee

37402-2801

Manager,

Nuclear Licensing

and Regulatory Affairs

Tennessee

Valley Authority

5N 157B Lookout Place

Chattanooga,

Tennessee

37402-2801

Mr, 0. J.

Zeringue

Site Director

Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant

Tennessee

Valley Authority

P.

0.

Box 2000

Decatur,

Alabama

35602

Mr.

P. Carier

Site Licensing Manager

, Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant

Tennessee

Valley Authority

P.

0.

Box 2000

Decatur,

Alabama

35602

Mr.

G.

Campbell

Plant Manager

Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant

Tennessee

Valley Authority

P.

0.

Box 2000

Decatur,

Alabama

35602

Chairman,

Limestone

County Commission

P.

0.

Box 188

Athens,

Alabama

35611

Claude Earl

Fox,

M.O.

State Health Officer

State

Department of Public Health

State Office Building

Montgomery,

Alabama

30323

Regional Administrator,

Region II

U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory

Commission

101 Marietta Street,

N.W.

Atlanta, Georgia

30323

Mr. Danny Carpenter

Senior

Resident

Inspector

Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant

U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory

Commission

Route 12,

Box 637

Athens,

Alabama

35611

Dr. Henry Myers, Science

Advisor

Committee

on Interior

and Insular Affairs

U. S.

House of Representatives

Washington,

O.

C.

20515

Tennessee

Valley Authority

Rockville Office

11921 Rockvi1 le Pike

Suite 402

Rockvi lie, Maryland

20852