ML18025A011
| ML18025A011 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Susquehanna |
| Issue date: | 01/26/1976 |
| From: | Pennsylvania Power & Light Co |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| Download: ML18025A011 (150) | |
Text
g(
~C4~
uStLae 5 @/A SUSQUEHAMMA STEAM ELECTRIC STATIOM 5'b'8 APPLICANT'S ENVIRONMENTALREPORT REVISED JLILY'l9T2 AMENDMENTNO. 4 PENNSYLVANIAPOWER B LIGHT t OMPANY Allent.-own, Pennsylvania R-1733
PART V'RC CHAPTER'0 PLANT DESIGN ALTERNATIVES 1,0.9, TRANSMISSION FACILITIES 10.9.1 General Line Route Alternatives, Section 3.9.4 in Part II of this amendment addressed the three phased methodology utilized in the routing of the Sunbury-Susquehanna and Susquehanna-Siegfried 500 kV lines. A key step in that methodology was the network analysis. Within the large complex networks considered (448 links in the Sunbury Study Area and 660 links in the Siegfried Study Area) there is a very large number of distinctly different paths between the designated terminal points. The computerized network analysis comparatively evaluated virtually every possible path through each network in determining the single minimum impact path, but did not identify scores for non-optimal paths. Thus, the network arialysis phase effectively addressed a very large number of alternative line routes between the Susquehanna SES and the respective Sunbury and Siegfried terminal points.
In addition to the computerized identification of the minimum.impact routes, several specific alternative routes were identified by PPSL to be environmentally analyzed and compared with the minimum impact routes. Among these alternatives were the routes which represent the minimum economic cost between Susquehanna SES and the Sunbury and Siegfried terminal points. Three alternative routes for each line are environmentally compared in Table 10.9-A. Their geographical locations are shown in Figure 10.9-A.
Table 10.9-A summarizes in 24 general categories, the 117 detailed environmental factors considered in the network analysis. For each route, the inventoried quantity of each environmental factor type crossed is listed. Next to each inventory datum is the weighted value of the environmental impact which results from crossing that quantity of the particular factor type. Finally, the sum of the component impact values within a given'route expresses the value of the, overall or composite environmental impact associated with the particular route. The component impact values of the alternative routes are expressed in a common unit of measure and may be used to directly compare the various routes with respect to their, expected environmental impact.
10.9.2 Sunbury-Susquehanna Line Route Alternatives Alternative Route A was identified by the computer. analysis as having the (owest environmental impact (191 units) among all possible paths between the Sunbury and Susquehanna terminal, points. The environmental merits of this route are:
- 1) its relatively direct path between terminal points while also avoiding major environmental obstacles, and I
10.9-1
- 2) the fact of its parallel right-of-way sharing with existing 230 kV and 500 kV transmission facilities throughout its entire length.
II The other paths identified by PPSL for comparative environmental analysis are Alternative Routes B and C. Computer analysis indicates that the environmental impact associated with these routes are 297 units and 274 units respectively. (These are compared to the minimum possible impact of 191 units for Alternative Route A.) The location of the three alternative routes through the network are indicated in Figure 10.9-A. Empirical data and related impact scores for the three alternatives are compared in Table 10.9-A.
Alternative Route A was also the path identified by PPSL as being the minimum economic cost path between the Sunbury and Susquehanna terminal points. As with the envir'onmental merits, the economic merits of this route are:
- 1) its relatively direct path between terminal points, and 2) the fact of its parallel right-of-way sharing with existing facilities. By paralleling the existing Sunbury-Susquehanna 230 kV line, Alternative Route A makes use of vacant right-of-way which was acquired by PP&L concurrently with the required 230 kV right-of-way.
PPSL has determined that system reliability will not be adversely affected by using a common right-of-way for the existing 230 kV line and the Sunbury-Susquehanna 500 kV line. An analysis was made including the failure of both lines simultaneously, and under this condition all generating units will remain electrically stable and continue to produce energy.
Considering both the environmental merits and the economic merits of Alternate Route A, this route was selected as the optimum route for construction of the Sunbury-Susquehanna 500 kV transmission line.
10.9.3 Susquehanna-Siegfried Line Route Alternatives Three alternative line routes were compared within the Susquehanna-Siegfried study area. The preferred route (Alternative A) and Alternates B and C are shown in Figure 10.9-A.
10.9.3 1
Environmental Factors The three alternate routes were compared environmentally by summing the environmental impacts of the links comprising each alternative. Alternate A has a total environmental impact of 366 units.
Alternate 8
was found to be the minimum environmental path of all possible link combinations, having a total of 272 units. Alternate C has a total environmental impact of 392 units. The factors which contribute to these environmental impacts are summarized in Table 10.9-A.
The Susquehanna-Siegfried 500 kV line was identified prior to 1968 as a potential outlet for future Susquehanna generation additions beyond the presently planned Units 1 5
- 2. It was later determined that this line would be utilized by Susquehanna No. 1 and No. 2 as discussed in Section 3.9.1. The route of the line originally selected, followed Alternate C, which had the lowest economic cost. at that time. Right-of-way acquisition began in
- February, 1968, utilizing a 230/500 kV transmission corridor which PPSL had started to 10.9-2
acquire in October, 1966 between Siegfried Substation and the area known as Bossards Corners. Between February, 1968 and 1969, 22 percent ofthe rightof-way for Alternative C, was acquired.'etween 1969i and'973, a possible generating plant site. north of White Haven, Pennsylvania was under consideration.
Route C, was,modified to form Route A in order to provide one of..the eventual transmission outlets for both Susquehanna SES andi the White Haven, plant. Approximately 22 percent of the I'ength, of Alternate C is common to Alternate A. As of the time that the White Haven plant was no longer being actively considered,
- August, 1973, Alternative A was nonetheless, preferred. over Alternative C
because virtually all'f those portions of the. Alternate A right-of-way which were not common to Alternative C has been acquired, while almost none of Alternative C',s right-of-way which'as not shared with Alternative A has been acquired. Therefore, economic comparisons among, the available route alternatives favor Route A.
The. network analysis indicates that from an environmental, standpoint, Alternate Route B is the most desirable. The factors causing the greatest weighted difference among the, three alternative routes are: (1) number of residences passed;, (2), the amount of forest land crossed,'3) the amount of state game lands, crossed; and (4) the amount open land crossed!
a)
Residences; Due to the relatively heavy weight assigned to the-line proximity to residences, the total, environmental'mpact of residences, appears high for the three alternatives. Along Alternate Route A. there are 359 residences, along Alternate Route B, 342. residences and along Alternate Route C'here are 607 residences.. In Northampton County, where all three alternate routes use the same corridor paralleling the existing double circuit. 230 kV line, there are 140 residences.
b)
Forest Land The three counties crossed by Alternate Route A have-a total of 641,023 acres of forest land. The forest land to be occupied'by this line. route will be only 974 acres or less than 1'/15 of one percent of the total forest land in those counties.
The amount of forest land crossed was hi'gher on the Preferred Route (A) than on the Alternate Routes (B and, C) as a result of PPSL's policy, of locating, high voltage.
transmission lines away from
- highways, to avoid vehicle accidents, and away from residential areas where practicable.
PPSL's clearing policy for forest land provides for selective clearing, which allows low growing trees and brush to remain on the. right-of-way.
This results in retaining living vegetation on the corridor floor so thatan overall view of the forest from a distance, preserves a relatively unbroken vista. The present practice of retaining a fringe of trees at road. crossing, "tailored'clearings', effectively shields views down the transmission corridor. On deep gorges, where the conductors:are high above the ground, all vegetation will be retained except for the narrow cuts required for stringing wires.
Additionally, where the line crosses high ridges, the edges. of the rightof-way will be feathered back to reduce the notch effect.
1 0.9-3
State Game Land The three counties crossed by alternate line Route A have a total of 62,504 acres of state game lands. The state game land to be occupied by the line will be 108 acres or less than 1/17 of one percent of the total game lands in those counties.
The amount of state game lands crossed was higher on the Preferred Route (A) than on the Alternate Routes (8 & C) as a result of routing the line to pass by the once considered White Haven generating site, to avoid the Nescopeck State Park recreational area, to avoid the Crestwood Industrial Park north of Nescopeck Mountain and to cross this mountain at a point of least visual impact. As with the other forested area, there will be some beneficial effect on wildlifealong the right-of-way in that a variety of new species will be attracted to the game land by introduction of "edge effect" and where the windrowing of slash will provide protection to small game. Hunters will also have improved access to remote hunting areas. Also, PPSL Co. will install food plantings and reseed where requested by the Pennsylvania Game Commission. Additionally, the cleared right-of-way will in some instances provide fire breaks and permit access for the fire fighting crew in case of forest fires. A license for right-of-way for crossing State Game Land has been obtained from the Pennsylvania Game Commission.
d)
Open Land The environmental impact resulting from crossing open land is the same for Alternative Routes A and C, but less for Alternate Route 8 even though the amount crossed by Route 8 is more than Routes A and C. The reason for this is that almost all of Route 8 parallels an existing line. The weighting system used to evaluate the alternatives gives more weight to lines crossing new territory than to lines paralleling an existing line. Generally, lines crossing open lands are visible from a conside'rable distance.
In the case of Alternatives A and C, however, approximately 83 percent of the line length that crosses open land is in hilly terrain which is broken by wood lots so that the visual impact is less than ifthe land were level and treeless.
Also adjustments in the line to accommodate property owners resulted in angles in the line which break up the long views of line sometimes found in open land.
10.9.3.2 Costs OfAlternate Routes Construction costs for the three alternative routes, including labor and material for line construction, labor for clearing and access road construction and costs 'of right-of-way not previously acquired as shown in the table below, in terms of present-worth 1976 dollars.
Alternate Route A Alternate Route B Alternate Route C Construction Costs
$25,880,000
$26,337,000
$25,366,000 Right-of-Way (not previously acquired) 390,000 2,350,000 1,321,000 Total Cost of Installing Line
$26,270,000
$28,687,000
$26,687,000 1 0.9-4
Alternate Route B In addition to the costs of installing the line, there are certain additional costs which could result from possible delays in completing the line construction on schedule:
The target date for completion of the Susquehanna-Siegfried 500 kV line is established as May 1, 1980, the fuel load and testing date for Unit No. 1. The critical date for placing the line in service is September 1, 1980 at which time Unit No. 1 is expected to reach 75 percent of its full output capability. If the line is delayed beyond this date, unrestricted operation of Unit No.
1 would necessitate restricting output of the nearby Montour, Steam Electric.Station (SES) located in Montour County. This restriction would increase the overall system generation cost by approximately $779,000 per month.due to replacement of Montour SES power with more expensive fossil fuel generation. If long delays are
- foreseen, an emergency stop-gap capital expenditure of approximately
$2,400,000 to upgrade existing 230 kV lines would be required to avoid restrictions on Montour SES. This would only be a temporary mitigative measure.
Any delay beyond February 1, 1982 which is the critical transmission line in service date for Unit No., 2 will restrict the output of Unit No. 2 to approximately 50 percent of its full output capability.
This restriction will increase the overall system generation cost by approximately
$5,050,000 per month due to replacement of this power with more expensive sources. This represents a severe financial impact which can only be prevented by the timely completion of the Susquehanna-Siegfried 500 kV line.
It was determined by integrating the times required for new right-of-way acquisition, for delivery of materials and for construction of the line into the schedules for each alternative, that the most optimistic in-service dates for Alternates A, B, and P were May 1, 1980, November 1, 1980 and September 1, 1980 respectively.
The expected in-service date for Alternate Routes A meets the target date of May 1, 1980. A delay of up to 4 months would result in no cost penalty for this alternative.
However, the most optimistic in-service date for Alternate B is 6 months beyond the target date which would incur a cost penalty during the last 2 months of the delay. Tge best possible in-service date for Alternative C is 4 months beyond the target date which coincides with the critical date.
The cost exposure resulting from delayed in service dates are shown, in the followingtable:
Alternate Alternate Route A Route C In4ervice Date Delay Beyond Target Date Delay Beyond Critical Date Increase in System Generation Oper. Cost May 1, 1980 Nov. 1, 1980" Sept. 1, 1980" 0
6 months 4 months 0
2 months 0
$1,558,000 "Best possible dates without right-of-way delays Alternative A is more likely"to be constructed so as to meet the May 1, 1980 target than are Alternatives B and C. Theacquisition of right-of-way for Alternative A has 10.9-5
already been largely completed. As of June 1, 1976, 92.3 percent of the required right-of-way'. (50.6 miles) has been obtained by negotiations with the property owners.
Condemnation proceedings may be necessary for only 4 parcels of right-of-way representing 7.7 percent of the total length of the Alternative A route.
With respect to Alternatives B and C, at least one year following the decision to proceed with either of these routes would be required in order to do the detailed mapping, real 'estate identification and negotiations with property owners.
Only after this effort would it be possible to identify any parcels for which condemnation might be required and to initiate condemnation proceedings'.
Condemnation proceedings have generally taken at least two years time to complete after commencement of the proceedings.
While condemnation may be necessary for all three alternatives, the additional one year period required for identification and negotiations witli<respect to Alternatives B and C makes it much less likely that construction of the Susquehanna-Siegfried line along these routes can be completed on a timely basis.
V Based on previous experience, attempts to secure new right-of-way could be opposed by 'various groups or irldividuals which could cause delays due to requests for additional public hearings. This contingency would be avoided by using right-of-way for Alternate A which was previously secured amicably through negotiations with property owners at reasonable remuneration along a route which was previously reviewed by the Luzerne and Carbon County Planning Commissions as narrated in December 23, 1970 letter to Mr. J. L. Hilbish, PPSL Co., Division Operating"Manager.
The Northampton County Commission was not contacted at this time because right-of-way had already been obtained.
109.3.3 Reliability The alternate line routes have also been examined on a reliability basis. Routes A, B and C have the same exposure to a simultaneous outage of the 500 kV circuit and two 230 kV circuits from Point Z (Figure 10.9-A) south to Siegfried Substation. A common corridor outage in this southern portion of the line route will not jeopardize the reliability of the electric transmission system.
Since a failure in this portion is remote from Susquehanna and since the Hardwood Substation would be supplied from Susquehanna under this condition, the Susquehanna Units will remain stable and continue to produce useful electric energy. Almost the entire length of Alternate Route B has as exposure to a simultaneous outage of the 500 kV circuit and two 230 kV circuits due to the close proximity of the circuits in the common right-of-way corridor. A common corridor outage anywhere along the 9 miles of Route B between Susquehanna and Harwood Substations will adversely affect reliability. The simultaneous failure of all three circuits in this northern portion can cause electrical instability and consequential shutdown of both Susquehanna Unit No.
1 and Susquehanna Unit No. 2. The failure of these circuits and instability of both Susquehanna units represents a severe system disturbance which could result in the loss of additional system generation.
Instability has a very severe impact on an electrical system. In addition to this loss of large amounts of generation, severe damage can occur to both the electric generators and steam turbines.
Due to this potential instability, it is highly undesirable to establish a common corridor right-of-way on the northern portion of the 10.9-6
Susquehanna-Siegfried 500 kV line. Therefore, Routes A and C provide a significantly higher level of system reliability when compared to Route B.
'I 10.9.3.4 Land Use The alternate routes were also compared in terms of the impact on existirig and planned land use through right-of-way*acquisition. Almost all of the right-of-wayalong Route A has been acquired, in contrast to Route B and the portion of Route C between points X 5 Y (White Haven and Hobbie), which have very little previously acquired right-of-way. There is a likelihood that.,Route B involves a number of noncondemnable properties which if avoided would result in isolating land between Route B right-of-way and the parallel 230 kV right-of-way. Route C crosses a residential development south of Interstate 80, affecting 23 building lots within the right-of-way limits and an additional 254 lots within 1,000 feet of the right-of-way. Right-of-way acquisition in this area would seriously disrupt the developing land use.
By utilizing previously acquired right-of-way, Route A exposes the. least amount of land to potential land use impact among the, three alternatives.
10.9.3.5 Conclusions In conclusion, although Route,A does not represent the minimum environrpental path in the Susquehanna-Siegfried study, area, from an overall point of view it does offer the best compromise of economic, reliability and environmental considerations.
10.9-7
10.9 TABLES Table 10.9-A t'omparative Environmental Evaluation 1.
Sunbury-Susquehanna Alternative Routes 2.
Susquehanna-Siegfried Alternative Routes 10.9-8
TABLEOF CONTENTS PART I INTRODUCTIONAND
SUMMARY
Introduction Summary PART I I NRC CHAPTER 3 3.9 Transmission Facilities 3.9.1 Introduction To Section 3.9 3.9.2 Physical Characteristics Of The Transmission Facilities 3.9.2.1 Description Of Substations 3.9.2,2 Description Of Structures 3.9.2.3 Description Of Basic Design Parameters a)
Voltage b)
Capacity Under Normal And Emergency Loading Conditions c) d)
e)
Conductor Type And Configuration Ruling Spans Electrical Clearances 3.9.3 Environmental Characteristics Of The Line Route 3,9,3,1 Geographical Location Of The Route a) b)
c) d)
Proposed Alteration Susquehanna-Lackawanna 500 kV Line Susquehanna-Stanton 500 kV Line Reduction In Impact Area
3.9.3.2 Right-Of-Way Data 3.9.3.3 Terrestrial Wildlife 3.9.3.4 Area Land Cover Types a)
Forest b)
Pasture And Crop c)
Other 3.9.3.5 Area Land Use 3.9.3.6 Area Demography 3.9.3.7 Areas Of Clearing And Structure Removal 3.9.3.8 Special Features 3.9.4 Alternative Line Routes And Selection Criteria 3.9.5 The Anticipated Electrical Environmental Effects Of The Proposed 500 kV Transmission Line 3.9.5.1 Corona 3.9.5.2 Ozone And Ozides Of Nitrogen (ozone and oxides of nigrogen analysis of the proposed 500 kV overhead transmission lines) 3.9.6.3 Audible Noise a)
Evaluation Of The Audible Noise Impact On The Environment b)
Audible Noise Analysis Of The Proposed 500 kV Transmission Line 3.9.5.4 Electromagnetic Influence a)
Radio Influence Analysis Of The Proposed 600 kV Transmission Lines
Television Influence c)
Other Communication Facilities 3.9.5.5 Public Safety a)
Electrostatic Induction Effects (analysis of the electrostatic ground gradients of the proposed 500 kV trans-mission lines) b) 'lectromagnetic Induction Effects (analysis of the electromagnetic field of the proposed 500 kV transmission line) 3.9.6 References PART I II NRC CHAPTER 4 4.2 Transmission Facilities Construction 4.2.1 Right-Of-Way Development 4.2.1.1 Construction Techniques 4.2.1.2 Clean-Up And Restoration 4.2.2 Impact On The Natural Environment 4.2.2.1 Geology 4.2.2.2 Hydrology 4.2.2.3 Soils 4.2.2.4 Terrestrial And Aquatic Communities 4.2.3 Impact On The Man-Made Environment 4.2.3.1 Land Use
4.2.3.2 Demography 4.2.3.3 Special Features 4.2.4 Mitigative Measures PART IV NRC CHAPTER 5 5.5 Effects Of Operation And Maintenance Of The Transmission System 5.5.1 Anticipated Electrical Radiation Effects Of 500 kV Transmission Lines 5.5.1.1 Ozone And Oxides Of Nitrogen 5.5.1.2 Audible Noise 5.5.1.3 Electromagnetic Influence a)
Radio Influence b)
Television Influence 5.5.1.4 Electromagnetic Induction 5.5.1.5 Electrostatic Induction 6.5.2 Maintenance Of Transmission System 5.6.2.1 Maintenance And Repair Activities 5.5.2.2 Maintenance Of Rights-Of-Way 5.5.2.3 Maintenance Of Access Roads 5.5.3 Effects On Natural Systems 5.5.3.1 Geology 5.5.3.2 Hydrology 5.5.3.3 Soils 5.5.3A Terrestrial And Aquatic Communities
5.6.4
'ffects On Man-Made Systems 5.5.4.1 Land Use 5.5.4.2 Demography 5.6.5 References PART V NRC CHAPTER 10 PART VI NRC CHAPTER 11 PART VII APPENDIX Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C
PART I INTRODUCTIONAND
SUMMARY
INTRODUCTION This document is submitted to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) as a revision of the Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Applicant s Environmental Report Revised July, 1972, submitted by Pennsylvania Power 5 Light Company. This revision provides information regarding proposed changes'in the EHV electric transmission system associated with Susquehanna
- SES, specifically the Susquehanna-Lackawanna 500 kV transmission line.
The Susquehanna-Lackawanna line was originally discussed in Section [3.2] of the July, 1972'Report.
Proposed alterations to that line are addressed in this revision in conformance with the U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Regulatory Guide 4.2, Revision 1, January, 1975. Those sections of Regulatory Guide 4.2 which pertain to the proposed line alterations include: Section 3.9 Transmission Facilities, Section 4.2 Transmission Facilities Construction, and Section 5.5 Effects of Operation and Maintenance of the Transmission System.
This revision discusses in detail that information which is substantially different from information provided in the July, 1972 Report. Where information is substantially the same as that provided in the July, 1972 Report, direct references to the information are made in the appropriate sections of the following report.
These references specify the applicable July, 1972 Report section numbers within brackets f
). New information discussed herein, together with information specifically referenced from the July, 1972 Report, constitute a complete report on the environmental characteristics associated with the amended transmission line.
SUMMARY
In summarizing the following report, it is noted that the most significant difference between the amended line and the original line is a 25 percent reduction in overall length of the new line. The reduction in line length effects a correspondingly
significant reduction in overall environmental impact. Environmental impact associated with the amended line should further be reduced by the recent adoption of more restrictive construction specifications and by the use of "aesthetic transmission structures"'along the length of the line. Considering all aspects environmental; engineering and economic the transmission line changes proposed and discussed in this revision should constitute a
considerably more optimum system than the one described in the Ju/y, 1972 Report.
PART I I NRC CHAPTER 3 THE PLANT 3.9 TRANSMISSION FACILITIES 3.9.1 Introduction Pennsylvania Power & Light Company proposes certain alterations to their EHV electric transmission system as it relates to the Susquehanna Steam Electric Station near Berwick, Pennsylvania.
The transmission system alterations addressed in this report pertain to the previously proposed Susquehanna-Lackawanna 500 kV line. The alterations to the Susquehanna-Lackawanna 500 kV line will effect significant change and reduction in the impact of the line upon its environment. The alteration of the Susquehanna-Lackawanna 500 kV line entails two basic changes:
- 1) termination of the line at the Stanton Substation, and 2) the use of tubular steel H-frame pole structures throughout the length of the line.
Because of its termination at the Stanton Substation, the transmission line will be referred to as the, Susquehanna-Stanton 500 kV line.
The purpose of this section is to provide an accurate and up-to-date description of the proposed line and its environs, in order to assess the impact of the line. Relevant aspects of the line and its environs are discussed in terms of: 1) the physical characteristics of the transmission facilities (Subsection 3.9.2), 2) the environmental characteristics of the line route (Subsection 3.9.3), 3) alternative line routes (Subsection 3.9.4), and 4) the electrical environmental effects of the line (Subsection 3.9.5).
Since the proposed Susquehanna-Stanton 500 kV line facility and route bears a close similarity to the Susquehanna-Lackawanna 500 kV line addressed in the Ju/y, 1972 Report, Section 3.9 of this report will stress new information relevant to the differences resulting from the alterations.
Where information in this section is substantially unchanged from the previous
- report, the appropriate sections of the July, 1972 Report will be referenced.
3.9-1
3.9.2 Physical Characteristics Of The Transmission Facilities 3.9.2. 1 Description OfStanton Substation The Susquehanna-Stanton 500 kV transmission line will be operated at 230 kV initially and will terminate at the existing Stanton 230-66 kV Substation.
The Stanton 230-66 kV Substation is an outdoor, air-insulated facilityconsisting of four (4) 230 kV lines each terminating through a 2,000 amp circuit breaker on a single 230 kV bus. Three of the lines each supply a 75,000 kVA, 230-66 kV transformer for a total substation capacity of 225,000 kVA. The 66 kV portion of the station is arranged in an operating inspection bus scheme supplying eight (8) 66 kV lines.
3.9.2.2 Description Of Transmission Line Structures Design criteria for the proposed transmission line structures include consideration of, aesthetics, reliability, economics and safety. The proposed structure will be a tubular steel H-frame, internally braced.
The height of the structures will average 115 feet permitting spans of 1200 feet while maintaining ground clearances which will minimize any electrical environmental effects.
In areas where the 500 kV transmission lines parallel existing 230 kV transmission lines, the 500 kV structures will be located adjacent to the existing 230 kV structures to minimize land use requirements and to provide a compatible structure height, To minimize any visual impact, the 500 kV structures will be fabricated from weathering steel, which darkens naturally to a russet brown color. The portion of the Susquehanna-Stanton 500 kV line near the Susquehanna SES will have structures painted a medium green to harmonize with the 230 kV structures in that area.
3.9.2.3 Description Of Basic Design Parameters The proposed transmission line has been designed in conformance with the requirements of the National Electrical Safety Code and sound engineering principles.
a)
Voltage The Susquehanna-Stanton Line will be initially operated at 230 kV. The line will be constructed and insulated for ultimate operation at a maximum line voltage of 550 kV as an effectively grounded system.
b)
Capacity Under Normal And Emergency Loading Conditions The proposed line is designed to operate safely under a maximum normal current of 3470 amperes (3005 MVA) at 100 C and a maximum emergency current of 4360 amperes (3775 MVA)at 100'.
c)
Conductor Type And Configuration The conductor for the proposed line will consist of two subconductors per phase spaced eighteen inches apart in a horizontal configuration. The subconductor spacing will be 3.9.2
maintained by mechanical spacers installed at a sub-span spacing adequate to maintain the eighteen inch spacing.
The conductor size will be 2493 kcmil 54/37, Aluminum Cable Alloy Reinforced (AGAR) utilizing 54 strands of EC grade aluminum and 37 strands of 6201 aluminum alloy for reinforcement.
Conductor supporting
- devices, accessories and hardware will be specifically designed to coordinate with the voltage level and to minimize any electrical environmental effects. All conductor supporting assemblies will be tested electrically to insure proper performance under expected in-service conditions.
Two shield wires will be installed above the three phase conductor bundles for lightning protection. The shield wire size will be 19 No. 9 aluminum clad steel tensioned to coordinate with the sag of the phase conductors.
The shield wires will be positioned to provide a maximum positive shielding angle of 20'ith respect to the outside phases of the 500 kV circuit.
Each structure will be adequately grounded to insure that the structure remains at ground potential.
The grounding systems will be tested for adequacy during the construction of the line.
d)
Ruling Spans The conductors and shield wires will be installed based on a ruling span between angle or deadend (strain) structures. The tension limits on the conductor and shield wire at the installed ruling span will be established to protect the cables from vibration or mechanical damage under the climatic loading conditions anticipated over the life of the transmission line.
e)
Electrical Clearances The conductors will be installed to maintain adequate clearance over roads, railroads, power lines and communication lines in accordance with the requirements of the National Electrical Safety Code (Sixth Edition) and to maintain acceptable levels of radio influence, television influence, audible
- noise, electrostatic and electromagnetic fields.
Clearances will be maintained at the maximum thermal operating limitof the conductor of 100' (212').
3.9.3 Environmental Characteristics Of The Line Route This subsection provides a general outline of the line route and the environmental characteristics along that route.
The subsection addresses the following topics:
- 1) the geographical locations of the route, 2) data relevant to the dimensions of the right-of-way,
- 3) terrestrial wildlife, 4) land cover types'in the area about the right-of-way, 5) land use patterns, 6) demographic patterns near the right-of-way, 7) areas requiring clearing, and 8) special features near the right-of-way.
3.9-3
3.9.3.1 The Line Route a)
Proposed Alteration One of the two proposed alterations in the EHV transmission system relating to the Susquehanna Steam Electric System is a change in the 500 kV line route from the Susquehanna-Lackawanna Substation connection, to a Susquehanna-Stanton Substation connection.
This change shortens the original line route. Otherwise, the line route for the Susquehanna-Stanton 500 kV line is coincident with a portion of the Susquehanna-Lackawanna 500 kV line route as discussed in Section [3.2 Transmission Lines) of the July, 1972 Report.
b)
Susquehanna-Lackawanna 500 kV Line Route The Susquehanna-Lackawanna line was planned as a 500 kV line (initiallyto be operated at 230 kV) to connect the Susquehanna Steam Electric Station near Berwick, Pennsylvania, with the Lackawanna 500 kV substation.
This line was to run in a north-easterly direction for approximately 44 miles. Along this route the line was to pass near the Hunlock Station, the Mountain Substation and the Stanton Substation before proceeding on to the Lackawanna Substation.
A detailed description of the full line route is given in Section
[3.2.9.1 Route Description/P. 3.2 15] of the July, 1972 Report, and is shown geographically in Figure 3.9-A of this report.
c)
Proposed Susquehanna-Stanton 500 kV Line The proposed Susquehanna-Stanton 500 kV line will follow a coincident route with the Susquehanna-Lackawanna 500 kV line to that point at which the latter passes near the Stanton 230-66 kV Substation. At that point, the Susquehanna-Stanton line will enter and terminate at the Stanton Substation. Total length of the line will be approximately 30.2 miles.
The Susquehanna-Stanton 500 kV line route is shown with the Susquehanna-Lackawanna line route in Figure 3.9-A of this report.
d)
Reduction Of Environmental Impact Area The environmental impacts expected to be associated with the Susquehanna-Stanton 500 kV line are substantially less than those that would be expected to be associated with the original Susquehanna-Lackawanna 500 kV line. The major factor contributing to the lesser impact is the reduction in line length from 44.2 miles to 30.2 miles.
In eliminating that portion of the original line continuing from the Stanton Substation to the Lackawanna Substation, the impact along 14.0 miles of right-of-way and adjacent area is entirely avoided.
3.9.3.2 Right-Of-Way Data The Susquehanna-Stanton 500 kV line traverses a total length of 159,424 feet. Of this total length, 94,797 feet of the line requires a right-of-way 200 feet in width. The other 64,626 feet of line is to parallel an existing PP&L right-of-way, thus requiring only an additional 150 feet in width beyond the existing right-of-way. The total area of additional land required for the line is 657.75 acres.
3.94
3.9.3.3
.Terrestrial IVildlife There are no rare or endangered species of terrestrial wildlifefound along the line route according to the Luzerne County District Game Protector [Section 3.2.9.3 Wildlife/P.
3.2 20 and 21]. Important game species in the area include white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus), eastern cottontail (Sylvilagus floridanus), snowshoe hare (Lepus americanus),
wild turkey (Meleagris galapavo), ruffed grouse (Bonasa umbellus), gray squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis),
fox squirrel (Sciurus niger),
mourning dove (Zenaida macroura),
and woodchuck (Marmota monax).
3.9.3.4 Land Cover The line passes through an area of predominately forest cover and limited pasture and cultivated crop cover. Approximately 24 miles of the right-of-way are presently forested with the remaining six miles in open land. Areas south of the line route along the river support several large population centers.
a)
Forest Cover Dominant forest cover consists of a highly diverse mixture of hardwoods and several conifers with the exception of hemlock (Tsuga canadensis) which forms nearly pure stands on north facing slopes. Elsewhere, dominant overstory species include red, white, and chestnut oaks (Quercus spp.),
red, white, yellow, and gray birch (Betula spp.),
aspen (Populus spp.), and red and sugar maple (Acer spp.). The dominant conifers are hemlock and white pine (Pinus strobus). Dominant understory species consist of sassafras (Sassafras albidum),
mountain laurel (Kalmia latifolia), rhododendron and azalea (Rhododendron spp.)
and blackberry (Rubus allegheniensis)
~
American chestnut (Castenea dentata) represents the only unique flora noted in the area. This tree, while somewhat rare, is not endangered and will not be affected by a transmission line.
b)
Crop Cover See Section 3.9.3.5 below.
c)
Other Land Covers There are no appreciable areas of land cover other than forest and crop cover within the proposed right-of-way.
3.9.3.5 Land Use, And 3.9.3.6 Demography The present patterns of land use and demography in the environs about the line remain substantially unchanged from those described in regard to segments one through three of the Susquehanna-Lackawanna 500 kV line. A detailed discussion of land use and demographic patterns is given in the July, 1972 Report, Section [3.2.9.2 Segment One 3.9 5
Susquehanna to Hunlock Creek/Land Use, Population, Agriculture/P. 3.2 16], Section
[3.2.9.3 Segment Two Hunlock Creek to Toby Creek/Land Use, Population, Agriculturel P. 3.2 19 and 20], and Section [3.2.9.4 Segment Three Toby Creek to Susquehanna River/Land Use, Population, Agriculture/P. 3.2 21 and 22]
~
3.9.3.7 Areas Of Clearing And Structure Removal I
The line will cross 126,650 linear feet of woodlands with a right-of-way width of 200 feet required where the line does not parallel the existing right-of-way, and 150 feet where the existing line is paralleled. However, clearing will be restricted to danger trees (i.e.,
those trees which pose a hazard to line operation and other woody vegetation which must be removed to provide access along the line). Hence, clearing will not consist of a 200 foot swath through wooded areas, but rather will be very selective, removing only that vegetation which is necessary for construction and safe operation of the line. There will be no existing structures removed by the line.
3.9.3.8 Special Features a)
Historical Resources There are no sites within one mile of the line which are registered with the National Register of Historic Places.
The nearest registered site is in Forty-Fort, approximately two miles south of the line. The Pennsylvania Historical Site Files housed at the Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission lists two areas of historical significance.
The Union Reform and Lutheran Church (1833) is located in Wapwallopen. This site is located approximately two miles south of the proposed line.
The second a'rea of historical significance is a
canal located north of the Wapwallopen Church
- site, across the Susquehanna River and on the West Bank. This waterway was part of the old North Branch Canal of the Susquehanna Canal System which is now in disrepair. These two sites are noted respectively as historic areas No. 1 and No. 2 on Figure [3.2.10] of the July, 1972 Report.
b)
Archaeological Resources According to the National Register of Historic Places, no nationally registered
. archaeological sites are located within the vicinityof the proposed line.
A review of the archaeological site file housed at the Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission resulted in the location of a number of archaeological sites within the general area of the proposed line, but no known sites are located within 1/2 mile of the proposed line.
3.9.4 Alternative Line Routes And Selection Criteria Alternative line routes and selection criteria with respect to the planning of the Susquehanna-Lackawanna 500 kV line are discussed in Section [8.6.1.1] of the July, 1972 3.9.6
Report. The selection of the particular route for the Susquehanna-Stanton 500 kV line is based upon the same criteria as used for the initial layout of the coincident portion of the Susquehanna-Lackawanna 500 kV line.
3.9.5 Electrical Environmental Characteristics A considerable amount of new information on the electrical environmental characteristics of the proposed 500 kV transmission line has been compiled since the issuance of the July, 1972 Report. The electrical environmental effects of the line are discussed in detail in this subsection.
These effects are discussed in terms of: 1) corona (3.9.5.1),
2) ozone and oxides of nitrogen (3.9.5.2),
- 3) audible noise (3.9.5.3),
4) electromagnetic influence (3.9.5A),
and 5) public safety (3.9.5.5).
The information contained herein supercedes Section
[3.2.2.3 Radio and Television Interference/Audible Noise/P 3.2 7 and 8] of the July, 1972 Report in its entirety.
A thorough assessment of the electrical environmental effects of the proposed 500 kV line and existing 230 kV lines requires a detailed evaluation of the various electrical effects on the environment.
All HV and EHV alternating current overhead transmission lines may produce several types of electrical effects resulting from corona, electromagnetic, and electrostatic inductions.
In general, the incidence and magnitude of these effects will depend upon the following:
(1) line to line voltage (2) conductor type (3) conductor surface condition (4) line geometry (5) meteorological conditions (6) line loading'nd to a lesser extent on constr'uction and maintenance practices used during and after line construction.
The electrical environmental effects which may be produced by corona include:
(1) generation of ozone and oxides of nitrogen (2) audible noise emission (3).
radio and television influence The electrical effects of transmission line inductions include:
(1) electrostatically induced voltages and/or currents (2) electromagnetically induced voltages and/or currents Approximately 40 percent of the proposed line will be'paralleled by existing 230 kV transmission facilities. Part of the paralleled section consists of two 230 kV vertical doublmircuit structures and the remainder consists of single 230 kV vertical doublmircuit structures.
In order to determine the total impact of the various effects mentioned above, the contributions from the existing 230 kV transmission facilities have been examined. The structure relationships within the three different corridors are shown in Figures 3.9-B thru 3.9-D. Unless otherwise noted, distances given in the text are referenced from the following points:
3.9-7
(1)
(2) single structure corridor: centerline of structure multiple structure corridors:
a point one-half the distance between the centerline of the 500 kVstructure and the nearest 230 kV structure.
3.9.5.1 Corona Corona is a localized partial electric discharge that occurs when the electric field strength (voltage gradient) on the surface of an energized overhead transmission line conductor exceeds the critical gradient in air. The energy dissipated during corona is derived from the conductors.
Consequently, from the viewpoint of the transmission line, it constitutes a loss, commonly known as "corona loss." Corona loss depends upon conductor surface gradient, operating voltage, line design, weather conditions and conductor surface conditions. Corona loss calculations for the proposed line were made using the base case method for two probabilities and are shown in Table 3.9-A (EPRI, 1975). Corona during most fair weather conditions is generally small and for all practical purposes is negligible.
However, during foul weather conditions, (rain, fog, snow, etc.) corona is not negligible.
In the following subsections, the magnitude of the effects associated with corona for the proposed line design are discussed.
Assessment of the anticipated effect on the environment and people is developed in Section 5.5.
3.9.5.2 Ozone And Oxides OfNitrogen Chemically, ozone is 03, a special type of oxygen molecule containing 3 atoms.
Ozone is produced naturally by lightning discharges and solar radiation reacting with hydrocarbon airborne molecules prevalent over metropolitan areas (Scherer, 1972). Corona can also produce ozone and oxides of nitrogen in the air surrounding the conductor. The production and the diffusion of these effluents depend on corona loss, average conductor height, line orientation in relation to wind direction, wind speed and other meteorological conditions.
Man-made production of nitrogen oxides is more difficult because higher energies are required than for ozone production (Frydman, 1972). Consequently production rates of oxides of nitrogen are at least an order of magnitude smaller than for ozone (U.S.D.H.E.W., 1970).
Significant naturally produced and man-made levels of ozone and oxides of nitrogen have been measured (Scherer, 1972). These levels are caused in part by the solar induced Atmospheric Nitrogen Dioxide Photolytic Cycle causing maximum levels of ozone of 0.500 parts per million at elevations of approximately 20 kilometers (Ibid). High concentrations of ozone and nitrogen dioxide are produced when the products of incomplete combustion of hydrocarbon fuels (gasoline, coal, etc.) react in the sunlight (Ibid;
- Frydman, 1972). Also great quantities of nitrogen dioxide are released in the natural decomposition (bacterial action) of organic matter.
Ozone concentrations have been measured as high as 0.240 parts per million in large metropolitan areas (Scherer, 1972).
Nitrogen dioxide concentrations have been measured as high as 0.560 parts per million 1-hour average in large metropolitan areas (Frydman, 1972).
d.9.8
The State of Pennsylvania has no emission rate standards for transmission lines and none have been reported in the literatures of CIGRE (International Conference on Large Electrical Systems),
ANSI (American National Standards Institute), or the IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers). Therefore in PPSL's uses, the standards that apply for ozone and oxides of nitrogen are the Environmental Protection Agency's Ambient Air Quality Standards.
These standards specify limits on the photochemical oxident (ozone) concentration to a level of 0.080 parts per million by volume maximum 1-hour concentration not to be exceeded more than once per year.
The EPA has also adopted standards for ambient concentrations of oxides of nitrogen (USEPA, Air Pollution Control Office, 1971). These standards limit nitrogen
. dioxide concentrations to 100 micrograms per cubic meter (0.05 parts per million) annual arithmetic mean concentration.
Extensive field and laboratory investigations have been conducted by several electric utilities and research institutions to determine the level of ozone emissions from EHV lines. During a one year period from October 1970 to October 1971 a joint field measurement program was undertaken by the American Electric Power Service Corporation (AEP) and.the Battelle Memorial Institute for the purpose of determining whether ozone emissions from 765 kV lines would contribute significantly to existing ozone levels (Frydman, 1972). A similar study was made by the Illinois Institute of Technology and Research during a
19 month period from 1971 to 1972 (Fern, 1974).
In addition, laboratory studies instituted by AEP in cooperation with Ohio State University were carried out to determine production and decay rates of ozone at gradient'levels equal to or greater than those levels found on practical transmission lines (Sebo, 1972; Roach, 1973). Allof the above studies concluded that there are no adverse environmental impacts due to gaseous emissions from transmission lines.
An ozone survey conducted by the Environmental Sciences Division of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory obtained measurements at selected points on the reservation including points under a 500 kV transmission line (Auerbach, S.l., 1973). Background levels of 0.02 PPM were recorded with values under the transmission line ranging from 0.021 to 0.034 PPM. On one occasion values as high as 0.230 PPM were measured.
This extremely high level was attributed to a temperature inversion.
This survey indicates that it may be possible for pockets of ozone to form under meteorological conditions favorable to the formation of temperature inversions.
The maximum 'I-hour concentrations of ozone have been estimated by analytical methods.
Each of the three corridor configurations were examined and the results are given in Table 3.9-8 for the conditions noted.
The maximum 24-hour average of oxides of nitrogen above ambient is given for the left and right edges of right-of-way for each of the corridor configurations in Table 3.9-C.
Section 5.5.1.1 indicates that the low levels of ozone and oxides of nitrogen produced due to the cumulative effect of both the 500 kV and 230 kV lines are well below the maximum levels recommended by the EPA.
3.9.9
3.9.5 3 Audible Noise All 500 kV overhead transmission line conductors may be sources of audible noise consisting of crackling sounds, broadband noise and pure tone hum. The type and intensity of this effect depends on the conductor surface gradient, the conductor surface condition, the amount of moisture on the conductor, and the local meteorological conditions. The following investigation of audible noise emission considers the possible effects on the comfort of the public near the transmission line right-of-way.
Crackling sounds are produced during fair weather and foul weather conditions.
Except at very high surface gradients, audible noise from transmission lines during fair weather is approximately the same as the surrounding ambient noise. However, during fair
- weather, conductor surface imperfections, insects, dirt, burrs, scratches and any other sharply pointed particles may be points where the air, normally an insulating medium, is overstressed and locally conducts electricity in the form of a spark causing the crackling.
During periods of wet weather, broadband noise occurs. When the conductor surface is wet, water droplets on the conductor are stressed electrically. When they leave the conductor surface in the form of corona streamers, they also produce the crackling noises.
The occurrence and intensity of these noises depends on the conductor surface condition, the electric field intensity and the number of water droplets and their location on the conductor surface.
Pure tone hum is essentially a wet conductor phenomena and is most pronounced during periods of high corona loss. The hum is produced by the movement of the space charges produced by conductor corona.
Transmission line audible noise sound pressure levels are expressed in dBA using a standard reference pressure of 20 micronewtons per square meter.
The "A" weighted response is similar to that of the human ear and is widely used as a single number rating for audible noise.
The highest audible noise emission from overhead lines occurs during heavy rain conditions. Under these conditions, the general ambient noise will greatly increase due to the falling rain. Also under these conditions a reduction in public activity near the line is expected.
Lesser audible noise emission from overhead lines occurs during light rain or fog conditions. However, under these conditions there will be no increase in the general ambient noise nor should there be any reduction in public activity near the line.
In view of this, audible noise emission during fog or light rain is probably the worst condition.
For the purposes of this report, this condition will be called the wet conductor condition.
(a)
Evaluation Of The Audible Noise Impact On The Environment Evaluation of the corona produced audible noise from EHV overhead transmission lines depends upon:
(1) land use designation for noise control (2) ambient audible noise prior to line energization (3) acceptable levels of audible noise emission 3.9.10
(4) lateral distance to right-of-way (5) magnitude of transmission line audible noise The transmission line route generally passes through rural areas consisting of farmland and forests (See Table 3.9-D). Typical ambient audible noise levels along the corridor may be expected to range from approximately 35 dBA in farmland and parkland to more than 45 dBA in industrial and commercial areas.
In order to evaluate the impact of transmission line audible noise, the Bonneville Power Administration developed a
general guideline based upon public response to transmission line audible noise (Perry, 1972). According to this study numerous complaints may be received if line noise exceeds 58.5 dBA and few complaints will result if audible noise is limited to 52.5 dBA.
Figure 3.9-E illustrates in more detail the public response typically to be expected for various audible noise levels in a variety of land use types. The noise criteria is based on the quality of speech communication in relation to the background level and distance between the speaker and stations of 20 feet. The relationships shown in Figure 3.9-F are for young adults with normal hearing, speaking the same dialect. Persons under 13 years of age, people over 65 years of age, hard of hearing persons, and people communicating with dialect differences are likely to require even quieter conditions.
(b)
Audible Noise Analysis Of The Proposed 500 kV Transmission Line The anticipated audible noise emission from the various designs for the 500 kV transmission lines have been estimated using an analytical method for wet conductor conditions and for heavy rain conditions (EPRI, 1975).
The anticipated audible noise emission from the proposed 500 kV design is shown in Table 3.9-E. These are the maximum levels that would be expected with the indicated phasing and voltages under wet conductor conditions.
When the conductors are wet (periods of light rain or snow, extended periods of fog), the audible noise from the line will be approximately the level in Figures 3.9-G, 3.9-H and 3.9-I (Wet Conductor). For periods of heavy rain the audible noise of the transmission lines will be approximately the same levels as labeled Heavy Rain in these figures.
As discussed in Section 5.5.1.2 the environmental impact of audible noise from the proposed transmission line is expected to be minimal.
3.9.5.4 Electromagnetic Influence Corona from overhead EHV transmission lines may also produce electromagnetic influence especially during heavy rain, heavy fog, and other periods of inclement weather.
This influence is present over most of the radio communication spectrum and may affect the quality of reception of radio and television signals near the right-of-way. The level of influence is expressed in terms of dB referenced to one micro-volt per meter (dBu).
Gap type discharges also produce radio influence. However, these are localized from conductor to line hardware, hardware to hardware, etc., and may be easily and quickly detected. The hardware may then either be repaired or replaced. Also, use of the following 3.9-11
practices during the design and construction of the circuit will help to eliminate gap type discharge sources of audible noise:
(1) proper selection of major components (2) specify and apply adequate mechanical loading Influence on standard FM broadcast radio reception is generally not a problem.
The reasons for this are two-fold:
(1) corona generated radio influence decreases in magnitude with increasing frequency and is quite small in the FM broadcast band (88 to 108 MHz), and (2) the excellent interference rejection properties inherent in FM radio systems make them virtually immune to amplitude type disturbances.
(a)
Radio Influence Analysis Of The Proposed 500 kV Transmission Lines The radio influence (Rl) from the proposed 500 kV line has been calculated for foul weather conditions using an analytical method (EPRI, 1975). The fair weather radio influence will be approximately 22 dB below the foul weather value (Ibid).
A foul weather level of 74 dBu (Table 3.9-F) was calculated for the edge of right-of-way nearest to the 500 kV line. This value is constant along the entire route as there is no significant contribution at this distance from the 230 kV cir'cults. Moreover, this holds true for the opposite edge of right-of-way as the RI is primarily determined by the nearer of the 230 kV structures. The Rl level from the 230 kV structure is approximately 71 dBu at the edge of right-of-way during foul weather conditions.
In order to maintain good AM radio reception a signal to noise ratio of 24 dB is recommended.
During fair weather an antenna located at the edge of the right-of-way could be expected to give good reception quality for all those stations having signal strengths of 76 dBu or better. This represents 52.0 dBu of radio influence during fair weather (74 dBu-22 dB) plus a 24 dB signal to noise ratio. Figures 3.9-J & K indicate the levels of foul weather Rl,with respect to lateral distance from the 230 kV transmission line and the 500 kV transmission line respectively.
(b)
Television Influence Television Influence (TVI) is generally a visual disturbance in the television broadcast band. It may be seen as bands of speckled interference rolling upwards from the bottom of the screen.
The TVI produced by corona is summarized by the Institute of Electrical and Electronic En'gineers Subcommittee on Radio Noise as follows:
"No confirmed data exists which would in fair weather point to the conductor as a source of interference in the television frequencies" (IEEE, Radio Noise Subcommittee, 1971).
However, corona from the proposed 500 kV line during foul weather and times of peak voltages (positive cycle) may produce some measurable television influence known as "Precipitation television influence" where there is moisture on the conductors resulting from precipitation, fog, etc. This precipitation type television influence is a distributed phenomena.
3.9-12
There are few methodologies for predeterming precipitation type television influence. An effort has been made to correlate precipitation type television influence with foul weather radio influence. For 500 kV lines precipitation type television influence has been found to be less than 2 percent of Foul Weather radio influence (23 dB above 1
microvolt per meter) at a point 200 feet from the outermost conductor (Clark, 1970). This low value is not expected to cause any significant television disturbance.
(c)
Other Communication Facilities Corona producing electromagnetic interference on communication facilities such as telephone lines and railroad communications and others will be analyzed on an individual basis, due to the unique problems and solutions associated with each case. PP&L will take necessary measures to reduce electromagnetic interference to acceptable levels.
3.9.5 5 Public Safety Regardless of voltage
- class, all overhead, energized, load carrying transmission lines have an associated electric field and magnetic field. These two fields and their effects are virtually independent of each other and may be analyzed separately. To analyze these fields it is necessary to consider two coupling modes:
(1)
Electrostatic Induction voltages induced by energized conductors by capacitive coupling (2)
Electromagnetic Induction voltages induced by current carrying conductors These coupling modes may be capable of causing harm in the followingways:
('I)
Electric shocks that in themselves may cause physical harm (2)
Unexpected, electrically harmless shocks which may cause involuntary responses which may result in unsafe acts (a)
Electrostatic Induction Effects E lectrostatic effects may be present when objects possessing conductive characteristics (including people) are insulated from ground and near an electrically energized overhead conductor. The effects would be caused by electric (electrostatic) fields which surround all energized conductors.
The four general techniques which can be used to reduce electrostatic effects are:
(1) increasing the distance between the energized conductor and object (2) grounding the object (3) use of shielding (4) proper phase arrangement Extensive research on electrostatic effects has been performed at special test facilities and by various electric utilities. This research has resulted in a number of publications discussing the effects of electrostatic fields on metallic objects, such as fences, gutters and vehicles (IEEE Working Group, 1971; Deno, 1974; Reiner, 1972). Methods for calculating these effects have also been presented.
Other research addresses the effects of 3.9-13
electric fields and currents in people (Singlewald, 1973; Daziel, 1972; Hubbard, 1973).
Safeguards are considered in papers'y Hubbard and the IEEE Working Group 'on "Electrostatic Effects of Overhead Transmission Lines" (Hubbard, 1973; IEEE Working Group, 1973).
The intensity of the electric fields at ground level is expressed in units of kilovolts" per meter. It has been determined that an aver'age person will feel a slight tingling sensation when exposed to an electric field having an intensity of 15 kilovolts per meter or greater (Reiner, 1972). This electric field intensity is called the "perception level" or the "threshold of sensation."
Dalziel has studied the effects of current on people and has determined that the let-go current is 6 milliamperes (mA) for 99.5% of the women tested and the let-go current for 99.5% of the men tested is 9 mA (Dalziel, 1972). The let-go current is defined as the maximum current a person can tolerate and can still release an energized conductor by using muscles directly stimulated by that current.
The proposed 7th edition of the National Electrical Safety Code (232,D,3.C) recommends that the maximum electrostatic short circuit current be limited to 5 milliamperes root mean square (RMS) if the largest anticipated vehicle under the line were short circuited to ground.
A large vehicle having the dimensions of 8 feet wide, 44 feet long and 12 feet high located parallel to the transmission line, on dry pavement, and in an electrostatic field of 6.7 kV/m or less willsustain a short circuit current no greater than 5 mA (Deno, 1974) ~ Thus, in general, for most highway applications a peak electrostatic field of less than 6.5 kV/m would be acceptable.
The Johns Hopkins University conducted a 9-year medical study on 10 linemen working in close proximity of HV and EHV lines and reported their conclusion:
"The health of these 10 men has not been changed in any way by their exposure to HV (345 kV) lines..." (Singlewald, 1973).
Another area for concern arises for EHV transmission lines passing close to parking areas or service stations where combustible vapors may be present.
It has been reported in the literature -that gasoline vapors may theoretically be ignited by spark discharges having an energy greater than 0.25 millijoule (Deno, 1974).
Unless vapors are confinednatural wind currents would tend to reduce vapor concentrations so that no ignition problems would exist (IEEE Working Group, 1971). This reasoning is reinforced since not a single case confirming gasoline ignition due to power lines has been reported in the published literature.
The maximum values of the ground level electrostatic gradient have been analytically determined for the proposed 500 kV line. The values are shown in Table 3.9-G for the three corridor configurations.
Figures 3.9-L thru N are plots showing the magnitude of the electric field with respect to lateral distance for each of the three corridor sections.
~ PP&L presently has approximately, 110 miles of transmission line operating at 500 kV with no significant problems reported due to the electrostatic field. With the expansion of the 500 kV system similar operating performance is expected.
3.9-14
(b)
Electromagnetic Induction Effects Any current carrying conductor has a magnetic field, The intensity of this field is directly proportional to the magnitude of the current flowing in the conductor, the length of the conductor, and the power system frequency and inversely proportional to the lateral'istance-away from the conductor.
If this current is an alternating current and the conductor is paralled by a second conductor a voltage will.be induced on the second conductor.
Some methods which are of practical value in reducing electromagnetic effects are:
(1) increasing the distance between the energized conductor and object (2) grounding the object (IEEE Working Group, 1973).
The strength of a magnetic field is commonly expressed in units of Webers per square meter or Gauss. This report will deal in units of Gauss, 1 Gauss being equal to 0.0001 Weber per square meter.
Studies have been made and are in progress to evaluate the effects of low frequency magnetic fields on human beings. Two recent studies were made by Johns Hopkins University and the Naval Aerospace Medical Institute (Singlewald, 1973; Beischer, 1973). The study by Johns Hopkins University concluded that no ill effects could be determined due to exposure to high voltage transmission lines. The second study subjected 10 men to fields of 1 Gauss at 45 Hz for periods of up to 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> during a 7-day period.
This study concluded that there were no effects which could be attributed to the magnetic field. However, 9 of the 10 subjects showed an increase in serum triglycerides within 48 hours5.555556e-4 days <br />0.0133 hours <br />7.936508e-5 weeks <br />1.8264e-5 months <br /> after exposure. This could not be definitely linked to the magnetic field.
Electronic pacemakers have been found to show minor temporary rate changes that were clinically insignificant when the patients were exposed to fields of 1.35 Gauss Peak (Symth, 1972; Bridges, 1971). Allthe pacers remained within clinically safe limits and none of the 53 patients could feel any physical change. For comparison purposes a common heating pad generates a field of 2 Gauss (Beischer, 1973).
The IEEE Working Groups in Electromagnetic and Electrostatic Effects of Transmission Lines have prepared a report dealing with problems and safeguards relating specifically to transmission lines (IEEE Working Group, 1973). This paper addresses itself mainly to problems encountered by utility personnel in the maintenance and construction of transmission lines, however, many of the corrective measures have general application and could be applied to fences, irrigation pipe, gas pipelines and other conducting objects.
Electromagnetic hazards to the public can be eliminated by increased spacing and proper grounding procedures.
The values of the strength of the electromagnetic field under the proposed 500 kV transmission line have been estimated using an analytical method for the maximum loading condition of 3470 amperes per phase. Where the 500 kV line is to parallel existing 230 kV circuits a maximum load current of 1640 amperes per phase is assumed for the 230 kV lines. The electromagnetic field was calculated at ground level and at an elevation of 10 feet above ground for each of'the three corridor configurations. The results of these studies are shown in Table 3.9-H.
3.9.15
At ground level the maximum value occurs in the two structure corridor. This level is estimated to be 0.6 Gauss and occurs at the centerline of the 500 kV circuit. At 10 feet above ground the level increases and the maximum occurs in the three structure corridor. This value is approximately 0.9 Gauss and occurs at 8 feet outside the centerline of the 500 kV circuit. Figures 3.9-0 thru Q are plots showing the magnitude of the field with respect to lateral distance for each corridor section.
As discussed in Subsection 5.5.'l.4 for the conditions noted, it is the opinion of PP&L that the values of the electromagnetic field calculated for the proposed 500 kV lines are safe for man.
3.9-16,
3.9.6 References Anderson, J. G. and Zaffanella, L. E., "Project EHV Test Line Research on the Corona Performance of a Bundle Conductor at 'l000 kV", IEEE Transmission on Power Apparatus and Systems, pp. 223-232, January/February 1972.
- Beischer, D. E., Grissett, J. D., and Mitchell, R. E., "Exposure of Man to Magnetic Fields Alternating at Extremely Low Frequency",
Bureau of Medicine and Surgery MF51.524.015-0013B EOX, July 30, 1973.
Bridges, J. E.; Brueschke, E. E.; Kaye, M. P.; Miller, D. A.; Port, C. D.; Schwab, R. B.;
Valentino, A. R.; and Weyer, J. R., "Susceptibility of Cardiac Pacemakers to ELF Magnetic Fields", Technical Memorandum No.
'I IIT Research Institute Project E-6185, Prepared for U.S. Naval Electronic Systems Command, April 1971.
Clark, C. F. and Loftness, M. D., "Some Observations of Foul Weather EHV Television Interference", Transactions Paper 70-TP-104-PWR, Presented at 1970 Winter Power Meeting in New York, January 25-30, 1970.
Dalziel, C. F., "Electric Shock Hazards", IEEE Spectrum, February 1972, pp. 41-50.
Deno, D. W., "Calculating Electrostatic Effects of Overhead Transmission Lines", Paper No.
T-74-0865. To be presented at the 1974 Winter Power Meeting in New York. Also to be published in Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.
Edison Electric Institute, "EHVTransmission Line Reference Book", New York, New York, 1968.
Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), "Transmission Line Reference Book, 345 kV-and Above", Palo Alto, California, 1975
- Fern, W. J.,- Barbets, R.
I., "Field Investigation of Ozone Adjacent to High Voltage Transmission Lines", IEEE Transactions Paper T74-057-6, Paper Presented to IEEE PES=
Winter Meeting in New York, New York, January 27-February 1, 1974.
- Frydman, Levy and Miller, "Oxidant Measurements in the Vicinity of Energized 765 kV Lines", Transactions Paper T-72-551-0, Presented at 1972 Summer Power Meeting in San Francisco in July, 1972.
Gary, Moreau, "Predetermination of the Rl Level of High Voltage Transmission Lines: Part I Predetermination of the Excitation Function", IEEE Paper No. 71 TP 661, Presented at the 1971 Summer Power Meeting, Portland, Oregon, 1971.
3.9-17
Gary, Moreau, "Predetermination of the Rl Level of the High Voltage Transmission Lines:
Part II Field Calculating Method", IEEE Paper No. 71 TP 662, Presented at the 1971 Summer Power Meeting, Portland, Oregon, 1971.
- Hubbard, D. C., "Providing Protection Against Electric Shock During Line Construction",
Conference Paper C-73-520-4, Paper Presented at 1973 Summer Power Meeting in Vancouver, Canada, July 15-20, 1973.
IEEE Radio Noise Subcommittee Report, "Radio Noise Design Guide for High-Voltage Transmission Lines", IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, Vol. PAS-90, No. 2, March-April 1971, pp. 833-841
~
IEEE Working Group, "Electromagnetic Effects of Overhead Transmission Lines, Practical
- Problems, Safeguards and Methods of Calculation", Paper T-73-441-3, Paper Presented at 1973 Summer Power Meeting in Vancouver, B.C. Canada, July 15-20, 1973.
IEEE Working Group, "Electrostatic Effects of Overhead Transmission Lines", Part I and II, Transactions Paper 71-TP-G44-PWR, Presented at 1971 Summer Power Meeting in Portland, Oregon, 1971.
- Juette, G. W., Zaffanella, L. E., "Radio Noise, Audible Noise, and Corona Loss of EHV and UHV Transmission Lines Under Rain; Predetermination Based on Cage Tests",
IEEE Transactions on. Power Apparatus and Systems, pp. 1168-1178, July-August, 1970.
- LaForest, J.
J.,
- Baretsky, M., Jr.,
MacCarthy, D.
D., "Radio Noise Levels of EHV Transmission Lines Based on Project EHV Research",
IEEE Paper TP-65-706, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, pp.
1213-1230, Vol. PAS-85, No.
12, December, 1966.
Perry, D. E., "An Analysis of Transmission Line Audible Noise Levels Based upon Field and Three-Phase Test Line Measurements",
IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, pp. 857-865, May-June, 1972.
- Reiner, G.
L., "Electrostatic Effects near HVAC Transmission Line: Field Tests and Computer
- Roach, Chatier and
- Dietrich, "Experimental Oxidant Production Rates for EHV Transmission Lines and Theoretical Estimates of Ozone Concentrations Near Operating Lines", Transactions Paper T-73-414-0, Paper Presented at 1973 Summer Power Meeting in Vancouver, Canada, July 15-20, 1973.
3.9-18
- Scherer, Shih and Ware, "Gaseous Effluents Due to EHV Transmission Line Corona",
Transaction Paper No. T-72-550-2.
Presented at 1972 Summer Power Meeting in San Francisco, July, 1972.*
Sebo, Sweeney et al, "Measurements of Effluents Due to EHV Transmission Line Corona Laboratory Tests", Paper Presented at The Canadian Communication and EHV Conference, November, 1972.
Singlewald, M. L., Langworthy, O. R. and Kouwenhoven, W. B., "Medical Follow-up Study of HV Linemen Working in AC Electric Fields", IEEE Transaction of Power Apparatus and Systems, pp. 1307-1309, July/August 1973, Vol. PAS-92.
Smyth, N. P. D., M.D.; Keshishian, J. M., M.D.; Hood, O. CM.D.; Hoffman, A. A., M.D.;
- Baker, N. R.; and
- Podolak, E., "Effects of an Active Magnetometer on Permanently Implanted Pacemakers",
Journal of the American Medical Association, July 10, 1972.
U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, "AirQuality Criteria for Photochemical Oxidants", National Air Pollution Control Administration, Washington, D.C., March 1970.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), "AirQuality Criteria for Nitrogen Oxides",
AirPollution Control Office, Washington, D.C., January 1971.
U.S.
E nvironmental Protection Agency (EPA),
"Environmental Protection Agency Regulations on National Primary and Secondary Ambient Air Quality Standards",40 CFR 50; 36 FR 22384, November 25, 1971; as amended by 38 FR 25678, September 14, 1973.
3.9-19
Probability of Exceeding:
500 kV Line 230 kV Line 50%
8.9 2.8 0%
162.0 13.6 Conditions:
Lines operated at 110% of nominal voltage rating; conductors at minimum height (37'or 500 kV and 30'or 230 kV).
PENNSYLVANIAPOWER & LIGHTCOMPANY SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 APPLICANT'S ENVIRONMENTALREPORT AMENDMENT4 CALCULATEDCORONA LOSS IN KILOWATTSPER THREE PHASE MILE TABLE3.9-A 3.9-20
Corridor Section A.
500 kV B.
500kV and 230kV C.
500 kV and 2-230 kV
.009
.009
.010
.008
.010
.007 Edge of Right-of-Way Left Hand Right Hand Maximum
.013
.014
.015 Conditions:
Maximum corona loss, 2,5 mlle per hour stable wind along'5 mlle length of line, 110% of nominal voltage.
I PENNSYLVANIAPOWER & LIGHTCOMPANY SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 APPLICANT'S ENVIRONMENTALREPORT
, AMENDMENT4 CALCULATEDOZONE CONCENTRATIONS PARTS PER MILLION(1 HR)
TABLE3.9-B 3.9-21
Corridor Section Edge of Right-of-Way Left Hand Right Hand Maximum A.
500 kv B.
500 kV and 230 kV C.
500 kV and 2-230 kV
.00050
.00055
.00057
.00050
.00043
.00038
.00072
.00078
.00081 Conditions:
Maximum corona loss, 2.5 mlle per hour stable wind along 6 mlle length of line, 110'f nominal voltage.
PENNSYLVANIAPOWER 8t LIGHTCOMPANY SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 APPLICANT'S ENVIRONMENTALREPORT AMENDMENT4 CALCULATEDOXIDES OF NITROGEN CONCENTRATION TABLE3.9-C 3.9-22
CLASS A Residential Areas Mobile Home Parks Motels Commercial Living Accomodations Cottages Bungalows Dormitories Estates (with acreages)
CLASS B Camping Facilities Recreation and Entertainment Where persons communicate by speech Golf Courses Race Tracks Parks Private Hunting Lands Fishing Clubs Preserves State Lands CLASS C Agricultural Property Farms and Livestock Industrial Commercial CLASS AA Lands where the quality of serenity, tranquility and quiet are of extraordinary significance.
PENNSYLVANIAPOWER & LIGHTCOMPANY
'USQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION UNITS 'I AND 2 APPLICANT'S ENVIRONMENTALREPORT AMENDMENT4 TYPICALLAND USE CLASSIFICATIONS TABLE3.9-D 3.9.23
Corridor Section Wet Conductor Edge of Right-of-Way Left Hand Right Hand A.
500 Icv B. 500kVand230kV 58 58 58 55 C.
500 kV and 2 kV 63 52 Condltlons:
1101f of nornlnsl voltsgs; conductors st svsrsgs hslght.
PENNSYLVANIAPOWER & LIGHTCOMPANY SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 APPLICANT'S ENVIRONMENTALREPORT AMENDMENT4 CALCULATEDAUDIBLENOISE IN dB REFERENCES TO 20 MICRONEWTONS PER METER SQUARED TABLE 3.9.E 3.9-24
Corridor Section Fair Weather Edge of Right of-Way Left Hand Right Hand Foul Weather Edge of Right.of-Way Left Hand Right Hand A.
500 kv B.
500 kV and 230 kV C.
500 kV and 2.230 kV 52 52 53 49 49 74 74 74 74 71 71 Condltlontc 1 104k of nominal voltage; conductors st sversge height.
PENNSYLVANIAPOWER & LIGHTCOMPANY SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 APPLICANT'S ENVIRONMENTALREPORT AMENDMENT4 CALCULATEDRADIO INFLUENCE IN dB REFERENCED TO ONE MICRO.VOLT PER METER TABLE3.9-F 3.9-25
Corridor Section Edge of Right-of-Way Left Hand Right Hand Maximum A.
500 kv B.
500 kV and 230 kV C.
500 kV and 2.230 kV 1.68 1.73 1.72 1.68 0.88 0.84 7.8 7.8
7.7 Conditions
110% of nominal voltage; conductors at minimum halght.
PENNSYLVANIAPOWER & LIGHTCOMPANY SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 APPLICANT'S ENVIRONMENTALREPORT AMENDMENT4 CALCULATEDELECTROSTATIC GRADIENTS IN KILOVOLTSPER METER AT GROUND LEVEL TABLE 3.9-G 3.9.26
Corridor Section Ground Level
'IO Feet Above Ground Edge of Right-of-Way Edge of Right-of-Way Left Hand Right Hand Maximum Left Hand Right Hand Maximum A.
500 kv B.
500 kV and 230 kV 0.125 0.127 0.125 0.194 0.596 0.614 0.135 0.135 0.135 0.239 0.876 0.892 C.
500 kV and 2-230 kV 0.122 0.192 0.570 0.129 0.242 0.895 Conditions:
3470 amps per phase on the 600 kV line, 1640 amps per phase on the 230 kV line; conductors at minimum height.
PENNSYLVANIAPOWER 8t LIGHTCOMPANY SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 APPLICANT'S ENVIRONMENTALREPORT AMENDMENT4 CALCULATEDMAGNETICFIELD STRENGTH IN GAUSS TABLE3.9-H
HUNLOOK STATION IUGI)
MOUNTAIN SUBSTATION LUZERNE CO LACKAWANNACO.
STANTPN LACKAWANNA SES SUBSTATION SUSQUEHANNA SES Rior 0
WILKES BARRE gIIsII<~bann Nanticoke Pittston SCRANTON 0
MILES Sw t
t LkLi S ~
h S
t Li PENNSYLVANIAPOWER 5 LIGHTCOMPANY SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 APPLICANT'S ENVIRONMENTALREPORT AMENDMENT4 LINE ROUTE FIGURE 3.9-A
IOO IOO PENNSYLVANIAPOWER 8( LIGHTCOMPANY SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 APPLICANT'S ENVIRONMENTALREPORT AMENDMENT4 500 kV SINGLE CIRCUIT HOR IZONTALTRANSMISSION LINE: CORRIDOR WIDTH 200 FEET FIGURE 3.9-B
230 kV 500kV 0
Ol IOO 150 50 PENNSYLVANIAPOWER 5 LIGHTCOMPANY SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 APPLICANT'S ENVIRONMENTALREPORT AMENDMENT4 500 Icv SINGLE CIRCUIT HORIZONTALTRANSMISSION LINE AND 230 kv DOUBLE CIRCUIT VERTICAL TRANSMISSION LINE: CORRIDOR WIDTH 300 FEET FIGURE 3.9C
230 kv 230 kv 500kv 0
CU IOO IOO IOO IOd 5d PENNSYLVANIAPOWER 5 LIGHTCOMPANY SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 APPLICANT'S ENVIRONMENTALREPORT AMENDMENT4 500 kv SINGLE CIRCUIT TRANSMISSION LINEAND TWO, 230 Icv, DOUBLE CIRCUIT VERTICAL TRANSMISSION LINES'OR R IDOR WIDTH 450 FEET FIGURE 3.9-D
Vigorous community action Threats of community action Wide spread complaints Sporadic complaints No complaints Nfghttiuie limit
~55 c
cP I
c<
55 Sleep interference BPA data Daytime limitfor speech communications 60 65 s
Audible noise in d BIA)
I 70 75 Hearing daniage begins PENNSYLVANIAPOWER 8t LIGHTCOMPANY SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 APPLICANT'S ENVIRONMENTALREPORT AMENDMENT4 PUBLIC RESPONSE TO AUDIBLENOISE FIGURE 3.9-E 3.9-32
120 110 COMMUNICATION IMPOSSIBLE CO'o
.E 90
'D 80
'a C
CO 70 CO 60
'~jrA' oca/ Effort rC COMMUNICATION DIF F ICULT
"~% m@NNwQ.
Shout COMMUNICATION POSSI BLE 5I 50 40 0
'";AREAOF NEARLYNORMAL<;='i-"
s: SPEECH COMMUNICATION tk'~'gtkv',. itl<o 4 8 <'gaf r<sb.
'ga.m t:a<I 5
10 15 20 25 30 Talker to listener distance (feet)
PENNSYLVANIAPOWER & LIGHTCOMPANY SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 APPLICANT'S ENVIRONMENTALREPORT AMENDMENT4 QUALITYOF SPEECH COMMUNICATION F IGUR E 3.9-F 3.9-33
66 64 62 60 58 E
56 5
54 E
cv 52 ca 50
+~+L 0@
O~
48 46
-500
-400
-300
-200
-100 0
100 200
, 300 400 500 Lateral distance to the center line (feet)
PENNSYLVANIAPOWER & LIGHTCOMPANY SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 APPLICANT'S ENVIRONMENTALREPORT AMENDMENT4 AUDIBLENOISE OF HIGH VOLTAGETRANSMISSION LINES (AN PP&L 500 Icv SC HOR 2C/B HAVG COND AGAR 1.82 INCHES DIA.)
PIGURE 3.9-G 3.9-34
68 66 64 g
62
~
60 58 C:0 56 C0u 54 E
52 50 K
+
Og Cp Op 48 46 44 500
-400
-300
-200
-100 0
100 200 300 400 500 Lateral distance to the center line (feet)
PENNSYLVANIAPOWER & LIGHTCOMPANY SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 APPLICANT'S ENVIRONMENTALREPORT AMENDMENT4 AUDIBLENOISE OF HIGH VOLTAGETRANSMISSION LINES (AN PP&L 500 SC HOR &
253 kV DC VERT STANTON COR R)
- FIGURE 3.9-H 3.9-35
68 66 64, 62 8'0 E
58 8
.5 b
56 O
54 C)
CV 52 50 48 46
-500
-400
-300
-200
-100 0
100 200 300 400 Lateral distance to the center line (feet)
PENNSYLVANIAPOWER & LIGHTCOMPANY SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 APPLICANT'S ENVIRONMENTALREPORT AMENDMENT4 AUDIBLENOISE OF HIGH VOLTAGETRANSMISSION LINES (PP&L 500 kv SC HOR &
2-253 kV D/C VER STANTON CORR)
FIGURE 3.9-I 3.9-36
85 80 75 70 65 E
o 60 55
<o
'U 50 45 40 35
-400
-300
-200
-100 0
100 200 Horizontal distance to the center line (feet) 300 400 PENNSYLVANIAPOWER & LIGHTCOMPANY SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 APPLICANT'S ENVIRONMENTALREPORT AMENDMENT4 RADIO INFLUENCE OF HIGH VOLTAGETRANSMISSION LINES (RI PP&L DC VERT 253 I<V LAPWING 1.504 INCHES)
FIGURE 3.9J 3.9-37
95 90 85 80 75 0
70 E
Q) 65 60 55 50
-250
-200
-150
-100
-50 0
50 100 150 200 250 Horizontal distance to the center line (feet)
PENNSYLVANIAPOWER 5 LIGHTCOMPANY SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 APPLICANT'S ENVIRONMENTALREPORT AMENDMENT4 RADIO INFLUENCE OF HIGH VOLTAGETRANSMISSION LINES (RI PP&L SC HOR 550 Icv 2C/8 AGAR 19 1.82 INCHES DIA.)
FIGURE 3.9-K 3.9-38
5 4
s500
-400
-300
-200
-100 0
100 200 300 400 500 Lateral distance to the center line {feet)
PENNSYLVANIAPOWER & LIGHTCOMPANY SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 APPLICANT'S ENVIRONMENTALREPORT AMENDMENT4 ELECTRIC FIELD GRADIENTOF HIGH VOLTAGETRANSMISSION LINES (EFIELD PPSL 550 Icv 2C BUNDLE FOR HMIN~37'ONDAGAR 1.821 INCHES)
FIGURE 3.9-L 3.9-39
550 Icv 5
4 253 kv
-500
-400
-300
-200
-100 0
100 200 300 400 500 Lateral distance to the center line (feet)
PENNSYLVANIAPOWER 5 LIGHTCOMPANY SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 APPLICANT'S ENVIRONMENTALREPORT AMENDMENT4 ELECTRIC FIELD GRADIENT OF HIGH VOLTAGETRANSMISSION LINES (EFIELD PP&L 253 I(V DC VER 550 Icv SC HOR STANTON CORR)
F IGUR E 3.9-M 3.940
550 I(V 5
4 253 Icv 53 I<V
-400
-300
~200
-100 0
100 Lateral distance to the center line (feet) 200 300 PENNSYLVANIAPOWER & LIGHTCOMPANY SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 APPLICANT'S ENVIRONMENTALREPORT AMENDMENT4 ELECTRIC FIELD GRADIENTOF HIGH VOLTAGETRANSMISSION LINES (EFIELD PPSL 550 Icv SC HOR St 2-DC VERT 253 Icv LINES STANTON COR R IDOR)
~
FIGURE 3 9-N 3.9.41
550 Icv
-400
-300
-200
-100 0
100 Lateral distance from the center line (feet) 200 300 400 NOTE: MAGNETICFIELD ATA HEIGHT OF 10.0 FEET PENNSYLVANIAPOWER 5 LIGHTCOMPANY SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 APPLICANT'S ENVIRONMENTALREPORT AMENDMENT4 MAGNETICFLUX DENSITY PROFILE OF TRANSMISSION LINES (BFIELD PPSL 550 !<V SC 3470A STANTON CORR)
FIGURE 3.9-0 3.942
550 Icv 253 Icv
-400
-300
-200
-100 0
100 200 300 400 Lateral distance from the center line (feet)
NOTE: MAGNETIC FIELD AT A HEIGHT OF 10.0 FEET PENNSYLVANIAPOWER & LIGHTCOMPANY SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 APPLICANT'S ENVIRONMENTALREPORT AMENDMENT4 MAGNETICFLUX DENSITY PROFILE OF TRANSMISSION LINES (BFIELD PP&L 550 Icv SC 3470A 253 kV D/C 1640A STANTON CORR)
F IGUR E 3.9-P 3.9.43
1000 900 800 550 I<V 700 C) 600 U
C 500 400 X
300 200 253 Icv 253 Icv 100
~400
~300
-200
-100 0
100 Lateral distance from the center line (feet) 200 300 400 NOTE: MAGNETIC FIELD AT A HEIGHT OF 10.0 FEET PENNSYLVANIAPOWER & LIGHTCOMPANY SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 APPLICANT'S ENVIRONMENTALREPORT AMENDMENT4 MAGNETICFLUX DENSITY PROFILE OF TRANSMISSION LINES (BF IELD PAL 550 kV SC 3470A
. 253 Icv D/C 1640A STANTON COR R)
FIGURE 3.9-Q 3.9.44
PART III NRC CHAPTER 4 ENVIRONMENTALEFFECTS OF SITE PREPARATION, PLANT CONSTRUCTION, AND TRANSMISSION 4.2 TRANSMISSION FACILITIESCONSTRUCTION 4.2.1 Right-Of-Way Development The extent to which the environment is impacted by the construction of the transmission facility is dependent upon the particular techniques and practices used in the development of the right-of-way. Since the issuance of the Ju/y, 1972 Report, PP&L has adopted more restrictive right-of-way management specifications which willfurther help to mitigate environmental impacts along the right-of-way.
Relevant portions of these new specifications are provided in an appendix to this document and are specifically referenced in the appropriate sections of the text. These specifications include:
"Transmission Construction Specifications Development of Erosion Control Plan for Line Construction" (Exhibit A), "Vegetation Management Specifications for Initial Cutting, Removal and Trimming of Vegetation on or Adjacent to Electric Line Right-Of-Way" (Exhibit B), and "Vegetation Management Specifications for Installing Vegetation on or Adjacent to Electric Line Right-Of-Way and for General Landscaping" (Exhibit C).
4.2.1.1 Construction Techniques a)
Clearing The construction of the line will require clearing through wooded areas, building of access roads, removal of danger trees, erection of structures, and stringing of conductors.
Following the actual construction of the line, extensive restoration measures will be undertaken.
These will consist of timber and slash disposal, general clean-up such as grading and
- seeding, fence
- repair, and removal of temporary construction facilities.
These techniques are discussed in depth in Exhibits A, B and C of the Appendix.
4.2-1
b)
Access Roads Roads are constructed for access to each structure site. At each site the amount of grading for each structure will be kept at a minimum (refer to Exhibit A in Appendix) ~
c)
Foundation And Tower Erection The procedures used to transport and erect structures at specified locations along the right-of-way will vary according to terrain. The tubular steel H-frame 500 kV structures will be transported to the staging sites in several sections. The average length of the sections will be 65 feet. The cross arms for the structures will be brought in as one complete piece, 96 feet in length, The foundations for each of these structures will be constructed of reinforced concrete approximately eight feet in diameter and 20 feet in depth. Excavations will normally be performed by large truck or tractor mounted augers. In some instances, it may be necessary to utilize caissons in the excavations of these foundations.
d)
Conductor Stringing Insulator strings will be affixed while each structure is on the ground. Structures will then be erected and conductors will be pulled through stringing blocks by tensioning equipment.
During stringing operations, guard structures will be placed along all highway, railroad, and existing utility line crossings. The work will be carefully supervised to verify that it meets the specifications.
4.2.7.2 Clean-Up And Restoration a)
Disposal Of Timber And Slash Unless other arrangements are made, all logs and slash are the property of the land owner. In the event that a property owner does not want the logs or slash, the material will be disposed of in the following ways. Merchantable timber will be neatly stacked along the edge of the right-of-way in piles no longer than tree length and dispersed to allow wildlife movement and regrowth of vegetation cover.
Slashed and other cut materials may be stacked where conditions permit. Piles will be restricted in height, length, locations, and compaction to allow for movement around and cover for wildlife.Slash may be used to check erosion in intermittent drainages, but will be kept out of all water bodies, since cleared vegetation allowed to fall or be disposed of into water can alter water flow and increase biological oxygen demand (BOD). (Refer to Exhibit B, in Appendix) b)
Danger Trees Danger trees will be removed with minimum damage to the existing environment.
Pruning or topping of trees will be carried out in a professional manner. Tearing of bark and creation of open wounds will be avoided. All loose, broken or cut branches will be removed from the tree during the initial clearing. 'A company designated forester or environmental inspector with a thourough knowledge of the objectives of the project willsupervise cutting operations to assure conformance with PP&L's vegetation management specifications (refer to Exhibit B in Appendix).
4.2-2
c)
Restoration Restoration work required after construction cleanup primarily consists of landscaping methods such as tree and shrub transplanting, seeding of grasses and other ground covers, and the necessary site improvement and maintenance to assure survival and growth of plants. Additional restoration work would include pruning and methods to correct altered grades around preserved
- trees, mechanical damage to trunks of preserved trees, and compaction of soils near retained vegetation (refer to Exhibit B, and Exhibit C in Appendix) ~
d)
Fence Repair Any fences which require dismantling during construction will be repaired or replaced. Ifa fence should require moving because itwould block the right-of-way, it will be replaced with a new fence in an appropriate location where it will not interfere with the right-of-way (refer to Exhibit B, in Appendix).
e)
Removal Of Temporary Facilities All temporary construction facilities will be removed from the right-of-way upon completion of the line.
4.2.2 Impact On The Natural Environment 4.2.2.1 Geology Since all transmission facilities will be above ground, except for foundations, the underlying strata of the area will not be appreciably affected by the line. The concrete footings for the transmission structures will be approximately eight feet in diameter and 20 feet in depth. Drilling to such a depth will perforate bedrock but such activities will be confined to structure locations, having minimal or no impact on the overall geologic formations along the route.
4.2.2.2 Hydrology As with geology, the nature of an above-ground transmission line is such that it willnot appreciably affect the hydrology of the area.
4.2.2.3 Soils Being a mountainous area, the soils along the route are by nature thin and subject to erosion. This is a fact of most mountainous terrains and must be carefully dealt with in constructing a
transmission line. The very nature of transmission line construction necessitates the movement of heavy equipment via heavy machinery.
Therefore, soil compaction will occur in constructing the line wherever movement of heavy machinery occurs. The results of such compaction will alter the vegetation pattern. Some vegetation will be limited on severely compacted soils.
4.2-3
4.2.24 Terrestrial And Aquatic Communities The principal effects of constructing this Susquehanna-Stanton line on natural systems will be the removal of vegetation along the right-of-way and soil compaction. The removal of danger trees will eliminate shade tolerant species and promote vegetation which does well in sunlight. The impact up'on soils along the right-of-way is discussed above in Section 4.2.2.3.
In summary, soils which are traversed by construction vehicles will be compacted to an extent such that they may support a different vegetation community than is now present.
4.2.3 Impact On The Man-Made Environment 4.2.3.1 Land Use, And 4.2.3.2 Demography The potential impact of line construction on land use and demographic patterns are of two basic types: 1) direct physical disruption of the patterns, and 2) visual impact on the aesthetic character of the land use and demographic environment.
a)
Physical Disruption There are no significant changes in land use patterns (see Section 3.9.3.5),
therefore the nature of physical impacts remains similar to those discussed in reference to Segments One, Two, and Three of the Susquehanna-Lackawanna 500 kV line. These impacts are discussed in the July, 1972 Report: Section [3.2.9.2 Segment One Susquehanna SES to Hunlock CreeklLand
- Use, Population, Agriculture(P 3.2 16], Section
[3.2.9.3]
Segment Two Hunlock Creek to Toby Creek(Land Use, Population, Agriculture'.2 19 and 20], and Section [3.2.9.4 Segment Three Toby Creek to Susquehanna RiverlLand Use, Population, AgriculturelP 3.2 21 and 22].
b)
Visual Impact Since no persons are displaced by the line construction activities, the major impact is of a
visual nature.
Construction activity in the development of the Susquehanna-Stanton transmission facility will adversely affect the visual character of approximately 14.2 miles of right-of-way. Some results of construction will be short term while others may be more permanent.
In general, the actual construction of the transmission line is limited to short term effects as discussed in this section.
Long term effects are generally associated with the continued operation of the facility and are addressed in Section 5.5.4.2 of this report.
Short term visual effects will include the presence and movement of men, materials, and equipment; felling of trees in constructing temporary access roads and clearing the right-of-way; erection of fences, gates, barriers, and signs; and general disruption due to noise and dust of equipment operation.
4.2-4
4.2.3.3 Special Features a)
Historic Resources Known impact on historical resources will be restricted to the two historical areas identified in Section 3.9.3.8.
On-site inspection of the Union Reformed and Lutheran Church in Wapwallopen, Historic Area No. 1, has established that the houses and other buildings surrounding the church will hide the power line structure and conductors from view as discussed in Section
[3.7.8.7] of the July, 1972 Report. Aerial photographs and on-site inspection of the Old North Branch Canal, Historic Area No. 2, has revealed that this canal has been in a state of disrepair and has been unused for many years (Section [3.2.8.7]
of the July, 1972 Report).
Archaeological Resources The Susquehanna-Stanton 500 kV line crosses no known'areas of archaeological significance.
- However, should any objects of possible archaeological importance be unearthed during construction activities, 'PS.L will notify the Pennsylvania State Archaeologist for an evaluation of the site and recommendations for mitigative procedures.
4.2A Mitigative Measures PPKL has an extensive set of guidelines to insure minimal impact to the environment in constructing and maintaining a transmission line. These specifications are included in Appendix A. They deal with all phases of construction and mainten'ance of a transmission line and the mitigative procedures commonly followed by the applicant.
Clearing, location, and construction of access roads, grading and maintenance of such roads, as well as the entire right-of-way, are also discussed in detail in Appendix A. The important problems of erosion and sediment control are also discussed in this section. In summary, Appendix A discusses all mitigative measures normally performed in the construction and maintenance of a transmission line.
4.2;5
PART IV N R C CHAPTER 5 ENVIRONMENTALEFFECTS OF PLANT OPERATION 5.5 EFFECTS OF OPERATION AND MAINTENANCEOF THE TRANSMISSION SYSTEM 5.5.1 Anticipated Electrical Radiation Effects Of The 500 kV Transmission Line 5.5.1.1 Ozone And Oxides OfNitrogen The maximum level of corona produced ozone near the edge of the right-of-way as estimated in Subsection 3.9.5.2 is expected to be less than 0.015 parts per million maximum 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> average above ambient. This value includes the cumulative effect due to the 230 kV circuits and the 500 kV circuit. For the conditions noted, the contribution of ozone from transmission lines decreases rapidly at increasing lateral or radial distances from the line.
Therefore, based on operating experience and review of the technical literatures of the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the levels of ozone from the transmission line are not expected to exceed the Environmental Protection Agency's Standards.
The estimated maximum level of corona produced oxides of nitrogen at the edge of the right-of-way is 0.0008 parts per million maximum 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> average above ambient (see Subsection 3.9.5.2)
~ Based on experience and review of the technical literatures of the IEEE and EPA, the anticipated levels of oxides of nitrogen from the transmission line are not expected to exceed the Environmental Protection Agency's Standards.
5.5. 1.2 Audible Noise During periods of fair weather, sporadic faint sounding discharges may be heard from point sources on the conductor. These point sources include: burrs, scratches,
- bugs, sand, etc. These infrequent discharges occur on most 500 kV lines and lines of higher voltages. It is the experience of PP&L that this typical operation of overhead lines has not been the cause of public complaints.
5.5-1
Under certain conditions when the energized conductor is wet (heavy fog, light rain, etc.) the maximum audible noise anticipated from the lines will be approximately 63 dBA at the edge of the right-of-way. This level exceeds that value of 58.5 dBA at which the Bonneville Power Administration study indicates numerous complaints can be expected.
However, the wet conductor condition is temporary and this level would diminish as soon as the conductors began to dry. In addition, the area traversed is very sparsely populated.
Therefore, the impact to the environment is expected to be minimal.
5.5. 1.3 Electromagnetic Influence a)
Radio Influence Radio influence for broadcast stations at 1000 kilohertz is estimated to be a maximum of 74 dB above 1 micro-volt per meter (dBu) at the edge of the right-of-way during foul weather conditions. This represents an average value for all rain rates.
During fair weather conditions this level will be approximately 52 dBu. Allowing for the 24 dB decibel signal to noise ratio specified by the FCC for good reception, all stations with a signal strength of 76 dBu or better should be received with good quality at the edge of the right-of-way.
As this level is somewhat high for fair weather conditions it is expected that fewer stations will be received with good quality, however strong local stations should not be affected. During foul weather conditions at the edge of the right-of-way, stations having signal strengths of less than 100 dBu would have their reception quality impaired.
The level of radio influence decreases with increasing distance laterally from the transmission line. At approximately 300 feet from the centerline of the 500 kV structures, under foul weather conditions the radio influence level decreases to about 52 dBu and would have minimal impact upon strong local stations.
At 300 feet during fair weather, stations with signal strength of 54 dBu or better should be received with good quality.
b)
Television Influence As noted in Subsection 3.9.5.4 television influence from 500 kV transmission lines is typically not a problem.
Based on the literatures of the IEEE and CIGRE (The International Conference on Large Electrical Systems) and on operating experience, no corona produced television interference problems are foreseen for those areas where good television reception is presently obtained.
5.5.1.4 Electromagnetic Induction The cumulative value of the electromagnetic field is a maximum of 0.9 Gauss at 10 feet above ground. This maximum level occurs for the three structure corridor with 3470 amps per phase flowing in the 500 kV circuit and 1640 amps per phase in each circuit of the 230 kV lines.
5.5-2
At this level of electromagnetic field intensity, and based on the. technical literatures of IEEE, CIGRE, and on experience, the electromagnetic field should pose no threats to the safety of man.
5.5.1.5 Electrostatic Induction The 500 kV overhead transmission line design gives a maximum electrostatic gradient of 7.8 kilovolts per meter within the right-of-way and a
maximum of approximately 1.7 kilovolts per meter at the edge of the right-of-way. When paralleled with 230 kV double circuit structures the edge of right-of-way value does not increase significantly. For large vehicles (see Subsection 3.9.5.5) and under favorable conditions the 5 milliampere electrostatic short circuit current criteria could be exceeded. These values are based upon a 37 foot minimum clearance.
Where the line crosses highways the minimum clearance will be increased to 47 feet. At other points along the transmission line the impact of the electrostatic field is expected to be minimal.
Maintenance Of Transmission System 552.1 Maintenance And Repair Activities Annual inspections of the line will be made by PP&L. This will be done with fixed wing aircraft or helicopter. The line will be inspected on foot on the order of every three to five years. The inspections are performed to determine if the line itself is in need of repair, or ifright-of-way reclearing is needed.
Should repairs be necessary, PP&L or its contractor will utilize access roads wherever possible.
In the event that is not feasible due to weather conditions or lack of
- access, a helicopter may be necessary to perform the necessary maintenance.
55.2.2, Maintenance Of Rights-Of-I%ay, And 5 5.2.3 Access Roads Subsequent to initial clearing, PP&L or its contractors will maintain a clear right-of-way and access roads, where needed, through the use of hand clearing and selective spraying of approved herbicides. The objective here is to eliminate tall growing tree species representing a danger to the line and promote the growth of low growing shrubs and forbs.
A detailed description of PP&L's maintenance procedures for rights-of-way and access roads is found in Appendix A. Included also in these detailed specifications is a list of small trees and shrubs which will be preserved along the right-of-way.
5.5.3 Operational Effects On Natural Systems I
55.3.1 Geology The operation of a transmission line will have no effect on the local geology.
5.6-3
5.5.3.2 Hydrology Misuse of herbicides could cause disruptions of the local hydrology. However, by following the manufacturer's directions and governmental regulations, hydrology will not be affected.
5.5.3.3 Soils Misuse of herbicides may result in soil sterilization. Should this occur, the right-of-way may become devoid of vegetation and erosion could result.
However, by following the manufacturer's directions and governmental regulations, soil sterilization will not result.
5.5.3.4 Terrestrial AndAquatic Communities The initial clearing and construction of the line would be expected to have greater impact on natural systems than maintenance procedures.
Hand clearing of vegetation will have minimal or no effect on terrestrial communities.
Any chemicals used to control vegetation will be approved by state and federal authorities and applied as directed by said authorities.
In no case will aerial application of herbicides be performed.
By applying herbicides manually, the possibility of them entering water courses is very remote. This, together with the careful construction and maintenance procedures used by PP&L, will minimize the effects on aquatic communities.
The line will not interfere with migrating birds'light paths. Other upland game birds may benefit from low growing vegetation along the right-of-way. Maintenance of the line will cause minimal disturbance to upland game birds due to the infrequent work which will be required. Electrical noise, ozone, and induced currents will have little or no effect on migratory or upland game birds, or plant life along the right-of-way.
5.5.4 Effects On Man-Made Systems 5.5.4.1 Land Use, And 5.5.4.2 Demography a)
Physical Effects The minimal amount of periodic maintenance activity along the right-of-way will have a negligible disruptive effect upon land use or demographic activities.
b)
Visual Effects The greatest adverse impact of the proposed transmission facilitywill involve the structures and conductors which will sometimes be visible from areas of public access.
Public access areas are defined as urban developments, major river crossings, recreational 5.54
lands, roadways, and population concentration points. The criteria to assess potential visual impact includes the following considerations and their application in the analysis of all segments:
is the proposed right-of-way corridor in a direct line-of-sight path as viewed from public access
- areas, and, if so, what is the projected visible effect of the change brought about by construction of a right-of-way and appurtenances?
The letter and arrow symbols in the following discussion are keyed to Figure 5.5-A and denote points where a field survey was utilized to identify potential visual impact zones.
The solid color arrows indicate possible near view impact zones and the outline arrows indicate potential distant view impact zones.
L1 is an area of near view visibility north of the station from which the transmission line will be visible from two light duty roads.
L2 is an area of near view visibility from a light duty road, and L3 is an area of near view visibilityfrom one light duty road and one medium duty road. L3A is an area in which the corridor is visible from a light duty road. L4 is an area of high visibilityfrom which the right-of-way will be visible from the Borough of Shickshinny, from all accessible ridgecrests, and from Pennsylvania Route 239 (LR 655) ~ L5 is an area of distant view visibilitywithin which the right-of-way will be visible from approximately 2.4 miles where a medium duty road parallels the proposed line.
L6 is a region in which the community of Hunlock will be exposed to near view visibility. In addition, there are three medium duty roads that intersect within 1/8 mile of the proposed route.
L7 is an area of distant view visibilityfrom a medium duty road which parallels the line for 1.2 miles and LB is an area visible from Pennsylvania Route 29 (LR 369). The proposed line will cross a medium and a light duty roadway at L9 and will be visible to travelers.
L'IO is an area visible from the village of Gregory and from a medium and a light duty roadway.
L11 is an area visible from a light duty road. L12 is an area visible from Pennsylvania Route 115 (LR 177) which is a four lane, heavy duty roadway.
L13 is an area of visibilityfrom a medium duty roadway and L14 is visible from a heavy duty roadway.
L15 and 16 are areas which are visible from each of two light duty roads.
L17 is visible from three light duty roadways. L18 is an area of visibilityfrom a light and a heavy duty road. L19 is a visible area from Pennsylvania Route 92 (LR 232).
Proposed measures to minimize potential visual impact include: structure design, structure location, and right-of-way development criteria as set forth in the Department of Interior/Department of Agriculture publication, "Environmental Criteria for Electric Transmission Systems,"
and the Federal Power Commission publication, "Electric Power Transmission and the Environment."
The proposed structure design will be a tubular, H-frame structure type of weathering
- steel, russet brown in color.
From both the above mentioned criteria publications and public opinion polls, a "tubular steel type" structure design is more aesthetically appealing to the general public than the standard "lattice type" structure (Pohlman, 1973).
In order to maintain a visually cohesive structure image throughout the proposed line, tubular steel structures will be used not only at visually sensitive zones, but along the entire line.
Potential for adverse visual impact may occur in those visually exposed portions of the facility in which the paralleling of existing structure types occur. This situation occurs east of Hunlock Station where the proposed "tubular steel type" structure parallels 5.5.5
approximately five miles of existing 230 kV steel lattice structures.
The potential for adverse impact is found not in the proposed structure but in its nonconforming visual context with the surrounding landscape image, which has already been traversed by "steel lattice" structures.
The degree of visual impact is equal to that degree of alteration realized in the character of image of an existing landscape.
The visual integration of tubular and lattice forms creates a contention for visual dominance, yielding visual discord, increased viewer awareness, and subsequent visual impact.
Structure location criteria in utilizing topography and vegetation for screening and absorption potential greatly minimize potential for visual exposure and subsequent impact. Of the 31 miles proposed, 30 percent is potentially visible to public access zones. Of this 30 percent visible, only 12 percent is near view.
, Right-of-way development practices for the proposed facility will allow for low-growing shrub species and ground cover providing a visually cohesive vegetative ground cover minimizing visual impact. Right-of-way development practices also include the reserve cutting and clearing of visually sensitive zones to minimize exposed views of the right-of-way.
5.5.5 References EHV Transmission Line Reference Book, Edison Electric Institute, New York, New York, 1968.
- Pohlman, Joseph C., What is the Public's Opinion on Transmission Towers and Poles?"
Electric Light and Power, T/D Edition, April, 1973.
5.5-6
PROPOSED 500 Icv TRANSMISSION LINE:
VISIBLE
~ HIDDEN NEAR VIEW 0
DISTANTVI EW 0
MILES f
t
(
~
a
/
S
'r r'r " t ll
~
t a
'la teaer e/
s qt a
ft ~ ~
I I'
NTON SES+
ae
.'LI5 I
fl
~
~ ~
~ e ee.a h
a h/
(.19 a
L12 et tgtr j
Lll
/;""c
~
a sstt ssss
~te h
/
t
/
ee r
h
.~;~p t
~
ae e
(
q'e p ~ji
,'a a
/h eh/
~ (t /
toa f
,e/
hl
~ "h te s i>>~..'
'NLOCK
/...
STATION lp.
et UG
/e
- '(et,'
~
I)
<o 0
/
Q t
as/
f (if+
8g// <$;
te
//
l
(
I I
I
, I e
et>>,
sett r
tee I
le I
I
/
/
el V
I I
trt o
e l
I
~ (let((
Q.
I ol I
a h aeOO
~ d, t>>t~
to/ /
eh
~coo>>s 1
~ ee
+ts((seat(
t he
~tttt It
~
sA t.r hh s s ea (
aa t S y
~
L3" I ss' S.. S.
EH>NN SES
~t,."
s s ~
sl j>i
(-,
>>o alee e
e ee
//
//
/
/
r
/
'f'hr~
/
~t
/
I Il
~
~
~a I
ye
/
t
">>.'4,
/
/
~ h~~
~
'a/,
y P'h
/
l
/
a et/Os lee e
e (
et r
/
fee
/
~ht C VISIBILITYANALYSIS I
FIGURE 5.5-A PENNSYLVANIAPOWER & LIGHTCOMPANY SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 APPLICANT'S ENVIRONMENTALREPORT AMENDMENT4 5.5-7
I l
PART V NRC CHAPTER 10 PLANT DESIGN ALTERNATIVES
'10.9 Transmission Facilities Alternate route considerations for the Susquehanna-Stanton 500 kV line were based on the analysis of alternatives for the original Susquehanna-Lackawanna 500 kV line.
These considerations are addressed in Section 3.9.4 of this report and discussed in detail in Section [8.6.1.1] of the Ju/Y, 1972 Report.
10.9.1
PART VI NRC CHAPTER 11
SUMMARY
BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS The Susquehanna-Lackawanna transmission line proposed in Section [3.2] of the
- July, 1972 Report, was selected on the basis of both environmental-impact and economic criteria. The major portion of this'eport discusses the environmental advantages associated with the shorter Susquehanna-Stanton Line. There are also substantial economic advantages associated with the shorter line as indicated in Table 11.0-A below. In addition to the economics of the shorter line length, Table 11.0-A lists cost savings realized by the use of poles in place of the originally proposed lattice towers.
In summary, the proposed Susquehanna-Stanton Line represents a substantial reduction in both environmental impact and in construction cost over the original Susquehanna Line. Yet there will be no reduction in the reliability of the PP& L transmission system associated with the shorter Susquehanna-Stanton 500 kV line.
11.0-1
Original Susquehanna-Lackawanna Alternate A Susquehanna-Stanton (a)
Alternate B Susquehanna-Stanton (b)
Length Right of Way Costs Construction Costs To~el Costs~1'4 miles 815,000
$24,500,000
$25,315,000 33 miles 625,000
$16,000,000
$16,625,000 33 miles 625,000
$17,200,000
$17,825,000 (1) 1979 Dollars a.
Poles Structures Selected b.
Towers Alternate Structures PENNSYLVANIAPOWER & LIGHTCOMPANY SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 APPLICANT'S ENVIRONMENTALREPORT AMENDMENT4 COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
, TABLE 11.0-A 11.0-2
EXHIBITA TRANSMISSION CONSTRUCTION SPEC IF ICATIONS DEVELOPMENT OF EROSION CONTROL PLAN FOR LINE CONSTRUCTION Pennsyivania Power 5 Light Company
PENNSYLVANIA POWER 5 LIGlF COhlPANY ENGINEERING DEPARTNENT SPECIFICATION FOR ACCESS ROAD CONSTRUCTION AND STRUCTURE SITE GRADING SCOPE This specification covers the location, construction
, maintenance and resto'ration of tho means of access either to or on the right of way and any other earthmoving activity for the construction of a transmission line.
During construction, copies of this Specification and Construction Plans shall be located in the field and shall be available i'or use by construction personnel and by state and federal agency porsonnel.
II.
INTENT The intent of the Specification is to describe the general provisions that sh'all be followed for the accomplishment of work within the scope of the Specification so as to cpntrol erosion and resulting sedimentation of waters and to comply with PA DER Erosion and Sedimentation Control Regu-lations.
This Specification shall be used in conjunction with the trans-mission line construction plan and profile sheets and shall be referred to thereon.
The Construction Department shall notify the Soil Conservation Service at the Conservation District of the county in which tho trans-mission line will be constructed in advance of any earth moving work I
being performed.
III.
GENERAL Increased transmission line impact and the amount of erosion are closely related.
The moro earth moving that is performed, the more visible the 13 Sheets, No.
2 of A-118231
transmission line becomes.
It follows that erosion is directly pro-
'ortional to the amount of root system and vegetation destroyed through
'rading operation and to the slope of disturbed surfaces.
Therefore, the selection of access road locations that require minimum grading, remove the least vegetation and ground cover, and reduce exposed slopes is of utmost importance.
The phase of construction during which erosion control measures shall be implemented are clearing of right of way, construction of access
- roads, preparation of structural site, material hauling to structure sites, r
excavation of foundations, preassembling and the erection of structures, final grading and wire stringing.
Special erosion control measures shall be implemented at. stream and spring crossings and at public and private
,road crossings.
IV.
VEGETATION t4WAGEMENT SPECIFICATION The following Vegetation h1anagement Specifications shall apply:
LA-79827 - Specification for initial cutting, removal,and trimming o(
vegetation on or adjacent to electric line right of way, LA-79828 - Specification for installing vegetation on or adjacent to electric line right of way. and for general landscaping.
Y.
ACCESS ROADS In general, access roads shall be located to preserve natural terrain and minimire erosion and sedimentation.
1%ere possible, road grades and 13 Sheets, No.,3 of A-118231
alignments shall follow the contour of the land with smooth, gradual
'I curves within the limits of the right of way unless special permission has been obtained to use the land outside of the right of way.
A.
Grading Hhere grading is necessary because of construction on hillsides,'eans shall be employed to prevent erosion in the transmission line right of way.
The degree and aspect of the slope, tho type and stability of the soil; and the permeability of undisturbed adjacent terrain are all factors. which will effect the methods of erosion control which will be used.
Ln general, drainage swales or ditches shall be constructed as road building progrosses and shall be located to follow the natural drainage patterns of the surrounding area.
Contours of adjacent terrain as well as right of way contours shall determine the location of swales.'here the transmission line follows downhill slopes exceeding Sw, construct drainage ditches along access roads for directing water runoff to interceptors, as shown on Sheets 10 6 11, Those interceptors shall be spaced in accordance with Sheet 13 to direct the flow of runoff water into existing stabilized areas.
Riprap consisting of local stono shall be placed at the outlet of interceptors to break the force of runoff, except where runoff wator can discharge immediately into rocky areas, heavy vegetative areas, or compacted brush pile.
13 Shoots, Ho.
4 of A-118231
1.
Public Road Crossin At public road crossings, the access road shall be located such as to.avoid whenever possible giving the public a long view of a transmission line.
As much natural growth for the road screen as possible shall be preserved by selecting a route angling through the'creen from the public road to the cleared right of way.
When a route has been selected and the access road is constructed, all vehicles shall utilize this entrance to the transmission line.
Any additional disturbance to the road screen shall be held to an absolute minimum.
Where the transmission line ground contour slopes downward towards the public road, construct drainage ditches or inter-ceptors at appropriate intervals along the access road to dir-ect water runoff across and off the access roads before reach-ing the public road; thereby allowing the water to dissipate into areas of vegetation and avoiding increased velocity of flow and acceleration of erosion on the roadway shoulder.
Soil disturbance shall be kept to a minimum and temporary restoration shall be made immediately following grading.
Slopes in earth cuts and fills and scarred areas at public road cross-ings shall be hydroseeded as.soon as practical with mix 8 (coarse lawn mix) for slopes less than 3 to 1 or crown vetch for slopes
'xceeding 3 to 1 per PPOL Co. Specification LA-79828, latest revision, to reduco erosion and restore appearance of vegetation cover.
At critical locations where high erosion potential
,exist and when time of yoar is not suitable for seeding, mulch 13 Sheets, No.
5 of A-118231
consisting of straw or wood chips shall be placed until the seeding operation can take place.
2.
Wooded Areas Where grades permit, locate the access road on the lower elevation of the right of way sidehill so it can be partially screened by the adjacent woodlands.
Generally, the access road shall be loc-ated to avoid existing low growing tree varieties on the'ight of way.
When it is necessary to route the access road through clumps of trees, a route shall be selected'whi.ch minimizes tho tree damage, Tree root damage caused by (1) excessive cuts into the roots, (2) disposal of fillon top of moot zones, which can suffocate the
- tree, and (3) bark damage through scraping of the tree trunk shall bo avoided wherever possible.
Soil compaction by construction equipment in thc tree root zone which can have the same effect as raising the grade shall be avoided, Besides cutting, filling, compacting and bark tearing, the disposal of oils, chemicals or other toxic materials shal'1 not be permitted.
>he access road shall have a minimum width which will permit the travol of construction equipment.
During the clearing oper-ation, soil disturbance shall be kept to a minimum, and rock out-crops and tree stumps shall remain in place.
Soft road bases should be stabilized with a suitable fillmaterial such as shale or crushed stone.
A minimum cover of 18 inches shall be retained over culvert pipes to ensure adequate protection.
The Engineer 13 Sheets, No.
6 of A-118231
shall bc consulted to specify stabilizing procedures in particularly difficult areas.
gvery effort shall be made to avoid erosion by constant surveillance I
of potential erosion areas and where necessary, the ruts shall be smoothed out and gravel shall be spread on roadway to prevent erosion.
Slopes in earth cuts and fills shall be seeded as pre-.
viously described under the Public Road Crossing item.
3.
Cultivated Area Generally, no special road construction is required over flat cultivated areas.
In cultivated areas, property owners shall be consulted on road location to minimize crop damage and soil dis-turbance.
Existing open field drainage ditches shall be maintained.
Tire ruts and deprossions which are created by vehicular traffic N
shall be corrected and the area maintained in suitable repair to prevent erosion acceleration.
Re'storative measures shall be taken not more than one week after the construction of a transmission line.
The disturbed areas shall be first dished to loosen the soil and then -seeded and mulched to reduce erosion and restore natural appearance.
Seeding in cultivated areas should be done only after consultation with the land owner.
4.
Stream and S rin Crossin s
Access road construction in the vicinity of stream beds or springs shall be avoided where possible.
If required, such activity shall 13 Sheets, No.
7 of A-118231
be performed in a,manner to minimize damage to 'the natural con-dition of the area.
All low growing tree varieties and ground cover shall be preserved...
Root systems of trees that are not cut shall not be disturbed, and grading shall bo kept to a minimum.
In general, stream fords shall be used whore vehicle crossings are required.
Nhero necessaxy, the stream bottom shall be made firm by depositing native, stone when.practical in crossing area.
In areas where equipment must repeatedly cross stxoams or springs, or where the depth of the stream does not permit fording, culverts of size and number to adequately carry flow may be constructed.
Installation of culverts shall be coordinated with local.con-servation authorities".
Nhere streams are not crossed by access roads, vehicular txaffic shall be restricted from.the immediate area of the stream banks ;
to avoid disturbing these usually fragile areas.'
Soil disturbed areas shall be seeded as soon as practical.
1%ere steep slopes make it difficult to establish a vegetative cover, other restorative procedures, such as the use of gravel or rock shall be utilized.
Local conservation authorities should be consulted before rock stabilization methods are used.
Disposal of oils, lutants shall not chemicals and other types of soil or water pol-be permitted, Ground water pumped from structural excavations shall be deposited in removable containers or settling
. or leeching wells or shall be spray irrigated.
13 Sheets, No.
8 of A-118231
VI.
STRUCTURE S ITES Grading at the tower site shall be kept to the minimum sufficient for turn-around and for the assembling and erecting of tower steel.
Topsoil removed during excavation shall be stockpiled with precaution taken to prevent erosion, preferably at a high location, and redistributed after tower erection, On side hill construction, diversion terraces shall be constructed on the high side of the structure site so run-off water will be directed to un-disturbed terrain with. adequate ground cover.
Where water runoff from structure sites carry excessive
- sediment, a sedi-ment basin shall be constructed on the low side of the site.
After the topsoil is redistributed, the area shall be promptly hydroseeded, Structure site and access road grading shall be so performed that original grades will be retained at each pole or foundation location.
F.
G.
Knauss:WAS 0862 13 Sheets, No.
9 of A-118231
CUT KIER 1.
INTERCEPTORS SPACED AT INTERVALS AS SHOWN ON'TREET NO.
13 UJ 0
CO 2,.
S (M
M G
5.
U EO,CUT C FILL AREAS LCH ONLY AS TEMPORARY ASURE DURING NON.
OWIHG SEASON)
E TOP SOIL SCRAPED OM TOWER SITE TO STALL DIVERSION RRACE AND SKEb AFTER TOP50IL IS RE DlSTYLI SUTFb.
/
I ACCESS ROAD SEE I
SECTION 8-B ON SHEET ~0 IHTERCEPTOR SEE SECTION AA ON SHEET ~0
/ACCESS ROAD f TOWER Fl)L TEMPORARY DIVERSION ERRACE APPROX EVEL AREA FOR LAY-DOWH AND ERECTIOl4 EOUIPMEHT TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN OUTLET INTO EXIST-
'NG STABILIZED AREA j 'i ACCESS ROAD AHD TOWER SITE GRADIHG TYPICAL PLAH FOR LIHE"DOWN SLOPE 13 SHEETS'O.
10 OF A-118231-o
~ 0 0
o 4 ACCESS ROAD SEE.SECTION B-B OH SHEET HO.
12 TE
'E PORARY IMEHT IN E lEWINAOE 00' SiOpg
~NO 1.
INTERCEPTORS SPACED AT INTERVAI.S AS SHOWN OH SHEET NO.
13 P.
SEED, CUT AE FILL AREAS (MULCH ONLY AS TEMPORARY MEASURE DURING NON -GROWIHG.
SEASON.)
8.
USE TOP SOIL SCRAPED FROM TOWER SITE TO INSTALL DIVERSION TERRACE AND SEED AFTER TOPSOll,lS REDISTRIBUTED TEM DIV TER ORARY RSIOH ACE CD EE I
~ll CD CE LEO I
I I
~l I
APP X
LEV AREA FOR LAYDOWH AHD ERECTIO TOWER EEOC ACCESS ROAD AND TOWER SITE GRADING TYPICAL PLAH FOR LINE ACROSS SLOPE 13 SHEETS, HD.
11 OF A-118231-0
DOWN SLOPE
~ HITCH FLOW'CCESS ROAD OOHH ORROE r
cP IHTERCEPTOR SPACIHG FILL CC RD O
HR CD O
OUTLET INTO EXISTING~
STABILIZED AREA RIPRAP WHEN REQUIRED 2'IN.
ROAD GRADE XEK INTERCEPTORS SPACED AT INTERVALS AS SHOWN OH SHEET HO.
13.
4:I MAX.
SECTION A -
A 2.
SEED,CUT L FILL AREAS (MULCH ONLY AS TEMPORARY MEASURE DURING HON-GROWING IH HIH.
2:1 HD RD CC SECTION B
EXISTIHG CROSS GRADE r
Ig
'I MIN BhTH 1:I MIN, SHALE 12
MIH.
ACCESS ROAD TYPICAL ROAD AND INTERCEPTOR DETAILS 13
- SHEETS, HO.
12 OF A -11823 I-o
40 35 30 25 20 CD 15 10 CD CD CV CD INTERCEPTOR SPACING IN FEET ALONG C RO/0 FOR VERTICAL INTERVAL OF 15'XAMPLE:
GRADE AS SHOWN ON PROFILE OR AS DETERMINED IN FIELD IS 151m 1.
ENTER CHART AT 15%
2.
MOVE RIGHT TO INTERCEPT CURVE 3 ~
MOVE DOWN TO FINO SPACING ACCESS ROAD INTERCEPTOR SPACING 13 SHEETS, ND. 13 OF A-118231-o
EXHIBITB VEGETATION MANAGEMENT SPECIFICATIONS FOR INITIALCUTTING, REMOVAL,AND TRIMMINGOF VEGETATION ON OR ADJACENT TO ELECTRIC LINE RIGHT-OF-WAY Pennsylvania Power 5 Light Company
INDEX I.
SCOPE II.
INTENT III.
DEFINITIONS IV, EXTENT OF WORK TO BE PERFORMED BY CONTRACTOR V.
RES PONSIBILITIES OF CONTRACTOR A.
General B.
Repair of Existing Fences C.
Access to Line Right of Way D.
Stream Crossings and Erosion Control E.
Method of Clearing 10 10 1.
General 2.
Types of Clearing a.
Tailored Clearing b.
Selective Clearing F.
Disposal of Cleared Vegetation 1.
Timber 2.
Slash 10ll 11 12 13 13 13 a.
Compaction b.
Chipping c.
Burning G,
Chemical Control of Vegetation H.
Preservation of Existing Ground Cover and Ground Contours I.
Removal of Danger Trees 7.
Special Clearing Restrictions 13 l4 14 15 17 17 17 26 Sheets, No. 2 of IA-79827-2
INDEX Continued EXHIBITS 1.
Minimum Conductor Ciearances for,66 & 138 kv Lines UtQiztng Single Wood or Steel Pole Structures 2,
Minumum Conductor Clearances for 66 & 138 kv Lines Utilizing Towers and/or Multiple Wood or Steel Pole Structures 3.
Minimum Conductor Clearance for 230 kv Lines (AQ Types) 4.
Minimum Conductor Clearance for 500 kv Lines (AllTypes) 5.
List of Plants Which Shall be Preserved Where They Occur on Electric Line Right of Way 6.
Typical Notations to be Shown on Clearing Plan of Line by Company 7.
Barbed Wire Gate for Closing Openings Made in Existing Fences
~Pa e
19 20 21 22 23 25 26 26 Sheets, No, 3 of LA-79827-2
SPECIFICATIONS FOR INITIALCUTTING, REMOVALAND TRIMMING OF VEGETATION ON OR AD AGENT TO ELECTRIC LINE RIGHT OF WAY I. SCOPE This Specification covers the initial selective removal or trimming of trees and brush and selective spraying of growth on or adjacent to electric lines of all voltages located on private or public right of way.
- 11. INTENT The intent of this Specification is to:
A. Specify the responsibilities of Contractors and describe the general procedures that shaH be followed by Contractors in accomplishing all work within the scope of these Specifications.
B. Define the minimum clearance between conductors and Mees acceptable to Company in providing satisfactory electric service to its customers.
C. Provide a type of clearing that will (1) improve the visual impact of right of way clearing on the public view to the greatest practical extent and (2) retain, where possible, desirable species of vegetation on or adjacent to electric line right of way to prevent ground erosion, reduce the requirements for screen plantings at road crossings and minimize future control maintenance.
III. DEFINITIONS A. Company - Pennsylvania Power & Light Company or its authorized representative.
B. Company Representative - An authorized representative of Pennsylvania Power and Light Company acting as liaison between the Company and Contractor in connection with all clearing activity.
He willfollow and review, and, in the case of cost-plus work, direct as required, Contractor's clearing operations in the field to assure that the intent of this Specification is carried out.
C. Contractor - Right of way clearing contractor.
D. Clearing Plan - Plan of line showing location and type of clearing to be performed by Contractor.
E VYOoded Area - Areas covered by trees that have grown, or are of a species that can crow to"e 'enificTent hei'tht to tnTerlere with the operathht reltahi11ty oi the elecb ic fine.
F.'Initial Clearing - Applies to line right of way being cleared for the first time.
26 Sheets, No.
4 of IA-79827-2
G. Widening - Applies to increasing the cleared width of right of way along an existing electric line.
H. Selective Clearing - Removal of all forest type species, except where noted on Clearing Plan, and retention and preservation of low growing varieties such as listed in Exhibit 5.
See Section V, E-2-b.
I. Tailored Clearing - Topping and trimming of trees to obtain specified clearances to conductors, including removal of indiv'dual trees.
See Section V, E-2-a.
J. Tree Removal - Felling of trees, including removal of branches, and disposal of timber and slash.
K. Tree Trimming - Cutting tree branches to provide designated clearances to a line conductor, including disposal of the slash.
L. Danger Trees - Trees outside the initiallycleared right of way that, in falling, would either, strike the conductor or pass within minimum clearances noted in Exhibits 1 through 4 of this Specification.
Danger Trees willbe marked for topping or removal by Company Representa-tive, who shall consider the following factors in making this decision:
1.
Directional lean of tree.
2.
Conformation of tree.
3.
Species (wood structure and root system structure).
4.
Age and vigor of tree.
5.
Terrain.
6.
Soil structure.
7.
Potential hazard.
M. Timber - Merchantable tree trunks and branches four inches or larger in diameter.
N. Slash - Cut tree trunks and branches smaller than four inches in diameter, also undesirable brush requiring removal.
O. Compaction - Method of stacking and compacting slash as described in Section V, F-2-a.
P. Spraying - Chemical treatment of stumps, exposed roots and undesirable woody growth to prevent recurring growth.
Q. Improved Road - Any public road surfaced with concrete,
- macadam, crushed
- stone, etc.
On land under the jurisdiction of the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources or Pennsylvania Game Commission, all roads open to public travel shall be considered improved in respect to the type of clearing required by these specifications, except as otherwise determined by the Department or Commission.
26 Sheets, No.
5 of LA-79827-2
IV. EXTENT OF WORK TO BE PERFORMED BY CONTRACTOR A. Work shall include clearing the right of way to the widths and clearance noted in Tables I and II of this Specification for the voltage and type of line involved..
Work shall be done in accordance with the specifications for the type of clearing noted on prints of Clearing Plan of line furnished by Company to each prospective bidder and as further detailed in this Specification.
'These prints shall become part of the clearing contract - and as herein specified.
B. Lin Clearing Plans generally w01 be prepared for higher voltage lines 56 kv and above}.
In addition to showing clearing instructions, Clearing Plans also will be marked to show names of property owners.
When no Clearing Plan is available, generally for lines less than 66 kv voltage,.
typo and location of each type of initial clearing shall be as noted in th<
request for bids for this work and as further detailed in this Specification.
C. Company will provide successful bidder, in writing, a list of right of way grants for a new line, or where cleared right of way of an existing line is being widened.
TMs list will show names of property owners and clearing rights secured, including restrictions.
D. Contractor shall confine his activities within the limits provided by the right of way grants, except for danger trees.
This shall include the storage of equipment and materials and the exercise of proper care to avoid damage and litter outside these areas.
Allrestrictions in the right of way grants shall be strictly adhered to by Contractor.
E. Where the electric line is adjacent to property lines, danger trees may be on adjoining properties.
Permission for trimming or removing these trees will be obtained by Company from the property owners involved.
All trees so designated wi)l be marked by Company prior to Contractor undertaking this work.
F. Prior to start of clearing operations, the Company willstake the center line of the electric line.
The center hub of each line structure also will be staked by Company, when possible.
Contractor shall take precautions to preserve all survey stakes and hubs, and those destroyed in the clearing operation willbe replaced at the expense of the Contractor.
26 Sheets, No.
6 of IA-79827-2
Table I MINIMUMTOTALWIDTHS WITHINWHICH CLEARING IS TO BE PERFORMED IN WOODED AREAS UNLESS OTHERWISE DESIGNATED IN CONTRACT Voltage and Type of Construction Width Aerial Cable on Messenger (all voltages)
Plastic Covered Conductor (above 600 v. to 12 kv.)
Cut limbs and branches less than 4" diam. to clear cable by 30" min.
(Por tree trunks and larger branches, no clearance is required.)
10 ft - Bracket Construction 20 ft - Crossarm Construction 23 Kv Lines and Under Bare Conductors Wood Pole or Tower Single Phase Three Phase 30 ft 50 ft 66 & 138 Kv Lines Single steel or wood pole Two or more pole structure Steel Tower 70 ft (See Exhibit 1, Sht.
19) 100 ft (See Exhibit 2, Sht. 420) 100 ft (See Exhibit 2, Sht. 420) 230 Kv Lines Steel pole Steel tower 100 ft (See Exhibit 3, Sht. 421) 100 ft (See Exhibit 3, Sht. 421) 500 Kv Lines Steel tower 200 ft (See Exhibit 4, Sht. 422)
- 26Sheets, No. 7of IA-79827-2 I
Table II MINIMUMCLEARANCES TO BE OBTAINED BY TRIMMINGFOR LINES LOCATED ALONG OR WITHIN HIGHWAYS AND STREETS Volta e of Line Minimum Clearance to Conductor (Horizontal and Vertical) 23 kv and under 66 kv to 230 kv 500 kv 5 ft IS ft 20 ft V, RESPONSIBILITIES OF CONTRACTOR A. General
- 1. Contractor shall provide all necessary labor and equipment for execution of the work.
- 2. Prior to the start of clearing operations, property owners will be notified by the Company when clearing operations are expected to begin.
Whenever possible, Contractor also shall contact the property owner, or his representative, prior to start of clearing operations.
Contractor shall not begin his operations until he is notified to proceed
. by the Company, Copies of ail out peimits reqZred by regulatory agencies willbe furnished to the Coritractor Gy'the Company and shall be kept at tlm site of activity when clearing operations are undertaken.
- 3. No tree or brush work shall be performed within the confines of State Highway limits unless a permit has been obtained by Company from the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation and is in possession of Contractor at site of work.
- 4. Contractor shall conduct all operations in such a manner that all roads will be kept open to traffic.
S. Contractor shall clean up all slash and rubbish resulting from his work as work progresses, leaving the area in a condi~don satisfactory to Company's representative.'.
Re ir of Existin Fences Contractor shall be responsible for immediat ly repairing or replacing all fences or gates damaged by his forces at his own expense.
'Ihe continuity of electric fences shall be maintained.
Adequate care shall be taken to assure that gates are not left open or fences left in such condition that the property owner's livestock can escape.
If existing 26 Sheets, No.
8 of LA-79827-?
fences or gates along a right of way are in a state of disrepair prior to start of clearing and could allow livestock to escape, this shall be called to the attention of the Company Representative in order that the property owner may be notified.
- 2. Where existing usable fences are attached to trunks of trees to be felled, these trees shall be cut at a point six inches above the top wire strand, unless otherwise directed by the Company's Representative.
- 3. Where movement of Contractor's equipment is required through existing
- fences, a "Texas" style gate per attached Exhibit 7, shall be made by the Contractor.
Any required addition of fence-wire, brace posts, gate posts or other associated fence mater1al - shall be of new quality and of similar design as existing fence material.
C.Access to Line M ht of Wa
- l. Access to the line right of way shall be 11mited, where possible, to public road crossings.
Additional access off the limits of line easements shall be negotiated by the Company, when deemed necessary by Company representative.
When line access 1s desired from property owners other than those from whom easements already have been obtained by the Company, Contractor shall notify Company Representative.
Upon Company Representative's concurrence on the necessity of this additional access, Company willnegotiate with these property owners for this privilege.
Contractor shall bear the cost of any damage he may cause to these access routes and obtain written release for damage from property owners.
- 2. Existing roads, culverts or bridges - either. private or public - that form a portion of Contractor's means of access to the right of way shall be reviewed with the Company Representative prior to use.
The Contractor shall take whatever steps the Company Representative deems necessary to insure that these facilities are restored to at least as good condit1on after the Contractor's use as they were originally. At the request of the Company Representative, the Contractor shall immediately repair damaged roads or bridges that would hinder or prevent the owner's or tenant's use.
- 3. Where new roads or other means of access such as bridges, etc., are required to enter or traverse the right of way for construction or maintenance of the line, clearing for these facilities shaQ be performed by the
'ontractor by direction of the Company Representative.
- 4. In general, vehicle traffic shall be restricted to a single lane roadway of
~
15'-0" width along and into the right of way, Where the access road leaves an improved highway into the right of way, it shall be located so as to enter the right of way from either edge and at an angle to the highway to avoid observation down the center of right of way from the highway.
26 Sheets, No. 9 of LA-79827-2
For access to right of way on hillsides, access road shall be located on uphill side of right of way, where possible, to prevent erosion.
Contractor shall use only one access strip as designated by Company Representative.
D. Stream Crossin s and Erosion Control
- 1. Contractor shall keep his equipment out of streams or other bodies of water. Ifit is necessary to cross a stream, Contractor shall construct a temporary bridge adequate for his requirements so as to avoid siltation of the waterway or erosion to its banks that could cause future siltation.
Contractor shall comply with all pertinent provisions of Chapter 102 grosion Control) adopted September 21, l1972, to form part of the Pennsylvania Clean Streams Law of June B2, 1937, P.L. 1987.
I
- 2. Where swampy areas are traversed by line route, a rip-rap surfacing of vegetation shall be installed by Contractor to protect the ground contours prior to crossing these locations with any equipment.
Locations where these protective measures shall be utilized willbe noted on the Clearing Plan of line or per instructions issued at time quotations are requested for work.
Rip-rap shall be laid on the ground surface and corstructed of an undermat of brush, limbs and tree stems laid perpendicular to the line center line in an 18 to 20 foot wide swath.
Poles 18 to 20 feel long,cut from adjacent timber, shall then be laid closely together on top of this undermat.
Cover poles should extend transversely from one edge of the base swath to the other, forming a corduroy roadway.
E. Method of Clearin
- 1. General a.
Contractor shall cut and remove all specified trees, tree stubs and brush on the right. of way within the widths noted in Table I, and as detailed in this Specification for the type of clearing to be performed.
All stump heights shall be a maximum of three inches above normal ground level, with no sharp points or splinters left standing.
Stumps shall be cut parallel with the ground.
b.
Contractor shall cut and dispose of all slash, logs and tree stubs in previously cut-over areas.
All tree stubs of a height greater than three inches above normal grade in these areas shall be recut and disposed of unless otherwise specified.
2 6 Sheets, No. 10of LA-79827"2
c.
On the edges and banks of streams and other natural water courses, clearing shall be done in a manner that willnot disturb the root structure of the existing growth or increase the hazard of erosion.
At stream or river crossings, Contractor shall satisfactorily restore the original ground contours of any disturbed bank areas to prevent erosion.
Logs from trees cut along streams and swamps shall be removed beyond any possible flood areas.
'lhe type of clearing to be performed by Contractor on various parts of a line, or for the entire line, will be marked on the Clearing Plan of line furnished by the Company or specifically noted in the requests for quotations for this work.
Two types of clearing may be involved:
Tailored or Selective.
a.
Tailored Clearin Tailored clearing shall be performed at locations noted on the Clearing Plan of line furnished by Company or as specifically noted in requests for bids.
Tailored clearing will be specified to obtain minimum clearances between line conductors and vegetation on or adjacent to the right of way as follows:
(I) At improved road crossings as specified on Clearing Plan or as designated by Company Representative.
(2)
In park and preserved natural areas.
(3)
Along highways and city streets.
(4)
At peaks, ridges and edge of wooded areas visible to the general public.
'5)
At stream and river crossings visible to the general public or for erosion control.
(6)
At any designated location along the route of a line where the Company deems it necessary to keep the removal of vegetation on or adjacent to the right of way to a minimum, consistent with reliable line operation.
Where this type of clearing is to be performed, the center hub of each tower line structure willbe staked by the Company in advance of all clearing activity at that location.
All existing vegetation within the right of way limits, shall be preserved to the greatest 26 Sheets, No. llof IA-79827-2
extent possible, except where its removal is required for erection of line structures or installation of conductors.
In all cases, conductor clearances at least equal to or greater than those noted in Exhibits 1 to 4 of this Specification shall be obtained by trimming or topping.
Where the amount of trimming or topping required is such as to endanger the normal life of a tree, or destroy <ts natural symmetry when located in parks, at road crossings, along improved roads or other locations where high public visibilityis involved, the tree shall be removed.
All trimming, topping or tree removal shall be done in such manner as to develop an irregular, softened effect that blends the right of way clearing into the surrounding undisturbed vegetation without sharply defined breaks or patterns.
Clearing of this type shall be performed under the direction of a Company Representative who also willdetetmine any additional clearing or trimming required at these locations for access roads, erection of line structures and installation of conductors.
b.
Selective Clearin Selective clearing shall be performed at locations noted on the Clearing Plan of line furnished by Company or as specifically noted in the request for quotations.
Where this type of clearing is to be performed, clearing shall include the removal of all trees other than low growing varieties noted in Exhibit 5 of this Specification.
Initial clearing shall be confined within thevarious widths noted in Exhibits 1 to 4 of this Specification, for the specific type and voltage of line to be installed.
%ee removal along the edges of the initial clearing width should be irregular to avoid a precise, mechanical effect.
Existing shrubs, herbs and grasses shall be preserved to the greatest extent practical during the clearing process.
Where structure locations are established prior to clearing, all brush shall be removed in their vicinity, as noted in the applicable Exhibit.
Where structure locations have not been determined at time of clearing, these areas shall be cleared of brush by the Clearing Contractor after structure center hubs have been established by Company.
Where the maximum sag of the low conductors is well above the tree growth in gullies or ravines, no removal of forest type trees in these areas will be necessary, except as may be required for line access or wire stringing.
Specific instructions as to the 26 Sheets, No.
12 of IA-79827-2
extent of clearing at these locations willbe noted on the Clearing Plan of line, when furnished by the Company, or as noted in the requests for quotations when no Clearing Plan is available.
Following installation of line conductors, Company's Representative willdesignate all danger trees that require removal.
Selection of trees for removal at this time also may include some growth along the previously cleared edges of right of way to further dev'clop a random, irregular pattern where the degree, of public visibility involved warrants this additional work.
These trees willbe designated by Company's Representative.
F. Dis sal of Cleared Ve etation
- l. The following shall be the method of disposal for merchantable timber.
a.
All merchantable timber four inches or larger in diameter shall be placed in neat piles parallel along the edge of the right of way.
Timber shall be stacked tree length unless otherwise specified.
Stacks or piles of Umber shall not be greater in length than the longest tree length.
A separation of at least ien feet shall be provided between individual piles.
Location of the various timber piles shall be chosen so that they willbe concealed to the greatest practical extent by existing vegetation selectively retained on the right of way to soften its appearance.
Allroads, trails or streams
'including their banks) shall be kept open and no stacking shall be undertaken within a road screen oo;viithin 100. feet."of a road."
- 2. The following shall be the methods of disposal for non-merchantable timber, tree tops, limbs and slash.
Method to be utilized willbe specified either on the Clearing Plan, by instructions furnished at time quotations are requested, or as noted on the property owner's Restriction List.
a.
C~om ation Slash and other cut material requiring disposal shall be stacked in flattened mounds to a height less than eye level.
Compaction of piles may be facilitated by use of equipment employed in the associated clearing operations.
Piles shall be dressed of'protruding limbs and located with the rear edge of piles at the edge of the line right of way.
Piles shall be keg'cTear 'of tower and pole site's."
The length of a pile of compacted slash should not be any greater than a tree length Umber pile and its width limited so as not to interfere with access road construction or wire stringing.
A separation of at least ten'feet shall be provided between adjoining piles of Umber or slash.
26 Sheets, No. 13of IA-79827-2
No stacking shall be undertaken within a road screen, within 100 feet of a road or at other locations involving high public visibility.
b.
C~hi >~inq Chipping will be specified when compaction or burning of slash is not acceptable.
Locations where chipping Is to be performed willbe as previously noted or may be requested during the actual clearing operations in the case of right of way acquired after clearing has commenced at other locations on the route oi'ine.
Chips shall be randomly scattered on the right of way but shall not be deposited in fields, along city streets, park areas, or on the banks of streams or ponds, These areas willeither be noted on the line Clearing Plan, Restriction List or verbally by the Company Representative.
At these locations, disposal of chips off the job site shall be the responsibility of the Contractor.
c.
~Bnrnin Burning of slash shall be performed only upon Company authorization and in compliance with the Regulations to Control Area (Air-Basin) Air Pollution of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Health, Air Pollution Commission - also any local or municipal ordinances.
Contractor shall comply with the following measures in connection with any burning activity:
l.
Contractor shall notify the local fire department, District Office of the Department of Environmental Resources and Company Representative prior to conducting a burning operation on a dally basis.
2.
Burning shall be kept to small piles located clear of vegetation to be retained on right of way, as well as standing timber adjacent to edge of right of way.
A tractor-width area around perimeter of slash pile shall be raked free of combustible material prior to burning.
3.
Burning shall be undertaken only when safe burning conditions exist - as determined by Company Representative in conjunction with a representative of the District Office of the Department of Environmental Resources.
4.
The use of rubber tires for starting fires is prohibited.
26 Sheets, No. 14 of IA-79827-2
5.
When a fire is reduced to charcoal and ash, it shall be raked and opened to prevent hot embers remaining in the ash piles.
'This precaution is contingent upon safe burning condiUons prevailing at the same time.
6.
Adequate fire-fighting equipment shall be kept at the site of any burning activity, including Indian Fire Tanks and Rich Fire Rakes (or equivalent), and a qujjgtjy..af water sufficient to extinguish any outbreaks.
7.
If burning conditions deteriorate, burning operations shall cease.
Mechanized fire fighting equipment (motor driven high pressure pump and tank units) shall be provided and utilized by Contractor until areas being burned are determined safe by Company Representative.
8.
Continuous patrolling shall be provided by the Contractor (day and night) as long as fire danger is high and hot embers exist in any of the burn piles.
Burying of hot embers also willbe an acceptable method of reducing the chance of a Qre outbreak but willnot eliminate the necessity of providing the above-noted protective measures.
9.
Any fire which burns beyond the right of way limits shall be promptly reported to the nearest Company Operating Headquarters or to the Company Representative.
Ifthere is any danger of a fire spreading beyond the control of the Contractor, the District office of the Department of Environmental Resources shall be notified for additional help to regain control of the situation.
10.
Contractor shall be responsible for any damage or in)ury resu)ting from a burning operation.
G. Chemical Control of Ve etation
- l. All chemical treatment for control of vegetation on electtic line right of way shall be done selecUvely.
No broadcast spraying will be permitted.
Chemical treatment of sturqs shall be as follows:
a.
Contractor shall spray with a chemical solution all cut stumps one inch and larger (except evergreens) as soon after cutting as possible.
The enUre stump shall be completely saturated, Including all exposed bark and roots.
Spraying to the point of run-off is imperative.
'Ihe chemical solution shall consist of 4 gallons of 2,4,5T (4 lbs. acid equivalent per gallon of concentrate) to 96 gallons of 42 fuel oil.
A substitute for this solution may be used with written permission from the Company.
- 26Sheets, No. 15 of IA-79827-2
b.
Chemical solution shall be applied by means of pressure tank spray equipment or by other procedures which will provide the thorough wetting and 1mpregnation requirements necessary for a stump killof at least 75%.
Final stump kill shall be determined at the time of the next growing season.
If percentage of stump k111 does not meet the specified requirements, Contractor shall res pray at his own expense until the specified percentage is reached.
Stumps sprayed 30 minutes or less prior to rain shall be sprayed again but not unt11 30 minutes after run-off has stopped.
c.
Under no condition shall the Contractor use a chemical weed or vegetation killer on the right of way on lands under the Jurisdiction of the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources or Pennsylvania Game Commissior., on a designated water shed property or in the vicinityof springs or drainage ditches except upon written approval hy the respective Department, Commission or owners.
d.
Chemical spray solution may be applied under any seasonable cond1tions except when snow, 1ce or water prevents intimate contact of the solution with the bark of the stump down to the ground line.
e.
Adequate care shall be exercised in spraying near growing crops or near shrubs and trees which are to be preserved.
Contractor shall take all necessary precautions to prevent fires during the course of spraying operations.'.
In clearing along edges and on banks of springs, creeks and other natural water courses where steep slopes make such banks susceptible to erosion, chemical treatment shall be completely omitted on stumps located on the banks and within 50 ft beyond the tops of banks.
This provision shall not apply to swales and other shallow depressions where erosion is prevented by heavy existing sod, briars, vines or similar ground cover.
Contractor shall take adequate precautions to prevent contamination of all water courses.
- 2. Chemical Growth Inhibitors a.
The use of chemical growth,inhibitors on vegetation on or adJacent to electric line right of way shall be undertaken only when specified by Company.
b.
Type of inhibitor, method, location and extent of application shall be in accordance with detailed instructions furnished by Company at time bids for this work are requested.
- 268heets, No. 16of IA-79827-2
- 3. Treatment of Cut Surfaces After trimming or topping ornamental or street trees, or as required by local or State regulation, Contractor shall paint all cut surfaces one inch or more in diameter with an approved tree wound dressing.
H. Preservation of Existin Ground Cover and Ground Contours
- 1. Contractor shall take adequate precautions not to remove or damage existing vegetation designated for preservation either as herein noted or as marked by Company Re'presentaQve.
- 2. Wheeled or tracked equipment shall be equipped with brushrakes,
- forks, winches or equivalent to move timber and slash into position for stacking, compaction, burning or removal.
In order to minimize removal of or damage to low growing varieties and ground cover, the use of bulldozer blades to handle timber or slash willnot be permitted.
- 3. Contractor shall regrade deep cuts, ruts, stump holes or mounded areas caused by clearing operations when, in the opinion of the Company's Representative, they could cause future ground erosion or interfere with access for line construction or maintenance.
- 4. The Contractor shall exercise special care at locations with ornamental, fruit and/or nut trees also cultivated grape, berry vines or bushes which are not to be removed or sprayed.
Ornamental, fruit or 'nut trees shall be trimmed or removed only by direction of the Company Representative and when prior written permission has been secured from the property owner ~
I. Removal of Dan er Trees
- 1. Contractor shall trim, top or cut and remove all danger trees.
Danger trees shall be specified by Company Representative in accordance with this Specification and normally willbe marked, trimmed or removed after installation of line conductors.
- 2. Danger trees shall not be removed for 23 kv and lower voltage lines.
However, all dead trees, or live trees with soil dug or washed from their roots in such manner as to reduce their stability, shall be removed
'here there is a probablity of falling into 23 kv and lower voltage lines.
J.
S cial Clearin Restrictions
- l. 'Ihe natural symmetry and beauty of trees which are trimmed or topped shall be considered and maintained to the greatest extent possible.
No stubs shall be left.
26 Sheets, No. 17 of IA-,79827-2
- 2. Existing trees within an area specified for tailored'clearing shall not be removed except as specifically marked by the Company Representative.
When it is necessary to remove these trees to provide adequate conductor clearance, special care shall be taken in their felling and removal so as not to damage vegetation that is to remain.
Any broken or damaged limbs shall be neatly pruned or removed.
'Ihese provisions shall apply at all line crossings over improved roads, along city streets and highways, and through park areas, regardless of the type clearing specified for the total line.
- 3. Clearing in watershed areas shall be kept to a minimum to minimize run-off of muddy water and soil erosion.
Watershed areas willbe identified by the Company as to their location and extent on the prints of the plan of line furnished with request for quotations for this work.
- 4. As a final comment, it is recognized that the type of vegetation prevailing in some parts of the Company's service area is such that little or no forest understory or brush exists for possible preservation in these wooded areas.
Even though Tailored clearing is specified, including locations at road crossings, the necessary removal of forest type trees in these areas to provide adequate conductor clearance cannot avoid creating a more or less pronounced break in, the pattern of forest cover.
'Ihe intent of this Specification is to soften the appearance of this break as much as possible by developing a natural appearing, rounded kind of clearing edge and the retention of existing low ground cover.
The selection of a specific type of clearing will be determined by the Company in advance of all clearing operations in relation to the degree and kind of public exposure involved with the location of the line.
APPROVED (including all Exhibits attached hereto)
H. W. Wri ht s
Manager, Engineering E
S idl s
Manager, Distribution R. C. Zundel s
- Manager, Real Estate N. W. Curtis s
Manager, Construction Director, Environmental Development By: Q. H. Smith-6/1/70 Revision 42-Approved 5/15/'I
'I 26 Sheets, No. 18 of IA-79827-2
g~. Cnndr br Seq
% ppsf Othe[ - barf t'a+ any loc.at'ton tn 8 pan) lcavgnce Ltnc r panycr Trees PIIncaston "4 t+ 6+
~m
~ Final st oW uc,foyg ghbwg on Linc Pv+Ftlc.,
(af aiiy location ~ri span) l3$ S
/g 1 C
C/
lq Pala G[cardhcc Linc Not Irtthai Clcay'tnt S
Scicchycl icosi vcCchchcq io lcrRaIH ence+ 6r ts'-o" wcfc c<c<
-Por accc s r I i
- Normd Lwd o.
i~i&a(
t1rt Ap
~
I gl II NorRR+l Vihi Llniifs Ih
\\iloo4Q Arots (5cc Plan of linC)
PCrform tnil ta clcarin n
i avu gh cr'frees ohI+silc IPhikial ClCanrty ltrnib or ovtsI4c V~
'tn Je deterriiinCQAn4 gctatn all ~all tvccJt shrubs> herbs %grasses Bg I gA S.. - Io/3>>/6'l
. <
- proach, (af ctiy
- Line, Ar Dan~cr
- i. Striped Maple (Acer pennsylvanicum)
- j. Mountain Maple (Acer spicatum) d.
- f. Iron Wood (Hophorn beam)
- f. Spice Bush (Benzoin aestivale) j.
- j. Trailing Arbutus (Epigaea repens) k.
- 4. All native grasses, ferns and herbaceous plants.
- 5. All annual weeds and annual plants.
- 5. Pest Controls
- shrubs, ground cover or other designated vegetation on (I) electric line right of way or adjacent to electric line right of way, (2) on Company owned land adjacent to generating plants. substations.
- shrubs, vines, grass, sod and ground cover listed in the Plant Lists on the Drawings, or in these Specifications, required to complete the plantings shown on the Drawings.
- 1. Submitting samples and analyses for Company approval, if requested.
- 2. Preparation of the soil for planting.
- 3. Furnishing all plant materials shown on Drawings, planting, and all necessary planting operations, including the furnishing of water when not available on site, watering, staking,
- guying, wrapping, fertQizing, spraying, mulching, weeding, pruning and protection of roots.
- 4. Furnishing sod, grass seed, specified ground cover, top soil and performing all operations necessary to establish ground cover when specified in areas designated on drawings.
- 5. Cleaning the site.
- Sheets, No. 7 of LA-79828-1
- 6. Guarantee and renewal of plants.
- 7. Maintenance of plantings for period of time designated in these Specifications.
- expense, certified analyses by a recognized laboratory of top soil, peat moss, fertilizer, insecticides, fungicides, chemical weed killers, etc.
- 1. General The species, scientific and common names,
- sizes, quantity and manner in which plant material is to be furnished by Contractor will be listed on the Drawings accompanying this Specification, and as herein noted.
- 2. Qua~lit Allplant materials, other than those designated 'Collected" or "Salvaged", shall have been nursery-grown, freshly dug and with heavy, fibrous root systems.
- shape, proportion, symmetry, branching habit, character and effect, in general, for a particular grouping and/or location.
- cracks, dead wood, or wounds resulting from abrasion, fire or other cause.
- compact, symmetrical plants of uniform color and texture.
- 3. 'Pre aration of Plant Materials a.
- meet, so far as practical, al) requirements for nursery plants as to size and quality, excavation of planting areas, planting, pruning, wrapping, guying, care of planta and planting, except that the Contractor willnot be required to make replacements.
- 4. Plant Measurements
- grade, size of pot or clump, length and number of runners, and any other char-acteristics peculiar to a particular species.
- 6. Initial Ins ection of Plant Materials - Within thirty (30) days following acceptance of the bid, the Company shaQ be notified of the source(s) of plant materials.
- shape, color, and variety only.
- systems, latent defects, and other requirements that may be specified shall be made at the'ite during progress of work, when required.
- t. besoil - Topsottsuatt as tsrttts, frtabta. uaturat toast, porous enough in texture to provide good drainage and adequate aeration, yet spongy enough to retain adequate moisture.
- stones, gravel, stumps,
- roots, weeds,
- seeds, lumps, clods of hard earth, plants, sticks, debris, refuse, or any other deleterious materials.
- 2. Sand -
- 3. Peat Moss,-
- wood, sulphur, iron, fungi, insect life, diseases, and any toxic substances harmful to plant growth, with an ash content not exceeding ten (10) per cent.
- 4. Peat Humus - Peat humus shall be a domestic product consisting of completely decomposed vegetable matter of natural occurrence.
- 5. Manure
- weeds, sawdust,
- shavings, or refuse of any kind, and shall not contain over twenty-five (25) percent straw.
- 6. Commercial Fertilizer - Commercial fertilizer shall be a complete fertilizer and a standard product complying with Federal and State fertilizer laws.
- 7. Lime - Lime shall be an approved dolomitic agricultural ground limestone (calcium carbonate) and shall contain not less than eighty-five (85) per cent of total carbonates, (total carbonates shall be considered as calcium carbonate).
- 8. Mulches - Mulches shall be suitable for horticultural uses and shall be free from insects,
- scale, diseases,'ungi,
- seeds, soils, admixtures, refuse, sticks and other deleterious materials, and shall be of such character as not to be displaced by wind.
- required, where indicated on the Drawings:
- uses, containing one hundred (100) per cent organic material.
- sound, durable, hard stones, free from dirt, foreign and organic matter,
- hose, equipment, attachments and accessories for the adequate irrigation of all planting and landscaping areas as shall be required to complete the work specified.
- 10. Wra in Material - Wrapping material for tree trunks shall consist of a standard manufactured tree wrapping crepe paper, four, to six inches wide.
- insects, fungus, and rotting. It shall be approved by the Company and delivered to the Site in original, unopened containers bearing the manufacturer's name and guarantee statement of analysis.
- Rollers, bulldozers, trucks or any other heavy equipment shall be operated so as not to damage underground utilities, drain pipes, electric conduits or cables, etc. Alltrench or grade stakes set by others shall be maintained until their removal is approved by the Company.
- 2. Ever reen Plants shall be planted in the Spring, until the time when new growth begins to take place, or from August through December.
- 3. Grass and Crown Vetch Seed
- shrubs, planting beds, grass areas, pavements and curbs in areas near planting site(s) shall be adequately protected during construction operations.
- Sheets, No.
- added, base of pits should be scarified a minimum of two (2) inches.
- stored, watered and maintained as necessary until planting.
- means, extra care shall be taken to ascertain that soil is worked under the ball and around the roots.
- height, and placed a minimum of one (1) foot from the trunk of tree, taking care to clear roots.
- access, impede nearby traffic or cause an accident.
- Sheets, No. 23 of LA-79828-1
- trees, and shrubs over 8'-0" high, shall be fertilized at the rate of one (1) pound of fertilizer per inch of trunk diameter measured one (1) foot above finish grade.
- 35Sheets, No. 24 of LA-V9828-1
- diseased, dead, dangerous, or unsightly limbs, branches or twigs,'and to compensate for loss of roots as a result of construc-tion operations.
- analysis, name, vendor and germination tests.
- 0. 2%
- 0. 2%
- 0. 2o/o b.
- 0. 2%
- 0. 2%
- 0. 2%
- a. Straw or Ha Mulch - This type mulch shall be free from mature seed-bearing stalks or roots of prohibited or noxious weeds, as defined in the Pennsylvania Seed Act of 1947, latest revision.
- areas, asphalt tack may be applied by hand, Jute erosion netting, or other approved anchoring
- methods, may be substituted.
- b. Wood Cellulose Fibre Mulch - This type mulch shall be applied at the rate of fifteen hundred (1500) pounds per acre, dry weight.
- a. Crown Vetch Area - Crown vetch seeding and mulching shall hot be initiated until final slope grades have been established by Company and major construction has been completed.
- a. Contractor shall supply and install crown vetch seed, companion seed and soil supplements to areas designated on Drawings.
- b. Crown vetch and nurse crop seed shall be as follows:
- Sheets, No. 29 of LA-79828-1
- c. The inoculant for treating crown vetch seeds shall be a pure culture of nitrogen-fixing bacteria selected for maximum vitality and ability to transform nitrogen from the air to soluble nitrates and deposit them in the soil.
- d. A lication Method (1)
- rubbish, stones, wood forms and other refuse not previously cleaned up shall be removed from the Site(s) and promptly disposed of, or as directed by the Company's representative.
- clean, presentable condition<with all traces of work removed to the satisfaction of the Company'B 14 px esentative.
- weeding, edging, repairing sunken areas or washes, replanting and all incidental work, as necessary, to establish a uniform, healthy stand of specified grasses in all areas specified.
- season, resetting plants to proper grade or upright position, restor-ing planting saucers, and other necessary horticultural operations that may be required for the proper growth of all plant materials.
- waste, dead or pulled weeds shall be promptly removed from Site(s) and sprays and drippings promptly washed clean from all surfaces not intended for this application.
- healthy, dead, excessively pruned, have lost their natural shape due to dead branches, or are not in a vigorous, thriving condition, as determined by the Company's representative during and at the end of the guarantee period shall be promptly removed from the Site(s).
- These, and any other plants that may be missing because of the Contractor's negligence, shall be replaced or added as soon as conditions permit during the normal planting season(s).
- Sheets, No. 33 of LA-79828-1
- curbs, etce e caused by replace-ment operations, and he shall, without additional charge to Company, restore to their original conditions all areas and all construction disturbed or damaged by him in pursuing the work covered>by this Contract to the satisfaction of the Company's representative.
- period, and willbe paid to the Contractor only after all replacements have been made and approved in writing by the Company's representa-tive.
- herein, exclusive of initial maintenance and possible replacement of plant materials subject to guarantee.
- Sheets, No. 34 of LA-78828-1 I
- Period, and upon written request to Company by the Contractor.
- Manager, ng neer ng
- Manager, Re Estate
- Manager, Construction s/