ML18025B516
| ML18025B516 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Browns Ferry  |
| Issue date: | 04/09/1981 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18025B512 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-259-81-09, 50-259-81-9, 50-260-81-09, 50-260-81-9, 50-296-81-09, 50-296-81-9, NUDOCS 8105210206 | |
| Download: ML18025B516 (2) | |
Text
APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Tennessee Valley Authority Browns Ferry 1, 2, and 3
Docket Nos. 50-259, 260, 5 296 License Nos. DPR-33, 52, 5 68 As a result of the inspection conducted on February 26, to March 25,
- 1981, and in accordance with the Interim Enforcement Policy, 45 FR 66754 (October 7, 1980),
the following violations were identified.
A.
Technical Specification 6.3.A.S requires detailed written procedures shall be prepared and adhered to for preventive or corrective maintenance operations which could have an effect on the safety, of the reactor.
Browns Ferry Standard Practice
- 6. 1, Performance of Maintenance, requires that routine maintenance will be documented by use of a trouble-report.
Contrary to the above, the documentation of maintenance by use of a trouble report was not met in that on February 20, and 21,
- 1981, maintenance was performed on the scram discharge volume continuous monitoring system without documentation of the work performed.
B.
Technical Specification 6.3.D.2 requires that each high radiation area in which the intensity of radiation is greater than 1000 mrem/hr shall be locked and the keys maintained under administrative control of the shift engineers on duty.
Contrary to the above, on March 24, 1981, the keys to these areas were being maintained and used by health physics personnel and radwaste operators without being under the administrative control of the shift engineers on duty.
This is a Severity Level V Violation (Supplement I.E.).
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, you are hereby required to submit to this office within twenty-five days of the date of this Notice, a written state-'ent or explanation in reply, including:
(1) admission or denial of the alleged violations; (2) the reasons for the violations if admitted; (3) the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved; (4) corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations; and (5) the date when full compliance will be achieved.
Under the authority of Section 182 of the Atomic Energy Act of
- 1954, as amended, this response shall be submitted under oath or affirmation.
81 D581g 80g
mt