ML18029A880

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Ack Receipt of 850813 & 30 Ltrs in Response to 850614 Order Involving Evaluation & Reporting of Potentially Significant Safety Conditions.Title or Position of Each Person Contacted During Survey of Employees Requested
ML18029A880
Person / Time
Site: Browns Ferry, Sequoyah, 05000000
Issue date: 09/24/1985
From: Taylor J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE)
To: Parris H
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
References
EA-85-049, EA-85-49, NUDOCS 8509260220
Download: ML18029A880 (4)


Text

~g REOI

~4

~o

-8 I

0 C

O lO

+~

gO

+a*++

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMIVIISS N

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 CP 3~SS EA 85-49 Wg-sz 7, s~P p~q z.gc),

~'t('ennessee Valley Authority ATTN:

Mr. H.

G. Parris Manager of Power and Engineering 500A Chestnut Street Tower II Chattanooga, TN 37401 Gentlemen:

Subject:

Sequoyah Units 1 and 2, Browns ferry Units 1, 2, and 3

We have received your letters dated August 13 and 30, 1985 in response to our Order of June 14, 1985 involving the evaluation and reporting of 'potentially significant safety conditions.

With regard to Item 1, although your response describes the general framework of planned procedural improvements, a more detailed explanation is required to demonstrate that the procedures are adequate to ensure prompt identification, evaluation, and reporting of potentially significant safety conditions.

In this regard, please provide the following:

(1)

Copies of the revised procedures incorporating the improvements you have instituted in response to the Order.

(2)

An illustration in detail of how an evaluation of a potentially significant safety condition will be conducted under the revised procedures.

For example, using the Sequoyah pressure transmitter

event, demonstrate how the event would be handled under the improved procedures, including maximum and minimum time frames in each step of the process from the time of identification of the Condition Adverse to guality.

(3)

The specific provisions built into the procedures for prompt notification of plant and corporate management when an immediate operability problem is identified and procedures for tracking resolution and correction of the problem.

With regard to Iteme3, the coded list of persons who were aware of the pressure transmitter qualification issue does not enable us to evaluate the results of the survey.

Accordingly, please provide the title or position of each person contacted during the survey of employees.

If you have further questions regarding this matter, please contact us.

Sincerely, 50q260220 0~0O025 spcyPP 8

R P,DOCK PDR,'s M.

ay r, Director ffice of I spection and Enforcement

0

.p cI

Tennessee Valley Authority Distribution

~y RVollmer, IE JAAxelrad, IE

ABBeach, IE JLieberman, ELD
PMcKee, IE
JNGrace, RII
GJenkins, RII
BHayes, OI IE:ES File IE:EA File DCS PDR

\\

IE:E

)

IE:DD I

ABBe 4N) e B

es PMBRhe eberman e rad RVollmer" J lor g/2gl85 g/Q/85

/

5 g/g/85 Q/Ze/85

/+/85 8/

/85

/85

v"

~