ML18026B133
| ML18026B133 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Browns Ferry  |
| Issue date: | 07/27/1984 |
| From: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18026B132 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8408130037 | |
| Download: ML18026B133 (2) | |
Text
C~
+~*y4 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION SUPPORTING AMENDMENT NO. l04 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-33 AMENDMENT NO.
98 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO.
DPR-52 TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT NOS.
1 AND 2 DOCKET NOS.
50-259 AND 50-260
- 1. 0 Introducti on By letter dated August 24, 1983 (TS 176 Supplement
- 10) the Tennessee Valley Authority (the licensee or TVA) requested amendments to Facility Operating License Nos.
DPR-33 and DPR-52 for the Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2.
The proposed amendments would. change the Appendix A Technical Specifications to delete surveillance requirements for Control Room Emergency Pressurization System dampers FCO-150A and FCO-150C.
These isolation dampers were removed, as part of a design
- change, when the Units 1,
2 and 3 Control Room Emergency Pressurization Systems were combined.
2.0 Evaluation The duct openings associated with dampers FCO-150A and FCO-150C have been permanently closed so that the isolation function previously provided by these dampers is no longer required.
The requested change is therefore, acceptable.
3.0 Environmental Considerations The amendments involve a change in the installation or use of a facility component located within the restricted areas defined in 10 CFR Part 20.
The staff has determined that the amendments involve no significant increase in the amounts, and no significant change in the types, of any effluents that may be released offsite, and that there is no significant increase in individual or cumulative occupation radiation exposure.
The Commission has previously issued a proposed finding that these amendments involve no significant hazards consideration and there has been no public comment on such finding.
Accordingly, the amendments meet the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9).
Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b) no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the issuance of the amendments.
8O081300~7 8" PDR ADOCN. 05000259 PDR
4.0 Conclusion We have concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that (i) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed
- manner, and (2) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations, and the issuance of these amendments will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.
Principal Contributor:
W. Long Dated:
July 27, 1984