ML18019A830

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Opposes Util Petition for Exemption from Providing Emergency Evacuation Plans Prior to Startup.Util Proposes to Adopt Evacuation Plan Well After Startup.Petition Goes Against NRC Std Policy on Evacuation Plans
ML18019A830
Person / Time
Site: Harris Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 05/22/1986
From: Theilgard A, Theilgard J
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To: Harold Denton
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 8605280275
Download: ML18019A830 (4)


Text

, REQUL RY INFORNATION DISTRIBUTI BYSTEN (RIDB) e ACCESSION NOR: 8605280275 DOC. DATE: 86/05/22 NOTARIZED:

NO FACIL:50-400 Sheav on Hav ris Nucleav Power Planti Unit 1> Carolina AUTH. NANE AUTHOR AFFILIATION THEILQARDiJ.

Affiliation Not Assigned THEILQARD>A.

Affi 1 iation Not Assigned RECIP. NANE RECIPIENT AFFILIATION DENTONp H; R.

Office of Nucleav Reactor Regulationi Divectov'post 85ii25

SUBJECT:

Opposses util petition for exemption fv'om pv oviding emergency evacuation plans pv ior to start up. Util pv oposes to adopt evacuation plan mell after stavtup. Petition goes against NRC std plicg on evacuation plans.

DISTRIQUTION CODE:

YE03D COPIEB RECEIVED: LTR ENCL SIZE:

TITLE: Request fov NRR Action (e. g.

2. 206 Petitions) 8c Related Corv espondenc NOTES: Application fov pev mit v enewal filed.

05000400 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NANE PWR-A PD2 LA BUCl<LEY. 8 Oi INTERNAL: EDO/ACB R

Q FIL COPIES LTTR ENCL RECIPIENT ID CODE/MANE PWR-A PD2 PD ELD/HDBi NRR DIR COPIES LTTR ENCL EXTERNAL: 24X NRC PDR LPDR NSIC 03 05 TOTAL NU}')HER OF COPIES REQUIRED:

LTTR i2 ENCL

"I

) l

John and Anne Theilgard P. O.

Bo>: 225 Bynum>

Nor th Car ol ina 27228 (919) 542-4631 May 22'986 Mr.

Har old Denton Director

~

N. R. R.

U ~ S. N. R. C.

Washington>

D. CD 20555 Mr. Denton>

It has been called to our attention that Car olina Power and Light Company of Nor th Car olina is petitioning your office for an e>:emption on having an emer gency evacuation plan in ef feet prior to the star t up of the Shear on Har ris Nuclear facility. This goes against the Nuclear Regulator y Commission's standar'd policy of insisting that all ar'eas surr ounding Nuclear Power plants have a viable evacuation plan in ef feet prior to the gener ation of electr icity.

CP+L pr oposes adopting an evacuation plan well af ter the star t up of the Shaeron Harris facility.

On what gr ounds do CP+L think they deserve an e>:empt ion? Is it their ver y bad track r ecor d at their Br unswick facility.

Is it the r epor ts of shoddy worksmanship at Shear on Harr is?

In light of the recent disaster at Ghernobyl>

where residents had to be evacuated from as far away as thirty miles, it is inconceivable that CP+L can get away with such a

pr oposa 1 e We believe that the NRR and the NRG ar e made up of people of integr ity who al"e concer ned for tl>e safety of individuals and communities that must e>;ist in the shadows ofnuclear power plants.

For this r eason~

we believe that you will tur'n down CP+L's request for an e>:emption on having emer gency evacuation plans pr ior to their star t-up.

Sincerely>

ohn and Anne Theilgard 8b05280275 860522 PDR ADOCK 05000400 H

PDR

) o

tL lt'I