ML18017A899
| ML18017A899 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Harris  |
| Issue date: | 10/04/1999 |
| From: | Richard Laufer NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned) |
| To: | Scarola J CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18017A900 | List: |
| References | |
| TAC-MA5209, NUDOCS 9910080080 | |
| Download: ML18017A899 (4) | |
Text
.Mr. James Scarola, Vice ident Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant Carolina Power 8 Light Company Post Office Box 165, Mail Code: Zone 1
New Hill, North Carolina 27562-0165 Octo i, 1999
SUBJECT:
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT 1 - EVALUATIONOF EMERGENCY ACTION LEVEL REVISION 99-1 (TAC NO. MA5209)
Dear Mr. Scarola:
By [[letter::HNP-99-024, Forwards Rev 99-1 to Plant EALs for NRC Review & Approval, Per 10CFR50,App E.Encl Provides Comparison of Currently Approved EALs & Proposed Rev 99-01.Approval of EALs Prior to June 1999,requested.With Four Oversize Drawings|letter dated April 1, 1999]], you submitted Revision 99-1 to the'Harris Nuclear Plant (HNP)
Emergency Action Levels (EALs) for NRC staff review and approval in accordance with 10 CFR 50, Appendix E. Enclosure 1 of your letter provided a comparison of the currently approved EALs and the proposed Revision 99-1.
It also included a summary of the 10 CFR 50.54(q) evaluation that you performed, which included the basis for your determination that the changes do not decrease the effectiveness of the HNP Emergency Plan.
The NRC staff has completed its review of the proposed changes and their supporting documentation.
As discussed in the enclosed Safety Evaluation, the staff concludes that the changes meet the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b)(4) and Appendix E to 10 CFR Part 50, and can, therefore, be implemented.
Sincerely, Original signed by:
Docket No. 50-400 Richard J. Laufer, Project Manager, Section 2 Project Directorate II Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Enclosure:
Safety Evaluation cc w/encl: See next page Distribution
( Docket File
'D II-2 Rdg EDunning ton OGC PUBLIC JZwolin ski/S Black HBerkow ACRS EFox BBonser, Rll FILENAME-G:EPDII-2>HARRIS>EALMA5209.WPD
S Pete o
DATE
~~/ 3 /99 1/Sb/99 9 /23 /99 jO/Q /99 COPY e
No e
No Yes/No Yes/No OFFICIAL RECORD COPY 99i0080080 99f004 PDR ADQCK 050004Q0 F
t 1
1
~8 8500 Cy
- 0O IVl R
0 4~
gO
++*++
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COIVIMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 2055&0001 October 4, 1999 Mr. James Scarola, Vice President Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant Carolina Power 8 Light Company Post Office Box165, Mail Code: Zone 1
New Hill, North Carolina 27562-0165
SUBJECT:
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT 1 - EVALUATIONOF EMERGENCY ACTION LEVELREVISION 99-1 (TAC NO. MA5209)
Dear Mr. Scarola:
I By [[letter::HNP-99-024, Forwards Rev 99-1 to Plant EALs for NRC Review & Approval, Per 10CFR50,App E.Encl Provides Comparison of Currently Approved EALs & Proposed Rev 99-01.Approval of EALs Prior to June 1999,requested.With Four Oversize Drawings|letter dated April 1, 1999]], you submitted Revision 99-1 to the Harris Nuclear Plant (HNP)
Emergency Action Levels (EALs) for NRC staff review and approval in accordance with 10 CFR 50, Appendix E. Enclosure 1 of your letter provided a comparison of the currently approved EALs and the proposed Revision 99-1.
It also included a summary of the 10 CFR 50.54(q) evaluation that you performed, which included the basis for your determination that the changes do not decrease the effectiveness of the HNP Emergency Plan.
The NRC staff has completed its review of the proposed changes and their supporting documentation.
As discussed in the enclosed Safety Evaluation, the staff concludes that the changes meet the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b)(4) and Appendix E to 10 CFR Part 50, and can, therefore, be implemented.
Sincerely, Richard J. Laufer, Project Manager, Section 2 Project Directorate II Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-400
Enclosure:
Safety Evaluation cc w/encl: See next page
'I