ML17347B697
| ML17347B697 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Browns Ferry  |
| Issue date: | 11/02/1989 |
| From: | Wilson B Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Kingsley O TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17347B698 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8911130076 | |
| Download: ML17347B697 (4) | |
See also: IR 05000259/1989043
Text
pe RKCI1p
~C
Tp0
I
O
O $
'+n
qo"
++*++
OFFICE OF THE
SECRETARY
UNITEDSTATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555
I'tOY
6
19B9
'89
VQ",-6
11:56
Mr. Thomas J. Saporito, Jr.
1202 Sioux Street
Jupiter, Florida 33458
RE:
Docket Nos.
50-250/251
(2.206)
Dear Mr Saporito:
I
C
SERYc"! m~ -6 )989
On June 20,
1989 and by supplemental letters dated June
22
(as
amended August 12)
and July 3,
1989,
you requested
the Commission
to take certain actions regarding the Turkey Point facility.
On
September
25,
1989,
the Director of the Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation
(NRR) issued Director's Decision DD-89-08 denying your
request.
On October 5,
1989,
you sent to my Office (filed on
October 13,
1989)
a document entitled "Answer to Director's
Decision Under
Xn that document
you contest
the finding of the Director of NRR expressed
in DD-89-08.
You
further allege that Dr. Thomas
E. Murley, the Director of NRR is
in collusion with the licensee
and that his actions
appear to be
a violation of the public trust.
You have also requested that
a
copy of your "Answer" be filed with the Federal
Re ister and
placed in the Commission Public Document
Room.
NRC regulations provide that, within 25 days after the date of
the Director's Decision, the Commission
may on its own motion
review that decision,
in whole or in part, to determine if the
Director has
abused his discretion.
Review is at the discretion
of the Commission;
no individual has the right to such
a review.
No petition or other request for Commission review of a
Director's Decision under this section will be entertained
by the
Commission
(See
Therefore, to the extent
that you request that the Commission undertake
a formal review of
DD-89-08, I deny this request in accordance
with my authority
under
The time provided by NRC regulation within which the Commission
may act to review the Director's Decision DD-89-08 in this docket
has expired.
The Commission has declined
any review.
Accordingly, the decision
became final agency action on October
201
1989 '
o
)g89
The allegations of collusion and of a violation of public trust
by Dr. Murley expressed
in your "Answer" have been referred to
the
NRC Inspector General.
Your request to have your "Answer+
filed with the Office of the Federal Register is denied since it
is not one of the types of documents
which may be published in
the Federal
Re ister
(See
44 U.S.C. Sections
1501-1511).
However, your answer will be placed in the
NRC Public Document
Room.
The Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation will provide a
separate
response
to your "Answer".
Sincerel
Samuel J
Secreta
ilk
of the Commission
cc: Service List
I
l
Ir
l
UNITED STATES
OF
ANERICA
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COHHISSION
)
ln the Natter of
)
)
FLORIDA PONER
4 LIGHT CONPANV
)
)
(Turkey Point Nuclear Station,
)
Units
3 and
4)
)
)
Docket
Nos,
50-250
and
50-251
(2.206
Request)
(DD-89-08)
ggggJFIgATEg jSgRVICg
I hereby certify that copies
of the notification of expiration of
Commission
review of DD-89-08 dated
November
6,
1989,
have
been
served
upon
the following persons
in accordance
with the requirements
of
10
CFR Section
2.712.
Hr,
Thomas
J, Saporito,
Jr.
1202 Sioux Street
Jupiter,
33458
Harold F. Reis,
Equire
Newman
and Holtzinger,
P.C,
1615
L Street,
NN
Nashington,
20036
Regional
Administrator<
Region II
U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission
Suite
2900
101 Harietta Street
Atlanta,
30323
Jack
R. Goldberg,
Esquire
Office of the General
Counsel
U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission
20555
Thomas
E. Hurley, Director
Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation
U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission
Nashington,
20555
Offic
of the Secretary
of
he
Commission
Dated
at Rockvi lie> Haryland
this 6th day of November
1989