ML17346A965
| ML17346A965 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Turkey Point  |
| Issue date: | 04/16/1985 |
| From: | Varga S Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Williams J FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| References | |
| TAC-56806, TAC-56807, NUDOCS 8504300234 | |
| Download: ML17346A965 (6) | |
Text
\\
e April 16, 1985 1
Docket Nos.
50-250 and 50-251 Mr. J.
W. Williams, Jr., Vice President Nuclear Energy Department Florida Power and Light Company Post Office Box 14000 Juno Beach, Florida 33408 K
Distributi on ORB¹1 RDG aHThompson EJordan BGrimes CParrish
~<0ockeX fs le L
PDR Gray file OELD JPartlow DMcDonald JGuo
Dear Mr. Williams:
Reference:
TAC Numbers 56806 and 56807
SUBJECT:
CONTAINMENT INTEGRITY AMENDMENT -
REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (RAI )
By letter dated January 28, 1985 and supplemented on March 2, 1985, you proposed revisions to the Turkey Point Plant Units 3 and 4 Technical Specifications related to the containments.
The proposed amendments will allow breaching of containment integrity of an operating unit, under administrative controls, to allow performance of required surveillance testing.
Additional changes were proposed to provide consistency and clarity using the Standard Technical Specifications (STS) for Westinghouse plants as general guidance.
We are in the process of reviewing your submittal and require the information requested in the enclosure to complete our effort.
We request that this information be provided within 30 days from receipt of this letter.
If you require more time to respond, contact the Turkey Point Project Manager Mr. Daniel McDonald, (301) 492-7363, to arrange an acceptable schedule.
The reporting and/or recordkeeping requirements of this letter affect fewer than ten respondents; therefore, OMB clearance is not required under P.L.96-511.
Sincerely,
's/SAVarga Steven A. Varga, Chief Operating Reactors Branch ¹1 Division of Licensing
Enclosure:
As stated cc w/enclosure:
See next page ORB¹1:DL CParrish 04/j /85 ORB¹l.
L
¹1: DL DMcDonald/ts Var 04/iQ/85 0
85 8500300234 850416 PDR ADOCK 05000250 P
~W,'l tlW lf
>Ll
~
ti '<.Watf.)i'C "P f' WW' W
)
I!
r
~
'f, l W
II)
II Wl )L I,
~
)1k WVl f)
II[>>
~
If,"I vf It lit ft I, "I bi '1,.
f'W )'
ff'f'r),l
)),
~
vi
~ )
~ '>>
)) 1'~)
)
lt ft w-l1 w"
f 8 vw
)fl tt ll El Vj
~
Il
)
) g 1
I Jl I WP I
j
)
tt )
'1
'ifl)
'I ) 'I, I,
lgy ) 'f W 'l)f1~'"~ '
'l W"->>
,I lI,I 1'
ly
'tt) f tt iwfl vtf ) Pf v
)
II Vtlvj
'W I
I I
li gl 'I
)
1lli 1
~'
vli)
W91~ w<ffi
>>f W
1
~ It
~ )I'>>W.
W ii
, it 4 v v
I f [f>>
) 'f'v" I
~ ""f S'->,ft,l gtb I I P tl'iV W ),
Il p]tt
< ')
W) )
) ) ~ li
lf g
)
W Wp I
~
~
WW W1 v,i v1 fut W f) WN
~~
pe REGS~
~o I'y 0
C.
O oQ gO
+a*++
Docket Nos.
50-250 and 50-251 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 April 16, 1985 Mr. J.
W. Williams, Jr.,
Vice President Nuclear Energy Department Florida Power and Light Company Post Office Box 14000 Juno Beach, Florida 33408
Dear Mr. Williams:
Reference:
TAC Numbers 56806 and 56807
SUBJECT:
CONTAINMENT INTEGRITY AMENDMENT - RE(VEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (RAI)
By letter dated January 28, 1985 and supplemented on March 2, 1985, you proposed revisions to the Turkey Point Plant Units 3 and 4 Technical Specifications related to the containments.
The proposed amendments will allow breaching of containment integrity of an operating unit, under administrative controls, to allow performance of required surveillance testing.
Additional changes were proposed to provide consistency and clarity using the Standard Technical Specifications (STS) for Westinghouse plants as general guidance.
We are in the process of reviewing your submittal and require the information requested in the enclosure to complete our effort.
We request that this information be provided within 30 days from receipt of this letter.
If you require more time to respond, contact the Turkey Point Project Manager Mr. Daniel McDonald, (301) 492-7363, to arrange an acceptable schedule.
e The reporting and/or recordkeeping requirements of this letter affect fewer than ten respondents; therefore, OMB clearance is not required under P.L.96-511.
Sincerely, Operating Reactor anch 81 Division of Licen 'n
Enclosure:
As stated cc w/enclosure:
See next page
J.
W. Williams, Jr.
Florida Power and Light Company cc:
Harold F. Reis, Esquire Newman and Holtzinger, P.C.
1615 L Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20036 Mr. Jack Shreve Office of the Public Counsel Room 4, Holland Building Tallahassee, Florida 32304 Norman A. Coll, Esquire
- Steel, Hector and Davis 4000 Southeast Financial Center Miami, Fl orida 33131-2398 Mr.
Ken N. Harris, Vice President Turkey Point Nuclear Plant Florida Power and Light Company P.O.
Box 029100 Miami, Florida 33102 Mr.
M.
R. Stierheim County Manager of Metropolitan Dade County Miami, Florida 33130 Resident Inspector Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Station U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Post Office Box 57-1185 Miami, Florida 33257-1185 Mr. Allan Schubert, Manager Public Health Physicist Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services 1323 Winewood Blvd.
Tallahassee, Florida 32301 Intergovernmental Coordination and Review Office of Planning
& Budget Executive Office of the Governor The Capitol Building Tallahassee, Florida 32301 Administrator Department of Environmental Regulation Power Plant Siting Section State of Florida 2600 Blair Stone Road Tallahassee, Florida 32301 Dr. J.
Nelson Grace Regional Administrator, Region II U.S Nuclear Regulatory Commission Suite 2900 101 Marietta Street
- Atlanta, GA 30303 Martin K. Hodder, Esquire 1131 N.E. 86th Street Miami, Florida 33138 Joette Lorion 7269 SW 54 Avenue Miami, Florida 33143 Mr. Chris J.
Baker, Plant Manager Turkey Point Nuclear Plant Florida Power and Light Company P.O.
Box 029100 Miami, Florida 33102 Attorney General Department of Legal Affairs The Capitol Tallahassee, Florida 32304
Enclosure RE(VEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AMENDMENT TO APPENDIX A OF FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE DPR-31/41 TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 3 AND 4 DOCKET NOS.
50-250/251 Provide the following information to support the proposed changes to the Technical Specification (T.S.) concerning containment systems:
1.
T.S.
page 1-2, Section 1.5, definition of Containment Integrity:
The proposed definition is based on the definition appearing in the Westinghouse Standard Technical Specifications (WSTS),
Section 1.7.
Discuss why reference to sealing the equipment hatch and reference to the operability of the sealing mechanisms associated with the penetrations were omitted in the proposed changes to the T.S.
2.
T.S.
page 3.3-1 Section 3.3. 1 Containment Integrity:
Discuss and justify the conditions under which the exception statement may be invoked.
3.
T.S.
page 3.3-1, Section 3.3.3 Containment Isolation Valves:
This section is misleading; rather than address containment isolation valves in a broad context, it narrowly focuses on the isolation times of valves that receive Phase A containment isolation, Phase B containment isolation or contai'nment ventilation isolation signals, and uses isolation time as the only criterion for valve operability.
Remote manual, local manual and check valves are not addressed, and the need to
exercise administrative control over non-automatic valves to provide assurance of containment integrity is absent.
This section should identify, with the aid of a Table, all valves provided to satisfy GDC 54-57 (including the valves associated with the secondary system penetrations),
all valves included in the Type C test program, appropriate closure times for power operated valves and justification for any necessary exceptions to accommodate related technical. specifications.
4.
T.S.
page 3.3-2, Section 3.3.4 Containment Air Locks:
Provide a basis for the proposed statement, "Each containment air lock shall be operable with both doors closed except during the performance of surveillance and/or testing requirements then at least one air lock door shall be closed."
Also it is not clear how a door will be kept closed if the inner door is the defective door.
5.
The proposed change to the T. S.
uses a format similar to Revision 5 of the WSTS, but the proposed changes do not include prov)'sirens for surbeillance requirements, or leak testing.
Propose comparable technical specifications which address surveillance requirements and leak testing requirements.