ML17347A183
| ML17347A183 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Turkey Point  |
| Issue date: | 11/21/1986 |
| From: | Mcdonald D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Woody C FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| References | |
| TAC-61717, NUDOCS 8612050150 | |
| Download: ML17347A183 (5) | |
Text
November 21, 1986 Docket Nos.
50-250 and 50-251 Mr. C. 0.
Woody, Group Vice President Nuclear Energy Department Florida'ower and Light Company Post Office Box 14000 Juno
- Beach, Florida 33408
Dear Mr. Woody:
DISTRIBUTION NRC PDR Local PDR PAD¹2 Rdg T. Novak OGC-Bethesda E. Jordan B. Grimes J. Partlow N. Thompson, DHFT D. McDonald D. Miller ACRS (10)
Tech Branch Gray File
Subject:
Request for Additional Information, Reactor Vessel Material Surveillance Program - Turkey Point Plant Units 3 5 4
Reference:
TAC Numbers 61717 and 61718 By letter dated August 29, 1986, you submitted the Reactor Vessel Material Surveillance Program for Turkey Point Unit 3, Analysis of Capsule V, as required by 10 CFR 50, Appendix H, Section III.
The results documented in the report are applicable to both Units 3 and 4 based on the NRC staff's approval of an integrated surveillance program as documented in our Safety Evaluation transmitted'to you by letter dated April 23, 1985.
We have completed our preliminary review of the Capsule V Report.
In order to complete our review, we require the additional information requested in the enclosure.
We request your response within 90 days from receipt of this letter.
The reporting and/or recordkeeping requirements of this letter affect fewer than 10 respondents; therefore OMB clearance is not required under P.L.96-511.
Sincerely, j, g gfkid5/s/ f Daniel G. McDonald, Senior Project Manager PWR Project Directorate ¹2 Division of PWR Licensing-A Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Enclosure:
As.stated cc w/enclosure:
See next page L
.P
~2 PM:PAD¹2 r
-PocMcDonald:hc 11/g(/86 11/~ /86 PD:PA 2
LRubenstein 11']/86 8612050150 Sbl121 PDR ADOCK 05000250 PDR
,r I
~l X
4 t'I I '
lo I
I; l'
Mr. C. 0.
Woody Florida Power and Light Company Turkey Point Plant CC:
Harold F. Reis, Esquire Newman and Holtzinger, P.C.
1615 L Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20036 Mr. Jack Shreve Office of the Public Counsel Room 4, Holland Building Tallahassee, Florida 32304 Norman A. Coll, Esquire
- Steel, Hector and Davis 4000 Southeast Financial Center Miami, Florida 33131-2398 Mr. C.
M. Wethy, Vice President Turkey Point Nuclear Plant Florida Power and Light Company P.O.
Box 029100 Miami, Florida 33102 Mr. M. R. Stierheim County Manager of Metropolitan Dade County Miami, Florida 33130 Resident Inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Station Post Office Box 57-1185 Miami, Florida 33257-1185 Mr. Allan Schubert, Manager Office of Radiation Control Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services 131?
Winewood Rlvd.
Tallahassee, Florida 32301 Intergovernmental Coordination and Review Office of Planning 8 Budget Executive Office of the Governor The Capitnl Building Tallahassee, Florida 32301 Administrator Department of Fnvironmental Requlation Power Plant Siting Section State of Florida 2600 Blair Stone Road Tallahassee, Florida 32301 Regional Administrator, Region II U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Suite 2900 101 Marietta Street Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Martin H. Hodder, Esquire 1131 NE, 86th Street Miami, Florida 33138 Joette Lorion 7269 SW, 54 Avenue Miami, Florida 33143 Mr. Chris J. Baker, Plant Manager Turkey Point Nuclear Plant Florida Power and Light Companv P.O.
Box 029100 Miami, Florida 33102 Attorney General Department of Leqal Affairs The Capitol Tallahassee, Florida 32304
ENCLOSURE RE UEST FOR AODITIONL INFORMATION REACTOR VESSEL MATERIAL SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM ANALYSIS OF CAPSULE V
TURKEY POINT UNIT 3 1.
An experimental error analysis should be performed to support vessel fluence uncertainly values.
2.
There is nn,iusti<ication for the reiection of the dosimeter measurements and the exclusive use of dosimeters from the charpy bars.
3.
A computational error analysis should be performed to evaluate the relative value of the computed to the measured fluence.
4.
Justify the use of the P
approximation.
5.
Explain the counting in dosimeters which are not chemically pure.
'v
~
~ '\\ ~~ l