ML17348A510

Forwards Summary & Presentation of 900726 Meeting in Region II Ofc Re Licensee self-assessment.List of Attendees & Viewgraphs Encl

ML17348A510
Person / Time
Site:	Turkey Point
Issue date:	08/14/1990
From:	Ebneter S NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:	Goldberg J FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
References
NUDOCS 9008270098
Download: ML17348A510 (75)

Text

OFFICIAL COPY AUG 1 4 1S90 Docket Nos.

50-250, 50-251 License Nos.

DPR-31, DPR-41 Florida Power and Light Company ATTN:

Mr. J.

H. Goldberg President - Nuclear Division P. 0.

Box 14000 Juno Beach, FL 33408-0420 Gentlemen:

SUBJECT:

MEETING

SUMMARY

- TURKEY POINT PLANT DOCKET NOS. 50-250 AND 50-251

~

s Sincerely, Original signed 'by This letter refers to the meeting conducted at your request at the NRC Region II offices in Atlanta on July 26, 1990.

The purpose of the meeting was to allow the licensee to make a presentation of their current self-assessment.

A sugary of the presentation is enclosed.

It is our opinion that this meeting was beneficial and provided a better understanding of the licensee's assessment of their performance.

hould you have any questions concerning this letter, please let us know.

Enclosures:

1.

List of Attendees 2.

Presentation Summary cc w/encls:

K. N. Harris, Sr. Vice President Nuclear Operations Turkey Point Nuclear Plant P. 0.

Box 029100 Miami, FL 33102 L.

W. Pearce, Plant Manager Turkey Point Nuclear Plant P. 0.

Box 029100

Miami, FL 33102 t

(cc w/encls cont'd - see page 2) 9008270098 900814 PDR ADOCK 05000250 P

PDC Stewart D. Ebneter Regional Administrator E

4 Ijg

Florida Power and Light Company AUG 1 4 1SSO cc w/encls:

(Cont'd)

L.

W. Bladow guality Manager Turkey Point Nuclear Plant P. 0.

Box 029100

Miami, FL 33102 D. Powell, Superintendent-Plant Licensing Turkey Point Nuclear Plant P. 0.

Box 029100 Miami, FL 33102 Harold F. Reis, Esq.

Newman and Holtzinger, P.C.

1615 L Street, NW Washington, D.

C.

20036 John T. Butler, Esq.

Steel, Hector and Davis 4000 Southeast Financial Center

Miami, FL 33131-2398 Attorney General Department of Legal Affairs The Capitol Tallahassee, FL 332304 Jacob Daniel Nash Office of Radiation Control Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services 1317 Winewood Boulevard Tallahssee, FL 32399-0700 Jack Shreve Office of the Public Counsel Room 4, Holland Building

'allahassee, FL 32304 Administrator Department of Environmental Regulation Power Plant Siting Section State of Florida Twin Towers 2600 Blair Stone Road Tallahassee, FL 32301 (cc w/encls cont'd - see page 3)

v'lorida, Power and Light Company AUG 1 4 lg90 cc w/encls:

(Cont'd)

Joaquin Avino County Manager of Metropolitan Dade County 111 NW 1st Street, 29th Floor

'Miami, FL 33128 Intergovernmental Coordination and Review Office of Planning and Budget Executive Office of the Governor The Capitol Building Tallahassee, FL 32301 State of Florida bcc w/encls:

G.

E. Edison, NRR Document Control Desk Ross Butcher, Sr. Resident Inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P. 0.

Box 1448 Homestead, FL 33090 RI 'DP t

R chin 8/ l /90 R:

P R rlenjak 8/q/90 RII:DRP MSinkule 8/

/90 RI P

eyes 8/7 /90,

ENCLOSURE I LIST OF ATTENDEES U.S. Nuclear Re ulator Commission G. Bagchi, Acting Deputy Director, Division of Reactor Safety, RII G. A. Belisle, Chief, Test Programs

Section, RII H.

N. Berkow, Director, Project Directorate II-2, NRR R.

C. Butcher, Senior Resident Inspector, Turkey Point D.

M. Collins, Chief, Emergency Preparedness and Radio'logical Protection Branch, RII R.

V. Crlenjak, Chief, Reactor Projects Section 2B, RII G.

E. Edison, Licensing Project Manager, NRR S.

D. Ebneter, Regional Administrator, RII C. A. Hughey, Senior Radiation Specialist, RII F. Jape, Chief, guality Assurance Programs

Section, RII G.

C. Lainas, Assistant Director, Division of Reactor Projects, Region II

Reactors, NRR E.

W. Merschoff, Acting Director, Division of Reactor Safety, RII J.

L. Milhoan, Deputy Regional Administrator, RII L. R. Moore, Reactor Inspector, RII J..G. Partlow, Associate Director for Projects, NRR t

W.'~A. Rankin, Chief, Emergency Preparedness

Section, RII L. A. Reyes, Directoir, Division of Reactor Projects, RII R.

P. Schin, Project Engineer, RII J.

P. Stohr, Director,

~ Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards, RII A. Tillman, Safeguards Inspector, RII S.

A. Varga, Director, Division of Reactor Projects I/II, NRR S. J. Vias, Project Engineer, RII Fl ori W.

H.

J.

H.

J.

E.

K. N.

V. A.

D.

R.

F.

R.

M. B.

A. T.

da Power and Li ht Com an (FP8L)

Bohlke, Vice President, Nuclear Engineering and Licensing Goldberg, President, Nuclear Diviqion

Geiger, Vice President,.Nuclear Assurance Harris, Senior Vice President, Site Vice President Kaminskas, Operations Superintendent Powell, Licensing Superintendent Timmons, Security Superintendent Wayland, Maintenance Superintendent Zielonka, Technical Staff Supervisor

ENCLOSURE 2

TURKEY POINT SELF - ASSESSMENT JULY 26, 1990 Introduction and OvervIew K. N. Harris 10 Min.

II.

Operations, Radiological Controh, Training, and Emergency Preparedness V. A. Kamlnskas 30 Min.

III.

Maintenance M. B. Wayland 10 Min.

IV.

Eng.'~ring and Technical St<pport I

A. T. Zlelonka 15 Mln.

V.

Security F. R. Tlmmons 10 Min.

Vl.

Safety Assessment/Quality VeNlcation D. R. Powell 15 Mln.

Vll.

Closing Remarks J. H. Goklberg 5 Mln.

INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW OVERALL PERFORMANCE HAS CONTINUED TO IMPROVE OPERATIONS Unit 3 Equivalent Availability for past 12 months

=

62%

(including refueling outage)

Unit 4 Equivalent Availabilityfor Past 42 months = 76.6%

Positive Management on Shift program (MOS) follow-up results Sharp decline in number of equipment operational errors.

LER events dropped from 46 during last SALP period to 33

. during firs+ 11 months of this SALP period.

RADIOLOGICALCONTROIA Reduction of 22% In cumulative exposure Decrease of nearly 50% ln number of Personnel Contamination Events Reduction of 48% in contaminated floor space

INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW (cont'd)

TRAINING 92% pass rate on requalmcation examinations 100% pass rate on Generic Fundamentals Examination 100% pass rate on operator license and SRO examinations EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS Corporate Emergency Preparedness Manager Realigned reporting forSite Emergency Preparedness Supervisor Periodic FPL Emergency Preparedness drills Successful Emergency Exerche on 11/20/89 MAINTENANCESURVEILLANCE Improved plant material condmon Systematic material condition upgrades underway Overdue preventive maintenance items have declined by 37%

v<~,;

Control room "green tags" 'dropped from 95 to 48.

INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW (cont'd)

SECURITY Security Upgrades generally on schedule; significant construction completed Reduction in number of compensatory post hours Decreased overtime and turnover ENGINEERING ECHNICAL SUPPORT Engineering for EPS upgrades generally on schedule Declining Drawing update backlog System engineer training complete; system engineers contributing to more'eliable operation SAFETY ASSESSMENT UALITYVERIFICATI N Reorganized QA Organization Aggresshre Self A~messment Program Enhancements to PNSC and CNRB Upgrades to root cause analysis

I lf

INTRODUCTION AND OYERVlEW,(cont'd)

MAJOR CHALLENGES Continue improvement during EPS and Security Upgrades Plant material condition Continue to improve operator performance Implement Revised Technical Specifications Within each SALP category, the following presentations address:

Strengths/Major Accomplishments V

Areas for further Improvement Other Areas of Current Emphash (aside from areas for improvement)

E I

OPERATIONS RADIOLOGICALCONTROLS TRAINING EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

OPERATIONS STRENGTHS MAJOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS Equivalent Availabilityfor 12 months ending 6/30/90:

Unit 3 = 62% (including 119 day refueling outage)

Unit 4 =, 76.6% (83.8% from 1/01/90 to 6/30/90)

Operator Performance Management on Shift (MOS) program followup evaluations show continued improvement 85% drop in equipment operational errors LER events reduced from 46 (last SALP period) to 33 (first 11 months of this period)

Numbers of licensed operators and trainees Current number of operators is sufficien

.0% of trainees in nation are at Turk Point 1

ey New class to complete training in January 1991; will provide approdmateiy 25 additional operators Plan of the Day (POD) effectiveness has improved AREAS F F RTHER IMPR VEME Component Identification (Labeling) - 90,000 items labeled; no misposNonlngs due to mislabeling since labeling improvements Reduce operator errors OTHER AREAS OF CURRENT EMPHASIS Clearances Analysis/Prevention of Reactor trips Revised Technical Specifications

100 TURKEY POINT-UNITS 3 AND 4 EQUIVALENT.AVAILABILITY (12 MONTHS ENDING) 90 80 al 7o 5o f-40 3O V

illK 2o

<0 0.

39.7 UNIT3

~ 8/30/89 Im 8/30/90 21.9 UNIT4 76.6

20 TURKEY POINT PLANT EQUIPMENT OPERATIONAL ERRORS OPERATIONS OEPARTMENT EVENTS NUMBER OF RECOADEO OPERATIONAl ERRORS (CONTRIBUTORS TO EVENTS%)

GOOD co g4 cE l2 olO

~

8 6

4 JECEOE 0

JAN FEB HAR APR HAYJUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JANFEB HAR ARP HAYJUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV OEC 1989 1990 n

70 72 TURKEY PolNT NUCLEAR LICENSEE EVENT REPORTS GOOD ACTUAL TARGET 60

~

CC~ 50 O~

IZ Q 30 41 20 10 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 PTD) 40 V~)2 {6M%)

TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR 1990 LER's (CUMULATIVE) 3S 30

~~ 20 10 10 21 10 17 4

,,e" 28 2e...""

,0" 23.""""

0 I

Jan Feb Mar Apr May tun Jul Aug Sop Oct Nov Dec (1990)

.Issued Goal

.10

C P

REDUCE OPERATOR ERRORS Actions to reduce operator errors and continue improvement in operator performance include:

o Additional training on normal evolutions o

Weekly open discussions with operating crews o

Self check training o

Procedure changes

CLEARANCE PROCESS A review has been performed to Identify ways to improve the clearance process at Turkey Point. As a result, the following actions are being taken:

o A new procedure for handling out of service equipment has been prepared o

Certain clearanc~elated requirements have been transferred to other operating procedures so that clearance requirements are clearly noted in those procedures o

A new, simplified clearance procedure has been prepared The revised clearance system ls scheduled to be In place and tested prior to the duaMnlt emergency pewer system upgrade outage.

12

RADIOLOGICALCONTROLS STRENGTHS MAJOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS o

Reduction in Cumulative Exposure from 853 man-rem to 665 man-rem o

. Decline in Contaminated Floor Space from 18,149 square feet P/31/89) to 9819 square feet on 7/25/90 o

Decrease in Personnel Contamination Events from 449 to 225 o

Decline in Containment Entries at Power - reduced from a high of 64 in July 1989 to an average of 11 per month during last 11 months C

AREAS FOR FURTHER IMPROVEMENT' Improvements are being made to the ALARAprogram OTHER AREA OF CURRENT EMPHA I o

Radiation Worker Work Practices, V

n 13

a

~

I III

~

a

~ ~

III I III Ill I III I I I e

~ ~

f

~ +

l

~

I

~

~

~ ~

ALARAPROGRAM IMPROVEMENTS PREVIOUS ALARAPROGRAM:

Health Physics Procedures ALARAReview Board ALARACoordinating Committee IMPROVEMENTS TO THE PROGRAM INCLUDE THE ADDITIONOF:

0 0

0 A formal ALARAprogram document (O-ADM~2)

An ALARAplanning procedure (O-HPA%71)

Modified computer software to track hours worked under each Radiation. Work Permit 0

AddNonal manpower for ALARAgroup Discussions are underway between ALARA and maintenance and construction planners on how to further improve planning of work inside the Radiation Controlled Area.

15'" '

RADIATIONWORKER WORK PRACTICES To strengthen worker performance and understanding of procedures and work practices, the following actions are being taken:

0 A manual containing radiation protection guidelines for radiation workers is under development and is expected to be approved during July 1990.

0 0

Provide "spare copy" file of radiation work permits Upgrade radiation event root cause evaluation A policy for remedial training and discipline of radiation workers who exhibit poor work practices ls under review for implementation 0

Improve postings 16

Pt I

V

TRAINING.

STRENGTHS MAJOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS 0

0 0

92% (45 of 49) pass rate on requalification examinations 100% (36 of 36) pass rate on Generic Fundamentals Examinations 100%

(9 of 9) pass rate on InNal operator and SRO upgrade examinations Training Programs reaccredited in April 1990 AREAS FOR FURTHER IMPROVEMENT o

OJT Evaluator Assessments OTHER AREAS OF CURRENT EMPHASIS 0

0 Additional training on normal evolutions LIcense class of approximately 25 individuah to be tested in January 1991

EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS STRENGTHS MAJOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS o

Successful completion of November 1989 Emergency Drill o

Improved procedures and training for classification and notification of short lived emergencies o

Emergency Preparedness Supervisor now reports directly to Operations Superintendent o

Increased practice drills and started using simulator for these Emergency Drills AREAS FOR FURTHER IMPROVEMENTS o

Emergency Preparedness Task Training 18

MAINTENANCE STRENGTHS MAJOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS o

improved plant material condition o

Systematic Material Condition Upgrade Program o

Control room "Green Tags" reduced from 95 to 48.

o Percent of corrective maintenance (CM) PWO's more than 90 days old is less than 50% (INPO target) o Maintenance turnover rate down from 15A% to 8.2%; I&C turnover cut by 60%

o 37% reduction in overdue preventive maintenance PM items; PM I PM

+ CM ratio is 54.5%.

o Overtime (except during Unit 3 refueling outage) has declined; June 1990 overtime was 12%.

o

. Reliability centered maintenance program established; predictive maintenance program enhanced; use of equipment performance data AREAS FOR FURTHER IMPROVEMENT o

Upgrade plant material condition o

Rework OTHER A F

RRENT EMP I

o Maintenance Program

CONTROL ROOM GREEN TAG'ACKLOG GOOD 110 100 IO I-o 20 "10 Legend

~ lOl'Al h

TARGET 0

J F

M A

1989-1990

+pp 7/24/90

ELEMENTS OF MATERIALCONDITION UPGRADE PROGRAM o

Walkdown/Material Upgrade Process Walkdowns by Plant Management; deficiencies recorded Walkdown results used to prepare work documents; corrective action performed Decontamination of floors, walls, equipment and piping Painting Follow-up walkdown o

Other elements of Upgrade Program Schedule of outage PC/Ms

'I Reduce control room deficlencles Reduce contaminated floor space MOV material upgrade plan

=REWORK Rework engineers In each discipline Perform root cause analysis for maintenance problems Categorize those involving rework Provide recommendations to preclude recurrence I

Rework performance indicator Tracked as a monthly indicator Rework determination presently accomplished prior to anatysis Refining indicator to more accurately reflect rework Root cause analysis formalized Corporate policy on root cause/corrective action (NP-?00)

Procedure specifying responsibility for root cause analysis (ADM~)

Detailed root cause analysis procedure (TDIE~)

Examples of root cause analyses. performed PRIIIIS Channel CS - l8C INOV~9A (AFW Trip Throttle Valve) - Electrical 68 FW Heater Outlet Valve - Mechanical e

MAINTENANCEPROGRAM Maintenance Program realigned P

Maintenance policy manual Maintenance supervisory training Feedback to supervisors on accountabilNes.

23

ENGINEERINGlIECHNICAL SUPPORT STRENGTHS MAJOR ACCOMPL)SHMENTS o

32% Reduction in Drawing Update Backlog o

Design related ALARAprogram implemented o

43% Reduction in changes to design packages o

Improved engineering procurement process o

Improved handling of Requests for Engineering Assistance (97%

issued 60 days prior to Unit 3 1990 refueling outage) o Closer interface and support on Plant problems o

Completion of System Engineer training program including Root Cause Analysis o

Improved implementation of System Engineer Program (over 30% reduction in'otal LCO hours)

AREAS FOR FURTHER IMPROVEMENT o

Engineering attention to follow up actions o

Design calculation improvement (44% Reduction In deficiencies since January 1990) o Reduction In repeat equipment problems o

Engineering efficiency OTHER AREAS OF CURRENT EMPHASIS Completion of engineering for the Emergency Power System Upgrades 24

FCST MODIFIED FROM LAST DATA POINT DUE TO PERSONNEL CHANGES ON 4/15 BACKLOGPCM DRAWINGS PRIORITIES 2 THRU 5 ALL DRAWINGS TURKEY POINT UNITS 3 & 4 30 28 26 I)ata Dote 06/24/90 Ht!po(t Number S5 24 Lj 22 20 P'8 c

16 og iL g

~o 14 Qi-s 10 0

6 FORECAST GOOD ESTNATEO GROWTH RATE 75 PER WEEK 0

2/1 7 6/30.

12 1989

/29 6/29 1990 TABGL1 2/2

/2

/2

/2

'/

1993 1992 I Acrid

I i)l<I t'.n.I i'.iNI(tNl SIAN VING (MIIS)

Ier; wt <)C I 'iIIMAIl lI i,l((iWlii

60 GREEN TAGS vs PROJECTS FRN HID-1986 THROUGH JUNE 30, 1990 50 V)~ 40

~ 30 bl LLj Q

20 (3

~ ~I ~\\ ~ ~

~ ~ ~

~ ~

~

~

~ 00Q I

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~

~ ~ ~ ~ \\ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~

~ 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 1 ~ 1 ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~I~I 21

~

~

~

~ ~ 0 ~\\ ~ ~ 0 ~

~ 0

~ ~ ~ ~ ~

~

~

~ 0

~

~ ~ ~ ~

~

~

~ ~ ~ ~

~

~

~ ~ ~ ~ ~

~

~

~

~

GREEN TAGS BEFORE ILPlE4KNTATION CREEN TAGS hAM

~

IIAPLEhKNTATION

, 25 10 10 10

~ 6 i

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

~

7.

S 2

2 2

6 6

4 5

m 1

2 0

+gal +pe p+ppg//g~8p g~

4

+gag+

dpc~+J'6 PROJECTS AT LEAST PANlhLLY IMPLEMENTED

LCO HOURS PER HOURS OF UNITOPERATlON JANUARY1989 - JUNE 1990 I

I I

I rl Ch IRI I

~

I I ~

I Icl l,m I

I@I lzl I I=

I 15I I

I I

I I

I I I I I

cv I

CO I Rl I ~

I I

~

I I ~~I I ot II-I I ~~I I 5 Vi M

+ 0.5 INDICATORMANAGER: A. T. ZIELONKA 3

UNIT3 GOOD I

I I

I I

I ol I

I R I

I g I

lmt

.81' 5

I 12 MONTHS ENDING 1989 DEC. YEAR-TO-DATE

~

8 1990 TARGET n'8 n&.alp'1%

+~

n> Q~ M P

l1IO ~

W q+

pe MONTHIHOURS OF OPERATION UNITED 2.5 K

E I18 2

O Q 13 1

0V 0.5 I

I I

I I

I I a)l

=I Ical I m Io I-I 2

I I

I GOOD

.816 12 MD~+ENDING 190 DEC, YQR-TO.DATE 1990 TARGET

.918 P~~d ~~0~

Q isa MOYHKIBOURSOF OPERAYIQN NMlCA~ALLI%%':TI580

~VSALCH1 ~IA1ARI

0.7 K- 0.6

~ 0.5 Q 0.4 M

CC

~ 0.3

~> 0.2 CO OC~ 0.1 350 250

~ 2OO 0

~150 50 COMPONENT COOLING WATER - UNIT 3 LCO HOURS PER HOURS OF UNITOPERATION JANUARY1989 - JUNE 1990 I

I I

I 5I

)

I I gl II I -I I ~I I.149 I

I I

I I

I I (I l ~~I I

Q I

I%I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I -

I I

I I

I lo I

I" I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

12 MCNTHS ENDING 1989 DEC. YEAR-TO-DATE 1990 TARGET

.171

.117 e~g&~~~1P'~S>~s!'~~

P ~ ye MONTH/HOURS OF OPERATION LCO HOURS.

I I

I I

I I

IRII I-~

I Ig I

ln I

Ijl I

I I

I I

I I

I~t I

I I

I I~

I I

l~

Ilj I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I Nl us

)

gl NI I

I

~1NSTALLA'11ONOF CHEM INJECTlON PCAI MONTHQKOURS OF OPERATION

~~SAQJS~

QQCgTlgl CCMCXl 28

EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR-UNIT3 LCO HOURS PER HOURS OF UNITOPERATION JANUARY1989 - JUNE 1990 0.3 Z2 0.25 0.2

~ 0.15 cc 0.1 0

I I

I I

I I

I I

INI" I

IS I

I>>'

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I IS I

I I

IQ I

Ig I

I>>

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I

.Ig I

ln lg I

I I

12 bC)

ENDING 1989 DEC. YEAR-10-DA1E a

1990 T GET 053 03

++yP ++q5~~>~'P~~+

+~~+~~d'ON'M/HOURS OF OPXRhTION EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR -.UNIT4 LCO HOURS PER HOURS OF OPERATION JANUARY1989 - JUNE 1990

+ 02$

2P 02 CC 0

fteO 0.1S CC 5

0.1

.0V o.os I

I I

I I

I

)mi I >I I

I I

I I/I I ~

I I

I I

I

.01II 1X MOÃ1BS ENDING 1%% DEC YEAR TO DATE

"'BAT GET

.01$

MONrH/HOURS OF OPERATION 29

SECURITY STRENGTHS MAJOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS o

Security Upgrades On schedule Significant construction completed o

Maintenance of security hardware Compensatory post hours reduced by 6?%

o Fewer loggable Security incident Reports No "Red Phone" items this year No instances of inatterItive personnel on post this SALP period o

Decreased turnover o

Low overtime Supervisory. skills training AREAS FOR FURTHER IMPROYEMENT o

Supervisor effectiveness o

Unsecured doors OTHER AREA F CURRENT EMPHASIS o

Attention to detail/complacency o

Communication 30

COMPENSATORY HOURS WORKED BY THE SECURITY FORCE DUE TO EQUIPMENT FAILURES 1989 AND 1990 2,000 GOOD 1,500 (0

CC~ 1,000 0

500 0

32S.S 1,109 1,503 713 204.75 10e25 e.s 555.75 273.75 111.75 4I 1 51 1 54.75 JAN FEB MAR APRIL MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT OCT NOV DEC MONTHS I 1989 ~ 1990 DATADATE: 7l24/90 INDICATORMANAGER:F.R. TIMMONS 31 GOAL = 2oo

100 LOGGABLE SECURITY INFO REPORTS 1989 AND 1990 (START OF UNIT3 OUTAGE)

GOOD 80 60 CQ 40 F 87

".57---.-

59 54 42 49 45 47 55 20 12 25 0

Im 1989 ~ 1990 DATADATE: 7/24/90.

INDICATORMANAGER:F.R. TIMMONS --.

32

-JAN FEB MAR APRIL MAY'UNE JULY AUG SEPT OCT NOV DEC MONTH NOTE:

REDUCTION IN NUMBER OF GOAL 35 UNSECURED DOORS RESULTED IN GOAL BEING MET.

100 SECURITY FORCE TURNOVER 1989 AND 1990 GOOD 80 l-60 0

40 CC-20 0

.5 30.7 18.3 159 30.7 11..5 28.8 19.4 1.8 5.4 7.7 19.2 7.7 7.8 JAN FEB MAR APRIL MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT OCT NOV DEC MONTHS I 1989 '

1990 Nx100/MANNINGLEVELx12~ANNUALIZEDPERCENT DATADATE: 7/22/90 INDICATORMANAGER:F.R. TIMMONS GOAL - 20%

50 SECURITY FORCE OVERTIME t989 AND 1990-GOOD 40 G

I-+so Uj0 20 CCul 20.319

"" """""18:1"""18'1" 17;2

.13.6

~4 11.7 23.3

>>3 1&.e 11911 1

11 &

10 7.8 0

m 1999 DATADATE: TQ2I90 INDICATORMANAGER:F.R. TIMMONS JAN FEB MAR APRIL MAY. JUNE JULY AUG SEPT OCT NOV DEC MONTH NOTE' 1990 GOAI -10%

SUPPORT FOR SECURITY UPGRADE WORK HAS KEPT TOTALSLIGHTLY ABOVE GOAL.

A

SUPERVISOR EFFECTIVENESS ActIons to improve supervisor effectiveness Include:

Monthly Ineervlce training Shift Specialists'atch Tour Program Management observation of Supervisor/Security Officer interaction Seif~dy and classroom training to prepare security personnel for supervisory positions.

The course for sergeants has been Issued; courses for lieutenants and captains are under development.

A 35

UNSECURED DOORS Actions to reduce the number of unsecured door events include:

o install door ciosers o

Preventive Maintenance o

Video information messages to personnel o

Training Mdeo 36

ATTENTION TO DETAIL/COMPLACENCY To reinforce attention to detail and avoid complacency among security personnel, the following activities are ongoing:

Periodic drills on contingency plan actions Additional Management and Shift Specialists'ost tours Emphasis on attention to detail during shift briefings 37

COMMUNICATION o

lntradepartmental Biweekly Newsletter k

Weekly staff meetings Monthly Specialists'eetings Suggestion box in lunchroom Management meetings with security officers 'uring.monthly certification training o

Interdepartmental Security representatives attend Safety, Toolbox and Departmental meetings Security representation in work planning groups Utilize television for dispersion of security information Security Interaction with site personnel in drills, field observations and training, etc.

, h

~

SAFETY ASSESSMENT/QUALITY VERIFICATION Formation of Nuclear Assurance De artme o

Reports to Corporate Level Vice President 0

0 Employee concern "Speakout" program added QC Organization now part of QA, including Construction QC o,

Company Nuclear Review Board now in Nuclear Assurance OTHER STRENGTHS MAJOR ACC MPLISHMEN o

Self assessments Significant expansion/Improvement in QA efforts.

Many mentioned favorably by NRC, all helpful In assisting the plant.

QA efforts resulted in six. documented non cited violations during this SALP period.

Other assessments InNated by Plant Management and departments.

Done by plant and corporate

staff, INPO, various contractors and QA.

o Safety assessment 0

t Improvements In structure.:and,training to strengthen the Plant Nuclear Safety Committee

"'ormation of Joint Test Group for dual-unit outage testing t

Corporate nuclear policy established for

. root: cause analysis/prevention of recurring problems (NP-?00) o Timeliness of submlttais 39

SAFETY ASSESSMENT/QUALITY VERIFICATION (continued)

AREAS FOR FURTHER IMPROVEMENT o

Complete Implementation and fine tuning of NP-700 and other recent root cause analysis mechanisms o

QA for Commercial Grade Items OTHER AREAS OF URRENT EMPHASIS o

implementation of Revised Technical Specification' Assigned three engineers (two located near NRC headquarters) to expedite and support NRC in its review of the Emergency Power System Upgrade submittals Improvements ln structure and membership of the Company Nuclear Review Board 1

40

,I JJ

QUALlTYASSURANCE SELF ASSESSMENT 0

QA8 audit on Fire Protection was noted to be a strength by the NRC Appendix "R" Audit Team 0

QA and contractor audits of the.. Emergency Operating Procedures (EOPs) had Identified the NRC concerns with. the EOP RevisIon Program 0

inspection of the PEP Program including QA/QC assessment of the program found no violations, noted removal of counter productive aspects of the programs and noted some positives 0

An inspection of quality verification functions commented on QA's use of the NRC's SSFI methodology 41

OTHER SELF ASSESSMENT o

Site Management Initiated a review team on the implementation and documentation of all independent management assessment (IMA) commitments 0

Site Management also Initiated a

similar review of the commitments from the NRC's Maintenance Team inspection FPL requested INPO assistance visits in the areas of Motor Operated Valves, Maintenance, and the Human Performance Enhancement System 0

Plant Management directed performance of self assessments in the areas of chemistry, the operating experience feedback

program, operations, organization and administration, maintenance, and emergency preparedness o

As discussed ln the operations section, FPL had WestInghouse perform independent evaluations following discontinuance of the Management on Shift.Program 42