ML18010A705
| ML18010A705 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Harris  |
| Issue date: | 07/30/1992 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18010A704 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-400-92-13, NUDOCS 9208110175 | |
| Download: ML18010A705 (2) | |
Text
NOTICE OF VIOLATION Carolina Power and Light Co.
Shearon Harris Unit 1 Docket No.: 50-400 License No.: NPF-63 During an NRC inspection conducted on June 20
- July 17,
- 1992, violations of NRC requirements were identified.
In accordance with the "General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1992),
the violations are listed below:
A.
10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion II, requires that personnel performing activities affecting quality be indoctrinated and trained as necessary to assure that suitable proficiency is achieved and maintained.
The licensee's Corporate Quality Assurance Manual, Section 7.5, requires that inspection and nondestructive examination personnel be qualified and certified in accordance with Regulatory Guide 1.58, Qualification of Nuclear Power Plant Inspection, Examination, and Testing Personnel.
Regulatory Guide 1.58 endorses the requirements of ANSI N45.2.6-1978,.
Qualifications of Inspection, Examination, and Testin'g Personnel for Nuclear Power Plants.
ANSI N45.2.6-1978, paragraph 2.3, requires that job performance of inspection, examination, and testing personnel shall be reevaluated at periodic intervals not to exceed three years.
Quality Verification Procedure QVS-103, Personnel Indoctrination, Training, Qualification, and Certification, Section 7.8.1, specifies that personnel performing quality control inspection and surveillance activities shall be recertified at intervals not to exceed three years.
Contrary to the above, as of June 23, 1992, five quality control inspection personnel were not properly recertified within three years to perform nondestructive examination activities.
B.
This is a Severity Level V violation (Supplement I).
10 CFR 50 Appendix B, Criteria XVI states that measures shall be established to assure that conditions adverse to
- quality, such as failures, malfunctions, deficiencies, deviations, and nonconformances are promptly identified.
I The licensee's Corporate Quality Assurance Manual, Section 15, Conditions Adverse To Quality and Corrective Action, implement this requirement.
Section 15 of this manual 9208110175 920730 PDR ADOCK 05000400 6
Carolina Power and Light Co.
2 Docket No.: 50-400 Shearon Harris Unit 1 License, No.: NPF-63 states that personnel are responsible for reporting conditions adverse to quality.
Contrary to the above, plant personnel did not report conditions adverse to quality when the Auxiliary Feedwater (AFW) pump motors exceeded the starting duty limitations as specified by the AFW operating procedure and manufacturer's nameplate data.
This action prevented an appropriate operability determination and delayed a reportability evaluation.
This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I).
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Carolina Power and Light Company is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN:
Document Control Desk, Washington, D.
C. 20555, with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region II, and a copy to the NRC Resident Inspector at the facility that is the subject of this Notice, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice of Violation (Notice).
This reply should be clearly marked as a "Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include for each violation:
(1) the reason for the violation, or, if contested, the basis for disputing the violation, (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved, (3) -the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved.
If an adequate reply is not received within the time specif ied in this Notice, an order or demand for information may be issued as to why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked, or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken.
Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.
Dated at Atlanta, Georgia this 30th day of July 1992