ML17346A365

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Request for Addl Info Re 840404 Application for Tech Specs Mod on U-235 Linear Loading & Deletion of Reactor Core U-235 Enrichment Spec to Allow Storage of Higher Enrichments for Possible Use in Future Cycles
ML17346A365
Person / Time
Site: Turkey Point  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 05/04/1984
From: Varga S
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Williams J
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
References
NUDOCS 8405210354
Download: ML17346A365 (5)


Text

~t Docket Nos.

50-250 and 50-251 May',

1984 DISTRIBUTION oc e s

e JNGrace I

Mr. J.

W. Williams, Jr., Vice President Nuclear Energy Department Florida Power and Light Company Post Office Box 14000 Juno

Beach, Florida 33408

Dear Mr. Williams:

L PDR Gray File ORBg1 Rdg CParrish DMcDonald DEisenhut OELD ACRS 10 EJordan

SUBJECT:

FUEL STORAGE U-235 LINEAR LOADING INCREASE-REOUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION By letter dated April 4, 1984, you requested that the Technical Specifications for Turkey Point Units 3 and 4 be modified in relation to the U-235 linear loading and delete the reactor core U-235 enrichment specification to accommodate storage of higher enrichments for possible use in future cycles.

The staff is curently reviewing your request and needs the additional information identified in the enclosure to this letter.

We request this information be provided within 30 days from receipt of this letter.

The reporting requirements associated with this information collection affects fewer than (10) ten respondants; therefore, OMB clearance is not requried under P.L.96-511.

Sincer'ely,

Enclosure:

As stated cc w/enclosure:

See next,pa ORB81: DL DMcDonald;ps 5/ 8/84 5/

DL OrfrJnat sf~by Stevoa h. Vaja Steven A. Varga, Chief Operating Reactors Branch 81 Division of Licensing I gtP5210354 840504 PDR
  • DOCK 05000250 P

PDR

I I

~

I I

1 I

1 6

I ll I Vll Il

)

1 r

6=

6 Il

, I

'll 1

f I

I I

r I I) h I 5 y

lh N

I ff 1

f Vlf I

A 6;

I 6 P I

ff I

I Il I, I lf

J.

W. Williams, Jr.

Florida Power and Light Company Turkey Point Plants Units 3 and 4

cc:

Harold F. Reis, Equire Lowenstein,

Newman, Reis and Axelrad 1025 Connecticut
Avenue, N.W.

Suite 1214 Washington, DC 20036 Bureau of Intergovernmental Relations 660 Apalachee Parkway Tallahassee, Florida 33130 Norman A. Coll, Esquire

Steel, Hector and Davis 1400 Southeast First National Bank Building Miami, Florida 33131 Mr. Henry Yaeger, Plant Manager Turkey Point Plant Florida Power and Light Company P.0.

Box 013100 Miami, Florida 33101 Mr.

M.

R. Stierheim County Manager of Metropolitan Dade County Miami, Florida 33130 Resident Inspector Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Station U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Post Office Box 1207 Homestead, Florida 33030 Regional Radiation Representative EPA Region IV 345 Courtland Street, N.W.

Atlanta, GA 30308 Mr. Jack Shreve Office of the Pub'lic Counsel Room 4, Holland Building Tallahassee, Florida 32304 Administrator De pa rtment of Env i ronmen ta l Regulation Power Plant Siting Section State of Florida 2600 Blair Stone Road Tallahassee, Florida 32301 James P.

O'Rei lly Regional Administrator, Region II U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 101 Marietta Street, Sui te 3100

Atlanta, GA 30303 Martin H. Hodder, Esquire 1131 N. E. 86th Street Miami, Florida 33138 Joette Lorion 7269 SW 54 Avenue Miami, Florida 33143

COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS ON TURKEY POINT ENRICHMENT INCREASE REQUEST CORE PERFORMANCE SRANCH 1.

Please indicate which organization performed the previously approved criticality calculations for the Turkey Point fuel storage racks and which is performing the current analysis.

If these two organizations are not the same, then we require that the organization performing the current analysis provide its own benchmarking resul ts against critical experiments.

2.

Although the criticality calculations for the unirradiated fuel in the new fuel storage racks correctly considered both low density and fully flooded (unborated) water conditions, the wording of proposed Technical Specification 5.4.2 is misleading.

The specification should clearly state that k ff must be less than or equal to 0.98 eff for optimum moderation (usually low density) conditions and less than or equal to 0;95 for fully flooded (unborafed) conditions.